Many restaurants offer pedestal tables for patrons to enjoy meals and beverages. Ideally, these tables provide diners with a tabletop that is stable or steady, or otherwise free of any movement that might frustrate the meal, for example, by causing beverages to tip or spill. But stability of a table is often subject to myriad of factors. Uneven surfaces or ground warping, however small, may translate into significant “wobble” in the tabletop. This is particularly true at outdoor venues, but also common on any surface. Leveling feet or “glides” that are threaded and adjustable are meant to address these factors tend to offer only limited relief, if any at all. These devices are cumbersome to use because staff typically need to remove items from the tabletop and then turn the table on its side simply to raise or lower the position of the glide. Likewise, staff usually have few options to move the table because of space constraints, particularly at busy, popular restaurants that take full advantage of their footprint. Other solutions to this problem, like placing matchbooks, napkins, wedges, or other “fixed” objects, not only fail to adequately stabilize the table, but also cannot accommodate changes staff may make to re-position tables across the footprint of the restaurant.
The subject matter of this disclosure relates to improvements to address wobble in tables, among other work surfaces. Of particular interest are embodiments that utilize a moveable wedge to raise or lower a table leg. These embodiments may include devices that secure to the table leg, or table generally, to make it easy for the device to move or reposition with the table. A benefit of the design is that the device is readily accessible for staff (or diners) to use to stabilize the table in a short amount of time and without the need to remove items from the tabletop. The device may reside within the table leg, generally out of sight of patrons. In one implementation, the embodiments may utilize a linkage, or flexible member, that allows the moveable wedge to remain flat on the floor. This feature provides a solid load bearing surface between the moveable wedge and the floor.
This specification refers to the following drawings:
These drawings and any description herein represent examples that may disclose or explain the invention. The examples include the best mode and enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The drawings are not to scale unless the discussion indicates otherwise. Elements in the examples may appear in one or more of the several views or in combinations of the several views. The drawings may use like reference characters to designate identical or corresponding elements. Methods are exemplary only and may be modified by, for example, reordering, adding, removing, and/or altering individual steps or stages. The specification may identify such stages, as well as any parts, components, elements, or functions, in the singular with the word “a” or “an;” however, this should not exclude plural of any such designation, unless the specification explicitly recites or explains such exclusion. Likewise, any references to “one embodiment” or “one implementation” does not exclude the existence of additional embodiments or implementations that also incorporate the recited features.
The discussion now turns to describe features of the examples shown in the drawings noted above. These features address problems with stability of tables, for example, tables found in restaurants or eateries. The embodiments herein introduce designs that can eliminate wobble at the tabletop to allow diners to enjoy their meal. These designs also prevent movement of beverages, which often are likely to tip or spill due to even slight wobble of the tabletop. Other embodiments are contemplated within the scope of this disclosure.
Broadly, the table stabilizing device 100 may be configured to provide end users with a simple solution to table wobble. These configurations may include devices that the end user can actuate with their foot. This feature may alleviate side-to-side rocking, among other issues, that can translate to wide swings or wobble in the tabletop T. A benefit of the design is that it can stabilize the table without the need to displace the table from its position in a restaurant, a home, or like location or establishment.
The table assembly 102 may be configured to provide an operative surface that an end user may utilize for dining, work, or the like. These configurations may include designs of various shapes or sizes. The designs may use different arrangements of the table base B. A pedestal table, for example, may have multiple table legs L, for example, three or four, that extend or radiate outwardly from the pedestal C. The table stabilizing device 100 may adjust the height H1 of one of the table legs relative to the surface 106, like carpet, tile, wood, or other floor covering. The table stabilizing device 100 is amendable for outdoor use, as well, where the surface 106 may feature brick, cobblestone, cement or concrete, decking, and the like.
The body 108 may be configured to fit in proximity to the table leg L. These configurations may include devices with a stabilizing mechanism that is easy to assemble into the table assembly 102 and operate by an end user. In one implementation, the device may incorporate within the structure of the table leg L. An exposed portion or “actuator” of the device may permit the end user to acuate the mechanism to cure any wobble or instability in the table assembly 102. The mechanism may require parts of the table assembly 102, for example the table leg L, to include features like slot(s) or hole(s) to provide the end user with access to the actuator. However, this disclosure also contemplates that the mechanism may find use to stabilize the operative surface without any modifications to the table assembly 102.
The adjustment 110 may be configured to change the position of the wedge W relative to the load bearing point 104. These configurations may include devices that incorporate degrees of freedom, like pivots, to ensure appropriate locations for the wedge W. The pivots may allow parts of the device to move or rotate relative to other parts. This feature may distribute weight of the table leg L (and the table assembly 102 generally) in a manner that allows the wedge W to move more freely. It may also prevent deformation of the wedge W as the wedge W translates relative to the load bearing point 104.
The slider 112 may also include features to enhance operability of the device. In one implementation, the slider 112 may include a knob 134 with a bottom side that has a protrusion or “keel” 136 to prevent rotation of the knob 134. On its top side, the knob 134 may have an engagement portion 138 with geometry to accommodate operation of the stabilizing device 100 by the end user. The device may also benefit from a tension mechanism 140 that can secure the knob 134 to the body 114. This device may also create a “clamping” force therebetween. In one implementation, the tension mechanism 140 may embody a “resilient” device 142 with a spring 144, shown here as a coil spring. This disclosure also contemplates use of flat springs, spring washers, or similar devices in the resilient device 142 as well. The coil spring 144 may fit or insert onto a bolt 146. The slider 112 may include a mounting location 148 for the resilient device 142. For example, the parts 144, 146 may insert into a hole 150 (shown here with a counter-bore 152) in the body 114. The bolt 146 may engage with threads in a threaded hole 154 in the knob 134. In one example, a lock washer or lock nut may find use to prevent the bolt 146 from backing out of the threaded hole 154.
The slider 112 is shown in a first or “disengaged” position. This position may correspond with a first configuration for the slider 112. The inclined portion 116 does not interpose between the load bearing point 104 and the surface 106. Lateral slots 126, 128 exhibit a first value for dimension D in this first position. In use, an end user may engage the engagement portion 138 of the knob 134 to “push” or “pull” the body 114 with their foot or hand. This action may cause the body 114 to transit within the hollow opening O, preferably in positions along the length of the table leg L1. These positions may interpose the inclined portion 116 between the load bearing point 104 on the table leg L1 and the floor 106.
As noted, changing the position of the slider 112 will stabilize the tabletop T. “Pulling” the slider 112 towards the load bearing point 104 of the table leg L1, or away from the pedestal C, will move the contact point up the inclined portion 116 and further increase the height H1. On the other hand, “pushing” the slider 112 away from the load bearing point 104 of the table leg L1, or towards the pedestal C, will move the contact point down the inclined portion 116 and decrease the height H1. Notably, lateral slots 126, 128 have a second value for dimension D in this second position of the slider 112 that is different (and less than) the first value in the first position of the slider 112 noted above. This feature creates pivots P1, P2 with axis R1, R2 about which the body 114 flexes or “rotates” to allow the heel portion 124 to move relative to the contact portion 118. This feature also changes the configuration of the slider 112 from its first configuration to a second configuration. In one implementation, the heel portion 124 will move higher or lower relative to the floor 106 in response to the direction of travel of the slider 112. The contact portion 118 remains in contact with the floor 106.
The examples below include certain elements or clauses to describe embodiments contemplated within the scope of this specification. These elements may be combined with other elements and clauses to also describe embodiments. This specification may include and contemplate other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. These other examples fall within the scope of the claims, for example, if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2103202 | Green | Oct 1933 | A |
2857707 | Caioli | Jan 1956 | A |
5249767 | Mellen | Oct 1993 | A |
5533457 | Cox | Jul 1996 | A |
5690303 | Winters | Nov 1997 | A |
5944291 | Kato | Aug 1999 | A |
6009815 | Hartman | Jan 2000 | A |
6186453 | Redbone | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6283047 | Haller(-Hess) | Sep 2001 | B1 |
7240886 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7677524 | Brooke | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7930980 | Brooke | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8328149 | McLaughlin | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8607715 | Catoni | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8651441 | Brooke | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8876071 | Brooke | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8997662 | Heyring | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9414676 | Rafii | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9416483 | Freakes | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9635939 | Taylor | May 2017 | B2 |
9833071 | Heyring et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
D815477 | Molteni | Apr 2018 | S |
10130174 | Perrin | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10660438 | Hognaland et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
11457740 | Giery | Oct 2022 | B2 |
20030230681 | Gwynneth | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20060054065 | Gild | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080087777 | Christian | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090183653 | Brooke | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100071599 | McEntire | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20120048153 | MacArthur-Onslow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152156 | Watson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120193503 | Pike | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120241568 | Christian et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130112821 | Brooke | May 2013 | A1 |
20200022494 | Paul | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20210337963 | Harvard et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220071384 | Giery | Mar 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3342169 | May 1985 | DE |
202010001659 | Aug 2010 | DE |
202020004179 | Nov 2020 | DE |
3536191 | Sep 2019 | EP |
4066686 | Oct 2022 | EP |
394848 | Jul 1933 | GB |
2008011673 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009021250 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2016081986 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2019063720 | Apr 2019 | WO |