1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for packaging particulate material.
2. Description of the Related Art
Articles can be contained and transported in flexible containers such as bags. It can be desirable to limit the movement of individual articles in the flexible container with respect to one another to reduce the likelihood that articles will be damaged and to increase the likelihood that the container will maintain a relatively rigid shape. Several different methods have been proposed to limit the movement of individual articles in the flexible container with respect to one another. For example, it is known to fill a flexible container and shrink-wrap the filled container. It is known to draw air from the flexible container to define a vacuum, wherein the vacuum seal can substantially limit the movement of articles in the container with respect to one another. It also is known to compress a filled, flexible container with pressurized air to urge air from the flexible container and substantially limit movement of articles in the container with respect to one another.
The invention provides a stackable bulk transport container. The stackable bulk transport container includes a first bulk container that includes a flexible container filled with particulate material and wrapped in stretch wrap. The flexible container of the first bulk container is wrapped such that the stretch wrap is applied substantially at the fill level as the fill level rises. The stackable bulk transport container also includes a planar member positioned on the first bulk container. The planar member defines a substantially planar surface that engages the first bulk container. The stackable bulk transport container also includes a second bulk container positioned on the planar member. When the second bulk container is positioned on the planar member, the planar member flattens and expands the top portion of the first bulk container to enhance the stability of the stackable bulk transport container.
Other embodiments of the present invention and applications for the exemplary embodiment of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art when the following description of the best mode contemplated for practicing the invention is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
A plurality of different embodiments of the invention are shown in the Figures of the application. Similar features are shown in the various embodiments of the invention. Similar features have been numbered with a common reference numeral and have been differentiated by an alphabetic designation. Also, to enhance consistency, features in any particular drawing share the same alphabetic designation even if the feature is shown in less than all embodiments. Similar features are structured similarly, operate similarly, and/or have the same function unless otherwise indicated by the drawings or this specification. Furthermore, particular features of one embodiment can replace corresponding features in another embodiment unless otherwise indicated by the drawings or this specification.
This application incorporates U.S. Pat. No. 6,494,324 by reference. The '324 patent discloses transportable container and a method for forming the container. The present application discloses a method of stacking two containers formed by the method disclosed in the '324 patent to form the stackable bulk transport container. Also, the present application discloses variations to the method disclosed in the '324 patent to enhance stacking.
The first bulk container 14 is shown in
The process moves from step 12 to step 16 and a substantially planar member 18 is positioned on top of the first bulk container 14. The substantially planar member 18 defines a substantially planar surface facing the first bulk container 14. In the exemplary embodiment of the invention shown in
The substantially planar member 18 can be wrapped with the flexible container of the first bulk container 14 at the end of formation of the first bulk container 14. Alternatively, the substantially planar member 18 can be wrapped with the first bulk container 14.
The process moves from step 16 to step 20 and a second bulk container 22 is formed and positioned on the substantially planar member 18. The second bulk container 22 is formed according to the methods disclosed in the '324 patent. However, the second bulk container 22 can be formed according to the variations to the '324 patent set forth above, or other variations. The first and second bulk containers 14, 22 can be similarly formed to simplify and make consistent forming operations. The weight of the second bulk container 22 compresses the first bulk container 14 such that at least the top portion of the first bulk container 14, such as a truncated-conical top, is flattened.
The particulate material at the top portion of the first bulk container 14 moves radially outwardly and downwardly in response to positioning of the second bulk container 22 until forces are balanced. For example, the weight of the second bulk container 22 is balanced by other forces acting on the particulate material at the top portion of the first bulk container 14. For example, hoop forces applied by the stretch wrap squeeze the particulate material such that individual particles are gentled urged together to form a lattice structure within the flexible container. Also, frictional forces are generated between particles and resist radially outward movement and downward movement.
The properties of the particulate material and the force applied with the stretch wrap can be manipulated to enhance the stability of the stacked first and second bulk containers 14, 22. Generally, the strength of the hoop forces applied by the stretch wrap does not prevent the particulate material from moving downward and radially outward when the second bulk container 22 is initially positioned.
The static, or equilibrium, forces associated with the top of the first bulk container 14 include the weight of the second bulk container 22, the hoop forces generated by the stretch wrap, and frictional forces being generated between the individual particles of the particulate material. After the second bulk container 22 has stabilized on the first bulk container 14, any new force introduced to the system tending to move the second bulk container 22 relative to the first bulk container 14 is met with a broad area of resistance such that relatively small motion is met with a relatively large increase in force resisting movement.
The strength of the hoop forces can be selected in view of the frictional characteristics of the particulate material. For example, if the friction characteristics of the particulate matter of the first bulk container 14 are relatively low, relatively higher hoop forces can be generated by the stretch wrap. Similarly, if the friction characteristics of the particulate matter of the first bulk container 14 are relatively high, relatively lower hoop forces can be generated by the stretch wrap.
In alternative embodiments of the invention, the methods disclosed in the '324 patent can be modified to form the first bulk container 14 in an hourglass or hourglass-like shape, as shown in
After step 20, the stacked first and second bulk containers 14, 22 may or may not be wrapped together. The process ends at step 24. In one example of the exemplary embodiment of the invention, a first bulk container 14 stood seventy-one inches tall before stacking and sixty-eight inches tall after stacking. The circumference of the first bulk container 14 increased by eight inches. The increase in circumference would result in an increase in the hoop force generated by the stretch wrap, the increase in hoop force corresponding to the weight of the second bulk container 22.
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and do come within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of legal protection afforded this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/654,436 for a STACKABLE BULK TRANSPORT CONTAINER, filed on Feb. 18, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2765816 | Carter | Oct 1956 | A |
3374599 | Sanders | Mar 1968 | A |
3570749 | Sato et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3778962 | James | Dec 1973 | A |
3785410 | Carter | Jan 1974 | A |
3906591 | Boiardi | Sep 1975 | A |
3928940 | Fagniart | Dec 1975 | A |
3943988 | Consorti | Mar 1976 | A |
3949536 | Chevalier | Apr 1976 | A |
3968626 | Hobbs | Jul 1976 | A |
4074507 | Ruf et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4101292 | Hogan, II | Jul 1978 | A |
4113146 | Williamson | Sep 1978 | A |
4136501 | Connolly | Jan 1979 | A |
4219054 | Carter et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4223061 | Michaels | Sep 1980 | A |
4249839 | Vance | Feb 1981 | A |
4253507 | Williamson | Mar 1981 | A |
4299076 | Humphrey | Nov 1981 | A |
4339040 | Peil et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4360996 | Rutter | Nov 1982 | A |
4409776 | Usui | Oct 1983 | A |
4500001 | Daniels | Feb 1985 | A |
4546593 | Lasscock | Oct 1985 | A |
4648432 | Mechalas | Mar 1987 | A |
4671043 | Forni et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4706441 | Chervalier | Nov 1987 | A |
4734292 | Gerardus Van Boxtel | Mar 1988 | A |
4753060 | Furukawa | Jun 1988 | A |
4781475 | LaFleur | Nov 1988 | A |
5016761 | Stoddard et al. | May 1991 | A |
5025925 | Wiklund | Jun 1991 | A |
5353936 | Dockstader et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354569 | Brown et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5501254 | Bjorklund | Mar 1996 | A |
5507859 | Kaiser | Apr 1996 | A |
5544472 | Koskinen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566530 | Johnstone et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5567048 | Hammonds | Oct 1996 | A |
5573044 | Mechalas | Nov 1996 | A |
5598684 | Aarts | Feb 1997 | A |
5678387 | Aarts | Oct 1997 | A |
5687551 | Mustain et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5787945 | Riemersma | Aug 1998 | A |
5809744 | Villines et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5887409 | Leal Pereira Da Silva | Mar 1999 | A |
5953888 | Martin-Cocher et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967579 | Hebert | Oct 1999 | A |
6012266 | Koskinen et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6131766 | King et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138723 | Wagner | Oct 2000 | A |
6164453 | Perkins | Dec 2000 | A |
6205750 | Koskinen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6299354 | Nickell et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6324818 | Morness et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343459 | Seaward et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6415927 | Stone et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6494324 | Ours et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6560947 | Kasel | May 2003 | B2 |
6575629 | Perkins | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594970 | Hyne et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20010008567 | Burkhardt | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020191869 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0122864 | Oct 1984 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060185327 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60654436 | Feb 2005 | US |