This invention relates generally to bedding, and more particularly to a nestably stackable bedding foundation.
Bedding foundations or so-called box spring assemblies generally include spaced border wires between which coil or bent wire spring modules are located. As thus manufactured, these box spring assemblies are bulky and shipping them to the manufacturer for application of padding and covering thereto is costly because of space requirements. To reduce the space requirements, it is customary to compress the assemblies to reduce their individual thicknesses and to tie them in their compressed state. This involves using presses and ties which are expensive, and the extra operations of pressing and tying the assemblies also adds to their manufacturing cost. At the delivery end, the manufacturer must cut and discard the ties before applying the covering. These additional material and handling expenses increase the end cost of box spring assemblies.
Box spring assemblies by their very nature are intended to provide a stable support foundation for mattresses or other bedding placed on top thereof. Toward that end, the spring modules used in the box spring assemblies should be securely and firmly mounted in the assembly to avoid any wobble or shifting during use.
In some cases, bedding systems become unevenly depressed, often due to uneven loading. It is well recognized that the middle regions of a bedding system support a greater amount of the user's weight focused in the torso regions. Users commonly do not rotate or flip bedding systems as is often recommended to avoid uneven wear. Alternatively, bedding systems desirably provide differing support characteristics or firmness to different areas or regions of the bed to provide extended wear, durability and/or comfort to the user.
Therefore, a bedding foundation assembly that can be stacked for shipping without having to compress and tie the assembly would be a significant improvement.
Additionally, a bedding foundation assembly which is relatively simple to manufacture, and which may substitute for a traditional box spring assembly having coil spring modules is also desirable.
Moreover, such a bedding foundation must provide a reliable and stable support surface for mattresses and other bedding products, preferably one which can be easily tailored with specific regions or zones of varying firmness.
This invention provides a solution to these and other problems in the art. In one embodiment, this invention is a nestably stackable bedding foundation assembly for use in place of the traditional box spring assembly. This bedding foundation assembly includes a rectangular border wire and transversely-spaced, parallel, and longitudinally-extending support wires parallel to the border wire sides and with ends connected to the border wire ends. These support wires are generally corrugated along their lengths, having peaks and valleys with the peaks being generally coplanar with the plane defined by the border wire and the valleys being displaced beneath and intermediate of the peaks. Longitudinally-spaced, parallel and transversely-extending upper connector wires are parallel to the border wire ends and connected along their lengths to the peaks of the support wires. Longitudinally-spaced, parallel, and transversely-extending lower connector wires are parallel to the border wire ends and may be connected to the valleys of the support wires in certain embodiments of this invention.
The longitudinal voids between the peaks of the support wires are of a greater dimension than the valleys of the support wires. This configuration enables one bedding foundation assembly of this invention to be nestedly stacked atop a second assembly since the support wire valleys of the first assembly fit into the voids between the peaks of the support wires of the second assembly. Such a nested and stacked arrangement results in a total height dimension which is less than the sum of the individual assembly height dimensions.
The valleys of the support wires of this invention are uniquely configured to provide specific advantages to the bedding foundation. In one embodiment, selected valleys of the support wires are twisted or oriented relative to the remainder of the support wire. Selected support wire valleys are twisted, possibly 45° or 90° relative to the adjacent portions of the support wires to provide a more stable and substantial mounting and attachment of the support wire valley to a base frame. The twisted orientation of the spring wire valleys can be varied throughout the foundation unit to provide differing firmness and other characteristics to the associated regions or zones of the unit.
One advantage of this invention is that it enables relatively inexpensive bedding foundation wire cores to be tightly nested, compacted and shipped in a minimum of space to an assembly destination, thereby reducing the ultimate cost of the unit to the assembler.
Another advantage of this invention is that bedding foundation assemblies may be rapidly loaded by a manufacturer for transportation to the destination of assembly without the need for compressing and tying the assemblies together.
Yet another advantage of this invention is avoiding the need for costly presses and ties necessary to compress a conventional box spring assembly for transportation.
A further advantage of this invention is that bedding foundation assemblies may be rapidly unloaded without the time consuming and labor intensive tasks of clipping and discarding the tie wires used to hold conventional box spring assemblies in a compressed state.
A still further advantage is to provide such a foundation assembly that is both stable and secure when in use to support a mattress or the like and provide different firmness regions or zones to the assembly.
The objectives and features of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring first to
The nestably stackable assembly 16 includes a rectangular steel border wire 22 having two parallel sides 24, 24 and two parallel ends 26, 26. The parallel sides 24, 24 are longer than the parallel ends 26, 26. Transversely-spaced, parallel, and longitudinally-extending steel support wires 28 are parallel to the border wire sides 24, 24 and have ends 30 which are crimped around the ends 26, 26 of the border wire 22. These support wires 28 are formed so as to be generally corrugatedly-shaped along their lengths, having peaks 32 and valleys 34. These peaks 32 and valleys 34 are flattened at their respective distal portions 36 and 38, respectively. The adjacent distal portions 36, 38 are joined together by connecting portions 39 of the support wire 28. According to various embodiments of this invention, these valleys 38 are twisted relative to the plane defined by the peaks 36 being vertically spaced beneath and intermediate of the flattened peaks 36.
Longitudinally-spaced, parallel, and transversely-extending steel upper connector wires 40 extend parallel to the border wire ends 26, 26 and have ends 42 which are crimped around the border wire sides 24, 24. These upper connector wires 40 are welded intermediate of their ends 42, 42 along their lengths at 44 to the flattened peaks 36 of the support wires 28.
Longitudinally-spaced, parallel, and transversely-extending steel lower connector wires 46 extend along the selected slats 14 and parallel to the border wire ends 26, 26 in some embodiments (see
The support wires 28 have flattened distal peak portions 36 and flattened distal valley portions 38, with the support wire ends 30 being crimped around the border wire 22. In this embodiment, three upper connector wires 40 per flattened distal peak portion 36 are illustrated. The distal valley portions 38 of the support wires 28 may be stapled or otherwise attached to the transverse slats 14 which are in turn affixed to the base frame 12.
If desired, additional steel end wires (not shown) may be added either before or after the stackable assembly 16 has reached its final assembly destination. These end wires have spaced ends which are crimped around the border wire 22 and the endmost upper connector wire 40, respectively. These end wires provide additional stiffness to the stackable assembly 16 in an edge most location of the ends of the assembly 16 so as to prevent the end border wires from deflecting and being permanently distorted when a person sits on the end of a bed of which the foundation forms a part. Such steel end wires are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,361,434 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Referring again to
The spring assembly 16 of a bedding foundation 10 is generally manufactured by a supplier, who then ships it to an assembler. The assembler adds to the assembly the wooden base 12, slats 14, padding 18, and upholstery 20 to make a completed product.
This invention facilitates shipment of the metal core or stackable assembly 16 by a supplier to the assembler. With reference to
One advantage of the spring assembly 16 and associated bedding foundation 10 according to this invention is that the distal valley portions 38 of the support wires 28 are uniquely configured to provide added stability to the bedding foundation 10. In the embodiment of the bedding foundation 10 and associated spring assembly 16 shown in
Moreover, a variety of different support wire shapes and configurations can be utilized with this invention. The support wires 28 shown in the foundation unit 10 of
In another alternative embodiment of the foundation unit 10 of this invention as shown in
A still further alternative embodiment of the foundation unit 10 is shown in
In a still further alternative embodiment shown in
A further alternative embodiment of the foundation unit 10 is shown in
Another alternative embodiment of the foundation unit 10 according to the invention is shown in
A further alternative embodiment of the foundation unit 10 according to this invention is shown in
A still further alternative embodiment of the foundation unit 10 according to this invention is shown in
One advantage of the variety of embodiments possible with the foundation unit 10 according to this invention is the ability to customize the support characteristics of the foundation unit 10. Moreover, the foundation unit 10 may include zones of differing degrees of support and firmness due to the differing orientations of the distal valley portions 38 as is readily apparent from the embodiment shown in
One of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the alternative embodiments of the foundation unit 10 shown herein are exemplary only of a wide variety of alternative configurations that are readily possible within the scope of this invention.
From the above disclosure of the general principles of the present invention and the preceding detailed description of at least one preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will readily comprehend the various modifications to which this invention is susceptible. Therefore, we desire to be limited only by the scope of the following claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
136473 | Ward | Mar 1873 | A |
197405 | Read | Nov 1877 | A |
727265 | Beall | May 1903 | A |
2415765 | Schmidt | Feb 1947 | A |
2979739 | Krakauer | Apr 1961 | A |
3561021 | Slominski | Feb 1971 | A |
3722013 | Surletta | Mar 1973 | A |
3725965 | Smith et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3852838 | Slominski et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3953903 | Lawrence et al. | May 1976 | A |
3990121 | Whitaker | Nov 1976 | A |
4000531 | Inman | Jan 1977 | A |
4012802 | Hutchinson et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4069525 | Valoff | Jan 1978 | A |
4112528 | Higgins | Sep 1978 | A |
4120058 | Kitchen et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4377279 | Schulz, Jr. et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4488712 | Higgins | Dec 1984 | A |
4555097 | Hiatt | Nov 1985 | A |
4639957 | Wells et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4657231 | Surletta | Apr 1987 | A |
4739977 | Dabney | Apr 1988 | A |
4771995 | Wells et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4891853 | Dabney | Jan 1990 | A |
4903949 | Schulz, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
4960267 | Scott | Oct 1990 | A |
5052064 | Hagemeister et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5104099 | Long | Apr 1992 | A |
5165125 | Callaway | Nov 1992 | A |
5176367 | Rodgers et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178372 | Rodgers et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5246210 | Dabney et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5332202 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5346188 | Rodgers et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5346190 | Dabney | Sep 1994 | A |
5361434 | Hagemeister et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370374 | Rodgers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5395097 | Dabney et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401007 | Dabney et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414874 | Wagner et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426799 | Ottiger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5435023 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5588165 | Fromme | Dec 1996 | A |
5622357 | Schulz, Jr. et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5652986 | Wells | Aug 1997 | A |
5704595 | Kitchen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720471 | Constantinescu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5803440 | Wells | Sep 1998 | A |
5927696 | Hagemeister | Jul 1999 | A |
5967499 | McCraw et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6108834 | Mauro et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134729 | Quintile et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149143 | Richmond et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6406009 | Constantinescu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6484339 | Mossbeck et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6578213 | Dabney | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6651276 | McCraw et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060156470 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |