The disclosed embodiments relate to internationalization and localization. More specifically, the disclosed embodiments relate to techniques for stack-based adaptive localization and internationalization of applications.
Applications may be adapted to the languages, regions, and/or technical requirements of multiple markets using localization and/or internationalization. In localization, strings may be translated and application resources may be managed for multiple languages. With internationalization, applications may be designed, organized, and/or implemented to adapt the applications to different languages, regions, and/or data models without engineering changes.
However, conventional techniques for localization and/or internationalization may be difficult to scale across a large number of languages, locales, and/or technical requirements. For example, a financial-management application may support 100 languages and be deployed in 50 different countries, each with a different set of accounting and/or tax rules. If each set of accounting and/or tax rules is associated with an average of 50 user-interface components, the application may require 2500 different user-interface components, each with 100 different translations and/or other language-specific content. In turn, the significant size and complexity of the application may negatively impact the use of resources by the application and/or result in significant overhead during updating and/or maintenance of the application.
Consequently, the development, management, execution, and maintenance of applications may be facilitated by mechanisms for scaling the applications across languages, locales, and/or technical requirements.
The disclosed embodiments provide a system that facilitates use of an application. During operation, the system obtains a language stack containing an ordered set of preferred languages for a user of the application. Next, for each user-interface component from a set of user-interface components in the application, the system obtains content for the user-interface component based on an order of languages in the language stack. The system then includes the content in the user-interface component during use of the application on an electronic device by the user.
In some embodiments, the system also obtains the set of user-interface components based on a globalization setting for the application.
In some embodiments, obtaining the set of user-interface components based on the globalization setting involves obtaining a business-logic stack of one or more sets of business rules associated with the globalization setting, and including the user-interface component in the set of user-interface components based on an order of the one or more sets of business rules in the business-logic stack.
In some embodiments, including the user-interface component in the set of user-interface components based on the order of the one or more sets of business rules in the business-logic stack involves:
In some embodiments, the globalization setting is associated with at least one of a locale, an organization, and a category.
In some embodiments, obtaining the language stack of preferred languages for the user involves including a default language at a bottom of the language stack, and adding one or more languages to the language stack based on at least one of a locale setting associated with the electronic device and the globalization setting.
In some embodiments, obtaining content for the user-interface component based on the order of languages in the language stack involves:
In some embodiments, the user-interface component includes at least one of a string, a graphical object, a display setting, and a file.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing code and/or data now known or later developed.
The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.
Furthermore, methods and processes described herein can be included in hardware modules or apparatus. These modules or apparatus may include, but are not limited to, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a dedicated or shared processor that executes a particular software module or a piece of code at a particular time, and/or other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules or apparatus are activated, they perform the methods and processes included within them.
The disclosed embodiments provide a method and system for facilitating use of an application. More specifically, the disclosed embodiments provide a method and system for performing stack-based adaptive localization and internationalization of the application.
As shown in
Application 110 may then be used to perform a set of tasks for a user of electronic device 100. For example, application 110 may allow the user to browse websites, send and receive emails, create and edit documents, access and/or organize digital media, play a game, use mapping and/or navigation services, and/or manage finances on portable electronic device 100.
During use of application 110, electronic device 100 may use a network connection to obtain data associated with application 110 from a server and transmit updates to the data to the server. For example, electronic device 100 may use a wireless and/or cellular network to send and receive emails, financial information, digital media, documents, game play information, and/or other data used by application 110 with the server. As a result, application 110 may execute using a client-server model.
In addition, interaction between the user and application 110 may be enabled by a user interface 132. For example, user interface 132 may be a graphical user interface (GUI) that displays text, images, documents, menus, icons, thumbnails, form fields, data, and/or other user-interface components (e.g., user-interface component 1 122, user-interface component x 124) to the user. The GUI may also accept user input (e.g., gestures, keyboard presses, etc.) that is used to manipulate and/or update the user-interface components. In other words, user interface 132 may be a mechanism for providing and/or formatting data and/or features associated with application 110 for use on electronic device 100.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that user-interface components in user interface 132 may be adapted to the language, region, and/or technical requirements of the user and/or electronic device 100. For example, localization of application 110 may be performed to manage and/or translate resources in application 110 for use with multiple languages. Moreover, internationalization of application 110 may enable the adaptation of application 110 to different languages, regions, and/or data models without requiring engineering changes to application 110.
On the other hand, conventional techniques for performing localization and internationalization, including support for localization and/or internationalization on the platform of electronic device 100, may not scale across large numbers of languages, technical requirements, and/or locales. For example, application 110 may have a different set of business rules (e.g., business rules 1 116, business rules n 118) for each of 50 countries in which application 110 is deployed. Application 110 may also be translated into 100 different languages and/or dialects. If each country-specific implementation of application 110 has 50 user-interface components, a user-interface repository 120 for the whole application 110 may have 2500 different user-interface components. Moreover, a content repository 126 containing language-specific content (e.g., content 1 128, content y 130) for the user-interface components may have 250,000 different strings, graphical objects, display settings, and/or files for inclusion in the user-interface components. The large amount and/or complexity of user-interface components and content may negatively impact the installation, execution, maintenance, and/or update of application 110.
In one or more embodiments, the system of
In particular, a globalization framework 102 for application 110 may combine user-interface components and content for the user-interface components in application 110 based on locale setting 112 for electronic device 100, a globalization setting 138 for application 110, a language stack 134 of preferred languages, and a business-logic stack 136 of sets of business rules. Globalization framework 102 includes a language-management apparatus 104, an internationalization apparatus 106, and a localization apparatus 108. Each of the components of globalization framework 102 is discussed in further detail below.
Locale setting 112 may correspond to a language, region, and/or other attributes associated with variants of user-interface components in application 110 and/or electronic device 100. Locale setting 112 may be set by the user during activation and/or configuration of electronic device 100. Electronic device 100 may then use locale setting 112 to provide text, images, audio, video, color schemes, files and/or other content specific to locale setting 112 to the user.
On the other hand, globalization setting 138 may be specific to application 110 and relate to a locale, an organization, and/or a category associated with business rules and/or business logic of application 110. For example, globalization setting 138 may include the country in which the user and/or an organization associated with the user (e.g., the user's company) are located. In turn, globalization setting 138 may be used to select one or more sets of business rules (e.g., business rules 1 116, business rules n 118) from a business-logic repository 114 for performing country-specific tasks such as managing finances and/or filing taxes. In another example, globalization setting 138 may include demographic information, such as age, height, weight, gender, and/or ethnicity. Application 110 and/or globalization framework 102 may use the demographic information to select an appropriate set of business rules for tracking and/or managing the user's health.
As shown in
Next, language-management apparatus 104 may add one or more languages to language stack 134 based on locale setting 112 and/or globalization setting 138. Continuing with the above example, language-management apparatus 104 may add a language associated with globalization setting 138 to language stack 134 above the default language, and a language associated with locale setting 112 to language stack 134 above the language associated with globalization setting 138. If the languages associated with locale setting 112 and/or globalization setting 138 are region-specific, language-management apparatus 104 may also include generic versions of the languages in language stack 134. Unlike the default language, other languages in language stack 134 do not have to have content for all user-interface components of application 110.
Language stack 134 may then be used by localization apparatus 108 to select content for inclusion in user-interface components of application 110. More specifically, localization apparatus 108 may obtain content for each user-interface component in application 110 based on the order of languages in language stack 134, starting with the topmost language. For example, language stack 134 may include the following languages, from top to bottom: French-Canada, French-Generic, Spanish-Generic, English. As a result, localization apparatus 108 may attempt to obtain content for the user-interface component in Canadian French, then generic French, then generic Spanish, then English. In other words, localization apparatus 108 may obtain content for the user-interface component as available content in content repository 126 that is associated with a language that is as close to the top of language stack 134 as possible. If no content is available for the top three languages in language stack 134, localization apparatus 108 may use content from the default language (e.g., English) at the bottom of language stack 134, since such content is required to be available.
After the content is obtained, localization apparatus 108 may include the content in the user-interface component during use of application 110 by the user. For example, localization apparatus 108 may insert and/or “inject” the content into the user-interface component during runtime of application 110. In addition, changes to the language associated with locale setting 112 and/or globalization setting 138 may be dynamically reflected in application 110 by language-management apparatus 104 and/or localization apparatus 108. For example, a change in language from English to German in locale setting 112 may result in the display of German strings and/or content in application 110 without requiring restarting and/or reinstallation of application 110 on electronic device 100.
Unlike language stack 134, business-logic stack 136 may be created by internationalization apparatus 106 as an ordered list of one or more sets of business rules, with the highest-priority set of business rules placed at the top of business-logic stack 136 and the lowest-priority set of business rules placed at the bottom of business-logic stack 136. In addition, business-logic stack 136 may be populated with sets of business rules based on globalization setting 138. For example, globalization setting 138 for a financial-management application 110 may include a city, state, and country. Globalization setting 138 may be used to retrieve a tax model containing local, state, and federal tax codes for the city, state, and country, respectively. Business rules corresponding to the federal, state, and local tax codes may then be added to business-logic stack 136 in ascending order of priority (e.g., from bottom to top).
After business-logic stack 136 is created, internationalization apparatus 106 may select user-interface components for use in application 110 based on the order of business rules in business-logic stack 136. Continuing with the above example, a user-interface component for calculating sales tax may be obtained by attempting to find a variant of the user-interface component associated with the local tax code, then the state tax code, and finally, the federal tax code. Each variant may be customized according to the corresponding set of business rules. As a result, the variant may be more relevant to use of application 110 by the user than a generic and/or basic version of the user-interface component.
Consequently, internationalization apparatus 106 may obtain a user-interface component for use in application 110 as an available variant of the user-interface component associated with the set of business rules that is as close to the top of business-logic stack 136 as possible. Alternatively, if no variants are available with any of the sets of business rules in business-logic stack 136, internationalization apparatus 106 may obtain a basic version of the user-interface component for use in application 110. Selection of user-interface components and content for user-interface components of applications is described in further detail below with respect to
By decoupling user-interface components from languages and business rules, the system of
Finally, the system of
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the system of
Second, language stack 134 and business-logic stack 136 may be created using a number of techniques. For example, globalization framework 102 may prioritize languages in language stack 134 and/or sets of business rules in business-logic stack 136 based on ordered lists provided by the user, the user's current and/or previous locations, and/or the user's use of other languages with other features (e.g., phone calls, email, etc.) and/or applications on electronic device 100.
Variant 204 may also be selected based on language stack 134, which contains an ordered set of preferred languages (e.g., language 1 216, language m 218) for a user of application 110. For example, language stack 134 may be used to refine variant 204 into a custom layout for displaying content 206 in a specific language in user-interface component 202.
In one or more embodiments, variants of user-interface component 202 in user-interface repository 120 may be based on both language and region. For example, user-interface component 202 may include variants that are both language- and region-specific if user-interface component 202 includes a postal address. As a result, address formats for four countries and two language-specific custom layouts may result in the inclusion of eight variants of user-interface component 202 in user-interface repository 120.
After variant 204 is selected, content 206 for user-interface component 202 may be obtained based on the order of languages in language stack 134. For example, content 206 may be selected as available content for user-interface component 202 from content repository 126 that is associated with the highest possible language in language stack 134. Consequently, content 206 may be customized to a particular set of business rules, a specific language, and/or a language-based layout associated with the set of business rules.
The selection of variant 204 and/or content 206 may be illustrated with the following example. Language stack 134 may include the following languages from top to bottom:
1. language from locale setting of electronic device 100;
2. default language from globalization setting of application 110; and
3. English.
Business-logic stack 136 may specify the use of business rules associated with a tax model of a country from the globalization setting. In addition, the language from the locale setting may be set to Spanish, and the globalization setting may include a country of Canada and a language of French-Canada.
User-interface repository 120 may include a basic version of a user-interface component named “LineItemTaxCell,” as well as business-rule-specific variants named “LineItemTaxCellTAX,” “LineItemTaxCellVAT,” and “LineItemTaxCellGST.” The basic version and business-rule-specific variants may be placed in a “Resources” folder that represents variants of user-interface components that lack language-specific custom layouts.
User-interface repository 120 may also include a folder for Spanish-specific localizations and customizations, which also includes a variant named “LineItemTaxCellVAT.” The folder may also include the following set of strings corresponding to content 206 in Spanish for user-interface component 202, with the string selected for inclusion in user-interface component 202 shown in bold:
In other words, the selected string may map to the Spanish-specific variant of “LineItemTaxCellVAT” instead of other, non-language-specific variants from the “Resources” folder.
Alternatively, the language from the locale setting may be Russian, and the globalization setting may have a country of United Kingdom (Great Britain) and a language of English-GB. If the Russian language is not supported by application 110, content 206 for user-interface component 202 may fall back to custom layouts and/or strings for English-GB.
Initially, a set of user-interface components is obtained based on a globalization setting for the application (operation 302). The globalization setting may be associated with a locale, an organization, and/or a category. In addition, the globalization setting may be associated with a business-logic stack that is used to obtain the user-interface components for use in the application, as described in further detail below with respect to
Next, a language stack containing an ordered set of preferred languages for a user of the application is obtained (operation 304). The language stack may be created by including a default language at a bottom of the language stack and adding one or more languages to the language stack based on a locale setting associated with the electronic device and/or the globalization setting. Content may be available in the default language for all user-interface components in the application, while content may be available in other languages for some or all user-interface components in the application.
A user-interface component is obtained from the set of user-interface components (operation 306), and content for the user-interface component is obtained based on the order of languages in the language stack (operation 308). In particular, an attempt to obtain content for the user-interface component in a first language in the ordered set may be made. If the content is available in the first language, the content is used with the user-interface component. If the content is not available, an attempt to obtain the content in a second language following the first language in the ordered set is made. Attempts to retrieve available content for the user-interface component may continue until available content in a non-default language in the language stack is found or the default language is reached in the language stack.
The content is then included in the user-interface component during use of the application on an electronic device by the user (operation 310). For example, the content may be “injected” into the user-interface component during display of the user-interface component in the application.
Selection of content may proceed with remaining user-interface components (operation 312) in the set. If content has not been obtained for all user-interface components to be used in the application, the content is obtained for each user-interface component based on the order of languages in the language stack (operations 306-308) and included in the user-interface component during use of the application (operation 310). Such language-based selection and use of content may continue until content has been obtained for all user-interface components to be used in the application.
First, a business-logic stack of one or more sets of business rules associated with the globalization setting is obtained (operation 402). The sets of business rules in the business-logic stack may be based on a locale, organization, and/or category associated with the globalization setting.
Next, the user-interface component is obtained based on an order of the sets of business rules in the business-logic stack. In particular, an attempt to obtain a variant of the user-interface component associated with a set of business rules in the business-logic stack is made (operation 404). The variant may also be associated with a language from a language stack for the application. For example, the variant may include a custom layout for a language and/or region, which may be obtained from the globalization setting and/or a locale setting for an electronic device on which the application executes.
The user-interface component may then be obtained based on the availability of the variant (operation 406). If the variant is available, the variant is included in a set of user-interface components (operation 412) to be used in the application. If the variant is not available, variants associated with remaining sets of business rules in the business-logic stack (operation 408) may be used.
If additional sets of business rules remain in the business-logic stack, an attempt to obtain a variant of the user-interface component associated with the next-lowest set of business rules in the business-logic stack is made (operation 404). The availability of the variant (operation 406) may result in the inclusion of the variant in the set of user-interface components (operation 412) or a continuation of the search for an available variant with remaining sets of business rules in the business-logic stack (operations 408 and 404). If no sets of business rules remain in the business-logic stack (e.g., if the bottom of the business-logic stack is reached), the basic version of the user-interface component is included in the set of user-interface components (operation 410). The basic version may lack any customizations that are related to business rules in the business-logic stack or languages in the language stack.
Computer system 500 may include functionality to execute various components of the present embodiments. In particular, computer system 500 may include an operating system (not shown) that coordinates the use of hardware and software resources on computer system 500, as well as one or more applications that perform specialized tasks for the user. To perform tasks for the user, applications may obtain the use of hardware resources on computer system 500 from the operating system, as well as interact with the user through a hardware and/or software framework provided by the operating system.
In one or more embodiments, computer system 500 provides a system for facilitating use of an application. The system may include a language-management apparatus that obtains a language stack containing an ordered set of preferred languages for a user of the application. The system may also include a localization apparatus. For each user-interface component from a set of user-interface components in the application, the localization apparatus may obtain content for the user-interface component based on an order of languages in the language stack and include the content in the user-interface component during use of the application by the user. Finally, the system may include an internationalization apparatus that obtains the set of user-interface components based on a globalization setting for the application.
In addition, one or more components of computer system 500 may be remotely located and connected to the other components over a network. Portions of the present embodiments (e.g., language-management apparatus, localization apparatus, internationalization apparatus, etc.) may also be located on different nodes of a distributed system that implements the embodiments. For example, the present embodiments may be implemented using a cloud computing system that provides localization and internationalization of an application to a set of remote electronic devices on which the application is installed.
The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/722,879, entitled “Dynamically Adaptive Localization Given the Preferred Device Language & Locale and the Country of the User-Selected Company to Determine the Display Language, Tax Model, Currency, and Data Formatting,” by Lance Saleme and Benjamin Lee, filed 6 Nov. 2012, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5721848 | Joseph | Feb 1998 | A |
5819249 | Dohanich | Oct 1998 | A |
5868576 | Maruta | Feb 1999 | A |
5917484 | Mullaney | Jun 1999 | A |
6018730 | Nichols et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6065026 | Cornelia | May 2000 | A |
6138086 | Rose | Oct 2000 | A |
6202052 | Miller | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205418 | Li | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6253193 | Ginter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6339755 | Hetherington | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6623529 | Lakritz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7110952 | Kursh | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7225199 | Green et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7249072 | Nearhood | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249344 | Zeanah | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7257775 | Jivakov | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7603301 | Regan | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7636742 | Olavarrieta et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7693760 | Fiteni et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7761484 | Christensen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7814470 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7823125 | Batabyal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860763 | Quinn et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7904595 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930167 | Young et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7970796 | Narayanan | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8082193 | Seeley et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8209229 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8296720 | Coulthard et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8346537 | Chino | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8402047 | Mangini et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8438006 | Yang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447873 | Joyce | May 2013 | B1 |
8452676 | Talan et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8527307 | Hamilton et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8595710 | Aldahleh et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8650476 | Belle | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8788259 | Buryak | Jul 2014 | B1 |
20010029455 | Chin | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010042080 | Ross | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020064766 | Cozens | May 2002 | A1 |
20020120762 | Cheng | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020177993 | Veditz | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184308 | Levy | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009323 | Adeli | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040899 | Ogilvie | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050936 | Wainwright | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058272 | Maeno | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084401 | Abel | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088617 | Clark | May 2003 | A1 |
20040019540 | William | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019541 | William | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046789 | Inanoria | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059998 | Palmieri | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085570 | Sfaelos | May 2004 | A1 |
20040167768 | Travieso et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050099398 | Garside | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102283 | Anderson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050177358 | Melomed et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197786 | Kataria | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203727 | Heiner | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060080082 | Ravindra | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100858 | McEntee | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117304 | Anastassopoulos et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155618 | Wyle | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206310 | Ravikumar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070021982 | Sun | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041370 | Cleveland | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070192715 | Kataria | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080096486 | Whitten | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090094609 | Burukhin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138255 | Sterling | May 2009 | A1 |
20090327002 | Chapman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017251 | Rawle | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042518 | Handa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045460 | Caler et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058169 | Demant et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063877 | Soroca | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100198579 | Cunnington et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110004897 | Alexander | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016375 | Ramic | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046939 | Balasaygun | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110191246 | Brandstetter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110192895 | Millan Marco | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197285 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214067 | Tanaka | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264440 | Zhou | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264569 | Houseworth et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120017146 | Travieso et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035908 | Lebeau | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036078 | Dean et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120060112 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120191580 | Bhatt | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120239381 | Heidasch | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120278213 | Bristow et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330721 | Volpe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013286 | Rodet | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130124185 | Sarr et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124187 | Qin | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151233 | Gande | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191108 | Anisimovich et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226554 | Dillard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130282365 | Van De Ven | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140006004 | Gundepuneni et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006929 | Swartz | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052434 | Bank | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140129209 | Saleme et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150161114 | Buryak | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161227 | Buryak | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006026636 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sharma et al., “Method and System for Creating Tax Configuration Templates,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/655,313, filed Oct. 18, 2012. |
Goyette et al., “A Content Based Payroll Compliance System,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,202, filed May 30, 2013. |
Naik et al., “Method and System for Providing a Payroll Preparation Platform with User Contribution-Based Plug-Ins,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,202, filed May 30, 2013. |
Intuit “TurboTax/MacInTax for Business Streamlines Tax Preparation for Small Business Owners,” Intuit Press Release, Jan. 6, 1999, 2 pages. http://web.intuit.com/about_intuit/press_releases/1999/01-06_1.html. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140129209 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61722879 | Nov 2012 | US |