This application claims priority of the German patent application 101 23 166.0 filed Mar. 30, 2001 which is incorporated by reference herein.
The invention concerns a stand, in particular for a surgical microscope. The purpose of such stands is to hold a relatively heavy microscope so that it is movable by an operator with a minimum of resistance. An effort is therefore made to configure all joints, bearings, and the like in as low-resistance a fashion as possible, so that as little resistance as possible is presented to any arbitrary movement by the user.
The result of a greater smoothness of operation in stands is that, in event of irregularities in the installation location (uneven floor) but also in the event of changes in the loads on the stand, moments of force or torques can occur that cause portions of the stand, in particular the stand arm, to move in drifting fashion in the unbraked state. “Drift” is understood to mean lateral pivoting motions (about a rotation axis), or tendencies toward such pivoting motions of the carrier arm, that are undesired by the user.
Three different actions for the reduction of drift are known from the existing art:
1. Alignment of the stand foot. At least three of, for example, four support feet of the stand foot are made adjustable as to height, and a bubble level on the stand foot indicates its horizontal alignment. A device of this kind is implemented, for example, on the FM2 of the Mitaka company. It ensures a precise adjustment capability, but entails the following disadvantages: Because a three-point adjustment is involved, a displacement at one of the three points creates a need for readjustment at the other two adjustment points. Inexperienced persons have a great deal of difficulty making the adjustment in quick and effective fashion.
There are further disadvantages as well:
Firstly, the adjustment to the stand foot is made while stooped over near the floor.
Secondly, a new adjustment must be made after each change of location, and possibly even after each load change on the stand arm, and usually on all three adjustment devices (or all the adjustment devices that are present).
Thirdly, the installation of the adjustment devices forces the operating person to work, when making the adjustments, in the vicinity of the floor, i.e. in a region that is remote from the patient in an operating room and has a lower degree of sterility.
In addition, an extra assistant might be needed in order to make the adjustments, whereas it would be desirable if an adjustment could be made by the surgeon or an operating room nurse him- or herself.
2. The second known variant comprises a brake to increase the rotational friction. With such a brake, the advantage of smooth operation is deliberately abandoned in order to reduce drift. For the user, this disadvantageously results in an increased need for force when moving the carrier arm. For the surgeon, a high level of exertion makes it difficult subsequently to wield a scalpel, or to do other work that requires a steady hand.
3. The third variant has hitherto been disclosed only in the context of ceiling mounts, and has nothing to do with the actual problem of changes in drift characteristics due to an uneven floor or the like, since in the case of a ceiling mount a fixed attachment point is usually provided from the outset, and no change takes place in the location on the ceiling. When the fixed installation point is created, it is of course optimally laid out so that a ceiling mount in principle has no drift. The adjustment in this context corresponds approximately to the leveling of a stand foot on the floor, although no further change in position is made after this adjustment. On the other hand, the loading of a ceiling mount, possibly with differing weights, creates another risk that in turn can generate drift:
Because of the limited stiffness of a conventional horizontal stand arm that is attached to a vertical support, when a further stand arm attached to that horizontal carrier arm is bent about a vertical pivot axis, the weight of the further carrier arm and of the microscope attached to it results in a torsion on the first carrier arm. Conversely, a flexural load on the stand arm results when the stand arm is extended. The purpose and solution in the case of the ceiling mount was to attain a state in which the microscope lies at the same height when the stand arm is both in the bent position and in the extended position. Once this adjustment has been made, in principle it remains unchanged. A change in the position of one of the stand arms does not change the behavior. Changes in location on the ceiling do not occur.
More detailed examinations of known stand assemblages, for example that of the Dräger series (the Dräger company in Germany has brought to market, under the product designation “Movita,” a series of ceiling mounts that are used in intensive medicine and intensive care) or that of the Kreuzer company in Germany, offer no way toward a solution, since with these ceiling mounts, pivoting movability for surgical microscopes with magnifying properties is not paramount.
Greater frictional forces in rotary bearings do, however, keep them from running out of position, so that in known intensive-medicine ceiling mounts, the problem just mentioned does not even occur. What is required specifically in the case of microscope stands, however, is that the device not drift when the brakes are open, but can be moved with particular smoothness. There exist, for example, mouth switches with which the surgeon can, using his or her lips, on the one hand release the brakes and on the other hand reposition the brakes.
In the aforementioned previously published Patent Application EP-A-1067419, FIGS. 5–7 and the relevant portions of the specification disclose a known mechanism of this kind for preventing drift in ceiling mounts. This known drift prevention device acts, if required, in only one plane. Since the one-time, completely leveled attachment point on the ceiling means that lateral irregularities do not occur, there was hitherto also no need to provide further leveling features or drift compensation features on a ceiling mount. In this respect, this teaching known per se also offers those skilled in the art absolutely no stimulus to ensure that an improvement is created in floor stands with regard to the problem mentioned initially, namely that changes in the inclination of the stand foot usually occur after a change in the location of floor stands.
It is thus the object of the invention to discover an optimum adjustability for drift prevention on a stand, without impairing the smooth operation of the stand. In a further step, the intention is to discover a capability for performing drift compensation adjustment more quickly and easily than heretofore, and with no need for stooping.
The basic idea in this context is to bring into plumb the axis about which the horizontal carrier arm would drift due to gravity if the assembly were not aligned.
The object is achieved by application of the features of the present invention, in which at least one vertical rotation axis or at least one vertical rotary bearing of the stand can be brought, displaceably in at least two planes, into a perpendicular position with respect to the stand foot irrespective of the position of the upright column.
A “stand foot” is to be understood as all those apparatuses which support a stand with respect to the floor. These may be conventional stand feet but also carriages, trolleys, or the like. “Upright columns” are to be understood not just as conventional vertical columns on a stand foot, but also as carrier arms or the like that are movable on rails, trolleys, or the like.
Further embodiments and developments of the invention are recited in the dependent claims and in the description of the Figures.
The invention is explained in more detail, by way of example, with reference to sketches.
a shows a stand assemblage with spindles and X/Z and Y/Z carriages;
The Figures are described in overlapping fashion; identical reference characters denote identical components; reference characters having the same numbers but different indices denote slightly different components having the same purpose or similar effects.
As is evident from
It is evident from
a symbolically shows the construction of a displacement apparatus that makes do with two spindles 38a and 38b that are arranged (e.g. in a vertical tube) each within an axially immovably mounted nut 37a and 37b respectively. Both a pushing motion (as in
A spherical bearing 79 forms the central articulation point for a shaft 72 that carries pivot bearing 33c in upright column 1. Bearing 79 is held or configured on upright column 1, and receives a ball 73a that is rigidly joined to shaft 72. Simultaneously rigidly joined to said shaft is a yoke 74 that supports a pivoting yoke 75 at both ends. Pivoting yoke 75 is joined to a pivoting tongue 49. A deflection of pivoting tongue 49 results in a pivoting of shaft 72 about its own axis 68 or about ball 73a. As is evident from
In order to make this bearing sleeve 33c also pivotable in a transverse direction, the end of shaft 72 is also held, for example by way of a ball 73b, in a plain bearing 71 in which it can both pivot back and forth in the axial direction and rotate about its axis 68. By means of threaded spindle 53, plain bearing 71 is displaceable in its height position relative to upright column 1. In this displacement, shaft 72 pivots in spherical bearing 79 without influencing pivoting yoke 75.
The pivoting motion about the two axes 68 and 78 is generated, in the preferred embodiment model as shown in
In
Also visible is a portion of cover 51, which forms the exterior of the upright column and can be attached to attachment pegs 76.
A simultaneous displacement of the two spindles 53 or shafts 50 thus results in a deflection of bearing sleeve 33c obliquely with respect to axes 78 and 68. The pivoting about each of axes 78 and 68 may be made independently, and does not influence the other respective pivot position. In contrast to other similar level adjustment apparatuses, the displaceability is thus implemented in a manner comparable to a simple X-Y carriage but in pivoting fashion, which thus greatly simplifies operability even for inexperienced persons. This assemblage is further simplified by the replacement of the manually operated displacement screws 34c and 34d by electrical drives 54, which are as indicated by way of example in
The Parts List which follows is a constituent of the Specification and supplements the Description of the Figures. The assemblages, apparatuses, and details recited in the claims are also considered to be disclosed in the context of the Specification.
The entirety of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/107,464 (claiming priority of German patent application 101 15 837.8 filed Mar. 31, 2001) filed on the same date as the present application and sharing the same applicant is incorporated herein by reference, since a possible further configuration of a stand according to the present invention is further described therein with other details. The teachings of the two patent applications can be combined with one another.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 23 166 | Mar 2001 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2469904 | Szuba | May 1949 | A |
| 2560001 | Scholfield et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
| 2898068 | Warren | Aug 1959 | A |
| 2970798 | Fritchle et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
| 3044740 | Pearce et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3167292 | Meyerowitz | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3672620 | Fink | Jun 1972 | A |
| 4284257 | Murkens | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4473074 | Vassiliadis | Sep 1984 | A |
| 5118058 | Richter | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5996946 | Bailey | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6334594 | Bailey | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6364268 | Metelski | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 20020185583 | Metelski | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020185583 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |