The present disclosure relates generally to a formulation in the form of an emulsion which includes a combination gum blend and a salt tolerant emulsifier, and items using same. The combination provides physical stability to an emulsion containing both zinc salts and silicone oil. The formulation of the present disclosure is useful for rash prevention and may be applied to the skin with a wipe wetted therewith or by other various means.
Wet wipes have been used for years for convenient skin cleansing between diaper changes. Much headway has been made in creating formulations for wet wipes. Such formulations are in the form of emulsions which provide a vehicle for the application of active ingredients to the skin. Such ingredients may be used to treat and/or prevent diaper rash.
Diaper rash is a form of contact dermatitis which afflicts infants or incontinent persons whose wet and/or soiled absorbent garments are not promptly changed. Because of the practical impossibility of attending promptly to all of a person's needs, even those receiving a high level of care sometimes suffer from diaper rash. It has recently come to be understood that the initial stages of some types of diaper rash are the result of skin irritation caused by contact with digestive enzymes present in feces, particularly trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase. These enzymes are proteolytic enzymes produced in the gastrointestinal tract to digest food. Similar conditions conducive to skin irritation by proteolytic enzymes present in feces are found in patients having colostomies. Such patients would also benefit from improved treatments to prevent skin irritation due to fecal enzymes.
Silicone oil is a commonly used active ingredient that acts as a skin barrier to prevent diaper rash. While there are several methods to achieve stable emulsions with silicone oil at concentrations compliant with its use as an over-the-counter drug, there are several disadvantages associated with these methods. First, the concentration of emulsifier required to successfully stabilize an emulsion containing the silicone oil, e.g. dimethicone, can be so great that it is cost prohibitive. Second, obtaining a low-viscosity, sprayable solution can be difficult due to the high probability that silicone oil droplets will coalesce, particularly at the elevated temperatures to which the solution may be exposed. Third, without appropriately modifying the rheology of the water phase, emulsions with a low viscosity and low solids content tend to undergo phase separation, particularly following a freeze-thaw cycle. This results in a non-uniform product that would not be efficacious.
Sometimes a skin barrier alone is not enough to prevent diaper rash, especially when fecal matter is present. Therefore, it is also desirable to inhibit skin irritants such as proteolytic enzymes. One way to inhibit such enzymes is to apply a water-soluble zinc salt to the skin. Zinc has long been known to sooth irritated skin/prevent skin irritation. However, zinc salts are not very compatible with silicone oils because when combined together in an emulsion, the emulsion can phase separate due to the increased ionic strength.
Accordingly, there is a need for an emulsion that contains silicone oil as an active ingredient and does not phase separate even in the presence of zinc salts. There is a further need to stabilize an emulsion containing silicone oil in a manner that is cost effective. It would be further advantageous if the emulsion would be suitable for spraying onto a substrate during the manufacture of a wet wipe. In addition, there is a need to preserve the emulsion without causing phase separation, especially if the emulsion is to be applied to a substrate.
It has now been unexpectedly found that stable emulsions containing both silicone oil and zinc salts can be formed with a salt-tolerant emulsifier and a gum blend. In particular, the gum blend contains one or more gums and propylene glycol alginate. One or more of the following gums may be suitable: xanthan gum, guar gum, gellan gum, acacia gum, cellulose gum, dehydroxanthan gum, sclerotium gum and locust bean gum. The emulsion is not only stable, but has a viscosity that is low enough to be sprayable for the purpose of applying it to a wipe substrate.
Without being bound by theory, it is believed that propylene glycol alginate in combination with one or more gums provide improved freeze-thaw stability by not only increasing the density of the water phase, but by imparting additional emulsification. Further, the gums are also salt tolerant as opposed to typical rheology modifiers like acrylates, carbomer, polyquaternium-37, etc.
An emulsion for the prevention of skin irritation, the emulsion including: a salt-tolerant emulsifier;
a gum blend comprising a gum and propylene glycol alginate, wherein the gum blend is 0.01% to 0.5% by weight of the emulsion; 1% to 10% by weight silicone oil; 90% to 98% by weight water; and 0.20 to 10% by weight water-soluble zinc salt. The emulsion may be applied to a substrate.
Advantages of the composition of the present disclosure include at least the following: cost effectiveness due to lower concentrations of emulsifier, the capability of being applied to a wipe substrate by spraying, and physical stability.
The present disclosure is directed to an emulsion used for the prevention of skin irritation including among other ingredients, an “emulsifier system”. The emulsifier system is an emulsifier in combination with a gum blend and propylene glycol alginate. Surprisingly, the emulsion, with its emulsifier system, stays physically stable when water-soluble zinc salts and dimethicone (about 1% to about 10% by weight) are combined in the emulsion.
Generally, the emulsion of the present disclosure contains a carrier medium, a barrier composition, an emulsifier system, and a stability enhancing system. Additional ingredients, e.g. fragrance, botanicals, pH adjusting agents, buffers, preservatives, moisturizers and the like may be added to the emulsion.
Carrier Medium:
Desirably, water serves as a medium for carrying the silicone oil and zinc salts to the skin in an esthetically pleasing manner and at a suitable viscosity as discussed herein. In addition, water aids in the wetting of the substrate of the wipe product incorporating the emulsion. Typically, the emulsions of the present disclosure include from about 90% by weight to about 98% by weight water, including from about 92% by weight to about 97% by weight, and including from about 94% by weight to about 96% by weight.
Barrier Composition:
The emulsions include a barrier composition that serves to protect the skin from the digestive enzymes. Barrier composition components include silicone oils and water-soluble zinc salts.
Silicone Oil
The emulsions of the present disclosure include silicone oil sometimes referred to as polymerized dimethylsiloxane. The silicone oil is an active ingredient that functions primarily as a skin protectant as it provides a barrier against moisture (urine, sweat and overall humidity), and secondarily as an emollient. Desirable silicone oils are those that impart a tactile impression of softness and smoothness, and which do not impart an excessive tactile perception of greasiness, oiliness or coating when incorporated into the emulsion. Non-volatile silicone oils may be desirable over volatile silicone oils. Non-volatile silicone oils tend to remain stable when exposed to the environment, tend to provide a lasting tactile impression and tend to form a stable oil layer on the skin. Mixtures of silicone oils may be used. For example, volatile silicone oils may be combined with non-volatile silicone oils to impart desired esthetic properties, as long as the emulsion contains sufficient non-volatile silicone to provide a skin barrier layer that is effective for a given application.
In one aspect, the silicone oil is dimethicone (linear polydimethylsiloxane). In this aspect of the disclosure, the emulsions of the present disclosure include from about 1% by weight to about 10% by weight dimethicone, including from about 1% by weight to about 5% by weight, and including from about 1% by weight to about 3% by weight. Other exemplary silicone oils that are suitable for use herein include dimethiconol, ethoxylated dimethicone (linear and pendant varieties), amodimethicone and derivatives thereof, cyclomethicone, alkyl substituted derivatives such as stearyl dimethicone and behenyl dimethicone, phenyl trimethicone and mixtures thereof. Such silicones are commercially available, for example, from the Dow Corning Company of Midland, Mich. under the names XIAMETER PMX-200 Silicone Fluid (Dimethicone), XIAMETER PMX-1184 Silicone Fluid (Trisiloxane and Dimethicone), DOW CORNING 1403 Fluid (Dimethicone and Dimethiconol), DOW CORNING 1501 Fluid (Cyclopentasiloxane and Dimethiconol), DOW CORNING 593 Fluid (Dimethicone and Trimethylsiloxysilicate), DOW CORNING 2502 Fluid (Cetyl Dimethicone), and DOW CORNING 558 Fluid (Phenyl Trimethicone).
Zinc Salt
In one aspect of the present disclosure, desired sources of zinc ions are zinc chloride and zinc sulfate. In other aspects of the present disclosure, sources of zinc ions include non-covalent zinc compounds such as zinc acetate, zinc carbonate, zinc nitrate, zinc phosphate, zinc hydroxide, zinc fluoride, zinc bromide, zinc iodide, zinc sulfite, zinc citrate, zinc lactate, zinc salicylate, zinc gluconate, zinc glycinate, zinc glutamate, and zinc stearate. Zinc oxide, a covalent zinc compound, is specifically excluded.
