The present disclosure provides systems and methods useful for stall recovery for mud motors, including automated stall detection and recovery systems and methods. The systems and methods disclosed herein can be computer-implemented using processor executable instructions for execution on a processor and can accordingly be executed with a programmed computer system.
Drilling a borehole for the extraction of minerals has become an increasingly complicated operation due to the increased depth and complexity of many boreholes, including the complexity added by directional drilling, Drilling is an expensive operation and errors in drilling add to the cost and, in some cases, drilling errors may permanently lower the output of a well for years into the future. Conventional technologies and methods may not adequately address the complicated nature of drilling, and may not be capable of gathering and processing various information from downhole sensors and surface control systems in a timely manner, in order to improve drilling operations and minimize drilling errors.
In particular, when drilling using a mud motor, various issues can cause the mud motor to stall or become stuck, instead of rotating normally within an acceptable operating range. When the mud motor stalls, various delays or operator errors while responding to the stall may tail to prevent damage to the mud motor or other equipment, which is undesirable during drilling.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and its features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following description, details are set forth by way of example to facilitate discussion of the disclosed subject matter. It is noted, however, that the disclosed embodiments are exemplary and not exhaustive of all possible embodiments.
Throughout this disclosure, a hyphenated form of a reference numeral refers to a specific instance of an element and the un-hyphenated form of the reference numeral refers to the element generically or collectively. Thus, as an example (not shown in the drawings), device “12-1” refers to an instance of a device class, which may be referred to collectively as devices “12” and any one of which may be referred to generically as a device “12”. In the figures and the description, like numerals are intended to represent like elements.
Drilling a well typically involves a substantial amount of human decision-making during the drilling process. For example, geologists and drilling engineers use their knowledge, experience, and the available information to make decisions on how to plan the drilling operation, how to accomplish the drilling plan, and how to handle issues that arise during drilling. However, even the best geologists and drilling engineers perform some guesswork due to the unique nature, of each borehole. Furthermore, a directional human driller performing the drilling may have drilled other boreholes in the same region and so may have some similar experience. However, during drilling operations, a multitude of input information and other factors may affect a drilling decision being made by a human operator or specialist, such that the amount of information may overwhelm the cognitive ability of the human to properly consider and factor into the drilling decision. Furthermore, the quality or the error involved with the drilling decision may improve with larger amounts of input data being considered, for example, such as formation data from a large number of offset wells. For these reasons, human specialists may be unable to achieve desirable drilling decisions, particularly when such drilling decisions are made under time constraints, such as during drilling operations when continuation of drilling is dependent on the drilling decision and, thus, the entire drilling rig waits idly for the next drilling decision. Furthermore, human decision-making for drilling decisions can result in expensive mistakes, because drilling errors can add significant cost to drilling operations. In some cases, drilling errors may permanently lower the output of a well, resulting in substantial long term economic losses due to the lost output of the well.
Therefore, the well plan may be updated based on new stratigraphic information from the wellbore, as it is being drilled. This stratigraphic information can be gained on one hand from Measurement While Drilling (MWD) and Logging While Drilling, (LWD) sensor data, but could also include other reference well data, such as drilling dynamics data or sensor data giving information, for example, on the hardness of the rock in individual strata layers being drilled through.
A method for updating the well plan with additional stratigraphic data may first combine the various parameters into a single characteristic function, both for the subject well and every offset well. For every pair of subject well and offset: well, a heat map can be computed to display the misfit between the characteristic functions of the subject and offset wells. The heat maps may then enable the identification of paths (x(MD), y(MD)), parameterized by the measured depth (MD) along the subject well. These paths uniquely describe the vertical depth of the subject well relative to the geology (e.g., formation) at every offset well. Alternatively, the characteristic functions of the offset wells can be combined into a single characteristic function at the location of the subject wellbore. This combined characteristic function changes along the subject well with changes in the stratigraphy. The heat map may also be used to identify stratigraphic anomalies, such as structural faults, stringers and breccia. The identified paths may be used in updating the well plan with the latest data to steer the wellbore into the geological target(s) and keep the wellbore in the target zone.
Referring now to the drawings, Referring to
In
A mud pump 152 may direct a fluid mixture 153 (e.g., a mud mixture) from a mud pit 154 into drill string 146. Mud pit 154 is shown schematically as a container, but it is noted that various receptacles, tanks, pits, or other containers may be used. Mud 153 may flow from mud pump 152 into a discharge line 156 that is coupled to a rotary hose 158 by a standpipe 160. Rotary hose 158 may then be coupled to top drive 140, which includes a passage for mud 153 to flow into borehole 106 via drill string 146 from where mud 153 may emerge at drill bit 148. Mud 153 may lubricate drill bit 148 during drilling and, due to the pressure supplied by mud pump 152, mud 153 may return via borehole 106 to surface 104.
In drilling system 100, drilling equipment (see also
Sensing, detection, measurement, evaluation, storage, alarm, and other functionality may be incorporated into a downhole tool 166 or BHA 149 or elsewhere along drill string 146 to provide downhole surveys of borehole 106. Accordingly, downhole tool 166 may be an MWD tool or a LWD tool or both, and may accordingly utilize connectivity to the surface 104, local storage, or both. In different implementations, gamma radiation sensors, magnetometers, accelerometers, and other types of sensors may be used for the downhole surveys. Although downhole tool 166 is shown in singular in drilling system 100, it is noted that multiple instances (not shown) of downhole tool 166 may be located at one or more locations along drill string 146.
In some embodiments, formation detection and evaluation functionality may be provided via a steering control system 168 on the surface 104. Steering control system. 168 may be located in proximity to derrick 132 or may be included with drilling system 100. In other embodiments, steering control system 168 may be remote from the actual location of borehole 106 (see also
In operation, steering control system. 168 may be accessible via a communication network (see also
In particular embodiments, at least a portion of steering control system. 168 may be located in downhole tool 166 (not shown). In some embodiments, steering control system 168 may communicate with a separate controller (not shown) located in downhole tool 166. In particular, steering control system 168 may receive and process measurements received from downhole surveys, and may perform the calculations described herein for surface steering using the downhole surveys and other information referenced herein.
In drilling system 100, to aid in the drilling process, data is collected from borehole 106, such as from sensors in BHA 149, downhole tool 166, or both. The collected data may include the geological characteristics of formation 102 in which borehole 106 was formed, the attributes of drilling system 100, including BHA 149, and drilling information such as weight-on-bit (WOB), drilling speed, and other information pertinent to the formation of borehole 106. The drilling information may be associated with a particular depth or another identifiable marker to index collected data. For example, the collected data for borehole 106 may capture drilling information indicating that drilling of the well from 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet occurred at a first rate of penetration (ROP) through a first rock layer with a first WOB, while drilling from 1,200 feet to 1,500 feet occurred at a second ROP through a second rock layer with a second WOB (see also
The collected data may be stored in a database that is accessible via a communication network for example. In some embodiments, the database storing the collected data for borehole 106 may be located locally at drilling system 100, at a drilling hub that supports a plurality of drilling systems 100 in a region, or at a database server accessible over the communication network that provides access to the database (see also
In
Steering control system 168 may further be used as a surface steerable system, along with the database, as described above. The surface steerable system may enable an operator to plan and control drilling operations while drilling is being performed. The surface steerable system may itself also be used to perform certain drilling operations, such as controlling certain control systems that, in turn, control the actual equipment in drilling system 100 (see also
Manual control may involve direct control of the drilling rig equipment, albeit with certain safety limits to prevent unsafe or undesired actions or collisions of different equipment. To enable manual-assisted control, steering control system 168 may present various information, such as using a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed on a display device (see
To implement semi-automatic control, steering control system 168 may itself propose or indicate to the user, such as via the GUI, that a certain control operation, or a sequence of control operations, should be performed at a given time. Then, steering control system 168 may enable the user to imitate the indicated control operation or sequence of control operations, such that once manually started, the indicated control operation or sequence of control operations is automatically completed. The limits and safety features mentioned above for manual control would still apply for semi-automatic control. It is noted that steering control system 168 may execute semi-automatic control using a secondary processor, such as an embedded controller that executes under a real-time operating system (RTOS), that is under the control and command of steering control system 168. To implement automatic control, the step of manual starting the indicated control operation or sequence of operations is eliminated, and steering control system 168 may proceed with only a passive notification to the user of the actions taken.
In order to implement various control operations, steering control system 168 may perform (or may cause to be performed) various input operations, processing operations, and output operations. The input operations performed by steering control system 168 may result in measurements or other input information being made available for use in any subsequent operations, such as processing or output operations. The input operations may accordingly provide the input information, including feedback from the drilling, process itself, to steering control system 168. The processing operations performed by steering control system 168 may be any processing operation associated with surface steering, as disclosed herein. The output operations performed by steering control system 168 may involve generating output information for use by external entities, or for output to a user, such as in the form of updated elements in the GUI, for example. The output information may include at least some of the input information, enabling steering control system 168 to distribute information among various entities and processors.
In particular, the operations performed by steering control system 168 may include operations such as receiving drilling data representing a drill path, receiving other drilling parameters, calculating a drilling solution for the drill path based on the received data and other available data (e.g., rig characteristics), implementing the drilling solution at the drilling rig, monitoring the drilling process to gauge whether the drilling process is within a defined margin of error of the drill path, and calculating corrections for the drilling process if the drilling process is outside of the margin of error.
Accordingly, steering control system 168 may receive input information either before drilling, during drilling, or after drilling of borehole 106. The input information may comprise measurements from one or more sensors, as well as survey information collected while drilling borehole 106. The input information may also include a well plan, a regional formation history, drilling engineer parameters, downhole tool face/inclination information, downhole tool gamma/resistivity information, economic parameters, reliability parameters, among various other parameters. Some of the input information, such as the regional formation history, may be available from a drilling hub 410, Which may have respective access to a regional drilling database (DB) 412 (see
As noted, the input information may be provided to steering control system 168. After processing by steering control system 168, steering control system 168 may generate control information that may be output to drilling rig 210 (e.g., to rig controls 520 that control drilling equipment 530, see also
Referring now to
In drilling environment 200, it may be assumed that a drilling plan (also referred to as a well plan) has been formulated to drill borehole 106 extending into the ground to a true vertical depth (TVD) 266 and penetrating several subterranean strata layers. Borehole 106 is shown in
Also visible in
Current drilling operations frequently include directional drilling to reach a target, such as target area 280. The use of directional drilling has been found to generally increase an overall amount of production volume per well, but also may lead to significantly higher production rates per well, which are both economically desirable. As shown in
Referring now to
The build rate used for any given build up section may depend on various factors, such as properties of the formation (i.e., strata layers) through which borehole 106 is to be drilled, the trajectory of borehole 106, the particular pipe and drill collars/BHA components used (e.g., length, diameter, flexibility, strength, mud motor bend setting, and drill bit), the mud type and flow rate, the specified horizontal displacement, stabilization, and inclination, among other factors. An overly aggressive build rate can cause problems such as severe doglegs (e.g., sharp changes in direction in the borehole) that may make it difficult or impossible to run easing or perform other operations in borehole 106. Depending on the severity of any mistakes made during directional drilling, borehole 106 may be enlarged or drill bit 146 may be backed out of a portion of borehole 106 and redrilled along a different path. Such mistakes may be undesirable due to the additional time and expense involved. However, if the build rate is too cautious, additional overall time may be added to the drilling process, because directional drilling generally involves a lower ROP than straight drilling. Furthermore, directional drilling for a curve is more complicated than vertical drilling and the possibility of drilling errors increases with directional drilling (e.g., overshoot and undershoot that may occur while trying to keep drill bit 148 on the planned trajectory).
Two modes of drilling, referred to herein as “rotating” and “sliding”, are commonly used to form borehole 106. Rotating, also called “rotary drilling”, uses top drive 140 or rotary table 162 to rotate drill string 146. Rotating may be used when drilling occurs along a straight trajectory, such as for vertical portion 310 of borehole 106. Sliding, also called “steering” or “directional drilling” as noted above, typically uses a mud motor located downhole at BHA 149. The mud motor may have an adjustable bent housing and is not powered by rotation of the drill string. Instead, the mud motor uses hydraulic power derived from the pressurized drilling mud that circulates along borehole 106 to and from the surface 104 to directionally drill borehole 106 in build up section 316.
Thus, sliding is used in order to control the direction of the well trajectory during directional drilling. A method to perform a slide may include the following operations. First, during vertical or straight drilling, the rotation of drill string 146 is stopped. Based on feedback from measuring equipment, such as from downhole tool 166, adjustments may be made to drill string 146, such as using top drive 140 to apply various combinations of torque, WOB, and vibration, among other adjustments. The adjustments may continue until a tool face is confirmed that indicates a direction of the bend of the mud motor is oriented to a direction of a desired deviation (i.e., build rate) of borehole 106, Once the desired orientation of the mud motor is attained, WOB to the drill bit is increased, which causes the drill bit to move in the desired direction of deviation. Once sufficient distance and angle have been built up in the curved trajectory, a transition back to rotating mode can be accomplished by rotating the drill string again. The rotation of the drill string after sliding may neutralize the directional deviation caused by the bend in the mud motor due to the continuous rotation around a centerline of borehole 106.
Referring now to
Specifically, in a region 401-1, a drilling hub 410-1 may serve as a remote processing resource for drilling rigs 210 located in region 401-1, which may vary in number and are not limited to the exemplary schematic illustration of
In
Also shown in
In
In some embodiments, the formulation of a drilling plan for drilling rig 210 may include processing and analyzing the collected data in regional drilling DB 412 to create a more effective drilling plan. Furthermore, once the drilling has begun, the collected data may be used in conjunction with current data from drilling rig 210 to improve drilling decisions. As noted, the functionality of steering control system 168 may be provided at drilling rig 210, Or may be provided, at least in part, at a remote processing resource, such as drilling hub 410 or central command 414.
As noted, steering control system 168 may provide functionality as a surface steerable system for controlling drilling rig 210. Steering control system 168 may have access to regional drilling DB 412 and central drilling DB 416 to provide the surface steerable system functionality. As will be described in greater detail below, steering control system 168 may, be used to plan and control drilling operations based on input information, including feedback from the drilling process itself. Steering control system 168 may be used to perform operations such as receiving drilling data representing a drill trajectory and other drilling parameters, calculating a drilling solution for the drill trajectory based on the received data and other available data (e.g., rig characteristics), implementing the drilling solution at drilling rig 210, monitoring the drilling process to gauge whether the drilling process is within a margin of error that is defined for the drill trajectory, or calculating corrections for the drilling process if the drilling process is outside of the margin of error.
Referring now to
Steering control system 168 represent an instance of a processor having an accessible memory storing instructions executable by the processor, such as an instance of controller 1000 shown in
In rig control systems 500 of
In rig control systems 500, autodriller 510 may represent an automated rotary drilling system and may be used for controlling rotary drilling. Accordingly, autodriller 510 may enable automate operation of rig controls 520 during rotary drilling, as indicated in the well plan. Bit guidance 512 may represent an automated control system to monitor and control performance and operation drilling bit 148.
In rig control systems 500, autoslide 514 may represent an automated slide drilling system and may be used for controlling slide drilling. Accordingly, autoslide 514 may enable automate operation of rig controls 521 during a slide, and may return control to steering control system 168 for rotary drilling at an appropriate time, as indicated in the well plan. In particular implementations, autoslide 514 may be enabled to provide a user interface during slide drilling to specifically monitor and control the slide. For example, autoslide 514 may rely on bit guidance 512 for orienting a tool face and on autodriller 510 to set WOB or control rotation or vibration of drill string 146.
Steering control process 700 in
It is noted that in some implementations, at least certain portions of steering control process 700 may be automated or performed without user intervention, such as using rig control systems 700 (see
Referring to
As shown in
In
In
In
In user interface 850, circular chart 886 may also be color coded, with the color coding existing in a band 890 around circular chart 886 or positioned or represented in other ways. The color coding may use colors to indicate activity in a certain direction. For example, the color red may indicate the highest level of activity, while the color blue may indicate the lowest level of activity. Furthermore, the arc range in degrees of a color may indicate the amount of deviation. Accordingly, a relatively narrow (e.g., thirty degrees) arc of red with a relatively broad (e.g., three hundred degrees) arc of blue may indicate that most activity is occurring in a particular tool face orientation with little deviation. As shown in user interface 850, the color blue may extend from approximately 22-337 degrees, the color green may extend from approximately 15-22 degrees and 337-345 degrees, the color yellow may extend a few degrees around the 13 and 345 degree marks, while the color red may extend from approximately 347-10 degrees. Transition colors or shades may be used with, for example, the color orange marking the transition between red and yellow or a light blue marking the transition between blue and green. This color coding may enable user interface 850 to provide an intuitive summary of how narrow the standard deviation is and how much of the energy intensity is being expended in the proper direction. Furthermore, the center of energy may be viewed relative to the target. For example, user interface 850 may clearly show that the target is at 90 degrees but the center of energy is at 45 degrees.
In user interlace 850, other indicators, such as a slide indicator 892, may indicate bow much time remains until a slide occurs or how much time remains for a current slide. For example, slide indicator 892 may represent a time, a percentage (e.g., as shown, a current slide may be 56% complete), a distance completed, or a distance remaining. Slide indicator 892 may graphically display information using, for example, a colored bar 893 that increases or decreases with slide progress. In some embodiments, slide indicator 892 may be built into circular chart 886 (e.g., around the outer edge with an increasing/decreasing band), while in other embodiments slide indicator 892 may be a separate indicator such as a meter, a bar, a gauge, or another indicator type. In various implementations, slide indicator 892 may be refreshed by autoslide 514.
In user interface 850, an error indicator 894 may indicate a magnitude and a direction of error. For example, error indicator 894 may indicate that an estimated drill bit position is a certain distance from the planned trajectory, with a location of error indicator 894 around the circular chart 886 representing the heading. For example,
It is noted that user interface 850 may be arranged in many different ways. For example, colors may be used to indicate normal operation, warnings, and problems. In such cases, the numerical indicators may display numbers in one color (e.g., green) for normal operation, may use another color (e.g., yellow) for warnings, and may use yet another color (e.g., red) when a serious problem occurs. The indicators may also flash or otherwise indicate an alert. The gauge indicators may include colors (e.g., green, yellow, and red) to indicate operational conditions and may also indicate the target value (e.g., an ROP of 100 feet/hour). For example, ROP indicator 868 may have a green bar to indicate a normal level of operation (e.g., from 10-300 feet/hour), a yellow bar to indicate a warning level of operation (e.g., from 300-360 feet/hour), and a red bar to indicate a dangerous or otherwise out of parameter level of operation (e.g., from 360-390 feet/hour). ROP indicator 868 may also display a marker at 100 feet/hour to indicate the desired target ROP.
Furthermore, the use of numeric indicators, gauges, and similar visual display indicators may be varied based on factors such as the information to be conveyed and the personal preference of the viewer. Accordingly, user interface 850 may provide a customizable view of various drilling processes and information for a particular individual involved in the drilling process. For example, steering control system 168 may enable a user to customize the user interface 850 as desired, although certain features (e.g., standpipe pressure) may be locked to prevent a user from intentionally or accidentally removing important drilling information from user interface 850. Other features and attributes of user interface 850 may be set by user preference. Accordingly, the level of customization and the information shown by the user interface 850 may be controlled based on who is viewing user interface 850 and their role in the drilling process.
Referring to
In
In
In
In
In
Traditionally, deviation from the slide would be predicted by a human operator based on experience. The operator would, for example, use a long slide cycle to assess what likely was accomplished during the last slide. However, the results are generally not confirmed until the downhole survey sensor point passes the slide portion of the borehole, often resulting in a response lag defined by a distance of the sensor point from the drill bit tip (e.g., approximately 50 feet). Such a response lag may introduce inefficiencies in the slide cycles due to over/under correction of the actual trajectory relative to the planned trajectory.
In GCL 900, using slide estimator 908, each tool face update may be algorithmically merged with the average differential pressure of the period between the previous and current tool face readings, as well as the MD change during this period to predict the direction, angular deviation, and MD progress during the period. As an example, the periodic rate may be between 10 and 60 seconds per cycle depending on the tool face update rate of downhole tool 166. With a more accurate estimation of the slide effectiveness, the sliding efficiency can be improved. The output of slide estimator 908 may accordingly be periodically provided to borehole estimator 906 for accumulation of well deviation information, as well to geo modified well planner 904. Some or all of the output of the slide estimator 908 may be output to an operator, such as shown in the user interface 850 of
In
In
In
In
In
In
Other functionality may be provided by GCL 900 in additional modules or added to an existing module. For example, there is a relationship between the rotational position of the drill pipe on the surface and the orientation of the downhole tool face. Accordingly, GCL 900 may receive information corresponding to the rotational position of the drill pipe on the surface. GCL 900 may use this surface positional information to calculate current and desired tool face orientations. These calculations may then be used to define control parameters for adjusting the top drive 140 to accomplish adjustments to the downhole tool face in order to steer the trajectory of borehole 106.
For purposes of example, an object-oriented software approach may be utilized to provide a class-based structure that may be used with GCL 900 or other functionality provided by steering control system 168. In GCL 900, a drilling model class may be defined to capture and define the drilling state throughout the drilling process. The drilling model class may include information obtained without delay. The drilling model class may be based on the following components and sub-models: a drill bit model, a borehole model, a rig surface gear model, a mud pump model, a WOB/differential pressure model, a positional/rotary model, an MSE model, an active well plan, and control limits. The drilling model class may produce a control output solution and may be executed via a main processing loop that rotates through the various modules of GCL 900. The drill bit model may represent the current position and state of drill bit 148. The drill bit model may include a three dimensional (3D) position, a drill bit trajectory, BHA information, bit speed, and tool face (e.g., orientation information). The 3D position may be specified in north-south (NS), east-west (EW), and true vertical depth (TVD). The drill bit trajectory may be specified as an inclination angle and an azimuth angle. The BHA information may be a set of dimensions defining the active BHA. The borehole model may represent the current path and size of the active borehole. The borehole model may include hole depth information, an array of survey points collected along the borehole path, a gamma log, and borehole diameters. The hole depth information is for current drilling of borehole 106, The borehole diameters may represent the diameters of borehole 106 as drilled over current drilling. The rig surface gear model may represent pipe length, block height, and other models, such as the mud pump model, WOB/differential pressure model, positional/rotary model, and MSE model. The mud pump model represents mud pump equipment and includes flow rate, standpipe pressure, and differential pressure. The WOB/differential pressure model represents draw works or other WOB/differential pressure controls and parameters, including, WOB. The positional/rotary model represents top drive or other positional/rotary controls and parameters including rotary RPM and spindle position. The active well plan represents the target borehole path and may include an external well plan and a modified well plan. The control limits represent defined parameters that may be set as maximums and/or minimums. For example, control limits may be set for the rotary RPM in the top drive model to limit the maximum RPMS to the defined level. The control output solution may represent the control parameters for drilling rig 210.
Each functional module of GCL 900 may have behavior encapsulated within a respective class definition. During a processing window, the individual functional modules may have an exclusive portion in time to execute and update the drilling model. For purposes of example, the processing order for the functional modules may be in the sequence of geo modified well planner 904, build rate predictor 902, slide estimator 908, borehole estimator 906, error vector calculator 910, slide planner 914, convergence planner 916, geological drift estimator 912, and tactical solution planner 918. It is noted that other sequences may be used in different implementations.
In
Referring now to
In the embodiment depicted in
Controller 1000, as depicted in
Controller 1000 is shown in
In
In other embodiments, automated stall recovery for mud motors may be implemented using steering control system 168, as described herein. The automated stall recovery, also referred to herein as “stall assist”, may enable various degrees of automation in responding to a mud motor stall that can be configured by a user of steering control system 168, for example. Accordingly, a user interface that is used during drilling, such as user interface 850, may enable activation and configuration of the automated stall recovery, as described in further detail below.
When a mud motor experiences a stall during operation, certain components of the mud motor may become damaged or excessively worn, which is undesirable due to the resulting shortened service life of the mud motor. When the bit torque that turns the bit in the mud motor to cut the formation creates a higher differential pressure than an internal seal of the mud motor (e.g., a power section seal between the rotor and the stator) can maintain, the internal seal may fail under the increased pressure. As a result, the drilling fluid may penetrate the internal seal and may leak through the mud motor without turning the rotor. As the bit ceases rotation or “stalls”, the mud motor becomes stalled. When the mud motor stalls, a fast increase in the differential pressure will occur and ROP will diminish to zero. Furthermore, as the drilling fluid leaks past the internal seal, the drilling fluid may erode an elastomer from which the stator is formed, which may lead to further leaks and stalling behavior, and may eventually lead to the stator becoming damaged. Because of the relatively high pressures in the downhole environment, among other factors, the damage to the mud motor components during a mud motor stall, such as chunking of the stator, can occur quickly when a stall occurs. The large pressure pulses generated as a result of the mud motor stalling may, in turn, lead to large and essentially instantaneous torque spikes that can cause stator chunking, connection back-off, fracture of driveline components, or various combinations thereof. The pressure spikes in the mud equipment (e.g., mud pumping equipment 536) can blow pop-off valves, causing further delays and remediation effort to resume drilling.
Although mud motor stalling is a known concern and precautions may be taken to avoid mud motor stalling when drilling using steering control system 168, mud motor stalling may occur nonetheless, such as due to unforeseen drilling situations or environments. When mud motor stalling does occur, a proper and timely detection and remediation of the stall condition is highly desirable to avoid adverse results. For example, if the mud motor bit is picked up off-bottom while drilling, the trapped torque within drill string 146 may become released uncontrollably, which may potentially cause damage to downhole components or cause connections to back off, which are undesirable outcomes during drilling.
Accordingly, in order to respond to a stalled mud motor during drilling of a well, certain recommended practices have been formulated for operators of drilling rigs. The actions performed in response to detecting a stalled mud motor may involve a particular sequence of actions. At the first sign of a stalled mud motor, if drill string 146 is being rotated by top drive 140, rotation should be stopped. Then, a mud system may stop mud pumping. Any residual (or ‘trapped’) torque in drill string 146 is released.
After the residual torque has been released from the drill string 146, the drill string 146 may be raised, in order to completely disengage the bit and mud motor from the formation. Once drill string 146 has been raised sufficiently off-bottom, the procedure to resume drilling operations may be initiated.
The stall response procedure outlined above is typically performed by the rig crew, such as by the toolpusher and the driller, and may be specified as operational requirements for the drilling rig. The stall response procedure may further specify certain actions to be avoided under any circumstances, such as initiating mud circulation by mud pumping equipment 536 while the mud motor is on-bottom and the bit is engaged with the formation, or rotating the drill string continuously while mud pumping equipment 536 is stopped.
It has been observed that drilling and directional drilling can comprise complex operations during which a multitude of information and variables are subject to monitoring and interpretation. As disclosed herein, steering control system 168 provides various functionality to perform monitoring, interpretation, and/or control of drilling operations. As will be disclosed in further detail below, steering control system 168 may further comprise functionality for stall detection and recovery for mud motors. The stall detection and recovery for mud motors disclosed herein may provide a greater benefit and more advantages than simply automating routine tasks in software that were previously performed manually. Specifically, the stall detection and recovery for mud motors disclosed herein may be enabled to detect a motor stall with greater accuracy and within a shorter detection time than the rig crew could manually detect, which may help in avoiding false positives, false negatives, and undesirable delays typical in manual detection that can cause further damage to equipment. Furthermore, the stall detection and recovery for mud motors disclosed herein may be enabled to automatically react to the detected motor stall by immediately taking corrective actions for remediation of the motor stall. Again, such a reaction by steering control system 168 (implementing the stall detection and recovery for mud motors) can provide a greater benefit and more advantages than simply automating routine tasks in software that were previously performed manually, because steering control system 168 can be programmed to respond faster and with fewer potential errors in judgement or execution of control commands than a human rig crew, which may significantly reduce the risks of damage to the mud motor after a motor stall occurs. Also, the stall detection and recovery for mud motors disclosed herein may be, configured for various degrees of manual control and intervention, either for detecting the motor stall or for responding to the motor stall, which may be independently configurable from each other.
As noted, the stall detection and recovery for mud motors disclosed herein may enable steering control system 168 to aid in quick detection and remediation of mud motor stalls while drilling. The on-bottom drilling may include rotation of drill string 146 or may be slide drilling without rotation. The automated stall recovery for mud motors disclosed herein may be implemented as a “stall assist” feature that augments the functionality of steering control system. 168, for example, by adding certain display or control elements to user interface 850 (see also
In some embodiments, indications or an analysis of the drilling, such as related to monitoring the differential pressure, may be used to determine a likelihood of a motor stall or to predict a motor stall in advance. Specifically, steering control system 168 implementing stall assist may also be programmed to predict a stall before it occurs. Data regarding the mud motor, including its maximum pressure rating, may be provided by an operator, and in addition, data regarding the formations to be drilled according to the drill plan, as well as data regarding stalls that have occurred earlier during drilling of the same well and/or other wells, can be provided and used by steering control system 168. Such data may include data regarding a variety of drilling parameters, including weight on bit, rate of penetration, differential pressure, flow rates for drilling mud, and so forth, wherein each of the data points regarding such parameters correspond to one another, either by time or by location within a wellbore. The data may be stored in a separate database accessible by steering control system 168. Steering control system 168 can be programmed to compare the current values for a plurality of drilling parameters (e.g., DP, ROP, WOB, mud flow rates, etc.), as well as data regarding the mud motor and/or BHA (e.g., manufacturer's pressure rating), to the database of data for drilling parameters associated with an earlier mud motor stall to determine if the difference between the current values during drilling of a wellbore and the data values for some or all of the same parameters that are associated with an earlier stall fall within a threshold (or one or more thresholds), if such a threshold determination is positive, then steering control system 168 may automatically generate a signal indicating that a stall may be imminent (such as a visual alert on a display, an audible alarm, an email or text message, or the like). In other instances, steering control system 168 may take other appropriate action, which may include sending one or more control signals to one or more control systems of the drilling rig, such as to change drilling parameters like ROP, WOB, DP, mud flow rates, etc. to try to prevent a stall from happening, to minimize the effects of the potential stall, and/or to recover from a stall as described in this disclosure. The database may, for example, comprise a lookup table, such that steering control system 168 obtains the data values in the table that correspond to one or more recently measured values for DP and, from such data values and from outcome data associated with such values or from comparing some or all of them to one or more thresholds, determines whether the likelihood of a stall is high enough that an indication of an imminent stall is appropriate.
Referring now to
Method 1100 may begin at step 1102 by detecting a stall condition in a mud motor during drilling, based at least in part on a differential pressure of drilling mud. It is noted that steering control system 168 may be enabled to monitor the differential pressure and detect the stall condition in a shorter time and with greater certainty than a human operator. For example, the following conditions may be used by steering control system 168 to detect the motor stall, such as when threshold conditions are met by differential pressure values such as:
Although the above threshold conditions have used changes or transients in differential pressure to detect a mud motor stall, the detection may be performed using other input values, such as one or more drilling parameters. It is rioted that, when a mud motor stall occurs, ROP drops to zero and such a measurement value may also be used in conjunction with the differential pressure. For example, a secondary condition to confirm that ROP is below a minimum threshold value may also be used to detect, or to confirm detection of the mud motor stall. As an another example, one or more additional thresholds may be established using a combination of differential pressure and ROP (or other drilling parameters) and used in addition to the two threshold examples provided above with respect to differential pressure. For example, it may be that the differential pressure has not increased sufficiently in value or in rate of change to exceed one of the two thresholds mentioned above, yet it may be that the increase in differential pressure, when taken together with a decrease in the ROP or a rate of change in the ROP, is nonetheless indicative of a stall, or may indicate an impending stall.
In method 1100, at step 1104, if rotating a drill string, a top drive is controlled to stop rotation of drill string 146 without delay. If not rotating drill string 146 (e.g., slide drilling), step 1104 may be omitted. Step 1104 may involve controlling top drive 140 to stop rotation of drill string 146 in a deliberate and smooth manner, yet without delay. Because steering control system 168 can react within a much smaller delay than the rig crew, step 1104 may result in stopping drilling faster than the human operator can react to. In particular embodiments, the rotation of top drive 140 may be stopped without applying a friction brake, but rather, the rotation may be slowed in a gradual and controlled manner to a stop, yet without delay, using an electric motor brake or controlling the top drive motor accordingly. In this manner, the rate at which top drive 140 is stopped may be faster than a standard control system would stop top drive 140, such as when the driller normally turns off rotation, for example. At step 1106, mud pumping is controlled to stop mud pumping without delay. Because steering control system 168 can react within a much smaller delay than the human rig crew, step 1106 may result in stopping mud pumping equipment 536 faster than the human operator can react to, including reducing the standpipe pressure. At step 1108, the mud is bled out to reduce mud pressure. Step 1108 may be performed using a control valve in mud pumping equipment 536. In some embodiments, step 1108 is performed by receiving an instruction to mud pumping equipment 536, which is equipped with a diaphragm-type pulsation dampener with hydraulic oil therein and an associated control valve in fluid communication with the standpipe. The mud pressure within the hydraulic side of the pulsation dampener would be released in a controlled manner, allowing mud from the standpipe to enter the pulsation dampener and relieve the residual pressure on the standpipe. After relief of the pressure, the pulsation dampener may then be refilled with hydraulic oil and can be used for the next pressure relief request.
At step 1110, any trapped torque in drill string 146 is gradually released. For example, steering control system 168 may be enabled to release the trapped torque over a desired minimum time period, such as by controllably unwinding drill string 146 (by controlling top drive 140), in order to release the trapped torque in a controlled and gradual manner to avoid damaging other drill string components. Steering control system may control the release of any residual torque by unwinding, drill string 146 at a predetermined rate or for a predetermined time in a direction opposite to the measured residual torque, and may cease unwinding drill string 146 once the measured torque value reaches zero and/or remains below a predetermined threshold value for a predetermined time period, for example.
At step 1112, drill string 146 is hoisted off bottom using a lifting force within a predetermined overpull limit. Other parameters for hoisting drill string 146 may also be provided as user input to steering control system 168 to perform step 1112, such as a hoist distance and a hoist velocity. Steering control system 168 may be enabled to hoist drill string 146 off-bottom for various depths and may automatically accommodate different lengths and weights of drill string 146, while the overpull limit may be a parameter that is user-specified. After drill string 146 is off bottom, drilling with the mud motor can resume. At step 1114, mud pumping is controlled to restart mud pumping. At step 1116, if rotation was used then the rotation is restarted, and drilling resumes. At step 1116, various procedures may be performed to resume drilling with the mud motor on-bottom, such as resuming rotary drilling or toolface alignment, among others.
Referring now to
In
In
In
In
Based on the configurational functionality shown in exemplary
It will be understood that the above classifications are exemplary and non-limiting, and may be variously grouped for different functionality in other embodiments. For example, various specific parameters associated with the stall assist function may be added to the user interfaces shown in
Additionally, other safeguards to prevent undesired or improper pressure from being applied to the mud motor may be employed, such as constraining user inputs for controlling pressure such that a user input greater than the specified pressure rating for the mud motor cannot be entered into the user interface by the user, and so cannot be applied by steering control system 168. In some implementations, additional text may be displayed near a stall assist activation button that advises the user about events that are occurring during a stall or during handling of a stall by the auto stall functionality. In some cases, the number of stalls that have occurred during drilling of a well, or a portion of a well, may be shown as a separate stall counter. Various different visual, audible, and electronic (e.g., text, email, etc.) alerts or alarms may also be generated for stall assist, such as a general alarm when a stall is detected.
Additional or different constraints may also be applied to the stall detection threshold conditions used to detect a mud motor stall. For example, the stall threshold differential pressure value may be specified as at least 2.0% larger than the maximum differential pressure that the mud motor is rated at, and conversely the maximum differential pressure may be specified to be greater than 80% of the stall threshold differential pressure value.
When a user of steering control system 168 inputs a differential pressure setpoint, the auto stall function may consider an available pressure margin before a maximum liner/casing rating pressure is reached. If the maximum liner/casing rating pressure is smaller than the maximum rated differential pressure of the mud motor, then the autodriller can be limited to the smaller value and the entry for maximum motor differential pressure may be shown turn red, indicating that the maximum input value is not available. For the stall threshold differential pressure, the standpipe rating can applied, and the minimum of 20% separation can still be enforced. For example, if the input stall threshold differential pressure is not available, the displayed stall threshold differential pressure value may turn red. The pressure limit setting may also be used to determine which maximum differential pressure set point is available to the autodriller.
