The present invention relates to a stack of a plurality of cellulose-containing absorbent towels for a dispenser, the towels being separable upon dispensing. The present invention also relates to a process for manufacturing a stack of a plurality of cellulose-containing towels for a dispenser.
Transportation of tissue paper bundles and similar products, folded or un-folded, includes transportation of substantial amounts of air between the sheets and plies of the products. Typically, densities for common dry crepe and TAD (Through Air Dried) in folded products range up to around 0.19 g/cm3 and 0.15 g/cm3 respectively.
For folded products, typical high end data for density is in the ranges:
It has been a long-felt need to reduce the bulk of stacks of cellulose-containing hand towels. Some attempts have been made to compress the stack of hand towels and then wrap them with an enclosure wrap to keep them in somewhat compressed state during transportation and storage. This is known from for instance EP 1 860 033 A1.
By heavy compression of the products before packing them in transport units on pallets, substantial cost saves are made due to the increased density and reduced pack dimensions and the fit of more products per pallet and truck. The object with the present disclosure is to significantly reduce the volume of stacked absorbent towels without sacrificing dispensing performance and without sacrificing performance with regards to the function of the towels, such as good absorption and wet strength. If this object is fulfilled one can reduce dispenser size with preserved capacity and/or increase capacity of today's system. There is also logistics and environmental gains in reducing stack height.
The present disclosure thus relates to a stack of a plurality of cellulose-containing absorbent towels for a dispenser characterized in that the stack has a high density dependent on choice of material. The towels (or tissue) are separable one by one from the stack upon dispensing. Here, “separable” means that the towels can be removed one by one from the stack by the hands of a user. Hence, the towels of the compressed stack should be possible to separate from each other at dispensing, so that a user will not get a clump or bunch of towels when he tries to pull one. Hence, the sheets must be loose or easily loosened from each other to slide off from the rest of the stack. Here, “cellulose-containing” refers to a material comprising cellulose in different amount. If the amount of cellulose is above 50% then the material is referred to as cellulose based.
According to one embodiment of the invention the stack comprises at least 50 of towels.
According to an embodiment of the invention the material choice gives the following data:
The method Wet Creped or Wet Pressed is known from, e.g. WO02/40774.
The non-compressing de-watering technology may be TAD (Thru-Air-Dried), UCTAD (Uncreped-Through-Air-Dried) or ATMOS (Advanced-Tissue-Molding-System:). The methods are known from prior art, for example TAD is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,547; and ATMOS from U.S. Pat. No. 7,744,726, U.S. Pat. No. 7,550,061 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,709; and UCTAD from EP 1156925 and WO 02/40774.
According to one example, the towels are interfolded for dispensing purposes. Here, interfolded means that the towels are folded such that they “hook” into each other for allowing one towel to be partly dispensed or ready to be dispensed when the towel before is being dispensed.
The present disclosure includes a process for manufacturing a stack of a plurality of cellulose-containing towels for a dispenser, wherein the stack is conditioned to a predetermined moisture level and then compressed to the above described densities dependent on choice of material. The method comprises the step of applying a predetermined pressure for a predetermined time, the pressure and time being dependent on material in the towel and the moisture level of the material and that the compressed stack of towels should be separable upon dispensing.
The stack may be compressed from a non-compressed state or a partly compressed state.
According to one example of the process the moisture level should not exceed 5%.
According to an embodiment of the process the predetermined pressure should not exceed P 200 bar or 200×105 Pa (N/m2).
Method for determining stack/bundle density:
Density is defined as weight per volume and reported in kg/m3.
The stack is measured as received i.e. if it has a wrap of some kind that wrap is left on the bundle and is included in the result.
The bundle is conditioned in standard condition climate (23° C./50% RH) for at least 24 h.
Weight is measured to the nearest 0.1 g with a suitable calibrated scale.
The bundle is considered to have essentially planar surfaces that constitute the outer boundaries of its volume.
Relative position and size of these surfaces are determined by means of plates and sliding caliper as described below:
The bundle is positioned between two planar plates of a suitably rigid material to prevent bending (square steel plates 200×300 mm and 8 mm thick has been used)
The plates are fixed on guidance rods so they remain parallel (with an accuracy of +/−1 mm) and the upper plate can move along these guides.
The bundle is placed between the plates and the upper plate rests on the bundle so its weight rests on the stack.
The steel plate described above has a weight of approximately 4 kg (corresponding to a force of 40 N) that will on the most common stacks exert a pressure of approximately 2 KPa (+/−0.5 kPa). Should the pressure be outside this range, the load of the plates should be adjusted accordingly.
The distance between the plates (that defines the height of the stack) is determined with sliding caliper or other suitable device to an accuracy of 1%.
The outer dimensions of the stack in the two other principal directions (width and length) are determined also by sliding caliper while the stack is in the fixture as described above.
Measurement of length and width is made on at least five different positions equally distributed along the height of the stack and with essentially no compression of the stack from the sliding caliper.
The volume is defined as the volume of a rectangular parallelepiped that circumscribes the stack—determined with sliding caliper as described above—i.e. height×length×width.
A suitable sliding caliper is supplied by Mitutoyo with art no 552-150-10 which can be supplied with 200 mm measurement legs.
End of method.
The invention also relates to a transport package comprising a plurality of refill stacks of cellulose-containing absorbent towels for a dispenser. The towels are separable upon dispensing, and the transport package is arranged to be fitted on a rectangular pallet with a bottom area of 1200 mm×800 mm, and within a volume defined by the bottom area and the height of the transport package. The weight of the transport package divided with the volume of the transport package gives a transport package density. The transport density depends on material in the following manner:
Embodiments of the invention will in the following be described with reference to drawings wherein:
Hence, stacks 2 of the type as shown in
The stacks 2 are compressed under conditions such that the stacks can be arranged and used in dispensers without sacrificing dispensing performance and without sacrificing performance with regards to the function of the towels, such as good absorption and wet strength.
The stack is according to an embodiment of the invention compressed to a predetermined density dependent on choice of material. Said density is calculated by measuring the weight and the volume of the stack.
The stack may consist of a connected web arranged in zigzag with the individual towels along the web being separated and separable upon dispensing. This embodiment is not shown in the drawings.
The stack may also be formed from a continuous web which is provided with perforations between each individual towel, whereby individual towels can be withdrawn from the dispenser by tearing along the perforations.
Alternatively the stack may be formed from a continuous web without perforations. Instead the dispenser is provided with a tear edge, such as a toothed edge, along with which the web can be cut by a user for producing separate towels.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the towels or tissues arranged as described above are separable one by one upon dispensing.
According to an embodiment of the invention the material choice gives the following data:
In
The stack 2 is conditioned to a predetermined moisture level and then compressed to a density of at least 0.31 g/cm3. The method comprises the step of applying a predetermined pressure for a predetermined time. The pressure and time being dependent on material in the towel 3 and the moisture level of the material. One important parameter is that the compressed stack of towels should be separable upon dispensing.
Alternatively, not shown, the top belt can be horizontal and the bottom belt arranged in inclination or both belts could be arranged in inclination.
In
Alternatively, not shown, the upper series of rolls can be horizontal and the lower series arranged in inclination or both series can be arranged in inclination.
In
In
In
In
It should be noted that the refill stacks refer to stacks or bundles as described in connection to
The present invention is not restricted to the above described embodiments. A lot of alternative and modifications are possible within the scope of the following claims.
It should be understood from the description that the term “towel” includes different types of cellulose-containing materials such as for instance tissue.
An alternative method of compacting stacks of towels is to use vacuum or any other means of applying pressure on the stacks.
All means of applying pressure/compressing the stacks may be combined with pre-calendaring, and may be performed in several steps.
All means of applying pressure/compressing the stacks may be combined with adjusting moisture to the product in different levels, before after or during compression.
The compression can be performed step by step, linear or non-linear.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2010/051467 | 12/22/2010 | WO | 00 | 6/21/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/087211 | 6/28/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2741361 | Klein | Apr 1956 | A |
2960023 | Greiner et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
3120172 | Enloe | Feb 1964 | A |
3172563 | Harwood | Mar 1965 | A |
3172564 | Peterson | Mar 1965 | A |
3291678 | Enloe et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3432936 | Greenhalgh | Mar 1969 | A |
3612264 | Trunick | Oct 1971 | A |
RE28459 | Cole | Jul 1975 | E |
4417670 | Booher | Nov 1983 | A |
5143249 | Saint Criq et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5265758 | Saint Criq et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5417912 | Merry | May 1995 | A |
5535887 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540354 | Annand | Jul 1996 | A |
5656134 | Marinack | Aug 1997 | A |
5851353 | Fiscus | Dec 1998 | A |
5853547 | Ahrens et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6077590 | Archer | Jun 2000 | A |
6187139 | Edwards | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6273996 | Hollenberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284083 | Dahlquist | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6432267 | Watson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447640 | Watson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6602575 | Lefevre Du Grosriez et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
7294230 | Flugge-Berendes | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7527709 | Lippi Alves Fernandes et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7550061 | Walkenhaus et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7744726 | Scherb et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7807022 | Hermans | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8205748 | Long et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8389092 | Andersson | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8857611 | Thorburn et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20020074100 | Yeh | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050058807 | Hochtritt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050103434 | Andersson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060086472 | Hermans | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070107863 | Edwards | May 2007 | A1 |
20080248239 | Pomeroy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100078444 | Shannon | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100243504 | Long et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110095042 | Bandoh | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120072018 | Norlund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120156447 | Hein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130269893 | Nelvig et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140037701 | Mellin et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140044917 | Formon et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140057069 | Huang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140106117 | Hochtritt et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135192 | Andersson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140291186 | Andersson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140361033 | Andersson | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101646373 | Feb 2010 | CN |
1 860 033 | Nov 2007 | EP |
958496 | May 1964 | GB |
1011061 | Nov 1965 | GB |
2001286414 | Oct 2001 | JP |
310863 | May 1969 | SE |
WO 0040405 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0240774 | May 2002 | WO |
2010 008331 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) issued on Sep. 12, 2011, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2010/051467. |
Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) issued on Sep. 12, 2011, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2010/051467. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (PCT/IPEA/409) Issued on Feb. 8, 2013, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Preliminary Examining Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2010/051467. |
Office Action issued by the Chinese Patent Office on Apr. 23, 2015 in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201080070843.9. (8 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 22, 2016, issued by the European Patent Office in corresponding European Application No. EP 108610951 (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130269893 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |