This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/257,830, now abandoned, which is a U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/EP01/04516, filed Apr. 20, 2001, which claims foreign priority to German Patent Application 100 19 759.0-23, filed Apr. 20, 2000, the contents of all of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Increasingly high requirements are placed on homogenizing and dispersing media of the same or different aggregate states as a precondition of a large number of process steps in chemical or engineering technology, said requirements having to be met with the aid of generally complex static or dynamic mixing systems.
During horizontal drilling, too, there is the requirement to mix a liquid with a powdered substance or a liquid or a suspension if, in order to facilitate and improve the drilling operation, for example a bentonite-water suspension is to be used as a drilling or flushing liquid. Such a suspension keeps the drilling dust in suspension, lubricates the pipe string as it is pulled in and protects the latter against the surrounding earth after a certain hardening phase. In order to vary the characteristics of the suspension, additives, such as soda ash or polymers, can be added.
Drilling liquids are normally mixed in a separate storage tank by means of a stirrer operating in this tank, that is to say a dynamic mixer, or by means of a high-speed pump.
These mixing systems have an increased requirement for space and lead to time delays in the drilling operation if, after a batch of drilling liquid has been used, a new batch has to be prepared. They do not permit a compact design of the overall drilling system.
Static mixing systems are also known which, as opposed to dynamic systems, do not have any stirrer and require less space.
The use of static mixers in mixing systems for the production of drilling liquid for horizontal drilling methods is known from German Patent Application 199 18 775.4. In the method described therein for the production of a drilling liquid, the added medium, for example bentonite, is led to the water in powder form upstream or downstream of a hydraulic pump that transports the drilling liquid to the drilling system A static mixing section, which homogenizes the added substance and the water, can be arranged downstream of the pump.
A static mixer, as known for example from “wägen+dosieren” (weighing and metering) 3/1997, pages 23 to 26, generally comprises a plurality of different types of individual mixer elements which are connected one after another and can be inserted into a feed line or discharge line system with the aid of an adapter. Each of these mixer elements has one or more deflection surfaces which, if necessary, are penetrated by one or more passages. The deflection surfaces following one another either within a mixer element or in mixer elements connected downstream are in this case always inclined at small angles with respect to one another and likewise, coincident with the flow direction of the medium flowing in the line, have a small angle of inclination that differs from 90°.
The deflection surfaces, which are at a particular axial angle in relation to one another and to the flow direction, produce forcible guidance of the flow, so that its flow direction rotates repeatedly. The passages which may penetrate the deflection surfaces likewise run at angles to one another and to the deflection surfaces so that both the flow is divided up and a repeated change in the flow direction takes place. The individual streams are guided together again at other deflection surfaces.
This repeated division, deflection and guiding together of the media has the effect of its homogenization or dispersion.
The selection of different mixer geometries is made as a function of the Reynolds number which, as the quotient of the inertial forces and the frictional forces, depends, amongst other things, on the material characteristics of the media. At a critical flow velocity, the inertial forces exceed a characteristic value, as compared with the frictional forces, so that the flow becomes turbulent.
Furthermore, the selection of the mixer geometries and the size of the overall mixing system, that is to say the number of mixer elements connected one after another, is made as a function of the permissible pressure loss in the flow, which primarily has to be assessed in view of the critical velocity required for the turbulence and the requirements of the process steps which follow.
Furthermore, the geometry of the deflection surfaces and passage openings and their arrangement relative to one another and to the flow direction have to be arranged in such a way that, as far as possible, the absence of dead zones can be ensured, since these prevent homogeneous mixing.
A considerable disadvantage of the known static mixers resides in the fact that the mixer elements, produced with complex geometry, have to be produced in complicated production processes, which give rise to a considerable expenditure in time and cost. Above all, the partly solid configuration of the mixers with differently aligned passages makes a high expenditure on material necessary.
A further disadvantage of known mixers is that cleaning of the mixers is made considerably more difficult, because of the deflection surfaces being at changing angles to one another Reliable, simple cleaning, for example by means of a cleaning fluid merely flowing through the mixer, is inadequate.
The invention is accordingly based on the object of providing a static mixer which makes possible efficient homogenization and dispersion of various media with constructionally simple mixer elements, which can additionally be produced cost-effectively and are simple to clean.
The object is achieved by a mixer element having at least one deflection surface which is aligned at an angle of 70 to 110° to the main flow direction of the media in the line through which flow passes.
Here, the invention is based on the idea that during the impact of the media on the deflection surface, which is inclined only slightly with respect to the flow direction, and during the flow around its edges, shear forces are produced which lead to swirling and mixing of the media.
The particular advantage of the mixer element according to the invention lies in its simple construction, which can be fabricated cost-effectively and without special machines.
A further advantage is that, because of the special alignment of the deflection surface, there are no acute angles between the surface and the surrounding housing or the wall. The cleaning of the mixer element is therefore made considerably easier.
Surprisingly, the deflection surface inclined only slightly with respect to the flow direction permits very good homogenization of the media to be mixed thoroughly, which can be improved still further by a plurality of deflection surfaces connected one after another.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the deflection surface is arranged at an angle of 90° with respect to the flow direction of the media, that is to say it is at right angles to the flow direction.
The particularly good result achieved in this way was not to be suspected on the basis of the known considerations of the average person skilled in the art which, on account of the assumed requirements of the pressure drop to be minimized as far as possible, of the most variable possible forcible guidance of the flow and of the avoidance of dead zones, would make a deflection surface inclined only slightly with respect to the flow direction or one at right angles thereto appear particularly unsuitable. This is because a deflection surface arranged in this way permits the production of dead zones located behind it and, to a considerable extent, “brakes” the flow impinging on it. This leads to a considerable reduction in the pressure and the velocity of the liquid. Furthermore, the deflection surface according to the invention dispenses with directed forcible guidance, which leads to repeated specific rotation of the flow direction of the medium.
In the mixer element according to the invention, the form of the cross section of the deflection surface can correspond substantially to the cross-sectional outline of the line through which flow passes. However, its diameter is advantageously smaller than that of the line, so that at least one passage for the medium deflected by the deflection surface is produced between the line and the deflection surface.
The deflection surface can be fastened directly by fastening means to the line through which flow passes or to a housing of a mixer element to be inserted into the line.
In a particular embodiment, it can additionally be advantageous to insert the mixer element into the line via an adapter.
The housing of the mixer element can advantageously be configured in such a way that the side surfaces of the housing located behind the deflection surface in the flow direction are used to guide the medium.
For example, they can taper in the manner of a funnel, in order to narrow toward a passage opening leading to a deflection surface of a deflection surface connected downstream or located in the same mixing system.
As a result of the narrowing, the pressure energy of the flow is partly converted into kinetic energy. The shear forces which are produced on the impact on the deflection surface and promote homogenization are therefore increased.
In a further advantageous embodiment, the deflection surface can be provided with openings, which permit the medium striking the surface to be divided. An improvement in the homogenization can therefore be achieved but without cleaning of the system being made considerably more difficult.
The individual mixer elements can be connected one behind another in a large number in a mixing system. It can additionally also be advantageous to connect mixer elements beside one another in parallel if, for example, the flow rate of media is to be increased.
The mixer element according to the invention can be used for the homogenization and mixing of gases, liquids, suspensions or dispersions. It can therefore be used in a large number of different processes and apparatuses, for example from the areas of chemical or process engineering, and also in the plastics industry, water treatment or the foodstuffs industry.
Specifically, it can be used for mixing drilling liquids, for example bentonite-water suspensions, which are needed for example for horizontal or vertical drilling.
In the following text, the invention will be explained in more detail using an exemplary embodiment illustrated in the drawings, in which:
An individual element 1 of the mixing system comprises a housing 2 with two inclined surfaces 3 and 4, which narrow in the manner of a funnel toward a passage opening 5. They allow the passage of the medium flowing into the mixing system through the inlet opening 6 in the direction of the arrow.
The deflection surface 9 (of which there may be more than one as shown in
In the exemplary embodiment, a mixing system is assembled from three individual elements each having a deflection surface and a top piece 12 and an end piece 17. These are sealed off from one another by seals 20. As shown in
The top piece has an inlet opening 6, which opens onto the first deflection surface, machined as a constituent part of the top piece. The opening is machined in the manner of a funnel.
The end piece 17, on the other hand, does not have a deflection surface, but lets the medium out through the outlet opening 16. End piece 17 and top piece 12 are provided with a thread (not shown here), into which common pipe screw fixings can be screwed.
The media flow into the top piece 12 via the inlet opening 6 and strike the deflection surface 9. There, they are deflected and flow through the passages 11a, 11b, 11c into the mixing chamber 19. They are to some extent guided along the oblique surfaces 3 and 4. The media then flow through the passage opening 5 onto a further deflection surface. They flow through a second mixer element in the manner just described.
After flowing through the last mixer element, they pass into the outlet opening 16 of the end piece 17 and leave the mixing system.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 19 759 U | Apr 2000 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1977300 | Blunt | Oct 1934 | A |
2561457 | Beales et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
3045984 | Cochran | Jul 1962 | A |
3417967 | Richens et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3473787 | Bartlett | Oct 1969 | A |
3593964 | Morane | Jul 1971 | A |
3693457 | Pilat | Sep 1972 | A |
3744762 | Schlicht | Jul 1973 | A |
3791255 | Fox et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3856270 | Hemker | Dec 1974 | A |
3935910 | Gaudy et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3941355 | Simpson | Mar 1976 | A |
4050479 | Baumann | Sep 1977 | A |
4051065 | Venema | Sep 1977 | A |
4087862 | Tsien | May 1978 | A |
4124309 | Yao | Nov 1978 | A |
4264212 | Tookey | Apr 1981 | A |
4313680 | Honnen | Feb 1982 | A |
4334788 | Miner | Jun 1982 | A |
4340311 | Crandal | Jul 1982 | A |
4344752 | Gallagher, Jr. | Aug 1982 | A |
4361407 | Pellegrini | Nov 1982 | A |
4370062 | Moody | Jan 1983 | A |
4409850 | Zeck | Oct 1983 | A |
4412582 | Mecozzi et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4415275 | Dietrich | Nov 1983 | A |
4416610 | Gallagher, Jr. | Nov 1983 | A |
4441823 | Power | Apr 1984 | A |
4514095 | Ehrfeld et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4548525 | Priebe | Oct 1985 | A |
4647212 | Hankison | Mar 1987 | A |
4684254 | Goudy, Jr. | Aug 1987 | A |
4729665 | Goudy, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4854721 | Hume | Aug 1989 | A |
4869849 | Hirose et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4874248 | Luetzelschwab | Oct 1989 | A |
4907725 | Durham | Mar 1990 | A |
4981368 | Smith | Jan 1991 | A |
5145256 | Wiemers et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5161456 | Ehrlinger et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5335992 | Holl | Aug 1994 | A |
5404913 | Gilligan | Apr 1995 | A |
5522661 | Tsukada | Jun 1996 | A |
5547281 | Brooks | Aug 1996 | A |
5549222 | Schroeder | Aug 1996 | A |
5688478 | Pounds et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690820 | Becnel et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5839828 | Glanville | Nov 1998 | A |
5887977 | Morikawa | Mar 1999 | A |
5967658 | Mohajer | Oct 1999 | A |
6217009 | Rowe | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6279611 | Uematsu et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6305835 | Farrar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337308 | Adams et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6447158 | Farkas | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6530684 | Kolb et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6595682 | Mathys et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
7575071 | Schauerte | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020125046 | Schauerte | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040100864 | Schauerte | May 2004 | A1 |
20070211570 | Schauerte | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080041449 | Schauerte | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
182 064 | Jan 1936 | CH |
687 926 | Feb 1940 | DE |
77 33 456 | Nov 1978 | DE |
36 18 062 | Dec 1987 | DE |
4217373 | Dec 1993 | DE |
199 18 775 | Oct 1999 | DE |
10032302 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0 191 453 | Feb 1986 | EP |
196280 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0 994 235 | Oct 1999 | EP |
2063695 | Jun 1981 | GB |
61242624 | Oct 1986 | JP |
725689 | Apr 1980 | SU |
1456205 | Feb 1989 | SU |
WO 8803052 | May 1988 | WO |
WO0180985 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070211570 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |