Thieves who break into moving vans, tractor trailers and other cargo containers use a variety of tools such as sledge hammers, acetylene cutting torches, saws, grinders and the like. The bolt cutter is a favored tool of burglars for cutting padlocks because of its portability. Thus there is a need to protect padlocks used on containers, moving vans, semi-trailers, truck trailer units. Tractor trailers with twin rear doors are secured by a pair of stanchions, at least one of which having an operating handle or lever, which is normally secured by a padlock to prevent rotation of the stanchion, thus maintaining the doors in a locked condition. Many moving vans have side doors, which are secured by stanchions. A recess with a locking tab is provided in each side door. The stanchion locking lever, in its locking position, is disposed within the recess with the locking tab extending through a slot in the lever. A padlock is customarily connected to the tab to prevent operation of the stanchion lever. It is also desirable to provide protection for padlocks securing side doors of moving vans.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,828,591 and 3,392,855 issued to Commodore E. Beaver show combined padlock and guard assemblies in which the shackle of a padlock is welded to the guard. Since the shackle is not free to move relative to the guard, the applicability of such an assembly to secure enclosures is limited. Different size guards would be needed for different size locks. There is no interchangeability between locks and guards. U.S. Pat. No. 6,622,533 issued to Jerre Dennis Santini for a Protective Enclosure for a Door Handle Retaining Assembly shows a lock guard with a lock capturing member to which the unhinged leg of a lock shackle is secured. In order to place the lock on the inside of the guard and to be in position to slide the end of the free or unhinged leg of the shackle into the opening in the lock capturing member sufficient distance must exist within the guard above the lock capturing member. The padlock's shackle in its open position is sufficiently longer than the shackle in its closed position, thus requiring incremental space be designed above the lock capturing member—additional space beyond the height of the shackle in the locked position—for the pre-insertion step. This is particularly necessary since Santini uses the lock's unhinged shackle which requires even more elevation above the lock capturing member than the hinged shackle and, due to the height differences, by design negates the use of the top wall during the operation to close and secure the shackle. Consequently, during installation of the padlock into the guard, the shackle can not physically reach the underside of the top wall of the guard to aid in closing the shackle and therefore sufficient space must be provided in the guard to permit one's hand, or a tool, to be placed within the guard to force the shackle to a closed position. This is necessitated by the requirement to apply pressure both from the shackle end and the case end while securing the shackle. Incrementally, this is even more space than the mere lock shackle's open distance dictates. These space requirements result in an excessively large guard affording undesired access by thieves' cutting tools.
This invention is directed to a lock guard, which prevents bolt cutters or the like from being employed to cut the shackle of a padlock. The lock guard has a top wall, a front wall, a pair of laterally opposite side walls and an interior wall or tab extending rearwardly from the front wall and between the side walls with an opening through which the hinged leg of a padlock shackle extends when the latter is in its installed locking position. The padlock is locked by pushing the case of the padlock upwardly thereby abutting the shackle against an abutment on the underside of the top wall to force the shackle to a closed position. In the installed position of the padlock the shackle is shielded by the top, front and side walls of the housing and only the key end of the padlock casing is exposed at the open bottom of the protective shell formed by the walls.
Three embodiments of the invention are shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
The lock guard 11 shown in
Some stanchion locking levers do not have a reinforcing ridge. Such a locking lever 16 is shown in
Referring to
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent Ser. No. 11/230,677 filed Sep. 20, 2005 for a Stanchion Lever Lock Guard. Applicant claims the benefit of United States of America provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/612,328 filed Sep. 23, 2004 for a Lock Guard.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3392555 | Beaver | Jul 1968 | A |
3606423 | McCarthy | Sep 1971 | A |
3744280 | Brown et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3808847 | Vesely | May 1974 | A |
3828591 | Beaver | Aug 1974 | A |
4106315 | Dohanyos | Aug 1978 | A |
4566296 | Kochakis | Jan 1986 | A |
4883294 | Goodspeed | Nov 1989 | A |
4920772 | Denison | May 1990 | A |
4972689 | Anderson | Nov 1990 | A |
5168258 | Radke | Dec 1992 | A |
5172574 | Perfetto | Dec 1992 | A |
5477710 | Stefanutti | Dec 1995 | A |
5946952 | Mintchenko | Sep 1999 | A |
6009731 | Emmons et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010166 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6058745 | Sanchez | May 2000 | A |
6357266 | Van Buren | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6463769 | Garner | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494064 | Pena | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519982 | Brammall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6581419 | Strodtman | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6622533 | Santini | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6668601 | Reddick | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6928843 | Pirnie | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6983629 | Gogel | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003989 | St. James | Feb 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60612328 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11230677 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11605979 | US |