Patent Grant
8846559
The invention relates generally to the alkylation of aromatic compounds and catalysts used for such reactions.
Aromatic compounds may be alkylated to form different alkylated aromatic products. One that has particular value is para-xylene. Para-xylene is a valuable substituted aromatic compound because of its great demand for its oxidation to terephthalic acid, a major component in forming polyester fibers and resins. It can be commercially produced from hydrotreating of naphtha (catalytic reforming), steam cracking of naphtha or gas oil, and toluene disproportionation.
Alkylation of toluene with methanol, which is also known as toluene methylation, has been used in laboratory studies to produce para-xylene. Toluene methylation has been known to occur over acidic catalyst, particularly over zeolite catalyst. In particular, ZSM-5 zeolite, zeolite Beta and silicoaluminophosphate (SAPO) catalysts have been used for this process. Generally, a thermodynamic equilibrium mixture of ortho (o)-, meta (m)- and para (p)-xylenes can be formed from the methylation of toluene, as is illustrated by the reaction below.
Thermodynamic equilibrium compositions of o-, m-, and p-xylenes may be around 25, 50 and 25 mole %, respectively, at a reaction temperature of about 500° C. Such toluene methylation may occur over a wide range of temperatures, however. Para-xylene can be separated from mixed xylenes by a cycle of adsorption and isomerization. Byproducts such as C9+ and other aromatic products can be produced by secondary alkylation of the xylene product.
A significantly higher amount of p-xylene can be obtained in toluene methylation reaction if the catalyst has shape selective properties. Shape selective properties can be obtained in modified zeolite catalysts by narrowing zeolite pore opening size, inactivation of the external surface of the zeolite or controlling zeolite acidity. Toluene methylation may occur over modified ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts giving xylene products containing significantly greater amounts of p-xylene than the thermodynamic concentration.
Unfortunately, there are a number of technical hurdles for toluene methylation to be commercially successful. These include fast catalyst deactivation, low methanol selectivity, and so on. Most of the catalysts, if not all, for toluene methylation show fast catalyst deactivation. Typically, toluene conversion declines with time on stream due to rapid coke formation on the catalyst. The catalyst deactivation is one of the most difficult technical hurdles to overcome for commercial use of toluene methylation.
The present invention is directed to a catalyst and a method of preparation of a catalyst that has shape selective properties and that also has increased catalyst stability when used in aromatic alkylation reactions, such a toluene methylation.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, in which:
Zeolites are aluminosilicate materials having microporous structures. They may be naturally occurring or synthesized. Zeolites are commonly used as catalysts in a variety of different hydrocarbon conversion reactions such as isomerization and alkylation reactions. Among these is the alkylation of aromatic compounds.
The ZSM-5 zeolite is one of the most versatile zeolites used for catalyst in aromatic alkylation. Specific reference is made to the use of a ZSM-5 zeolite that has been modified in accordance with the invention for use in toluene methylation, for which the modified zeolite is particularly well suited. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art, however, that the zeolite catalysts described herein may have application for use in other types of reactions, such as transalkylation and other aromatic alkylation reactions. In particular, the catalyst of the invention may have application to reactions to provide increased selectivity for para-isomers in mixed dialkylated aromatic products.
The ZSM-5 zeolite is a porous material containing intersecting two-dimensional pore structure with 10-membered oxygen rings. Zeolite materials with such 10-membered oxygen ring pore structures are often classified as medium-pore zeolites. Such medium-pore zeolites typically have pore diameters ranging from 5.0 Å to 7.0 Å. The ZSM-5 zeolite is a medium pore-size zeolite with a pore diameter of from about 5.1 to about 5.6 Å.
Although specific reference and emphasis is made with respect to ZSM-5 zeolite, other zeolites may be treated and formed using the techniques described herein as well. One skilled in the art will therefore readily appreciate that other zeolite materials besides ZSM-5 zeolite may provide similar properties to those of the ZSM-5 zeolite materials described, such as mordenite, omega, etc. These may be medium pore zeolites as well.
The ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts and their preparation are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,886, which is herein incorporated by reference. The starting ZSM-5 may be an NH4+ or H+ form and may contain traces of other cations. In the present invention, the ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of from about 30 or lower to about 1000 or higher prior to modification, more particularly, the silica/alumina molar ratio may be from about 30, 50, 80, 100, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500 to about 1000 or more, including any and all data points within such range and the end points of the such range.