Desirably, the zinc compounds, salts, are about 0.20% to about 10% by weight of the emulsion.
Emulsifier System:
In addition to the carrier and the barrier composition, the emulsions of the present disclosure include an emulsifier system for forming oil-in-water emulsions. The emulsifier system is a synergistic combination of specific ingredients which stabilize other formulation components that would not otherwise mix together in a stable manner. It is capable of de-emulsifying upon application of the complete formulation to the skin thereby delivering a silicone oil film on the skin. The emulsifier system does not tend to re-emulsify once the emulsion is applied to the skin and exposed to urine or other body fluids. This prevents the silicone oil from being washed away when an insult occurs.
Specifically, the emulsifier system contains a select group of phosphate esters along with two additional components, (a) a salt-tolerant emulsifier and (b) a gum-blend.
Salt-Tolerant Emulsifier
A desirable emulsifying agent based on phosphate esters is similar in structure to the phospholipids found in the skin. Hence, it is substantive and compatible with the skin's natural lipids. Like phospholipids, dialkyl phosphate esters have surfactant characteristics that tend to promote the formation of bilayers or lamellar structures.
Emulsifying agents based on phosphate esters are formed by reacting phosphoric acid or its derivatives with a fatty alcohol(s), such as cetearyl alcohol, cetyl alcohol, or behenyl alcohol resulting in an anionic compound. Phosphate esters are well known for their ability to retain active ingredients of interest, such as sunscreens or, in the present invention, ingredients to protect the skin from environmental insults, such as fecal enzymes. As described herein, select anionic phosphate ester emulsifiers were compatible with zinc salts, which disperse cationic zinc ions when dissolved in the emulsion.
Desirably, the phosphate ester linkage is very stable at high and low pH, giving it extreme pH tolerance. The emulsion characteristic of the ester depends on the degree of neutralization of the free acid groups.
The phosphate ester is a mid-range HLB emulsifier that is used to achieve low viscosity dispersions of small and uniform particles. It produces stable and well-dispersed systems even in products that contain a relatively high load of pigments and oils. The phosphate ester maintains consistency over time and is much less sensitive to shear rate. Further, it forms emulsions without foaming and can easily be incorporated into the oil phase. Generally, phosphate esters are used as primary emulsifying agents for formulations at weight percentages of 0.5% to 5%. Additionally, phosphate esters can also be incorporated at lower levels as co-emulsifiers. Phosphate ester is present in a desired amount of about 0.5 to about 3% by weight of the emulsion, and even more desirably about 0.75% to about 2% by weight of the emulsion.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a desired phosphate ester is available from Croda Inc. as CRODAFOS CS20A.
Gemini Surfactants
Gemini surfactants are a special class of surfactants that contains multiple hydrophobic tails and multiple hydrophilic head groups within the same molecule. Gemini surfactants can be ten to a thousand times more surface active than conventional surfactants with similar but single hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups in the molecule. Gemini surfactants may reduce skin irritation in addition to serving as an emulsifier.
Many Gemini surfactants were explored in an effort to create a stable emulsion containing dimethicone and clay, surprisingly, the only Gemini surfactant that was found to work in an emulsion having 95.15% water was Disodium Ethylene Dicocamide PEG-15 Disulfate. In one aspect of the disclosure the Gemini surfactant is blended with Behenyl Alcohol, Glyceryl Stearate and Glyceryl Stearate Citrate, and is available in this form from Sasol North America, Inc. as CERALUTION H. The Gemini surfactant is limited to the oil phase.
Gemini surfactants are believed to form liquid crystalline lamellar gel networks in the oil phase which result in the formation of very small oil droplets. The small size and gel-like nature of the droplets provides resistance against coalescence of the droplets eventuating in complete oil phase separation. In addition, Gemini surfactants have been shown to not have the HLB dependency for oil emulsification of typical ethoxylated fatty alcohols, ethoxylated fatty esters, and other common non-Gemini emulsifiers.
Stability Enhancing System:
The stability enhancing system is a gum blend which includes a single gum or multiple gums and propylene glycol alginate. One desirable gum blend is made from xanthan gum and guar gum. In certain applications, it may be advantageous to substitute the xanthan gum and/or guar gum with gellan gum, acacia gum, cellulose gum, dehydroxanthan gum, sclerotium gum or locust bean gum.
Without being bound by theory, it is believed that propylene glycol alginate improves freeze-thaw stability by not only increasing the density of the water phase, but by imparting additional emulsification of the silicone oil.
Desirably, the gum blend is used in an amount between about 0.01% to about 0.5% by weight of the emulsion.
Gums are rheological modifiers. Other classes of rheological modifiers such as starches may be used in combination with propylene glycol alginate provided that a stable emulsion is achieved using less than 0.5% by weight rheological modifiers and the viscosity of the formulation measures below 5,000 cps as obtained using a Brookfield DV-II Viscometer with spindle 5 at 6 r.p.m.
Optional Ingredients:
1) pH Adjusting Agent
The emulsions of the present disclosure may further include a pH-adjusting agent. Such agents are desirable for the creation of emulsions that have a pH at or near that of human skin. Therefore, the pH will typically be adjusted as may be necessary to provide the emulsion of the present disclosure with a pH of from 4 to 7, more preferably from 4.5 to 6.5. The pH can be adjusted by adding one or more pH-adjusting agents in an amount effective to provide such pH values (“effective amount”). Agents that may be used to adjust the pH of the emulsions include organic and inorganic acids and bases. In one aspect of the present disclosure, a more desirable pH-adjusting agent is malic acid.
For the more desirable emulsions of the present disclosure, the emulsion in the absence of a pH-adjusting agent tends to be more basic than desired. Therefore, an acid pH-adjusting agent will typically be used to bring the emulsion to the desired pH. Acid pH-adjusting agents include organic acids, desirably that are relatively non-irritating. Such acids include malic acid, citric acid acetic acid, propionic acid, oxalic acid, glycolic acid, malonic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid, tartaric acid, aspartic acid, maleic acid, glutaric acid, glutamic acid, gluconic acid, sorbic acid, benzoic acid, ascorbic acid, salicylic acid and mixtures thereof.
The amount of the pH-adjusting agent that is employed depends on the equivalent weight of the pH-adjusting agent and the desired pH. Typically, the pH-adjusting agent is used in an amount of from about 0.05% to about 0.5% by weight of the emulsion. Desirable emulsions of the present disclosure include from about 0.1% to about 0.5% percent, typically about 0.2% to about 0.3% percent the pH-adjusting agent.
2) Preservatives
Preservatives function in one or more ways to improve the shelf life of the emulsions and products incorporating same. For example, the preservative may be an anti-microbial agent, an anti-bacterial agent, an anti-fungal agent, or a combination thereof.
Anti-microbial agents herein include, but are not limited to, benzethonium chloride, benzisothiazolinone, benzoic acid, benzyl alcohol, 2-Bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, butylparaben, caprylyl glycol, chlorhexidine digluconate, DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea, dehydroacetic acid, ethylparaben, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, Methylparaben, Pentylene glycol, phenethyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, propylparaben, polyaminopropyl biguanide, quaternium-15, salicylic acid, sodium benzoate, sodium methylparaben, sodium dehydroacetate, thymol, triclosan and mixtures thereof.
In one aspect of the disclosure, benzoic acid is used with or without phenoxyethanol. These compounds are effective in preventing the growth of a wide variety of microbes, and are efficacious against the growth of fungi. Protecting against microbes and fungi tends to be particularly desirable where the wipe product contains a porous substrate, for example, nonwoven substrates.
Desirably, wet wipes have a shelf life of at least two years under storage conditions of about 75 degrees Fahrenheit and 50 percent relative humidity. Certain agents may be employed to achieve the desired term, one of which is an anti-microbial agent. The anti-microbial agent may be used in an amount that is effective to provide the desired shelf life (storage stability, i.e., microorganisms do not grow to a significant extent) (herein alternatively referred to as “an effective amount”). This includes demonstrating sufficient anti-microbial activity in accordance with United States Pharmacopeia test entitled “Microbial Test, Antimicrobial Preservative-Effectiveness”.
3) Other
The emulsion of the present disclosure may optionally include other ingredients, e.g., fragrance; skin soothing aids such as aloe, lavender, chamomile, green tea, calendula, etc.; skin moisturizers (humectants) such as glycerin, propylene glycol, betaine, and hydroxyethyl urea; or emollients other than those previously described; powders and the like.
Viscosity:
While the examples herein show a highly aqueous emulsion, it is noted that emulsions with lower levels of water and thus higher viscosities may be desired, especially when applied to the skin by means other than a wet wipe. For instance, the emulsion may be formulated to be a lotion, gel or paste. However, for application to wipe substrates as disclosed herein, it is desirable to have a viscosity at 25 degrees Celsius of about 5000 centipoise (cps) or less, or in other applications, 4000 cps or less as obtained using a Brookfield DV-II Viscometer with spindle 5 at 6 r.p.m.
Table 1: Stable, Highly Aqueous Low-Viscosity Dimethicone Emulsions.
Table 2: Effect of 0.9% Zinc Chloride on Emulsion Stability.
Table 3: Effect of Zinc Chloride Concentration on Stability of Emulsion Stability.
Table 4: Effect of Zinc Sulfate Concentration on Stability of Emulsion Stability.
Table 1 lists ten emulsions (F1-F10) that demonstrated adequate stability following freeze/thaw testing according to the methods described herein. Generally, stability of the emulsion was tested for a minimum of four weeks at 50 degrees Celsius, three months at 40 degrees Celsius and 5 degrees Celsius. Three Freeze/thaw cycles are listed in Table 1 below. Three freeze/thaw cycles were applied to each emulsion at these two different temperatures.
In addition to the emulsifiers provided in Table 1, additional emulsifiers were screened between 1% and 3% by weight alone or in combination with one another with the other ingredients remaining constant in the emulsion. Emulsifiers that failed to produce a stable emulsion include: Glyceryl Stearate, Glyceryl Stearate/PEG-100 Stearate, Sorbitan Sesquioleate, Sorbitan Olivate, Undeceth-3, PEG-20 Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate, Trideceth-3, Trideceth-12, Laureth-9, Behenoyl Stearic Acid, Oleth-2, Oleth-20, Sorbitan Laurate, Sorbitan Palmitate, Sorbitan Oleate, Sorbitan Trioleate, Steareth-2, Steareth-20, Steareth-21, Laureth-23, C11-15 Pareth-15, PPG-24-Buteth-27, High molecular weight polymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, PPG-5-Ceteth-10 Phosphate, Oleth-5 Phosphate, Dioleyl Phosphate, Oleth-3 Phosphate, Oleth-10 Phosphate, Lauryl Phosphate, Trideceth-3 Phosphate, Trideceth-6 Phosphate, Deceth-6 Phosphate, Trilaureth-4 Phosphate, C20-22 Alkyl Phosphate, C20-22 Alcohols, Polyglyceryl-10 Decaoleate, Polyglyceryl-3 Oleate, PEG/PPG-20/6 Dimethicone, Bis-PEG/PPG-20/20 Dimethicone, Bis-PEG/PPG-16/16 PEG/PPG-16/16 Dimethicone, Bis-PEG/PPG-20/5 PEG/PPG-20/5 Dimethicone, Methoxy PEG/PPG-25/4 Dimethicone, Bis-PEG/PPG-14/14 Dimethicone (and) Dimethicone, PEG-11 Methyl Ether Dimethicone, PEG/PPG-20/22 Butyl Ether Dimethicone, Lauryl PEG-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Polyglyceryl-3 Disiloxane Dimethicone, Lauryl Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, Lauryl PEG-8 Dimethicone, Sodium Stearate, Sucrose Laurate, Sucrose Myristate, Sucrose Stearate and Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate. Unexpectedly, use of Disodium Ethylene Dicocamide PEG-15 Disulfate as the only Gemini surfactant in a system containing 94.15% water produced a stable emulsion.
In general, the procedure for making the emulsions is as follows:
Additional testing demonstrated one way to achieve a stable low viscosity formulation through three freeze-thaw cycles at elevated temperatures was through use of a combination of one or more gums and propylene glycol alginate. This combination is present in a concentration greater than 0.05% such that the aggregate sum of these components do not exceed 0.50% weight of the finished formulation. Additional water phase rheology modifiers that were evaluated alone or in combination with other rheology modifiers but did not produce a stable emulsions include: Citrus Aurantium Sinensis (Orange) Fiber, Acacia Seyal Gum Octenylsuccinate, Behenoxy PEG-10 Dimethicone, Bentonite, Disteareth-75 IPDI, Galactoarabinan, gums (Gellan Gum, Guar gum, Cellulose Gum and Gum Acacia) that are not in combination with propylene glycol alginate, Hydroxyethyl Cellulose, Hydroxypropyl Starch Phosphate, Laponite XLS, Magnessium Aluminum Silicate, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Montmorillonite, PEG-150 Distearate, PEG-175 Diisostearate, PEG-20 Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate, Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6, Potato Starch Modified, Propylene Glycol Alginate, Sodium Alginate, Sodium Aluminum Silicate, Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose, Tromethamine Magnesium Aluminum Silicate and Xanthan Gum.
Emulsions F1-F10 included 0.9% by weight Zinc Chloride in an effort to determine whether the previously stable base would remain stable through 3 freeze thaw cycles and 50 degrees Celsius for a minimum of 2 weeks. As shown by Table 2 below, surprisingly, only the formulation containing Ceralution H with a combination of Xanthan Gum, Guar Gum and Propylene Glycol Alginate remained stable when exposed to the aforementioned stability conditions. It is known that ionic materials can negatively impact the stability provided by polysaccharide materials for sprayable, low viscosity emulsions (See, U.S. Pat. No. 6,831,107).
A subsequent dosage study using zinc chloride or zinc sulfate with Formulation 10 demonstrated that a significant amount of zinc could be added to the formulation and remain stable. The results of this study are shown in Tables 3 and 4.
As shown in Tables 3 and 4, emulsions with Zinc Sulfate had superior freeze/thaw stability performance compared to solutions with Zinc Chloride. Following three months at 40 degrees Celsius, the viscosity of all of the above emulsions remained between 1000 and 5000 centipoise as measured with a Brookfield viscometer (RV Spindle 5, 6 rpm) available from Brookfield Engineering Laboratories.
Similar stability results were obtained with emulsions containing 1% CRODAFOS CS20A available from Croda Inc.)
Wipe Substrates and Emulsion Add-On Levels
As used herein, the term “substrate” means any material suitable for carrying the emulsion of the present disclosure. Suitable substrates include any material that does not hinder the deposition of desirable emulsion components onto the skin, and does not cause skin irritation.
Examples of suitable substrates include, but are not limited to, woven or non-woven webs, spunbonded fabric, meltblown fabric, knit fabric, wet-laid fabric, scrims, needle-punched webs, synthetic fibers and natural fibers. It is to be understood that these suitable substrates are not mutually exclusive and can be used in a combination.
The choice of substrate fibers depends upon, for example, fiber cost and the desired properties. For example suitable fibrous materials may include, but are not limited to, synthetic fibers such as those derived from polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, polyacrylics, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl, etc., alone or in combination with one another. Similarly, natural fibers such as cotton, linen, hemp, jute, wool, wood pulp, etc.; regenerated cellulosic fibers such as viscose rayon and cuprammonium rayon or modified cellulosic fibers, such as cellulose acetate may likewise be used. Blends of one or more of the above fibers may also be used if so desired.
As used herein, the term “nonwoven fabric” refers to a fabric having a structure of individual fibers or filaments which are randomly and/or unidirectionally interlaid in a mat-like fashion. Nonwoven fabrics can be made from a variety of processes including, but not limited to, air-laid processes, wet-laid processes, hydroentangling processes, staple fiber carding and bonding, and solution spinning. Suitable nonwoven fabrics include, but are not limited to, spunbonded fabrics, meltblown fabrics, wet-laid fabrics and combinations thereof.
As used herein, the term “spunbonded fabric” refers to a web of small diameter fibers and/or filaments which are formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material, or coextruding more than one molten thermoplastic material, as filaments from a plurality of fine, usually circular, capillaries in a spinnerette with the diameter of the extruded filaments then being rapidly reduced, for example, by non-eductive or eductive fluid-drawing or other well-known spunbonding mechanisms. The production of spunbonded nonwoven webs is well-known and illustrated in patents such as Appel, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563; Dorschner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,692,618; Kinney, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,338,992 and 3,341,394; Levy, U.S. Pat. No. 3,276,944; Petersen, U.S. Pat. No. 3,502,538; Hartman, U.S. Pat. No. 3,502,763; Dobo et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,542,615; and Harmon, Canadian Pat. No. 803,714.
As used herein, the term “meltblown fabrics” refers to a fabric comprising fibers formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, die capillaries as molten threads or filaments into a high velocity gas (e.g. air) stream which attenuates the filaments of molten thermoplastic material to reduce their diameters, which may be to microfiber diameter. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high-velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface to form a web of randomly disbursed meltblown fibers. The meltblown process is well-known and is described in various patents such as U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,241 to Butin, et al.
As used herein, the term “microfibers” means small diameter fibers having an average diameter not greater than about 100 microns, for example, having a diameter of from about 0.5 microns to about 50 microns. More specifically microfibers may also have an average diameter of from about 1 micron to about 20 microns. Microfibers having an average diameter of about 3 microns or less are commonly referred to as ultra-fine microfibers.
As used herein, the term “wet-laid fabrics” refers to fabrics formed by a process, such as a paper-making process, wherein fibers dispersed in a liquid medium are deposited onto a screen such that the liquid medium flows through the screen, leaving a fabric on the surface of the screen. Fiber bonding agents may be applied to the fibers in the liquid medium or after being deposited onto the screen. Wet-laid fabrics may contain natural and/or synthetic fibers.
As used herein, the term “spunlaced fabrics” refers to a web of material consisting of a blend of natural fibers and synthetic fibers, where the fibers are subjected to high-velocity water jets which entangle the fibers to achieve mechanical bonding. Desirably, the natural fibers are wood pulp fibers and the synthetic fibers are polyester fibers.
As used herein, the terms “needle-punched” and “needled” refer to a web of material consisting of one or more fibrous materials, wherein the fibers are subjected to needles which entangle the fibers to achieve mechanical interlocking without the need for adhesives or chemical additives.
As used herein, the term “woven fabric” refers to a fabric containing a structure of fibers, filaments or yarns, which are orderly arranged in an interengaged fashion. Woven fabrics typically contain interengaged fibers in a “warp” and “fill” direction. The warp direction corresponds to the length of the fabric while the fill direction corresponds to the width of the fabric. Woven fabrics can be made on a variety of looms including, but not limited to, shuttle looms, Rapier looms, projectile looms, air jet looms and water jet looms.
The composition of the present disclosure formulation may be incorporated into the basesheet in an add-on amount of from about 50% (by weight of the basesheet) to about 800% (by weight of the basesheet). More specifically, the formulations may be incorporated into the basesheet in an add-on amount of from about 200% (by weight of the basesheet) to about 600% (by weight of the basesheet) or from about 300% (by weight of the basesheet) to about 600% (by weight of the basesheet). The formulation add-on amounts may vary depending on the composition of the basesheet.
Experimental Methods:
Stability Test
The purpose of this test is to demonstrate formulation stability after exposure to potential freezing conditions such as during shipping or storage. The test is performed by freezing the composition at 20 degrees Celsius. Once frozen, the emulsion is allowed to completely thaw at room temperature. This freeze-thaw cycle is conducted for a total of three times. The test results are determined by visual inspection of the emulsion for phase separation.
When introducing elements of the present disclosure or the preferred embodiment(s) thereof, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the disclosure are achieved and other advantageous results attained.
As various changes could be made in the above formulations without departing from the scope of the disclosure, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 61/666,382, filed on Jun. 29, 2012. The entirety of Provisional Patent Application No. 61/666,382 is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3896807 | Buchalter | Jul 1975 | A |
4382919 | Alonso et al. | May 1983 | A |
4690821 | Smith et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4772501 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4806572 | Kellett | Feb 1989 | A |
4904524 | Yoh | Feb 1990 | A |
5110593 | Benford | May 1992 | A |
5362488 | Sibley et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5385748 | Bunger et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5436007 | Hartung et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5525346 | Hartung et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5585104 | Ha et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5643588 | Roe et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648083 | Blieszner et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5858335 | Lucas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861145 | Lucas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861147 | Dodd et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863663 | Mackey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5874067 | Lucas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5968025 | Roe et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985177 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6083854 | Bogdanski et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103245 | Clark et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6153208 | McAtee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6280757 | McAtee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284257 | Khayat et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287581 | Krzysik et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303119 | Weisgerber et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6352700 | Luu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6410039 | Walker | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416788 | Barr | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419963 | Niazi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436418 | Sheldon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440437 | Krzysik et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461601 | Stoddart et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488943 | Beerse et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500443 | Otts et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503524 | Tyrrell et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544573 | Pajela et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6603053 | Hisanaka | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6638527 | Gott et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6696070 | Dunn | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6803496 | Elder et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6831107 | Dederen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6894028 | Lipton et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7122238 | Macedo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147751 | Shannon et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169400 | Luu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195771 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7358279 | Goget et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365030 | Chamba et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7416735 | El-Nokaly et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7592019 | Drucks et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7651691 | Roso et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7838477 | Wenzel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7951840 | Modak et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20020025334 | Smith | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020120242 | Tyrrell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165508 | Klofta et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030035785 | Palumbo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045645 | Chang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030082223 | Healy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030124373 | Weuthen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030165449 | Kaczvinsky et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220042 | Lostocco et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040052834 | West et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058073 | Bunyard et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040122389 | Mace et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040166183 | Ruseler-Van et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040242097 | Hasenoehrl et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002994 | Goppel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008680 | Deckner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008681 | Deckner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013790 | Yamaki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031653 | Kwetkat et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031847 | Martens et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036960 | Bussey et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048105 | McNulty et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058672 | Gupta | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050158369 | Dorschner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060159645 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171971 | Marsh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193819 | Lu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210612 | Simon et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070020342 | Modak et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070141127 | Casas-Sanchez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070254543 | Bunyard et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080145664 | Sirovatka et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146484 | Sirovatka et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080207767 | Dobos et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080299065 | Arditty | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090035229 | Eirew | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090035340 | Landa et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090081269 | Erazo-Majewicz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090181070 | Blease et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090226498 | Flugge-Berendes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263439 | Casas-Sanchez et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100158964 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110033413 | Kwetkat et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110224637 | Edgett et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110268777 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110318434 | Guthery | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120090113 | Manifold et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20140004163 | Mundschau et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140004166 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 117 613 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 564 307 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0 922 452 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 922 456 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 192 955 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 014 938 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 618 925 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 992 367 | Nov 2008 | EP |
01-079108 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01-265019 | Oct 1989 | JP |
WO 1997038735 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 1999024551 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 1999042131 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 1999055303 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 2001028339 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 2001062224 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2002060502 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2005044220 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2006081071 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007144814 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008129494 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009125405 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kamath et al. “Spunlace (hydroentanglement)” (Apr. 2004), [online], retrieved on [Sep. 2, 2014] from URL <http://www.engr.utk.edu/mse/Textiles/Spunlace.htm>. |
Runhe Sea Melody Wet Wipes, sold on Mintel web page “http://www.gnpd.com”, Jun. 2010, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140004164 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61666382 | Jun 2012 | US |