Stabilizer for use in a drill string

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6622803
  • Patent Number
    6,622,803
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 29, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 23, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A stabilizer especially adapted for use with an drill string having an eccentric drilling element, such as a bi-center bit. The stabilizer has a pair of circumferentially displaced blades that lie in a common circumferential plane and extend from a rotatable sleeve supported on the stabilizer body, as well as a stationary blade. The rotating blades are aligned with the stationary blade when in a first circumferential orientation and are disposed so that the mid-point between the rotating blades is located opposite the stationary blade, thereby providing full-gauge stabilization, when the rotating blades are in a second circumferential orientation. A magnetic systems senses the circumferential orientation of the rotating blades and transmits the information to the surface via mud pulse telemetry. A piston actuated by the drilling mud locks the rotating blades into the active and inactive positions. A brake shoe located on the distal end of each rotating blade provides contact with the walls of the bore hole and serves as a support pad for a formation sensor.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The current invention is directed to an improved stabilizer for use in a drill string, such as that used to drill a bore through an earthen formation.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In underground drilling, such as gas, oil or geothermal drilling, a bore hole is drilled through a formation in the earth. Bore holes are formed by connecting a drill bit to sections of long pipe so as to form an assembly commonly referred to as a “drill string” that extends from the surface to the bottom of the bore. The drill bit is rotated so that it advances into the earth, thereby forming the bore. A high pressure drilling fluid, typically referred to as “drilling mud,” is pumped down through the drill string to the drill bit so as to lubricate the drill bit and flushes cuttings from its path. The drilling mud then flows to the surface through the annular passage formed between the drill string and the surface of the bore. The distal end of a drill string, which includes the drill bit, is referred to as the “bottom hole assembly.”




A substantial portion of the problems encountered during drilling result from instability in the drill bit and drill string, which places high stress on the drill bit and other components of the drill string. Consequently, drill strings traditionally incorporate one or more stabilizers, which are typically located proximate the drill collar. Such stabilizers typically have pads or blades spaced around their circumference that extend radially outward so as to contact the wall of the bore and, thereby, stabilize the drill string.




Drill bit instability problems are especially prevalent with drill strings employing eccentric drilling elements, such as bi-center drill bits employing a closely coupled pilot drill and a reaming wing, or bottom hole assemblies incorporating a reaming wing separated from the drill bit or without any drill bit. A bottom hole assembly employing an eccentric drilling element can pass through a hole that is smaller than the hole formed by the drilling element. Eccentric drill bits are frequently used to enlarge, or drill an initially large, diameter section of a bore hole that is below a casing having an inside diameter less than that of the hole to be bored. Consequently, conventional stabilizers sized to provide full gauge stabilization—that is, stabilizers in which the outside diameter of the stabilize is only slightly less than the insider diameter of the bore hole formed by the drill bit—cannot pass through the casing to reach the section to be drilled. As a consequence, full gauge stabilization near the bit cannot be obtained with conventional stabilizers. A lack of full gauge stabilization can result in poor directional control, smaller than expected bore diameter, and excessive stress on the drill bit and drill string.




An improved stabilizer having three axially spaced apart blades, two of which are rotatable, that permits full gauge stabilization of a bi-center drill bit is disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/532,725, filed Mar. 22, 2000, entitled Drill Bit Stabilizer, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. While the stabilizer disclosed in that prior application has many advantages, further improvement in rotatable blade stabilizers, discussed below, are desirable. Consequently, it would be desirable to develop an improved stabilizer that had one or more rotatable blades so as to facilitate stabilization of drill strings employing eccentric drilling elements.




Traditionally, information concerning the properties of the formation being drilled through, such as its density, porosity, electrical resistivity/conductivity, etc., was obtained by a “wire line” technique. The technique involved removing the drill string from the bore hole and lowering a device, such as a sonde, which was attached to a cable, into the bore hole. The device typically contained various types of sensors, which may include gamma scintillators, resistivity sensors, nuclear detectors, etc., capable of sensing information concerning the formation. Resistivity sensors, for example, may be used to transmit, and then receive, high frequency wavelength signals (e.g., electromagnetic waves) that travel through the formation surrounding the sensor. By comparing the transmitted and received signals, information can be determined concerning the nature of the formation through which the signal traveled, such as whether it contains water or hydrocarbons. In some applications, the wire line device featured resistivity probes on independently articulated pads mounted on spring actuated arms to ensure that the sensors contacted the bore hole wall.




More recently, “logging while drilling” (LWD) systems have been developed in which the sensors are incorporated into the drill string so as to provide real-time information to the drilling operator concerning the properties of the formation being drilled through. In such systems, the information obtained by the sensor is transmitted to the surface, using techniques well known in the art such as mud pulse telemetry, where it is analyzed.




In many types of sensors, it is important that the sensor be as close as possible, and preferably in contact with, the formation so as to minimize errors in the measurement. Consequently, in the past, sensors in LWD systems have sometimes been mounted on the blades of stabilizers used to stabilize the drill string. Unfortunately, such approaches have not been entirely successful in ensuring that the sensor is maintained very close to, or in contact with, the formation. Consequently, it would also be desirable to provide an improved stabilizer that incorporated one or more sensors in such a manner as to ensure that the sensor is maintained very close to, or in contact with, the formation.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the current invention to provide an improved apparatus for drilling a bore hole. This and other objects is accomplished in a stabilizer for use in a drill string for drilling a bore hole, comprising (i) a stabilizer body adapted to be mounted in the drill string, (ii) a first stabilizer blade affixed to the stabilizer body, the first stabilizer blade having a distal end adapted to engage the bore hole, (iii) a sleeve rotatably mounted on the stabilizer body, and (iv) at least a pair of circumferentially displaced second stabilizer blades projecting radially outward from the sleeve, the pair of second stabilizer blades rotating in a common circumferentially extending plane axially displaced from the first stabilizer blade.




In a preferred embodiment, the invention further comprises (i) a locking member locking the sleeve into a first position, (ii) means for applying a pressure to the locking member for unlocking the locking member in response to the pressure of the drilling fluid, whereby the sleeve can move into the second position when unlocked, and (iii) means for intensifying the pressure applied to the locking member, whereby the pressure applied to the locking member is greater than the pressure of the drilling fluid. In another preferred embodiment, the stabilizer comprises a sensor for sensing whether or not the stabilizer blade is in a first position. In another preferred embodiment, the stabilizer has a pad mounted in the distal end of the stabilizer blade, the pad having first and second ends, a pivot joint pivotally coupling the pad first end to the blade distal end, whereby rotation of the pad about the pivot joint in a first direction displaces the pad second end radially outward so as to contact the bore hole wall.




The invention also encompasses a method of further drilling a bore hole through an earthen formation, comprising the steps of (i) inserting a drilling string having a stabilizer and an eccentric drilling element into the bore hole, the stabilizer having a rotatable stabilizer blade locked into a first circumferential orientation in which the blade is substantially aligned with the eccentric drilling element, (ii) unlocking the stabilizer blade, and (iii) rotating the unlocked stabilizer blade into a second orientation in which the blade is circumferentially displaced from the eccentric drilling element.




The invention also comprises an apparatus for use in a drill string for sensing a property of an earthen formation through which the drill string drills a bore hole when the drill string is rotated in a first circumferential direction, the bore hole having a wall, comprising (i) a housing adapted to be mounted in a drill string, (ii) a blade extending radially outward from the housing, the blade having a distal end, (iii) a sensor pad mounted in the distal end of the blade, the sensor pad having a circumferentially trailing first end and a circumferentially leading second end when the housing is rotated in the clockwise direction, a pivot joint pivotally coupling the first end of the sensor pad to the blade distal end whereby rotation of the sensor pad about the pivot joint in a counterclockwise direction displaces the sensor pad second end radially outward so as to contact and apply a force to the bore hole wall, the contact creating a friction force when the housing rotates in the clockwise direction that tends to further rotate the sensor pad about the pivot joint in the counterclockwise direction thereby increasing the force applied by the sensor pad second end to the bore hole wall, (iv) at least a first sensor mounted in the sensor pad for sensing a property of the formation.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an isometric view of a stabilizer according to the current invention.





FIG. 2

is a longitudinal cross-section through the stabilizer shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a transverse cross-section taken along line III—III shown in

FIG. 2

, showing the stationary blade.




FIGS.


4


(


a


) and (


b


) are transverse cross-sections taken along line TV-IV shown in

FIG. 2

, showing the rotatable blades aligned with the stationary blade (i.e., in the inactive orientation) and opposite the stationary blade (i.e., in the active orientation), respectively.





FIG. 5

is a transverse cross-section taken along line V—V shown in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 6

is a view of the stabilizer shown in

FIG. 2

with the rotatable blade assembly removed, showing the hatch for the electronics.





FIG. 7

is a transverse cross-section taken along line VII—VII shown in

FIG. 6

, showing the electronics package.





FIG. 8

is a longitudinal cross-section through the rotatable sleeve.





FIG. 9

is a transverse-cross section through the rotatable sleeve taken along line IX—IX shown in FIG.


8


.





FIG. 10

is an enlarged view of the piston housing shown in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 11

is cross-section taken along line XI—XI shown in

FIG. 9

, showing the pressure equalization components for the rotating sleeve seals.




FIGS.


12


(


a


) and (


b


) show the stabilizer according to the current invention assembled in a drill string employing a bi-centered drill bit (a) while the drill string is being tripped into the hole with the rotatable blades aligned with the stationary blade in the inactive orientation, and (b) with the drill bit in operation and the rotatable blades rotated into the active orientation so as to effect stabilization.





FIG. 13

is a transverse cross-section taken along line XIII—XIII shown in FIG.


12


(


a


), showing the positioning of the stationary and rotatable blades relative to the reaming wings of the bi-center bit.





FIG. 14

is a transverse cross-section taken along line XIV—XIV shown in

FIG. 6

, showing the hatch and magnetic detector.





FIG. 15

is a longitudinal cross-section taken along line XV—XV shown in

FIG. 6

, showing the hatch and magnetic detector.





FIG. 16

is an alternative embodiment of the rotatable sleeve shown in FIG.


5


.





FIG. 17

is a detailed view of the burst plate assembly shown in FIG.


10


.





FIG. 18

is a detailed view of an alternate embodiment in which a spring-loaded pressure relief valve is used in place of the burst plate.





FIG. 19

is a detailed view of a transverse cross-section, looking in the down hole direction, through a portion of one of the rotatable blades of an alternative embodiment, showing the incorporation of a brake shoe and sensor.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A stabilizer


1


according to the current invention is generally shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. Additional details of the stabilizer


1


are shown in

FIGS. 3-19

. The stabilizer comprises a body


50


that supports two sleeves—a rotatable sleeve


20


and a stationary sleeve


24


. (Except when the drill bit rotated by a motor located below the stabilizer, such as in steerable drill strings, the stabilizer


1


rotates along with the drill bit and is not stationary during normal drilling. Thus, as used herein the term “stationary” refers to the lack of rotation relative to the body


50


of the stabilizer, without regard to whether there is rotation relative to the formation.) As shown best in

FIG. 3

, the stationary sleeve


24


is affixed to the body


50


by means of retaining keys


76


that extend through openings in the sleeve and engage recesses


79


in the body so as to prevent rotation of the sleeve


25


about the body. The retaining keys


76


are secured to the body


50


by screws


78


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the rotatable sleeve


20


is supported on brass bearings


80


and


82


secured to the body


50


. The bearings


80


and


82


are located in grooves


81


formed in the inside diameter of the sleeve


20


at each of its ends, as shown in FIG.


8


.




FIGS.


12


(


a


) and (


b


) show the stabilizer


1


incorporated into a drill string


27


that includes a pilot bit


6


, a reaming wing


8


, and an element


15


that, depending on the application, may be a drill collar or a motor. The drill string


27


is rotated by a conventional drive mechanism


5


(which rotates the drill string in the clockwise direction, looking in the down hole direction, to effect drilling), such as a motor, that is mounted at the surface. Couplings


14


and


16


are formed on opposite ends of the stabilizer body


50


. Coupling


14


consists of male pipe threads that allow the stabilizer to be threaded into a section of the drill string, such as element


15


. Coupling


16


consists of female pipe threads, formed in the wall of the central passage


28


of the stabilizer body


50


, that allow the stabilizer


1


to be threaded onto the drill bit. Although as shown in

FIG. 12

, the stabilizer


1


is coupled directly to the drill bit, the stabilizer could also be incorporated at other locations in the drill string, such as above the element


15


so that, for example, a down hole motor used for directional steering was located between the stabilizer and the drill bit.




As shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

, a blade


17


projects radially outward from the stationary sleeve


24


. The distal end of the blade


17


has an arcuate surface


19


that is adapted to contact the walls of the bore so as to aid in stabilization. The relatively wide shape of the blade


17


and the fact that it is integrally formed with the sleeve


24


provides a rugged construction. Preferably, the blade contact surface


19


encompasses an angle A, shown in

FIG. 3

, of at least about 30°. The included angle between the sides


23


of the stationary blade is preferably about 30°.




Rotatable Stabilizing Blades




As shown in

FIG. 9

, two blades


18


, lying in the same circumferential plane and circumferentially spaced apart, project radially outward from the rotatable sleeve


20


. The rotatable blades


18


are axially displaced, preferably in the down hole direction, from the stationary blade


17


. Rotation of the rotatable sleeve


20


causes the rotatable blades


18


to rotate in a common plane, which is perpendicular to the stabilizer longitudinal axis, about the stabilizer body


50


.




Each rotatable blade


18


has an arcuate surface


21


adapted to contact the walls of the bore so as to provide further stabilization. Like the stationary blade


17


, the rotatable blades are integrally formed with the sleeve and of rugged construction. Preferably, each of the blade contact surfaces


21


encompasses an angle C of at least about 15°. In general, the larger the contact surface, the more effective the stabilization. However, employing too large a contact surface


21


will result in excessive frictional resistance to rotation when the blades


18


scrape against the wall of the bore hole. Although two blades are preferable, the invention could also be practiced using a stabilizer with a single, rotatable blade, as disclosed in aforementioned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/532,725, or with more than two blades rotatable blades.




In one embodiment, the angle D between the inner edges contact surfaces


21


, shown in

FIG. 9

, is about 40° so that the total angle B spanned by the outer edges of the contact surfaces


21


of the rotatable blades


18


is about 70°. Employing two blades


18


, rather than a single blade spanning angle B, achieves effective stabilization but reduces the drag created by the stabilizer as it scraps against the walls of the bore hole and reduces the resistance the blades


18


impose on the flow of drilling mud through the annulus


13


between the drill string and the bore hole, shown in FIG.


12


. Of course, as discussed below, the configuration of each stabilizer should be optimized according to the geometry of the eccentric drilling element with which it will be used. An alternate embodiment of the rotatable sleeve


20


′, having somewhat differently shaped rotatable blades


18


′, is shown in FIG.


16


.




As shown in

FIG. 13

, the reaming wing


8


comprises an eccentric drilling element consisting of five sets of circumferentially offset teeth


9


extending radially outward. As shown in FIGS.


12


(


a


) and


13


, the stabilizer is circumferentially oriented with respect to the drill bit and the stationary sleeve


24


is circumferentially oriented on the stabilizer body


50


so that, when the stabilizer


1


is mounted on the drill bit, the stationary blade


17


is axially aligned with the center of the teeth


9


of the reaming wing


8


. Further, as also shown in

FIG. 13

, when the bottom hole assembly is tripped in the casing


3


, the rotatable sleeve


20


is circumferentially oriented on the stabilizer body


50


so that the rotatable blades


18


are also axially aligned with the reaming wing


8


. Preferably, the angle B spanned by the contact surfaces


21


of the rotatable blades


18


, shown in

FIG. 9

, falls within the angle E spanned by the teeth


9


of the reaming wing


8


, as shown in FIG.


13


.




Preferably, the radial distance by which the contact surfaces


19


and


21


of the stationary and rotatable blades


17


and


18


, respectively, are displaced from the centerline of the stabilizer body


50


is slightly less than the distance by which the teeth


9


of the reaming wing


12


are displaced from the centerline of the drill bit so that the contact surfaces of the wings do not extend radially outward further than the reaming wing teeth


9


. In addition, the stabilized body


50


, drill collar


15


, and other components of the bottom hole assembly must be sized so as not to extend beyond the profile of the reaming wing


8


. This allows the stabilizer


1


to be tripped into the casing behind the reaming wing


8


without interference by the blades, or other components of the bottom hole assembly, yet provides good stabilization. Consequently, as shown in FIG.


12


(


a


), when the rotatable blades


18


are aligned with the reaming wing


8


, as shown in

FIG. 13

, the drill bit/stabilizer assembly can be lowered into a casing


3


of diameter F that is less than the diameter F′ of the bore


4


formed by the reaming wing


8


—that is, less than twice the maximum radius of the reaming wing teeth


9


. For example, the diameter F of the casing


3


might be about 12¼ inches, whereas the diameter F′ of the bore hole


4


might be about 14½ inches.




Once the reaming wing


8


and stabilizer


1


have passed beyond the casing


3


and drilling is ready to begin, as shown in FIG.


12


(


b


), the sleeve


20


is rotated 180° on the stabilizer body


50


, using the technique discussed below, into the angular orientation shown in FIG.


4


(


b


), so that the midpoint between the rotatable blades


18


is located 180° from the center of the stationary blade. In this position, the stabilizer provides essentially three-point, full gauge stabilization of the drill bit in the bore


4


of diameter F′ formed by the reaming wing


8


. Moreover, by employing a pair of rotatable blades


18


that are located in the same circumferential plane, the overall length and weight of the stabilizer


1


is reduced. Reducing the length of the stabilizer reduces the “bit-to-bend” distance—that is, the distance between the drill bit and the bottom hole assembly motor in a steerable drill string—which improves steering ability. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the overall length of the stabilizer


1


, excluding the coupling


14


, is less than 30 inches.




Ideally, the blades of a conventional, three blade, fixed blade stabilizer would be spaced at 120° intervals. However, such a stabilizer could not achieve full gauge stabilization in a typical bi-center drill bit application because it could not pass through the casing


3


. As shown in FIG.


4


(


b


), preferably, the centers of the contact surfaces


21


of rotatable blades


18


are circumferentially displaced by an angle J that is at least about 60° so that the center of the contact surfaces


21


of the rotatable blades


18


are displaced from the center of the contact surface


19


of the stationary wing


17


by an angle G that is no more than about 150°, and preferably, no more than about 140°. Moreover, due to the circumferential expanse of the contact surfaces, the edge of each of the rotatable blade contact surfaces


21


is displaced by an angle H that is preferably no more than about 130° from the edge of the stationary blade contact surface


19


. This configuration allows the stabilizer


1


to provide essentially the same degree of stabilization provided by a conventional, fixed blade stabilizer having three equally spaced blades. In general, the greater the circumferential expanse of the contact areas


21


and the further apart the contact areas—that is, the larger the angle B shown in

FIG. 9

—the more effective the stabilization but the larger the pass through diameter and the greater the blockage of the flow of drilling mud through the annulus


13


between the drill string and the bore hole. In an alternate embodiment shown in

FIG. 16

, the center of the contact surfaces


21


′ of the rotatable blades


18


′ are circumferentially displaced by an angle of about 90° so that the center of each of the contact surfaces


21


′ is circumferentially displaced from the center of the stationary blade by an angle of 135°.




Preferably, shims


86


are installed between the stabilizer


1


and the drill bit, as necessary, to ensure that the stationary blade


17


is axially aligned with the reaming wing


8


. Alternatively, the threads in the coupling


16


can be specially machined relative to the threads on the drill bit so that the proper alignment is obtained when the two components are fully threaded together. Moreover, the threaded coupling


16


could be dispensed with and the stabilizer welded to, or integrally machined with, the drill bit so that the stabilizer


1


and reaming wing formed a unitary assembly, with the stationary blade permanently aligned with the reaming wing


8


. Such a unitary assembly would avoid the need to align the stabilizer to the drill bit at the drilling site and would result in a more compact, shorter assembly.




Seals


83


and


85


are incorporated between the bearings


80


and


82


and the stabilizer body


50


, and between the bearings and the sleeve


20


, to prevent leakage of drilling mud into the radial clearance gap between the rotatable sleeve


20


and the stabilizer body


50


. Preferably, the clearance gap is filled with oil to facilitate rotation of the sleeve and, when pressurized as discussed below, prevent ingress of drilling mud.




In a preferred embodiment of invention, a pressure compensation system is incorporated into the sleeve


20


, as shown in FIG.


11


. An approximately axially extending passage


30


is formed in each of the rotatable blades


18


. The inlet of this passage


30


is closed by a cap


32


through which a small hole


31


extends. A smaller passage


35


extends radially inward from the outlet of passage


30


to the inner surface of the sleeve


20


just behind the bearing


80


so as to communicate with the oil-filled clearance gap. A piston


34


slides within the passage


30


. Preferably, the passage


30


is filled with a grease. When the stabilizer is lowered into the bore


4


, drilling mud enters the hole


32


and applies pressure to the grease in the passage


32


. This causes displacement of the piston


34


so as to pressurize the oil in the passage


36


, and the clearance gap with which it communicates, to approximately the same pressure as that of the drilling mud in the annular passage


13


between the drill string and the bore


4


. This pressurization of the oil in the clearance gap ensures that drilling mud will not leak pass the seals


83


and


85


into the clearance gap.




Rotatable Blade Actuation Mechanism




Actuation of the rotatable sleeve


20


will now be discussed. As shown in

FIG. 5

, when the rotatable blades


18


are in the inactive position—that is, aligned on either side of the stationary blade


17


so that the midpoint between them coincides with the center of the stationary blade—a pin


72


mounted in a hole


71


in the stabilizer body


50


engages a recess


84


formed in the inside surface of the rotatable sleeve


20


that is located midway between the rotatable blades. Springs


74


, shown in

FIGS. 2 and 7

, urge the pin


72


radially outward into engagement with the recess


84


. Thus, as shown in

FIG. 5

, the rotatable sleeve


20


is locked in the inactive position. The pin


72


is attached by a connector


140


to one end of a piston


141


that slides within a piston housing


40


mounted within the stabilizer body


50


. A second pin


70


is attached by another connector


140


to the other end of the piston


141


. Although helical compression springs


74


are shown, other elements capable of biasing the pin


72


radially outward could also be employed, such as belville springs and leaf springs.




After the stabilizer


1


has been tripped in the bore hole, the flow of drilling mud down through the drill string is initiated in preparation for drilling. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the drilling mud


11


flows through a central passage


28


formed in the stabilizer body


50


and then through the piston housing


40


by means of two passages


42


, shown in FIG.


5


. Although the flow of drilling mud


11


is used to actuate the rotation of the blades


18


into the active orientation, it is important that this actuation does not occur prematurely since it will often be necessary to initially drill out the casing shoe before the drill bit and stabilizer can clear the casing and the drilling of the formation begin. Until this initial drilling is completed, the stabilizer blades cannot be oriented into the active position because they remain located within the reduced diameter of the casing. Accordingly, as discussed below, a burst plate


108


or similar pressure actuated device is preferably employed to ensure that premature actuation of the rotatable blades


18


does not occur. Thus, during the drilling of the casing shoe, the flow of drilling mud is kept sufficiently low to avoid rupturing the burst plate and prematurely actuating the rotatable blades


18


.




When the stabilizer has moved down clear of the casing


3


and the drilling of the formation is ready to begin, the flow rate of the drilling mud


11


is increased until it ruptures the burst plate


108


and imparts a force, as explained below, that displaces the piston


141


upward when viewed as shown in FIG.


5


. This causes the pin


72


to retract so as to disengage from the recess


84


, thereby rendering the sleeve


20


free to rotate about the stabilizer body


50


. During rotation of the drill string, indicated by the counterclockwise arrow in

FIG. 5

(which is viewed looking in the up hole direction), drag is imparted to the rotatable blades


18


as they rotate through the drilling mud and frictional resistance is imparted to the blade contact surfaces


21


as a result of contact with the walls of the bore hole. When the sleeve


20


is unlocked, these forces cause the rotatable sleeve


20


to rotate in the opposite direction (clockwise as viewed in

FIG. 5

) relative to the stabilizer body


50


. A circumferential groove


82


extending part-way around the inside surface of the sleeve


20


facilitates the sliding of the distal end of the pin


70


around the inside surface of the sleeve. When the sleeve


20


has rotated approximately 180°, the pin


70


reaches the recess


84


and the force on the piston


141


seats the pin


70


into the recess so that the rotatable sleeve


20


is locked with the blades


18


in the active position, as shown in FIG.


4


(


b


). Thus, when the piston


141


is in a first position (downward as shown in FIG.


5


), the pin


72


is engaged in the recess


84


and the rotating blades


18


are locked in the inactive position, when the piston is in a second position (upward as viewed in FIG.


5


), the pin


70


is engaged in recess


84


and the blades are locked in the active position, and when the piston is in an intermediate position, neither pin is engaged and the blades are free to rotate about the stabilizer body.




The mechanism for imparting force to the piston


141


is shown in

FIG. 10. A

cap


102


is threaded into one end of the piston housing


40


. A passage


104


in the cap


102


is in flow communication with the central passage


28


through the stabilizer body


50


. A small burst plate


108


, shown best in

FIG. 17

, is mounted within the hole


104


by a retainer


106


. As previously discussed, the burst plate


108


ensures that the actuation of the rotatable blades


18


into the active orientation does not occur prematurely. The burst plate


108


is preferably a metal disk thinned and scribed so as to burst when a predetermined pressure differential is applied across the burst plate, which, in one embodiment of the invention, is about 800 psi. Alternatively, other devices known in the art that are designed to admit fluid when a predetermined pressure is reached, such as relief valves and blow-out valves, could also be utilized in place of the burst plate.

FIG. 19

shows an alternate embodiment in which a spring loaded relief valve


108


′ is used in place of the burst plate.




During assembly of the stabilizer


1


, the cavities


128


and


130


on either side of the piston


141


, the small passages


120


and


122


, the cavity


157


in passage


118


, the cavities


155


and


154


in passage


156


, the passage


152


, and the cavity


161


in passage


167


, are all filled with oil, after which the fill-passage through the pistons


114


,


112


and


100


are plugged, for example, by plug


150


in the case of cap


100


.




As the stabilizer


1


is lowered deeper into the bore hole, it becomes subjected to progressively greater hydrostatic pressure from the drilling mud in the hole. As a result of the weight of the drilling mud in the column above the stabilizer


1


, this pressure may be as high as 20,000 psi. Consequently, the piston housing


40


incorporates a pressure equalization system for the burst plate


108


to prevent its premature rupture. Specifically, when the stabilizer is lowered into the bore hole, the drilling mud will enter the inlet of passage


104


and exert pressure on the outside surface of the burst plate


108


. Drilling mud will also enter passages


148


in the stabilizer body


50


, shown in FIG.


2


. The passages


148


supply an annular passage that is in flow communication with passages


146


and


147


formed in the piston housing


40


, as shown in FIG.


10


. Since the cavity


165


formed in passage


116


is initially only air-filled, the mud will flow inward and exert a pressure that acts against the piston


110


. The displacement of the piston


110


pressurizes the oil in cavity


161


and, as a result of the connecting passage


152


, pressurizes the oil in cavity


154


as well. The oil in cavity


154


then exerts a pressure on the inside surface of the burst plate


108


that is essentially equal to the pressure on the burst plate outside surface, thereby equalizing the pressure across the burst plate.




The pressure equalization system is desirable because the pressure differential ultimately applied across the burst plate


108


when full mud flow is established may be relatively low—for example, only about 200 psi. Without the pressure equalization system, the burst plate


108


would have to be sized to withstand the 20,000 psi applied by the weight of the drilling mud. Since the burst pressure tolerance for burst plates is typically ±2%, it would be difficult to size a burst plate that did not rupture prematurely when the stabilizer was lowered into the bore hole yet reliably ruptured when the flow of drilling mud was established.




In any event, when the mud pumps are started and drilling mud begins to flow down through the central passage


28


, the pressure of the drilling mud in the passage


28


becomes greater than the pressure of the drilling mud in flowing back up to the surface through the annulus


13


between the drill string and the bore hole, for example, due to the pressure drop associated with flowing through the drill bit. Consequently, the pressure of the drilling mud on the outside surface of the burst plate


108


, which is exerted by the mud flowing through the central passage


28


, becomes greater than the pressure on the inside surface of the burst plate, which is exerted by the mud flowing through the annulus


13


to the surface.




As the flow of mud is increased in preparation for beginning drilling through the formation, the pressure differential across the burst plate


108


becomes greater. Eventually, it will become sufficiently great to rupture the burst plate


108


, causing the pressure of the mud in central passage


28


is exerted on the large end of piston


112


. This pressure drives piston


112


to the left, as viewed in

FIG. 10

, which increases the pressure in cavity


130


and drives the piston


141


upward as viewed in

FIG. 10

against the resistance of the compression springs


74


. The displacement of the piston


141


drives the piston


114


, which acts as a barrier between the oil in the actuation system and the drilling mud in cavity


165


, to the right. Displacement of the piston


141


also disengages the pin


70


from the recess


84


, thereby freeing the sleeve


20


to rotate. Once the sleeve


20


has rotated 180°, the pin


72


engages the recess


84


so that the rotatable blades


18


are locked in the active orientation shown in FIG.


4


(


b


), as previously discussed.




When it is desired to withdraw the bottom hole assembly from the bore hole, the mud pumps are stopped, thereby eliminating the pressure differential opposing the springs


74


. Consequently, the springs


74


drive piston


141


downward as viewed in FIG.


10


. As a result of drag and contact with the bore hole, continued rotation of the stabilizer will again cause the sleeve


20


to rotate around the stabilizer body


50


another 180° until the pin


72


is again engaged in the recess


84


, as shown in

FIG. 5

, thereby locking the rotatable blades in the inactive orientation, shown in FIGS.


4


(


a


) and


5


. A chamfer in the pin


70


allows the pin to be disengaged from the recess


84


by rotating the drill string in the reverse direction, counterclockwise as viewed in FIG.


5


. This is a backup feature that ensures that the rotating blades can be oriented back into the inactive position in the event of a malfunction in the piston actuation mechanism.




Since the cross-sectional area of the smaller diameter portion


112


″ of the piston


112


is preferably only about one fifth that of the cross-sectional area of the larger diameter portion


112


′, the pressure of the oil in the cavity


157


that is applied to piston cavity


130


on one side of the piston


141


is about five times that the pressure of the drilling mud in central passage


28


. For example, suppose that, after the flow of drilling mud was established, the pressure of the drilling mud in the annulus


13


was 20,000 psi and the pressure of the drilling mud in central passage


28


was 20,200 psi. A 200 psi pressure differential would be applied to the piston


112


. This would then increase the pressure in piston cavity


130


from 20,000 psi to 21,000 psi, thereby intensifying the pressure force driving the actuation of the piston


141


.




Intensification of the piston actuating pressure is useful since, in order to actuate the piston


141


, this pressure must overcome the resistance of the springs


74


to compression. If the pressure were not intensified, a spring having a lower spring constant would be required, reducing the force used to reseat the pin


70


when the rotatable sleeve


20


has been oriented back into the inactive position prior to withdrawal of the bottom hole assembly. Thus, the piston actuation pressure intensification system ensures that sufficiently large spring forces can be used to ensure reliable locking of the rotatable blades


18


in the inactive orientation.




Mechanism for Sensing Circumferential Orientation of the Rotatable Blades




According to an important aspect of the invention, a system is incorporated into the stabilizer for detecting the angular orientation of the rotatable sleeve


20


with respect to the stabilizer body


50


. Detection of the angular orientation can allow the drilling operator to determine that the rotatable sleeve


20


has assumed its active orientation prior to commencement of reaming. Perhaps more importantly, such detection can also allow the drill operator to confirm that the rotatable sleeve has been re-oriented into its inactive orientation.




As shown in

FIGS. 6 and 7

, a recess


46


is formed in the stabilizer body


50


. This recess


46


is enclosed by a cover hatch


48


secured to the stabilizer body by screws


62


. An electronics package


60


, which includes a printed circuit board and microprocessor, is secured under the hatch


48


. As shown in FIGS.


4


(


a


) and (


b


), magnets


90


and


92


are located in recesses


38


formed on the opposing sides of the inner surface of the rotatable sleeve


20


. A low intensity magnet


90


is located within one of the recesses


38


and a high intensity magnet


92


is located in the other recess. As shown in

FIG. 14

, a detector


94


, capable of sensing the intensity of a magnetic field, is located in a blind hole


95


formed in the underside of the hatch


48


.




When the rotatable sleeve


20


is rotated so that the midpoint between the blades


18


is approximately aligned with the stationary blade


17


—that is, in the inactive orientation—the weak magnet


90


is located adjacent the detector


94


, as shown in FIG.


4


(


a


). However, when the rotatable sleeve


20


is rotated so that the mid-point between blades


18


is oriented approximately opposite from the stationary blade


17


—that is, in active orientation—the strong magnet


92


is located adjacent the detector


94


, as shown in FIG.


4


(


b


). Thus, by sensing the presence of a weak magnetic field, strong magnetic field or essentially no magnetic field, the angular orientation of the rotatable sleeve


20


can be determined. Accordingly, the detector


94


sends a signal representative of the strength of the magnetic field to the electronics package


60


, which processes the information and, employing programed software and other techniques well known in the art, uses the detector signal to determine whether the rotatable blades


18


are oriented into the inactive position, active position, or intermediate position. This information can then be stored in memory within the electronics package


60


for subsequent use, or for subsequent transmission to the surface. Alternatively, information on the orientation of the rotatable sleeve


24


can be transmitted immediately to the surface. Transmission of information to the surface can be accomplished by techniques well known in the art, such as mud pulse telemetry.




As is well known in the art, in mud pulse telemetry systems information from a sensor are typically received and processed in a microprocessor-based data encoder, which, in the current invention, can be incorporated into the electronics package


60


, which digitally encodes the information. A controller, which can also be incorporated into the electronics package


60


, then actuates a pulser that generates pressure pulses within the flow of drilling mud that contain the encoded information. The pressure pulses can be defined by a variety of characteristics, including amplitude, duration, shape, and frequency. The pressure pulses travel up the column of drilling mud flowing down to the drill bit, where they are sensed by a strain gage based pressure transducer at the surface. The data from the pressure transducers are then decoded and analyzed by the drill rig operating personnel. As is also well known in the art, various pulsers have been developed for generating the pressure pulses in the drilling mud, such axially reciprocating valves or rotary pursers, such as continuously rotating “turbine” or “siren” type pulsers or incremental type pulsers.




Consequently, according to the current invention, information from the detector


94


can be encoded and transmitted the surface via a pulser


29


located in the stabilizer passage


28


through which the drilling mud flows and controlled by software programmed into the microprocessor in the electronics package


60


.




Brake Shoe




Another embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG.


19


. In that embodiment, a recess


53


is formed in the contact surface


21


of one or more of the rotatable blades


18


. A circumferentially extending brake shoe


59


is mounted within the recess


53


. One end of the brake shoe is pivotally mounted within the recess


53


by a pivot pin


52


projecting from the wall of the recess. This allows the brake shoe


59


to rotate in a plane perpendicular to the central axis of the stabilizer


1


. As viewed in

FIG. 19

, the brake shoe


59


rotates radially outward in the counterclockwise direction and radially inward in the clockwise direction, while the drill bit (and, therefore, the stabilizer


1


and drill string


27


) rotates in the clockwise direction to drill into the formation. (As used herein, the terms clockwise and counterclockwise are used in only a relative sense to refer to opposing rotational directions, it being realized that rotation appearing in the clockwise direction when looking downhole will appear in the counterclockwise direction when looking uphole.)




Radial outward rotation of the brake shoe


59


is limited by a stop pin


54


mounted in the recess


53


and extending through a slot


57


formed through the brake shoe. A spring


58


, retained in hole


57


formed in the blade


18


, urges the shoe


59


to rotate radially outward in the counterclockwise direction. As the stabilizer


1


rotates in the bore


4


along with the drill bit


5


, the outward force applied by the spring


58


assists centrifugal force in urging the shoe to rotate radially outwardly about the pivot pin


52


so that its contact surface


55


engages the wall of the bore


4


.




When the stabilizer


1


, and hence blade


18


, is rotating in the clockwise direction, as indicated by the arrow in

FIG. 19

, the end of the brake shoe


59


opposite the pivot point forms the leading edge of the shoe and the pivot end forms the trailing edge of the shoe. As is well known in the brake shoe art, contact between the brake shoe


59


and the wall of the bore


4


in this configuration will generate a friction force that tends to urge the shoe to rotate further about the pivot


52


in the counterclockwise direction and thereby drive the shoe further into contact against the wall of the bore. The greater the area of contact between the brake shoe


59


and the wall of the bore


4


, the greater the frictional force and the greater the force urging the brake shoe into contact with the wall of the bore. Thus, the brake shoe


29


is preferably “self-energizing” in that even slight contact between the brake shoe


59


and the bore hole wall will drive the brake shoe radially outward so as to increase the force urging the shoe against the wall.




The brake shoe


59


serves to ensure that sufficient frictional resistance is developed between the blades


18


and the bore


4


to ensure that the blades


18


rotate into the active position when released by the actuation mechanism, and subsequently rotate back into the inactive system prior to withdrawal of the stabilizer, as previously discussed.




