In the downhole drilling and completion industry, there is often need to contain fluid within a formation during various operations. Conventionally, a mechanical barrier is put in the system that can be closed to contain the formation fluid when necessary. One example of a system known in the art will use a valve in operable communication with an Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) so that if/when the ESP is pulled from the downhole environment, formation fluids will be contained by the valve. While such systems are successfully used and have been for decades, in an age of increasing oversight and fail safe/failure tolerant requirements, additional systems will be well received by the art.
Disclosed herein is a multi-barrier system. The system includes a first valve in fluid communication with a lower completion that is electrically actuatable and inductively coupled to an upper completion. Also included is a second valve in fluid communication with the lower completion, both the first valve and the second valve are positioned proximate an uphole extent of the lower completion, and both the first valve and the second valve are closable in response to retrieving the upper completion and openable subsequent reengagement of an upper completion.
Also disclosed is a method of closing multiple barriers upon retrieval of an upper completion and opening of the multiple barriers subsequent reengagement of an upper completion with a lower completion. The method includes inductively coupling an electric line of the upper completion with an electric line of the lower completion in functional communication with a first valve of the lower completion, retrieving the upper completion from the lower completion, electrically closing the first valve upon functional decoupling of the inductive coupling, mechanically closing a second valve upon disengagement of the upper completion from the lower completion, reengagement of an upper completion with the lower completion, inductively coupling an electric line of the reengaged upper completion with the electric line of the lower completion, and electrically opening the first valve with electrical signals or power transmitted through the inductive coupling.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
In one embodiment the more downhole valve 20 is an electrically actuated valve such as an ORBIT™ valve available commercially from Baker Hughes Incorporated, Houston Tex. and the more uphole valve 22 is a mechanically actuated valve such as a HALO™ valve available from the same source. It will be appreciated that these particular valves are merely exemplary and may be substituted for by other valves without departing from the invention.
Electrical lines 24 are provided to the valve 20 for electronic operation thereof. The electrical lines 24 run along both the upper completion 16 and the lower completion 12. In the illustrated embodiment an inductive coupler 26 transports electrical communication that may include one or both of electrical signals and electrical power between a first portion 28A and a second portion 28B that are in operable communication with the electrical lines 24 along the upper completion 16 and the electrical lines 24 along the lower completion 12 respectively. The inductive coupler 26 allows for retrieval of the upper completion 16 apart from the lower completion 12. Also included in this embodiment of the system 10 is a stroker 30 that may be a hydraulic stroker in some iterations.
The components described function together to manage flow between the lower completion 12 and the upper completion 16. This is accomplished in that the valve 20 is settable to an open or closed position (and may be variable in some iterations) based upon electrical communication in the electrical lines 24. The valve 22 is opened or closed based upon mechanical input generated by movement of the upper completion 16, or in the case of the illustration in
Attention is directed to the inductive coupler 26 and
In order to restore production, the same upper completion 16 or another similar upper completion 116 is run in the hole. Whether the same or a new upper completion 16, 116 is being run items similar to the ESP 18, the electrical line 24 and the portion 28A of the inductive coupler 26 are incorporated thereon. The newly installed upper completion 16, 116 can be fully engaged with the lower completion 12 to provide the full functionality of the original system 10, including the ability to open and close each of the valves 20, 22 as desired. Moreover, it should be understood that the process of pulling out and stabbing in with the same or new upper completions 16, 116 can go on ad infinitum (or at least until practicality dictates otherwise).
Referring to
The foregoing apparatus and method for its use allows for the retrieval and replacement of an upper completion without the need for a wet connection.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5372193 | French | Dec 1994 | A |
5465787 | Roth | Nov 1995 | A |
5831156 | Mullins | Nov 1998 | A |
5875852 | Floyd et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6302216 | Patel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6491102 | Leismer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6598675 | Bussear et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6675893 | Lund | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695049 | Ostocke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7152688 | Richards | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7219743 | Wolters et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228914 | Chavers et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7322422 | Patel | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7428924 | Patel | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430153 | Fraser et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7487830 | Wolters et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7617876 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640977 | Jonas | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8056628 | Whitsitt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8286713 | Broussard | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20030150622 | Patel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211768 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040159444 | Wolters et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050092501 | Chavers et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126789 | Nivens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060151183 | Turner | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070084607 | Wright et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070227727 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235185 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070295504 | Patel | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080223585 | Patel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090025923 | Patel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090078429 | Du et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100300702 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110192596 | Patel | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120138309 | Lake | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011005826 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Advanced Openhole Completions Utilizing a Simplified Zone Isolation System”; Socity of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 77438; Sep. 29, 2002. |
L. Izquierdo et all, “Managing the Retrieval of Triple-Zone Intelligent Completions in Extended-Reach Wells Offshore California”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 112115; Mar. 4, 2008. |
Dwayne Leismer, “A System Approach to Annular Control for Total Well Safety”; Offshore Technology Conference; Paper No. OTC 7349; May 3, 1993. |
K. Munday et al., “Want to Make Tree Operations Safer? Why Not Use the DHSV as a Barrier?”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 96337; Sep. 24, 2006. |
T.A. Nassereddin et al., “Electromagnetic Surface-Controlled Sub-Surface Safety Valve: An Immediate Soluation to Secure Wells with Damaged Control Line”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 138356; Nov. 1, 2010. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2011/060168; Mailed Jun. 29, 2012; Korean Intellectual Property Office; 10 pages. |
Great Britain Search Report for GB Application No. 1303095.2, dated Jun. 24, 2013, pp. 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120138310 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |