The present invention concerns stackable packages that, when grouped in a pallet, increase the pallet stability and maximize the volume filling in the pallet. Advantageously, the said invention concerns flexible or semi-flexible packages.
In palettisation systems like other packing and packaging areas, it is more and more important to restrict the amount of packaging material used for cost and environmental reasons, or at least use recyclable materials and systems. For these reasons, and due to the reduction of packaging material, the packages become flexible, or at least partially flexible. When such flexible or semi-flexible packages are grouped and stacked into a pallet, issues arise concerning the pallet stability, especially during handling and transportation, that is to say when the pallet is moved and is subject to external mechanical forces and constraints. In order to enhance the overall mechanical resistance of the pallet constituted of flexible or semi-flexible packages, the headspace of such packages is generally filled with gas, which can be air, or more generally a neutral gas such as nitrogen (N2). Such a gas is filled at a higher pressure than the atmospheric pressure, so that the flexibility of the package is reduced or cancelled. Filling the headspace however requires an additional equipment in the manufacturing lines, which adds complexity and costs to the process, and is therefore clearly disadvantageous.
In the palettisation systems, it is however important to improve the stability of the pallets so that, while the size of a pallet is kept unchanged and the amount of packaging material that is used is decreased, the overall mechanical properties of the pallet are improved. If possible, it is crucial for a constant volume of the pallet, to increase the volume of individual packages constitutive of the said pallet.
Different systems have been developed which involve stretching films for wrapping the pallet once it is constituted, or similar systems. However, such over wrapping film solutions require a specific equipment to wrap the pallet with film, and also require quite a large amount of packaging material, or even several materials.
Moreover, it was found that during transportation or handling of the pallets, a high pressure is applied onto the pallet which is directed in the transversal direction. It is therefore a major issue to also reinforce the pallets to lateral/transversal forces, on top of the high top load resistance a pallet must have.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,793 granted to Brandt et Al. and published Feb. 21, 1989, discloses a stackable bottle which comprises a recess in its bottom portion, such that when two bottles are stacked one above the other, the neck and top handle if any of the lower bottle, fit into the recess of the upper bottle, so as to maximize volume filling on the pallet. Such a configuration also allows to increase the top load resistance of the pallet, because vertical forces applied to each bottle in the pallet stand on a larger surface, i.e. on the shoulders of said bottle, instead of standing on the closure and neck of the same. The bottles disclosed in this document are however reinforced, for example with ribs and grooves in their walls, and the latter comprise a high thickness along with the high top load resistance requirement. Such bottles, while allowing a good resistance in one direction of the pallet (vertical), still do not show sufficient resistance to mechanical constraints applied in other directions to the pallet. What is more, such bottles do not solve at all the problem of saving packaging material for ecological and economical reasons, while keeping same or even improving their overall mechanical resistance.
WO 2007/112598 A1 is an international patent application to Dean Lane, published Oct. 11, 2007. It discloses a stackable ribbed bottle system, similar to the packaging system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,793. Similarly, WO '598 packages do not show sufficient resistance to mechanical constraints applied to the pallet in other directions than vertical. Also similarly to the drawbacks in US '793, the bottles disclosed in WO '598 do not solve at all the problem of saving packaging material for ecological and economical reasons, while keeping same or even improving their overall mechanical resistance.
It is therefore a main purpose of the present invention to provide stackable bottles that participate to improving the overall pallet stability when palletized, and especially the top lad and transversal load resistance, while being economic to produce and easy to handle, stack and transport.
Finally, it is a further objective of the present invention to provide flexible stackable packages which are structured so that they can be stacked in various position, depending on whether they need to be stacked, stored, transported, or during dispensing.
The above listed purpose and needs are met by the present invention with a flexible or semi-flexible stackable package for flowable products, comprising a package body with side, top and bottom walls, and a neck adapted to receive closing and/or dispensing means that extends outwardly from one of said walls.
According to the present invention, the stackable package is characterized in that:
With such a construction, each package in a stack lies on the lower package in the stack in such a way that the load constituted by the upper package is held by the liquid contained into the lower package and the walls of the latter, rather than the neck portion of the said lower package. This allows to increase dramatically the top-load resistance of the packages in a stack, up to outstanding values.
Furthermore, such a construction of the package allows to interlock similar packages that would be grouped in rows and stacked in layers, by somehow blocking the neck of each package in a package assembly, in between the adjacent packages in the assembly. Such an interlocking allows to not only ensure a cohesion of the packages in the vertical direction, but also in the other, and particularly in the horizontal/transversal, directions. Such an enhanced cohesion improves the overall package assembly transversal mechanical resistance.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, said at least one flattened, rounded or recessed portion is disposed such that when said package is stacked in a package assembly comprising at least two layers made of rows of similar packages, the neck of said package and/or the closing and/or dispensing means for said neck, rest at least partially on a portion of the side wall of at least one package disposed adjacent to said neck in the same layer of packages.
In that way, part of the top load applied on individual packages necks is transferred to the adjacent package's side walls, which allows to evenly distribute the load amongst the different packages in a layer, and also evenly distribute the force applied to one particular package across its surface. This even distribution allows to further increase the top load resistance of the whole packaging assembly.
Advantageously, the package according to the present invention is a polyethyleneterephtalate (PET) blow-molded bottle, wherein the weight of polyethyleneterephtalate (PET) for a 3 liter contents package is equal or less than 50 g, preferably less than 40 g. It could however be made of any other material suitable for being blow-moulded such as for instance HDPE (high density polyethylene), PE (polyethylene), PP (polypropylene), PLA (polylactic acid), starched-based thermoplastic polymers, or a combination thereof.
In one first embodiment, the neck of the package is closed by a dispensing tap.
In a second alternative embodiment of the present invention, the neck is closed by a screwed cap.
In a highly preferred embodiment, the thickness at least in the side walls portion of the package is lower than or equal to 200 μm, preferably lower than or equal to 100 μm.
The present invention is further directed to a packaging assembly, comprising at least two layers, each layer being constituted of a plurality of packages arranged in at least one row, each package being structured according to any of the above described features.
Preferably, the packages of two consecutive superimposed layers in the packaging assembly are disposed in a staggered arrangement.
Also preferably, the load resistance of the packaging assembly is higher than 180 kgf for a 3 L bottle made of 40 g polyethyleneterephtalate (PET) when a transversal force is applied on one side of said packaging assembly, and the top load resistance of the packaging assembly is higher than 50 kgf for a 3 L bottle made of 75 g polyethyleneterephtalate (PET) when a vertical force is applied on the top of said packaging assembly. It was surprisingly found that a standard 3 L bottle with much more PET stands much lower top load value than our invention.
Advantageously, the packaging assembly is a pallet, and even more advantageously, the packaging assembly is such that it further comprises a interlayer insert board disposed between two adjacent layers, said interlayer board comprising apertures disposed across its surface, through which the necks of the individual packages disposed in the adjacent—upper and/or lower—layer(s) are inserted.
If we compare the compactness of a pallet (i.e. the ratio of total volume of the pallet divided by the total volume occupied by the packages) comprising packages according to the present invention to a pallet made of square bottles, it is surprisingly very close, or almost identical. The additional benefit brought by packages according to the present invention is pallet stability as the packages according to the invention are more squat then a standard bottle (eg. rounded bottles used for bottling mineral water).
Additional features and advantages of the present invention are described in, and will be apparent from, the description of the presently preferred embodiments which are set out below with reference to the drawings in which:
In
Each package 1 in the stack comprises a package body 2 with side 3, top 4 and bottom 5 walls, and a neck 6 adapted to receive closing and/or dispensing means that extends outwardly from said top wall 4. The package that will be described hereafter as an example with reference to the drawing, is a polyethyleneterephtalate (PET) blow-molded bottle, having a thickness in its side walls portion that is lower than or equal to 100 μm.
As shown in
As can be seen in
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the packages 1 comprise a recess 13 that is disposed across the side 3 and bottom 5 walls of the package, as is illustrated in
In that way, when a package is stacked in a package assembly comprising at least two layers made of rows of similar packages, the neck 6 of said package and/or the closing and/or dispensing means that is adapted onto said neck, rest at least partially on a portion of the recess 13 disposed adjacent to said neck in the same layer 9 of packages, as shown in
The space 8 defined by a recess 13 for disposing the neck 6 of one adjacent package 1 when packages are assembled—for instance in a pallet—is increased as shown in
Therefore, part of the top load applied on individual packages necks 6 is transferred to the adjacent package's side walls, which allows to evenly distribute the load amongst the different packages in a layer 9, and also evenly distribute the force applied to one particular package across its surface. This even distribution allows to further increase the top load resistance of the whole packaging assembly.
As can be seen in the drawing
Such a staggered configuration allows to increase the self blocking arrangement of the packages in the assembly. Particularly,
The construction of a package according to the present invention allows to interlock mechanically similar packages that would be grouped in rows and stacked in layers, by blocking the neck of each package in a package assembly, in between the adjacent packages in the assembly. Such an interlocking allows to not only ensure a cohesion of the packages in the vertical direction, but also in the other, and particularly in the horizontal/transversal, directions. Such an enhanced cohesion improves the overall package assembly transversal mechanical resistance.
Finally, as illustrated in
In any of the possible embodiments of the present invention, the load resistance of a packaging assembly made from stacked packages as described above is illustrated in the
In comparison, the top load resistance of a prior art packaging assembly is illustrated in the
In both of the
Dispensing is therefore facilitated when the bottle can be placed upside-down at a angle comprised between 90° (horizontal position relative to the bottle vertical axis) and 180° (i.e. completely upside down), this angle being preferably comprised between 95° and 145°. In such a—at least partial—upside-down position, the dispensing operation of the contents is facilitated due to the flow under gravity. Such a dispensing configuration is especially useful for chilled products that have to be stored and/or dispensed in the fridge like water, or liquid food products such as for instance liquid yogurts, fruit juices, coffee or cereal beverages, or other similar types of liquid or semi-liquid products.
It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08102177 | Feb 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/051946 | 2/25/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/27/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/106472 | 9/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3214052 | Dike | Oct 1965 | A |
3369688 | Dike | Feb 1968 | A |
4037722 | Bremer | Jul 1977 | A |
4308955 | Schieser et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4640423 | Mednis | Feb 1987 | A |
4805793 | Brandt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4984713 | Chambers et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5779051 | Boutin | Jul 1998 | A |
6591986 | Soehnlen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
7467714 | Slat et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20030070951 | Hurley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040256397 | Nakazato et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
31 07 716 | Sep 1982 | DE |
3107716 | Sep 1982 | DE |
35 00 674 | Aug 1985 | DE |
89 09 327 | Mar 1990 | DE |
1 483 961 | Jun 1967 | FR |
887 893 | Jan 1962 | GB |
6 707 947 | Dec 1967 | NL |
2007112598 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report PCT/EP2009/051946—date of mailing May 13, 2009, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110000812 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |