STAINLESS STEEL ALLOYS, TURBOCHARGER COMPONENTS FORMED FROM THE STAINLESS STEEL ALLOYS, AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Abstract
Disclosed is an austenitic stainless steel alloy that includes or consists of, by weight, about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium, about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel, about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese, about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum, about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium, about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon, about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon, about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen, a balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts. The elements phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels. Turbocharger turbine housings made of the stainless steel alloy, and methods of making the same, are also disclosed. The stainless steel alloy is suitable for use in turbocharger turbine applications for temperatures up to about 1,000° C.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to and claims all available benefit of Indian Provisional Patent Application IPA: 202411004989 filed Jan. 24, 2024, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to stainless steel alloys. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to stainless steel alloys used for casting applications, for example turbine and turbocharger housings, exhaust manifolds, and combustion chambers, which exhibit oxidation resistance at elevated temperatures.


BACKGROUND

During operation, automotive or aircraft turbocharger components are subjected to elevated operating temperatures. These components must be able to contain a turbine wheel generating very high rotational speeds. Exhaust gas from the automotive or aircraft engine initially contacts the turbocharger in metal sections, such as the gas inlet area of the turbocharger, at elevated temperatures. As high-speed performance improves through exhaust temperature increase, there have been attempts to gradually raise the exhaust temperature of the engine. Due to these high temperatures, the thermal load on the parts such as the exhaust manifold and the turbine housing becomes very great.


Various problems have been encountered by these increased exhaust gas temperatures contacting metal sections of the turbocharger. For example, one problem caused by the exhaust temperature rise is the problem of corrosion or oxidation. At temperatures above about 800° C., for example, and depending on the particular alloy employed, oxygen may begin to attack the metallic elements of the alloy, causing them to oxidize or corrode and thus lose their beneficial physical and material properties. Over repeated cycles of operation, corrosion or oxidation can eventually cause a part to fail entirely.


In order to overcome the challenges associated with higher operating temperatures, prior art alloys used in turbocharger applications have included stainless steel alloys of higher chromium and nickel content, such as commercially available high chromium and/or nickel stainless steel. As used herein, the term operating temperature refers to the maximum temperature of exhaust gas (barring the occasional higher transient temperatures) designed to be experienced by the turbine housing and blade components of the turbocharger. These higher chromium and nickel stainless steels are primarily austenitic with a stable austenite phase that exists well above the operating temperature, as well as minimal to no delta ferrite phase, which promotes detrimental effect(s) on the material properties. Stainless steel alloys of the 1.48XX series, such as stainless steel 1.4837, are well-known in the art. Having a specification for chromium between 24% and 27% and a specification for nickel between 11% and 14% (all percentages by weight), they are exemplary prior art materials for turbine housing applications until 1,000° C. While meeting the high temperature property requirements for turbocharger housings, stainless steel 1.4837 is quite expensive because of its high chromium and nickel content. As the turbocharger housing is generally the most expensive component of the turbocharger, the overall cost of the machine is greatly affected by the choice in material employed for this component.


TABLE 1, set forth below, provides the specifications for stainless steels 1.4837 in percentages by weight:









TABLE 1







Composition of 1.4837 Stainless Steels.










1.4837












Elements
Min (%)
Max (%)















Carbon
0.3
0.5



Silicon
1.0
2.5



Chromium
24.0
27.0



Nickel
11.0
14.0



Manganese
0.0
2.0



Niobium
0.5
1.5



Phosphorus
0
0.04



Sulphur
0
0.04











Iron
Balance










Further, some lower chromium and nickel alloys used for housing temperatures up to 1,000° C. have been investigated, however such alloys have often been accompanied by various manufacturing issues, for example associated with the casting process. For example, components formed from such lower chromium and nickel alloys may have porosity issues caused from outgassing of nitrogen during the casting process if the tapping temperature are as high as 1,650° C. to 1,700° C.


Thus, materials that are less expensive, and that have less manufacturing issues and better oxidation resistance, will be a suitable alternative to the available options. These materials should have a stable austenite phase that exists above the operating temperature, as well as minimal to no delta ferrite phase. Accordingly, there is a need for stainless steel alloys useful in turbocharger applications that are able to withstand the higher operating temperatures produced by modern engines, but that minimize the expensive nickel content. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the subject matter disclosed herein will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and this background.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Stainless steel alloys, turbocharger turbine components, and methods of manufacturing turbocharger turbine components are provided.


In an embodiment, an austenitic stainless steel alloy, includes or consists of, by weight, about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium, about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel, about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese, about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum, about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium, about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon, about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon, about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen, and a balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts. Phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.


According to an alternative embodiment, a turbocharger turbine component includes an austenitic stainless steel alloy. The austenitic stainless steel alloy includes or consists of, by weight, about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium, about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel, about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese, about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum, about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium, about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon, about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon, about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen, and a balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts. Phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.


According to an alternative embodiment, a method of making a turbocharger turbine component is provided. The method includes forming the turbocharger turbine component using an austenitic stainless steel alloy. The austenitic stainless steel alloy includes or consists of, by weight, about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium, about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel, about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese, about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum, about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium, about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon, about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon, about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen, and a balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts. Phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.


This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate implementations of the disclosure and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a system view of an embodiment of a turbocharger for a turbocharged internal combustion engine in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the nitrogen solubility limits at 1,700° C. of a stainless steel alloy that has various chromium (Cr) contents and as a function of manganese (Mn) content in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a one-axis diagram of phase fraction of a stainless steel alloy over a temperature range of from 600° C. to 1,600° C. in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 is a one-axis diagram of phase fraction of a stainless steel alloy over a temperature range of from 600° C. to 1,600° C. in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 is a one-axis diagram of phase fraction of a stainless steel alloy over a temperature range of from 600° C. to 1,600° C. in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIGS. 6A-6C are graphical representations of creep properties of a stainless steel alloy at temperatures of 800° C., 900° C., and 1,000° C., respectively, in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the surface tension of a stainless steel alloy that has various manganese (Mn) and nitrogen (N) contents over a temperature range of from about 1,200° C. to 1,600° C. in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of oxidation of stainless steel alloys at 1,000° C. as a function of time in accordance with the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As required, detailed embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the disclosure that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure.


Unless specifically stated from context, as used herein, the term “about” is understood as within a range of normal tolerance in the art, for example within 2 standard deviations of the mean. “About” can be understood as within 10%, 5%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, or 0.01% of the stated value. “About” can alternatively be understood as implying the exact value stated. Unless otherwise clear from the context, the numerical values provided herein are modified by the term “about.”


The present disclosure generally relates to austenitic stainless steel alloys suitable for use in various turbocharger turbine and exhaust applications. Exemplary turbocharger turbine components in accordance with the present disclosure include turbine housing components and turbine exhaust components, which are subject to operating temperatures up to about 1,000° C. in some applications. The turbocharger turbine housing, usually a cast stainless steel or cast iron, is often the most expensive component of the turbocharger. Reduction in cost of the housing will have a direct effect on the cost of the turbocharger. In order to withstand the high operating temperatures commonly produced by exhaust gases impinging on the turbine housing, turbine housing materials are usually alloyed with elements such as chromium and nickel in addition to other carbide forming elements, resulting in increased cost. Reducing the content and/or eliminating these expensive alloying elements will have a direct effect on the cost of the turbine housing.


Typical embodiments of the present disclosure reside in a vehicle, such as a land-operating, air-operating, or water-operating vehicle, equipped with a powered internal combustion engine (“ICE”) and a turbocharger. The turbocharger is equipped with a unique combination of features that may, in various embodiments, provide efficiency benefits by relatively limiting the amount of (and kinetic energy of) secondary flow in the turbine and/or compressor, as compared to a comparable unimproved system.


With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary embodiment of a turbocharger 101 having a radial turbine and a radial compressor includes a turbocharger housing and a rotor configured to rotate within the turbocharger housing around an axis of rotor rotation 103 during turbocharger operation on thrust bearings and two sets of journal bearings (one for each respective rotor wheel), or alternatively, other similarly supportive bearings. The turbocharger housing includes a turbine housing 105, a compressor housing 107, and a bearing housing 109 (i.e., a center housing that contains the bearings) that connects the turbine housing to the compressor housing. The rotor includes a radial turbine wheel 111 located substantially within the turbine housing 105, a radial compressor wheel 113 located substantially within the compressor housing 107, and a shaft 115 extending along the axis of rotor rotation 103, through the bearing housing 109, to connect the turbine wheel 111 to the compressor wheel 113.


The turbine housing 105 and turbine wheel 111 form a turbine configured to circumferentially receive a high-pressure and high-temperature exhaust gas stream 121 from an engine, e.g., from an exhaust manifold 123 of an internal combustion engine 125. The turbine wheel 111 (and thus the rotor) is driven in rotation around the axis of rotor rotation 103 by the high-pressure and high-temperature exhaust gas stream, which becomes a lower-pressure and lower-temperature exhaust gas stream 127 and is axially released into an exhaust system (not shown).


The compressor housing 107 and compressor wheel 113 form a compressor stage. The compressor wheel, being driven in rotation by the exhaust-gas driven turbine wheel 111, is configured to compress axially received input air (e.g., ambient air 131, or already-pressurized air from a previous-stage in a multi-stage compressor) into a pressurized air stream 133 that is ejected circumferentially from the compressor. Due to the compression process, the pressurized air stream is characterized by an increased temperature over that of the input air.


Optionally, the pressurized air stream may be channeled through a convectively cooled charge air cooler 135 configured to dissipate heat from the pressurized air stream, increasing its density. The resulting cooled and pressurized output air stream 137 is channeled into an intake manifold 139 on the internal combustion engine, or alternatively, into a subsequent-stage, in-series compressor. The operation of the system is controlled by an ECU 151 (engine control unit) that connects to the remainder of the system via communication connections 153.


Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to improvements over the currently available stainless steel alloys for use in turbochargers having operating temperatures up to about 1,000° C. In particular, embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to austenitic stainless steel alloys that have chromium and nickel contents that are less than stainless steel 1.4837 for cost considerations, and for improved formability and/or manufacturability including castability/machinability. The stainless steel alloys described herein include iron alloyed with various alloying elements, as are described in greater detail below in weight percentages based on the total weight of the alloy. Moreover, the discussion of the effects and inclusion of certain percentages of elements is particular to the exemplary alloy described herein.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium (Cr), for example about 22.3% to about 22.7% Cr, such as about 22.5% Cr. Chromium is provided, for example, to achieve the desired austenite phase for oxidation/corrosion resistance in the alloy when operating at relatively high temperatures, such as up to about 1,000° C. As stated initially, however, it is desirable to minimize the Cr content in order to reduce costs. Moreover, when the content of Cr increases, the content of similarly expensive Ni should be also increased to maintain the volume fraction, resulting in further cost increases. Furthermore, if Cr is added excessively, coarse primary carbides of Cr are formed, resulting in extreme brittleness. As such, it has been found herein that a balance is achieved between sufficient austenite phase stability and prevention of delta ferrite phase formation (along with cost reduction) when Cr is provided within the above described ranges, for example from about 22.0% to about 23.0%.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel (Ni), for example about 4.3% to about 4.7% Ni, such as about 4.5% Ni. Ni, together with manganese and nitrogen (which as described in greater detail below are included in the alloy of the present disclosure), is an element to stabilize the austenite phase, which as noted above is desirable to achieve the oxidation/corrosion resistance at high temperatures, along with the aforementioned Cr. To reduce production costs, if the content of relatively-expensive Ni is lowered, the decrement of Ni can be replaced by increasing the content of manganese and nitrogen that form the austenite phase. However, it has been found that if the content of Ni is excessively lowered, manganese and nitrogen would be excessively needed such that the corrosion/oxidation resistance and the hot formability characteristics are deteriorated. As such, it has been found herein that a balance is achieved between sufficient austenite phase stability and casting considerations (along with cost reduction) when Ni is provided within the above described ranges, for example from about 4.0% to about 5.0%.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese (Mn), for example about 4.3% to about 4.7% Mn, such as about 4.5% Mn. As initially noted above, Mn is provided for the stability of the austenite phase. Mn is an effective element like silicon (Si) (which as described in greater detail below is included in the alloy of the present disclosure) as a deoxidizer for the melt, and has a function of improving the fluidity during casting operations. To exhibit such function effectively, the amount of Mn is about 6% or less, for example about 5% or less. Higher Mn content can combine with sulfur in the steel(s) s and forms excessive level of manganese sulfide, thereby deteriorating the corrosion/oxidation resistance and hot formability. Mn is also an austenite stabilizer (as noted above) and promotes N solubility in the melt without N escaping as gas. A minimum amount of 4% Mn is used for a given Ni to promote austenite stability of the material and for a given Cr and N for effective solubility of N in the melt as per equation shown below. Therefore, it is beneficial to have Mn with the range of about 4% to about 5% for achieving the desired properties and melt processability.








Nitrogen


solubility


limit

19.628
*
C


r

+

9.009
*
M


n


>
467.51




In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum (Mo), for example about 0.25% to about 0.35% Mo, such as about 0.3% Mo. The stainless steel of the present disclosure is provided with a high temperature strength with the additional of Mo provided within the above described ranges for a lowered Nb and Ni content.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium (Nb), for example about 0.25% to about 0.35% Nb, such as about 0.3% Nb. The stainless steel of the present disclosure is provided with a high castability by forming eutectic carbides of Nb as well as a high strength.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon (Si), for example about 0.8% to about 1.2% Si. Si has effects of increasing the stability of its metal structure and its oxidation resistance. Further, it has a function as a deoxidizer and also is effective for improving castability and reducing pin holes in the resulting cast products. If the content of Si is excessive, Si deteriorates mechanical properties of the alloy such as impact toughness of steel. As such, it has been found herein that a balance is achieved between sufficient mechanical properties, deoxidation properties, and casting considerations when Si is provided within the above described ranges, for example from about 0.5% to about 1.5%.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon (C), for example about 0.37% to about 0.43% C. C generally provides hardness and strength to stainless steel and can form carbides with the metallic elements. Furthermore, C has a function of improving the fluidity and castability of a melt. When provided excessively, however, C can make stainless steel brittle, rendering it more likely to crack during use in turbocharger applications. As such, it has been found herein that a balance is achieved between sufficient mechanical properties and casting considerations when C is provided within the above described ranges, for example about 0.35% to about 0.45%.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure includes or consists of from about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen (N), for example from about 0.22% to about 0.26% N. N, together with Ni, is one of elements that contribute stabilization of an austenite phase. As the content of N increases, the corrosion/oxidation resistance and high strengthening are achieved. However, when the content of N is too high, the hot formability and machinability of steel is deteriorated, thereby lowering the production yield thereof. Moreover, N is an element capable of improving the high-temperature strength and the thermal fatigue resistance like C. However, when N content is excessive, brittleness due to the precipitation of Cr nitrides may be encountered. As such, it has been found herein that a balance is achieved between austenite phase stability and corrosion/oxidation resistance, sufficient mechanical properties, and casting/machining considerations when N is provided within the above described ranges, for example about 0.2% to about 0.28%.


In an embodiment, the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure may further include or consist of from about 0.3% to about 0.5% copper (Cu), for example about 0.35% to about 0.45% Cu, such as about 0.4% Cu. Cu further provides additional stability, for example similar to Mn, of the austenite phase when present in the above described ranges.


Certain unavoidable/inevitable impurities may also be present in the austenitic stainless steel alloy of the present disclosure. The amounts of such impurities are minimized as much as practical. In an embodiment, phosphorus (P) may be present in the alloy, but is minimized to about 0.04% or less, such as to about 0.03% or less, for example to about 0.02% or less. P is seeded in the grain boundary or an interface, and it is likely to deteriorate the corrosion resistance and toughness. Therefore, the content of P is lowered as much as possible. In an exemplary embodiment, P is excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.


In an embodiment, certain relatively-expensive carbide forming elements may be excluded beyond impurity levels. These include, for example, tungsten and the like, and any combination of two or more thereof may be excluded. It has been discovered that austenite phase stability, delta ferrite phase minimization, and sufficient mechanical and casting properties can be achieved without including these elements beyond levels that cannot be avoided as impurities, such as less than about 0.3%, less than about 0.1%, or less than about 0.05%. Further specific elements that may be excluded from the alloy (in greater than impurity amounts) include one or more of zirconium, phosphorus, sulfur, aluminum, titanium, vanadium, yttrium, boron, and/or cobalt, and any combination of two or more thereof may be excluded beyond levels that cannot be avoided as impurities, such as less than about 0.3%, less than about 0.1%, or less than about 0.05%, which percentage is dependent on the particular element under consideration. In some embodiments, sulfur is excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels, such as, if present, in an amount of about 0.04% or less, such as about 0.02% or less, for example about 0.01% or less. S in steels deteriorates hot workability and can form sulfide inclusions (such as MnS) that influence pitting corrosion resistance negatively. Therefore, the content of S is lowered as much as possible. In some embodiments, zirconium and/or phosphorus is excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels, such as, if present, in an amount of about 0.02% or less, such as about 0.01% or less, such as about 0.005% or less, for example, about 0.002 or less.


Iron makes up the balance of the alloy as described herein. The disclosed alloy may comprise the foregoing elements, in that other elements may be included in the alloy composition within the scope of the present disclosure. Preferably, however, the disclosed alloy consists of the foregoing elements, in that other elements beyond those described above are not included in the alloy (in greater than inevitable/unavoidable impurity amounts).


TABLE 2 sets forth the compositional ranges of an exemplary austenitic stainless steel alloy the present disclosure, in accordance with an embodiment of the description provided above (all elements in wt. %).









TABLE 2







Composition of an Exemplary Stainless Steel Alloy.











Elements
Min (wt. %)
Max (wt. %)















Chromium
22.0
23.0



Nickel
4.0
5.0



Manganese
4.0
5.0



Molybdenum
0.2
0.4



Niobium
0.2
0.4



Silicon
0.5
1.5



Carbon
0.35
0.45



Copper
0/0.3
0.5



Nitrogen
0.2
0.28



Sulphur
0
0.04



Phosphorus
0
0.04











Iron
Balance










Illustrative Examples

The present disclosure is now illustrated by the following non-limiting examples. It should be noted that various changes and modifications can be applied to the following examples and processes, without departing from the scope of this disclosure, which is defined in the appended claims. Therefore, it should be noted that the following examples should be interpreted as illustrative only and not limiting in any sense.


Referring to FIG. 2, a graph 200 is illustrated including a vertical axis illustrating nitrogen solubility at 1,700° C. of a stainless steel alloy that has various chromium (Cr) contents as a function of manganese (Mn) content represented by a horizontal axis. Lines 202, 204, and 206 represent corresponding stainless steel alloys having compositions corresponding to the nominal values between the upper and lower limits shown above in TABLE 2 but with the following adjusted Cr contents: line 202 having a Cr content of 22%, line 204 having a Cr content of 22.5%, and line 206 having a Cr content of 23%. With the exemplary range of N from 0.2% to 0.28%, the minimum amount of Mn is 4% to ensure that nitrogen (N) dissolves into the melt for the casting process. If the Mn content is less than 4%, then N can escape in a gaseous form if the N content is at the upper limit of 0.28%. Thus, it is evident of the criticality of the upper limit on the N content of 0.28% and the lower limit on the Mn content of 4% to ensure that nitrogen remains soluble in the stainless steel alloy and does not escape in a gaseous form during a casting process.


Further, the following regression equation for nitrogen solubility is established as a function of Cr content and Mn content to ensure that nitrogen remains soluble in the stainless steel alloy and does not escape in a gaseous form during a casting process:









Nitrogen


solubility


limit

19.628
*
C


r

+

9.009
*
M


n


>
467.51

,




wherein Cr is the weight percent of Cr and Mn is the percent of Mn in the stainless steel alloy.


In one example, for an exemplary stainless steel alloy (according to TABLE 2) in which the Cr content is at the lower limit of 22% and the Mn content is at the lower limit of 4%, solving the regression equation for nitrogen solubility is a follows:









19.628
*

(

2

2

)


+

9.009
*

(
4
)



=


4

6


7
.
8


52

>

46


7
.
5


1



,




thereby indicating that the nitrogen will remain soluble in the stainless steel alloy during the casting process.


In an alternative example, for an exemplary stainless steel alloy (according to TABLE 2) in which the Cr content is at the lower limit of 22% but with the exception that the Mn content is just below the lower limit at 3.5%, solving the regression equation for nitrogen solubility is a follows:









19.628
*

(

2

2

)


+

9.009
*

(

3
.
5

)



=


4

6


3
.
3


4

7

5

<

4

6


7
.
5


1



,




thereby indicating that the nitrogen will not remain entirely soluble in the stainless steel alloy and therefore, at least some of the nitrogen will escape in gaseous form during the casting process. Thus, it is evident of the criticality of the lower limit on the Mn content of 4.0% to ensure that nitrogen remains soluble in the stainless steel alloy and does not escape in a gaseous form during a casting process.


In yet another alternative example, for an exemplary stainless steel alloy (according to TABLE 2) in which the Mn content is at the lower limit of 4% but with the exception that the Cr content is just below the lower limit at 21.5%, solving the regression equation for nitrogen solubility is a follows:









19.628
*

(

2


1
.
5


)


+

9.009
*

(
4
)



=


4

5


8
.
0


3

8

<

4

6


7
.
5


1



,




thereby indicating that the nitrogen will not remain entirely soluble in the stainless steel alloy and therefore, at least some of the nitrogen will escape in gaseous form during the casting process. Thus, it is evident of the criticality of the lower limit on the Cr content of 22.0% to ensure that nitrogen remains soluble in the stainless steel alloy and does not escape in a gaseous form during a casting process.


Referring to FIG. 3, a one-axis diagram of phase fraction of a stainless steel alloy is illustrated over a temperature range of from 600° C. to 1,600° C. The stainless steel alloy has compositions corresponding to the nominal values between the upper and lower limits shown above in TABLE 2. As illustrated, the alpha and delta ferrite phases are not present over a wide temperature range from about 700° C. to about 1,110° C., allowing for a very high phase fraction of austenite, e.g., about 0.9 or greater, over the desired operating temperature range.


Referring to FIG. 4, a one-axis diagram of phase fraction of a stainless steel alloy is illustrated over a temperature range of from 600° C. to 1,600° C. The stainless steel alloy has compositions corresponding to the nominal values between the upper and lower limits shown above in TABLE 2 but with the exception that the N content is adjusted to 0.15%, which is just outside of the lower limit of 0.2%. As illustrated, the delta ferrite phase is present at temperatures of from about 940° C. and greater, thereby narrowing the range in which alpha and delta ferrite phases are not present, specifically from about 750° C. to about 940° C., and a resulting lower phase fraction of austenite, e.g., about 0.9 or less. As such, lowering the N content of the stainless steel alloy below the lower limit of 0.2%, results in an alloy with a less stable austenite material phase at the intended temperature of operation, such as 1,000° C., and further, with the detrimental phase of delta ferrite being present. Thus, it is evident of the criticality of the lower limit on the N content of 0.2% to ensure the stainless steel alloy has a very high phase fraction of austenite, e.g., about 0.9 or greater, over the desired operating temperature range without the detrimental delta ferrite material phase being present.


Referring to FIG. 5, a one-axis diagram of phase fraction of a stainless steel alloy is illustrated over a temperature range of from 600° C. to 1,600° C. The stainless steel alloy has compositions corresponding to the nominal values between the upper and lower limits shown above in TABLE 2 but with the exception that the Mn content is adjusted to 3.5%, which is just outside of the lower limit of 4.0%. As illustrated, the alpha ferrite phase is present at temperatures of from about 820° C. and lower, thereby narrowing the range in which alpha and delta ferrite phases are not present, specifically from about 820° C. to about 1,110° C., and a resulting lower phase fraction of austenite, e.g., about 0.9 or less at temperatures from about 820° C. to about 900° C. As such, lowering the Mn content of the stainless steel alloy below the lower limit of 4.0%, results in an alloy with a less stable austenite material phase at the lower end of the intended temperature range.


Referring to FIGS. 6A-6C, graphs 600, 602, and 604 illustrate the creep properties of two stainless steel alloys, specifically the exemplary stainless steel alloy 610 with a composition shown above in TABLE 2, and 1.4837 stainless steel 620 with a composition shown above in TABLE 1. Each of the graphs 600, 602, and 604 have a vertical axis illustrating stress measured in MPa on the stainless steel alloys and a horizontal axis illustrating Rupture Time measure in hours. Graph 600 illustrates the results of the creep testing on the stainless steel alloys conducted at 800° C., graph 602 illustrates the results of the creep testing on the stainless steel alloys conducted at 900° C., and graph 604 illustrates the results of the creep testing on the stainless steel alloys conducted at 1,000° C. As illustrated, the exemplary stainless steel alloy 610 showed better creep properties at 800° C. and 900° C. than the 1.4837 stainless steel 620, and was only modestly lower than 1.4837 stainless steel 620 at 1,000° C. As will be discussed in further detail below, however, increasing the Mn content of the exemplary stainless steel alloy 610 above the upper limit of 5.0% will result in a significant increase in oxidation of the steel alloy, which will have a detrimental effect on the creep properties of the exemplary stainless steel alloy 610, further decreasing the creep properties of the exemplary stainless steel alloy 610 significantly lower than 1.4837 stainless steel 620 at 1,000° C.


Referring to FIG. 7, graph 700 illustrates surface tension of the exemplary stainless steel alloy but with various manganese (Mn) and nitrogen (N) contents over a temperature range of from about 1,200° C. to 1,600° C. As illustrated, the stainless steel alloy having a Mn content of 5.5%, which is just outside of the upper limit of 5.0%, has a significantly lower surface tension than all the other stainless steel alloys with lower Mn content or varied N contents. The higher Mn content will translate to higher scraps rates for parts produced from the stainless steel alloy with a Mn content of 5.5% due to a significant increase in “sand burn” during the casting process. In particular, when casting relatively high-manganese steel alloys, silica from the sand casting mold can react with the steel alloy to form a low-melting-point manganese silicate, causing a “sand burn” issue. An example of a sand reaction is the reaction between silica (SiO2) and iron oxide (Wustite, FeO) to produce various iron silicates. This can cause the grains of the sand mold to fuse and collapse as they melt into each other, because the melting point of some of the silicates is below the casting temperature. The reacted grains adhere to the surface of the casting because of the presence of the low-melting-point liquid “glue.” This is known as “sand burn.” Thus, it is evident of the criticality of the upper limit on the Mn content of 5.0% to ensure the stainless steel alloy has good castability without significant “sand burn” issues.


Referring to FIG. 8, graph 800 illustrates oxidation of stainless steel alloys at 1,000° C. as a function of time. A vertical axis illustrates mass gain in mg/mm3, and a horizontal axis illustrates Time in minutes. Three stainless steel alloys where evaluated, specifically 1.4837 stainless steel 802 with a composition shown above in TABLE 1, the exemplary stainless steel alloy 804 with a composition shown above in TABLE 2, and the stainless steel alloy 806 with a composition shown above in TABLE 2 but with the exception that the Mn content has been adjusted to 8%. As illustrated, both the 1.4837 stainless steel 802 and the exemplary stainless steel alloy 804 have very comparable and excellent resistance to oxidation over prolong exposure to 1,000° C. However, the stainless steel alloy 806 show a significant increase in oxidation over prolonged exposure to 1,000° C. compared to the other two stainless steels 802 and 804. Thus, it is evident of the criticality of the upper limit on the Mn content of 5.0% to ensure the stainless steel alloy has excellent resistance to oxidation to ensure enhanced performance at its intended operating temperature range.


As such, embodiments of the present disclosure provide numerous benefits over the prior art, including the minimization of expensive nickel content, minimization or elimination of porosity formed during a casting process, while maintaining desirable material properties for use as turbocharger turbine components, such as housing components or exhaust components. Moreover, the disclosed alloys maintain a stable austenite material phase above the intended temperature of operation, such as 1,000° C., while substantially minimizing the detrimental phase of delta ferrite. Thus, embodiments of the present disclosure are suitable for use as a lower cost alloy for turbocharger turbine components, such as turbocharger turbine housing, for design operations of up to about 1,000° C.


While the best modes for carrying out the disclosure have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this disclosure relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the disclosure within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An austenitic stainless steel alloy, comprising, by weight: about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 2. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 22.3% to about 22.7% chromium.
  • 3. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 4.3% to about 4.7% nickel.
  • 4. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 4.3% to about 4.7% manganese.
  • 5. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 0.25% to about 0.35% molybdenum.
  • 6. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 0.8% to about 1.2% silicon.
  • 7. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 0.37% to about 0.43% carbon.
  • 8. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 0.22% to about 0.26% nitrogen.
  • 9. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 0.25% to about 0.35% niobium.
  • 10. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, consisting of, by weight: about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 11. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 1, comprising about 0.3% to about 0.5% copper.
  • 12. The austenitic stainless steel alloy of claim 11, consisting of, by weight: about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.3% to about 0.5% copper;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 13. A turbocharger turbine component comprising: an austenitic stainless steel alloy, wherein the austenitic stainless steel alloy comprises, by weight:about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 14. The turbocharger turbine component of claim 13, wherein the austenitic stainless steel alloy consists of, by weight: about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 15. The turbocharger turbine component of claim 13, wherein the austenitic stainless steel alloy comprises about 0.3% to about 0.5% copper.
  • 16. The turbocharger turbine component of claim 15, wherein the austenitic stainless steel alloy consists of, by weight: about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.3% to about 0.5% copper;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 17. The turbocharger turbine component of claim 13, wherein the turbocharger turbine component comprises a turbocharger turbine housing.
  • 18. A vehicle comprising the turbocharger turbine component of claim 13.
  • 19. A method of making a turbocharger turbine component comprising forming the turbocharger turbine component using an austenitic stainless steel alloy, wherein the austenitic stainless steel alloy comprises, by weight: about 22.0% to about 23.0% chromium;about 4.0% to about 5.0% nickel;about 4.0% to about 5.0% manganese;about 0.2% to about 0.4% molybdenum;about 0.2% to about 0.4% niobium;about 0.5% to about 1.5% silicon;about 0.35% to about 0.45% carbon;about 0.2% to about 0.28% nitrogen; anda balance of iron, and other inevitable/unavoidable impurities that are present in trace amounts, wherein phosphorus and sulfur are excluded from the alloy beyond impurity levels.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the austenitic stainless steel alloy comprises about 0.3% to about 0.5% copper.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
202411004989 Jan 2024 IN national