The present disclosure relates to a die trim assembly with a recess adapted to retain slugs in a stamping process, and a related method for retaining slugs in a stamping process. More specifically, the present disclosure describes an improved stamping die trim assembly that retains a slug within the die trim insert after it has been blanked, and describes an improved method for retaining a slug within a die trim insert.
Stamping is a form of metalworking that uses a trim punch and a die trim section to perforate holes or shapes in a part, or blanks out a part using trim punches. The material is placed over a die trim opening and the trim punch is rapidly pushed through the material and into the die trim profile opening. A slug is stamped from the material. When stamping materials with a trim punch and a die, loose slugs can be tilted or pulled up and into the working area of a stamping die by the extraction stroke of the trim punch. This can cause the in-feeding material to jam, which can cause damage to the parts being made. Additionally, a slug that is pulled into the working area of the stamping die can damage or break the die tooling, which is expensive to repair or replace.
To prevent slugs from being pulled up by the retracting trim punch, it is known to form a recess or groove in the sidewall of the die trim opening. It is also known to modify the cutting edge of a die trim opening by machining grooves across a top surface of the die trim insert or by creating irregularities on the cutting edge of the die trim opening.
Kramski U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,865 discloses forming a uniform longitudinal groove extending parallel with the trim punch stroke into the sidewall of the die trim opening. The length of the groove from the top of the die trim opening is equal to the depth of insertion of the trim punch into the die trim opening. The slug will initially be formed with a small projection or nose caused by a shearing action of the slug material in the groove area. As the trim punch reaches maximum insertion into the die trim opening, the slug is pushed beyond the longitudinal extent of the groove. This causes the trim punch to shear off the projection as the projection re-engages the die trim opening sidewall beneath the groove. The shear creates resistance between the slug and the smooth wall surface of the die trim opening sidewall that resists upward movement of the slug at the start of the trim punch extraction stroke.
The groove found in the Kramski die trim sidewalls have disadvantages.
In Kramski's groove design it is critical that the trim punch stroke extend precisely to the bottom of the groove. This critical relationship between the trim punch stroke depth and the groove depth must constantly and precisely be maintained during routine resharpening of the trim punch and the die trim section.
If the trim punch stroke were too shallow, the projection will not engage the die trim opening sidewall beneath the groove. There would be no shearing action created between the slug and the smooth wall surface to resist upward movement of the slug at the start of the trim punch extraction stroke.
A trim punch stroke that is too deep, on the other hand, would cause the trim punch to push the projection beyond the bottom of the groove. Friction on the slug that would resist upward movement of the slug is decreased because of slug material erosion by the sidewall. The projection will be torn off or sheared off of the slug by the trim punch as the slug engages the sidewall below the groove. Small fragments of the torn-off projection will accumulate in and pack into the groove, causing erosion of the projection material before the projection material engages the opening sidewall. The fragments can be drawn upwards by the retracting trim punch to accumulate in the working area of the die, causing damage to the die tooling or the stamped parts.
In addition, Roberts U.S. Pat. No. 6,397,715 states that Kramski's groove design is expensive and difficult to machine.
Roberts discloses forming multiple grooves or irregularities around the circumference of the cutting edge of the sidewall of the die trim opening. The multiple grooves form multiple non-uniform burrs on the slug. The burrs are formed by slug material tearing away from the remainder of the base material in the vicinity of the irregularities, and are not formed by the normal shearing action between the trim punch and the die trim section. The vertical depth of the irregularities into the die trim opening is less than the depth of insertion of the trim punch. At the bottom of the trim punch stroke the burrs lodge against the smooth wall surface of the die trim opening sidewall. Friction force generated between the burrs and the smooth wall surface resists upward movement of the slug at the start of the trim punch extraction stroke.
The grooves found in Roberts' sidewalls also have disadvantages.
Because a burr is created by the slug material stretching, thinning, and then tearing, a burr deforms relatively easily. The retention force generated by the burr and the smooth wall surface is therefore relatively low.
Furthermore, burrs in any stamping operation are undesirable. Burrs create dirt (small fragments of material that have broken off the base material or slug) in the working area of the die. These dirt fragments can be drawn upwards with the trim punch into the working area of the die. Roberts creates additional burrs on the stamping base material that are carried through the working area of the die. Broken off burrs can damage the die tooling or the stamped parts.
Pushing the burrs created by Roberts' grooves deeper along the smooth surface of the die trim opening sidewall causes slug material erosion that reduces the retention force between the slug and the die trim opening sidewall. This increases the likelihood the slug will be unable to resist upward movement at the start of the trim punch extraction stroke.
Roberts' grooves and irregularities also increase the costs to maintain the die tooling. The grooves and irregularities must be re-machined into the top surface of the die trim section after each and every resharpening of the trim section.
It would be desirable to have a slug retention groove that extends longitudinally parallel with the trim punch stroke that does not have to precisely match the trim punch stroke depth and can generate more friction force between the slug and the die trim insert wall to resists upward movement of the slug at the start of the trim punch extraction stroke. The slug retention groove should not create undesirable burrs or dirt, and should not increase the cost to maintain sharp die trim sections.
The present disclosure relates to a new and improved die trim assembly with a groove or recess adapted to retain loose slugs during a stamping process. The recess ensures that the slug produced during a stamping operation will be retained in the die, thereby preventing loose slugs from causing the in-feeding material to jam, preventing damage to the parts being stamped, and preventing loose slugs from damaging die tooling that is expensive to repair or replace.
Unlike Kramski and Roberts, the length of the recess from the top of the die trim opening is greater than the depth of insertion of the trim punch into the die trim opening. The recess extends along the die trim opening axially parallel with the trim punch stroke. As the trim punch cuts through the material being stamped, the recess causes the slug to be cut at the top of the die trim opening with a consistent uniform tab on the slug that extends into the recess. The tab is created by normal shearing action with an established cutting clearance between the trim punch and the trim insert wall. The recess also provides a mechanical action that gradually and continuously compresses the slug material as the slug is pushed deeper into the die trim opening.
In possible embodiments the recess has a decreasing cross-sectional area that faces the slug as the slug moves along the recess. The gradually and continuously decreasing area or taper of the recess promotes compression of the slug material instead of tearing or other deformation of the slug material. The tab moves along the recess and remains in the recess for the full downstroke of the trim punch. The slug and the tab material is not re-sheared during the stamping operation and remains intact. As the trim punch begins the return stroke, the pinching or wedging action on the slug created by the gradual taper of the recess in the die trim opening wall generates friction between the slug and the surfaces of the die trim opening wall and recess that resists upward movement of the slug with the trim punch.
In a possible embodiment the depth of the recess into the die trim opening sidewall decreases continuously as the recess extends away from the top of the die trim opening. The change in recess geometry along the length of the recess causes the tab to compress continuously as the slug is driven along the recess by the trim punch. Because the compression of the tab is continuous along the punch stroke, material erosion is compensated for by the recess taper.
Furthermore, the increased compression of the tab at the bottom of the trim punch stroke increases lateral pressure against the slug, increasing the magnitude of the friction force generated to resist upward movement of the slug with the trim punch.
In an embodiment of the disclosed die trim assembly the recess in the die trim insert wall is created via a vertical conical extrusion such that the top of the recess has a larger radius than the narrower end of the recess which has a smaller radius. The top of the recess is level with the top surface of the die trim section and the bottom of the recess extends down into the slug cavity while the depth of the recess into the die trim insert wall remains the same from the top to the bottom of the recess.
In another embodiment of the disclosed die trim assembly the recess in the die trim insert wall is created via an angled conical extrusion such that the top of the recess is level with the top surface of the die trim section, the lower tapered end of the recess is less deep along the die trim profile wall, and the radius of the top of the recess is larger than the radius of the bottom of the recess.
In yet another embodiment of the disclosed die trim assembly the recess in the die trim insert wall is created via an angled cylindrical extrusion such that the extrusion is deeper at the top surface and tapers into the cavity while the depth of the recess becomes shallower toward the bottom of the die trim profile opening.
In yet other embodiments of the disclosed die trim assembly a series of recesses is provided to new or existing die trim inserts, the recesses being formed by conventional grinding, by wire EDM, or other suitable methods.
The disclosed die trim assembly has other advantages in addition to reliably securing the slug in the die trim insert. The disclosed recess can be easily added to both new and existing stamping dies, which provides a cost-effective solution to improving the stamping process.
And unlike Kramski, the disclosed recess does not require a precise relationship between the length of trim punch travel into the die trim opening and the length of the recess into the die trim opening. And unlike Roberts, the disclosed recess allows many resharpenings of the trim insert without needing to re-machine the recess.
The disclosed die trim assembly is adapted to retain slugs that is not limited by the structure of the die trim assembly. This provides flexibility with regard to the size and shape of the recess and where the recess can be added. Multiple recesses can be added, depending on the size of the loose slugs and the type of material used for stamping. The disclosed die trim assembly will greatly assist metal workers using stamping machines or die trim assemblies by retaining and securing loose slugs during a stamping process.
Furthermore, the disclosed die trim assembly does not require moving the slugs laterally across any surface. The slugs are simply pushed into the die insert after it is punched.
Other objects and features of the disclosure will become apparent as the description proceeds, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing sheets illustrating one or more illustrative embodiments.
Reference is made herein to the attached drawings. Like reference numerals are used throughout the drawings to depict like or similar elements of the die trim assembly with a recess adapted to retain slugs in a stamping process. For the purposes of presenting a brief and clear disclosure, the preferred embodiment will be discussed as used for die trim section assembly with a recess. The figures are intended for representative purposes only and should not be considered to be limiting in any respect.
Referring now to
The recess 24 can be added to an existing die trim profile opening 22 and does not require new parts. The recess 24 may be added to the die trim profile wall 21 using one of various methods, depending upon the embodiment of the recess 24. One of the preferred cutting methods is wire or conventional EDM, which is used to add or retrofit a semi conical embodiment of the recess 24 into a new or existing die trim profile opening 22. For a semi cylindrical embodiment, conventional grinding method, wire EDM, or other suitable method may be used.
The recess 24 is preferably positioned vertically so that the top part of the recess 24 is level with the top surface of the die trim insert 20 and the bottom is below the depth that the trim punch enters the die trim profile opening 22. The bottom end of the recess 24 creates a pinching action and compresses a slug when the slug is pushed down with a trim punch into the die trim profile opening 22 during a stamping process. As a result, the slug is wedged against the die trim profile wall 21 and secured into place. The horizontal depth of recess 24 disposed on the die trim profile wall 21 depends upon the slug size and thickness, the composition of the stamped material, cutting clearance between trim punch and trim profile opening 22, and trim profile opening 22 design. The vertical length of the recess 24 depends upon amount of land in the die trim insert 20 and the distance that the trim punch travels into the trim profile opening 22.
Referring now to
The size and depth of the recess 24 depends on the size of the slug, the cutting clearance, the stamping material, and the trim punch depth into the die trim insert. For instance, a large slug stamped from a thick stamping material would require a larger recess compared to a recess for a smaller slug stamped from a thin stamping material. Furthermore, the vertical depth of the recess is preferably equal to or greater than the depth with which the slug will travel into the die trim profile opening 22. Thus, the vertical depth of the recess may be substantially equal to or more than the distance that the trim punch travels into the die trim profile opening 22. Additionally, more than one recess may be added to a die trim profile wall 21. The stamping material typically comprises of metal, but the stamping material is not limited only to metal, and the teachings of this disclosure can be used when perforating holes and shapes in other materials.
The recess 24 has a cross sectional area perpendicular to the longitudinal central axis of the die trim profile opening 21. Several cross-sectional areas of the recess 24 are shown in phantom in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A cross sectional area of the recess 24 illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring now to
While multiple embodiments have been disclosed and described in detail, it is understood that this is capable of modification and that the scope of the disclosure is not limited to the precise details set forth but includes modifications obvious to a person of ordinary skill in possession of this disclosure and also such changes and alterations as fall within the purview of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/242,925 filed on Apr. 2, 2014 at Attorney Docket No. SC318892, entitled “Stamping Slug Retention Recess”, which in turn claims the benefit of now expired U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/813,033 filed on Apr. 17, 2013, entitled “Saige Slug Retention Features.” The above identified patent applications are each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety to provide continuity of disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61813033 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14242925 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 15153285 | US |