The present invention pertains to recognition systems and particularly to biometric recognition systems. More particularly, the invention pertains to iris recognition systems.
Related applications may include U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/979,129, filed Nov. 3, 2004, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/655,124, filed Sep. 5, 2003; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/672,108, filed Feb. 7, 2007.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/275,703, filed Jan. 25, 2006, is hereby incorporated by reference.
U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/647,270, filed Jan. 26, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/043,366, filed Jan. 26, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/372,854, filed Mar. 10, 2006, is hereby incorporated by reference.
U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/778,770, filed Mar. 3, 2006, is hereby incorporated by reference.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/672,108, filed Feb. 7, 2007, is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention is a stand off iris recognition system.
a and 8b are diagrams illustrating an approach for estimating eyelash/lid curve detection;
Various noted properties of irises may make iris recognition technology as a reliable person identification tool. For instance, irises may have uniqueness unlike other biometric technologies, such as face-prints and fingerprints. Irises may be unique to a person and even among genetically twin individuals. Although the striking visual similarity of identical twins reveals the genetic penetrance of facial appearance, a comparison of genetically identical irises reveals just the opposite for iris patterns. Further, there appears to be no aging effect, that is, there is stability over the life of iris features. The physical characteristics of iris patterns are unalterable without significant duress. A non-invasive iris may be considered as an internal unique organ but yet is externally visible and can be measured. It is in a protected environment but still visible.
The present system and approach address the real-time operational requirements of a standoff iris recognition system and may be regarded as an “on-the-fly” iris recognition system. Unlike other approaches, which mostly are based on brute force of a Hough Transform to fit the iris edges into circular or regular shapes, one may employ an efficient and robust enhancement approach built around a polar segmentation (POSE) technique by the present assignee disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/043,366, filed Jan. 26, 2005. Present improvements made to the POSE segmentation technique contribute to a robust and computational efficient and accurate real-time iris recognition.
The present iris recognition system is well suited for high-security access control or “at-a-distance biometrics” applications with little or no control exercised on subject positioning or orientations. The iris recognition operation may include subjects captured at various ranges from the acquisition device or include subjects that may not have their eye directly aligned with the imaging equipment. Usually, for such applications, it may be difficult to implement a level of control required by most of the existing art to enable reliable iris recognition operations. The present approach of iris recognition may cope with asymmetry in acquired iris imaging and it can operate under any uncontrolled operations as long as some of the iris annular is visible.
The present system may provide an accurate segmentation technique and hence identify good iris patterns, which may be regarded as signatures. The present system may take the analysis of edges into polar domain and use local patterns to detect iris features using an enhanced version of POSE technique disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/275,703. This technique may detect curves of the iris borders of any irregular shapes. A detection algorithm may robustly detect the inner and outer borders of the eye iris for the purpose of human or animal recognition.
The present approach may begin with a mapping the analysis immediately into the polar domain with respect to a centered point in the pupil region. The centered point, not necessarily the exact center of the pupil but may be identified within the pupil region. One may then detect edges of the inner and outer borders of the iris based upon a one dimensional polar segmentation (1D POSE) technique and detect the irregular shape of the iris curves using additional rules that are introduced on the POSE technique to cluster the edge points separately into two groups that represent edges at the sclera and edges at the borders of the eyelids. One may extract the iris signature using a guided analysis to correctly normalize the stretching and compression of the patterns and bring uniformity into the interpretation of the patterns. In addition, one may cluster obscured pixels and affected areas to be either weighted with low weights or masked out of the analysis. The patterns may then be matched against multiple codes within a database and are given weights based upon the pattern visibility and exposure to the camera system.
The present system and approach may include the following items. There may be a map analysis at an earlier stage to conduct segmentation into the polar domain. Iris inner border detection may be achieved using the estimated edges of POSE or any other active contour technique that provides a way to analyze each edge at each angle separately to determine whether the resulting edge is a valid border edge or invalided edge. A valid edge may be defined as an edge that was detected within a predefined range. Any edge point that results out of range or at the extreme points of the gradient signal segment may represent a leaked peak and is treated as invalid edge. A predefined regular or irregular model shape may be used to fit the resulting edges. The depicted model shape may be used to fill in any missing edges within the contour of the pupil to replace the non-valid points with the estimated points from the irregular shape. The analysis may be offset with a predefined minimum possible width of an iris as the starting point for the iris outer border analysis. Boundary edges may be extracted using POSE. A median filter may be run to smooth the resulting outcome of POSE. The boundary edge points may be clustered into several categories: 1) sclera and iris boundary points; and 2) iris and eyelid boundary points to be analyzed differently. The valid sclera and iris boundary points may be extracted. These edge points may be fitted into a predefined regular model shape. The regular model shape may be used for guidance of the analysis and will not present the final outcome of the edge estimates.
One may track the lowermost points of the lowermost curve of the upper eyelid edge, and track the uppermost points of the upper curve of the lower eyelid edges. Then one may interpolate among these samples to replace the entire angular range corresponding to the eyelid obscurations. The area between the estimated eyelid-eyelash curve and the pupil curve (inner border) may be measured. Weights may be assigned based upon significance of the area between the curves. In some approaches, one may choose to assign zero to the weights to discard the entire region given the significance of the occlusions. The spacing between the inner and outer curves may be scaled based upon the position of the outer curve within the regular shape. The actual edge points detected by POSE may be used to be the actual edges of the iris borders and not the fitted model shapes.
Any pixel that lies within the outer border of the iris and the fitting model shape may be masked. Any pixel that lies outside the fitting shape may be discarded. The pixels may be mapped into an iris pattern map. Virtually any encoding scheme may be used to compress the image into few bits while covering the entire angular range using a predefined angular resolution and radius resolution. A similarity of information metric may be used to measure the similarity among the barcode of the templates for matching while weighing the pixels that come from valid edges with higher values and weighing pixels associated with invalid edges or obscuration with smaller or zero values.
The present approach may be for performing iris recognition under suboptimal image acquisition conditions. The approach may be for iris segmentation to detect all boundaries (inner, outer, eyelid and sclera and horizon) of the image iris simultaneously.
The overall structure of the standoff iris recognition system 10 is shown in the
Constraint evaluation is where a peak may be detected within a range. Edge detection may be on the limits within a certain range. A rough center location and an approximate size of the pupil may be attained. When the edges of the pupil are detected as peaks within the 1D signal along the radial axis and are said to be valid if they were detected within the radial range, one may have a validation of the pupil by testing the pupil profile, estimates of the edges. The new edges may yield to a better estimate of the pupil center sufficient for analysis.
A median filter 23 may be applied to eliminate salt and pepper noise due to the system acquisition of background noise. At this point, the image may be a kernel, i.e., a block of pixels of a pupil for analysis. The image 21 may be passed through a low pass filter 24 to smooth the variation with the pupil region while preserving the apparent contrast change at the edge of the pupil and the iris. Next, the POSE-1D segmentation 25 may be applied. The validity of the edges at step or stage 51, indicated by a diamond symbol, may be determined by checking whether the peaks in the contrast changes are leaked to the edges of the gradient of the contrast change signal. The leaking may indicate several cases. A constraint may include that the pixels of the edge be within a set range. First, the actual edge of the pupil may be too close to the signal edge and therefore the detected edge might not reflect the actual edge of the gradient. There may not be enough contrast to can determine whether there is a pupil edge. There may be a presence of obstacles that is obscuring the pupil edges. Obstacles may include skin of an eye, eyelashes due to eye closure, an eyeglass frame, a contact lens, optics, and the like. In either case, the peak may be deemed an invalid peak or an edge of a pupil. One may then fit only the valid points into a predefined model shape, i.e., elliptic fitting 52, just for guidance. Two alternatives may then be proposed. In an approach 54, one may actually use the estimated shape 56, 52, 48 (i.e., ellipse) that replaces the actual edges as an approximation to the pupil edges (which may also be referred to as an inner bound of the iris). In another approach 53, the actual active contour edge 57 may be kept as a final outcome using the POSE technique and only the invalid edges will be replaced by points from the estimated shape (i.e., the estimated ellipse).
Once the iris inner border at the pupil is estimated, one may move outward from the pupil with some margin that represents the least possible width of an iris. Then that width offset may be used as the starting point of the iris outer border analysis. An offset 90 of
The output of the valid edge determination diamond symbol 51 may go to a pruning block 40 where prompt changes of the edge 38 may be smoothed or reduced in its extension out from the edge curve. Then, the edge 38 may go to a predefined model shape (such as elliptic fitting) block 52. Here, the edge 38 of pupil 31 is fitted with a model shape curve 48 (as an example, one may show an elliptic shape as a fitting model shown as a thick line in
An output of elliptic fitting block 52 may go to a diamond 55 which asks whether the actual contour 38 or the model fitting 48 should be used. One may note that in either case, the model fitting or curve 48 should always be used for the non-valid portions of curve or contour 38 incorporating such. The approach does not get affected by any reflection within the pupil and as shown in
If the answer at diamond 55 is no, then the model curve 48 is used in place of the valid and non-valid portions of pupil edge 38. The output of block 54 may be a pupil border 56 as shown in image 58. If the answer is yes at diamond 55, then a “snake”, which is an active contour, that is, an estimate of the actual edge 38, rather than the ellipse approximation 48, is used for the valid portions of edge 38. The output of block 53 may be a pupil border 57 as shown in image 59. One may note two reflections 61 in the pupil of images 58 and 59. These reflections may be a pattern of the light used for analytical purposes of a pupil and so that the reflection on the pupil may be found and identified. Also, arrows 62 may repeat elliptic fitting data sent to blocks 53 and 54 for effecting an elliptic curve fit.
An enhancement to elliptic fitting may be added as a part of the elliptic fitting box 52. This enhancement may be a pruning of the pupil edge before doing a model fitting at block or module 52 (
An output 64 from median filter 102 of module 94 may go to a (∂r/∂θ) module 71 for sclera borders, as shown in
A combined output 66 from the 1D median filters 102 and 63 may go to a map analysis center 81. Also, outputs from the circular fitting module 76, the extract eyelash edges module 77 and the mask eyelashes module 78 may go to a center 81 for a map analysis.
The preprocessing may include the filter or combination 30 of a median 23 and low pass filter 24 of
In another approach, one may estimate the limits the symmetry ends by conducting the following steps. The lowermost edge points of the upper eyelid edge may be fit into a straight-line and the uppermost of the lower eyelid edge points may be fit into a straight line crossing the detected iris outer border curve (original curve detected by POSE). The intersection of these two straight lines and the curve may define a good estimate of the trapezoid contour of the eye socket. The intersection of these lines and the pre-estimated shape may define these boundary points. The POSE+ subroutine is shown with a diagram in
An output 64 from median filter 102 of module 94 may go to a (∂r/∂θ) module 71 for sclera borders. An output 65 from median filter 63 may go to a (∂/∂θ) module 72. An output from module 71 may go to a count module 73, and an output from module 72 may go to a count module 74. If the count at module 73 is not less than λ (where λ is as discussed herein), then there is not a valid eye image 75. If the count is less than λ, then a circular fitting may be placed on the iris outer sclera borders at module 76. If the count at module 74 is not greater than λ, then the eyelash edges may be extracted at module 77. This may involve 1D POSE+. If the count at module 74 is greater than λ, then the eyelashes may be masked at module 78. This may involve POSE 1D. A combined output 66 from the 1D median filters 102 and 63 may go to a map analysis center 81. Also, outputs from the circular fitting module 76, the extract eyelash edges module 77 and the mask eyelashes module 78 may go to a center 81 for a map analysis.
Eyelid detection may be noted. With the nature of eye closure under nominal conditions, there may be two possibilities for eye positioning. One is a wide-open eye and another partially open. In either case, one might only consider points of observable edges of iris in the curve fitting. To estimate the eyelid edges, one may track the lowermost points of the lowermost curve 82 (
One may interpolate among these samples to cover the entire angular range corresponding to the eyelid segments, L=┐θ2−θ1┌. Thus,
One may limit the sampling space to a predefined angular range φ, so the next sampling point is determined using the following minimization equation, {tilde over (x)}k=min(xk−1+φ,xk).
A weighting scheme may also be introduced to assess the obscuration amount of the eyelids, eyelashes or other manner of obscuration such as glass, a frame, and so forth. The obscuration may be assessed by computing the integral of the area between the eyelid curve and pupil boundary with the following equation,
where θi represents the angles associated with the boundary curve of the eyelash/eyelid, and rp(θ) is the estimated pupil radius at angle θ. The integral may be evaluated over the angular range covered by eyelashes (and/or eyelids) and be based upon the value of the integral with respect to a pre-estimated threshold. A weighting factor may be assigned to these angular segments to be used in the matching function.
Once the iris region is successfully segmented using the POSE technique, the next stage may be to extract the valid sclera and iris boundary points and fit these edge points into a predefined regular shape, e.g., a circular shape. It is important to note that these regular shapes are generally not used as the final outcome of the detection. The regular shapes may be used for guiding the present normalization process and to keep the actual detected edges of the active contour that POSE has identified.
The normalization is crucial to iris processing to address dimensional changes of the iris shapes. These dimensional inconsistencies may be mainly due to the iris stretches and dilation of the pupil that usually undergoes different environment lightings as well as imaging distance variations. The regular shape is not meant to be the final outcome of the present estimates. The curve detected by the present active contour approach as an ensemble of all edges detected by POSE may be the final estimate of the iris outer border edges. The predefined shape may be used to scale back the curve shape into a common scaling for normalization purposes as well as an approach to identify areas that do not belong to the iris map and ought to be masked from the analysis. The regular shape may define the actual scaling needed to bring uniformity among all the captured images and templates in the database. The analytical formula for computing the scaled signal vector of the pixels along the radius variable is shown in the following,
{tilde over (s)}θ(r)=sθ(r)u(Re−r)+E[sθ(r)]θ,ru(r−Re), (3)
where sθ(r) represents the pixel values at a radius r and angle θ. The function {tilde over (s)}(r) may represent the elements of the scaled vector that is used to map the iris pixels into the normalized iris pattern map (also referred to as a rubber sheet). One may use u(r) to denote the step function. The expected value of the signal function shown in equation (3) represents the expected value edge based upon the fitting model. For circular model, E[sθ(r)]=Re (circular radius).
A challenge in building the standoff iris recognition system may lie at how to extract and segment the boundaries of an iris and not necessarily the compression approach to encode the barcode of the extracted map. To complete the iris recognition process, iris encoding may usually be used to compress the iris map into fewer bits in a barcode to be stored or matched against other barcodes stored in a database. The iris encoding may be processed on the iris map to extract the pattern texture variations. What type of encoding or algorithm may be irrelevant here as there are many COTS approaches to encode a digital image. One may make use of Gabor filters to encode the iris map image to its minimum possible number of bits so that metrics can be used to give one range of values when comparing templates with capture maps. Similarly, any similarity metrics may be used to measure the information similarity among templates. One metric in particular that may be used is the weighted hamming distance (WHD). The WHD may give more weight to the pixels associated with valid edges and less weight to the pixels that are associated with non-valid pixels. The masked pixels may of course be zeroed out during the matching process.
The present system provides a solution to an issue of eye gazing where an individual subject is looking off angle and not straight to the camera system. Gazing effects on iris segmentation may be dramatic and trying to quantify the amount of eye gazing to correct for it may be regarded by many as challenging. A correction process may involve many geometrical models and assumptions that are not general and image specific. The model complexity and its analysis might not only reduce the robustness of the gaze detection estimations but also often introduce errors into the estimates. The present system does not require any gaze detection in that it is designed to deal with all image perspectives.
In iris feature extraction analysis, for instance, θ is with respect to a center 111 of a pupil 114, and θ+Δθ is with respect to the iris center 112, as shown in
In the present specification, some of the matter may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature although stated in another manner or tense.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative example, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/275,703, filed Jan. 25, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/647,270, filed Jan. 26, 2005. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/043,366, filed Jan. 26, 2005. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/372,854, filed Mar. 10, 2006; This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/672,108, filed Feb. 7, 2007. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/778,770, filed Mar. 3, 2006.
The government may have rights in the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4641349 | Flom et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4836670 | Hutchinson | Jun 1989 | A |
5231674 | Cleveland et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5291560 | Daugman | Mar 1994 | A |
5293427 | Ueno et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5359382 | Uenaka | Oct 1994 | A |
5404013 | Tajima | Apr 1995 | A |
5551027 | Choy et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572596 | Wildes et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5608472 | Szirth et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5664239 | Nakata | Sep 1997 | A |
5717512 | Chmielewski, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5751836 | Wildes et al. | May 1998 | A |
5859686 | Aboutalib et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860032 | Iwane | Jan 1999 | A |
5896174 | Nakata | Apr 1999 | A |
5901238 | Matsushita | May 1999 | A |
5909269 | Isogai et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5953440 | Zhang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956122 | Doster | Sep 1999 | A |
5978494 | Zhang | Nov 1999 | A |
6005704 | Chmielewski, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007202 | Apple et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012376 | Hanke et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021210 | Camus et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028949 | McKendall | Feb 2000 | A |
6055322 | Salganicoff et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064752 | Rozmus et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069967 | Rozmus et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081607 | Mori et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088470 | Camus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091899 | Konishi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101477 | Hohle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104431 | Inoue et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108636 | Yap et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119096 | Mann et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120461 | Smyth | Sep 2000 | A |
6134339 | Luo | Oct 2000 | A |
6144754 | Okano et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6246751 | Bergl et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247813 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252977 | Salganicoff et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282475 | Washington | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285505 | Melville et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285780 | Yamakita et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289113 | McHugh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299306 | Braithwaite et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308015 | Matsumoto | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309069 | Seal et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320610 | Van Sant et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320612 | Young | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320973 | Suzaki et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6323761 | Son | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325765 | Hay et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330674 | Angelo et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332193 | Glass et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344683 | Kim | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370260 | Pavlidis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377699 | Musgrave et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393136 | Amir et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400835 | Lemelson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424727 | Musgrave et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424845 | Emmoft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433818 | Steinberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438752 | McClard | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441482 | Foster | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446045 | Stone et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6483930 | Musgrave et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484936 | Nicoll et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490443 | Freeny, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493363 | Weaver et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493669 | Curry et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494363 | Roger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503163 | Van Sant et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505193 | Musgrave et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506078 | Mori et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508397 | Do | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516078 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516087 | Camus | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516416 | Gregg et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522772 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523165 | Liu et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526160 | Ito | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532298 | Cambier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540392 | Braithwaite | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542624 | Oda | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546121 | Oda | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553494 | Glass | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580356 | Alt et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591001 | Oda et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591064 | Higashiyama et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594377 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594399 | Camus et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598971 | Cleveland | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600878 | Pregara | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6614919 | Suzaki et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6652099 | Chae et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6674367 | Sweatte | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690997 | Rivalto | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708176 | Strunk et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711562 | Ross et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714665 | Hanna et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718049 | Pavlidis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718665 | Hess et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732278 | Baird, III et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734783 | Anbai | May 2004 | B1 |
6745520 | Puskaric et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750435 | Ford | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751733 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753919 | Daugman | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754640 | Bozeman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760467 | Min et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765470 | Shinzaki | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766041 | Golden et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775774 | Harper | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785406 | Kamada | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6793134 | Clark | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819219 | Bolle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829370 | Pavlidis et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832044 | Doi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836554 | Bolle et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837436 | Swartz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845479 | Illman | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853444 | Haddad | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867683 | Calvesio et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873960 | Wood et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6896187 | Stockhammer | May 2005 | B2 |
6905411 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920237 | Chen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930707 | Bates et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934849 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950139 | Fujinawa | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954738 | Wang et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957341 | Rice et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6972797 | Izumi | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6992562 | Fuks et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7053948 | Konishi | May 2006 | B2 |
7071971 | Elberbaum | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084904 | Liu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7136581 | Fujii | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7183895 | Bazakos et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184577 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197173 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7204425 | Mosher, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7277561 | Shin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7277891 | Howard et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298873 | Miller, Jr. et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315233 | Yuhara | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7362210 | Bazakos et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362370 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362884 | Willis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365771 | Kahn et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7406184 | Wolff et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7414648 | Imada | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417682 | Kuwakino et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418115 | Northcott et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421097 | Hamza et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443441 | Hiraoka | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7460693 | Loy et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471451 | Dent et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486806 | Azuma et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7518651 | Butterworth | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537568 | Moehring | May 2009 | B2 |
7538326 | Johnson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542945 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7580620 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593550 | Hamza | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7639846 | Yoda | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7722461 | Gatto et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7751598 | Matey et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756301 | Hamza | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756407 | Raskar | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761453 | Hamza | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7777802 | Shinohara et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804982 | Howard et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010026632 | Tamai | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027116 | Baird | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047479 | Bromba et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051924 | Uberti | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054154 | Tam | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010857 | Karthik | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020033896 | Hatano | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039433 | Shin | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020040434 | Elliston et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062280 | Zachariassen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077841 | Thompson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089157 | Breed et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106113 | Park | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112177 | Voltmer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114495 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130961 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131622 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139842 | Swaine | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020140715 | Smet | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020142844 | Kerr | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144128 | Rahman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150281 | Cho | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154794 | Cho | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158750 | Almalik | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164054 | McCartney et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175182 | Matthews | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186131 | Fettis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191075 | Doi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191076 | Wada et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194128 | Maritzen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194131 | Dick | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198731 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002714 | Wakiyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012413 | Kusakari et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014372 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020828 | Ooi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038173 | Blackson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046228 | Berney | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053663 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055689 | Block et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055787 | Fujii | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058492 | Wakiyama | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061172 | Robinson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061233 | Manasse et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065626 | Allen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071743 | Seah et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072475 | Tamori | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073499 | Reece | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074317 | Hofi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074326 | Byers | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076161 | Tisse | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076300 | Lauper et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076984 | Tisse et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080194 | O'Hara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091215 | Lauper et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092489 | Veradej | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095689 | Volkommer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098776 | Friedli | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099379 | Monk et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099381 | Ohba | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103652 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030107097 | McArthur et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030107645 | Yoon | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108224 | Ike | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108225 | Li | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115148 | Takhar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115459 | Monk | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030116630 | Carey et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118212 | Min et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118217 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123711 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125054 | Garcia | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125057 | Pesola | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126560 | Kurapati et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131245 | Linderman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131265 | Bhakta | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133597 | Moore et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140235 | Immega et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140928 | Bui et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141411 | Pandya et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149881 | Patel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152251 | Ike | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152252 | Kondo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156741 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158762 | Wu | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158821 | Maia | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159051 | Hollnagel | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163739 | Armington et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169334 | Braithwaite et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169901 | Pavlidis et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169907 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030173408 | Mosher, Jr. et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174049 | Beigel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177051 | Driscoll et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182151 | Taslitz | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182182 | Kocher | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189480 | Hamid | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189481 | Hamid | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191949 | Odagawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194112 | Lee | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195935 | Leeper | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198368 | Kee | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200180 | Phelan, III et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210139 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210802 | Schuessier | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218719 | Abourizk et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225711 | Paping | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228898 | Rowe | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233556 | Angelo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235326 | Morikawa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235411 | Morikawa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236120 | Reece et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001614 | Russon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002894 | Kocher | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040005078 | Tillotson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006553 | de Vries et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010462 | Moon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012760 | Mihashi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019570 | Bolle et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023664 | Mirouze et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023709 | Beaulieu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025030 | Corbett-Clark et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025031 | Ooi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025053 | Hayward | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029564 | Hodge | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030930 | Nomura | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035123 | Kim et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037450 | Bradski | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039914 | Barr et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042641 | Jakubowski | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044627 | Russell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046640 | Jourdain et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049687 | Orsini et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050924 | Mletzko et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050930 | Rowe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052405 | Walfridsson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052418 | DeLean | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059590 | Mercredi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059953 | Purnell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040104266 | Bolle et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117636 | Cheng | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133804 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146187 | Jeng | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148526 | Sands et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160518 | Park | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162870 | Matsuzaki et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162984 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169817 | Grotehusmann et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172541 | Ando et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174070 | Voda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190759 | Caldwell | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193893 | Braithwaite et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219902 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233038 | Beenau et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240711 | Hamza et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252866 | Tisse et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255168 | Murashita et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008200 | Azuma et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008201 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012817 | Hampapur et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029353 | Isemura et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052566 | Kato | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055582 | Bazakos et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063567 | Saitoh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050084137 | Kim et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084179 | Hanna et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099288 | Spitz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102502 | Sagen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110610 | Bazakos et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125258 | Yellin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050127161 | Smith et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129286 | Hekimian | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134796 | Zelvin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138385 | Friedli et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138387 | Lam et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146640 | Shibata | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151620 | Neumann | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152583 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193212 | Yuhara | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199708 | Friedman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206501 | Farhat | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206502 | Bernitz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207614 | Schonberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210267 | Sugano et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210270 | Rohatgi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210271 | Chou et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238214 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240778 | Saito | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248725 | Ikoma et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249385 | Kondo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255840 | Markham | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060093190 | Cheng et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147094 | Yoo | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165266 | Hamza | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060274919 | LoIacono et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070036397 | Hamza | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070160266 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189582 | Hamza et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206840 | Jacobson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211924 | Hamza | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070274570 | Hamza | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274571 | Hamza | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286590 | Terashima | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005578 | Shafir | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080075334 | Determan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075441 | Jelinek et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080104415 | Palti-Wasserman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148030 | Goffin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080211347 | Wright et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080252412 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267456 | Anderson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046899 | Northcott et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090092283 | Whillock et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090316993 | Brasnett et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002913 | Hamza | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033677 | Jelinek | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034529 | Jelinek | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100142765 | Hamza | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182440 | McCloskey | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100239119 | Bazakos et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0484076 | May 1992 | EP |
0593386 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0878780 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0899680 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0910986 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0962894 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1018297 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1024463 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1028398 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1041506 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1041523 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1126403 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1139270 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1237117 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1477925 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1635307 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2369205 | May 2002 | GB |
2371396 | Jul 2002 | GB |
2375913 | Nov 2002 | GB |
2402840 | Dec 2004 | GB |
2411980 | Sep 2005 | GB |
9161135 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9198545 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9201348 | Aug 1997 | JP |
9147233 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9234264 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9305765 | Nov 1997 | JP |
9319927 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10021392 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10040386 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10049728 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10137219 | May 1998 | JP |
10137221 | May 1998 | JP |
10137222 | May 1998 | JP |
10137223 | May 1998 | JP |
10248827 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10269183 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11047117 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11089820 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11200684 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11203478 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11213047 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11339037 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000005149 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000005150 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000011163 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000023946 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000083930 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000102510 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000102524 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000105830 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000107156 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000139878 | May 2000 | JP |
2000155863 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000182050 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000185031 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000194972 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000237167 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000242788 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000259817 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000356059 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000357232 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001005948 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001067399 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001101429 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001167275 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001222661 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001292981 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001297177 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001358987 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002119477 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002133415 | May 2002 | JP |
2002153444 | May 2002 | JP |
2002153445 | May 2002 | JP |
2002260071 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002271689 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002286650 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002312772 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002329204 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003006628 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003036434 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003108720 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003108983 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003132355 | May 2003 | JP |
2003150942 | May 2003 | JP |
2003153880 | May 2003 | JP |
2003242125 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003271565 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003271940 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003308522 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003308523 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003317102 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003331265 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004005167 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004021406 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004030334 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004038305 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004094575 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004152046 | May 2004 | JP |
2004163356 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004164483 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004171350 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004171602 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004206444 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004220376 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004261515 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004280221 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004280547 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004287621 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004315127 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004318248 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005004524 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005011207 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005025577 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005038257 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005062990 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005115961 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005148883 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005242677 | Sep 2005 | JP |
WO 9717674 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9721188 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9802083 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9808439 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9932317 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9952422 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 9965175 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0028484 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0029986 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0031677 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0036605 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0062239 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0101329 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0103100 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0128476 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0135348 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0135349 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0140982 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0163994 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0169490 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0186599 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0201451 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0219030 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0235452 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 0235480 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02091735 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02095657 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03002387 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03003910 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03054777 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03077077 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004029863 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004042646 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004055737 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004089214 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004097743 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005008567 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013181 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024698 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024708 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024709 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005029388 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062235 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069252 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005093510 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005093681 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005096962 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098531 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005104704 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005109344 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006012645 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006023046 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006051462 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006063076 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006081209 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006081505 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007101269 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007101275 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007101276 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007103698 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007103701 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007103833 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007103834 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008016724 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008019168 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008019169 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008021584 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008031089 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008040026 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070140531 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60647270 | Jan 2005 | US | |
60778770 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11275703 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11675424 | US | |
Parent | 11675424 | US | |
Child | 11675424 | US | |
Parent | 11672108 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 11675424 | US | |
Parent | 11372854 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11672108 | US | |
Parent | 11043366 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11372854 | US |