Patent Application
20160289653
This disclosure is directed towards improved enzymes, and enzyme formulations.
The use of active agents, such as enzymes, in detergents, foods, and animal feed has become a common practice. There is an ongoing need in these industries for stable enzyme granules that maintain activity after being subjected to harsh conditions.
Approaches to avoid the problem of irreversibly inactivating enzymes or reducing the activity of the enzyme in industrial processes include identifying new sources of an enzyme (e.g. the identification of a known enzyme in an extreme thermophile microorganism) or identifying means to stabilize known enzymes. Klibanov, 1983, (Stabilization of Enzymes against Thermal Inactivation, Advances in Applied Microbiology, volume 29, page 1-28) discloses that there are three basic means for stabilizing enzymes: (1) immobilization, (2) chemical modification and (3) inclusion of additives. While previous formulation approaches have made some progress in this area (see for example WO9854980, WO9739116, WO2007044968), and EP1996028) the present teachings make an additional advance in overcoming some of these problems by recognizing that for certain enzymes reduced glycation can improve enzyme stability.
For ease of reference we have described elements of the present teachings under one or more headings. It is to be noted that the teachings under each of the headings also apply to the teachings under the other headings. For example, each of the stated embodiments and aspects concerning the use of the present teachings is equally an embodiment or aspect concerning the method of the present teachings or the composition of the present teachings. Likewise, each of the stated embodiments and aspects concerning the method or use of the present teachings is equally an embodiment or aspect concerning the composition of the present teachings.
All patents, patent applications, publications, documents, and articles cited herein are all incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The present teachings provide improved enzymes, formulated enzymes, and methods of making them.
The practice of the present teachings will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional techniques of molecular biology (including recombinant techniques), microbiology, cell biology, biochemistry, and animal feed pelleting, which are within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature, for example, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, second edition (Sambrook et al., 1989); Oligonucleotide Synthesis (M. J. Gait, ed., 1984; Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (F. M. Ausubel et al., eds., 1994); PCR: The Polymerase Chain Reaction (Mullis et al., eds., 1994); Gene Transfer and Expression: A Laboratory Manual (Kriegler, 1990), and Fairfield, D. 1994. Chapter 10, Pelleting Cost Center. In Feed Manufacturing Technology IV. (McEllhiney, editor), American Feed Industry Association, Arlington, Va., pp. 110-139.
Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the present teachings belong. Singleton, et al., Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, second ed., John Wiley and Sons, N.Y. (1994), and Hale & Markham, The Harper Collins Dictionary of Biology, Harper Perennial, N.Y. (1991) provide one of skill with a general dictionary of many of the terms used in this invention. Any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present teachings.
Numeric ranges provided herein are inclusive of the numbers defining the range.
As used herein, the term “granule” refers to a particle which contains a core, an active agent, and at least one coating layer.
As used herein, the term “core” refers to the inner nucleus of a granule. The cores of the present teachings may be produced by a variety of fabrication techniques including: rotary atomization, wet granulation, dry granulation, spray drying, disc granulation, extrusion, pan coating, spheronization, drum granulation, fluid-bed agglomeration, high-shear granulation, fluid-bed spray coating, crystallization, precipitation, emulsion gelation, spinning disc atomization and other casting approaches, and prill processes. Such processes are known in the art and are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,297 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,649 (fluid bed processing); EP656058B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 454,332 (extrusion process); U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,706 (granulation, high-shear); and EP804532B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,466 (combination processes utilizing a fluid bed core and mixer coating).
The core may include the enzyme, which may or may not be coated around a seed. Suitable cores for use in the present teachings are preferably a hydratable or porous material (i.e., a material which is dispersible or soluble in water) that is a feed grade material. The core material can either disperse in water (disintegrate when hydrated) or solubilize in water by going into a true aqueous solution. Clays (for example, the phyllosilicates bentonite, kaolin, montmorillonite, hectorite, saponite, beidellite, attapulgite, and stevensite), silicates, such as sand (sodium silicate), nonpareils and agglomerated potato starch or flour, or other starch granule sources such as wheat and corn cobs are considered dispersible. (Nonpareils are spherical particles made of a seed crystal that has been built onto and rounded into a spherical shape by binding layers of powder and solute to the seed crystal in a rotating spherical container. Nonpareils are typically made from a combination of a sugar such as sucrose, and a powder such as cornstarch.) In one embodiment of the present teachings the core comprises a sodium chloride or sodium sulfate crystal, also referred to as a seed, or other inorganic salt crystal. In another embodiment of the present teachings, the core comprises a sucrose crystal seed. Particles composed of inorganic salts and/or sugars and/or small organic molecules may be used as the cores of the present teachings. Suitable water soluble ingredients for incorporation into cores include: inorganic salts such as sodium chloride, ammonium sulfate, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, zinc sulfate; or urea, citric acid, sugars such as sucrose, lactose and the like. Cores of the present teachings may further comprise one or more of the following: additional active agents, feed or food grade polymers, fillers, plasticizers, fibrous materials, extenders and other compounds known to be used in cores. Suitable polymers include polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), including partially and fully hydrolyzed PVA, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, polyvinyl pyrrolidine, and carbohydrate polymers (such as starch, amylose, amylopectin, alpha and beta-glucans, pectin, glycogen), including mixtures and derivatives thereof. Suitable fillers useful in the cores include inert materials used to add bulk and reduce cost, or used for the purpose of adjusting the intended enzyme activity in the finished granule. Examples of such fillers include, but are not limited to, water soluble agents such as salts, sugars and water dispersible agents such as clays, talc, silicates, cellulose and starches, and cellulose and starch derivatives. Suitable plasticizers useful in the cores of the present teachings are low molecular weight organic compounds and are highly specific to the polymer being plasticized. Examples include, but are not limited to, sugars (such as, glucose, fructose and sucrose), sugar alcohols (such as, sorbitol, xylitol and maltitol and other glycols), polar low molecular weight organic compounds, such as urea, or other known plasticizers such as water or feed grade plasticizers. Suitable fibrous materials useful in the cores of the present teachings include, but are not limited to: cellulose, and cellulose derivatives such as HPMC (hydroxy-propyl-methyl cellulose), CMC (carboxy-methyl cellulose), HEC (hydroxy-ethyl cellulose). In another embodiment particularly suitable for household cleaning applications, the core comprises a water-soluble or dispersible sugar or salt crystal or a non pareil. Those skilled in the art will recognize that, for feed and food applications, the cores (and any polymers, fillers, plasticizers, fibrous materials, and extenders), are acceptable for food and/or feed applications. For household cleaning applications, such a restriction need not apply.
Any enzyme susceptible to problematic glycation may be used according to the present teachings, as readily assessed by one of skill in the art, and a nonlimiting list of enzymes may include phytases, xylanases, β-glucanases, phosphatases, proteases, amylases (alpha or beta or glucoamylases) cellulases, lipases, cutinases, oxidases, transferases, reductases, hemicellulases, mannanases, esterases, isomerases, pectinases, lactases, peroxidases, laccases, other redox enzymes and mixtures thereof. Particularly preferred enzymes may include a xylanase from Trichoderma reesei and a variant xylanase from Trichoderma reesei, both available from DuPont Industrial Biosciences or the inherently thermostable xylanase described in EP1222256B1, as well as other xylanases from Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus kawachii, Aspergillus tubigensis, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Neocallimastix patriciarum,Penicillium species, Streptomyces lividans, Streptomyces thermoviolaceus, Thermomonospora fusca, Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma reesei, Trichoderma viride. Additional enzymes may include phytases, such as for example Finase L®, a phytase from Aspergillus sp., available from AB Enzymes, Darmstadt, Germany; Phyzyme™ XP, a phytase from E. Coli, available from DuPont Nutrition and Health, and other phytases from, for example, the following organisms: Trichoderma, Penicillium, Fusarium, Buttiauxella, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Penicillium, Humicola, Bacillus, and Peniophora, as well as those phytases described in U.S. patent applications 61/595,923 and 61/595,941, both filed Feb. 12, 2012. An example of a potential cellullase is Multifect® BGL, a cellulase (beta glucanase), available from DuPont Industrial Biosciences and other cellulases from species such as Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Penicillium, Humicola, Bacillus, Cellulomonas, Penicillium, Thermomonospore, Clostridium, and Hypocrea. The cellulases and endoglucanases described in US20060193897A1 also may be used. Commercially available cellulases that find use in the present include, but are not limited to CELLUZYME®, CAREZYME® (Novozymes), and KAC-500(B)™ (Kao Corporation). Amylases may be, for example, from species such as Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Penicillium, Bacillus, for instance, B. subtilis, B. stearothermophilus, B. lentus, B. licheniformis, B. coagulans, and B. amyloliquefaciens. Potentially suitable fungal amylases are derived from Aspergillus, such as A. oryzae and A. niger. Commercially available amylases that may find use in the present invention include, but are not limited to DURAMYL®, TERMAMYL®, FUNGAMYL®, STAINZYME®, STAINZYME PLUS®, STAINZYME ULTRA®, and BAN™ (Novozymes), as well as POWERASE™, RAPIDASE® and MAXAMYL® P (Genencor). Proteases may be from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Aspergillus and Trichoderma species. Phytases, xylanases, phosphatases, proteases, amylases, esterases, redox enzymes, lipases, transferases, cellulases, and β-glucanases are enzymes frequently used for inclusion in animal feed and may find application in the present teachings. Suitable proteases may include those of animal, vegetable or microbial origin. In some embodiments, microbial proteases may be used. In some embodiments, chemically or genetically modified mutants may be included. In some embodiments, the protease may be a serine protease, preferably an alkaline microbial protease or a trypsin-like protease. Examples of alkaline proteases may include subtilisins, especially those derived from Bacillus (e.g., subtilisin, lentus, amyloliquefaciens, subtilisin Carlsberg, subtilisin 309, subtilisin 147 and subtilisin 168). Additional examples may include those mutant proteases described in U.S. Pat. Nos. RE 34,606, 5,955,340, 5,700,676, 6,312,936, and 6,482,628, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional protease examples may include, but are not limited to trypsin (e.g., of porcine or bovine origin), and the Fusarium protease described in WO 89/06270. In some embodiments, commercially available protease enzymes that may find use in the present invention include, but are not limited to MAXATASE®, MAXACAL™, MAXAPEM™, OPTICLEAN®, OPTIMASE®, PROPERASE®, PURAFECT®, PURAFECT® OXP, PURAMAX™, EXCELLASE™, and PURAFAST™ (Genencor); ALCALASE®, SAVINASE®, PRIMASE®, DURAZYM™, POLARZYME®, OVOZYME®, KANNASE®, LIQUANASE®, NEUTRASE®, RELASE® and ESPERASE® (Novozymes); BLAP™ and BLAP™ variants (Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Duesseldorf, Germany), and KAP (B. alkalophilus subtilisin; Kao Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Various proteases are described in WO95/23221, WO 92/21760, WO 09/149200, WO 09/149144, WO 09/149145, WO 11/072099, WO 10/056640, WO 10/056653, WO 11/140364, WO 12/151534, U.S. Pat. Publ. No. 2008/0090747, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,801,039, 5,340,735, 5,500,364, 5,855,625, U.S. Pat. Nos. RE 34,606, 5,955,340, 5,700,676, 6,312,936, and 6,482,628, and various other patents. In some further embodiments, metalloproteases may find use in the present invention, including but not limited to the neutral metalloprotease described in WO 07/044993. Potential enzymes suitable for inclusion into detergents for household care applications are similar, particularly proteases, amylases, lipases, hemicellulases, redox enzymes, peroxidases, mannanases, pectinases, polyesterases, transferases, and cellulases. In some aspects of the present teachings, the enzymes may be selected from phytases, xylanases, beta glucanases, amylases, proteases, lipases, esterases, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment of the present invention, two enzymes are provided in the granule, a xylanase and a beta-glucanase. The enzymes may be mixed together or applied to the granule separately. In another embodiment, three enzymes are provided in the granule, namely beta-glucanase, xylanase and phytase. In some embodiments, the granule can be in a composition with other granules, builders, surfactants, and other materials. The above enzyme lists are examples only and are not meant to be exclusive. Any enzyme may be used in the present invention that is susceptible to problematic glycation, including wild type, recombinant and variant enzymes of bacterial, fungal, yeast, plant, insect and animal sources, and acid, neutral or alkaline enzymes.
As used herein, the term “enzyme matrix” refers to recovered enzyme arising from a fermentation, and may include additional components as processing aids including for example binders (e.g. PVA), anti-foam agents, surfactants (e.g. lutensol), starch, and sugars.
The term “coating layer” and “layer” as used herein are interchangeably. The first coating layer generally encapsulates the core in order to form a substantially continuous layer so that the core surface has few or no uncoated areas. Subsequent coating layers can encapsulate the growing granule to form one or more additional substantially continuous layer(s). Accordingly, as used herein, an “additional layer” refers to one or more coatings applied to a granule, and can contain any of a variety of materials readily available to one of routine skill in the art, including those materials described under “cores”, as well as may be found in the relevant arts, including U.S. Pat. No. 7,018,821, U.S. Pat. No. 8,076,113, U.S. Pat. No. 4,106,991, U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,297, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,740,469.
As used herein, the term “resistant starch” refers to a starch that has been modified to reduce the production of glucose when treated with a glucoamylase. Specifically, a starch as used herein will be deemed “resistant starch” if less than 0.2 mM glucose is produced when 2% w/w of the starch of interest is incubated with Trichoderma reesei wild type glucoamylase for 40 minutes at 25 C in 50 mM NaOAC (pH 4.5), by measuring total reducing ends with the BCA method using a glucose calibration curve.
As used herein, the term “enzyme susceptible to problematic glycation” refers to an enzyme which when subjected to the following assay shows at least a 20% reduction in activity relative to the control. An enzyme solution is obtained, 1% w/w glucose is added to it, the resulting mixture is lyophilized, and the resulting dry solid is exposed to 50 C/70% RH for 5 days, redissolved, and the activity of this sample is measured and compared to a control sample exposed to 50 C/to % RH but without the added glucose. If the enzyme with glucose added loses more than 20% activity than the control, it is “susceptible to problematic glycation.” In some embodiments, at least a 30%, at least a 40%, at least a 50%, at least a 60%, at least a 70%, at least an 80%, or at least a 90% reduction is produced.
As used herein, the term “problematic sugar” generally refers to glucose, fructose, and sucrose.
As used herein, the term “glycatable amino acid residue” refers to an amino acid in a protein that is susceptible of undergoing covalent addition of a sugar. Examples include lysine and arginine, though it will be appreciated that other non-naturally occurring amino acids, if found in a protein and susceptible of undergoing covalent addition of a sugar, would fall within the scope of the present teachings.
As used herein, the term “one diavolume” equals the amount of filtrate recovered in comparison to an equal volume of retentate held at constant volume while adding fresh water or buffer during a process of continuous diafiltration or dialysis.
As used herein, the term “Percent sequence identity” means that a variant has at least a certain percentage of amino acid residues identical to a protein of interest, when aligned using the CLUSTAL W algorithm with default parameters. See Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. Default parameters for the CLUSTAL W algorithm are:
Deletions are counted as non-identical residues, compared to a reference sequence. Deletions occurring at either terminus are included. For example, a variant with six amino acid deletions of the C-terminus of a mature polypeptide 612 residue molecule would have a percent sequence identity of 99% (606/612 identical residues×100, rounded to the nearest whole number) relative to the mature polypeptide. Such a variant would be encompassed by a variant having “at least 99% sequence identity” to a protein of interest.
In an embodiment illustrative of the present teachings, and enzyme susceptible to problematic glycation is identified. Thereafter, the enzyme is made so as to ensure glycation is reduced relative to an enzyme made without such ensurances, so as to improve enzyme stability relative thereto. Various approaches can be undertaken so as to ensure glycation is reduced, as provided in the present examples and discussed in the included claims, and include diafiltration, engineering out problematic amino acid residues, heating to inactivate problematic enzymes remaining from a fermentation, formulating without problematic sugars, formulating using resistant starches, and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method of improving enzyme stability comprising; making an enzyme in a fermentation, wherein the fermentation comprises a fermentation medium comprising problematic sugars and hydrolyzable starch, and wherein the enzyme comprises at least one glycatable amino acid residue and is an enzyme susceptible to problematic glycation; recovering the enzyme; and, removing sufficient amounts of the problematic sugars to improve enzyme stability relative to a similarly fermented enzyme lacking the removing.
In some embodiments, the removing comprises diafiltering an ultrafiltrate concentrate to remove the problematic sugars to form an enzyme concentrate. In some embodiments, the diafiltering comprises at least two, at least three, or at least four, diavolumes, such that the sugars content of the enzyme concentrate is reduced to less than 0.1% w/w. In some embodiments, the removing comprises heating the enzyme after the fermentation at 50C for at least 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 hours to inactivate any starch-hydrolyzing enzymes present. In some embodiments, the removing comprises a previous genetic manipulation, wherein at least one active site lysine residue was removed from the polypeptide. In some embodiments, the active lysine residue is K131 and/or K26, and the enzyme is wild type Buttauxella sp. Phytase, or a molecule 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical thereto. In some embodiments, the active lysine residue is K131 and/or K26, and the enzyme is BP17.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide an enzyme granule comprising less than 0.1%, 0.08%, 0.06%, 0.04%, or 0.01% w/w of problematic sugars. In some embodiments, the enzyme resides in a layer. In some embodiments, the enzyme resides throughout the granule.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide an engineered phytase wherein an amino acid residue at position 131 and/or 26 relative to wild-type buttiauxella phytase is not lysine. In some embodiments, the position 131 residue is arginine.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method of improving an enzyme's stability comprising; determining the existence of at least one glycatable amino acid residue in an enzyme; determining whether the enzyme is susceptible to problematic glycation; making the enzyme so as to ensure glycation is reduced relative to an enzyme made without such ensurances, so as to improve enzyme stability relative thereto. In some embodiments, the ensurances comprise mutating at least one lysine residue. In some embodiments, the ensurances comprise treating the enzyme with heat. In some embodiments, the ensurances comprise formulation the enzyme in a granule comprising resistant starch. In some embodiments, the ensurances comprise diafiltering the enzyme. In some embodiments, the ensurances comprises combining various approaches, for example, mutating and heat treatment, or, mutating and formulating with resistant starch, or, mutating and diafiltering, or, heat treatment and diafiltering, or, mutating and diafiltering, or, mutating and heat treatment and diafiltering, or, in other combinations as will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art exercising routine combinatorial logic.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide an enzyme granule comprising an enzyme susceptible to problematic glycation, and, a resistant starch. In some embodiments, the enzyme granule comprises a) a sodium sulfate seed, b) an enzyme layer comprising the enzyme susceptible to problematic glycation, the resistant starch, sodium phytate, and rapeseed oil, c) a sodium sulfate layer, and, d) an external layer comprising PVA and talc. In some embodiments, the enzyme present in the enzyme granule is a phytase. In some embodiments, the enzyme is wild type Buttiauxella sp. In some embodiments, the enzyme is BP17, or an amino acid sequence 90%, 95%, 97%, or 99% identical to it. In some embodiments, the enzyme is a cellulase. In some embodiments, the enzyme is the cellulase exemplified herein, or an amino acid sequence 90%, 95%, 97%, or 99% identical to it.
The enzymes and compositions of the present teachings will found application of any of a variety of fields, including grain and starch processing (e.g.-amylases and glucoamylases), fabric and household care (e.g.-proteases), biomass processing (e.g.-cellulases), animal feed (e.g.-phytases). These and other application areas and proteins will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, and aren't generally a limitation of the present teachings.
The enzymes of the present teachings can be formulated as solids (eg-enzyme granules), or as liquids (e.g.-liquids containing suitable amounts of for examples sorbitol and salt), or indeed in any form that one of skill in the art would recognize their applicability.
The invention can be further understood by reference to the following examples, which is provided by way of illustration and not meant to be limiting.
To explore the effect of time on phytase stability, a BP17 phytase was expressed and purified to form a UFC.
BP17 is an enzyme variant of a Buttiauxella sp. phytase. The sequence for BP17 (excluding signal peptide) is as follows, and is described in PCT/US2013/0244415.
The fermentation of proteins including BP17 phytase is described in WO2004035070A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,713,725B2. After fermentation, the fermentate is passed through a rotary drum vacuum filtration unit which can be precoated with diatomaceous earth to remove the cells from the fermentate. Next, the cell free fermentate is concentrated by passing it through a 10,000 molecular weight cutoff ultrafiltration membrane removing enough permeate until the final activity is between 30,000 and 80,000 FTU/g.
The recovered fermentation concentrate is called “ultrafiltered concentrate” or UFC and contains the phytase protein along with other proteins, peptides, polysaccharides and sugars produced during the fermentation as byproducts. The UFC is combined with 0.3% Potassium Sorbate and 0.3% Sodium Benzoate to serve as a preservative prior to granulating the material. To make a 2000 gram batch of Axtra Phytase TPT®, 380 g of Phytase UFC having an activity of 74,250 units/g and a solids content of 25.6% is combined with 190 g of water, 70.6 g of sucrose, 152.9 g of corn starch, 17.6 g of rapeseed oil and 11.8 g of sodium phytate and this mixture is sprayed onto 722 g of sodium sulfate seeds which have been charged to a Vector VFC-1 fluid bed granulator. For this first spray coating, the inlet temperature was 60° C., the outlet temperature was 40° C., the spray rate was 11 g/min, the atomization air pressure was 38 psi and the fluidization air velocity was 75 cfm. Next a solution of 870 g of sodium sulfate dissolved in 2475 g of water is sprayed onto the granule using an inlet temperature was 68° C., the outlet temperature was 47° C., the spray rate was 25 g/min, the atomization air pressure was 38 psi and the fluidization air velocity was 75 cfm. The final coating was prepared by dissolving 70.59 g of polyvinyl alcohol (Mowial 5-88®) in 965 g of water with 141 g of talc at 90° C. for 30 minutes. After this solution is allowed to cool back to room temperature, it is sprayed onto the granule using an inlet temperature of 70° C., an outlet temperature of 51° C., a spray rate of 11 g/min, an atomization air pressure of 40 psi and a fluidization air velocity of 75 cfm. Then, 20 gram samples of Axtra Phytase TPT® enzyme granules were placed in a 200 ml closed polyethylene container stored at 4° C., 25° C. and 40° C. for 12 months. At regular time intervals, phytase activity was determined by both the para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) assay and the molybdenum vanadat (Mo-V) assay following dissolution with0.25 M Sodium Acetate Buffer, pH 5.5. In the pNPP assay, a synthetic substrate, para-nitrophenyl phosphate, is employed. Upon dephosphorylation with phytase and basification of the reaction mixture, the para-nitrophenylate anion is formed, which absorbs at 405 nm. In the Mo-V assay, sodium phytate is used as a substrate. Phytate desphosphorylation is coupled to absorbance at 415 nm upon treatment with an acidic molybdenum-vanadate cocktail. The pNPP assay is a generic phosphatase assay, while the Mo-V assay is specific to phytase
The pNPP Assay can be performed on an automated Konelab® robot as follows. All samples were diluted in 0.25 M acetate pH 5.5 buffer (Dissolve 30.02 g sodium acetate trihydrate (or 18.10 g sodium acetate anhydrous), 1.76 g concentrated acetic acid (=1.677 ml) and 0.147 g calcium chloride dihydrate in 900 ml Milli-Q water. Adjust to pH 5.5 with 4 M acetic acid (22.9 ml concentrated acetic acid in 100 ml Milli-Q water) or 100% acetic acid. Add 1 ml TWEEN 20 and adjust volume to 1000 ml with Milli-Q water.). Once diluted samples were loaded into the Konelab, 7 μl of sample was combined with 84 μl of pNPP substrate solution (4-nitrophenyl phosphate (Npp) di(-tris) salt (FW 461.4) (Sigma N-3254) Weigh 0.09228 g 4-Nitrophenyl phosphate and dissolve in 10 mL Assay Buffer) and allowed to incubate at 30° C. for 5 minutes. Next, 105 μl of 200 mM borate stop solution (Dissolve 6.183 g boric acid in 400 mL MilliQ water. Adjust pH to 10.2 with 1N NaOH. Q.S. to 500 mL with MilliQ water.) is added to the sample and substrate to quench the reaction for 2 minutes. The absorbance at 405 nm is read and converted to activity units of FTU/g through the use of a calibration curve containing phytase standards at 0, 2.5, 13.0 and 27.0 FTU/g.
The graphs in
It was hypothesized that the differential loss of activity between the pNPP and Mo-V assay is due to glycation of lysine residues near the phytase active site which could alter substrate specificity towards the larger, natural phytic acid substrate but not for the smaller synthetic para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) substrate.
To test the role of glycation, the Maillard browning reaction was monitored visually by depositing a solution BP17 ETD phytase UFC onto a circle of filter paper, drying the enzyme and then placing the enzyme in an environmental chamber at 50° C. and 70% relative humidity for 5 to 12 days.
Diafiltration of BP17 ETD UFC was performed using a 10K molecular weight cutoff membrane to filter away the permeate of the UFC (which contains all of the material less than 10K Daltons). Diafiltration was performed on a Amicon stirred cell (Amicon Model #8400) fitted with a 10K Dalton molecular weight cutoff Polyethersulfone membrane (Sartorius No. 14639—76-----D) on top of a 10K Dalton molecular weight cutoff regenerated cellulose membrane (Millipore Cat. #PLGC07610). By performing dialfiltration to generate 3 times the original volume of the starting UFC in permeate (3 diavolumes), approximately 96% of all reducing sugars including glucose are removed from the UFC, greatly reducing the tendency for this UFC to undergo glycation or the Maillard reaction. The percent of permeable molecules removed during diafiltration can be described by the following equation:
{1−[e(V*T)]−1}×100
where V is the number of diavolumes diafiltered and T is the transmission coefficient through the membrane. When we assume T=1 (100% transmission) and V=3 (3 diavolumes), them the percent permeable molecules diafiltered is (1−e−3)×100 or 95%.
As proteins undergo the Maillard reaction they will form glycation products, which undergo further chemical reaction to form fluorescent heterocyclic products. The formation of these advanced glycation products can be monitored by measuring the intensity of their fluorescent emission signal. Approximately 0.15 g granule was weighed and mixed with 1.5 ml dilution buffer (100 mM NaOAc, pH 5.5), and allowed to dissolve for 20 min at room temperature. The granules were composed approximately 37% of a 200-300 μm core (a seed of sodium sulfate) coated with an enzyme layer composed of either (A) 2% polyvinyl alcohol (Mowial® 5-88), 0.50% sodium phytate and approximately 4% phytase enzyme solids or, (B) 3% sucrose, 6.5% corn starch, 0.50% sodium phytate and approximately 4% phytase enzyme solids. On top of the enzyme layer is a 40% layer of sodium sulfate followed by a final coating layer composed of 3% polyvinyl alcohol and 6% Talc. The sample was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and filtered through 0.45 um filters. Zeba desalt spin columns (10 ml columns) were equilibrated 4×5 ml 20 mM sodium borate buffer at pH 8.5. One milliliter of the sample was added to each column with 0.2 ml of borate buffer to aid elution by centrifugation. The eluted sample was then placed into a microtiter plate and the fluorescence spectrum was monitored using a 335 nm excitation wavelength.
Similarly treated samples used in the Intrinsic Fluorescence measurements were used in the Fluorescamine Assay. Fluorescamine was used to directly measure the level of glycated lysine groups in phytase. Fluorescamine reacts with unmodified (non-glycated) lysine groups and becomes fluorescent after reaction.
Fluorescamine (8 mg) was mixed with DMSO (50 ml) to make a solution at a final concentration 0.16 mg/ml. Nine 2-fold serial dilutions of the desalted samples were prepared on a 96 well microtiter plate. Sample quantities of 75 ul were transferred to black fluorescent plates in duplicate. One set was combined with 18 ul of the DMSO/fluorescamine solution and the other was combined with 18 ul of DMSO alone. The solutions are allowed to react at room temperature for 5 minutes on shaker plate with a cover. The samples were excited at 390 nm and emission was monitored at 475 nm. Fluorescent emission values without fluorescamine were subtracted from those with fluorescamine and plotted.
Mass spectrometry evidence for glycation of phytase is shown in
In
2 mg/ml of BP17 ETD phytase was purified via high ion exchange chromatography and combined with 0 to 0.0625 M of glucose or fructose in solution. These solutions were lyophilized to produce a dry solid and this lyophilized material was incubated at 50° C. and 70% relative humidity for 6 days to induce glycation or the Maillard reaction of the phytase with the added reducing sugar.
Heat treatment of the BP17 ETD phytase UFC is done to remove background sucrase and glucoamylase activity which can generate glucose during storage from sucrose and starch in the formulation, respectively.
It can be seen that both diafiltration and heat treatment improve the storage stability of the dry phytase towards its natural substrate phytate (MG Assay) while only heat treatment improves the storage stability of the dry phytase towards its synthetic pNPP substrate. This is most likely because diafiltration is primarily removing glucose and other reducing sugars and therefore preventing glycation of the phytase. In contrast, heat treatment is primarily deactivating the background enzymes protease, glucoamylase and sucrase and since no sucrose or starch is present in these UFC's, the heat treatment is primarily preventing proteolysis which affects activity towards both the synthetic and real substrate.
The cellulase is an endo-beta-D-1,4-glucanase from Staphylotrichum coccosporum gi|197267671 (short name STCE1). It can be seen that the original UFC containing about 0.01 mg/ml glucose shows about a 30% loss of activity over 431 hours while the lyophilized UFC shows no loss of activity over the same time period. Adding glucose back to the lyphilized UFC causes the celllulase to become unstable again causing as much as 80% loss of activity over 450 hours at glucose concentrations of 1 mg/ml and higher. Interestingly, adding 0.01 mg/ml glucose back to the diafiltered UFC does not cause as much activity loss as the original UFC which contains 0.01 mg/ml glucose. This can be explained by the hypothesis that glucose may not be the only reducing sugar present in the original UFC.
Without being bound by theory, it is hypothesized that at least one of the lysines near the active site include K25, K34, K42 and K65 may be responsible for this loss.
To explore the role of specific lysine amino acids contributing to glycation, and protein stability, protein engineering efforts were undertaken. This study was performed using WT and variants K131R and K26R. These lysine residues were chosen based on (1) conservation at these positions among other phytase sequences (
Sequences for the proteins considered in
The following materials were used: Buttauxilla sp. phytase variants were produced in Trichoderma reseei host and purified using ion exchange chromatography; BP17/BP111 Konelab Standard (22000 FTU/g; density=1.07); 402.4 mM glucose in water; Zeba 7 kDa Cutoff Desalting Plate; para-nitrophenylphosphate; and, Phytate/Malachite Green Reagents.
To induce the Maillard reaction, glucose stock solutions were prepared at several concentrations: 0, 8, 20 and 40 mM. Reactions were initiated by mixing 50 uL of phytase variant (2 mg/mL) with 50 uL of glucose solution in PCR strips. A PCR strip was prepared for each of four time points. Samples were frozen, lyophilized and placed in an incubator at 40 C and 70% Relative Humidity (RH). Samples were removed at 0, 58, 100 and 237 hours and stored at −20° C. until completion of the study. Afterwards, samples were resuspended with 100 uL of water and processed using a Zeba 7 kDa cutoff desalting plate to remove excess glucose.
Enzyme activities were determined using pNPP and IP6 substrates with BP17 enzyme standards. The pNPP assay relies on formation of the p-nitrophenylate ion, which absorbs at 405 nm. The IP6 assay is dependent on malachite green (MG) staining of the molybdate-phosphate complex, which absorbs at 620 nm.
These data indicated that samples not treated with glucose retained full activity for both IP6 (
Further, retention of activity toward pNPP and loss of activity toward IP6 is an indication of the extent of lysine glycation due to the Maillard reaction. While the activity on pNPP is retained during glucose stress, activity on IP6 is diminished at initial time points (even at time zero) with an exception of K131 R, and to a lesser extent K26R (
Also, at time 100 h, a glucose-dependent increase of intrinsic fluorescence is noted for WT, but not for K131R and K26R (
These results suggest that K131 and K26 are critical lysines that upon glucose stress alter IP6 substrate specificity. The fact that K131R and K26R variants are resistant to glucose stress while the wild type loses activity toward IP6 suggests that these residues undergo the Maillard reaction.
Additional sequences of interest that will be appreciated to benefit from the present teachings are shown in
Phytase granules (2 g), prepared according to the process described for Example 1 above, were weighed in individual specimen cups. Seven cups per sample were prepared, each cup representing a time point. Open cups were placed in incubators set to either 40° C. and 70% Relative Humidity (RH), or 50° C. and 70% RH. Cups containing samples were collected from the incubator at 0, 125, 305 and 335 h. Samples were allowed to equilibrate to ambient temperature and humidity for 20 minutes, covered with a lid and stored at −20° C. until all samples were collected.
Granules (0.1 g) were extracted with ˜9.9 g assay buffer in 15 mL conical tubes. Samples were allowed to dissolve for 20 min at room temperature with 58 RPM rotation. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 3 min, supernatant containing phytase was manually filtered. Phytase activity, for all extracted samples, was assumed to be ˜120 FTU/mL and were diluted with MG assay buffer to 15 FTU/mL for pNPP assay and to 0.010 FTU/mL for IP6/Malachite Green assay.
Granules were grounded with mortar until a fine powder was obtained. Grinding process was performed in the hood to avoid enzyme exposure. Ground samples (2 g) were weighed in 15 mL conical tubes and 3 mL 2% TFA was added to the dry powder. Sample was mixed and allowed to dissolve for 15 min at room temperature by constant rotation at ˜25 RPM. Sample (500 uL) was neutralized with 500 uL Tris (pH 7.6), mixed, centrifuged for 2 min at 15000 RPM and supernatant was analyzed for glucose using the Konelab glucose oxidase assay.
The results are depicted in
Reducing sugars in solid formulations can be part of the formulation ingredient (e.g., dextrose) or produced inadvertently overtime from other components such as starch and sucrose due to background glucoamylase and invertase. While glucoamylase produces glucose from starch substrate, invertase produces glucose and fructose from the non-reducing sugar sucrose. Glucoamylase and invertase are produced ubiquitously along with the enzyme of interest in the production strain Trichoderma reesei. Thus, using starch and sucrose in solid formulations should be acceptable only if the enzyme of interest can sustain high levels of reducing sugars without losing enzyme activity.
To test the effect of a starch resistant to hydrolysis, glucose production was measured when Nylon VII was employed. Nylon VII is a resistant starch from a corn hybrid that contains 70% amylose and 30% amylopectin. It is predicted that glucose that would normally arise by the background glucoamylase present in diafiltered BP17 ETD UFC, would be reduced by the use of Nylon VII. Measurements were done at 15° C. Total glucose liberated from Nylon VII was compared to that liberated from wheat starch, a more conventional formulation ingredient that would be predicted to undergo hydrolysis by the glucoamylase.
1. Axtra PHY/BP17 ETD UFC from Beloit (C14068; Batch 1681970737) (pH 4.9)
2. 250 mM Sodium Acetate (pH 4.9)
3. Nylon VII Starch
4. Wheat Starch from Hanko
5. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)
6. 500 mM Tris, pH 7.6
7. Glucose Oxidase Assay (Konelab)
Axtra PHY/BP17 ETD was diafiltered with three diavolumes. UFC and buffer were pre-chilled on ice prior to initiating reaction. Samples were transferred to a refrigerated incubator set to 15° C. and mixed by an automatic rotator. Wheat starch and Nylon VII (3.7 g) were suspended independently in cold 16.3 g diafiltered UFC or 250 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.9). Starch concentration used is equivalent to that present in TPT formulation. Time points were taken for about 4 h and glucose production was halted by acid quench using TFA. The following time points were collected taking into account the quenching time:
Hylon VII UFC: 3.5, 32.7, 73.87, 126, 231.35 min
Hylon VII Buffer: 3.45, 35.18, 76.65, 133.35, 231.18 min
Wheat Starch UFC: 3.28, 33.9, 74.6, 129.51, 230.26 min
Wheat Starch Buffer: 2.93, 36.27, 70.4, 126.82, 224.67 min
The quench procedure was performed at room temperature as follows. Reaction mixture (1 mL) was spun at 15000 RPM for 2 min. Supernatant (0.49 mL) was collected and added to eppendorf tube containing 10 ul TFA. Solution was vortex to ensure proper mixing and centrifuged for 2 min at 15000 RPM to remove precipitate. Supernatant (400 ul) was added to 500 ul of 500 mM Tris, pH 7.6 in a new tube as a way to neutralize the solution prior glucose measurement. Samples were frozen at −80 C soon after the acid quench step and until glucose analysis.
To measure glucose, samples were thawed for 20-30 min at room temp and glucose concentration was determined following the Konelab glucose oxidase assay procedure. Although all UFC samples were in range of the assay, samples in buffer were below the limit of detection.
We observed that background glucoamylase present in BP17 ETD UFC produces 12 mM glucose from Nylon VII starch after 231 min at 15° C. and pH 4.9. This concentration of glucose produced from Nylon VII is ˜7.7-fold lower than that produced from wheat starch after 237 min.
The results are shown in
This application claims benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. U.S. Ser. No. 61/904,378, filed 14 Nov. 2013 and U.S. Ser. No. 61/918,396, filed 19 Dec. 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2014/065612 | 11/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61904378 | Nov 2013 | US | |
| 61918396 | Dec 2013 | US |