The above disclosed subject matter is to be considered illustrative, and not restrictive, and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, enhancements, and other embodiments which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, to the maximum extent allowed by law, the scope of the present disclosure is to be determined by the broadest permissible interpretation of the following claims and their equivalents, and shall not be restricted or limited by the foregoing detailed description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1011985 | Mickelsen | Dec 1911 | A |
1013871 | Ellis et al. | Jan 1912 | A |
2742265 | Snyder | Apr 1956 | A |
4676310 | Scherbatskoy et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4794534 | Millheim | Dec 1988 | A |
5193628 | Hill, III et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5220963 | Patton | Jun 1993 | A |
5812068 | Wisler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857531 | Estep et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6088294 | Leggett, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6233524 | Harrell et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257356 | Wassell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272434 | Wisler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279702 | Koh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6408953 | Goldman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424919 | Moran et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470977 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523623 | Schuh | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6577954 | Alft et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581699 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601658 | Downton | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612382 | King | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6732052 | Macdonald et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6968909 | Aldred et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7000710 | Umbach | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003439 | Aldred et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011156 | Von Gynz-Rekowski | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032689 | Goldman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054750 | Rodney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073582 | Connell et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085696 | King | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7136795 | Downton | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142986 | Moran | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7191850 | Williams | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7342504 | Crane et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7357196 | Goldman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359844 | Sung et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7460957 | Prange et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7546209 | Williams | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7606666 | Repin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7650241 | Jogi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653563 | Veeningen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7684929 | Prange et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7725263 | Sugiura | May 2010 | B2 |
7802634 | Boone | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7823655 | Boone et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860593 | Boone | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7861800 | Chapman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873476 | Thorne | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7938197 | Boone et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945488 | Karr et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957946 | Pirovolou | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8010290 | Illfelder | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8061440 | Chapman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8261856 | Stacy, II et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8274399 | Strachan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8278931 | Fang et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8360171 | Boone et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8463549 | Selman et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8463550 | Selman et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489375 | Omeragic et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8510081 | Boone et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528663 | Boone | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8577660 | Wendt et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8614713 | Selman et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8615363 | Aamodt et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8686996 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8768627 | Paulk | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8818779 | Sadlier et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875806 | Williams | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8939233 | Edbury et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8960326 | Williams | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965703 | Prakash et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9022140 | Marx et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041547 | Hartmann | May 2015 | B2 |
9091140 | Selman et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9097096 | Selman et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9103192 | Yang | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9182517 | Selman et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9223041 | Wendt et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9238960 | Benson et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9267341 | Reddy | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9322261 | Selman et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9334723 | Yang | May 2016 | B2 |
9349212 | Cheung et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9528366 | Selman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528367 | Selman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528372 | Selman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9549854 | Crespo | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9556728 | De Reynal, Jr. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9598949 | Selman et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9599742 | Selman et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9702240 | Bittar et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720131 | Zhuo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9879490 | Edbury | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10036678 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10119385 | Williams | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10138721 | Veltman | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10151192 | Burress et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10215010 | Hadi et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10378329 | Boone | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10533409 | Benson et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10584574 | Benson et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10672154 | Gillen et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20010042642 | King | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054514 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020070050 | Wassell | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103630 | Aldred et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139581 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030024738 | Schuh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040168811 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006145 | Downton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050150689 | Jogi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194130 | Best et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194185 | Gleitman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050269082 | Baron et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060074561 | Xia et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060151214 | Prange et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070163810 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070221375 | Baron et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080172272 | Back et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080230272 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080271925 | Misselbrook et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000823 | Pirovolou | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076873 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090090555 | Boone et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120690 | Phillips | May 2009 | A1 |
20100139977 | Watkins et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175922 | Ignova et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191516 | Benish et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100252327 | Beuershausen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259415 | Strachan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110024191 | Boone | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110067928 | Hulden et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110153300 | Holl et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110186353 | Turner et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213601 | Pirovolou | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120024606 | Pirovolou et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120027516 | Day et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048621 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120285701 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130032401 | Edbury et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130032402 | Byreddy et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130092441 | Hummes et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130112484 | Chen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126239 | Panchal et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130140037 | Sequeira, Jr. et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130161096 | Benson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130238306 | Lagenwalter et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262048 | Tang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340999 | Benson | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20150107899 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150218914 | Marx et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150267525 | May et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160076357 | Hbaieb | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160370480 | Shetty et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170037722 | Jeffryes et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170152739 | Benson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170183952 | Williams | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180003839 | Lowell et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180068037 | Williams | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073351 | Benson et al. | Mar 2018 | A9 |
20180135402 | Jeffryes | May 2018 | A1 |
20180171773 | Nessjoen et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180179823 | Spatz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180179831 | Spatz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180258750 | Hadi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180283156 | Viens | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283157 | Hadi et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180340406 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340407 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180343040 | Luzinski et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180371889 | Hohl et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190040697 | Barker | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190048706 | Benson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190048707 | Benson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190120013 | Gay | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190323335 | Ocegueda-Hernandez | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200095836 | Palmer | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2236782 | Apr 1991 | GB |
2009039448 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2016102381 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2018144169 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018152636 | Aug 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Duplantis, Steven, “Slide Drilling-Farther and Faster,” Oilfield Review; May 2016; p. 50-56. |
Cougar Drilling Solutions “Motor Operations Handbook,” Version 5.0; 2012. |
“Cougar DS Motor Operations”, Cougar Drilling Solutions, 1 page. |
“Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus—The Free Dictionary”, Available Online at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/, Accessed from Internet on Oct. 1, 2020, 6 pages. |
“Drilling Performance Daily Report”, Paloma Operating, H&P 493, Oct. 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
“Jagged Peak Motor Stall Procedure”, 1 page. |
“Motor Operations Handbook”, Cougar Drilling Solution, Cougar DS Motor Operations, Version 5.0, 2012, 179 pages. |
“Motor Stall Detection”, Pason, EDR 19.7, 1 page. |
“SLB Mud Motor Stall Procedure”, Schlumberger, 1 page. |
“Stalled Motor Protocol”, Pioneer Natural Resouices, 4 pages. |
“The Oilfield Glossary—Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary”, Available Online at https://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/, Accessed from Internet on Oct. 1, 2020, 1 page. |
“What is a Mud Motor Stall?”, Apache, Dec. 2018, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,161, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Mar. 5, 2019, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,161, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/132,256, “Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 11, 2019, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/132,256, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/132,256, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Aug. 26, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/591,387, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jul. 1, 2020, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/774,528, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 25, 2020, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/774,528, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Nov. 12, 2020, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/774,528, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Oct. 5, 2020, 5 pages. |
Duplantis, et al., “Slide Drilling—Farther and Faster”, Oilfield Review, vol. 28, No. 2, May 2016, pp. 50-56. |
Pastusek, et al., “A Fundamental Model for Prediction of Hole Curvature and Build Rates With Steerable Bollomhole Assemblies”, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibit, 2005, 7 pages. |
PCT/US2013/047054, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 10 pages. |
PCT/US2013/047054, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Jun. 25, 2014, 12 pages. |
Saputelli, et al., “Real-Time Decision-Making for Value Creation While Drilling”, SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 22-23, 2003, pp. 1-19. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200362687 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |