1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a stackable low depth tray for storing and transporting beverage containers, such as bottles.
2. Background Art
Bottles, particularly for soft drinks and other beverages, are often stored and transported in trays. The term “tray” as used herein includes trays, crates, cases, and similar containers having a floor and a peripheral side wall structure. As compared with other materials, plastic trays provide advantages such as strength, durability, and reusability. In order to minimize the storage space of trays, reduce their cost and weight, and promote display of the bottles contained therein, many trays are constructed to have shallow side and end walls. Such trays are generally referred to as “low depth” trays in which the side and end walls are lower than the height of the stored bottles, and in which the bottles support the weight of additional trays stacked on top.
In general, bottles go through a bottling facility and to the bottler's warehouse in the following order: the bottles are filled, sealed, loaded into trays, and then layers of trays are placed on pallets. Trays in successive layers are stacked or cross-stacked on top of each other, with the bottles bearing most of the load of above-stacked trays. The stacks of trays must be particularly stable in order to remain standing during the jostling inherent when the pallets are moved into and out of the warehouse.
Plastic bottles are widely used as containers for retailing soft drinks and other beverages. One type of plastic, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), has become particularly popular because of its transparency, light weight, and low cost. In addition to being flexible, the walls of PET bottles are strong in tension and thus can safely contain the pressure of a carbonated beverage. Moreover, conventional PET bottles can bear relatively high compressive loads, provided that the load is directed substantially along an axially symmetric axis of the bottle. A single PET bottle can support the weight of many bottles of the same size filled with beverage if the bottle is standing upright on a flat, horizontal surface and the weight of the other bottles is applied to the closure of the single bottle and is directed substantially vertically along its symmetric axis. However, if a compressive load is applied to a conventional PET beverage bottle along a direction other than the symmetry axis of the bottle, the bottle may buckle, particularly for large capacity bottles such as the two-liter bottle widely used for marketing soft drinks.
Bottles can also tilt away from vertical alignment upon stacking if conventional partitioned trays having low side walls are used to contain the bottles. Tilted bottles in the lower trays of a stack can buckle, causing the stack to fall. Even absent buckling, the tendency of bottles to tilt in conventional low-sided trays causes instability and places an undesirably low limit on the number of tiers that can be included in a stack.
With the aforementioned issues regarding bottle stability and storage and handling processes in mind, there are several features which are desirable for the design of low depth bottle trays. Generally, low depth trays should have a wall structure that provides sufficient support for the bottles stored therein while also allowing the bottles to be visible for merchandising purposes. In addition, trays should be designed with structural features which enhance their stability when stacked and cross-stacked. Still further, the trays should have sufficient strength and rigidity to withstand shipping and handling. Lastly, the trays should be lightweight, easy to manipulate and carry, and efficient to mold.
Current low depth trays are typically designed with a trade-off between strength and weight, wherein material is often removed to decrease weight, thus reducing structural integrity or bottle stability. Also, many low depth trays are inefficient to mold, typically due to the design of bottle support members which extend upwardly from and within the low side walls. Long mold times render trays susceptible to uneven cooling, which can cause warping and dimensional inaccuracies as well as possibly decreasing the life of the tray.
Therefore, it is an object according to the present invention to provide an improved low depth tray for storing, transporting, and displaying beverage containers, such as bottles.
It is another object according to the present invention to provide a low depth tray which is designed to have a decreased weight without compromising the structural integrity of the tray and the stability of the bottles loaded therein.
It is yet another object according to the present invention to provide a low depth tray which can be more efficiently molded allowing for faster and more even cooling of the tray.
Accordingly, a low depth tray for bottles is provided which includes a first pair of opposed walls, a second pair of opposed walls attached to the first pair of opposed walls to form a wall structure, a base attached to the wall structure, and a plurality of interior divider walls extending upwardly from the base. At least one member, or column, projects upwardly from an interior of the wall structure and is connected to the divider walls, where the interior member has a height less than the height of the wall structure and less than the height of bottles loaded in the tray. Together, the interior member, the base, the divider walls, and the wall structure define a plurality of bottle retaining pockets which are each sized to receive a single bottle therein.
The wall structure includes an upper wall portion having a plurality of upwardly projecting wall members, or pylons, and a plurality of windows formed therein between the pylons. More specifically, the pylons include wall pylons disposed along the first pair of opposed walls and four corner pylons disposed at the intersection of adjacent walls. The pylons preferably extend a distance above the base of approximately 40% of the height of bottles loaded in the tray, and the columns preferably have a height of approximately 75% of the height of the pylons. Each pylon includes at least one curved surface contoured to the shape of bottles loaded in the tray, and each interior column is generally octagonal and includes curved surfaces disposed on alternating sides thereof which are contoured to the shape of bottles loaded in the tray. In a preferred embodiment, the pylons and the columns also each include an opening adjacent the base on the curved surfaces thereof.
The wall structure has a double-walled construction and includes a lower wall portion having a substantially flat outer wall and a generally curved inner wall contoured to the shape of bottles loaded in the tray. The bottle retaining pockets are preferably sized to receive two-liter bottles.
Each of the second pair of opposed walls includes a handle structure, where each handle structure includes an upper bar extending between adjacent corner pylons, a lower support member connected to the corner pylons and the base, and a slot defined therebetween. Advantageously, a user's fingers can be inserted through the slot and under the upper bar in a palm-up orientation, and over the upper bar and through the slot in palm-down orientation. The upper bar and the corner pylons are substantially equal in height, and the upper bar is outwardly offset from the corner pylons. The lower support member includes a generally horizontal portion which is connected to the corner pylons and extends inwardly into the tray, and a generally vertical portion which extends downwardly from the horizontal portion to join with the base. The horizontal portion includes curved surfaces which are contoured to the shape of bottles loaded in the tray and form part of bottle retaining pockets located adjacent the second pair of opposed walls.
The base includes an upper surface including a plurality of spaced bottle support areas joined to the first pair of opposed walls and the divider walls. Each bottle support area is generally circular, preferably includes apertures formed therein, and forms part of one bottle retaining pocket. The base also includes a lower surface which has a plurality of upwardly recessed closure receiving areas generally opposing the bottle support areas. Preferably, the receiving areas each have a downwardly extending, generally cloverleaf-shaped periphery configured to receive and retain bottle closures therein.
The pylons and interior columns are substantially hollow to allow for stacking of empty trays. In addition, according to a preferred embodiment, the pylons are tapered from bottom to top and are angled slightly toward the interior of the tray to facilitate stacking. Furthermore, the wall pylons each include a downwardly extending recess formed therein, and the interior columns include a downwardly extending transverse recess substantially aligned with the recesses in adjacent wall pylons, and a downwardly extending longitudinal recess extending along a longitudinal axis of the tray. The depth of the column recesses is substantially equal to the depth of the pylon recesses.
Correspondingly, a plurality of pylon support ribs extend upwardly from the base lower surface to join with each pylon recess, and a plurality of column support ribs extend upwardly from the base lower surface to join with the transverse and longitudinal column recesses. When the tray is empty and is disposed in a stacked configuration with a like upper tray, the pylon recesses of the tray are adapted to receive the corresponding pylon ribs of the like upper tray and the column recesses of the tray are adapted to receive the corresponding column ribs of the like upper tray, such that at least a portion of the pylons and columns of the tray are received in the pylons and columns, respectively, of the like upper tray.
The above objects and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Tray 10 is typically formed of various types of plastic or polymeric materials, such as high density polyethylene (HDPE), by an injection molding or other plastic molding process suitable to this application. As is well understood in the art, the wall thickness of base 12, walls 14, 16, 18, 20, and other components illustrated and disclosed herein may vary depending on the intended usage and other characteristics desired from tray 10. In the embodiment shown herein, tray 10 is rectangular having side walls 14, 16 which are relatively longer than end walls 18, 20. However, tray 10 of the present invention is not limited to a rectangular shape and may include side walls 14, 16 and end walls 18, 20 of equal length forming a tray 10 of square dimensions.
In a preferred embodiment, side walls 14, 16 and end walls 18, 20 have double-walled construction which ensures the requisite strength and rigidity for transport and handling. Referring to
Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 4-5, upper wall portion 32 of side walls 14, 16 further includes a plurality of wall pylons 36 projecting upwardly between windows 34 and integrally formed with lower wall portion 26. It will be understood in the present invention that “pylon” denotes an upwardly extending hollow member associated with side walls 14, 16 or end walls 18, 20. In addition to wall pylons 36, a corner pylon 36a is disposed in each corner of tray 10 at the intersection of adjacent side walls 14, 16 and end walls 18, 20. Pylons 36, 36a preferably extend a distance above base 12 of approximately 40% of the height of bottles B loaded in tray 10 (see
In addition to pylons 36, 36a, one or more upwardly projecting interior columns 38 are disposed away from side walls 14, 16 and end walls 18, 20 along the longitudinal axis 22 of tray 10 (best shown in
Pylons 36, 36a and columns 38 are substantially hollow for reduced tray weight and also to permit empty trays 10 to stack as described below with reference to
Referring now to
Still further, as best shown in
Together, divider walls 52, pylons 36, 36a, columns 38, base 12, side walls 14, 16, and end walls 18, 20 define a plurality of bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a having substantially equal center-to-center distances. Each pocket 54, 54a includes at least one pylon 36, 36a, at least one column 38, and at least one divider wall 52 and is sized to receive a single bottle therein. In greater specificity, the four curved surfaces 40 of each interior column 38 define portions of four bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a and the four flat surfaces 42 separate these pockets 54 and are generally attached to and have a centerline coplanar with that of divider walls 52. The two curved surfaces 40 of each wall pylon 36 help define two separate and adjacent bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a, with the flat surface 42 disposed between these two bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a. Lastly, the single curved surface 40 of corner pylons 36a belong to only one bottle retaining pocket 54a. As such, four curved surfaces 40 on four separate pylons 36, 36a or columns 38 form the four corners of a bottle retaining pocket 54. However, bottle retaining pockets 54a adjacent end walls 18, 20 are an exception to this configuration, as will be discussed below.
The ratio of the length of side walls 14, 16 to the length of end walls 18, 20 in tray 10 according to the present invention is substantially equal to the ratio of the number of bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a in the lengthwise direction to the number of bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a in the widthwise direction. For example, the 8-bottle tray 10 depicted herein is twice as long as it is wide and holds bottles in a 4×2 relationship. In addition, bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a of tray 10 are sized to receive two-liter bottles, as shown in
Referring now to the top plan view of
Bottle support areas 58 are joined to side walls 14, 16 and divider walls 52 included in each bottle retaining pocket 54, 54a. Bottle retaining pockets 54, 54a of the present invention provide support and stability for the bottles B loaded in tray 10, such that excess movement of the bottles is avoided in order to ensure that the bottles remain in a vertically upright position to most advantageously bear the load of bottles stacked or cross-stacked above. As best shown in
Referring now to
Each lower support member 66 includes a generally triangular horizontal portion 70 which is connected to adjacent corner pylons 36a and extends inwardly into tray 10, and a generally vertical portion 72 which extends downwardly to join with adjacent interior divider wall 52 and base 12 (best shown in
As shown in
In addition to handle structures 62 provided on end walls 18, 20, handles or an alternate handle configuration may be provided on side walls 14, 16 such that a gripping structure is disposed on each side of tray 10 for removing cross-stacked trays 10 from a pallet, since some of the cross-stacked trays 10 will have end walls 18, 20 facing the operator and some of the cross-stacked trays 10 will have side walls 14, 16 facing the operator.
Turning next to the bottom plan view of
Referring again to the bottom plan view of
Still referring to
However, the positioning of handle structures 62 in the present invention results in unequal center-to-center distances between end bottle retaining pockets 54a in adjacent trays 10 with abutting end walls 18, 20, such that bottle closures C of the cross-stacked upper tray 10 do not align with bottle closures C in trays 10′ therebelow. Taking the non-equidistant end pockets into consideration, the present invention utilizes a closure receiving area 86 to accommodate all possible positions of the bottle closures C when a plurality of like trays 10, 10′ are stacked and cross-stacked. Specifically, receiving areas 86 are defined by a downwardly extending periphery 88, preferably generally cloverleaf-shaped as shown, and a plurality of interconnected ribs 90. Each periphery 88 is positioned to provide a range within which the bottle closures C in a loaded lower tray 10′ may reside while substantially restraining side-to-side and end-to-end movement of bottles B in order to retain loaded trays 10, 10′ in a stacked or cross-stacked arrangement even though bottles B are not necessarily coaxially aligned with each other. Base lower surface 80 further includes ribs 92 connecting receiving areas 86 to each other which allow bottle closures C to slide easily along lower surface 80 between receiving areas 86. Therefore, once the bottle closures C are disengaged from receiving areas 86 (i.e., their stacked or cross-stacked positions), tray 10 may slide along the bottle closures C in a similar lower tray 10′ to facilitate handling.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
820445 | Speer | May 1906 | A |
D103862 | Randall et al. | Mar 1937 | S |
2411673 | Vechey, Jr. | Nov 1946 | A |
D147981 | Lehman | Nov 1947 | S |
D152907 | Richards | Mar 1949 | S |
2512855 | Erickson | Jun 1950 | A |
2526335 | Deichert | Oct 1950 | A |
2530481 | Rawn, Jr. | Nov 1950 | A |
2535493 | Gerber | Dec 1950 | A |
2588805 | Cross | Mar 1952 | A |
2626079 | Keller | Jan 1953 | A |
D172664 | Emery | Jul 1954 | S |
2743030 | Read, Jr. | Apr 1956 | A |
2840256 | Cobb, Jr. | Jun 1958 | A |
2928530 | Sauey | Mar 1960 | A |
2935222 | O'Connell | May 1960 | A |
2970715 | Kappel et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
D189891 | Schiling | Mar 1961 | S |
2979222 | Levine | Apr 1961 | A |
3009579 | Ettlinger, Jr. | Nov 1961 | A |
3055531 | Chelbor | Sep 1962 | A |
3055542 | Russo | Sep 1962 | A |
3092284 | Stout | Jun 1963 | A |
D195702 | Russo | Jul 1963 | S |
3148797 | Cloyd | Sep 1964 | A |
3151762 | Vidal | Oct 1964 | A |
3155268 | Fogerty et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3184148 | Poupitch | May 1965 | A |
D201257 | Vidal | Jun 1965 | S |
3247996 | Garcia | Apr 1966 | A |
3283947 | Cornelius | Nov 1966 | A |
3297190 | Cloyd | Jan 1967 | A |
D208111 | Vidal | Jul 1967 | S |
3332574 | Earp | Jul 1967 | A |
3333727 | Belcher et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3333729 | Rabb | Aug 1967 | A |
3334767 | Cornelius et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3349943 | Box | Oct 1967 | A |
D209864 | Versteeg | Jan 1968 | S |
3376998 | Cornelius | Apr 1968 | A |
3384261 | Austin | May 1968 | A |
3390801 | Adomat | Jul 1968 | A |
3391814 | Box | Jul 1968 | A |
3391815 | Box | Jul 1968 | A |
3392869 | Needt | Jul 1968 | A |
3416694 | Bebb | Dec 1968 | A |
3428207 | Schoeller | Feb 1969 | A |
3517852 | Schoeller | Jun 1970 | A |
3638824 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3701449 | Schoeller | Oct 1972 | A |
3759416 | Constantine | Sep 1973 | A |
D229674 | Quigg | Dec 1973 | S |
3812996 | Bunnell | May 1974 | A |
3865239 | Herolzer et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3949876 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3998327 | Box | Dec 1976 | A |
4027796 | Martin | Jun 1977 | A |
4037722 | Bremer | Jul 1977 | A |
4040517 | Torokvei | Aug 1977 | A |
4071162 | Steinlein et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4095720 | Delbrouck et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4101049 | Wallace et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4161259 | Palafox | Jul 1979 | A |
4162738 | Wright | Jul 1979 | A |
4202448 | Jaeger et al. | May 1980 | A |
4204596 | Davis | May 1980 | A |
4319685 | David | Mar 1982 | A |
4344530 | deLarosiere | Aug 1982 | A |
D266709 | Box | Oct 1982 | S |
4410099 | deLarosiere | Oct 1983 | A |
4416373 | deLarosiere | Nov 1983 | A |
D275142 | Torokvei | Aug 1984 | S |
4538742 | Prodel | Sep 1985 | A |
4548320 | Box | Oct 1985 | A |
D283103 | Cushing et al. | Mar 1986 | S |
D284841 | Rowland et al. | Jul 1986 | S |
D289938 | Warwick | May 1987 | S |
D291178 | Toms | Aug 1987 | S |
4700836 | Hammett | Oct 1987 | A |
4700837 | Hammett | Oct 1987 | A |
D295107 | Frost | Apr 1988 | S |
4773554 | Warwick | Sep 1988 | A |
4789063 | Hammett | Dec 1988 | A |
4848580 | Wise | Jul 1989 | A |
D304123 | Warwick | Oct 1989 | S |
4899874 | Apps et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911303 | Andersson | Mar 1990 | A |
4928841 | Arthurs | May 1990 | A |
4932532 | Apps et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4978002 | Apps et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
D313493 | Apps et al. | Jan 1991 | S |
D317670 | Apps | Jun 1991 | S |
D318552 | Apps | Jul 1991 | S |
5031774 | Morris et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
D319129 | Apps et al. | Aug 1991 | S |
D320298 | Apps et al. | Sep 1991 | S |
5060819 | Apps | Oct 1991 | A |
5071026 | Apps | Dec 1991 | A |
5096085 | Eek et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
D325279 | Apps | Apr 1992 | S |
5105948 | Morris et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
D326749 | Apps et al. | Jun 1992 | S |
D327357 | Rehrig | Jun 1992 | S |
D327972 | Apps et al. | Jul 1992 | S |
D329931 | Apps | Sep 1992 | S |
D329932 | Apps | Sep 1992 | S |
5184748 | Apps | Feb 1993 | A |
5305884 | Apps et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5316172 | Apps et al. | May 1994 | A |
5335814 | Hepp | Aug 1994 | A |
D350438 | Apps et al. | Sep 1994 | S |
5421477 | Hammett | Jun 1995 | A |
D360758 | Umiker | Aug 1995 | S |
D361431 | Koefelda | Aug 1995 | S |
5465843 | Koefelda | Nov 1995 | A |
5487487 | Hammett | Jan 1996 | A |
5501352 | Apps | Mar 1996 | A |
5529176 | Apps et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
D378249 | Apps et al. | Mar 1997 | S |
D379121 | Apps et al. | May 1997 | S |
D379717 | Apps et al. | Jun 1997 | S |
D380613 | Apps et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
D380901 | Apps et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
5651461 | Apps et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660279 | Apps et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704482 | Apps et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
D399060 | Apps et al. | Oct 1998 | S |
D400012 | Apps | Oct 1998 | S |
5823376 | McGrath | Oct 1998 | A |
5842572 | Apps et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
D404204 | Apps | Jan 1999 | S |
5855277 | Apps et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
D410778 | Apps et al. | Jun 1999 | S |
D412399 | Apps et al. | Aug 1999 | S |
5964343 | Steiner | Oct 1999 | A |
5979654 | Apps | Nov 1999 | A |
D417784 | Umiker | Dec 1999 | S |
6006912 | McGrath | Dec 1999 | A |
D420220 | Apps et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
6047844 | McGrath | Apr 2000 | A |
6073793 | Apps et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079554 | Hammett et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
680197 | Oct 1966 | BE |
693216 | Jul 1967 | BE |
965056 | Mar 1975 | CA |
1109433 | Sep 1981 | CA |
1207268 | Dec 1965 | DE |
0 099 827 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0 210 712 | Aug 1990 | EP |
1 008 527 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1285689 | Jan 1962 | FR |
1350962 | Dec 1963 | FR |
1351218 | Dec 1963 | FR |
1518610 | Feb 1968 | FR |
2302244 | Sep 1976 | FR |
943947 | Dec 1963 | GB |
1032916 | Jun 1966 | GB |
1115343 | May 1968 | GB |
1120067 | Jul 1968 | GB |
1152038 | May 1969 | GB |
1312701 | Apr 1973 | GB |
1319726 | Jun 1973 | GB |
1330778 | Sep 1973 | GB |
2 079 256 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2 135 278 | Aug 1984 | GB |
2158044 | Nov 1985 | GB |
6505562 | Oct 1966 | NE |
WO 8201536 | May 1982 | WO |
WO 9807636 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 0041937 | Jul 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020195452 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |