The present invention relates to staples for generating, applying, and maintaining compression to a site in a human or animal body in order to facilitate healing of diseased or damaged tissue. The invention finds particular utility in the field of orthopedics and specifically for reducing fractures and maintaining compression between bone fragments. While the invention has application throughout the body, its utility will be illustrated herein in the context of the repair of fractured or displaced bone tissue, such as during an Akin Osteotomy of the foot or an Isolated Lunocapitate Arthrodesis of the hand/wrist.
In the field of orthopedic surgery it is common to rejoin broken bones. The success of the surgical procedure often depends on the ability to reaproximate the fractured bones, the amount of compression achieved between the bone fragments, and the ability to sustain that compression over a period of time. If the surgeon is unable to bring the bone fragments into close contact, a gap will exist between the bone fragments and the bone tissue will need to fill that gap before complete healing can take place. Furthermore, gaps between bone fragments that are too large allow motion to occur between the bone fragments, disrupting the healing tissue and thus slowing the healing process. Optimal healing requires that the bone fragments be in close contact with each other, and for a compressive load to be applied and maintained between the bone fragments. Compressive strain between bone fragments has been found to accelerate the healing process in accordance with Wolf's Law.
Broken bones can be rejoined using staples. Staples are formed from a plurality of legs (typically two legs, though sometimes more) connected together by a bridge. Staples are typically manufactured from either stainless steel alloys, titanium alloys or Nitinol, a shape memory alloy. The staples are inserted into pre-drilled holes on either side of the fracture site.
While these staples are designed to bring the bone fragments into close contact and to generate a compressive load between the bone fragments, the staples do not always succeed in accomplishing this objective. It is widely reported that the compressive load of staples dissipates rapidly as the bone relaxes and remodels around the legs of the staples.
Thus there exists a clinical need for fixation devices that are able to bring bone fragments into close proximity with each other, generate a compressive load, and maintain that compressive load for a prolonged period of time while healing occurs.
Moreover, existing staples have bridges that are fixed in size, shape, and dimension, while each procedure presents a unique anatomical requirement (which is set by a combination of indication and patient-specific anatomy). Existing staples with fixed shape and dimension bridges will often sit “proud” of the cortical bone, resulting in irritated and inflamed adjacent soft tissue and, in some cases, bursitis.
Thus there also exists a clinical need for a staple with a malleable bridge that may be bent so as to conform to the unique anatomical structure of each patient and sit flush on the cortical surface of the bone.
The present invention provides a novel fixation device which is able to bring bone fragments into close proximity with each other, generate a compressive load, and maintain that compressive load for a prolonged period of time while healing occurs.
Among other things, the present invention comprises the provision and use of a novel monolithic staple which is manufactured from a single piece of shape memory material (e.g., a material capable of exhibiting superelasticity and/or a temperature-induced shape change). The shape memory material may be a metal alloy (e.g., Nitinol) or a polymer (e.g., appropriately processed PEEK). The staple is designed to reduce fractures and generate and maintain more uniform compression between the cortical bone and cancellous bone of the bone fragments to aid in fracture healing.
In one form of the invention, the staple comprises an elastic bridge and two elastic legs. The bridge and the legs meet at a pair of curved hinge regions which are also elastic. In the un-restrained state, the legs of the staple are bent inward with an angle of less than 90°. Prior to implantation, the bridge of the staple can be reversibly strained outward (i.e., stretched longitudinally outward) and the legs of the staple can be reversibly bent to a position perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the bridge so as to allow for insertion of the staple into a prepared fracture site. A delivery device may be used to strain the bridge, bend the legs to parallel, hold the staple in this strained state prior to implantation, and insert the strained staple into the prepared fracture site. The constraint on the bridge and legs is removed, whereupon the bridge and legs attempt to return to their original unrestrained state, thereby generating a greater, and more uniform, compressive load and maintaining that greater, and more uniform, compressive load for a prolonged period of time while healing occurs.
In another form of the invention, the staple comprises a malleable bridge and two elastic legs. The bridge and the legs meet at a pair of curved hinge regions which are also elastic. In the unrestrained state, the legs of the staple are bent inward with an angle of less than 90°. Prior to implantation, the malleable bridge may be deformed so that it conforms to the unique anatomical structure of the patient, such that it will sit flush with the cortical surface of the bone after implantation. And prior to implantation, the legs of the staple can be reversibly bent to a position perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the bridge so as to allow for insertion of the staple into a prepared fracture site. A bending device may be used to deform the bridge, and a delivery device may be used to hold the deformed bridge, bend the legs, hold the staple in this state prior to implantation, and insert the staple into the bone, with the bridge of the staple extending across the fracture line. Alternatively, a combined bending/delivery device may be used to deform the bridge, bend the legs, hold the staple in this condition prior to implantation, and insert the staple into the bone, with the bridge of the staple extending across the fracture line. Upon insertion of the deformed and strained staple into the prepared fracture site, the constraint on the legs of the staple is removed, whereupon the legs of the staple attempt to return to their original unrestrained state, thereby generating a compressive load and maintaining that compressive load for a prolonged period of time while healing occurs. Significantly, the deformed bridge of the staple can be matched to the unique anatomical structure of the patient, such that the bridge of the staple will sit flush with the cortical surface of the bone.
Additionally, it is possible that where the staple comprises a malleable bridge with two elastic legs, the staple can be inserted into the fracture site prior to bending the bridge. The bridge can be bent after implantation using a tamp-like device of the sort known in the art.
In one preferred form of the invention, there is provided a staple comprising:
a bridge configured to be elastically stretchable;
a first leg connected to said bridge and configured to be elastically bendable; and
a second leg connected to said bridge and configured to be elastically bendable;
said first and second legs being connected to said bridge so that they are angled toward one another when they are in an unstrained state;
such that when said bridge is elastically strained into an elongated condition, and said first and second legs are elastically strained so that they extend substantially parallel to one another, and said first and second legs are disposed in appropriate holes on opposing sides of a fracture line, and when the strain on said staple is thereafter released, compression will be provided across the fracture line by both said bridge and said first and second legs.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for providing compression across a fracture line, the method comprising:
providing a staple comprising:
elastically straining said bridge into an elongated condition, and elastically straining said first and second legs so that they extend substantially parallel to one another;
inserting said first and second legs in appropriate holes on opposing sides of a fracture line; and
releasing the strain on said staple so that compression is provided across the fracture line by both said bridge and said first and second legs.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a staple comprising:
a malleable bridge configured to be inelastically deformed;
a first leg connected to said bridge and configured to be elastically bendable; and
a second leg connected to said bridge and configured to be elastically bendable;
said first and second legs being connected to said bridge so that they are angled toward one another when they are in an unstrained state;
such that when said bridge is inelastically deformed, and said first and second legs are elastically strained so that they extend substantially parallel to one another, and said first and second legs are disposed in appropriate holes on opposing sides of a fracture line, and when the strain on said staple is thereafter released, compression will be provided across the fracture line by said first and second legs.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for providing compression across a fracture line, the method comprising:
providing a staple comprising:
inelastically deforming said bridge, and elastically straining said first and second legs so that they extend substantially parallel to one another;
inserting said first and second legs in appropriate holes on opposing sides of a fracture line; and
releasing the strain on said staple so that compression is provided across the fracture line by said first and second legs.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts, and further wherein:
Looking first at
Novel staple 5 is preferably an integral, monolithic structure manufactured from a single piece of shape memory material (e.g., a material capable of exhibiting superelasticity and/or a temperature-induced shape change). The shape memory material may be a metal alloy (e.g., Nitinol) or a polymer (e.g., appropriately processed PEEK). Staple 5 is designed to reduce fractures and generate and maintain greater, and more uniform, compression between bone fragments to aid in fracture healing. Staple 5 comprises an elastic bridge 10 and two elastic legs 15. Bridge 10 and legs 15 meet at a pair of curved hinge regions 20 which are also elastic. Legs 15 may have barbed teeth 25 to help the legs of the staple grip into the bone after implantation (see below) and prevent the legs of the staple from working their way back out of the bone. In the un-restrained state, legs 15 of staple 5 are bent inward with an angle of less than 90°. By way of example but not limitation, in one preferred form of the invention, legs 15 extend at an angle of about 45° to the longitudinal axis of bridge 10 when in their unrestrained state.
Prior to implantation, bridge 10 of staple 5 can be reversibly strained outward (i.e., stretched longitudinally) and legs 15 of staple 5 can be reversibly bent to a position substantially perpendicular to bridge 10 (
Upon insertion of the strained staple 5 into the prepared fracture site, the constraint on bridge 10 and legs 15 is removed, whereupon staple 5 attempts to return to its original un-restrained state (
Looking next at
Note that with delivery device 30, the delivery device is constructed so that upon squeezing handles 45, the legs of the staple are first bent to perpendicular and then, when the legs of the staple are substantially perpendicular, the bridge of the staple is elongated.
Note that staple 5 is configured so that the force that is generated as staple 5 reconfigures (i.e., as bridge 10 foreshortens and legs 15 bend inward) is less than the “tear through” force of the bone receiving legs 15, i.e., staple 5 is specifically engineered so as to not “tear through” the bone tissue when attempting to reconfigure. Delivery device 30 preferably includes the aforementioned locking feature 55 which enables the surgeon to control the extent to which the staple is strained (e.g., to bend only the legs of the staple, or to both bend the legs of the staple and strain the bridge of the staple, and to control the extent to which the bridge is stretched), thereby allowing the surgeon to tailor the compressive forces and recoverable strain imposed on the anatomy, depending on bone quality. The compressive forces of staple 5 can be controlled by modulating the material properties of the staple and/or the geometry of the staple.
The percentage of cold work in the shape memory material forming staple 5 affects the compressive force generated by the reconfiguring staple. As the percentage of cold work increases, the compression force declines. A staple should, preferably, have between about 15% and 55% cold work to control the recovery force of the staple; however, other degrees of cold work may be used, and/or the material may not be cold worked at all.
Another material property that affects the staple's compression force is the temperature differential between the body that the staple will be implanted into (assumed to be 37° C., which is the temperature of a human body) and the austenite finish temperature of the shape memory material forming staple 5. A smaller temperature differential between the two will result in the staple generating a smaller compressive load; conversely, a larger temperature differential between the two will result in the staple generating a larger compressive load. The shape memory material that the staple is made out of should, preferably, have an austenite finish temperature of greater than about −10° C., resulting in a temperature differential of about 47° C. when the staple is implanted (assuming that the staple is implanted in a human body).
Staple geometry also affects the compression forces generated. The cross-sectional area of bridge 10, and the cross-sectional area of legs 15, affects the compression forces generated by the reconfiguring staple. As the cross-sectional areas increase, so do the compression forces that the reconfiguring staple will generate.
The staple legs are critical for transmitting the compression force to the bone without “tearing through” the bone. The height, width, and length of the staple legs, and the geometry of the staple legs, are all significant relative to the staple's ability to not “tear through” the bone. Staple legs with greater surface area are better able to distribute the compression force and thus not “tear through” the bone.
More particularly, the fracture 90 to be fused is first re-approximated and reduced. A drill guide (not shown) of the sort well known in the art is used to drill two holes 95 the correct distance apart to accommodate the legs 15 of the strained staple 5. Staple 5 is loaded onto delivery device 30, and delivery device 30 is used to stretch bridge 10 and straighten legs 15 of staple 5 (i.e., by squeezing together handles 45). While still on delivery device 30, legs 15 of staple 5 are placed into the pre-drilled holes 95. Staple 5 is then released from delivery device 30, which allows the stretched bridge 10 of staple 5 to foreshorten so as to apply compression to the fracture line, and which allows the strained legs 15 of staple 5 to “kick in” and thereby apply additional inward pressure across the fracture line 90. Thus, staple 5 applies more uniform compression across the fracture site, generating compression across both the cortical and intramedullary surfaces, using the compressive forces generated by the foreshortening bridge 10 of the strained staple 5 and using the compressive forces generated by inwardly bending legs 15 of the strained staple 5.
Significantly, when bridge 10 and legs 15 of staple 5 generate a compressive force, both the cortical regions of the bone fragments and the cancellous regions of the bone fragments are pulled together. This provides a superior balance of compression across different regions of the bone.
It should also be appreciated that, if desired, staple 5 can be used to attach soft tissue to bone (e.g., to attach a rotator cuff to bone).
It should be appreciated that delivery device 30 may not always seat the staple with the bridge of the staple seated directly against the cortical surface of the bone (i.e., the bridge of the staple may sit slightly above the cortical surface of the bone). Therefore, a tamp of the sort well known in the art may be used to fully seat the staple bridge against the cortical surface of the bone.
In some circumstances it can be desirable to modify delivery device 30 so as to ensure that legs 15 do not be bent past 90 degrees (relative to the longitudinal axis of bridge 10) when staple 5 is strained. More particularly, in some constructions, staple 5 can require more force to stretch bridge 10 than to bend legs 15. In this circumstance, there is the possibility that legs 15 will be bent to 90 degrees (relative to the longitudinal axis of bridge 10) and then, as bridge 10 is stretched, legs 15 may be bent past 90 degrees (relative to the longitudinal axis of bridge 10). Therefore, it can be desirable to provide means for preventing legs 15 from being bent past 90 degrees (relative to the longitudinal axis of bridge 10). To this end, and looking now at
In one preferred form of the invention, staple 5 and delivery device 30 are provided in the form of a sterilized kit. The kit may include additional instruments to aid in the implantation of the staple (e.g., k-wire, drill bit, staple size guide, tamp, etc.).
In the foregoing discussion, staple 5 is strained so that, upon deployment in the bone, it will provide compression across a fracture line. However, it should also be appreciated that, if desired, staple 5 can be configured to provide a distraction force to a bone. In this situation, staple 5 can be configured and strained so that bridge 10 can be compressed, and/or legs 15 can be bent outward, such that when staple 5 is deployed in bone, the reconfiguring staple can apply a distraction force to the bone, whereby to cause the bone to grow and thereby elongate.
As discussed above, staple 5 is manufactured from a shape memory material (e.g., a material capable of exhibiting superelasticity and/or a temperature-induced shape change). The shape memory material may be a metal alloy (e.g., Nitinol) or a polymer (e.g, appropriately processed PEEK). In this respect it should be appreciated that staple 5 can be manufactured out of a single piece of shape memory material (i.e., so as to create an integral, monolithic structure), and the different regions of the staple worked differently, in a metallurgical sense, so that different regions of the staple have different mechanical properties and exhibit different mechanical characteristics, even as they form a single, integral, monolithic structure.
In one form of the invention, and as discussed above, staple 5 can be manufactured so that bridge 10 is elastic, legs 15 are elastic, and curved hinge regions 20 are elastic, in which case bridge 10 can be elastically deformed, and legs 15 can be elastically deformed, so that both bridge 10 and legs 15 provide compression to the fracture site after implantation. In this form of the invention, bridge 10 and legs 15 may be worked, metallurgically, so that they have the same or different mechanical properties.
However, in another form of the invention, staple 5 can be manufactured so that bridge 10 is malleable and non-superelastic (e.g., fully annealed Nitinol, or martensitic Nitinol with an austenite start temperature greater than body temperature), and legs 15 and hinge regions 20 are superelastic (e.g., austenite but capable of forming stress-induced martensite). This allows the malleable bridge 10 of staple 5 to be inelastically bent (i.e., to take a set) to accommodate a particular geometry of the cortical anatomy, while still allowing the superelastic legs 15 of the staple to generate compression. By way of example but not limitation, many bones exhibit an hour-glass surface profile; moreover, certain orthopedic indications (e.g., an Akin Osteotomy) often results in a cortical surface that is concave when the bones are re-approximated. In these situations, a staple with a straight bridge will not sit flush on the bone surface, which can lead to patient discomfort. In this respect it should also be appreciated that where bridge 10 is malleable and legs 15 are superelastic, legs 15 of staple 5 may be manufactured at a more acute angle (
See
It may be desirable for staple 5 to start with a bridge that is convex, e.g., such as the staple 5 shown in
Thus, in a second form of the invention, staple 5 is formed out of a single piece of shape memory material (i.e., so as to form a single, integral, monolithic structure), with the shape memory material being worked so that bridge 10 is malleable (e.g., fully annealed Nitinol, or martensitic Nitinol with an austenite start temperature greater than body temperature) and legs 15 are superelastic (e.g., austenite but capable of forming stress-induced martensite), such that bridge 10 of staple 5 may be bent to contour to the surface of the bone while the compressive force generated by the superelastic legs 15 of the staple are used to help fuse the bone.
A bending device can be used to bend bridge 10 of staple 5 prior to implantation of the staple. An exemplary bending device 100 is shown in
More particularly,
After the bridge of the staple has been bent to the desired geometry (e.g., the geometry shown in
Plier assembly 130 is also used to insert the staple into the bone after the legs of the staple have been strained open to substantially parallel.
Looking now at
With the bridge of the staple inelastically bent into the appropriate configuration and with the legs of the staple elastically strained to substantially parallel, the staple can be inserted into the pre-drilled holes 175 in bone fragments 165, 170. The staple is then released from plier assembly 130 and tamped to sit flush with the cortical surface, with the inelastically bent bridge 10 of the staple more closely matching the surface contour of the bone. The elastically-strained superelastic legs 15 of the staple applies a compressive force across the fracture.
If desired, where the staple is provided with a malleable bridge, the malleable bridge may be bent, or further bent, after the staple has been deployed in bone, e.g., to match, or to more closely match, the surface profile of the bone.
In some circumstances the bone may have a convex profile. In this circumstance, it may be desirable to set the staple so that its bridge has a convex configuration. To this end, and looking now at
It should also be appreciated that, if desired, staple 5 can be used to attach soft tissue to bone (e.g., to attach a rotator cuff to bone).
It should be appreciated that delivery device 130 discussed above may not always seat the staple with the bridge of the staple seated directly against the cortical surface of the bone (i.e., the bridge of the staple may sit slightly above the cortical surface of the bone). Therefore, a tamp of the sort well known in the art may be used to fully seat the staple bridge against the cortical surface of the bone.
In one preferred form of the invention, staple 5, bending device 100 and/or bending device 180, and delivery device (i.e., plier assembly) 130 are provided in the form of a sterilized kit. The kit may include additional instruments to aid in the implantation of the staple (e.g., k-wire, drill bit, staple size guide, tamp, etc.).
Conventional shape memory staples typically generate between about 20N and about 120N of compressive force from the staple legs kicking inward.
The novel staple of the present invention having a stretched bridge as described herein generates a compressive load of greater than the 20N to 120N generated by other like-sized conventional staples, thereby providing significantly increased compressive forces without tearing through or otherwise damaging the bone. Additionally, the compressive force provided by the stretched bridge staple of the present invention is more uniformly distributed across the fracture line (i.e., across the cortical bone and the cancellous bone).
It should be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the present invention, may be made by those skilled in the art while still remaining within the principles and scope of the invention.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/540,351 filed on Nov. 13, 2014, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/903,820, filed Nov. 13, 2013, which patent application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2580821 | Nicola | Jan 1952 | A |
3960147 | Murray | Jun 1976 | A |
4175555 | Herbert | Nov 1979 | A |
4428376 | Mericle | Jan 1984 | A |
4444181 | Wevers et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4503569 | Dotter | Mar 1985 | A |
4512338 | Balko et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4570623 | Ellison et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4858601 | Glisson | Aug 1989 | A |
4905679 | Morgan | Mar 1990 | A |
4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
4950227 | Savin et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4959064 | Engelhardt | Sep 1990 | A |
4959065 | Arnett et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5026390 | Brown | Jun 1991 | A |
5044540 | Dulebohn | Sep 1991 | A |
5061275 | Wallsten et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5089006 | Stiles | Feb 1992 | A |
5098434 | Serbousek | Mar 1992 | A |
5190546 | Jervis | Mar 1993 | A |
5246443 | Mai | Sep 1993 | A |
5474557 | Mai | Dec 1995 | A |
5607530 | Hall et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5680981 | Mililli et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5766218 | Arnott | Jun 1998 | A |
5779707 | Bertholet et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5876434 | Flomenblit et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5947999 | Groiso | Sep 1999 | A |
6030162 | Huebner | Feb 2000 | A |
6048344 | Schenk | Apr 2000 | A |
6187009 | Herzog et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6306140 | Siddiqui | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325805 | Ogilvie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6533157 | Whitman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6569173 | Blatter et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607530 | Carl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623486 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656184 | White et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685708 | Monassevitch et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6761731 | Majercak | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773437 | Ogilvie et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7175626 | Neff | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7229452 | Kayan | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7481832 | Meridew et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7582107 | Trail et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618441 | Groiso | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625395 | Muckter | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7794483 | Capanni | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7875070 | Molaei | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7955388 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976648 | Boylan et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7985222 | Gall et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7993380 | Hawkes | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8048134 | Partin | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080044 | Biedermann et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8114141 | Appenzeller et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118952 | Gall et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137351 | Prandi | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8205782 | Harari et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216398 | Bledsoe et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221478 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8393517 | Milo | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8425588 | Molaei | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8486121 | Biedermann et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8584853 | Knight et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597337 | Champagne | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8721646 | Fox | May 2014 | B2 |
8790379 | Bottlang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801732 | Harris et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808294 | Fox et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8864804 | Champagne et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9017331 | Fox | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9095338 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9101349 | Knight et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9138274 | Biesinger et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9204932 | Knight et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9326804 | Biedermann et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9339268 | Fox | May 2016 | B2 |
9402624 | Scott et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9408647 | Cheney | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9451955 | Fox | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9451957 | Fox | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20020058940 | Frigg et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111641 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020198527 | Muckter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040111089 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040230193 | Cheung et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260377 | Flomenblit et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043757 | Arad et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096660 | Allen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152770 | Tschakaloff et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050277940 | Neff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288707 | De Canniere et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060264954 | Sweeney, II et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070233124 | Corrao et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260248 | Tipirneni | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265631 | Fox | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270855 | Partin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080065154 | Allard | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071373 | Molz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080132894 | Coilard-Lavirotte et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080234763 | Patterson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249574 | McCombs et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090018556 | Prandi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090105768 | Cragg et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090198287 | Chiu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090254090 | Lizee | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264937 | Parrott | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090302089 | Harari et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036430 | Hartdegen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063506 | Fox | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087822 | Groiso | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131014 | Peyrot et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100211115 | Tyber et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100237128 | Miller et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110008643 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060372 | Allison | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110144703 | Krause et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110224725 | De Canniere et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247731 | Gordon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110313473 | Prandi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120116465 | Elahinia et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130030437 | Fox | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030438 | Fox | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130066435 | Averous et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123785 | Fonte | May 2013 | A1 |
20130206815 | Fox | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231667 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130300437 | Grosjean et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140014553 | Knight et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018809 | Allen | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020333 | Knight et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140024002 | Knight et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140097228 | Taylor | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140172026 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140257420 | Fox | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277516 | Miller et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324048 | Fox | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140358187 | Taber et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140358247 | Fox et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150133940 | Palmer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150230843 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238237 | Madjarov | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238238 | Cheney | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160051284 | Cronen | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160089190 | Taber | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095638 | Reimels | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160135808 | Anderson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160199060 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160235460 | Wahl | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160317202 | Cheney | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170000482 | Averous et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170231625 | Handie | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252036 | Palmer et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170340777 | Ma et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170347999 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0826340 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2787313 | Jun 2000 | FR |
2874166 | Feb 2006 | FR |
2901119 | Nov 2007 | FR |
64726 | Feb 1985 | IL |
2009091770 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2014087111 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cai, S. et al., Texture evolution during nitinol martensite detwinning and phase transformation, Applied Physics Letters 103, 241909 (2013). |
Gruszka, Dominik et al., The Durability of the Intrascaphoid Compression of Headless Compression Screws: In Vitro Study, The Journal of Hand Surgery, Jun. 2012, pp. 1142-1150. |
Huang et al., Ion release from NiTi orthodontic wires in artificial saliva with various acidities, Biomaterials, 24, 2003, pp. 3585-3592. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application 14861059.5 dated Sep. 6, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/065406 dated May 17, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/065553 dated May 17, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/020598 dated Sep. 13, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/028328 dated Nov. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/015432 dated Aug. 10, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/065406 dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/065553 dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/020598 dated Jun. 12, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/028328 dated Aug. 4, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/015432 dated Apr. 21, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/023980 dated Jul. 21, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,650 dated Apr. 18, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,351 dated Apr. 19, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/650,210 dated Oct. 4, 2017. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/699,837 dated Sep. 13, 2017. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application 14862438.0 dated Jun. 12, 2017. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application No. 14861238.5 dated Jun. 12, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/699,837, filed Apr. 29, 2015, entitled “Controlling the Unloading Stress of Nitinol Devices and/or Other Shape Memory Material Devices”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/079,770, filed Mar. 24, 2016, entitled “Staples for Generating and Applying Compression Within a Body”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,650, filed Nov. 12, 2014, entitled “Screws for Generating and Applying Compression Within a Body”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,351, filed Nov. 13, 2014, entitled “Staples for Generating and Applying Compression Within a Body”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/650,210, filed Jul. 14, 2017, entitled “Staples for Generating and Applying Compression Within a Body”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,530, filed Jul. 17, 2017, entitled “Staples for Generating and Applying Compression Within a Body”. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/023980 dated Oct. 5, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/699,837, dated Jan. 16, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170347999 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61903820 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14540351 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15684183 | US |