The present invention relates in general to a stackable transport container according to the preamble to Claim 1. In particular, the present invention relates to a stackable transport container which has been designed, when filled with products in a full condition, to be stacked with other transport containers on top of each other, or, when in an empty condition to be placed together with other transport containers inside one another.
Transport containers have already been known for a long time, for the transport of bread and similar foods from a large bakery to the individual shops, which are therefore also known as bread baskets.
These transport containers have a bottom and a front wall, a rear wall and two opposite side walls, which extend upwards from the bottom at a right angle, to form a receptacle open towards the top. The upper edges of the side walls are formed with a kind of rail that is shaped so that it can engage with projections that are formed at the periphery of the underside of the container bottom of a transport container placed on top of it, if two of these transport containers are stacked on top of one another. In this way, two transport containers stacked on top of one another cannot be displaced relative to one another, as the projections on the underside of the container bottom of the upper transport container engage with the rail on the upper edge of the side walls of the lower transport container. These transport containers are generally used for the delivery of products. The filled containers being stacked on top of each other to form stacks, and then transported for example from a large bakery to the individual shops. The empty transport containers are then later transported back to the large bakery.
The disadvantage of these known transport containers is that, in their empty condition they cannot be placed one inside another to save space, which means that the transport volume of the filled transport containers (filled volume) is the same as the transport volume of the empty transport containers (empty volume).
To overcome this disadvantage, transport containers have been developed that can be both stacked on top of one another and placed inside one another. Transport containers of this type when in a full condition filled with products can be stacked on top of one another, generally with the lower surface of the bottom of an upper transport container resting on the upper edge of the side walls of a lower transport container. This creates a relatively large transport volume (filled volume) for each of the transport containers, which approximately corresponds to the product of the bottom surface and the height of the side walls of such a transport container. Should these transport containers be transported in an empty condition, it is naturally desirable that the transport volume of the empty transport containers (empty volume) should be kept as low as possible. For this reason the side walls of these known transport containers are inclined slightly outwards, in order to enable the empty transport containers to be placed inside one another to save space. In this way a filled volume:empty volume ratio of approximately 2:1 can be achieved.
It is clear that these known transport containers must be constructed so as to be able to be stacked on top of one another and placed inside each other. Various suggestions for this have already been made in the state of the art.
From EP 0 250 674 for example, transport containers are known, that can be stacked on top of one another or placed inside each other at several levels. Such a transport container has a bottom, and side walls sloping upwards from the peripheral edges of the bottom, and at right angles to these, end walls sloping upwards from the peripheral edges of the bottom to form a receptacle open towards the top. On the inner surface of the first side wall, there are two first rows, separated by a certain distance from each other, formed by essentially parallel grooves running at an angle to the vertical, and on the inner surface of the second side wall opposite, there are two second rows separated by a certain distance from each other, formed by essentially parallel grooves running at an angle to the vertical, which essentially correspond to the first two rows that are formed on the inner surface of the first side wall. The individual grooves of each of these four rows have increasingly lower closed ends, so that within each of the four rows, grooves of differing lengths are formed. From the outer surface of the first side wall two first elongated ribs extend outwards, and from the outer surface of the second side wall opposite two second elongated ribs extend outwards, the two first ribs and the two second ribs being formed in such a way, and running at the same angle to the vertical as the grooves, so that the ribs of an upper transport container can in each case engage into an associated groove of the first two rows of grooves, or the second two rows of grooves of a second similar-type transport container placed underneath, so that different stacking heights are possible for stacking on top of one other or placing inside each other.
In these transport containers the distances between the grooves are the same as the distances between the corresponding ribs, which is why the ribs of an upper transport container can easily engage with the corresponding grooves of a lower transport container, if both transport containers are in a horizontal alignment.
The disadvantage of these transport containers is that it is relatively difficult to bring the ribs formed on the outside surfaces of the upper transport container into alignment with a specific groove of the respective rows of grooves which are provided on the inside surfaces of the side walls of a transport container placed underneath. This is because, if filled transport containers are to be stacked on top of one another, the ribs on the outside must in each case be brought into alignment with the shortest grooves. However, if the transport containers are to be placed inside one another, the ribs must in each case be brought into alignment with the longest grooves. If this is not done successfully, and the ribs of the upper transport container are inadvertently pushed into the long grooves of a lower transport container filled with product, the upper transport container is pushed into the internal space of the lower transport container filled with product, and crushes the product inside the lower transport container. It can also easily happen that one of the ribs engages with a long groove, whilst another rib engages with a short groove, so that the upper and lower transport containers tilt against each other so that they can no longer be correctly stacked on top of one another or placed inside each other. In addition the ribs on the outside and the grooves on the inside both run at the same angle to the vertical, so that the containers can only be stacked on top of each other or placed inside each other if correctly aligned, as the external ribs and the internal grooves must extend in the same direction, to allow them to engage with each other. Consequently, if a filled transport container is erroneously placed on top of a transport container underneath in the wrong alignment, the external ribs cannot correctly engage with the internal grooves. The upper transport container must therefore be lifted up again, and turned 180° in a horizontal plane, to bring it into the correct alignment relative to the lower transport container, and place it on top correctly. Lifting the transport container and then turning it, especially in the case of filled transport containers, requires considerable efforts. Moreover the handling of these known transport containers is extremely time consuming.
From EP 0 553 932 transport containers are also known that can both be stacked on top of one another and placed inside each other. A transport container of this kind has a bottom, a rear wall, two side walls opposite each other and a movable stacking support that is positioned at the front of the transport container, to support a transport container of the same type that is to be stacked on top of a lower transport container, so that the bottom of the upper transport container is held and supported at its front end by the stacking support of the lower transport container. In the rear wall of the transport container, there are several recesses, separated from each other vertically, and on the outside of the rear wall, at the level of the bottom there are supporting projections pointing outwards, which are constructed and shaped in such a way that the supporting projections of a transport container lying on top can be inserted from inside into either the upper or lower recess of a transport container lying underneath. Depending on whether the supporting recesses are inserted into the upper or lower recess, different stacking heights can be achieved. The stacking support fixed on the front of the transport container is articulated and can be moved so that the bottom of an upper transport container can be held and supported by the stacking support of the lower transport container at different heights.
The disadvantages of this transport container are that the pivotable stacking support is relatively complicated to manipulate and can soon break. In addition, this transport container is difficult to clean, which is a very important aspect particularly for the transport of food. Finally, the manufacturing costs of this kind of transport container are very high. Finally, the transport containers described above have the disadvantage that they are relatively difficult to stack on top of one another, as a relatively complex movement is necessary to bring the transport containers to be stacked into the correct alignment with each other in each case.
Transport containers of the type described above are often stacked up to form stacks that are very high, with such stacks sometimes reaching a height that is greater than the height of the person carrying out the stacking. Further stacking must then be carried out above head level of this person, which is also described as “blind stacking”. Such “blind stacking” means that the transport containers have to be stacked without visual supervision. And it frequently happens that different parts of the transport containers to be stacked, by engaging incorrectly, get stuck on each other, so that the person carrying out the stacking has to exert considerable force to bring the transport containers to be stacked on top of one another into the correct position. In the process, it may happen that a stack of transport containers can tip over, or the transport containers can be inadvertently placed inside each other, possibly damaging the product contained in the transport containers.
There are millions of the transport containers mentioned at the beginning, which cannot be placed inside each other and are often also described as “baker's trays” or “bread baskets”. A further disadvantage of the transport containers described above, which can be placed inside each other, is that these transport containers are not compatible with the baker's trays already in circulation. This means that known transport containers which can be placed inside each other cannot be stacked on top of the baker's trays, and vice versa.
Therefore, it is the task of the present invention to provide containers which can be stacked at several levels, or placed inside each other, with the help of which the above-mentioned disadvantages of the transport containers according to the state of the art are overcome.
In particular, it is a task of the present invention, to provide a transport container which is designed to enable and guarantee safe stacking, so that transport containers stacked on top of each other cannot inadvertently be placed inside one another.
In addition, a good ratio between filled volume and empty volume of the transport container stacked on top of each other and/or placed inside each other is to be achieved.
In addition, the transport containers should have only slightly sloping side walls and/or end walls, so as to have as large a filled volume as possible, due to a slight comicality.
Moreover, it should be possible for the transport containers to be stacked on top of each other and/or placed inside each other in different alignments, so that it is not necessary to bring the upper container in a specific alignment relative to the lower container to be able for the transport containers to be stacked on top of each other and/or placed inside each other.
The transport containers according to the invention should also be compatible with the baker's trays mentioned at the start so that the transport containers according to the invention can be used together with the known baker's trays.
Finally the transport containers according to the invention should have no moving parts and be easy to clean.
These tasks are solved by a transport container with the features of Claim 1. In the sub-claims advantageous and preferred further developments of the transport container according to the invention are given.
The above transport containers for the transport of bread and similar foods were described to explain the state of the art. However, it is clear that the transport container according to the invention can also be used in other areas and is under no restrictions with regard to its size, use and the material used. Thus, the transport container according to the invention can be used for the transport of bread, vegetables, meat and eggs. Further, the transport container according to the invention can be used for example for the transport of machine parts, or for the transport of building rubble, in the form of a large steel container.
The transport container according to the invention has a bottom, a front wall, a rear wall, a left side wall and a right side wall, which are sloping slightly outwards, to form a receptacle open towards the top.
Alternatively, the left side wall and the right side wall (and, if desired, also the front wall and/or the rear wall) can be formed in a step-like configuration, wherein these walls each having a first substantially vertically extending lower wall portion and a second substantially vertically extending upper wall portion, wherein the lower and upper wall portions being connected by means of a slightly inclined outwardly extending connecting portion. Thus, the lower wall portions define a horizontal substantially rectangular cross section plane which is larger than a horizontal substantially rectangular cross section plane defined by the upper wall portions. Further, the lower wall portions and the upper wall portions are sized so that the lower part of the transport container defined by the lower wall portions can be inserted in the upper part of an underneath transport container defined by the upper wall portions, i.e., the outer dimensions of the lower part substantially correspond to (or being less than) the inner dimensions of the upper part. Substantially at the level of the connecting portion, a horizontally extending flange is formed at the outer surface of the side walls and, if desired, at the front wall and/of the rear wall. When two containers are placed inside one another, the downward surface of the horizontal flange lies on the upward surface of the upper wall portions of the side walls and, if resent, of the front wall and/of the rear wall. By means of such a construction, the strength of the transport container is increased. Further, the transport containers can be placed inside one another more easy, and canting in this condition is minimized.
The front wall and the rear wall may have a height which is less than that of the two side walls. Additionally, the front wall and the rear wall may have different heights.
In the left side wall and in the right side wall, at least two grooves are formed, which have upper openings at the upper edge of the side walls, and lower closed groove stops. These grooves are open towards the inner space of the container and, therefore, are accessible. Consequently, the grooves extend from the upper edge of the side walls, where the grooves are open and accessible, down to the groove stops, which are preferably located at half way of the side walls and preferably in the lower half of the side walls. These grooves can be formed as channels in the inside surface of the side walls in question, or extend completely through the side walls in the form of slits, making possible lower conicality of the side walls. The grooves can also be formed by means of rib-like extensions at the inner surface of the side walls, or by means of a laterally displaced arrangement of different side wall sections, or by other means known by a person skilled in the art.
In addition, at least two guide pegs are formed on the outside of the left side wall and on the outside of the left side wall, wherein the number of guide pegs on the outsides in each case being equal to the number of grooves formed in the side walls. These guide pegs are located approximately at the height of the bottom of the transport container to ensure a rigid connection to the bottom which is preferred for reasons of increased strength. The guide pegs are formed in such a way that the guide pegs of an upper transport container can be inserted through the groove openings into the grooves of a transport container underneath. The grooves are shaped so that the guide pegs of the upper transport container can slide into the grooves of the lower transport container downwards as far as the groove stops, when two transport containers are placed inside one another. Further, the outermost ends of the guide pegs are provided with downwardly extending protrusions for engaging with an upwardly extending rib or a channel formed at the upper surface of the side walls of a transport container underneath when both transport containers are stacked on top of each other. Thereby, it can be better prevented that two transport containers can be inadvertently placed inside each other. Further, the upper surfaces (support surface) may be provided with suitable ribs for engaging with the downwardly extending protrusions of the guide pegs to ensure increased strength when placed inside one another.
In a first embodiment of the transport container of the present invention, in a horizontal direction the distances between the guide pegs are different from the distances between the upper openings of the grooves. It is thus ensured that with horizontal position and vertical alignment of two transport containers situated on top of each other, i.e., the two transport containers are situated on top of each other in horizontal and parallel relationship, not all the guide pegs of the upper transport container can simultaneously penetrate into all the upper openings of the grooves of the lower transport container, thus preventing the upper transport container being unintentionally placed in the lower transport container. Consequently, the upper transport container can only be placed inside the lower transport container by a type of plunging movement (condition of being one inside the other). To do this, the upper transport container is inclined in relation to the lower transport container and the front, lowest guide peg is inserted into the front groove of the lower transport container and then being moved downwardly. In this way, the following guide peg is brought into alignment with the following groove opening and can be inserted into the appropriate groove. If there are more than two grooves or guide pegs on each side of the transport containers the third guide peg can then also be inserted into the third groove, and so on.
In this way the guide pegs of the upper transport container can only be inserted one after the other into the appropriate grooves of the transport container underneath by means of the plunging movement as explained, until the guide pegs push against the appropriate groove stops of the corresponding grooves. It is clear that in a horizontal direction the distances between the guide pegs are equal to the distances between the groove stops, to make it possible for the upper transport container to be placed inside the lower transport container in a horizontal position (i.e. a horizontal and parallel relationship of two transport containers one above the other).
In a second embodiment of the transport container of the present invention, in a horizontal direction the distances between the guide pegs can be equal to the distances between the upper openings of the grooves. In this second embodiment, at least three guide pegs are formed on the outside of the left side wall and on the outside of the left side wall, wherein the central guide peg (guide pegs) is (are) shorter and preferably thicker than the outermost guide pegs. The horizontal cross sections of the grooves and the upper openings of the grooves, the number of which is equal to the number of the guide pegs, correspond to the shape of the respective guide pegs. This means that the groove openings and the grooves are formed in such a way that the outermost guide pegs can only received in the outermost groove openings and grooves, and the inner (central) guide pegs can only be received in the inner (central) groove openings and grooves. In other words, the outermost groove openings and grooves are deeper and narrower (more slim) for being able to receive the longer and preferably thinner outermost guide pegs, and the central groove openings and grooves are more shallow and wide for being able to receive the shorter and preferably thicker central guide pegs. Of course, the central guide pegs can be longer and/or thinner than the outermost guide pegs, wherein the respective groove openings and grooves have a corresponding shape. It is noted that other groove shapes and guide peg shapes are possible. However, it is important that the different grooves and guide pegs are formed in such a way that the outermost guide pegs can only be inserted in the outermost grooves and, preferably, the central (inner) guide pegs can only be inserted in the central (inner) grooves. Further, it is noted that the shape and arrangement of the grooves and the guide pegs is symmetrically.
By means of the above features it is thus ensured that, when two transport containers according to the second embodiment of the invention are situated on top of each other, the guide pegs of the upper transport container can only penetrate into all the upper groove openings and grooves of the lower transport container when the guide pegs of the upper transport container are in alignment with the corresponding groove openings of the lower transport container. Thus, when an upper transport container is pushed over the lower transport container for being stacked on top of the lower transport container, the front guide peg in pushing direction of the upper transport container can not unintentionally penetrate, because of its longer shape, into in central shallow groove opening. In the same way, a central thick guide peg can not unintentionally penetrate into an outermost narrow groove. Therefore, it is prevented that the guide pegs of the upper transport container can penetrate into the wrong upper groove openings of the lower transport container, thus preventing the upper transport container unintentionally being placed in the lower transport container when the upper transport container being pushed over the lower transport container. Consequently, when an upper transport container according to the second embodiment of the invention is, for the purpose of stacking, pushed over a lower transport container, the front (in pushing direction) longer guide pegs slide over the central shallow groove openings of the lower transport container without penetrating into the central groove openings. When the front (outermost) longer guide pegs of the upper transport container are in alignment with the corresponding front (outermost) deeper groove openings of the lower transport container, then also all other guide pegs of the upper transport container are in alignment with the corresponding groove openings of the lower container, and all guide pegs simultaneously can penetrate into the corresponding grooves such that the upper transport container can be inserted into the lower transport container. It is obvious that the upper transport container can be inserted into the lower transport container without the plunging movement as described above. When the guide pegs of the upper transport container are in alignment with the groove openings of the lower transport container, then the upper transport container can be inserted with a vertical or diagonal movement in a downward direction, whereby the guide pegs of the upper transport container simultaneously slide into the grooves of the lower transport container, which is advantageous for automatic stacking. It is obvious that the described shape and structure of the grooves and guide pegs can also be used in the first embodiment.
In addition, in both embodiments of the transport container of the invention, recesses are preferably made in the upper edges of the right side wall and the left side wall, so that the guide pegs of an upper transport container can engage with the recesses of a transport container underneath (stacked condition), so that the two transport containers thus stacked on top of one another cannot be displaced relative to each other. To enable the guide pegs of the upper transport container to engage with the recesses of the lower transport container, the distances between the recesses must be equal to the distances between the guide pegs. As described above, when the outermost ends of the guide pegs are provided with downwardly extending protrusions for engaging with an upwardly extending rib or a channel formed at the upper surface of the side walls of a transport container underneath when both transport containers are stacked on top of each other, then, preferably the recesses are also provided with such a rip or channel to prevent that the guide pegs inadvertently slide away towards the inner space of the transport container and to prevent the two transport containers can be inadvertently placed inside each other.
In the second embodiment of the transport container of the invention, the cross sections of the recesses correspond to the cross sections of the guide pegs so that, for example, an outermost longer guide peg of the upper transport container can not penetrate into a central shallow recess. As already mentioned above, also in the second embodiment the protrusions at the guide pegs and the rip or channels can be provided.
In the second embodiment, when an upper transport container is pushed over the transport container underneath for being stacked on top of the transport container underneath, the front guide peg in pushing direction of the upper transport container can not unintentionally penetrate, because of its longer shape, into in central shallow groove opening or into a central shallow recess. In the same way, a central thick guide peg can not unintentionally penetrate into an outermost narrow groove or into an outermost narrow recess. Therefore, it is prevented that the guide pegs of the upper transport container can penetrate into the wrong recesses of the lower transport container, thus preventing the guide pegs of the upper transport container can penetrate into the wrong recesses of the lower transport container, therefore, interlocking of the guide pegs of the upper transport container with the wrong recesses of the transport container underneath is prevented when the upper transport container being pushed over the lower transport container. Consequently, when an upper transport container according to the second embodiment of the invention is, for the purpose of stacking pushed over a transport container underneath, the front (in pushing direction) longer guide pegs slide over the central shallow groove openings of the lower transport container without penetrating into the central groove openings. When the front (outermost) longer guide pegs of the upper transport container are in alignment with the corresponding front (outermost) deeper recesses of the lower transport container, then all other guide pegs of the upper transport container are also in alignment with the corresponding recesses of the lower transport container, and all guide pegs can simultaneously penetrate into the corresponding recesses such that the upper transport container can be stacked on top of the lower transport container.
Preferably, in both embodiments the dimensions and designs of the bottom and of the guide pegs are preferably to be selected so that a transport container according to the invention can be stacked on top of a known baker's tray, with the bottom and the guide pegs of an upper transport container according to the invention engaging properly with the rail of a lower baker's tray. The upper edges of the side walls and the front and rear wall of the transport container according to the invention are dimensioned so that they engage with the peripheral edge of the bottom and with the projections on the underside of the bottom of an upper-baker's tray. In this design the transport container according to the invention is compatible with the known baker's tray and a combination of these can be stacked on top of one another; however it is not possible for the transport containers and baker's trays to be placed inside one another. Preferably, at the outer areas of the corners of the upper surface of the rail protrusions or upward ribs are provided, thus preventing an upper baker's tray can slide along the rail of a lower transport container according to the invention. In particular, this is important for transport containers according to the invention which have a front wall and/or rear wall which is lower in height.
In both embodiments of the transport container according to the invention, four grooves, four recesses and four guide pegs are preferably formed on each side wall.
According to the above considerations, the grooves are at an angle to the vertical, so that in general the groove stops are positioned, in vertical direction, with a distance under the recesses. Further, the guide pegs are positioned in vertical alignment with the groove stops and the recesses.
In the first embodiment of the transport container according to the invention, the grooves have a different slope, shape and curve, with the corresponding opposite grooves in the other side wall are identical, respectively. In other words, the grooves in one side wall all have a different shape, with the side walls are identical and axially symmetrical. The precise shape, slope and curve of the grooves from the groove opening in the upper edge (rail) of the side walls to the groove stop depends on the desired nature of the plunge movement, number of and distance between the guide pegs etc.
In the second embodiment of the transport container according to the invention, the grooves are also at an angle to the vertical, however, the grooves have the same shape and orientation. The precise shape, slope and curve of the grooves from the groove opening in the upper edge (rail) of the side walls to the groove stop depends on the number of and distance between the guide pegs and the groove openings. Preferably, the lower groove stops of a groove, the above corresponding recesses and the guide pegs are in vertical alignment to each other.
The essential advantage of the transport container according to the invention consequently consists in the special shape and arrangement of the grooves/slits and the guide pegs ensuring safe stacking of the transport containers filled with product on top of one another, and at the same time prevents the transport containers inadvertently being placed inside one another when being stacked on top of one another.
The shape and arrangement of the grooves and guide pegs according to the invention also makes it possible for the transport containers to be stacked on top of one another and/or placed inside one another in different alignments.
A further advantage of the transport container according to the invention consists in the fact that a good ratio of filled volume:empty volume is achieved. This means that the volume of transport containers stacked on top of one another compared with the volume of transport containers placed inside one another is relatively large. This good filled:empty ratio preferably amounts to 2:1 or better and is achieved in that the side walls and the front or rear wall of the transport container according to the invention are only slightly inclined relative to the vertical or having a step-like configuration, which means that the transport container according to the invention has a very large filled volume. The formation of slits/grooves in the side walls however at the same time means that the transport containers can be placed deep inside each other.
Yet another advantage of the transport container according to the invention consists in the fact that there are no movable parts which can break. In addition the transport container according to the invention is compatible with other transport containers.
Finally the transport container according to the invention is easy to clean.
Preferred forms of construction of the invention are now described with reference to the attached drawings; these show:
a a top view of the transport container from
b a front view of the transport container from
c a side view of the transport container from
d a detailed area of the front view of
a and 17b a diagrammatic top view and cross sectional view of the central and outermost guide pegs;
In the inner surface of the left side wall 5 four grooves 7a, 7b, 7c and 7d are formed, which are inclined relative to the vertical. In the inner surface of the right side wall 6 corresponding grooves 8a, 8b, 8c and 8d are formed, that are inclined to the vertical in the same arrangement as the grooves 7a, 7b, 7c and 7d in the inner surface of the left side wall 5. The grooves 7a-7d and 8a-8d are shown in a diagrammatic representation; the special way in which these individual grooves are inclined will be described in detail below.
On the upper edge of the front wall 3, the rear wall 4, the left side wall 5 and the right side wall 6 there is a broad circumferential edge/rail 9, which preferably has a rectangular cross-section. Alternatively it is possible that only the upper edges of the left side wall 5 and the right side wall 6 are formed with such a rail 9 or such a broad edge. The rail 9 on the upper edge of front wall 3 and rear wall 4 serves preferably to increase the stability of the transport container 1.
As can be clearly seen in
On the outer surface of the left side wall 5 there are four guide pegs 12a-12d (not shown), and on the outer surface of the right side wall 6 there are four guide pegs 13a-13d. These guide pegs are preferably formed in the lower area of the outer surface of the side walls at the level of the bottom or just above it, and also all lie in one horizontal plane. The guide pegs preferably have a round cross-section but can also have a polygonal cross-section, extend in a horizontal direction and are preferably rounded off at their outer ends. In addition, on the outer surface of the left side wall 5, at its ends near to the front wall 3 and rear wall 4 respectively, at the level of the bottom 2 there are retaining pegs 14a, 14b (not shown) and on the outer surface of the right side wall 6, at its ends near to the front wall 3 and rear wall 4 respectively, at the level of the bottom 2 there are also retaining pegs 15a, 15b.
In the upper surface of the rail 9 of the left side wall 5 and the right side wall 6 there are also four recesses 16a-16d and 17a-17d respectively. The recesses preferably have cross-section or a cross-section that matches the cross-section of the guide pegs. The function of the grooves, guide pegs and recesses is described in detail below.
The essential difference between the stackable transport container 1 of the first form of construction from FIG. 1 and the stackable transport container 20 of the second form of construction from
As is further to be seen in
It is clear that the distances between the individual guide pegs 12a-d and 13a-d respectively are in each case equal to the distances between the corresponding recesses 16a-d and 17a-d respectively. It is further clear that because of the method of representation in
The distance between the guide pegs 13a and 13b is preferably equal to the distance between the guide pegs 13c and 13d; this distance is preferably not the same as the distance between the guide pegs 13b and 13c. The same applies to the guide pegs 12a-12d on the left side wall of the transport container. The distances between the recesses 16a-d and 17a-d respectively are corresponding. Consequently the distances between the guide pegs and the recesses are designed to be in mirror symmetry to each other. In this way two or more guide pegs can only engage with the associated recesses if the upper transport container is placed in precise vertical alignment to the lower transport container. This means that the upper transport container can be pushed more easily onto the lower transport container, without the guide pegs being able to engage with the wrong recesses during the pushing movement. If, when being pushed on, a guide peg is in alignment with the wrong recess, it cannot however engage with this recess, as the upper transport container will be held on the upper edge of the rail by the other guide pegs that because of the different distances explained above cannot be in alignment with the recesses underneath. Only when all the guide pegs of the upper transport container are in alignment with all the corresponding recesses of the lower transport container can the upper transport container be lowered, which means that all the guide pegs of the upper transport container engage simultaneously with the appropriate recesses of the lower transport container.
As is also shown clearly by
It is clear that the above considerations, which because of the representation in
It can be seen that the upper transport container 20′ is placed inside the lower transport container 20″ in a position sloping downwards. First of all the front guide pegs (
It is clear that the upper transport container 20′ can only be placed inside the lower transport container 20″ by means of a kind of plunging movement. As explained above, the upper transport container cannot thus be inadvertently pushed into the lower transport container, preventing the produce inside the lower transport container from being inadvertently damaged.
This way of plunging the upper transport container 20′ into the lower transport container 20″ also results in increased stability. It also guarantees that transport containers placed one inside the other can be unstacked without difficulty. As already mentioned, the guide pegs are slightly bevelled, which makes it easier to push the guide pegs into the grooves and also facilitates unstacking (manually or automatically).
On the upper edge of the front wall 3, the rear wall 4, the left side wall 5 and the right side wall 6 there is a edge/rail 9. The front wall 3 is lower in height than the other three walls. The rail 9 on the upper edge of front wall 3 and rear wall 4 serves preferably to increase the stability of the transport container 40.
As can be clearly seen in
On the outer surface of the left side wall 5 there are four guide pegs 12a-12d (not shown), and on the outer surface of the right side wall 6 there are four guide pegs 13a-13d. The guide pegs preferably have a round cross-section but can also have a polygonal cross-section, extend in a horizontal direction and are preferably rounded off at their outer ends. The two outermost guide pegs 12a, 12d and 13a, 13b respectively at the left side wall and at the right side wall are longer and thinner than the central guide pegs 12b, 12c and 13b, 13c respectively at the left side wall and the right side wall 5, 6.
In the upper surface of the rail 9 of the left side wall 5 and the right side wall 6 there are also four recesses 16a-16d and 17a-17d respectively. The recesses preferably have a semi-circular cross-section or a cross-section that matches the cross-section of the guide pegs. As can be clearly seen in
In a similar way, the openings of the grooves are shaped to correspond to the shape and dimensions of the respective guide pegs 12a-d and 13a-13d. As can be clearly seen in
It is obvious that, when an upper transport container 40 is pushed over a lower transport container 40 in pushing direction, the front outermost longer guide pegs 12d and 13d slide over the central more shallow groove openings 16b, 16c and 17b, 17c respectively and over the openings of the central grooves 7b, 7c and 8b, 8c respectively and can only penetrate into the outermost deeper and more shallow recesses 16d and 17d respectively or into the outermost deeper and more shallow grooves 7d and 8d respectively.
In
a shows a top view of the transport container 40 of the second form of construction according to the invention.
The transport container 50 shown in
As shown in
Preferably, the guide pegs 13a and 13b have a distance of about 13 cm. Preferably, the guide pegs 13b and 13c have a distance of about 16 cm. Preferably, the guide pegs 13c and 13d have a distance of about 13 cm. The guide pegs 12a-12d on the opposite side wall have the same distances. Preferably, the recesses 16a and 16b have a distance of about 13 cm. Preferably, the recesses 16b and 16c have a distance of about 16 cm. Preferably, the recesses 16c and 16d have a distance of about 13 cm. The recesses 17a-17d on the opposite side wall have the same distances. Preferably, the groove openings 21a and 21b have a distance of about 13 cm. Preferably, the groove openings 21b and 21c have a distance of about 15 cm. Preferably, the groove openings 21c and 21d have a distance of about 10.5 cm. The groove openings 22a-22d on the opposite side wall have the same distances.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 26 149 | May 2000 | DE | national |
This application is the U.S. national phase of international application PCT/EP01/06084 filed 28 May 2001 which designated the U.S.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTEP01/06084 | 5/28/2001 | WO | 00 | 3/28/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0189944 | 11/29/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4320837 | Carroll et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4383611 | Kreeger | May 1983 | A |
4519503 | Wilson | May 1985 | A |
4520928 | Wilson | Jun 1985 | A |
4570798 | Wilson | Feb 1986 | A |
6394274 | Cheeseman | May 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
496 582 | Nov 1970 | CH |
66 07 304 | Feb 1961 | DE |
70 18 841 | Aug 1970 | DE |
33 01 159 | Jul 1983 | DE |
87 07 228 | Aug 1987 | DE |
44 32 030 | Feb 1995 | DE |
44 02 219 | Jul 1995 | DE |
44 07 973 | Sep 1995 | DE |
195 16 025 | Oct 1996 | DE |
0 250 674 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 370 771 | May 1990 | EP |
0 553 932 | Aug 1993 | EP |
2 148 851 | Nov 1970 | GB |
2 291 406 | Jan 1996 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040099563 A1 | May 2004 | US |