Stateless services do not maintain any state on the server. One request is totally independent of the other one. In the case of content management, clients typically operate on objects after getting a session to a repository. The sessions have caches associated with them which store up to date information about the objects. In the stateless case, typically one request gets a session, operates on an object, and releases the session. The next request that wants to operate on the same object typically must retrieve the object again, if as is typical the cache in which the object was stored previously was removed when the session associated with the previous request involving the object was released.
Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computer program product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or a processor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions stored on and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task may be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’ refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing cores configured to process data, such as computer program instructions.
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
In distributed systems, such as enterprise content management (ECM) systems, documents and other content items may be stored in a remote repository or other content store and accessed via a content server or other access node. Application or other servers and/or client system use sessions connected to the repository to access content. Such sessions typically are managed by session manager entities. Each session manager typically has a session pool associated with it which is called the “Level-1” pool. The sessions that are managed by these session manager entities have object caches, which prevent expensive object fetches from the backend. As long as the sessions are active, which indirectly means “Level-1” pools are active, the expensive fetch operations are avoided. In stateless scenarios, these session manager objects are destroyed after every request and recreated for each new request. Typically, when a session manager is destroyed, the “Level-1” pool is also destroyed, as a cascading effect the sessions and their object caches are also destroyed. This forces the new sessions to perform the expensive object fetches from the backend.
A global session pool, which each of a plurality of session managers use and share, is disclosed. In various embodiments, instead of each session manager having a “Level-1” or other session pool of its own, all of the session manager objects share the global session pool. Sessions released by a session manager go the global pool and are available for other session managers to be picked up. Stateless services which create a new session manager for every request would still have the sessions released by an earlier session manager, and any associated object caches and/or previously retrieved object stored therein, available.
In various embodiments, care is taken to ensure that only the session with the correct credentials are picked up, i.e., a particular session manager is provided only with a session that is appropriate for the request the session manager is working to fulfill, given the credential(s) of the associated user.
In various embodiments, using a global session pool and session managers configured to use the global pool results in sessions that are picked up from the global pool having their object caches remain intact, even after the session manager is no longer extant, with the result that expensive backend fetches of data that may already be in the object cache, if any, is avoided.
The application server 114 is configured in various embodiments to run one or more applications in an application framework (e.g., runtime environment) comprising or otherwise associated with a content management system of which content server 110 and repository 112 are elements. For example, applications running on application server 114 in various embodiments may enable users of client systems such as 102, 104, and 106 to create and/or modify content items, and to save them to and/or access them from repository 112 via content server 110. In various embodiments, application server 114 interacts with content server 110 at least in part programmatically to save content items to and/or access content items from repository 112 via content server 110. In various embodiments, application server may establish with content server 110 one or more communications sessions, e.g., for purposes of storing or accessing content items in repository 112. In some embodiments, a stateless communication protocol is used, and a different session is used for each request from application server 114 to content server 110. In some embodiments, the session used to service a request is configured and/or selected to be one that is appropriate for a given request based at least in part on one or more attributes of the request (e.g., user credentials of a user with which the request is associated) and/or one or more attributes of the session (e.g., how long ago the session was last used, etc.).
In the example shown in
Using techniques disclosed herein results in various embodiments in sessions that are picked up from the global pool having their object caches remain intact, even after the session manager is no longer extant, with the result that expensive backend fetches of data that may already be in the object cache, if any, is avoided.
Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of the filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/734,318 entitled “STATELESS SERVICES IN CONTENT MANAGEMENT CLIENTS” filed on Jun. 9, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/630,834, entitled “STATELESS SERVICES IN CONTENT MANAGEMENT CLIENTS,” filed Sep. 28, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,083,579, the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6018619 | Allard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
7043752 | Royer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127608 | Royer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127609 | Royer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
8132247 | Adhya | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8213393 | Suganthi | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8428931 | Yaffe | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8451806 | Kumar | May 2013 | B2 |
8589575 | Ramachandra | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8640086 | Bonev et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9009327 | Adhya et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9083579 | Kaushik | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9686208 | Kaushik | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20060294187 | Hakel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080043761 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20120023554 | Murgia et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036244 | Ramachandra | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120177195 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120290732 | Suganthi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150271099 | Kaushik et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,834, dated Dec. 4, 2014, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,318, dated Sep. 15, 2016, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170250924 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14734318 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15596726 | US | |
Parent | 13630834 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14734318 | US |