Patent Application
20230416702
The present invention relates to the field of phytases.
Phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolase) are phosphatase enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of phytic acid (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate)—an indigestible, organic form of phosphorus that is found in grains and oil seeds—and releases a usable form of inorganic phosphorus. Phytases have been found to occur in animals, plants, fungi and bacteria. Phytases used in feed applications were initially of fungal origin but today are dominated by bacterial enzymes. Phytases can be grouped based on their pH activity optima, as acid or alkaline phytases, their catalytic mechanism and enzyme fold, as histidine acid, cysteine, or purple acid phosphatases, or B-propeller phytases, or by the stereoselectivity of phytate degradation as 3- or 6-phytase. The EC database accounts for this stereoselectivity by defining two classes, 3.1.3.8 and 3.1.3.26, the two classes that are used commercially. Phytases belonging to the group 3.1.3.72 (PTP-like phytases) and 3.1.3.2 (purple acid phosphatase) are rare and not exploited commercially.
Phytic acid and its metabolites have several important roles in seeds and grains, most notably, phytic acid functions as a phosphorus store, as an energy store, as a source of cations and as a source of myo-inositol (a cell wall precursor). Phytic acid is the principal storage form of phosphorus in plant seeds and the major source of phosphorus in the grain-based diets used in intensive livestock operations. The organic phosphate found in phytic acid is largely unavailable to the animals that consume it, but the inorganic phosphate that phytases release can be easily absorbed. Ruminant animals can use phytic acid as a source of phosphorus because the bacteria that inhabit their gut are well-characterized producers of many types of phytases.
However, monogastric animals cannot use phytic acid as a major source of phosphorus, due to a lack of sufficient amount of phytase produced by the gastro intestinal microbiota, and it is excreted in the feces.
In ruminants (cattle, sheep), phytase is produced by bacteria found in the gut making it possible for them to use the phytic acid found in grains as a source of phosphorus. Non-ruminants (monogastric animals) like humans, dogs, birds, etc. do not produce phytase. Research in the field of animal nutrition has put forth the idea of supplementing feed with phytase so as to make available to the animal phytate-bound nutrients like calcium, phosphorus, other minerals, carbohydrates, and proteins.
Phytase is used as an animal feed supplement—often in poultry and swine—to enhance the nutritive value of plant material by liberation of inorganic phosphate from phytic acid (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate). Phytase can be purified from transgenic microbes and has been produced recently in transgenic canola, alfalfa and rice plants. Phytase can also be produced on a large scale through cellulosic biomass fermentation using genetically modified (GM) yeast.
In many applications, improved stability of the enzyme is a significant advantage. Improved thermostability helps to increase the processability of the respective phytase, because the latter oftentimes undergoes thermal treatment during the manufacturing process.
This applies, inter alia, for the use of phytases in animal feed. During feed processing, the feed is often subjected to heat, e.g., by application of steam, to reduce or eliminate pathogens, increase storage life of the feed and optimized utilization of the ingredients leading to improved feed conversion. The conditioning time can vary from a few seconds up to several minutes depending on the type and formulation of the feed. The temperature during conditioning typically ranges from 70° C. to 100° C. After conditioning, the feed is sometimes extruded through a pelleting die, which for a short time raises the temperature of the feed incrementally due to heat dissipation caused by friction.
Yet in other applications, phytase enzymes are exposed to heat as well. Because phytases are proteins, they are susceptible to denaturation by heat and pressure. Denaturing essentially alters the structure of the enzyme, resulting in decreased activity levels and decreased efficacy of the enzyme.
There are different ways to improve phytase stability or protect phytases from thermal impact. In animal feed applications, one option is post-pellet liquid application, which is relatively complex and expensive because it requires the purchase and installation of specialized equipment, space in which to store the liquid enzyme and careful calculation of the amount of enzyme to apply.
Another option is the application of a protective coating before pelleting of the synthetic phytase with other ingredients (e.g., in feed). This approach, which is for example described in Partridge (2007), may reduce the efficacy of the enzyme because the coating may not fully dissolve, e.g., in the digestive tract of the animal. It is furthermore difficult to achieve a coating design that can withstand the high heat and moisture content of the pelleting process, but subsequently dissolve in the lower temperature and higher moisture conditions, e.g., in the animal's gut.
Another option is to use intrinsically thermostable phytases. These phytases can theoretically be derived from thermophilic and hyperthermophilic organisms and have unique structure and function properties of high thermostability. However, these phytases may suffer from other limitations, like suboptimal activity, specificity, bioavailability, pH-range or processability.
It is hence one object of the present invention to provide stable phytase variants which do not suffer from the above discussed limitations.
These and further objects are met with methods and means according to the independent claims of the present invention. The dependent claims are related to specific embodiments.
Before the invention is described in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular component parts or structural features of the devices or compositions described or process steps of the methods described as such devices and methods may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for purposes of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope. It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include singular and/or plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Further, in the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps.
It is moreover to be understood that, in case parameter ranges are given which are delimited by numeric values, the ranges are deemed to include these limitation values.
It is further to be understood that embodiments disclosed herein are not meant to be understood as individual embodiments which would not relate to one another. Features discussed with one embodiment are meant to be disclosed also in connection with other embodiments shown herein. If, in one case, a specific feature is not disclosed with one embodiment, but with another, the skilled person would understand that does not necessarily mean that said feature is not meant to be disclosed with said other embodiment. The skilled person would understand that it is the gist of this application to disclose said feature also for the other embodiment, but that just for purposes of clarity and to keep the specification in a manageable volume this has not been done.
According one aspect of the invention, a synthetic phytase is provided which is a shuffling product comprising biobricks of at least two reference phytases of Obesumbacterium and/or Hafnia.
The inventors have found out that the phytases of Obesumbacterium and Hafnia turned out to be the highly promising starting points (domain structure, sequence similarity, and the like) to obtain functional shuffling constructs wot potentially increased stability, based on a molecular modeling process as disclosed elsewhere herein.
The term “biobricks”, as used herein, relates to standardized building bricks consisting of DNA sequences that are fragments of a larger DNA, cDNA, RNA or mRNA sequence encoding for proteins with a specific and defined function. “Biobricks” exhibit the same cutting sites, wherefore they are easy to combine. Here, the used DNA sequences encode for a phytase enzyme and are used as building blocks to reassemble a synthetic, “shuffled” DNA encoding for a synthetic, “shuffled”, phytase enzyme. More precisely, DNA sequences of Obesumbacterium and/or Hafnia encoding for the respective phytase enzyme are used as building blocks and are reassembled to a synthetic “shuffled” phytase enzyme.
The term “reference phytase”, as used herein, relates to a DNA, cDNA, RNA or mRNA sequence encoding for a phytase enzyme that is being used as the starting point of the method, as the source for such biobricks, or to the phytase enzyme encoded thereof.
A “shuffling product”, as used herein, is an enzyme which consists of two or more such biobricks from at least two different reference phytases. In the shuffling product, the biobricks from the different reference phytases have been reassembled in a specific or random order, in order to modify the characteristics of the reference phytases.
In one embodiment, the different reference phytases have been fragmented to obtain biobricks of corresponding function, orientation in the reference phytases and/or similar length.
For example, fragmentation of reference phytase A delivers biobricks 1, 2 and 3, while fragmentation of reference phytase B delivers corresponding biobricks 1′, 2′ and 3′.
Biobricks 1 and 1′, biobricks 2 and 2′ and biobricks 3 and 3′, respectively, have corresponding function, orientation in the reference phytases and/or similar length, and are hence called “corresponding biobricks”.
In one embodiment, upon reassembly, one member out of each set of corresponding biobricks is selected, and the selected biobricks are combined to reproduce the orientation of the different biobricks in one of the reference phytases like e.g. 1′-2-3, 1-2′-3 or the like.
In one embodiment, the process itself does not introduce “new” amino acids residues or amino acid substitutions which go beyond what is being done in the mere shuffling process. As a consequence, the resulting shuffling product does not comprise “new” amino acids residues or amino acid substitutions which go beyond what is being done in the mere shuffling process.
Enzyme shuffling methods are for example disclosed in Engler et al. (2009), the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Obesumbacterium and Hafnia are both genus of the family Hafniaceae, order Enterobacterales, which are Gram-negative bacteria.
In one embodiment, the reference phytase is a wildtype phytase of Obesumbacterium and/or Hafnia. In another embodiment, the “reference phytase” is a mutated phytase derived from such a wildtype phytase, e.g., a variant which has at least 1 amino acid substitutions compared to, or at least 80% sequence identity with, such wildtype phytase, while maintaining its phytase activity.
In preferred embodiments, the mutated phytase has ≥81, ≥82, ≥83, ≥84, ≥85, ≥86, ≥87, ≥88, ≥89, ≥90, ≥91, ≥92, ≥93, ≥94, ≥95, ≥96, ≥97, ≥98, most preferably ≥99% sequence identity with such wildtype phytase.
In preferred embodiments, the mutated phytase has 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 or 83 amino acid substitutions compared to such wildtype phytase.
According to one embodiment, at least one reference phytase is, or is derived from, a wildtype phytase of, Hafnia alvei and/or Obesumbacterium proteus.
The term “derived from” relates to an enzyme variant which has at least 1 amino acid substitutions compared to, or at least 80% sequence identity with, such wildtype phytase, while maintaining its phytase activity.
In preferred embodiments, the enzyme variant has ≥81, ≥82, ≥83, ≥84, ≥85, ≥86, ≥87, ≥88, ≥89, ≥90, ≥91, ≥92, ≥93, ≥94, ≥95, ≥96, ≥97, ≥98, most preferably ≥99% sequence identity with such wildtype phytase.
In preferred embodiments, the enzyme variant has 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 or 83 amino acid substitutions compared to such wildtype phytase.
According to one embodiment, at least one reference phytase comprises at least one of
In preferred embodiments, the enzyme variant has ≥81, ≥82, ≥83, ≥84, ≥85, ≥86, ≥87, ≥88, ≥89, ≥90, ≥91, ≥92, ≥93, ≥94, ≥95, ≥96, ≥97, ≥98, most preferably ≥99% sequence identity relative to the respective SEQ ID NO as specified in a).
In preferred embodiments, the enzyme variant has 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 or 83 amino acid substitutions relative to the respective SEQ ID NO as specified in a).
“Percentage of sequence identity” is determined by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over a comparison window, wherein the portion of the polynucleotide sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps) as compared to the reference sequence (e.g., a polypeptide), which does not comprise additions or deletions, for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The percentage is calculated by determining the number of positions at which the identical nucleic acid base or amino acid residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total number of positions in the window of comparison and multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence identity.
The terms “identical” or percent “identity,” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same sequences. Two sequences are “substantially identical” if two sequences have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same (i.e., at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% sequence identity over a specified region, or, when not specified, over the entire sequence of a reference sequence), when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a comparison window, or designated region as measured using one of the following sequence comparison algorithms or by manual alignment and visual inspection.
One suitable algorithm to determine sequence identities is the BLAST algorithm. Another algorithm to determine sequence identities is the Clustal Omega algorithm.
The disclosure provides polypeptides or polynucleotides that are substantially identical to the polypeptides or polynucleotides, respectively, exemplified herein. Optionally, the identity exists over a region that is at least about 15, 25 or 50 nucleotides in length, or more preferably over a region that is 100 to 500 or 1000 or more nucleotides in length, or over the full length of the reference sequence. With respect to amino acid sequences, identity or substantial identity can exist over a region that is at least 5, 10, 15 or 20 amino acids in length, optionally at least about 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 75 or 100 amino acids in length, optionally at least about 150, 200 or 250 amino acids in length, or over the full length of the reference sequence. With respect to shorter amino acid sequences, e.g., amino acid sequences of 20 or fewer amino acids, substantial identity exists when one or two amino acid residues are conservatively substituted, according to the conservative substitutions defined herein.
According to one or more embodiments of the invention, at least one amino acid substitution as discussed above is a conservative amino acid substitution.
A “conservative amino acid substitution” has a smaller effect on enzyme function than a non-conservative substitution. Although there are many ways to classify amino acids, they are often sorted into six main groups on the basis of their structure and the general chemical characteristics of their R groups.
In one embodiment, a “conservative amino acid substitution” is one in which the amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residue having a similar side chain. For example, families of amino acid residues having similar side chains have been defined in the art. These families include amino acids with
Other conserved amino acid substitutions can also occur across amino acid side chain families, such as when substituting an asparagine for aspartic acid in order to modify the charge of a peptide. Thus, a predicted nonessential amino acid residue in a HR domain polypeptide, for example, is preferably replaced with another amino acid residue from the same side chain family or homologues across families (e.g. asparagine for aspartic acid, glutamine for glutamic acid). Conservative changes can further include substitution of chemically homologous non-natural amino acids (i.e. a synthetic non-natural hydrophobic amino acid in place of leucine, a synthetic non-natural aromatic amino acid in place of tryptophan).
As used herein, the term “maintaining its phytase activity” means, for example, that the respective variant has a phytase activity of ≥50% compared to that of the wildtype phytase sequence.
According to one embodiment, the synthetic phytase has one of the following shuffling structures shown in N->C direction:
The following table gives an overview of preferred building block lengths:
According to one embodiment, the synthetic phytase comprises one of
The above-mentioned synthetic phytases are shuffling products comprising biobricks from the Obesumbacterium reference phytase and the Hafnia reference phytase. Surprisingly, the generated synthetic phytases were increased in their thermostability (IT50) compared to their reference phytases. Although the IT50 value of the Hafnia reference phytase is about 63° C. and the IT50 value of the Obesumbacterium reference phytase is about 60° C., all three shuffling products exceed the thermostability of the Hafnia reference phytase and did not demonstrate a mean value of the IT50 values.
In preferred embodiments, the enzyme variant has ≥81, ≥82, ≥83, ≥84, ≥85, ≥86, ≥87, ≥88, ≥89, ≥90, ≥91, ≥92, ≥93, ≥94, ≥95, ≥96, ≥97, ≥98, most preferably ≥99% sequence identity relative to the respective SEQ ID NO as specified in a).
In preferred embodiments, the enzyme variant has 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 or 83 amino acid substitutions relative to the respective SEQ ID NO as specified in a).
According to one or more embodiments of the invention, at least one amino acid substitution as discussed above is a conservative amino acid substitution.
According to one embodiment, the synthetic phytase has an increased stability compared to one of the reference phytases.
According to one embodiment, said increased stability is increased thermostability (IT50) compared to one of the reference phytases.
Note, in this context, that the IT50 of the reference phytases are as follows:
The term “thermostability” as used herein refers to the ability of an enzyme to have equal or greater activity compared to the wild type under standard conditions, and an increased ability to retain activity after exposure to increased temperatures.
According to one embodiment, the synthetic phytase has an IT50 of ≥60° C. According to further embodiments, the synthetic phytase has an IT50 of ≥65° C., ≥70° C., ≥75° C., ≥80° C., or ≥85° C.
According to one embodiment, the synthetic phytase has an IT50 of ≤110° C. According to further embodiments, the synthetic phytase has an IT50 of ≤105° C.; ≤100° C.; or ≤98° C.
According to one embodiment, the synthetic phytase has an IT50 of between ≥60° C. and ≤110° C. According to further embodiments, the synthetic phytase has an IT50 of between ≥65° C. and ≤105° C., between ≥70° C. and ≤100° C., between ≥75° C. and ≤98° C. between ≥80° C. and ≤98° C. or between ≥85° C. and ≤98° C.
According to one embodiment, said increased stability is increased stability against protease digestion (also called “protease resistance”) compared to one of the reference phytases.
The stability against protease digestion can be measured by exposure to the protease K1 (Kumamolisin AS1, as described in WO2017220776A1). Such stability is quite important because very often phytases are combined with proteases and then used in a specific purpose. Hence, the risk exists that the protease will deactivate, or even digest, the concomitantly added phytase.
In addition or as an alternative, the stability against protease digestion can be measured by exposure to the protease pepsin. Such stability is quite important because when used in feed applications, the phytase will have to survive and be active in the gastric environment where pepsin is present and active. Hence, the risk exists that the protease will deactivate, or even digest, the concomitantly added phytase.
As a result of any enzyme optimization process, the optimization of one parameter can affect other parameters. For example, increasing thermostability can at the same time also increase or reduce protease stability or pH stability.
In the present case of a phytase for animal feed purposes, in one embodiment, thermostability may have priority over protease stability or pH stability. This means that in case that, in a given shuffling product, a substantial increase in IT50 is achieved, slight losses in protease stability or pH stability may be acceptable (e.g., losses of −10 or −20%).
According to one embodiment, said increased stability is increased pH stability (also called “pH resistance”) compared to one of the reference phytases.
The term “pH stability” as used herein refers to the ability of an enzyme to have equal or greater activity compared to the wild type under standard conditions, and an increased ability to retain activity after exposure to acidic conditions (e.g., pH 4.0 or lower).
According to one other aspect of the invention, a nucleic acid molecule is provided which encodes a synthetic phytase according to the above description.
In one embodiment, such nucleic acid molecule is codon optimized for the expression in eukaryotic hosts, preferably from the group of yeasts and fungi, most preferably for Pichia pastoris, Aspergillus sp. and Trichoderma sp.
Codon optimization is a useful technology for improving the expression of heterologous proteins. Indeed, there is a large difference between the codon usage of the host cell genome sequence and the native heterologous protein encoding sequence, which will obviously affect the expression of recombinant proteins. Some reports have shown that the production of the target proteins was often increased an average of 1- to 5-fold by optimizing the heterologous protein-encoding sequence based on the codon bias of the host cell.
Codon optimization is a species-specific process, and the skilled artisan is able to derive, from respective literature reference, suitable codon optimizations schemes for a given expression host. Respective teachings are provided, e.g., in Yu et al (2013), Rosemary et al (2017) and Yang and Liu (2010), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for enablement purposes.
According to one other aspect of the invention, a plasmid or vector system comprising the nucleic acid molecule is provided.
According to one other aspect of the invention, a host cell capable of heterologous protein expression is provided, said host cell comprising a plasmid or vector system comprising the nucleic acid molecule according to the above description.
According to yet one other aspect of the invention, the heterologous protein expression is achieved by insertion of the said nucleic acid molecule into the genome of the said host cell. The genomic insertion is achieved using homologous recombination based state-of-the-art techniques and genome-editing using programmable nucleases, e.g. CRISPR-Cas, Zn-finger or TAL endonucleases.
In different embodiments, such host cell is at least one selected from a bacterial cell, fungal cell or a yeast cell.
Exemplary bacterial cells include E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia sp., Campylobacter sp., Wolinella sp., Desulfovibrio sp., Vibrio sp., Pseudomonas sp. Bacillus sp., Bacteroides sp., Listeria sp., Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., Peptostreptococcus sp., Megasphaera sp., Pectinatus sp., Selenomonas sp., Zymophilus sp., Actinomyces sp., Arthrobacter sp., Frankia sp., Micromonospora sp., Nocardia sp., Propionibacterium sp., Streptomyces sp., Lactobacillus sp., Lactococcus sp., Leuconostoc sp., Pediococcus sp., Acetobacterium sp., Agrobacterium sp., Aliivibrio sp., Eubacterium sp., Haloarcula sp., Halobacterium sp., Heliobacterium sp., Heliospirillum sp., Sporomusa sp., Spiroplasma sp., Ureaplasma sp., Erysipelothrix, sp., Corynebacterium sp. Enterococcus sp., Clostridium sp., Mycoplasma sp., Mycobacterium sp., Actinobacteria sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Moraxella sp., Helicobacter sp, Paracoccidioides sp., Stenotrophomonas sp., Micrococcus sp., Neisseria sp., Bdellovibrio sp., Hemophilus sp., Thermus sp., Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Enterobacter sp., Serratia sp., Citrobacter sp., Pseudomonas sp., Proteus sp., Rhodobacter sp., Rhodopseudomonas sp., Rhodospirillum sp., Serratia sp., Yersinia sp., Acinetobacter sp., Actinobacillus sp. Bordetella sp., Brucella sp., Capnocytophaga sp., Cardiobacterium sp., Eikenella sp., Francisella sp., Haemophilus sp., Kingella sp., Pasteurella sp., Flavobacterium sp. Xanthomonas sp., Burkholderia sp., Aeromonas sp., Plesiomonas sp., Legionella sp. and alpha-proteobacteria such as Wolbachia sp., Comamonas sp., Pyrobaculum sp., Sinorhizobium sp., Cyanobacteria, spirochaetes, green sulfur and green non-sulfur bacteria, Gram-negative cocci, Gram negative bacilli. In a preferred embodiment the bacterial cell is Bacillus subtilis.
Exemplary fungi or yeast cells include Pichia sp., Aspergillus sp., Kluyveromyces sp., Saccharomyces sp., Candida sp., Trichoderma sp., Penicillium sp., Neurospora sp., Chrysosporium sp., Cladosporium sp., Phytophthora sp., Scytalidium sp., more preferred Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, Trichoderma reesei, Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, and Neurospora crassa.
In a preferred embodiment the yeast cell is Pichia pastoris. This methanol utilizing yeast is a widely used eukaryotic production host for the expression of recombinant proteins, known also as Konagataella phaffii.
In further embodiments, such host cell is a eukaryotic host cell selected from the group consisting of plant cells, insect cells or mammalian cells.
According to one other aspect of the invention, a feed additive, feed ingredient, feed supplement, and/or feedstuff comprising a synthetic phytase according to the above description is provided.
According to one other aspect of the invention, the use of a synthetic phytase according to the above description is provided for the manufacture of a feedstuff.
According to one other aspect of the invention, a process of developing a synthetic phytase according to the above description is provided, which process comprises:
In one embodiment, steps b)-c) are repeated two or more times.
The type II restriction enzyme is preferably a type IIS restriction enzyme, preferably BsaI, BsmBI, and BbsI. Unlike standard Type II restriction enzymes like EcoRI and BamHI, these enzymes cut DNA outside of their recognition sites and, therefore, can create non-palindromic overhangs. Since 256 potential overhang sequences are possible, multiple fragments of DNA can be assembled by using combinations of overhang sequences.
The ligase is preferably a T4 DNA ligase.
The restriction step b) is preferably carried out a temperature of 35-40° C. (preferably, 37° C.), while the ligation step c) is preferably carried out a temperature of 10-20° C. (preferably, 16° C.).
In one embodiment, the process is carried in a thermal cycler, with a protocol that oscillates between, e.g., 37° C. (for restriction) and, e.g., 16° C. (for ligation) many times.
According to one embodiment, the process further comprises
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive; the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. Any reference signs should not be construed as limiting the scope. All amino acid sequences disclosed herein are shown from N-terminus to C-terminus; all nucleic acid sequences disclosed herein are shown 5′->3′.
Phytases belonging to the same protein family, based on a multiple structure-based alignment of the histidine acid phytase superfamily employing the 3DM system (Bio Prodict, Nijmegen. NL), and having different beneficial traits, were clustered. This phytase cluster was analyzed for potential fragmentation sites. These fragmentation sites were selected to be at amino acid positions conserved in all proteins of the cluster, being outside helices and B-sheets and being a proline or in close proximity to a proline (3 amino acids). Libraries consisted of at least two proteins and at last two preferably more, fragments, called biobricks.
In this process, the phytases of Obesumbacterium and Hafnia turned out to be the most promising starting points (domain structure, sequence similarity, and the like) to obtain functional shuffling constructs with potentially increased stability.
The biobricks are generated by PCR introducing Type IIs restriction sites that generate sequence-specific overhangs. Recombination of these biobricks maintained the sequence of the structural elements and does not introduce amino acid changes to the biobricks or extra amino acids. The procedure further ensured that none of the biobricks from different parent backbones is discriminated or preferentially integrated, so that all possible combinations can be obtained by the process.
The method can be generally used to recombine homologous proteins with each other. At least one of the proteins should have a solved crystal structure, from which the structure of the homologous proteins can be derived via a homology comparison, such as a structure based alignment.
In the recombination of different bacterial phytases, three domains were selected. Prolines, which terminate the selected protein domains, were selected as recombination sites.
Samples were diluted in ddH2O containing 0.01% Triton-X-100 according to their volumetric activity. Diluted samples were than assayed in Nunc 384 well clear flat bottom plate. The reaction was started by adding 1 part assay buffer to one part diluted sample and incubation at 37° C. for 30 min in a thermoshaker. The reaction was subsequently stopped by adding an equal volume of stop solution. The color reaction was started by adding an equal volume of color reagent solution and incubation at 25° C. in the dark for 20 minutes. The absorbance at 650 nm was measured and the amount of phosphate liberated by the phytase was evaluated against an inorganic phosphate standard curve measured under the same conditions.
IT50 defines the temperature where 50% of the activity is inactivated under the conditions described below. Although not equivalent to, it is a measure for the thermal stability in the application, e.g. pelleting conditions.
The supernatants of submerse cultivation of bacterial or fungal strains producing the phytase or phytase variant of interest were diluted in thermo incubation buffer. Aliquots of 50 μl were incubated for 10 minutes in a PCR machine at an appropriate thermal gradient. A second aliquot was incubated at 25° C. After the thermal incubation the sample is kept at 25° C. and assayed for residual activity by the phytase activity assay described under example 2. Results are shown in the table/
Supernatant of submerse cultivation of bacterial or fungal strains producing the phytase or phytase variant of interest were diluted according to their volumetric activity in dilution buffer. The activity was measured according to the assay described under example 1, with modification of the assay buffers for the required pH. The reaction was started by adding 8 parts of one of the above buffers to provide activity measurements at ambient pH from pH 2.0 to 7.0. The reaction was stopped and inorganic phosphate was measured as described in example 2. Results are shown in the table/
The procedure provides information about the resistance against acid proteases, as residual activity. Acid proteases tested are pepsin and the acid protease Kumamolisin AS (K1; see for example European patent publications EP16206367, EP16176044, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference) as a representative for the acid protease of the protease families S53 and G1.
One part of the supernatants of submerse cultivation of bacterial or fungal strains producing the phytase or phytase variant of interest were diluted with 1 one part of the above buffers, to test for the stability against acid pH, acid pH and pepsin or acid pH and protease K1. Assays were incubated for 30 minutes at 37° C. The residual activity is measured immediately after the incubation as described in example 2. Results are shown in the table/
The content of the prior art documents referred to herein is incorporated by reference. This refers, particularly, for prior art documents that disclose standard or routine methods. In that case, the incorporation by reference has mainly the purpose to provide sufficient enabling disclosure, and avoid lengthy repetitions.
The following sequences form part of the disclosure of the present application. A WIPO ST 25 compatible electronic sequence listing is provided with this application, too. For the avoidance of doubt, if discrepancies exist between the sequences in the following table and the electronic sequence listing, the sequences in this table shall be deemed to be the correct ones.
Hafnia alvei wildtype
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20208205.3 | Nov 2020 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/082016 | 11/17/2021 | WO |