It should be understood that with respect to any concentration or amount range listed or described herein as being useful, suitable, or the like, it is intended to include every concentration or amount within the range, including the end points, and is to be considered as having been specifically stated. For example, “a range of from 1 to 10” is to be read as indicating each and every possible number along the continuum between about 1 and about 10. Thus, even if specific data points within the range, or even no data points within the range, are explicitly identified or refer to only a specific few, it is to be understood that the inventors appreciate and understand that any and all data points within the range are to be considered to have been specified, and that the inventors are in possession of the entire range and all points within the range.
To provide para-selective properties to the ZSM-5 zeolite or other zeolites, the zeolite is modified by treating it with phosphorus-containing compounds. Such phosphorus-containing compounds may include, but are not limited to, phosphonic, phosphinous, phosphorus and phosphoric acids, salts and esters of such acids and phosphorous halides. In particular, phosphoric acid (H3PO4) and ammonium hydrogen phosphate ((NH4)2HPO4) may be used as the phosphorus-containing compound to provide a catalyst for aromatic alkylation or toluene methylation with shape selective properties to provide increased para-selectivity. Such modified catalysts may contain phosphorus (P) in an amount of from about 0.01 wt % to about 15 wt % by total weight of the catalyst.
The phosphorus treatment may be carried out by various techniques. This may include slurry evaporation, wet incipient and spray-dry methods. In slurry evaporation, the phosphorus may be incorporated into the catalyst by preparing a slurry of the zeolite and an aqueous solution of the phosphorus compound. Heating of the slurry may be used to facilitate treatment of the zeolite catalyst and to evaporate liquids. Heating of the slurry to temperatures of from about 25° C. or more, with from about 70° C. to about 100° C. may be suitable in most instances. The slurry may also be stirred or agitated during this step to ensure uniform treatment. The evaporation of the liquid from the zeolite slurry can be alternatively achieved by using a spray-dry technique which is well known in the art.
In the wet incipient method, an aqueous solution of the phosphorus compound is added, such as by spraying, to dry zeolite without forming a slurry. The dry zeolite, which may be initially in the form of a powder, may be mixed with the phosphorus compound or its aqueous solution. If necessary, water may be added to the mixture of zeolite powder and phosphorus containing compound or its solution to facilitate interaction between them. The phosphorus treated zeolite is then calcined using a temperature profile with a maximum temperature of from about 400° C. to about 700° C. In some embodiments, the P-treated zeolite may be heated at a temperature of about 300° C. or higher prior to binding and then the zeolite is bound with a suitable binder, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,410, which is herein incorporated by reference.
The phosphorus treated zeolite after calcination is combined with a binder material to form catalyst with a particular shape, for example, 1/16-inch diameter cylindrical shaped extruded catalyst. The binder materials may include inorganic oxide materials. In particular, a binder of an aluminum-containing material, such as alumina, clay, aluminum phosphate, silica-alumina or other-aluminum containing material, or their combinations, may be particularly useful. The bound catalyst may contain from about 1 wt % to about 99 wt % of binder material by total weight of the catalyst. In some applications the binder may be present in an amount of from about 10 wt % to about 50 wt % binder by total weight of catalyst.
Even without a binder the phosphorus treated zeolite (prior to calcination as described above) can also be formed into a particular shape and size as catalyst, for example, 1/16-inch diameter cylindrical shaped extrudates. Such catalyst may be described as “self-bound” catalyst.
The formed catalyst (either self-bound or bound with binder such as alumina) may then be calcined or heated at a temperature of about 400° C. or higher, more particularly at a temperature from about 450° C. to about 700° C. Such heating may be carried out for 0.5 hours or more.
In order to provide increased catalyst activity or stability, the bound phosphorus-treated zeolite includes a hydrogenating metal. The hydrogenating metal may be any of the group VIIIA transition metals and may include nickel, palladium and platinum, as well as other metals. Nickel is particularly well suited as the hydrogenating metal. The hydrogenating metal may be present in an amount of from about 0.01 weight % to about 5.0 weight %, more particularly, from about 0.03 weight % to about 2.0 weight % of the total weight of zeolite catalyst. The hydrogenating metal may be added to the catalyst as hydrogenating metal salt or other compound that readily dissolves in water.
Unexpectedly, the presence of a hydrogenating metal in a bound phosphorus-treated ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts has an impact on the activity of the final catalyst. A hydrogenating metal deposited on the bound phosphorus-treated zeolite provides increased activity. Deposition of the hydrogenating metal may be carried out by immersing the bound phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst in an aqueous solution containing the hydrogenating metal. The temperature of the solution may be maintained at room temperature or a temperature below the boiling point of the solution. After a period of 5 min or more, the liquid is separated from the solid. This is done through decantation or filtration or other non-evaporative separation techniques for separating liquids from solids. As used herein, the term or expression “separation,” “separating” or similar expressions as it is applied to the separation of the liquids and solids upon the treatment of the zeolite with an aqueous solution of a hydrogenating metal is meant to exclude evaporation of liquids from the solids. As is demonstrated in the examples, treatment of self-bound P/ZSM-5 catalyst with the hydrogenating metal solution did not result in a catalyst exhibiting the increased catalytic activity.
The method of treatment of the bound P/ZSM-5 catalyst with hydrogenating metal has an added impact on catalyst activity or stability as well. As demonstrated in the examples, the separation of liquid by filtration or decantation technique after treating the bound zeolite catalyst with solution containing hydrogenating metal resulted in a catalyst with further increased activity or stability than the commonly used impregnation technique where the liquid is evaporated to dryness. See, for example, Table 7: Catalyst G v. Catalyst E.
After treatment with the hydrogenating metal, the treated catalyst may be calcined at a temperature from about 400° C. to about 600° C. in an environment containing oxygen, typically air. The hydrogenating metal in the catalyst after such calcinations may be present in the oxide form, for example, Ni as NiO.
The hydrogenating metal loaded zeolite catalyst may be further pretreated prior to use in alkylation or other reactions to reduce or to lower the oxidation state of the hydrogenating metal in a reducing environment. Such treatment includes contacting the catalyst with a reducing gas at an elevated temperature. The reducing gas may be hydrogen (H2) or a hydrogen-containing gas, such as a mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen (N2) or light alkane(s). The catalyst is contacted with the reducing gas, which may be mixed with an inert carrier gas, such as nitrogen at an initial starting temperature. The temperature may be slowly ramped up during the pretreatment, with the initial starting temperature being from about 100 to about 200° C., and which may be increased at a rate of from about 0.2 to about 10.0° C./min to the final pretreatment temperature. The final pretreatment temperature may be from about 350 to about 600° C., more particularly from about 400 to about 550° C. The pretreatment may be carried out from about 0.5 to 10 hours or more, more particularly from 1 to 9 hours, and still more particularly from about 2 to 7 hours.
Based on temperature programmed reduction profile data on NiO or the Ni2+ containing zeolite catalyst, it is believed that the above described catalyst pretreatment may cause reduction of Ni2+ to Ni+ and Ni0. The hydrogenating metal ions to an oxidation state of less than 1 may be useful in retarding the coke formation during the alkylation reactions, and thus facilitate increasing the catalyst stability.
After reducing, the hydrogenating metal containing zeolite catalyst may also be steamed prior to use for the catalytic reactions. The catalyst may be steamed at a temperature of 300° C. or lower before using the catalyst in any reaction. The steaming can be carried out in-situ or ex-situ of the reactor. In some embodiments, the catalyst is steamed at mild temperatures. Methods for steaming at mild temperatures that are useful in the present invention are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,304,194, which is herein incorporated by reference.
After reducing and any steaming, the catalyst may be contacted with an appropriate feed under alkylation reaction conditions to carry out the aromatic alkylation. Examples of alkylation reactions for which the invention has application include toluene alkylation with an alkylating agent such as methanol. Other examples may include gas phase toluene disproportionation in the presence of hydrogen producing benzene and mixed-xylenes. While the invention has application to many aromatic alkylation reactions, it is particularly well suited for toluene methylation to produce para-xylene using ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst. Although much of the description herein may be directed to such toluene methylation, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that it is not solely limited to such use.
The hydrogenating metal containing zeolite catalyst may be contacted with an appropriate feed of an aromatic hydrocarbon and an alkylating agent under alkylation reaction conditions to carry out aromatic alkylation. In aromatic alkylation an “alkylation feed” feed may be used. A gas cofeed may also be used. The cofeed gas may include hydrogen or an inert gas. As used herein, the expression “alklyation feed” is meant to encompass the aromatic compound and the alkylating agent. As used herein with respect to toluene methylation, the expression “methylation feed” is meant to encompass the feed of toluene and methanol.
In addition to any cofeed gas, water that may be in the form of steam, may also be introduced into the reactor as cofeed along with the alkylation feed. The water or steam used for the alkylation or methylation reaction may be introduced, with or without hydrogen or inert gas as cofeed, with the alkylation feed to the reactor during the start up of the alkylation reaction, or it may be introduced subsequent to initial start up. In either case, liquid water may be added and vaporized prior to its mixing with cofeed gas (if any) and the alkylation feed. The use of water cofeed in aromatic alkylation is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,060,864, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The reactor pressure for toluene methylation or other aromatic alkylation may vary, but typically ranges from about 10 to about 1000 psig. Reactor temperatures may vary, but typically range from about 400 to about 700° C. Upon introduction of feed into the reactor, the catalyst bed temperature may be adjusted to a selected reaction temperature to effect a desired conversion. The temperature may be increased gradually at a rate of from about 0.1° C./min to about 10° C./min to provide the desired final reactor temperature. As used in the examples, reactor temperature refers to the temperature as measured at the inlet of catalyst bed of the reactor.
The reaction may be carried out in a variety of different reactors that are commonly used for carrying out aromatic alkylation reactions. Single or multiple reactors in series and/or parallel may be suitable for carrying out the aromatic alkylation or toluene methylation reactions.
As used herein, catalytic activity can be expressed as the % moles of the hydrocarbon or reactant converted with respect to the moles of hydrocarbon or reactant fed. In toluene methylation where toluene is converted to xylenes, the catalytic activity may be measured by the toluene converted with respect to the moles of toluene fed and can be defined by the following formulas:
Mole % Toluene Conversion=[(Ti−To)/Ti]×100 (2)
where, Ti is the number of moles of toluene fed and To is the number of moles toluene unreacted. As used herein, selectivity for mixed xylenes may be expressed as:
Mole % Mixed Xylene Selectivity=[Xtx/(Ti−To)]×100 (3)
where, Xtx is the number of moles of total or mixed (o-, m- or p-) xylenes in the product. As used herein, selectivity for p-xylene may be expressed as:
Mole % p-Xylene Selectivity=(Xp/Xtx)×100 (4)
where, Xp is the number of moles of p-xylene.
As used herein, methanol conversion may be expressed as:
Mole % Methanol Conversion=[(Mi−Mo)/Mi]×100 (5)
where, Mi is the number of moles of methanol fed and Mo is the number of moles methanol unreacted.
As used herein, methanol selectivity for toluene methylation may be expressed as:
Mole % Methanol Selectivity=[Xtx/(Mi−Mo)]×100 (6)
where, Xtx is the number of moles of mixed (o-, m- or p-) xylenes, Mi is the number of moles of methanol fed and Mo is the number of moles of unreacted methanol.
The following examples better serve to illustrate the invention.
Comparative Catalyst A
A NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite powder having a SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio of between 250 and 300 was treated with H3PO4 and then was calcined at a temperature of about 530° C. The phosphorus treated ZSM-5 zeolite was crushed into fine powder and was then combined with about 20% by weight of alumina binder and extruded into 1/16-inch diameter cylindrical shaped catalyst extrudates. The bound zeolite was then calcined or heated to a temperature of 530° C. The powdered phosphorus treated ZSM-5 (P/ZSM-5) and the alumina bound P/ZSM-5 catalyst (Catalyst A) were analyzed for Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and Al2O3 by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and for BET surface area and total pore volume by N2 adsorption. The results are shown in Table 1 below.
Catalyst A, described above, was tested for toluene methylation reaction in a fixed bed, continuous flow type reactor. A catalyst charge of 5.4 ml (catalyst size: 20-40 mesh) was loaded in the reactor. The catalyst was dried by slowly raising the catalyst bed temperature (about 5° C./min) to 150° C. under hydrogen flow (200 cc/min) for about one hour. The catalyst was further heated at 480° C. for 3 hours under H2 flow (same flow rate). The catalyst was steamed by introducing water vapor (2.2 mmole/min) with a carrier gas of H2 (459 cc/min) at 200° C. overnight. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) [based on methylation feed (toluene+methanol)] was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed of H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor inlet pressure was about 20 psig. The catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to 450° C. and then adjusted to 485° C., at which toluene conversion was about 11.4 mole %. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity.
Catalyst B
Nickel was incorporated with the alumina bound P/ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst (Catalyst A) from Example 1 to form Catalyst B. Weighted 0.737 g of nickel hexahydrate was dissolved in 100 ml deionized water in a flask and 30.03 g extrudates of Catalyst A was immersed in the nickel salt solution in the flask which was then shaken for 5 minutes and was aged at 60° C. overnight. Catalyst A was then separated by decanting the liquid. The nickel-treated zeolite was then calcined at a maximum temperature of about 530° C. for 10 hours. The nickel content of the catalyst was 0.07 wt % by total weight as measured by XRF analysis. Catalyst preparation and analysis for Catalyst B are summarized in Table 3.
Catalyst B, described above, was tested for toluene methylation reaction in a fixed bed, continuous flow type reactor. A catalyst charge of 5.4 ml (catalyst size: 20-40 mesh) was loaded in the reactor. The catalyst was dried by slowly raising the catalyst bed temperature (about 5° C./min) to 150° C. under hydrogen flow (200 cc/min) for at least one hour. The catalyst was further heated (reduced) at 430° C. for 3 hours under H2 flow (same flow rate). The catalyst was steamed by introducing water vapor (2.2 mmole/min) with a carrier gas of H2 (459 cc/min) at 200° C. overnight. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) [based on methylation feed (toluene+methanol)] was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed of H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig and the catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to 450° C. and then adjusted to 495° C. at which toluene conversion was about 15.4 mole %. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity.
As in Example 2, Catalyst B was employed in toluene methylation. The reactor, catalyst loading, drying and steaming conditions were the same as in Example 2, except the catalyst was heated at a pre-reduction temperature of about 480° C. instead of 430° C. under H2 flow prior to steaming.
Catalysts C-F
In addition to Catalyst B, several nickel-loaded catalysts with different nickel contents were tested in toluene methylation reactions to examine the effects of Ni content on catalyst activity, selectivity and stability. Ni loaded catalysts C, D, E and F were made using base Catalyst A and the same procedure as described for Catalyst B above. Table 3 shows the amounts of base catalyst, nickel salt, amount of water used, aging temperature and nickel content (measured by XRF) on the final catalysts. The Ni contents in the catalysts varied from 0.03 wt % to about 0.15 wt %.
Catalysts C, D, E and F were tested in toluene methylation reactions. Catalyst loading, predrying, steaming and testing conditions were the same as described for Example 3.
Catalysts B, C, D, E and F showed an increased catalyst activity showing higher toluene conversion compared to Catalyst A (Table 2, Examples 1-7).
Catalyst G
In this example, an impregnation technique was used to form a Ni loaded catalyst (Catalyst G). In this technique, nickel was incorporated with the alumina bound P/ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst from Example 1 (Catalyst A). Nickel hexahydrate in an amount of 0.153 g was dissolved in 100 ml deionized water. The nickel salt solution was added to 30.4 g of the extruded Catalyst A in a ceramic bowl and aged at 90° C. overnight. Most of the liquid was evaporated and further evaporation continued during calcination at 530° C.
Catalyst G was then used in toluene methylation, as in the previous examples. A catalyst charge of 5.4 ml (catalyst size: 20-40 mesh) was loaded in the reactor. The catalyst was dried by slowly raising the catalyst bed temperature (about 5° C./min) to 150° C. under hydrogen flow (200 cc/min) for at least one hour. The catalyst was further heated (reduced) at 480° C. for 3 hours under H2 flow (same flow rate). The catalyst was steamed by introducing water vapor (2.2 mmole/min) with a carrier gas of H2 (459 cc/min) at 200° C. overnight. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) [based on methylation feed (toluene+methanol)] was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed of H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig and the catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to 450° C. and then adjusted to about 485° C. (average catalyst bed temperature 498° C.). Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity.
Comparative Catalysts H-J
A “self-bound” P/ZSM-5 extruded catalyst was made by treating a NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite powder having a SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio of between 250 and 300 with H3PO4 and made into an extrudable mixture, which was then extruded into 1/16-inch diameter cylindrical shaped extrudates. The extruded catalyst was then calcined or heated to a maximum temperature of 530° C. This formed Catalyst H. XRF analysis showed Catalyst H had the following composition: SiO2 77.65 wt %, Al2O3 0.53 wt %, P2O5 19.53 wt %, Na20<0.04 wt %. BET (N2 adsorption) surface area and total pore volume of Catalyst H were 168 m2/g and 0.12 cc/g, respectively.
Several nickel loaded catalysts (I and J) were made using Catalyst H by treating it with different amounts of nickel using the same procedure as used for Catalysts B-F (see Table 4). The nickel contents of the Catalysts I and J were 0.08 wt % and 0.25 wt %, respectively, by total weight of catalyst.
Catalysts H, I and J were tested for toluene methylation reaction. Catalyst loading, predrying under H2 flow and steaming conditions were the same as described for Example 3. After the catalyst drying at 480° C. and steaming at 200° C. overnight, a premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 3.0) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) [based on methylation feed (toluene+methanol)] was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed of H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig and the catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to 450° C. and then adjusted to about 485° C. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity.
In summary, the addition of Ni on self-bound P/ZSM-5 did not show increased catalyst activity or improved catalyst stability. This is in contrast to those with the addition of Ni on alumina bound P/ZSM-5 catalysts.
Catalysts K-M
Pt-loaded P/ZSM-5 catalysts were made by adding various amounts of Pt on alumina bound P/ZSM-5 catalyst (Catalyst A) using the same procedure as used for Catalysts C, D, E and F. Catalyst A, described previously, was loaded with different loadings of platinum at 0.05, 0.11 and 0.18 wt % to form Catalysts K, L and M, respectively (see Table 5). The platinum was incorporated with the alumina bound P/ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst (Catalyst A) by dissolving different amounts of tetraamineplatinum (II) nitrate in about 100 ml of deionized water. Catalyst A (extrudates) was immersed in the platinum salt solution in a flask which was then shaken for 5 minutes and was aged at 60° C. overnight. Catalyst extrudate was separated from the aqueous liquid by decanting the liquid. The platinum-treated zeolites were then calcined at a maximum temperature of about 530° C. for 10 hours.
Each of Catalysts K, L and M were tested in toluene methylation reactions. Catalyst loading, heating under H2 flow and steaming conditions were the same as described for Catalyst B in Example 3. After the catalyst drying at 480° C. and steaming at 200° C. overnight, a premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) [based on methylation feed (toluene+methanol)] was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig and the catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to 450° C. and then adjusted to about 485° C. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity.
Catalysts N-O
Pd-loaded P/ZSM-5 catalysts were made by adding various amounts of Pd on alumina bound P/ZSM-5 catalyst (Catalyst A) using the same procedure as used for Catalysts C, D, E and F. Catalyst A, described previously, was loaded with different loadings of palladium at 0.05 and 0.09 wt % to form Catalysts N and O, respectively (see Table 5). The palladium was incorporated with the alumina bound P/ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst (Catalyst A) by dissolving different amounts of palladium nitrate in about 100 ml of deionized water. Catalyst A (extrudates) was immersed in the palladium salt solution in a flask, which was then shaken for 5 minutes and was aged at 60° C. overnight. Catalyst extrudate was separated from the aqueous liquid by decanting the liquid. The palladium loaded catalysts were then calcined at a maximum temperature of about 530° C. for 10 hours.
Each of Catalysts N and O were tested in toluene methylation reactions. Catalyst loading, heating under H2 flow and steaming conditions were the same as described for Catalyst B in Example 3. After treating the catalyst under H2 flow at 480° C. for 3 hours and steaming at 200° C. overnight, a premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) [based on methylation feed (toluene+methanol)] was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig and the catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to 450° C. and then adjusted to about 485° C. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity.
Table 6 shows toluene conversion, methanol conversion, toluene selectivity for mixed xylenes, para-xylene selectivity and methanol selectivity to mixed xylenes for Catalysts A and N-O.
Table 7 shows the comparison of toluene conversion and catalyst deactivation rate (toluene conversion decline rate per 24 hours at constant catalyst bed inlet temperature) between Catalyst A (no metal), Catalyst G (0.10 wt % Ni), Catalyst E (0.09 wt % Ni), Catalyst L (0.11 wt % Pt), Catalyst 0 (0.09 wt % Pd) having almost the same amount of metal on base Catalyst A. Catalyst G was made using the commonly used impregnation technique (evaporated the solution) and showed an increased toluene conversion compared to base Catalyst A (13.5% for Catalyst G versus 11.5% for Catalyst A, which is about a 17% relative increase in activity). Catalyst G also showed improved deactivation rate (−0.012% for Catalyst G versus −0.065% for Catalyst A). Whereas Catalyst E, which was made by decanting Ni salt solution, showed a further increased toluene conversion (14.9% for Catalyst E versus 11.5% for Catalyst A and 13.5% for Catalyst G) and toluene conversion did not decline during the testing period. Catalyst L (0.11 wt % Pt) and Catalyst O (0.09 wt % Pd) made by using the same method as used for Catalyst E (0.09% Ni) showed increased activity compared to base Catalyst A but not as much as for Catalyst E. Like Catalyst E, Catalysts L and O showed no decline in toluene conversion during the testing period.
1Relative activity increase of a catalyst is estimated by comparing toluene conversion obtained on the catalyst compared to that on base catalyst.
2Deactivation rate: Toluene conversion decline, mole % per 24 hour.
Table 7 also shows the comparison of toluene conversion and catalyst deactivation rate between Catalyst H (no metal) and Catalyst I (0.08 wt % Ni). Catalyst H is a self-bound P/ZSM-5 catalyst. Catalyst I was made by using Catalyst H and by using the same method as used for Catalyst E. Unexpectedly, Catalyst I did not show any increase in activity, but rather it showed a dramatic decrease in activity, and toluene conversion declined faster than for the base Catalyst H.
While the invention has been shown in only some of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited, but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3562345 | Mitsche | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3702886 | Argauer et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3950242 | Garwood et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3962364 | Young | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3965207 | Weinstein | Jun 1976 | A |
| 4002697 | Chen | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4025606 | Acres | May 1977 | A |
| 4100215 | Chen | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4115424 | Unland et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4140726 | Unland et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4152364 | Chu | May 1979 | A |
| 4250345 | Chu | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4278827 | Chu et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4363750 | Rozovsky et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4377718 | Sato et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4380685 | Chu | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4409132 | Forbus et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4415477 | Rozovsky et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4417076 | Rozovsky et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4420418 | Chu | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4444989 | Herkes | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4478949 | Kaeding | Oct 1984 | A |
| RE31919 | Butter et al. | Jun 1985 | E |
| 4536375 | Holt et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4548914 | Chu | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4554394 | Forbus et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4590321 | Chu | May 1986 | A |
| 4623530 | Cullo et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4623633 | Young | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4638106 | Pieters et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4657884 | Luft et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4665251 | Chu | May 1987 | A |
| 4670616 | De Simone et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4673767 | Nimry et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4681745 | Pinto | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4694114 | Chu et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4695442 | Pinto et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4695666 | Chao et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4695667 | Sumitani et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4704495 | Dessau | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4716135 | Chen | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4721827 | Cullo et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4727209 | Chao | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4746763 | Kocal | May 1988 | A |
| 4758328 | Young | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4761513 | Steacy | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4781815 | Pellet et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4822943 | Burress | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4847223 | Le Van Mao et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4861930 | Cottrell et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4873067 | Valyocsik et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4891197 | Derouane et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4891467 | Sikkenga | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4902406 | Valyocsik | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4910007 | Pinto et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4912073 | Chu | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4914067 | Pellet et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4935574 | D'Amore et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4962255 | Fraenkel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4973399 | Green et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4973781 | Valyocsik et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4980052 | Green et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5041402 | Casci et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5043502 | Martindale et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047141 | Chu | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5068483 | Barthomeuf et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5094995 | Butt et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5105047 | Waller | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108579 | Casci | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5110776 | Chitnis et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5124299 | Waller | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5171921 | Gaffney et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173461 | Absil et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5178748 | Casci et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5210356 | Shamshoum et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5227558 | Shamshoum et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5231064 | Absil et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5233102 | Butt et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5244852 | Lachman et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5246688 | Faust et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5248841 | Young | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5254767 | Dwyer | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254770 | Olson et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5294332 | Klotz | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5294578 | Ho et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5315033 | Butt et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318696 | Kowalski | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5321183 | Chang et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5330732 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336478 | Dwyer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5336824 | Shamshoum et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5345021 | Casci et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5348643 | Absil et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5349113 | Chang et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5365003 | Chang et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366948 | Absil et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367100 | Gongwei et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371307 | Guth et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378670 | Kumar | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380690 | Zhicheng et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5385718 | Casci et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387732 | Shamshoum et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399336 | Guth et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5430212 | Butt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5430213 | Hendriksen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5446234 | Casci et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5455213 | Chang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456821 | Absil et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464799 | Casci et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5475179 | Chang et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5498814 | Chang et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5503818 | Nicolaides | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512260 | Kiliany et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5516736 | Chang et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5523510 | Pellet et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5529964 | Weitkamp et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534239 | Fajula et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5536894 | Degnan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541146 | Chang et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5561095 | Chen et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563310 | Chang et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569805 | Beck et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571768 | Chang et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573746 | Chen | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576256 | Monque et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5607888 | Chang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607890 | Chen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5646314 | Crocco et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5648580 | Chen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658454 | Absil et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5675047 | Beck et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5689024 | Schmitt | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5698756 | Beck et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5726114 | Chang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5780563 | Chen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5789335 | Chen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5811613 | Bhat et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5833840 | Absil et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5847255 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856603 | Rekker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5902919 | Chen et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5905051 | Wu et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907073 | Ghosh | May 1999 | A |
| 5907074 | Wu et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5922922 | Harris et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5925586 | Sun | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5939597 | Dessau et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951963 | He et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952535 | King et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955641 | Chen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5968463 | Shelef et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5990031 | Ghosh | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994550 | Chitnis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994603 | Mohr et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6034283 | Ban et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040257 | Drake et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046128 | Kisen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047544 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048816 | Brown et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6057485 | Merrill et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060633 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6074975 | Yao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080303 | Cao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080698 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083865 | Drake et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6090274 | Wu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6090991 | Butler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096938 | Ghosh | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6100437 | Koehl et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6124227 | Yao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6150293 | Verduijn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156949 | Brown et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160191 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6187982 | Beck et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6211104 | Shi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217748 | Hatanaka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222084 | Ghosh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6251263 | Hatanaka et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6268305 | Butler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6294493 | Strohmaier et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6300535 | van den Berge et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306790 | Rodriguez et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319484 | Shore et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6342153 | Guan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6346190 | Khare | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6388156 | Ou et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395664 | Boehner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399530 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417421 | Yao | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423879 | Brown et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6444610 | Yamamoto | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459006 | Ou et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469095 | Gareiss et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6503862 | Yamamoto | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6504072 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6504074 | Berduijn et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6506954 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6518213 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6548725 | Froment et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6566293 | Vogt et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6589901 | Yamamoto | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6613708 | Ou et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6613951 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6642426 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6689929 | Williams et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6699811 | Mohr et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6723297 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6726834 | Quesada et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6770251 | Yoshikawa | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6773694 | Lesch et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6799089 | Toulhoat | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6811684 | Mohr et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6812181 | van der Berge et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6864399 | Merrill et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6943131 | Ghosh et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7060644 | Ghosh et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7060864 | Ghosh et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7084318 | Ghosh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7105713 | Ghosh et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7119239 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7176339 | Iaccino et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7186873 | Feng et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7196237 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7232516 | Sughure, II et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7244869 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7279608 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7285511 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7304194 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7363410 | Bian et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368410 | Ghosh et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7396967 | Iaccino et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7399727 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7446069 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7507685 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7560608 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7576026 | Ghosh et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7662737 | Ghosh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7674942 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 20030004383 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121827 | van den Berge et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030127360 | van den Berge et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040004023 | Sughrue, II et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087822 | Buchanan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158111 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040262200 | Sughure, II et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050020435 | Beck et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070749 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075524 | Feng et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143613 | Dakka et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194289 | Overbeek et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050202956 | Sterte et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060151358 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015658 | Turaga et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225156 | Sughure, II et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080058564 | Iaccino et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176736 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090253949 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100168489 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 61221137 | Oct 1971 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| F.M. Bautista, et al., Toluene Methylation on AlPO4—Al2O3 Catalysts, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1996, pp. 61-70, vol. 57, No. 1. |
| Oyvind Mikkelsen, et al., Use of Isotopic Labeling for Mechanistic Studies of the Methanol-to-Hydrocarbons reaction. Methylation of toluene with Methanol Over H-ZSM-5, H-Mordenite and H-Beta, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2000, pp. 93-113, vol. 40. |
| P.G. Smirniotis, et al., Alkylation of Benzene or Toluene with MeOH or C2H4 over ZSM-5 or B-Zeolite: Effect of the Zeolite Pore Openings and of the Hydrocarbons Involved on the Mechanism of Alkylation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1995, pp. 1517-1528, vol. 34. |
| F.M. Bautista, et al., Continuous Flow Toluene Methylation Over AlPO4 and AlPO4—Al2O3 Catalysts, Catalysis Letters, 1994, pp. 159-167, vol. 26. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/05613; International Filing Date Oct. 14, 2009, Date of Mailing Dec. 11, 2009; 2 pages. |
| Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2009/05613; International Filing Date Oct. 14, 2009, Date of Mailing Dec. 11, 2009; 5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100113850 A1 | May 2010 | US |
