The present invention relates to molded plastic chairs. More particularly, the present invention relates to a molded plastic rocking chair that nests or fits within an identical rocking chair when such chairs are vertically stacked.
A wide variety of molded plastic chairs that stack one upon another are available in the marketplace. These prior art chairs have a seat, a back, front legs and rear legs directly connected to the seat, and usually have arms extending from the seat to the back. Each arm creates an opening bounded by that arm, the back and the seat. The legs extend outwardly from vertical to enable the chairs to be stacked one on top of another. In some stackable plastic chairs the rear legs of the uppermost chair extend through the openings bounded by the arms, back and seat of the chair below that chair in the stack. Stackable chairs have an advantage in that they can be stacked upon one another and placed on a pallet for easy transport. A retailer may display the stacked chairs on the same pallet on which they have been shipped. Consumers may also store several stackable chairs stacked one upon another. Plastic chairs are also advantageous because they are comfortable, inexpensive to manufacture, practical, lightweight, portable, water and weatherproof, sturdy, attractive, relatively easy to care for, and easy to move to and from a stacked arrangement.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,341,419 and 5,002,337 disclose examples of stackable side chairs. U.S. Pat. No. 7,401,854 discloses a stackable folding Adirondack chair. U.S. Pat. No. D688,885 discloses a stackable bar stool. All of these chairs have four legs with feet that rest on the floor or ground. For many years there has been a need for a stackable plastic rocking chair. Woodring in a series of related patents including U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,070,229, 8,313,141 and 8,960,792 discloses a monobloc rocking chair which is injection molded in one piece. He teaches that the side walls of the chair which includes the legs and the rockers must diverge outwardly from the top of the chair to the bottom so that the chairs can be stacked. Because of the outward divergence of the legs, the relatively small contact area between the floor and the rockers and the fact that the contact area changes as a person rocks in the chair, the rockers in the Woodring rocking chair can splay outwardly when a person sitting on the chair rocks back and forth. Continued rocking can cause the legs to break or cause the rockers to break away from the legs, breakage being more likely as the weight on the chair increases.
Plastic chairs for outdoor use must meet certain standard performance requirements. ASTM F 1561-03 standard sets forth specific tests to be performed in order to determine if a plastic chair meets those requirements. One test involves placing the chair on a glass surface which simulates smooth surfaces such as linoleum and wet pool decks. Three hundred pounds is placed on the chair. The chair must then hold for at least 30 minutes without failing. Failure occurs when the chair collapses or when any visible evidence of structural damage develops such as cracking. Chairs are often left up beyond 30 minutes to further evaluate performance even though that is not specified as necessary per the ASTM standard. Another test involves dropping a bag of shot onto the seat of the chair from a height of six inches above the seat. This test is conducted using a bag that weighs 150 pounds. The impact is repeated ten times. There must be no breakage or structural damage. The static load and impact tests are then repeated on plywood to simulate rougher surfaces such as textured concrete or treated lumber used on a deck. There are other tests required by the ASTM standard, but the tests described above are the core tests for that standard.
Retailers may require that other tests in addition to those outlined in the ASTM standard must be passed before they will sell a resin chair. The other tests may be derived from other standards that exist in the industry. BIFMA X5.1 requires that the chairs must pass one impact of 225 lbs. from six inches. Additional required tests may be “home-grown” where the retailer creates their own protocol such as one intended to simulate actual use. One example is a test where a rocking chair is loaded with weight such as used in a standard static load test and then rocked for a large number of cycles. Finally, there are test protocols for chairs intended to be marketed to large occupants. These chairs must withstand impacts of greater than 225 lbs.
Molded rocking chairs may be required to pass any or all of the tests described above, or other tests not described herein, to be deemed sufficient for retail distribution. It is unlikely that rocker like that illustrated in the Woodring patents will pass all of the required tests.
Consequently, there is a need for a stackable plastic rocking chair that will pass all of the tests that may be required for retail distribution.
We provide a rocking chair having a seat, a back attached to the seat, at least one right leg connected to the seat, at least one left leg connected to the seat, a right rocker attached to the right leg or legs and a left rocker attached to the left leg or legs. The rockers have a base having an inside edge and an outside edge. Preferably the base of each rocker has a slope such that when the rocking chair is placed on a flat surface a portion of the inside edge will be in contact with the flat surface and the outside edge will not be in contact will the flat surface.
We further prefer to construct the rockers so that they have a center portion which has an inward curvature. The center portion has an apex, a first end and a second end and the inward curvature is such that the apex of the curvature is displaced from the ends of the curvature by from 0.1 to 1.0 inch.
The rockers may be hollow having an inside side wall and an outside side wall and a base which is removably attached to either or both side walls. Preferably tabs are provided on the base which provides a snap fit between the base and the side walls. The tabs should be sized and positioned to enable the base to expand along its length when a weight is dropped onto the seat of the chair.
Other features and advantages of our stackable rocking chair will become apparent from certain present preferred embodiments thereof which are shown in the drawings.
Referring to
We prefer to provide a removable base 10, 11 on each of the rockers 5, 6. As seen most clearly in
We further prefer to provide tabs 22 on the top surface of each rocker base that enable the base to snap fit onto the rocker. The tabs may be configured to mate with ribs or slots (not shown) on the inside surface of the inside wall and the inside surface of the outside wall of the rocker. When a downward force acts on the rockers, the removable bases and the side walls of the rockers expand along their length. Because the base fits over the side walls, the base has a larger effective radius than the side walls. Consequently, upon impact the base expands more than the side walls expand. For the base to stay within the channel between the side walls of the rocker the base must have clearance to expand at each end. To keep the clearance intact so the base cannot bottom out at one end, the center of the base must be held securely. As shown in
We further prefer that the base of each rocker be sloped so that when the rocking chair is placed on a flat surface a portion of the inside edge and a portion of the base adjacent that portion of the inside edge will be in contact with the flat surface while the outside edge will not be in contact will the flat surface. In a present preferred embodiment, shown in
We created a prototype first rocking chair similar to that shown in the drawings although we did not curve the center portion of the rockers inward. The rockers were straight. We tested the chair by dropping a 150 lb. bag of shot five inches onto the seat. This is not as high as the standard test height, but as it was a prototype chair we did not want to use full force. Even with the drop height being lower than is standard, during impact at least one rocker broke off where it meets the front leg. This illustrated the potential outward force vector and resulting outward torque which can act upon the rockers if their center portion is not curved inward. This force seems travels frontward and rearward from the contact point of the rocker with the floor to around where the rockers meet the legs, increasing the stress around those locations to the point of seeing breakage.
We modified one of the rocker bases on a second rocking chair, a molded chair very similar to that shown in the drawings, to eliminate the slope on that rocker base and make it convex on the bottom like the rockers in conventional rocking chairs. The region of contact between this rocker base and the floor was along the centerline of the rocker between the rocker's inside edge and outside edge. The other base was left alone with a sloped bottom so that contact with the floor would be channeled to the inside region of the base. We observed that an adult male weighing about 190 lbs. rocking in the chair caused the rocker with the modified base (i.e. the one with the roughly flat bottom) to splay outward in the center. The rocker with the non-modified base (i.e. the one with slope) did not exhibit any outward splay. During several cycles of rocking, the rocker with the modified convex base seemed to work its way outward out a little more each cycle until it was significantly outwardly deformed in the center while the rocker with the non-modified base exhibited no outward splay.
We tested a third rocking chair, a molded chair very similar to that shown in the drawings. The chair incorporated rockers with inwardly curving center sections and bases with sloped bottoms to promote inside edge contact with the floor. This chair passed ten 225 lb. drops on both glass and wood. This chair also endured static load testing of over one hour holding 525 lbs. with no outward splay in the rockers. Another rocking chair with the same inwardly curved rockers with sloped bottoms passed one 350 lb. drop from six inches.
We concluded that both the inward curvature of the rockers and the slope on the base of the rockers enabled the chair to pass the tests described above with no breakage around where the rockers meet the legs and no outward splay in the center of the rockers. Depending upon the dimensions of the chair and of the rockers a stackable rocking chair having only the inwardly curved rockers could pass these same tests. Similarly, there may be stackable rocking chairs of some dimensions having straight rockers and a sloped bottom surface on the base of each rocker that will pass these tests.
Another important feature of our rocking chair can be seen most clearly in
In the embodiment shown in the drawings the rockers are hollow having a top, two side walls and a removable base. Other configurations of the rocker could be used including using an open top or providing an open side wall. One could also provide a solid rocker, but using a solid rocker on a molded plastic rocking chair will significantly increase the time required for the chair to cure and increase the cycle time. The cycle time required to produce a molded plastic chair having solid rockers may be commercially unacceptable.
We prefer to make our chair from calcium-filled polypropylene. Talc-filled polypropylene as well as polypropylene without a filler or with other fillers may also be used.
Although we have shown and described certain present preferred embodiments of our stackable rocking chair it should be distinctly understood that our invention is not limited thereto but may be variously embodied within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
232147 | Reynolds | Sep 1880 | A |
793946 | Miller | Jul 1905 | A |
1228521 | Bell | Jun 1917 | A |
1682685 | Rodery | Aug 1928 | A |
2340790 | Aylor | Feb 1944 | A |
3669490 | Bertolet | Jun 1972 | A |
4126353 | Clough | Nov 1978 | A |
4341419 | Sebel | Jul 1982 | A |
5002337 | Engel et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013086 | Benzur | May 1991 | A |
5660431 | Leach et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5702152 | Shaw | Dec 1997 | A |
5833307 | Leach | Nov 1998 | A |
5839781 | Knape | Nov 1998 | A |
6086147 | Gladstone | Jul 2000 | A |
6398297 | Cantwell | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416123 | Bell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7401854 | Adams | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8070229 | Woodring | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8313141 | Woodring | Nov 2012 | B2 |
D688885 | Adams et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D703961 | Woodring | May 2014 | S |
8960792 | Woodring | Feb 2015 | B1 |
D739152 | Adams | Sep 2015 | S |
20100066139 | Woodring | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110148162 | Huang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2171371 | Sep 1997 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160296019 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |