State-monitoring memory element

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8462576
  • Patent Number
    8,462,576
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 22, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 11, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Embodiments of the invention relate to a state-monitoring memory element. The state-monitoring memory element may be implemented by degrading an input voltage supply to the state-monitoring memory element across a diode and/or a transistor. One or more current sources may be used to stress the state-monitoring memory element. A logic analyzer may be used to analyze the integrity of the state-monitoring memory element and trigger appropriate actions in the IC, e.g., reset, halt, remove power, interrupt, responsive to detecting a failure in the state-monitoring memory element. Multiple state-monitoring memory elements may be disturbed in different locations on the IC for better coverage.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to Integrated Circuits (ICs), and more particularly to a state-monitoring memory element to detect potential failures in ICs.


BACKGROUND

In many IC applications, some means for monitoring a voltage state of certain elements on the IC are needed. For example, when an input voltage supply to one or more elements on the IC falls below a certain voltage threshold, a “reset” signal might be generated to reset the IC in order to avoid damage to the IC.


A voltage detector circuit implementing a low voltage detection function may be used to monitor the voltage state of the elements on the IC. The voltage detector circuit may include a voltage divider coupled to a field effect transistor (FET). A scaled input voltage taken across the voltage divider may be supplied to the gate input of the FET. If an input voltage supply is high, the FET will be turned on, in which case the voltage detector circuit does not issue a reset signal. On the other hand, if the input voltage supply drops below a certain voltage threshold, the FET will be turned off, and the voltage detector circuit generates a reset signal to reset the IC. The above-described voltage detector circuit incurs high power consumption since the resistive voltage divider constantly drains current from the input voltage supply. In addition, since the voltage detector circuit requires a certain voltage threshold to turn on the FET, the voltage threshold required to trigger the reset signal may not be low enough. As a result, unnecessary reset signal may occur at the output of the voltage detector circuit.


DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS
Overview

A system comprises at least one state-monitoring memory element having a reduced ability to retain a logic state compared to a normal memory element; and a logic analyzer to detect a failure in the state-monitoring memory element and to generate an indicator of failure responsive to the detection. The system may comprise a voltage supply circuit to degrade an input voltage and to provide the degraded input voltage to the state-monitoring memory element, wherein the voltage supply circuit comprises one of a diode or a transistor. Alternatively, the system may comprise at least one current source to stress the state-monitoring memory element.


A method includes configuring the state-monitoring memory element to have a reduced ability to retain a logic state compared to a normal memory element; detecting a failure in the state-monitoring memory element; and generating an indicator of failure responsive to detecting the failure in the state-monitoring memory element. The method includes degrading an input voltage across one of a diode or a transistor. At least one current source may be coupled to the state-monitoring memory element to stress the state-monitoring memory element. The method further includes presetting the state-monitoring memory element to a logic state and detecting if the state-monitoring memory element loses the preset logic state after a power transient.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, advantages and features will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an example IC 100 having state monitoring memory elements according to embodiments of the invention.



FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C illustrate further details of the state-monitoring memory element 30 of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an example circuit 300 for configuring the state-monitoring memory element 30 of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an array of the state-monitoring memory element 30 of FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an example integrated circuit (IC) 100 having state-monitoring memory elements according to embodiments of the invention. It should be recognized that FIG. 1 may include other elements, which are not illustrated in order to simplify the figures and which may not be necessary to understand the example system disclosed below.


Referring to FIG. 1, the IC 100 may include one or more regular memory elements, such as 20a-20g. Each regular memory element 20a-20g may be a register, a memory cell, a latch, an array of registers or memory cells, and/or the like. The IC 100 may additionally include one or more state-monitoring memory elements, such as 30a-30c. Each state-monitoring memory element 30a-30c may be configured to have a reduced ability to retain a logic state than the regular memory elements 20a-20g in the IC 100. For example, a regular memory element, such as 20a-20g, may fail to operate or lose its logic state when an input voltage supply to the regular memory element drops to approximately 1.0 volt, whereas a state-monitoring memory element, such as 30a-30c, may fail at an input voltage supply of approximately 1.2 volts. In others words, a state-monitoring memory element 30a-30c may be more sensitive to a voltage drop than a regular memory element 20a-20g such that the state-monitoring memory element 30a-30c fails earlier than a regular memory element 20a-20g as the input voltage supply degrades over time. In some embodiments, if any one of the state-monitoring memory elements 30a-30c fails or loses state, it may be a good indicator that the IC 100's state retention may be in jeopardy, possibly requiring the IC 100 to be reset. FIG. 3 describes how the state-monitoring memory element 30 may be configured to have a reduced ability to retain a memory state than other regular memory element 20 in the IC 200, such that the state-monitoring memory element 30 fails before the regular memory element 20 in the IC 100.


Although FIG. 1 shows only three state-monitoring memory elements 30a-30c, the IC 100 may include any number of state-monitoring memory elements. Each of the state-monitoring memory elements 30a-30c may be implemented as a register, a memory cell, a latch, an array of registers or memory cells, and/or the like. In some embodiments, the state-monitoring memory elements 30a-30c may be distributed in different locations of the IC 100 for better coverage.



FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C illustrate the effects of a voltage drop on a state-monitoring memory element 30 and a regular memory element 20 of FIG. 1. FIG. 2A shows a voltage curve, in which the input voltage declines linearly as a function of time. In FIG. 2A, the input voltage value V1 is less than the input voltage value V2, which is in turn less than the input voltage value V3. The voltages curve of FIG. 2A represents an input voltage supply to the regular memory element 20 and the state-monitoring memory element 30. The voltage curve of FIG. 2 may also decline as another function of time.



FIGS. 2B and 2C respectively shows the effect of a voltage drop on the regular memory element 20 and the state-monitoring element 30. In FIG. 2B, the regular memory element 20 may continue to operate or keep its memory state, e.g., regions 1 and 2, as long as the input voltage is above the input voltage value V1. When the input voltage falls below the input voltage value V1 at time T2, the regular memory element 20 may fail or lose its memory state, e.g., region 3. On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 2C, the state-monitoring memory element 30 may fail to operate or lose its memory state when the input voltage falls below the input voltage value V2 at time T1. In others words, the state-monitoring memory element 30 may be more sensitive to a voltage drop than the regular memory element 20 such that the state-monitoring memory element 30 fails earlier than a regular memory element 20 as the input voltage degrades over time. Thus when the state-monitoring memory element 30 fails, it may be a good indicator that the IC 100's state retention may be in jeopardy, possibly resulting in a reset of the IC 100.



FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an example circuit 300 for configuring the state-monitoring memory element 30 of FIG. 1. Referring to FIG. 3, the circuit 300 may include a voltage supply circuit 60 for supplying voltages to the state-monitoring memory element 30. The voltage supply circuit 60 receives a voltage VDD derived from a voltage source (not shown), such as a battery. The voltage VDD may be degraded to some voltage level, e.g., degraded VDD 65, which may be supplied to the positive power supply of the state-monitoring memory element 30. The state-monitoring memory element 30 may be implemented as a register, a memory cell, a latch, an array of registers or memory cells, and/or the like.


As shown in FIG. 3, the voltage VDD may be degraded by coupling a diode 50 to the positive power supply of the state-monitoring memory element 30. When the voltage VDD exceeds a threshold value of the diode 50, the diode 50 would be turned on to effectuate a voltage drop, resulting in the degraded VDD 65. Alternatively, the voltage VDD may be degraded by coupling a transistor device, e.g., a p-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (PMOS) 90, to the state-monitoring memory element 30. The amount of voltage drop may depend on a threshold voltage of the transistor device and a gate bias voltage of the transistor device. For example, when the voltage VDD exceeds a certain value, the PMOS 90 would be turned on to effectuate a voltage drop, resulting in the degraded VDD 65. Although FIG. 3 shows that a PMOS 90 is used to degrade the voltage VDD, an n-channel MOSFET (NMOS) may be used to degrade the voltage VDD.


Similarly, a diode (not shown) and/or a transistor device (e.g., NMOS transistor 92) may be coupled to the negative power supply of the state-monitoring memory element 30 to degrade the voltage supply to the state-monitoring memory element 30 using the same principle described above. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the NMOS transistor 92 may be coupled to the negative power supply of the state-monitoring memory element 30 such that when the gate bias voltage of the NMOS 92 exceeds its threshold voltage, the NMOS 92 may be turned on to effectuate a voltage drop, e.g., degraded ground 66.


One or more current sources, such as 80a, 80b, may be coupled to the state-monitoring memory element 30 to stress the state-monitoring memory element 30 due to the load current that flows through the state-monitoring memory element 30. These current sources may degrade the voltage at output 32 below the degraded VDD 65, and thus compromising the state-retention ability of the state-monitoring memory element 30. It should be noted that the current in the current sources 80a and 80b may be small, e.g. on the order of 10 nA.


The state-monitoring memory element 30 may be initialized by writing it with a logic state, e.g., “1”. After degrading the voltage supply of the state-monitoring memory element 30 to a certain voltage value, the state-monitoring memory element 30 may fail or lose its memory state, in which case the state-monitoring memory element 30 may output a “0 to the logic analyzer 40 (assuming that the state-monitoring memory element has been initialized with a logic state of “1”). It should be noted that the state-monitoring memory element 30 may be initialized to a logic state other than logic state “1”, e.g., logic state “0”, such that failures may be detected on either logic state “1” or “0”. The logic analyzer 40 analyzes the output 32 of the state-monitoring memory element 30 to determine whether the state-monitoring memory element 30 has failed or lost its memory state. If the logic analyzer 40 detects a failure in the state-monitoring memory element 30, the logic analyzer 40 may issue a signal 33 to trigger appropriate actions in the IC 100, such as resetting the IC 100, halting the IC 100, removing power, or generating an interrupt.


The above describes various means that may be used to degrade the state-retention ability of the state-monitoring element 30, such as by coupling a diode, a transistor device, current sources, or a combination thereof, to the state-monitoring memory element 30. The voltage threshold required to trigger a reset signal may be controlled to reduce the occurrence of unnecessary resets in the IC 100. In addition, the circuit 300 consumes less power than the resistive voltage divider mentioned earlier.



FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an array of the state-monitoring memory element 30 of FIG. 1. Referring to FIG. 4, the IC 100 may include an array 400 of state-monitoring memory elements, such as state-monitoring memory element 1, state-monitoring memory element 2, . . . , and state-monitoring memory element n, where n>=3. The IC 100 may also include a voltage supply circuit 60 to generate various input voltages, such as V1, V2, . . . , and Vu, where n>=3, each representing a same or different voltage level. Each of these input voltages V1, V2, . . . , Vn may be supplied to a respective state-monitoring memory element. Additionally, each of the respective state-monitoring memory elements may be coupled to one or more current sources 80. The current sources 80 may stress the state-monitoring memory element as a result of the load current that flows through the state-monitoring memory element. Consequently, the current sources 80 may cause the respective state-monitoring memory element to be more vulnerable to voltage degradation and thus more likely to fail when the input voltages V1, V2, . . . , Vn degrade to a certain voltage value. State-monitoring memory element 1, state-monitoring memory element 2, . . . , and state-monitoring memory element n may each be implemented as a register, a memory cell, a latch, an array of registers or memory cells, and/or the like.


A logic analyzer 40 is used in the IC 100 to analyze the integrity of the respective state-monitoring memory elements. In some embodiments, state-monitoring memory element 1, state-monitoring memory element 2, . . . , and state-monitoring memory element n, may each be initialized by writing to it a logic state, e.g., 1. After degrading the input voltages V1, V2, . . . , Vn for the respective state-monitoring memory element to a certain voltage value, one or more of these state-monitoring memory elements may fail or lose its memory state. For example, if the initial logic state in the respective state-monitoring memory elements is “1”, the state-monitoring element may lose the original logic state due to a voltage drop in the respective input voltages, in which case the logic state in the state-monitoring memory element may be “0”. It should be noted that these state-monitoring memory elements may each be initialized to a logic state other than logic state “1”, e.g., logic state “0”, such that failures may be detected on either logic state “1” or “0”. The logic analyzer 40 analyzes the output of the respective state-monitoring memory elements to determine whether one or more of the state-monitoring memory elements have lost the memory state. If the logic analyzer 40 detects that any one of these state-monitoring memory elements fails or loses its memory state, the logic analyzer 40 may issue a signal 42 to trigger appropriate actions in the IC 100, such as resetting the IC, halting the IC, removing power, or generating an interrupt. For example, a reset signal may be sent to a central processor unit (not shown) to possibly reset the IC 100. The array of state-monitoring memory elements may be distributed in different locations in the IC 100 for better coverage.


Embodiments of the invention relate to a state-monitoring memory element for detecting potential IC failures. Embodiments of the invention allow for an accurate detection of potential IC failures, while consuming less power. The state-monitoring memory element may have a reduced ability to retain a logic state than other regular memory elements on an IC. Thus, if the state-monitoring memory elements fails or loses state during testing, it may be a good indicator that the IC's state retention may be in jeopardy, possibly requiring the IC to be reset. The state-monitoring memory element may be implemented as a register, a memory cell, a latch, or an array of registers or memory cells. The state-monitoring memory element may be degraded by dropping an input voltage supply across a diode, a transistor, or a combination of both. At least one current source may be used to stress the state-monitoring memory element. A logic detector may be used to analyze the integrity of the state-monitoring memory element. The logic analyzer may trigger appropriate actions in the IC responsive to detecting a failure of the state-monitoring memory element. Multiple state-monitoring memory elements may be distributed in different locations on the IC for better coverage.


Further modifications and alternative embodiments of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the manner of carrying out the invention. Various changes may be made in the shape, size and arrangement and types of components or devices. For example, equivalent elements or materials may be substituted for those illustrated and described herein, and certain features of the invention may be utilized independently of the use of other features, all as would be apparent to one skilled in the art after having the benefit of this description of the invention. Alternative embodiments are contemplated and are within the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system, comprising: a first circuit comprising memory elements of a memory array that are powered at an input supply voltage, wherein the input supply voltage changes over time; anda second circuit coupled to a state-monitoring memory element of the memory array, the state-monitoring memory element being representative of a voltage sensitivity of other memory elements of the memory array, wherein the second circuit is configured to determine when the input supply voltage drops below a threshold voltage at which the state-monitory memory element operates, and wherein the second circuit comprises a circuit to provide a degraded ground to the state-monitoring memory element.
  • 2. A system, comprising; a first circuit comprising memory elements of a memory array that are powered at an input supply voltage, wherein the input supply voltage changes over time; anda second circuit coupled to a state-monitoring memory element of the memory array, the state-monitoring memory element being representative of a voltage sensitivity of other memory elements of memory array, the second circuit is configured to determine when the input supply voltage drops below a threshold voltage at which the state-monitory memory element operates, and wherein the second circuit comprises at least one current source coupled to the state-monitoring memory element.
  • 3. A system, comprising: a first circuit comprising memory elements of a memory array that are powered at an input supply voltage, wherein the input supply voltage changes over time; anda second circuit coupled to a state-monitoring memory element of the memory array, the state-monitoring memory element being representative of a voltage sensitivity of other memory elements of the memory array, wherein the second circuit is configured to determine when the input supply voltage drops below a threshold voltage at which the state-monitory memory element operates, wherein the second circuit is configured to detect when the input supply voltage drops below the threshold voltage and to issue a reset signal responsive to the input supply voltage drop.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the second circuit comprises a voltage supply circuit configured to provide a degraded input supply voltage to the state-monitoring memory element and to provide the input supply voltage to the other memory elements of the memory array, wherein the degraded input supply voltage is less than the input supply voltage.
  • 5. The system of claim 3, wherein the state-monitoring memory element is substantially identical to one or more of the other memory elements of the memory array.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the state-monitoring memory element comprises a reduced ability to retain a logic state compared to one of the other memory elements, and wherein the state-monitoring memory element is configured to lose the logic state before the one memory element when the degraded input supply voltage drops below the threshold voltage.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the second circuit further comprises a voltage supply circuit configured to supply the degraded input supply voltage to the state-monitoring memory element to have the reduced ability.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the second circuit further comprises a failure detection element configured to detect a failure by the state-monitoring memory element to retain the logic state and responsive to the detection to generate an indicator of the failure, and wherein the failure detection element is further configured to issue an interrupt signal to a system processor.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the voltage supply circuit comprises one of a diode, a transistor, or a combination thereof.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the second circuit further comprises a logic analyzer, wherein the logic analyzer is configured to generate an indicator of failure if the state-monitoring memory element fails to maintain the initial logic state when the input voltage drops below the threshold voltage.
  • 11. The system of claim 3, wherein the state-monitoring memory element is one of a register, a memory cell, a latch, an array of registers, or an array of memory cells.
  • 12. The system of claim 3, wherein the first circuit and the second circuit reside on a common integrated circuit.
  • 13. A system, comprising: a first circuit comprising memory elements of a memory array that are powered at an input supply voltage, wherein the input supply voltage changes over time; anda second circuit coupled to a state-monitoring memory element of the memory array, the state-monitoring memory element being representative of a voltage sensitivity of other memory elements of the memory array, wherein the second circuit is configured to determine when the input supply voltage drops below a threshold voltage at which the state-monitory memory element operates, wherein the second circuit further comprises a logic analyzer, wherein the logic analyzer is configured to generate an indicator of failure if the state-monitoring memory element fails to maintain the initial logic state when the input voltage drops below the threshold voltage, and wherein the logic analyzer is adapted to issue a reset signal responsive to detecting a failure in the state-monitoring memory element.
  • 14. A method, comprising: powering a first circuit comprising a memory array of memory elements at an input supply voltage, wherein the input supply voltage changes over time; anddetermining, using a second circuit comprising a state-monitoring memory element of the memory array, if the input supply voltage drops below a threshold voltage at which the state-monitoring memory element operates, the state-monitoring memory element being representative of a voltage sensitivity of other memory elements of the memory array and the threshold voltage, and wherein the determining comprises providing a degraded ground to the state-monitoring memory element.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein said determining comprises providing a degraded input supply voltage to the state-monitoring memory element and to provide the input supply voltage to the other memory elements of the memory array, wherein the degraded input supply voltage is less than the input supply voltage.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the state-monitoring memory element comprises a reduced ability to retain a logic state compared to one of the other memory elements, and wherein the state-monitoring memory element is configured to lose the logic state before the one memory element when the degraded input supply voltage drops below the threshold voltage.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein said determining comprises: detecting a failure by the state-monitoring memory element to retain the logic state;responsive to the detection, generating an indicator of the failure and issuing an interrupt signal to a system processor.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/857,947 filed Sep. 19, 2007, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/912,399, filed Apr. 17, 2007, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (76)
Number Name Date Kind
4454589 Miller Jun 1984 A
4843592 Tsuaki et al. Jun 1989 A
4879505 Barrow et al. Nov 1989 A
4951171 Tran et al. Aug 1990 A
5079744 Tobita et al. Jan 1992 A
5341267 Whitten et al. Aug 1994 A
5386575 Shinkai et al. Jan 1995 A
5500823 Martin et al. Mar 1996 A
5530673 Tobita et al. Jun 1996 A
5708589 Beauvais Jan 1998 A
5717256 Okumura et al. Feb 1998 A
5760612 Ramirez Jun 1998 A
5956279 Mo et al. Sep 1999 A
6018559 Azegami et al. Jan 2000 A
6091227 Beard Jul 2000 A
6101617 Burckhartt et al. Aug 2000 A
6121791 Abbott Sep 2000 A
6130553 Nakaya Oct 2000 A
6215326 Jefferson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215352 Sudo Apr 2001 B1
6256754 Roohparvar Jul 2001 B1
6260087 Chang Jul 2001 B1
6348798 Daw Feb 2002 B1
6404224 Azegami et al. Jun 2002 B1
6426677 Prentice Jul 2002 B1
6449628 Wasson Sep 2002 B1
6476634 Bilski Nov 2002 B1
6614320 Sullam et al. Sep 2003 B1
6754101 Terzioglu et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757761 Smith et al. Jun 2004 B1
6853598 Chevallier Feb 2005 B2
6864710 Lacey et al. Mar 2005 B1
6885952 Hayes Apr 2005 B1
6891355 Kernahan May 2005 B2
6901014 Son et al. May 2005 B2
6960936 Cambonie Nov 2005 B2
7043710 Reese et al. May 2006 B2
7052179 Tesi May 2006 B2
7107302 Fridman et al. Sep 2006 B1
7123033 Wright Oct 2006 B1
7193901 Ruby et al. Mar 2007 B2
7243118 Lou Jul 2007 B2
7274212 Burney et al. Sep 2007 B1
7283410 Hsu et al. Oct 2007 B2
7389487 Chan et al. Jun 2008 B1
7472155 Simkins et al. Dec 2008 B2
7616509 Qureshi et al. Nov 2009 B2
7637658 Gardner et al. Dec 2009 B2
7648271 Doorenbos et al. Jan 2010 B2
7737724 Snyder et al. Jun 2010 B2
7880459 Harvey Feb 2011 B2
7882165 Simkins et al. Feb 2011 B2
7908306 Chieng et al. Mar 2011 B1
8024678 Taylor et al. Sep 2011 B1
8026739 Sullam et al. Sep 2011 B2
8111577 Sheets et al. Feb 2012 B2
20010000634 Keehn et al. May 2001 A1
20010006347 Jefferson et al. Jul 2001 A1
20030055852 Wojko Mar 2003 A1
20040000928 Cheng et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040017222 Betz et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040034843 Osann Feb 2004 A1
20050027776 Lou Feb 2005 A1
20050091472 Master et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050134308 Okada et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050283509 Hennedy et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060195498 Dobbek et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070091698 Watanabe et al. Apr 2007 A1
20080042687 Mori et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049507 Lee Feb 2008 A1
20080094102 Osann Apr 2008 A1
20080258804 Kutz Oct 2008 A1
20080263319 Snyder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263334 Synder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288755 Synder et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294806 Swindle et al. Nov 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
802631 Oct 1997 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (112)
Entry
Calhoun et al. “Standby Power Reduction Using Dynamic Voltage Scaling and Canary Flip-Flop Structures,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 2004 pp. 1504-1511.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,291 dated Sep. 21, 2009; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,291 dated Oct. 5, 2009; 2 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,291 dated Jan. 13, 2010; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965.291 dated May 5, 2009; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated May 12, 2011; 5 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated May 19, 2010; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated Sep. 15, 2010; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated Nov. 2, 2009; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated Feb. 12, 2010; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated Sep. 10, 2009; 6 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,128 dated Oct. 19, 2009; 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Jan. 11, 2010; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Feb. 14, 2011; 9 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Apr. 19, 2010; 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Ailowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Jun. 2, 2011; 9 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Jul. 22, 2010; 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Oct. 28, 2010; 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,391: “Clock Driven Dynamic Datapath Chaining,” Warren Synder et al., filed Apr. 16, 2008; 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/238,893: “Method and System of Digital Signal Processing,” Monte Mar, filed Sep. 26, 2008; 26 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,450: “Digital Signal Processor Control Architecture,” Monte Mar, filed Sep. 26, 2008; 28 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,334: “Univerasal digital Block Interconnection and Channel Routing,” Warren Snyder et al., filed May 2, 2011, 31 pages.
Calhoun et al., “Standby Power Reduction Using Dynamic Voltage Scaling and Canary Flip-Flop Structures,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 1504-1511.
Enomoto et al., “A Self-Controllable Voltage Level (SVL) Circuit and Its Low-Power High-Speed CMOS Circuit Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 1220-1226.
International Search Report of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/60698 dated Sep. 5, 2008; 2 pages.
Internationai Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/60698 dated Sep. 5, 2008; 2 pages.
Tektronix, Tektronix Logic Analyzers TLA7000 Series Data Sheet, Jun. 23, 2009.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Aug. 27, 2010; 3 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,678 dated Feb. 16, 2011; 5 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,450 dated Aug. 14, 2012.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/945,709 dated Feb. 9, 2006; 14 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Jan. 4, 2011; 14 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Oct. 14, 2009; 22 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,672 dated Dec. 30, 2009: 6 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated May 6, 2011; 7 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Jun. 22, 2010; 11 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Sep. 4, 2012; 26 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,678 dated Dec. 3, 2010; 9 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,334 dated Oct. 17, 2012; 5 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/945,709 dated Sep. 7, 2005; 14 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Feb. 3, 2010; 23 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Mar. 30, 2009; 18 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Jul. 21, 2010; 15 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,547 dated Oct. 1, 2009; 9 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,672 dated Jul. 17, 2009; 6 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Feb. 4, 2010; 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Dec. 3, 2010; 18 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,291 dated Dec. 17, 2008; 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated Mar. 10, 2009; 10 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,240 dated Jun. 10, 2009; 7 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,243 dated Sep. 17, 2009; 9 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 dated Mar. 4, 2010; 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,128 dated Apr. 29, 2009; 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Apr. 6, 2011, 23 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Mar. 30, 2010; 22 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,672 dated Aug. 26, 2009; 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,678 dated Jul. 2, 2010; 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,412 dated Jan. 31, 2011; 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/945,709 dated Jun. 20, 2006; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Mar. 30, 2011; 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Jul. 8, 2011; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/857,947 dated Dec. 23, 2011; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,672 Apr. 20, 2011; 2 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,672 dated Mar. 2, 2011, 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,291 dated Apr. 15, 2010; 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 “Universal Digital Block With Integrated Arithmetic Logic Unit,” Warren Snyder et al., Filed on Dec. 21, 2007; 30 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,291 “Universal Digital Block Interconnection and Channel Routing,” Snyder et al., filed on Dec. 27, 2007: 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 “System Level Interconnect With Programmable Switching,” Bert Sullam et al., Filed on Dec. 27, 2007; 47 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 “Dynamically Configurable and Re-Configurable Data Path,” Warren Synder at al., Filed on Dec. 31, 2007; 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 “Programmable System-On-Chip Hub,” Scott Allen Swindle at al., Filed on Mar. 31, 2008; 39 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,391 “Clock Driven Dynamic Datap Chaining,” Warren Synder at el., Filed on Apr. 16, 2008; 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,412 “Universal Digital Block Interconnection and Channel Routing,” Warren Snyder at al., Filed on May 24, 2010; 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,334 “Universal Digital Block Interconnection and Channel Routing,” Warren Snyder et al., Filed on May 2, 2011; 32 pages.
Application No. PCT/US08/60673 “Clock Driven Dynamic Datapath Chaining,”Filed on Apr. 17, 2008; 24 pages.
Application No. PCT/US08/60680 “Universal Digital Block Interconnection and Channel Routing,” Filed on Apr. 17, 2008; 25 pages.
Application No. PCT/US08/60685 “Universal Digital Block With Integrated Arithmetic Logic Unit,” Filed on Apr. 17, 2008; 24 pages.
Application No. PCT/US08/60695 “System Level Interconnect With Programmable Switching,” Filed on Apr. 17, 2008; 41pages.
Application No. PCT/US08/60696 “Dynamically Configurable and Re-Configurable Data Path,” Filed on Apr. 17, 2008; 29 pages.
International Search Report for International Apptication No. PCT/US08/60680 dated Aug. 15, 2008; 2 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US08/60665 dated Sep. 17, 2008; 5 pages.
International Search Report for Internationat Application No. PCT/US08/60.695 dated Jul. 22, 2009; 3 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US08/60696 dated Sep. 22, 2008; 5 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US08/60698 dated Sep. 5, 2008; 5 pages.
International Written Opinion for International Apptication No. PCT/US08/60685 dated Sep. 17, 2008; 4 pages.
SIPO 4 month Office Action for Application No. 200880012232.1 dated May 6, 2011; 2 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Jun. 30, 2011; 3 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 dated Oct. 6, 2011; 3 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Sep. 7, 2012; 3 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 dated Aug. 2, 2010; 6 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 dated Jul. 29, 2011; 5 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Jan. 24, 2012; 25 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Oct. 12, 2010; 22 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Nov. 8, 2011; 24 page.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated May 15, 2012; 19 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,661 dated Dec. 29, 2011; 16 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 dated Jan. 5, 2011; 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,145 dated Apr. 4, 2010; 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Mar. 30, 2010, 22 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated May 1, 2012; 25 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,176 dated Nov. 20, 2012; 26 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,391 dated Oct. 20, 2011; 4 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,412 dated Jan. 31, 2011; 1 page.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,334 dated May 25, 2012; 12 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,677 dated Jan. 6, 2011; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,391 dated Dec. 1, 2011; 5 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,391 dated Dec. 7, 2012; 5 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,334 dated Nov. 23, 2012; 7 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/197,624 dated Nov. 30, 2012, 7 pages.
Written Opinion of the international Search Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/60680 dated Aug. 15, 2008; 4 pages.
Written Opinion of the international Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/60695 mailed Jul. 22, 2009; 6 pages.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Internationai Application No. PCT/US08/60696 mailed Sep. 22, 2008; 4 pages.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/60698 mailed Sep. 5, 2008: 4 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120176854 A1 Jul 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60912399 Apr 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11857947 Sep 2007 US
Child 13303112 US