Formation Sensor




According to one aspect of the invention, the brake shoe


59


can be used as a sensor pad that facilitates sensing information about the formation being drilled through, such as that used in LWD systems. As shown in

FIG. 19

, a sensor


45


is mounted in a recess


47


formed in the contact surface


55


of the brake shoe


49


. The sensor


45


senses information concerning the formation


2


being drill through, such as its density, porosity, electrical resistivity/conductivity, etc., and may be a gamma scintillator, resistivity sensor, or nuclear detectors, for example, or other sensor well known in the field. A cover


39


can be installed over the recess to protect the sensor


45


from damage. The signal from the sensor


45


is sent via a conductor, not shown, extending through passage


49


to the electronics package


60


, which processes the signal and prepares it for transmission to the surface using techniques well known in the field, for example, using the mud pulse telemetry system discussed above in connection with the mechanism for determining the circumferential orientation of the rotatable blades.




The use of the brake shoe


59


as a support pad for the sensor


45


ensures that the sensor is placed into contact with, or very close to, the wall of the bore hole


4


, thereby ensuring accurate measurements.




Although the sensor


45


is preferably placed in the brake shoe


59


, the invention could also be practiced by incorporating the sensor in the distal end of the rotating or stationary blades without benefit of the brake shoe.




The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof and, accordingly, reference should be made to the appended claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as indicating the scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A stabilizer for use in a drill string for drilling a bore hole, comprising:a) a stabilizer body adapted to be mounted in said drill string; b) a first stabilizer blade affixed to said stabilizer body, said first stabilizer blade having a distal end adapted to engage said bore hole; c) a sleeve rotatably mounted on said stabilizer body; d) at least a pair of circumferentially displaced second stabilizer blades projecting radially outward from said sleeve, said pair of second stabilizer blades rotating in a common circumferentially extending plane axially displaced from said first stabilizer blade; and e) a locking mechanism for locking said sleeve in first and second circumferential orientations, wherein when said sleeve is in said first circumferential orientation, the midpoint between said pair of second blades is substantially axially aligned with said first stabilizer blade.
  • 2. The stabilizer according to claim 1, wherein when said sleeve is in said second circumferential orientation, the midpoint between said pair of second stabilizer blades is substantially opposite said first stabilizer blade.
  • 3. The stabilizer according to claim 1, herein said first and second circumferential orientations are spaced approximately 180° apart.
  • 4. The stabilizer according to claim 1, wherein the centers of said distal ends of said second stabilizer blades are circumferentially displaced by an angle of at least about 60°.
  • 5. The stabilizer according to claim 1, further comprising a sensor mounted in said distal end of at least one of said blades for sensing a property of a formation through which bore hole is drilled.
  • 6. A stabilizer for use in a drill string for drilling a bore hole, and through which a drilling fluid flows, comprising:a) a stabilizer body adapted to be mounted in said drill string; b) a sleeve rotatably mounted on said stabilizer body; c) a stabilizer blade projecting radially outward from said sleeve; d) a movable locking member, said locking member locking said sleeve into a first circumferential orientation when said locking member is in a first position and unlocking said sleeve when said locking member is in a second position, whereby said sleeve can rotate around said stabilizer body when unlocked; e) a first piston coupled to said locking member, whereby actuation of said first piston drives said locking member from said first position to said second position, wherein said first piston is actuated by pressure applied by said drilling fluid to said first piston; f) means for intensifying the pressure applied to said first piston by said drilling fluid, wherein said pressure intensifying means comprises a second piston.
  • 7. The stabilizer according to claim 6, wherein said locking member also locks said sleeve into a second circumferential orientation.
  • 8. The stabilizer according to claim 6, whereby said piston is actuated by the flow of said drilling fluid through said drill string.
  • 9. The stabilizer according to claim 6, wherein said second piston has an enlarged diameter portion and a reduced diameter portion, and wherein said drilling fluid applies pressure to said enlarged diameter portion and said piston reduced diameter portion applies pressure greater than said drilling fluid pressure to said first piston.
  • 10. A stabilizer for use in a drill string for drilling a bore hole, comprising:a) a stabilizer body adapted to be mounted in said drill string; b) a sleeve rotatably mounted on said stabilizer body; c) a stabilizer blade projecting radially outward from said sleeve, said stabilizer blade having a distal end; d) a pad mounted in said distal end of said stabilizer blade, said pad having first and second ends, a pivot joint pivotally coupling said pad first end to said blade distal end, whereby rotation of said pad about said pivot joint in a first direction displaces said pad second end radially outward so as to contact said bore hole wall.
  • 11. A drill string for use in drilling a bore hole in an earthen formation, said bore hole having a wall, comprising:a) a drill bit; b) means for rotating said drill bit in the clockwise direction so as to drill a bore hole in an earthen formation; c) a stabilizer mounted proximate said drill bit, said stabilizer comprising a housing and a stabilizer blade extending radially outward from said housing, said blade having a distal end; d) a sensor pad mounted in said distal end of said blade, said sensor pad having first and second ends, said second end being circumferentially displaced from said first end in the clockwise direction, whereby said second end forms a leading edge when said drill string rotates in said clockwise direction, a pivot joint pivotally coupling said first end of said sensor pad to said blade distal end whereby rotation of said sensor pad about said pivot joint in a counterclockwise direction displaces said sensor pad second end radially outward so as to contact and apply a force to said bore hole wall, said contact creating a friction force when said drill string rotates in said clockwise direction that tends to further rotate said sensor pad about said pivot joint in said counterclockwise direction thereby increasing said force applied by said sensor pad second end to said bore hole wall; e) a sensor mounted in said sensor pad for sensing a property of said formation.
  • 12. The drill string according to claim 11, further comprising a compression spring for urging said sensor pad to rotate around said pivot joint in said counterclockwise direction so as to cause said sensor pad second end to contact and apply said force to said bore hole wall.
  • 13. The drill string according to claim 11, wherein said drill bit comprises an eccentric drilling element.
  • 14. The drill string according to claim 11, further comprising a reaming wing disposed proximate said drill bit.
  • 15. The drill string according to claim 11, wherein said sensor is a resistivity sensor.
  • 16. The drill string according to claim 11, further comprising means for limiting said rotation of said sensor pad about said pivot joint in said counterclockwise direction.
  • 17. An apparatus for use in a drill string for sensing a property of an earthen formation through which said drill string drills a bore hole when said drill string is rotated in a first circumferential direction, said bore hole having a wall, comprising:a) a housing adapted to be mounted in a drill string; b) a blade extending radially outward from said housing, said blade having a distal end; c) a sensor pad mounted in said distal end of said blade, said sensor pad having a circumferentially trailing first end and a circumferentially leading second end when said housing is rotated in the clockwise direction, a pivot joint pivotally coupling said first end of said sensor pad to said blade distal end whereby rotation of said sensor pad about said pivot joint in a counterclockwise direction displaces said sensor pad second end radially outward so as to contact and apply a force to said bore hole wall, said contact creating a friction force when said housing rotates in said clockwise direction that tends to further rotate said sensor pad about said pivot joint in said counterclockwise direction thereby increasing said force applied by said sensor pad second end to said bore hole wall; d) at least a first sensor mounted in said sensor pad for sensing a property of said formation.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/532,725, filed Mar. 22, 2000, entitled DRILL BIT STABILIZER.

US Referenced Citations (85)
Number Name Date Kind
1769921 Hansen Jul 1930 A
1959368 Kennedye May 1934 A
2045629 Bettis Jun 1936 A
2308147 Ballagh Jan 1943 A
2671641 Hinkle Mar 1954 A
2715552 Lane Aug 1955 A
2877062 Hall Mar 1959 A
2911195 Backer Nov 1959 A
2971582 Marsh Feb 1961 A
3423671 Vezin Jan 1969 A
3588199 Hopmans Jun 1971 A
3799279 Farris Mar 1974 A
3825081 McMahon Jul 1974 A
3916998 Bass, Jr. et al. Nov 1975 A
3942824 Sable Mar 1976 A
4071101 Ford Jan 1978 A
4071285 Kellner Jan 1978 A
4076084 Tighe Feb 1978 A
4080010 Young Mar 1978 A
4101179 Barron Jul 1978 A
4102552 Kellner Jul 1978 A
4394881 Shirley Jul 1983 A
4560013 Beimgraben Dec 1985 A
4580642 Gosch Apr 1986 A
4600063 Beasley Jul 1986 A
4606417 Webb et al. Aug 1986 A
4610307 Jürgens et al. Sep 1986 A
4630690 Beasley et al. Dec 1986 A
4630694 Walton et al. Dec 1986 A
4635736 Shirley Jan 1987 A
4635738 Schillinger et al. Jan 1987 A
4638873 Welborn Jan 1987 A
4683956 Russell Aug 1987 A
4693328 Furse et al. Sep 1987 A
4698794 Kruger et al. Oct 1987 A
4729438 Walker et al. Mar 1988 A
4739842 Kruger et al. Apr 1988 A
4807708 Forrest et al. Feb 1989 A
4814609 Wraight et al. Mar 1989 A
4817740 Belmgraben Apr 1989 A
4854403 Ostertag et al. Aug 1989 A
4879463 Wraight et al. Nov 1989 A
4984633 Langer et al. Jan 1991 A
4989679 Amaudric du Chaffaut Feb 1991 A
5038872 Shirley Aug 1991 A
5050692 Beimgraben Sep 1991 A
5060736 Neff Oct 1991 A
5094304 Briggs Mar 1992 A
5099931 Krueger et al. Mar 1992 A
5150757 Nunley Sep 1992 A
5180021 Champion et al. Jan 1993 A
5200705 Clark et al. Apr 1993 A
5213168 Warren et al. May 1993 A
5222565 Collinsworth Jun 1993 A
5235285 Clark et al. Aug 1993 A
5242020 Cobern Sep 1993 A
5250806 Rhein-Knudsen et al. Oct 1993 A
5265684 Rosenhauch Nov 1993 A
5293945 Rosenhauch et al. Mar 1994 A
5307885 Kuwana et al. May 1994 A
5317111 Orban et al. May 1994 A
5318137 Johnson et al. Jun 1994 A
5363931 Moriarty Nov 1994 A
5368114 Tandberg et al. Nov 1994 A
5437342 Powada Aug 1995 A
5465759 Carlson et al. Nov 1995 A
5474143 Majkovic Dec 1995 A
5495899 Pastusek et al. Mar 1996 A
5497842 Pastusek et al. Mar 1996 A
5511627 Anderson Apr 1996 A
5522467 Stevens et al. Jun 1996 A
5542454 Carlson et al. Aug 1996 A
5603386 Webster Feb 1997 A
5667027 Poffenroth Sep 1997 A
5678644 Fielder Oct 1997 A
5765653 Doster et al. Jun 1998 A
5941321 Hughes Aug 1999 A
5957223 Doster et al. Sep 1999 A
6116356 Doster et al. Sep 2000 A
6173793 Thompson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179066 Nasr et al. Jan 2001 B1
6213226 Eppink et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227312 Eppink et al. May 2001 B1
6247542 Kruspe et al. Jun 2001 B1
6290003 Russell Sep 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0 058 061 Aug 1982 EP
0457650 Nov 1991 EP
2121453 Dec 1983 GB
WO 9311334 Jun 1993 WO
WO 0112945 Feb 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Casto, R.G., et al., “Use of bicenter PDC bit reduces drilling cost,” Oil & Gas Journal, Nov. 13, 1995, 92-96.
Csonka, G., et al., “Ream while drilling technology applied successfully offshore Australia,” SPE International, Aug. 28-31, 1996, SPE 36990, 271-278.
Fielder, C.M., “Advances improve bi-center drill bits,” The American Oil & Gas Reporter, Apr. 1995, 3 pages.
Le Blanc, L. (ed.), et al., “Reaming-while-drilling keys effort to reduce tripping of long drillstrings,” Offshore, Apr. 1996, 30-32.
Myhre, K., et al., “Application of bicenter bits in well-deepening operations,” IADC/SPE, Feb. 27-Mar. 2, 1990, IADC/SPE 19921, 131-137.
Rothe, J.R., et al., “Ream-while-drilling tool cuts costs of three Venezuelan wells,” Oil & Gas Journal, Jan. 13, 1997, 33-40.
Sketchier, B.C., et al., “New bi-center technology proves effective in slim hole horizontal well,” SPC International, Feb. 28-Mar. 2, 1995, SPE/IADC 29396, 559-567.
Warren, T.M., et al., “Simultaneous drilling and reaming with fixed blade reamers,” APE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Oct. 22-25, 1995, 1-11.
Burkhardt, Transactions, Society of Automotive Engineers, “Fundamentals of Brake Design”, Part II, pp 267-316, 1925.
Huck, Transactions, Society of Automotive Engineers, “Breaks for Heavy Vehicles”, Part I, pp 443-465, 1926.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/532725 Mar 2000 US
Child 09/896020 US