Stackable low depth bottle case

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6457599
  • Patent Number
    6,457,599
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, May 28, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 1, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A stackable case for retaining and transporting bottles includes outer side walls forming an outer shell, a case bottom disposed substantially within the outer shell, and a plurality of supports for supporting the outer surfaces of the bottles. The side walls include a lower wall portion and a plurality of spaced upwardly projecting pylons, where four corner pylons define the four corners of the case. At least one upwardly projecting column is generally disposed within the outer shell, and defines, in combination with the case bottom, the side walls and the end walls, a plurality of bottle retaining pockets. The columns and the pylons extend above the lower wall portions and below a top surface of the retained bottles. The end walls each include an integrally molded handle structure suspended between an upper portion of adjacent corner pylons to thereby define a generally open end wall area below the handle structure. The handle structure allows the bottle case to be manipulated with either a palm-up or palm-down orientation of the hand. The end walls further include an integrally molded structural reinforcement member extending between the adjacent corner pylons below the respective handle structure. The reinforcement members are sufficiently spaced from the respective handle structure to prevent interference with the grasping of the handle structure.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates to a low depth stackable bottle case for use in retaining and transporting bottles. More particularly, the present invention relates to beverage bottle cases that combine low depth with high stability for stored bottles, full label visibility for displaying purposes, an easily gripped handle structure, cross-locking ability for securing a plurality of stacks of empty cases, and an improved, structurally reinforced end design.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Plastic bottles are widely used as containers for retailing soft drinks and other beverages. One type of plastic, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), has become particularly popular because of its transparency, light weight, and low cost. In addition to being flexible, the walls of PET bottles are strong in tension and, thus, can safely contain the pressure of a carbonated beverage. Moreover, conventional PET bottles can bear surprisingly high compressive loads, provided that the load is directed substantially along an axially symmetric axis of the bottle. A single PET bottle can support the weight of many bottles of the same size filled beverage if the bottle is standing upright on a flat horizontal surface and the weight of the other bottles is applied to the closure of the single bottle and is directed substantially vertically along the symmetrical axis. However, if a compressive load is applied to a conventional PET beverage bottle along a direction other than the symmetry axis of the bottle, the bottle tends to buckle. This tendency of conventional PET bottles to give way under off axis compressive loads is particularly pronounced for large capacity bottles, such as the two liter bottle widely used for marketing soft drinks.




Soft drink bottles are ordinarily packaged by bottlers in cases or other containers, several bottles to the case, for shipment to retailers or for storage. The term “case”, “crate” or “tray” is used interchangeably herein to include all cases, crates, trays, and similar containers having a bottom and peripheral side wall structure. Cases of bottles are customarily stacked on top of each other. In storage warehouses, columns of cases are frequently stacked on pallets which can be lifted and moved about by forklift trucks. The stacks of cases on the pallets must, therefore, be particularly stable in order to remain standing in the face of the jostling inherent in being moved about. The technique for interconnecting stacks of empty cases, called “cross-stacking”, is often used to improve the stability of empty cases layered on a warehouse pallet. Cross-stacking generally involves stacking rectangular bottle cases to build up a layered structure, with each layer having cases oriented parallel to each other and with the adjacent layers being oriented at right angles to each other. Thus, since the adjacent layers are perpendicular, each case in the cross-stacked layer rests on at least two cases in the layer below. As a result, the cases of the cross-stacked layer tends to keep the cases on which they rest from moving apart from each other. The cross-stacked layers, therefore, stabilize the stacked structure.




Because of the tendency of conventional PET beverage bottles to buckle under off-axis loads, attempts to stack cases of these bottles may fail. For example, bottles may tilt away from vertical alignment upon stacking if conventional partitioned cases having low side walls are used to contain the bottles. Tilted bottles in the lower cases of a stack may also buckle. Even absent buckling, the tendency of bottles to tilt in conventional low sided cases causes problems. Tilting, generally, places an undesirably low limit on the number of tiers in a stack since the tilting of bottles in one case can cause the next higher case in the stack to tilt. This leads to instability if too many tiers are included in the stack.




Previously, these problems were dealt with by packaging beverage bottles in corrugated paper cartons having high sides, often equal in height to the height of the bottles. Two liter PET bottles filled with soft drinks were often packaged in enclosed corrugated paper cartons for storage and shipment. Although the high sides of these paper cartons reduce the incidence of tilting and provide additional support when the cartons are stacked, the cartons are expensive. The cost of the cartons cannot ordinarily be distributed over a number of repeated uses since corrugated paper cartons generally are not rugged enough for reuse and, therefore, they are usually discarded by the retailer.




One solution to the problems of full depth corrugated paper cartons is plastic full depth cartons; that is, plastic cases having peripheral side walls approximately the same height as the bottles. In plastic full depth cases, the side walls are the load bearing surfaces. Full depth plastic cases, however, have numerous disadvantages. They are expensive to manufacture, they are expensive to ship and store empty in a warehouse as they require a large amount of space, and full depth cases also totally surround the bottles and prevent display of the bottles.




To overcome these problems, plastic low depth cases have been used. A low depth case is one in which the side walls are lower than the height of the stored bottles, and in which the bottles support the weight of additional cases stacked on top. However, these too have drawbacks. For example, some low depth cases require additional structure to hold the bottles and ensure complete bottle stability, even the case depth is more than 25 percent of the height of the bottles.




Various plastic reusable bottle carriers are known in the art. One reusable bottle carrier is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,055,542 to Russo. The bottle carrier can be made of a plastic, and is assembled from two pieces: a handle and a carrier body having six cups for soft drink bottles. In order to stack the bottle carriers when empty, the handles must be removed. This is very inconvenient and time consuming. The '542 bottle carrier is also seriously limited regarding stacking loaded carriers. It cannot be stacked in a conventional cross-stacked structure because, as illustrated therein, the spacing between the bottles and the carriers is different in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the handle of the carrier.




Kappel U.S. Pat. No. 2,970,715 is one of the earlier embodiments of molded plastic low depth bottle carrying cases. Each bottle rests on a raised surface within an individual compartment. The bottom of the case is formed with recesses for receiving bottle tops when loaded cases are vertically stacked. However, Kappel does not indicate the size of the carrying case relative to the bottles being carried.




In Bunnel, U.S. Pat. No. 3,812,996, a reusable plastic bottle carrying case for beer bottles is disclosed. The case is designed with a plurality of bottle compartments having flat bottom walls. The cases are designed to be cross-stacked; the cases are dimensioned so that the center to center distance between adjacent bottles within a case is the same as the center to center distance between adjacent bottles in adjacent cases in abutting relationship. Thus, the vertical axes of the bottles in adjacent layers are co-linear. Although a plurality of loaded carrying cases is designed to be vertically stackable with the weight of upper cases supported by the bottles within lower cases, the lower surface of the bottom wall of the case is flat. Thus, there is no structure for assuring a proper alignment or centering of one case with an upper or lower case.




Garcia, U.S. Pat. No. 3,247,996, discloses a plastic bottle container for milk bottles. The container is shorter than the bottles which extend above the top surface of the container walls. In Garcia, the bottles, rather than the walls of the container, are load bearing. Indented circular portions may be formed in the bottom wall to receive bottle tops when containers are vertically stacked. Like many prior art bottle carriers, the Garcia container has sides of reduced height from the those of a standard full depth case; also, it can be used with a variety of bottles. However, the case is not a low depth case and is more expensive than low depth cases. It also does not have the display capability of low depth cases.




A more recent attempt to solve the problem of providing reusable, low depth, cross-stackable PET bottle cases is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,344,530 to DeLarosiere. The '530 patent has many of the features and problems of Garcia and discloses a plastic PET bottle case that is cross-stackable and has a very low depth as shown in the figures. This low depth is disclosed as being approximately 2 inches. However, in practice, this depth is insufficient because the large degree of lateral instability does not prevent bottles from tipping over. Additionally, the bottle retaining pockets are required to have a raised angular bottle seat ring which fits within the inner indentation formed in the base of many bottles to ensure bottle stability. This does not permit all PET bottles to rotate within the bottle pockets for display purposes. Additionally, it does not permit one piece bottles (i.e., petaloid bottles that do not have a base indentation) to be adequately retained.




Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,899,874 and 4,978,002, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference, disclose a low depth bottle case for two liter bottles that is cross-stackable when empty if the upper cross-stacked cases are properly positioned. In addition, in the embodiment disclosed, the substantially flat upper surface across the bottle retaining pockets permits one piece petaloid bottles and bottles with base indentations to be retained. The low height of the case side walls and the columns above the case side walls also allow the display of the bottle labels to the consumer. However, because of the low depth and the substantially flat upper surface across the bottle retaining pocket, a generally snug fit is required between the bottle pocket and the bottle and, therefore, there is a limit on the range of bottle diameters which can be retained in a stable stack.




The trend in the bottling industry today is to manufacture two-liter bottles as inexpensively as possible. This means reducing the amount of plastic in the bottle, but still maintaining sufficient bottle strength to support fully loaded cases stacked thereabove. In order to accomplish this task, the newest two-liter bottles are made to have smaller diameters and a slightly greater height than their predecessors. The result is a light weight two liter bottle having a slimmer overall profile than previous two liter bottles. The light weight bottle, however, due to its slimmer profile and increased height, does not perform ideally within the bottle pockets of the low depth two liter cases discussed above.




The low depth bottle case described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,651,461, which is hereby incorporated by reference, has overcome many of the functional shortcomings described above with respect to the prior art, however further improvements are desirable, such as improved nesting capability, improved cross-stacking stability, improved carrying stability and improved structural integrity.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




These and other problems of the prior art are overcome by the stackable low depth case of the present invention. In particular, the present invention provides such a stackable low depth case in which a handle structure is provided at opposing ends thereof which may be freely grasped about substantially the entire periphery thereof, and an integrally molded structural reinforcement member is provided below each handle for increased structural integrity, and is spaced sufficiently away from the respective handle structure to prevent interference with the grasping of the handle structure. Also, in one embodiment, bottle retaining pockets are formed in equally spaced groups of four within the case and between adjacent cases to provide 360° support for bottle caps in cone-type cap locating areas for improved cross-stacking stability.




More specifically, the stackable low depth case for retaining and transporting bottles has opposing side walls and opposing end walls that form an outer shell having a case bottom disposed substantially within the outer shell. The side walls include a lower wall portion and a plurality of spaced upwardly projecting pylons, including four corner pylons defining four corners of the case. A plurality of spaced upwardly projecting columns or a vertical rib structure is generally disposed within the outer shell and defines, in combination with the case bottom, the side walls and the end walls, a plurality of bottle retaining pockets. The end walls each include an integrally molded handle structure suspended between an upper portion of adjacent corner pylons to thereby define a generally open end wall area below the handle structure. The end walls further include an integrally molded structural reinforcement member extending between the adjacent corner pylons below the respective handle structure and sufficiently spaced away from the respective handle structure to prevent interference with the grasping of the handle structure.




The integrally molded structural reinforcement member adds significant structural integrity to the case, thereby improving the durability and useful life of the case.




In one embodiment, the plurality of bottle retaining pockets comprise two sets of four pockets configured to support two sets of four equally spaced bottles such that the two sets of four equally spaced bottles are separated by a separation distance (S), and such that each of said bottles are spaced from a peripheral edge of the case by a distance (D) which is one-half of the separation distance (S), thereby providing bottle alignment in cross-stacked cases.




Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide an improved stackable low depth case with high stability for stored bottles, full label visibility for display purposes, an easily gripped handle structure, a stable cross-stacking ability, and improved structural integrity for long life.




The above object and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a perspective view of a stackable low depth case in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

shows a side-view of the case of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

shows an end view of the case of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 4

shows a top plan view of the case of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 5

shows a bottom view of the case of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 6

shows an overhead plan view of a case loaded with bottles in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 7

shows an overhead plan view of a plurality of stacked cases loaded with bottles in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 8

shows a perspective view of a case in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 9

shows a side-view of the case of

FIG. 8

;





FIG. 10

shows an end view of the case of

FIG. 8

;





FIG. 11

shows a top plan view of the case of

FIG. 8

;





FIG. 12

shows a bottom view of the case of

FIG. 8

;





FIG. 13

shows an overhead plan view of a case loaded with bottles in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 8

;





FIG. 14

shows an overhead plan view of a plurality of stacked cases loaded with bottles in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 8

; and





FIG. 15

shows a schematic sectional view of a bottle cap and cap locating area in accordance with the embodiment of FIG.


8


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A stackable low depth bottle case


10


is shown in

FIGS. 1-5

in accordance with a first embodiment of the invention. The case


10


includes side walls


12


,


14


, and opposing end walls


16


,


18


which cooperate to form an outer shell. A case bottom


20


is disposed substantially within the outer shell. Side walls


12


,


14


are relatively long and extend the length of the case


10


, whereas end walls


16


,


18


are relatively short and extend the width of the case


10


. The case


10


is rectangular and is, therefore, symmetric about both centerlines which bisect the bottom surface. The depth or height of side-walls


12


,


14


,


16


,


18


is relatively low compared to the height of the bottles retained therein. The ratio of the length of side walls


12


,


14


to the length of end walls


16


,


18


is substantially equal to the ratio of the number of bottles the case holds in the lengthwise direction to the number of bottles the case holds in the widthwise direction. For example, an 8 bottle case is approximately twice as long as it is wide and holds bottles in a 4×2 relationship.




As best shown in

FIGS. 4 and 5

, the floor structure or case bottom


20


is attached to side walls


12


,


14


and end walls


16


,


18


to form the outer shell of the case


10


. Preferably, the case


10


is made from plastic and is molded integrally as a single component.




As shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the side walls


12


,


14


each include a lower wall portion


22


and a plurality of spaced upwardly projecting pylons


24


,


26


,


28


,


30


,


32


, including the four corner pylons


24


,


32


defining four corners of the case


10


.




As shown in

FIG. 4

, a vertical rib structure


34


is, generally, disposed within the outer shell, and defines, in combination with the case bottom


20


, side walls


12


,


14


and end walls


16


,


18


, a plurality of bottle retaining pockets


36


,


38


,


40


,


42


,


44


,


46


,


48


,


50


for retaining bottles such as two-liter plastic bottles.




Preferably, the vertical rib structure


34


includes first, second, and third upwardly projecting columns


52


,


54


,


56


. Accordingly, the various columns


52


,


54


,


56


cooperate with the pylons


24


,


26


,


28


,


30


,


32


, and with the case bottom


20


, to form the bottle retaining pockets


36


,


38


,


40


,


42


,


44


,


46


,


48


,


50


.




Referring to

FIGS. 1 and 3

, the end walls


16


,


18


each comprise an integrally molded handle structure


58


,


60


having interior and exterior surfaces


62


,


64


, respectively, as shown in

FIG. 4

, suspended between an upper portion of adjacent corner pylons


32


or


24


. A generally open area is defined below the interior and exterior surfaces


62


,


64


of the handle structures


58


,


60


and between the interior surfaces


62


of the handle structure


58


,


60


and the adjacent column


56


,


52


respectively, such that the handle structure


58


,


60


may be freely grasped about substantially the entire periphery thereof.




Referring to

FIGS. 1 and 3

, the present invention is particularly characterized by the integrally molded structural reinforcement members


66


,


68


extending between the adjacent corner pylons,


32


or


24


, below the respective handle structure


58


,


60


. Such structural reinforcement members


66


,


68


are sufficiently spaced from the respective handle structure


58


,


60


to prevent interference with the grasping of the handle structure. Because the crates are subject to shipping, handling, fork lift manipulation, etc., it is desirable to heavily reinforce the handle ends. The structural reinforcement members


66


,


68


provided in the present invention add significant structural integrity to the case


10


, thereby substantially increasing the expected usable life of the case


10


. A case full of eight two-liter bottles can place the ends of the crate under significant torsional and bending forces, however, the reinforcement members


66


,


68


alleviate adverse effects of such forces.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, the opening


70


between the handle structure


58


and reinforcement member


66


, for example, presents a molding problem because the core and cavity of the injection molding tool used to manufacture the part is not simply an “open-and-close” tool. Rather, features such as a collapsible core and slide mechanism are required at each end of the crate to moldin such structure.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, the reinforcement members


66


,


68


also include a horizontally extending surface


72


,


74


, respectively, which provides additional torsional strength.




In this embodiment, the reinforcement members


66


,


68


extend down to the case bottom


20


. The reason for this configuration is that the crates are sometimes conveyed on conveyor belts with upstanding tabs used to engage the crate for stopping the conveyor. Accordingly, the reinforcement members


66


,


68


will engage the upstanding tabs to stop the conveyor.




Also, the handles


58


,


60


are spaced down approximately 1 inch from the tops of the pylons


24


,


32


for improved nesting.




Turning to

FIG. 5

, another feature of the invention is illustrated. As shown, each corner of the case


10


includes a reinforcement rib


78


,


80


,


82


,


84


, which not only adds additional strength to the case


10


, but also prevents entry of a bottle cap through the bottom of the case. For example, if the case


10


were slid across a plurality of bottles which are supported within cases positioned thereunder, the ribs


78


,


80


,


82


,


84


would prevent entry of a bottle cap through the bottom surface of the case


10


because the ribs


78


,


80


,


82


,


84


are sufficiently close to adjacent ribs so that insufficient space is provided for such passage of a bottle cap. Therefore, free sliding motion of the case


10


across a plurality of stacked bottles is enabled.




Referring to

FIGS. 6 and 7

, top plan views are shown, respectively, of a case


10


loaded with bottles


11


having bottle caps


13


, and a layer of stacked cases


10


loaded with bottles


11


. In this configuration, the bottle pockets are arranged so that the 2 liter bottles contact each other when the case is loaded, thereby minimizing the size of each case. However, when the cases are cross-stacked, as illustrated by the case


10


′ shown in dashed lines, the bottle caps


13


,


13


′ of the stacked cases are misaligned throughout the cross-stacked pallets. Accordingly, the case bottoms


20


must have clover-shaped bottle cap locating areas


17


, as shown in

FIG. 5

, to receive the bottle caps from the case immediately below for improved stacking stability. This provides approximately 130° to 150° of bottle cap containment.




Referring to

FIGS. 8-14

, a case


110


is shown in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention. The case


110


is in many respects similar to that shown in

FIGS. 1-7

. The case


110


includes side walls


112


,


114


and end walls


116


,


118


. A case bottom


120


is attached to the side walls


112


,


114


and end walls


116


,


118


to form the outer shell of the case


110


.




A plurality of pylons


124


,


126


,


128


,


130


,


132


are provided adjacent the lower wall portion


122


of the side walls


112


,


114


on both sides of the case


110


, including corner pylons


124


,


132


which form the four corners of the case


110


.




The vertical rib structure


134


includes a plurality of ribs which cooperate with the various pylons to form the bottle retaining pockets


136


,


138


,


140


,


142


,


144


,


146


,


148


,


150


, as shown in FIG.


11


. As shown in

FIGS. 8 and 11

, the vertical rib structure


134


includes a single column


152


in the center of the case


110


.




As shown in

FIG. 8

, the case


110


includes handle structures


158


,


160


at opposing ends of the case


110


. In this embodiment, the handle structures


158


,


160


are positioned at the top of the pylons


124


,


132


to provide a higher center of gravity and a higher grasping position, which results in a more stable and easier-to-carry crate.




The opposing ends


116


,


118


of the case


110


also include reinforcement members


166


,


168


spaced sufficiently away from the respective handle structures


158


,


160


so as not to interfere with grasping of the handle structures


158


,


160


. As shown in

FIGS. 8 and 10

, the reinforcement members


166


,


168


include a lower edge


170


bordering a cut-out portion at the bottom of each opposing end


116


,


118


. Accordingly, the reinforcement members


166


,


168


do not extend to the case bottom


120


. The cut out portion


170


improves nesting capability by enabling a deeper engagement between adjacent nested crates.




The pylons and column structures provided in the embodiments described herein also facilitate stacking of adjacent cases on top of each other when empty.




In this embodiment, the bottle retaining pockets are formed in groups of four which are equally spaced within the case and between adjacent cases to provide 360° of support for bottle caps in cone-type locating areas (as opposed to the previously described clover-shaped locating areas


17


) for improved cross-stacking stability. Referring to

FIG. 13

, each case


110


includes two groups


111


,


113


of equally spaced groups of four bottle retaining pockets for holding four bottles in contact with each other. The two groups of bottles


111


,


113


are spaced apart by a distance S, which is twice the distance D of the side of each bottle from the periphery of the case


110


.




By maintaining an equal distance between groups of four bottles within the case and between adjacent stacked cases, all bottle caps are vertically aligned in stacks, even when the cases are cross-stacked. As shown in

FIG. 14

, the distance L between groups of four bottles is maintained throughout the adjacent cases, which provides bottle cap alignment when the cases are cross-stacked. This configuration allows the use of cone-type bottle cap receiving areas


151


on the bottom of each case, shown in

FIG. 15

, to provide 360° of support on each bottle cap


153


, which improves stacking stability. As shown, the cap


153


is always centered in the cone-shaped bottle cap receiving areas


151


, which resists lateral movement in all directions.




While the best modes for carrying out the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize the various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A low depth bottle case for retaining and transporting bottles comprising:opposing sidewalls and opposing end walls forming an outer shell, the side walls and end walls having a height less than the height of the retained bottles, wherein the end walls each comprise an open area formed therein to define a handle structure, the sidewalls having an upper edge portion; a case bottom disposed substantially within the outer shell and integrally formed therewith to define a unitary construction; a plurality of bottle retaining pockets generally disposed within the outer shell for retaining the bottles; a plurality of vertically disposed sidewall pylons extending inwardly from each sidewall, each sidewall pylon forming part of a pair of adjacent bottle pockets; a plurality of upwardly extending columns, each disposed between a respective set of adjacent bottle pockets, each of the plurality of columns extending above the upper edge portion of the opposing side walls and below a top surface of the retained bottles, wherein one of the columns extends by a predetermined vertical distance above a first location disposed along a first upper edge of one of the opposing sidewalls, the first location disposed between a first pair of adjacent sidewall pylons, and wherein another of the columns extends by the predetermined vertical distance above a second location disposed along the first upper edge, the second location disposed between a second pair of adjacent sidewall pylons; a reinforcement member protruding inwardly from each end wall to form part of a pair of adjacent bottle pockets; and a vertical rib generally disposed within the outer shell and extending between one of the columns and the reinforcement member.
  • 2. The bottle case of claim 1, further comprising a vertical rib structure of which the vertical rib is included, the vertical rib structure being generally disposed within the outer shell and defining, in combination with the case bottom, the sidewalls and the end walls, the plurality of bottle retaining pockets, wherein the rib structure includes other vertical ribs extending from at least one of the sidewall pylons to the one of the columns.
  • 3. The bottle case of claim 1, wherein said plurality of bottle retaining pockets comprise two sets of four pockets configured to support two sets of four equally spaced bottles such that the two sets of four equally spaced bottles are separated by a separation distance (S), and such that each of said bottles are spaced from a peripheral edge of the case by a distance (D) which is one-half of the separation distance (S), thereby providing bottle alignment in cross-stacked cases.
  • 4. The bottle case of claim 1 wherein each reinforcement member extends from the respective end wall below the respective handle structure.
  • 5. The bottle case of claim 1, further comprising at least one cone-shaped bottle cap locating area formed in the case bottom for receiving bottle caps from bottles in an adjacent case.
  • 6. The bottle case of claim 1, wherein the reinforcement members protrude inwardly at a height less than the upwardly extending columns.
  • 7. The bottle case of claim 1 wherein the end walls each include an open area formed therein to define a handle structure, and wherein each reinforcement member extends from the respective end wall below the respective handle structure.
  • 8. The bottle case of claim 1, wherein the sidewall pylons extend above the sidewalls.
  • 9. A low depth case for retaining and transporting bottles, the low depth case comprising:a pair of opposing side walls and a pair of opposing end walls forming an outer shell, the side walls and end walls having a height less than the height of the retained bottles, wherein the end walls each comprise an open area formed therein to define a handle structure; a case bottom disposed substantially within the outer shell and integrally formed therewith to define a unitary construction; a plurality of bottle retaining pockets generally disposed within the outer shell for retaining the bottles; at least one upwardly extending column disposed between a set of adjacent bottle pockets, the column extending above an upper edge portion of the opposing side walls; a reinforcement member protruding inwardly from each end wall to form part of a pair of adjacent bottle pockets, the reinforcement members protruding inwardly at a height less than the column, and spaced sufficiently away from the respective handle structure so as to reduce interference with grasping of the handle structures; and a vertical rib projecting upwardly from the case bottom and extending between the column and the reinforcement member, the vertical rib having an upper edge disposed below the upper edge of the reinforcement member.
  • 10. The bottle case of claim 9 further comprising a plurality of upwardly extending columns each disposed between a set of adjacent bottle pockets, wherein each column extends above a portion of the opposing sidewalls.
  • 11. The bottle case of claim 9 wherein the end walls each include an open area formed therein to define a handle structure, and wherein each reinforcement member extends from the respective end wall below the respective handle structure.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application No. 09/097,933, filed Jun. 16, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,073, 793.

US Referenced Citations (28)
Number Name Date Kind
2512855 Erickson Jun 1950 A
2526335 Deichert Nov 1950 A
2530481 Rawn, Jr. Nov 1950 A
2970715 Kappel et al. Feb 1961 A
3055531 De Chelbor Sep 1962 A
3055542 Russo Sep 1962 A
3247996 Garcia Apr 1966 A
3392869 Needt Jul 1968 A
3416694 Bebb Dec 1968 A
3428207 Schoeller Feb 1969 A
3812996 Bunnell May 1974 A
4162738 Wright Jul 1979 A
4295576 Steinlein Oct 1981 A
4344530 deLarosiere Aug 1982 A
4538742 Prodel Sep 1985 A
4773554 Warwick Sep 1988 A
4899874 Apps et al. Feb 1990 A
4911303 Andersson Mar 1990 A
4978002 Apps et al. Dec 1990 A
5096085 Eek et al. Mar 1992 A
5487487 Hammett Jan 1996 A
D379717 Apps et al. Jun 1997 S
5651461 Apps et al. Jul 1997 A
5660279 Apps et al. Aug 1997 A
5823376 McGrath Oct 1998 A
5842572 Apps et al. Dec 1998 A
5855277 Apps et al. Jan 1999 A
6073793 Apps et al. Jun 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
1350962 Dec 1963 FR
2302244 Sep 1976 FR
758817 Oct 1956 GB
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/097933 Jun 1998 US
Child 09/579120 US