1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to remote control devices and more specifically it relates to a state-based remote control system for providing efficient and simple operation of a plurality of electronic devices as a coordinated system based upon an overall task.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Remote control devices have been in use for years. Remote control devices are utilized to operate various external electronic devices including but not limited to televisions, stereos, receivers, VCRso, DVD players, CD players, amplifiers, equalizers, tape players, cable units, lighting, window shades and other electronic devices. A conventional remote control is typically comprised of a housing structure, a keypad within the housing structure for entering commands by the user, electronic circuitry within the housing structure connected to the keypad, and a transmitter electrically connected to the electronic circuitry for transmitting a control signal to an electronic device to be operated.
The user depresses one or more buttons upon the keypad when a desired operation of a specific electronic device is desired. For example, if the user desires to turn the power off to a VCR, the user will depress the power button upon the remote control which transmits a “power off” control signal that is detected by the VCR resulting in the VCR turning off.
Because of the multiple electronic devices currently available within many homes and businesses today, a relatively new type of remote control is utilized to allow for the control of a plurality of electronic devices commonly referred to as a “universal remote control.” Most universal remote controls have “selector buttons” that are associated with the specific electronic device to be controlled by the remote control (i.e., television, VCR, DVD player, etc.).
Example: A few universal remote controls allow for “macros” to be programmed into the remote control so that when a preprogrammed button is depressed a string of commands is executed as programmed. For example, if the user desires to operate their television along with the stereo receiving input from the television, the user would program a macro for turning on the television, turning on the stereo and then switching the input to the stereo for receiving audio input from the television. The main problem with conventional universal remote controls is that they are unable to detect or monitor the state of a particular electronic device. Another problem with conventional universal remote controls is that when a preprogrammed macro is executed, an undesirable effect can occur wherein electronic devices that are desired to be turned on are actually turned off. For example, if the television is already on but the stereo is tuned to a .local radio station and the user selects the above macro the power to the television would actually be turned off instead of maintained on.
Recently, universal remote controls have been developed that communicate via radio frequency (RF) with external sensing devices that are connected to the electronic devices for detecting the current state of the electronic device. Other remote controls are able to receive and display information from the electronic device they control such as displaying the name of a radio station on a display of the remote. These devices are relatively expensive and again difficult to utilize for the average consumer.
The main problem with conventional remote control devices is that they are typically unable to know the particular “state” of an electronic device they are to control, particularly universal remote controls. A further problem with conventional remote controls that do allow for advanced configuration thereof to compensate for the various states of the electronic device is that they are often times difficult for the average consumer to utilize. Another problem with conventional remote control devices is that they force consumers to heir electronic devices “individually” (i.e., turn television on, turn stereo on, switch audio input on stereo to television) rather than in broad “tasks” (e.g., watch television).
While these devices may be suitable for the particular purpose to which they address, they are not as suitable for providing efficient and simple operation of a plurality of electronic devices as a coordinated system based upon an overall task. Conventional remote controls are typically programmed to operate only one electronic device. Conventional universal remote controls are typically programmed to operate electronic devices “individually” or are difficult to configure to automated control of a plurality of electronic devices.
In these respects, the state-based remote control system according to the present invention substantially departs from the conventional concepts and designs of the prior art, and in so doing provides an apparatus primarily developed for the purpose of providing efficient and simple operation of a plurality of electronic devices as a coordinated system based upon an overall task.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages inherent in the known types of remote controls now present in the prior art, the present invention provides a new state-based remote control system construction wherein the same can be utilized for providing efficient and simple operation of a plurality of electronic devices as a coordinated system based upon an overall task.
The general purpose of the present invention, which will be described subsequently in greater detail, is to provide a new state-based remote control system that has many of the advantages of the remote controls mentioned heretofore and many novel features that result in a new state-based remote control system which is not anticipated, rendered obvious, suggested, or even implied by any of the prior art remote controls, either alone or in any combination thereof.
To attain this, the present invention generally comprises a housing, a keypad in communication with an electronic system contained within the housing, and a communication device in communication with the electronic system for communicating with external electronic devices. The electronic system constantly monitors the buttons selected by a user to determine the state of all external electronic devices that are to be controlled. When the user selects a task (e.g., watch television), the electronic system automatically determines the actions required to achieve the desired task based upon the current state of the external electronic devices. After the task has been fulfilled, the electronic system updates the data to reflect the modified state of the external electronic devices.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are additional features of the invention that will be described hereinafter and that will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of the description and should not be regarded as limiting.
A primary object of the present invention is to provide a state-based remote control system that will overcome the shortcomings of the prior art devices.
A second object is to provide a state-based remote control system for providing efficient and simple operation of a plurality of electronic devices as a coordinated system based upon an overall task.
Another object is to provide a state-based remote control system that provides for intuitive operation of a plurality of electronic devices.
An additional object is to provide a state-based remote control system that allows for the simple operation of a plurality of electronic devices based upon an 25 overall “task” instead of specific controls for specific electronic devices.
A further object is to provide a state-based remote control system that is simple and easy to utilize for the average consumer.
Another object is to provide a state-based remote control system that does not require significant programming prior to usage.
An additional object is to provide a state-based remote control system that is affordable.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become obvious to the reader and it is intended that these objects and advantages are within the scope of the present invention.
To the accomplishment of the above and related objects, this invention may be embodied in the form illustrated in the accompanying drawings, attention being called to the fact, however, that the drawings are illustrative only, and that changes may be made in the specific construction illustrated and described within the scope of the appended claims.
Various other objects, features and attendant advantages of the present invention will become fully appreciated as the same becomes better understood when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
a-11b is a flowchart providing an example task for watching television being executed
Turning now descriptively to the drawings, in which similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views,
A. Housing Structure
The present invention generally is comprised of a housing 20 having a structure and shape similar to conventional remote control devices. The housing 20 may be constructed of various types of materials and shapes as can be appreciated by one skilled in the art. The housing is preferably structured to be ergonomic for a majority of users.
B. Electronic System
The present invention is utilized to control and operate various external electronic devices including but not limited to televisions, stereos, receivers, VCRs, DVD players, CD players, amplifiers, equalizers, tape players, cable units, satellite dish receivers, lighting, window shades and other electronic devices. Almost any number of external electronic devices may be controlled by the present invention as will be discussed in further detail.
The electronic system 100 preferably includes a display screen 104, a network interface 112, a keypad 114, a microprocessor 116, a memory bus 118, random access memory (RAM) 120, a speaker 102, read only memory (ROM) 122, a peripheral bus 124, a keypad controller 126, and a communications device 108. As can be appreciated, the electronic system 100 of the present invention may be comprised of any combination of well-known computer devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, remote control devices and other similar electronic structures.
The microprocessor 116 is a general-purpose digital processor that controls the operation of the electronic system 100. The microprocessor 116 can be a single-chip processor or implemented with multiple components. Using instructions retrieved from memory, the microprocessor 116 controls the reception and manipulations of input data and the output and display of data on output devices.
The memory bus 118 is utilized by the microprocessor 116 to access RAM 120 and ROM 122. RAM 120 is used by microprocessor 116 as a general storage area and as scratch-pad memory, and can also be used to store input data and processed data. ROM 122 can be used to store instructions or program code followed by microprocessor 116 as well as other data.
Peripheral bus 124 is used to access the input, output and storage devices used by the electronic system 100. In the described embodiment(s), these devices include a display screen 104, an accessory device 106, a speaker 102, a communications device 108, and a network interface 112. A keypad controller 126 is used to receive input from the keypad 114 and send decoded symbols for each pressed key to microprocessor 116 over bus 128.
The display screen 104 is an output device that displays images of data provided by the microprocessor 116 via the peripheral bus 124 or provided by other components in the electronic system 100. Other output devices such as a printer, plotter, typesetter, etc. can be utilized as an accessory device 106.
The microprocessor 116 together with an operating system operate to execute computer code and produce and use data. The computer code and data may reside on RAM 120, ROM 122, or other storage mediums. The computer code and data could also reside on a removable program medium and loaded or installed onto the electronic system 100 when needed. Removable program mediums include, for example, PC-CARD, flash memory, and floppy disk.
The network interface 112 is utilized to send and receive data over a network connected to other electronic systems. The network interface may be comprised of a Universal Serial Bus (USB), an external bus standard that supports data transfer rates of 12 Mbps (12 million bits per second). A single USB port can be used to connect up to 127 peripheral devices, such as mice, modems, and keyboards. An interface card or similar device and appropriate software implemented by microprocessor 116 can be utilized to connect the electronic system 100 to an existing network and transfer data according to standard protocols including data over a global computer network such as the Internet.
The keypad 114 is used by a user to input commands and other instructions to the electronic system 100. Other types of user input devices can also be used in conjunction with the present invention. For example, pointing devices such as a computer mouse, a jog switch 22, a track ball, a stylus, or a tablet to manipulate a pointer on a screen of the electronic system 100.
The present invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can be thereafter be read by a electronic system. Examples of the computer readable medium include read-only memory, random-access memory, magnetic data storage devices such as diskettes, and optical data storage devices such as CD-ROMs. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network coupled electronic systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
The communications device 108 may be comprised of any well-known communication system that allows communications with external electronic devices. The communications device 108 may provide for various types of communication such as but not limited to via infrared (IR), wireless (e.g., BLUETOOTH), unidirectional, bidirectional, radio frequency (RF), visible light, ultrasonic and various other means for communicating with external electronic devices.
The environmental unit 110 senses environmental information such as lighting, motion, orientation, temperature, audio and other environmental information. The environmental unit 110 communicates the detected environmental information to the microprocessor 116 for consideration in controlling the external electronic devices. The environmental unit 110 includes the appropriate sensors such as light sensors, temperature sensors, sound sensors and other desirable sensors to determine the environment conditions external of the housing.
Input into the electronic system is accomplished mainly through the usage of the keypad 114. The keypad 114 includes a plurality of buttons that allow the user to execute one or more commands. The keypad 114 allows for the control of basic functions such as volume, channel manipulation, mute, and last channel. However, the keypad 114 may also include several buttons that represent a specific task such as watch television, listen to radio and various other tasks. Various other input devices may be utilized to input data into the electronic system such as a jog switch 22 (i.e., dial), motion and orientation detectors, touch sensitive screens and voice recognition. The display 104 provides information to the user such as possible tasks to complete or the current state of the external electronic devices.
C. Initializing/Synchronizing of Electronic System with External Devices
Prior to utilizing the present invention, the user must program the electronic system 100 to not only recognize all of the external electronic devices 12 to be controlled but also as to each external electronic device 12 respective current “states” (i.e., on, off, current input, current output, etc.) as is shown in
The initial programming of the electronic system 100 may be accomplished through various well-known means such as entering a code for each specific external electronic device. “Sampling” of a signal from a remote control utilized to control a specific electronic device may also be utilized to assist in the programming of the electronic system 100. Various other methods may be utilized to program the electronic system 100 to recognize and control the external electronic devices 12 which are well known in the art.
After all of the external electronic devices 12 have been properly programmed into the electronic system 100, the user then must program the “current state” of each external electronic device into the electronic system 100. This is accomplished typically by the user answering a series of questions shown on the display regarding each display. For example, the display may ask “Is the television turned on?” which the user would respond to. It can be appreciated that there can also be a default state for all of the external devices as being “off.” All of the programmed “Current State Data” is stored within memory of the electronic system 100.
D. Current State Data
“Current State Data” is data information relating to the current state of each of the external electronic devices 12 stored within the electronic system 100. The “state” of an external electronic device 12 is comprised of various variables such as but not limited to power on, power off, volume level, mute on, mute off, audio input, audio output, video input, video output, lights on, lights off, shades open, shades closed, and various other states common to external electronic devices 12. The Current State Data is updated as actions and/or tasks are performed to provide an accurate reflection of the actual current state of the external electronic devices 12. The Current State Data is utilized by the electronic. system 100 to determine what external electronic devices 12 require modification when a “task” is selected by the user to prevent undesirable events from occurring.
E. Actions
An “action” is a specific event that occurs that typically only affects one of the external devices. An example of an action is when the user selects the power button on the keypad 114 to turn off the television which causes the television to switch from on to off or vice-versa.
The Current State Data is immediately modified to reflect the changed state of the television or other external electronic device after an action occurs as shown in
F. Tasks
A “task” may be comprised of one or more “actions” depending upon (1) the desired state of all external devices as prescribed by the task, and (2) the current state of all external devices. Examples of tasks are “watch television,” “listen to radio,” “watch video,” “listen to CD's,” “watch DVD”, and so forth. There are many more tasks that may accomplished with the present invention that are not discussed but are deemed readily apparent to one skilled in the art.
Each task has a “desired state” for each of the external electronic devices 12. When a task is selected, either through the keypad or the display, the electronic system 100 immediately determines the Current State Data and compares this data to the “Desired State Data” for all of the external electronic devices 12. After determining which external electronic devices 12 are in the desired state and which are not in the desired state, the electronic system 100 transmits a communication signal to the external electronic devices 12 that are not in the desired state to switch to the desired state based upon the task to be performed.
Another function of the present invention is to allow for the electronic system 100 to determine what menu options (i.e., “tasks”) that are available upon the display 104 based upon the current state of the external electronic devices 12. For example, if the television is currently on, the menu within the display may display the “Turn Television Off” task instead of the “Turn Television On” task which is not required.
G. Watch Television Task Example
Assuming for the sake of example that a user using the present invention has (1) interior lighting, (2) electronically controlled shades, (3) a stereo, (4) a television, (5) a CD player, and (6) a VCR which are programmed and synchronized within the electronic system as stated above.
After selecting the desired WATCH TELEVISION task, the electronic system 100 immediately reads the Current State Data and compares the same to the “Desired State Data.” Below is -a listing of the Desired State Data for the WATCH TELEVISION task.
After comparing the Current State Data to the Desired State Data, the electronic system 100 determines that the room lighting needs to be reduced by turning off lights 15 and closing shades along with switching the audio input to the television. The electronic system 100 further determines that the television needs to be turned on and the CD player turned off. Below is a listing of the individual actions that the electronic system 100 takes to perform the WATCH TELEVISION task.
After the specific actions are executed to accomplish the overall task, the memory within the electronic system 100 is automatically updated to reflect the various changes to the state of each individual external electronic device 12 for reference later. Below is a listing of the Current State Data after the WATCH TELEVISION task has been performed.
The above process is repeated for the life of the state-based remote control system 10. If additional external electronic devices are added to the overall entertainment system of the user, the user simply programs the added device 12 into the electronic system 100 and synchronizes the electronic system 100 accordingly.
As to a further discussion of the manner of usage and operation of the present invention, the same should be apparent from the above description. Accordingly, no further discussion relating to the manner of usage and operation will be provided.
With respect to the above description then, it is to be realized that the optimum dimensional relationships for the parts of the invention, to include variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use, are deemed to be within the expertise of those skilled in the art, and all equivalent structural variations and relationships to those illustrated in the drawings and described in the specification are intended to be encompassed by the present invention.
H. Configuration
The user wishes to configure the remote control to operate the user's home entertainment system. Based on the devices previously identified by the user, the Programming System provides a default configuration for the remote control that will allow the user to operate all components of the home entertainment system. Because the home entertainment system includes a television, the Programming System prompts the user to select which cable provider is being used. Because the home entertainment system includes a CD jukebox, then user is asked if he wishes to enter CD title information. With each CD selected by the user, the Programming System uses the Internet to connect to a CD database server and obtain artist, title, and track information. The Programming System then provides the user with a list of common macros which the user may be interested in adding to his configuration. The Programming System then uses the Internet to connect to TVGuide.com and download the current television schedule. The Programming System then transfers all necessary code and data to the remote control. Finally, the Programming System asks the user if he wishes to print out a booklet that describes the operation of the configured remote control.
Example: The user wishes to add the television channel “Global” to his list of preferred content. The user uses the Programming System to add the channel, and then the Programming System transfers the changed configuration to the remote control. Now, when the user browses available television channels on the remote control, the television channel “Global” is at the top of the list.
Example: The user wishes to customize the operation of the remote control. The user uses the Programming System to change the default television show reminder to be ‘Sound an alarm 1 minute before the show starts’, and changes the navigation up key to select the function ‘View cable television channel 50’.
It is noted that the Programming System may store the configuration information to allow the user to incrementally modify the configuration. For example, the user may add a new CD title to the CD jukebox. It is noted that the Programming System may be used to modify any aspect of the configuration (data and/or code) of the remote control. For example, this can even include complete functionality changes where one user develops software designed to control a home automation system, and then allows other users to use the Programming System to configure their remote control s with the new software and associated data.
It is noted that the Programming System may use any available information to assist the user in customizing the operation of the remote control, including but not limited to:
Device Network Information
User Preferences
Sample configurations provided by other users.
It is noted that the Programming System is designed to make the remote control simple to configure for a novice user. For example, if the user has specified to the Programmer 10 (see
It is noted that the remote control may be purchased pre-configured to the user's preferences, in which case configuration via the Programming System is optional.
It is noted that the remote control may be configured using the user input module 5, user output module 6 and device communication module 3, in which case the remote control is the sole component of the Programming System, and the connection to the Interface System 10 is optional. For example, the remote control can be instructed to ‘learn’ a remote control code from an infrared remote control, as is well known in the art.
It is noted that the remote control may be configured using just the Interface System 10, in which case the Interface System 10 is sole component of the Programming System.
It is noted that the Programming System may display arbitrary information to the user. For example, while the remote control is communicating with the Programming System the user may be shown advertising based on the types of television shows that the user enjoys watching.
It is noted that the user may use the remote control to alter any aspect of the configuration of the remote control. For example, the user may instruct the remote control to remember a sequence of commands and assign them to a new menu option.
It is noted that the user may interact with the Programming System when the remote control is not connected to the Programming System, in which case any changes will be transferred to the remote control at a later date.
Therefore, the foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of abandoned U.S. Patent Application No. 11/841,753, filed Aug. 20, 2007, titled “State-Based Remote Control System”, of Glen McLean Harris et al., which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. 11/411,398, filed Apr. 25, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,531,276 titled “State-Based Remote Control System” of Glen McLean Harris et al., which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. 10,870,339, filed Jun. 16, 2004 (now U.S. Patent No. 8,026,789), titled “State-Based Remote Control System,” of Glen McLean Harris et al., which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. 09/804,718, (U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805), filed Mar. 12, 2001, titled “State-Based Remote Control System,” of Glen McLean Harris et al., which claims the benefit of expired U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/253,727, filed Nov. 29, 2000, titled “State-Based Remote Control System,” of Glen McLean Harris et al. and claims the benefit of expired U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/189,487, filed Mar. 15, 2000, titled “System, Method and Apparatus for an Internet Enabled User Interaction Device”, of Glen McLean Harris et al. each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3597531 | De Marinis et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3990012 | Karnes | Nov 1976 | A |
4174517 | Mandel | Nov 1979 | A |
4231031 | Crowther et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4287676 | Weinhaus | Sep 1981 | A |
4377870 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4392022 | Carlson | Jul 1983 | A |
4394691 | Amano et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4475123 | Dumbauld et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4488179 | Kruger et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4566034 | Harger et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4567512 | Abraham | Jan 1986 | A |
4592546 | Fascenda et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4623887 | Welles, II | Nov 1986 | A |
4626848 | Ehlers | Dec 1986 | A |
4703359 | Rumbolt et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4706121 | Young | Nov 1987 | A |
4712105 | Kohler | Dec 1987 | A |
4728949 | Platte et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4746919 | Reitmeier | May 1988 | A |
4774511 | Rumbolt et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4792972 | Cook, Jr. | Dec 1988 | A |
4799141 | Drusinsky et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4807031 | Broughton et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4825200 | Evans et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825209 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4837627 | Mengel | Jun 1989 | A |
4845491 | Fascenda et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4857898 | Smith | Aug 1989 | A |
4866434 | Keenan | Sep 1989 | A |
4876592 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1989 | A |
4888709 | Revesz et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4899370 | Kameo et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4918439 | Wozniak et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4941090 | McCarthy | Jul 1990 | A |
4959719 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959810 | Darbee et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
RE33369 | Hashimoto | Oct 1990 | E |
4962466 | Revesz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4989081 | Miyagawa et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4999622 | Amano et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5001554 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5016272 | Stubbs et al. | May 1991 | A |
5033079 | Catron et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038401 | Inotsume | Aug 1991 | A |
5046093 | Wachob | Sep 1991 | A |
5065235 | Iijima | Nov 1991 | A |
5065251 | Shuhart, Jr. et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5089885 | Clark | Feb 1992 | A |
5097249 | Yamamoto | Mar 1992 | A |
5109222 | Welty | Apr 1992 | A |
5115236 | Kohler | May 1992 | A |
5117355 | McCarthy | May 1992 | A |
5128752 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1992 | A |
5132679 | Kubo et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5140326 | Bacrania et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151789 | Young | Sep 1992 | A |
5161023 | Keenan | Nov 1992 | A |
5177461 | Budzyna | Jan 1993 | A |
5202826 | McCarthy | Apr 1993 | A |
5204768 | Tsakiris et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206722 | Kwan | Apr 1993 | A |
5220420 | Hoarty et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228077 | Darbee | Jul 1993 | A |
5237327 | Saitoh et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249044 | Von Kohorn | Sep 1993 | A |
5251048 | Doane et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255313 | Darbee | Oct 1993 | A |
5272418 | Howe et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282028 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285278 | Holman | Feb 1994 | A |
5287181 | Holman | Feb 1994 | A |
5287268 | McCarthy | Feb 1994 | A |
5297204 | Levine | Mar 1994 | A |
5341166 | Garr et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355480 | Smith et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5367316 | Ikezaki | Nov 1994 | A |
5374999 | Chuang et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381991 | Stocker | Jan 1995 | A |
5382947 | Thaler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384067 | Doane et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5404393 | Remillard | Apr 1995 | A |
5406558 | Rovira et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410326 | Goldstein | Apr 1995 | A |
5410367 | Zahavi | Apr 1995 | A |
5410543 | Seitz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414426 | O'Donnell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414761 | Darbee | May 1995 | A |
5416535 | Sato et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418424 | Aprile et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422783 | Darbee et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446551 | Kawaguchi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450079 | Dunaway | Sep 1995 | A |
5455570 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461667 | Remillard | Oct 1995 | A |
5479266 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479268 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481251 | Buys et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481256 | Darbee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483276 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497185 | Dufresne et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500681 | Jones | Mar 1996 | A |
5500794 | Fujita et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502504 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504475 | Houdou et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510828 | Lutterbach et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515052 | Darbee | May 1996 | A |
5515106 | Chaney et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515270 | Weinblatt | May 1996 | A |
5517254 | Monta et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523794 | Mankovitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5523796 | Marshall et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524141 | Braun et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524195 | Clanton, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528304 | Cherrick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532689 | Bueno | Jul 1996 | A |
5532732 | Yuen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5532754 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537106 | Mitsuhashi | Jul 1996 | A |
5537107 | Funado | Jul 1996 | A |
5537463 | Escobosa et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539393 | Barfod | Jul 1996 | A |
5550576 | Klosterman | Aug 1996 | A |
5552837 | Mankovitz | Sep 1996 | A |
5552917 | Darbee et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557338 | Maze et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557721 | Fite et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559548 | Davis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566353 | Cho et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568367 | Park | Oct 1996 | A |
5576755 | Davis et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576768 | Gomikawa | Nov 1996 | A |
5579055 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579221 | Mun | Nov 1996 | A |
5583491 | Kim | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585866 | Miller et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596373 | White et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600573 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603078 | Henderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604616 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604923 | Wilkus | Feb 1997 | A |
5608446 | Carr et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614906 | Hayes et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619196 | Escobosa | Apr 1997 | A |
5619251 | Kuroiwa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625608 | Grewe et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627567 | Davidson | May 1997 | A |
5629733 | Youman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629868 | Tessier et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631652 | Lee | May 1997 | A |
5638050 | Sacca et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638113 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646608 | Shintani | Jul 1997 | A |
5650831 | Farwell | Jul 1997 | A |
5663757 | Morales | Sep 1997 | A |
5671267 | August et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677711 | Kuo | Oct 1997 | A |
5684526 | Yoshinobu | Nov 1997 | A |
5686891 | Sacca et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689353 | Darbee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691795 | Doane et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695400 | Fennell, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710601 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710605 | Nelson | Jan 1998 | A |
5721597 | Kakinurna et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734838 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5761601 | Nemirofsky et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768680 | Thomas | Jun 1998 | A |
5774172 | Kapell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778256 | Darbee | Jul 1998 | A |
5781894 | Petrecca et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786814 | Moran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794210 | Goldhaber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796832 | Kawan | Aug 1998 | A |
5800268 | Molnick | Sep 1998 | A |
5806065 | Lomet | Sep 1998 | A |
5815086 | Ivie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819034 | Joseph et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819294 | Chambers et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822123 | Davis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828318 | Cesar et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828945 | Klosterman | Oct 1998 | A |
5832296 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847798 | Yang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850249 | Massetti et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855008 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870030 | Deluca et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870683 | Wells | Feb 1999 | A |
RE36119 | Kunishima | Mar 1999 | E |
5883680 | Nykerk | Mar 1999 | A |
5886691 | Furuya et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907322 | Kelly et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909183 | Borgstahl et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923016 | Fredregill et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940073 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943228 | Kim | Aug 1999 | A |
5946646 | Schena et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949351 | Hahm | Sep 1999 | A |
5953144 | Darbee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959751 | Darbee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963145 | Escobosa | Oct 1999 | A |
5999207 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002443 | Iggulden | Dec 1999 | A |
6002450 | Darbee et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008802 | Iki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009410 | LeMole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012088 | Li et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014092 | Darbee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6040829 | Croy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057872 | Candelore | May 2000 | A |
6097309 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097441 | Allport | Aug 2000 | A |
6097520 | Kadnier | Aug 2000 | A |
6104334 | Allport | Aug 2000 | A |
6127941 | Van Ryzin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130625 | Harvey | Oct 2000 | A |
6130726 | Darbee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133847 | Yang | Oct 2000 | A |
6134512 | Barrett | Oct 2000 | A |
6144315 | Flick | Nov 2000 | A |
6144375 | Jain et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147677 | Escobosa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148241 | Ludtke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154204 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154209 | Naughton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157319 | Johns et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169451 | Kim | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173330 | Guo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195033 | Darbee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198479 | Humpleman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198481 | Urano et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208341 | van Ee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211870 | Foster | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223348 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225938 | Hayes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243035 | Walter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255961 | Van Ryzin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263346 | Rodriquez | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271831 | Escobosa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275268 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278499 | Darbee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288799 | Sekiguchi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326947 | Capps et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330091 | Escobosa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6369803 | Brisebois et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374404 | Brotz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397187 | Vriens et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407779 | Herz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408435 | Sato | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6445306 | Trovato et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469633 | Wachter | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483548 | Allport | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483906 | Iggulden et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496135 | Darbee | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496927 | McGrane et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504580 | Thompson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522262 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532592 | Shintani et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538556 | Kawajiri | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563430 | Kemink et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567011 | Young et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567984 | Allport | May 2003 | B1 |
6587067 | Darbee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597374 | Baker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628340 | Graczyk et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629077 | Arling et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637028 | Voyticky et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640144 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642852 | Dresti et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650247 | Hayes | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657679 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6690290 | Young et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690392 | Wugoski | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701091 | Escobosa et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720904 | Darbee | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6722984 | Sweeney, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724339 | Conway et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747591 | Lilleness et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748248 | Pan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748462 | Dubil et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759967 | Staller | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6781518 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781638 | Hayes | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784804 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784805 | Harris et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785579 | Huang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788241 | Arling et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6813619 | Devara | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826370 | Escobosa et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828992 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6829512 | Huang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829992 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842653 | Weishut et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847101 | Fjelstad et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859197 | Klein et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862741 | Grooters | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870463 | Dresti et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874037 | Abram | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882299 | Allport | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882729 | Arling et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885952 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6917302 | Lilleness et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933833 | Darbee | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938101 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946988 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947101 | Arling | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968570 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980150 | Conway et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7005979 | Haughawout et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009528 | Griep | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010805 | Hayes et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013434 | Masters et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
RE39059 | Foster | Apr 2006 | E |
7046161 | Hayes | May 2006 | B2 |
7079113 | Hayes et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7091898 | Arling et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093003 | Yuh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102688 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119710 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126468 | Arling et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129995 | Arling | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135985 | Woolgar et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136709 | Arling et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142127 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142934 | Janik | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142935 | Janik | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143214 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151528 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154428 | de Clercq et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154483 | Kobayashi | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155305 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161524 | Nguyen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167765 | Janik | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167913 | Chambers | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193661 | Dresti et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200357 | Janik et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209116 | Gates et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218243 | Hayes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221306 | Young | May 2007 | B2 |
7224903 | Colmenarez et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
RE39716 | Huang et al. | Jul 2007 | E |
7253765 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254777 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266701 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7266777 | Scott et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7268694 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274303 | Dresti et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281262 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283059 | Harris et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7319409 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319426 | Garfio | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7436319 | Harris et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7562128 | Caris et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7574693 | Kemink | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7612685 | Harris et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7746244 | Wouters | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7889095 | Harris et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7944370 | Harris et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8026789 | Harris et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8098140 | Escobosa et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
20010033243 | Harris et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020008789 | Harris et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020046083 | Ondeck | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056084 | Harris et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020130834 | Madarasz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151327 | Levitt | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170073 | Miller et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184626 | Darbee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190956 | Klein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194410 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030046579 | Hayes et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048295 | Lilleness et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030095156 | Klein et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103088 | Dresti et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117427 | Haughawout et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151538 | Escobosa et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164773 | Young et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030164787 | Dresti et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189509 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191650 | Turner et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193519 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233664 | Huang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046677 | Dresti et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056789 | Arling et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056984 | Hayes et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070491 | Huang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093096 | Huang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117632 | Arling et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136726 | Escobosa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040169590 | Haughawout et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040169598 | Arling et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189508 | Nguyen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189509 | Lilleness et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210933 | Dresti et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040246165 | Conway, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261134 | Perlman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263349 | Haughawout et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266419 | Arling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268391 | de Clercq et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024226 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030196 | Harris et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052423 | Harris et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055716 | Louie et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062614 | Young | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062636 | Conway et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066370 | Alvarado et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078087 | Gates et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080496 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088315 | Klein et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094610 | de Clerq et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096753 | Arling et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097594 | O'Donnell et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097618 | Arling et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107966 | Hayes | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116930 | Gates | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134578 | Chambers et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159823 | Hayes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162282 | Dresti et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179559 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183104 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195979 | Arling et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200598 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210101 | Janik | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216606 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216843 | Masters et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231649 | Arling | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050258806 | Janik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280743 | Dresti et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283814 | Scott et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050285750 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007306 | Masters et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012488 | Hilbrink et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031400 | Yuh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031437 | Chambers | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031549 | Janik et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031550 | Janik et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050142 | Scott et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055554 | Hayes et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101498 | Arling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125800 | Janik | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132458 | Garfio et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143572 | Scott et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150120 | Dresti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161865 | Scott et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060192855 | Harris et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194549 | Janik et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200538 | Yuh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259183 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259184 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259864 | Klein et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262002 | Nguyen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283697 | Garfio | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288300 | Chambers et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294217 | Chambers | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070037522 | Liu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052547 | Haughawout et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061027 | Janik | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061028 | Janik | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061029 | Janik | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063860 | Escobosa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073958 | Kalayjian | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077784 | Kalayjian et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097275 | Dresti et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136693 | Lilleness et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156739 | Black et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178830 | Janik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206949 | Mortensen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225828 | Huang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233740 | Nichols et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258595 | Choy | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271267 | Lim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279244 | Haughawout et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296552 | Huang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005764 | Arling et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016467 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016468 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036642 | Harris et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042982 | Gates et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062033 | Harris et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062034 | Harris et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068247 | Harris et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080198059 | Harris et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080302582 | Sekhri et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090224955 | Bates et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100033638 | O'Donnell et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120326852 | Harris et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6626790 | Apr 1992 | AU |
200169851 | Jan 2002 | AU |
2092003 | Nov 2008 | CA |
1399444 | Feb 2003 | CN |
1434422 | Aug 2003 | CN |
19520754 | Dec 1996 | DE |
103 438 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0103438 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0398 550 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0626635 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0972280 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1014577 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1198069 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1777830 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2738931 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2081948 | Feb 1982 | GB |
2175724 | Dec 1986 | GB |
2304217 | Mar 1997 | GB |
7-075173 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7112301 | Nov 1995 | JP |
2002058079 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002271871 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003087881 | Mar 2003 | JP |
PA2003000322 | Nov 2003 | MX |
WO 0169567 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9312612 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9319427 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9415417 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9501056 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9501057 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9501058 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9501059 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9532563 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9532583 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9628903 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9630864 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9641448 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9723960 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9733434 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9816062 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 98043158 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9844477 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9904568 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9934564 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0017738 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0028436 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0034851 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 03044684 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03045107 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03060804 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03100553 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ciarcia, S., “Build a Trainable Infrared Master Controller,” Byte, 12(3): 113-123 (1987). |
Ciarcia, S., The Best of Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar, pp. 345-354 (1987). |
Konstan, J. A., “State problems in programming human-controlled devices,” Digest of Tech. Papers of Int Conf. on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp. 122-123 (1994). |
Press Release: “Philipis Revolutionizes Home Theatre Control”; 1998, 3 pages. |
“ProntoEdit User Manual”; 2002, http://www.pronto.philips.com/index.cfm?id=241, 85 pages. |
“Pronto Review”; www.remotecentral.com/pronto/index.html, 3 pages. |
Pronto link to downloadable files for components from different manufacturers; http://www.remotecentral.com/files/index.html, 3 pages. |
Radio Shack, Universal Remote Control Owners Manual, pp. 1-19, (1987). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/519,546, filed Mar. 6, 2000, Ekkel et al. |
Cooper, Ian and Royston Shufflebotham, “PDA Web Browsers: Implementation Issues,” Computing Laboratory, The University of Kent at Canterbury, Nov. 9, 1995, pp. 1-12. |
Full House Control Corp., The RF Base Station. [online] 1997. [retrieved on Apr. 29, 1998]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.fullhouse.com/base.html>. |
Full House Control Corp., The RHOC, [online] 1997. [retrieved on Apr. 29, 1998]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.fullhouse.com/rhoc.html>. |
Full House Control Corp,, RHOC for Windows [online] 1997. [retrieved on Apr. 29, 1998]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.fullhouse.com/rhocwin.html>. |
Giannopoulos, Vassilis, “Efficient VHDL Models for Various PLD Architectures,” Thesis: Department of Engineering, College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Sep. 1995. |
Inoue, et al., “A Home Automation System,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. CE-31, No. 3, Aug. 1985, pp. 516-527. |
Kuuluvainen, et al., “The Action-State Diagram: A Compact Finite State Machine Representation for User Interfaces and Small Embedded Reactive Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 37, No, 3, Aug. 1991, pp. 651-658. |
La Porta et al., “Challenges for Nomadic Computing: Mobility Management and Wireless Communication,” Bell Laboratories, 1996, pp. 1-24. |
Lexicon, Inc., Product Brochure for Lexicon 500TProduct, 1994. |
Murata et al., “A Proposal for Standardization of Home Bus System for Home Automation,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. CE-29, No. 4, Nov. 1983, pp. 524-530. |
Niles Audio Corporation, Inc., Product Brochure for Intellicontrol Product, 1996. |
Philips Electronics N.V., “The Pronto Legend: An Overview of Our Legacy Products,” [online] No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.pronto.philips.com/Products/Archive>. |
Philips Electronics N.V., “Pronto User Guide,” No Date Given. |
Philips Electronics N.V., “Pronto Universal Intelligent Remote Control: User Guide”; No Date Given. |
Philips Electronics N.V., “ProntoEdit User Guide,” Version 1.02, Oct. 1999. |
Philips Electronics N.V., “ProntoEdit User Guide,” Version 2.0, Sep. 2000. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Award-Winning Pronto Remote Now Offers More Control for Home Entertainment Systems”; [online] Remote Central.com, 1998 [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.remotecentral.com/pronto/pedit>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Pronto TS1000 Features”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.remotecentral.com/pronto/features>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Pronto TS-1000 Remote Control Review 1”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.remotecentral.com/pronto/index>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Pronto TS-1000 Remote Control Review 2”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.remotecentral.com/pronto/index1>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Pronto TS-1000 Remote Control Review 3”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.remotecentral.com/pronto/software.htm>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Pronto TS-1000 Remote Control Review 4”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.remotecentral.com/pronto/softw1.htm>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Pronto TS-1000 Remote Control Review 5”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.remotecentral.com/pronto/second>. |
Tonks, Daniel, “Philips Pronto TS-1000 vs Marantz RC5000/RC5000i FAQ”; [online] Remote Central.com, No Date Given [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.remotecentral.com/pronto/rc5faq.htm>. |
Tritton, “Interactive Home Systems (IHS)—An Overview,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol, 34, No. 3, Aug. 1988, pp. 694-699. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Logitech Europe S.A.'s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1,” United States District Court Central District of California— Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Dec. 19. 2011. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A., “Logitech Europe S.A.'s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1 Exhibit 4: Infringment Contentions for U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Dec. 19, 2011. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Universal Electronics Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Februay 17, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. And Logitech Europe S. A., “Universal Electronics Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions Exhibit A: Invalidity of U.S, Patent No. 5,410,326,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Feb. 17, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Patent Local Rule 4-3,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Apr. 23, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Exhibit B (Logitech Patents): Disputed Terms, Proposed Constructions and Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Apr. 23, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Exhibit A-H: Logitech Means-Plus-Function Chart for U,S. Patent Nos. 5,255,313, 5,228,077, 5,414,761,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Apr. 27, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Supplemental/Amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Patent Local Rule 4-3,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Supplemental/Amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Patent Local Rule 4-3 Exhibit B (Logitech Patents): Disputed Terms, Proposed Constructions, and Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California —Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit C: Independent Asserted Claims in which the Parties Dispute One or More Claim Terms,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit D: Claim Chart of UEI's Proposed Constructions & Logitech's Proposed Constructions,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S,A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. In Support of Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S,A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 8: U.S. Patent No. 6784,805,” United States District Court Central District of California— Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. In Support of Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 17a: The Prosectution History of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805 (Part 2),” United States District Court Central District of California —Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S,A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 17b: The Prosectution History of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805 (Part 1),” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S,A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 19: Various Dictionary Entries Contained in Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of Robert J. Artuz in Support of Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California —Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of Robert J. Artuz in Support of Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 7: U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of Robert J. Artuz in Support of Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 25: Application Excerpts (Mar. 1, 2001, pp. 17-19) from the Prosectution Histoty of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of Robert J. Artuz in Support of Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 26: Office action Excerpts (Sep. 25, 2003, pp. 4-6) from the Prosectution History of U.S. Patent No, 6,784,805,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of Robert J. Artuz in Support of Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief Exhibit 27: Applicant's Response Excerpts (Dec. 4, 2003, pp. 9, 11-15, 17-18) from the Prosectution History of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,805,” United States District Court Central District of California— Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), May 11, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Logitech, Inc., Logitech International S.A., and Logitech Europe S.A.'s Response to Universal Electronics Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Jun. 15, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Universal Electronics Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Jun. 15, 2012. |
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Logitech Inc., Logitech International S.A. and Logitech Europe S. A., “Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Universal Electronics Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief,” United States District Court Central District of California—Southern Division, Case No. SACV11-1056-JVS(Anx), Jun. 15, 2012. |
Voelker et al., “Mobisaic: An Information System for a Mobile Wireless Computing Environment,” WMCSA '94 Proceedings of the 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1994. |
Yannakakis et al., “Testina Finite State Machines,” ACM 089791-397-3/91/0004/0475, 1991, pp. 476-485. |
Zeisel, et al., “An Interactive Menu-Driven Remote Control Unit for TV—Receivers and VC-Recorders,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 34, No. 3, Aug. 1988, pp. 814-818. |
International Search Report for PCT/CA01/00323 mailed on Apr. 4, 2002; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110133976 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60253727 | Nov 2000 | US | |
60189487 | Mar 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11841753 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13027153 | US | |
Parent | 11411398 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 11841753 | US | |
Parent | 10870339 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11411398 | US | |
Parent | 09804718 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10870339 | US |