In the downhole drilling and completion industry, there is often need to contain fluid within a formation during various operations. Conventionally, a mechanical barrier is put in the system that can be closed to contain the formation fluid when necessary. One example of a system known in the art will use a valve in operable communication with an Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) so that if/when the ESP is pulled from the downhole environment, formation fluids will be contained by the valve. While such systems are successfully used and have been for decades, in an age of increasing oversight and fail safe/failure tolerant requirements, additional systems will be well received by the art.
Disclosed herein is a multi-barrier system including a first valve in fluid communication with a lower completion, and a second valve in fluid communication with the lower completion. The first valve and the second valve are positioned proximate an uphole extent of the lower completion, and a packer located proximate the first valve and the second valve is closable in response to retrieving an upper completion.
Also disclosed herein is a method of redundantly closing a wellbore nonpermanently upon retrieval of an upper completion, including disengaging an upper completion from a lower completion, closing a first valve in response to the disengaging, closing a second valve in response to the disengaging, reengaging an upper completion with the lower completion, opening the first valve, and opening the second valve.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
Referring to
In one embodiment the more downhole valve 20 is a hydraulically actuated valve such as an ORBIT™ valve available commercially from Baker Hughes Incorporated, Houston Tex. and the more uphole valve 22 is a mechanically actuated valve such as a HALO™ valve available from the same source. It will be appreciated that these particular valves are merely exemplary and may be substituted for by other valves without departing from the invention.
Control lines 24 are provided to the valve 20 for hydraulic operation thereof. In the illustrated embodiment the lines also have a releasable control line device 28 in line therewith to allow for retrieval of the upper completion 16 apart from the lower completion 12. Also included in this embodiment of the system 10 is a stroker 30 that may be a hydraulic stroker in some iterations.
The components described function together to manage flow between the lower completion 12 and the upper completion 16. This is accomplished in that the valve 20 is settable to an open or closed position (and may be variable in some iterations) based upon hydraulic fluid pressure in the control line 24. The valve 22 is opened or closed based upon mechanical input generated by movement of the upper completion 16, or in the case of the illustration in
Attention is directed to releasable control line devices 28 and
In order to restore production, another system 110 is attached at a downhole end of upper completion 16 and run in the hole. This is illustrated in
Since the valves 20 and 22 will be in the closed position, having been intentionally closed upon preparing to retrieve the upper completion 16, they will need to be opened upon installation of the new system 110. This is accomplished by stabbing a mechanical shiftdown 142 into valve 22 and setting packer 114. The mechanical shiftdown 142 mechanically shifts the valve 22 to the open position. It should be pointed out that, in this embodiment, the mechanical shiftdown 142 does not seal to the valve 22 and as such the inside of the upper completion 16 is in fluidic communication with annular space 146 defined between the packers 14 and 114. Applying pressure to the tubing at this point will result in a pressure buildup that will act on the valve 20 through the string uphole thereof since all valves thereabove, 22, 120 and 122 are in the open position. Referring to
The foregoing apparatus and method for its use allows for the retrieval and replacement of an upper completion without the need for a wet connection.
While one or more embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5372193 | French | Dec 1994 | A |
5465787 | Roth | Nov 1995 | A |
5831156 | Mullins | Nov 1998 | A |
5875852 | Floyd et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6302216 | Patel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6491102 | Leismer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6598675 | Bussear et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6675893 | Lund | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695049 | Ostocke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7152688 | Richards | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7219743 | Wolters et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228914 | Chavers et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7322422 | Patel | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7428924 | Patel | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430153 | Fraser et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7487830 | Wolters et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7617876 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640977 | Jonas | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8056628 | Whitsitt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8286713 | Broussard | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20030150622 | Patel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211768 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040159444 | Wolters et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050092501 | Chavers et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126789 | Nivens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060151183 | Turner | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070084607 | Wright et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070227727 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235185 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070295504 | Patel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080223585 | Patel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090025923 | Patel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090078429 | Du et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100206579 | Guven et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100300702 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110192596 | Patel | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120138309 | Lake | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011005826 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Advanced Openhole Completions Utilizing a Simplified Zone Isolation System”; Socity of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 77438; Sep. 29, 2002. |
L. Izquierdo et all, “Managing the Retrieval of Triple-Zone Intelligent Completions in Extended-Reach Wells Offshore California”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 112115; Mar. 4, 2008. |
Dwayne Leismer, “A System Approach to Annular Control for Total Well Safety”; Offshore Technology Conference; Paper No. OTC 7349; May 3, 1993. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2011/063519; Mailed Jul. 30, 2012; Korean Intellecutal Property Office; 8 pages. |
K. Munday et al., “Want to Make Tree Operations Safer? Why Not Use the DHSV as a Barrier?”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 96337; Sep. 24, 2006. |
T.A. Nassereddin et al., “Electromagnetic Surface-Controlled Sub-Surface Safety Valve: An Immediate Soluation to Secure Wells with Damaged Control Line”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 138356; Nov. 1, 2010. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2011/060168; Mailed Jun. 29, 2012; Korean Intellectual Property Office; 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2013/026856; Mailed May 30, 2013; Korean Intellecutal Property Office; 14 pages. |
Great Britain Search Report for GB Application No. 1303095.2, dated Jun. 24, 2013, pp. 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120138309 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |