The invention relates to a static mixing element in accordance with the preamble of claim 1. The invention also relates to a static mixer including such a mixing element.
A static mixing apparatus is known from the prior art in accordance with CH 642 564 which consists of a tubular housing and includes at least one mixing element arranged therein. The mixing element consists of crossing bars which have an angle with respect to the tube axis. The bars of the mixing elements are arranged in at least two groups. The bars within each group are aligned substantially parallel. The bars of the one group intersect with the bars of the other group.
DE 44 28 813 shows a static mixing apparatus which, in contrast to CH 642 564, has crossing bars which overlap in the region of the points of intersection. This local widening of the bars which are made as sheet steel bars in DE 44 28 813 serves for the reinforcement and/or for the forming of a shape matched connection of adjacent bars. A groove is cut into the widened portion which receives an adjacent bar made of steel sheet material.
EP 0 856 353 A1 shows a module which is part of a static mixing device which is provided for a plastically flowable mixing product having a critical residence time. The device includes a tubular housing in which bars are arranged. The bars are inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis of the housing; they cross substantially on a straight line perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. The module includes a sleeve which is insertable into the housing. The inner wall of the static mixing device guiding the mixing product is formed by inner sides of the sleeve. The bars are made in the manner of mandrels each having an apex facing toward the direction of movement of the mixing product and a base fastened to the inner side of the sleeve. Each apex forms an intermediate space with respect to the inner wall of the device.
The development of the mixer in accordance with CH 642 564 in 1979 represented an unexpected improvement in static mixing technology for media flowing in a laminar manner. This mixer has proved itself since then and it is used successfully in a very broad field of applications with largely highly viscous media. Attempts were made again and again to improve this mixer in the almost 30 following years. However, only marginal improvements were able to be recorded despite a substantial effort and/or expense. A modified mixer having a changed, concave bar cross-section was thus protected in U.S. Pat. No. 6,467,949 B1. Independent measurements (M. Heniche, P. A. Tanguy, M. F. Reeder, J. B. Fasano, AlChE Journal Vol 51, No. 1, January 2005) showed only slight differences with respect to pressure loss and mixing efficiency for this modified static mixer with respect to the prior art. In another recently published paper (S. Liu, PhD Thesis, McMaster University, 2005), a plurality of modifications of the prior art in accordance with CH 642 564 for the improvement of mixing efficiency and pressure drop were examined using different techniques. The mixing elements in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 6,467,949 B1 were also measured in this paper. Liu records a 15% lower pressure loss with the same mixing effect or one which is a little worse. By a further change in the bar cross-section, Liu additionally achieves a somewhat better mixing effect with a pressure loss reduced by 7.5% with the respect to the mixer in accordance with CH 642 564. These examples of studies for the improvement and examination of the mixing behaviour of static mixers which have a similar structure to the mixer in accordance with CH 642 564 show that no substantial improvements in mixing efficiency and pressure drop of laminar mixers were able to be achieved to date.
Surprisingly, static mixer elements can be found to which the above statement does not apply, where even a contrary statement is correct. The clear reduction in pressure loss observed using a mixing element in accordance with the invention with a similar or improved mixing efficiency recorded by the mixing elements in accordance with the invention is a technical breakthrough.
It is the object of the invention to provide an improvement for the named static mixer with which a lower pressure loss can be recorded with a comparable or improved mixing efficiency.
This object is satisfied by the static mixing element defined in the following.
A static mixing element in accordance with the invention has a width Db and is suitable for installation in a hollow body with a width substantially equal to Db. The static mixing element includes a plurality of bar elements, with a first arrangement including at least one first bar element and being arranged cross-wise with respect to a second arrangement which includes at least one second bar element. The first arrangement and the second arrangement include an angle different from 0° to the main direction of flow. The first arrangement and the second arrangement include an angle larger than 0°. On projection of the first arrangement and of the second arrangement onto a projection plane which is disposed normal to the main direction of flow, intermediate spaces are disposed at least partly between mutually adjacent bar elements. The relative sum z of the widths of the bar elements measured in the direction of the width Db of the mixing element is smaller than 95% of the width Db of the mixing element.
The further features relate to advantageous embodiments of the static mixing element as well as of a static mixer which includes the mixing element in accordance with the invention.
The main direction of flow is preferably disposed in the direction of the longitudinal axis of a hollow body in which the mixing element is received. A crossing point is formed by the first arrangement and the second arrangement in whose proximity a spacer element can be arranged. The spacer element can be made as a local thickened portion or widened portion of at least one bar element. The number of the bar elements can amount to 4 to 10 in the projection plane. At least 2 bar elements are advantageously provided per arrangement. The first and the third bar elements are part of a first arrangement of bar elements disposed in a first plane. The second and the fourth bar elements are part of a second arrangement of bar elements disposed in a second plane. At least some of the bar elements of the first arrangement can be arranged in a third plane which is arranged offset to the first plane. Alternatively or in addition thereto, some of the bar elements of the second arrangement can be arranged in a fourth plane, with the fourth plane being arranged offset to the second plane. The bar elements have a width (H). The sum (ΣHi) of the widths (H) of the bar elements in the projection plane in relation to the diameter (D) of the hollow body is fixed by the parameter z defined in the following. The parameter z is in particular less than 95%, preferably less than 85%, in particular less than 75%, particularly preferably less than 65%. The static mixing apparatus includes a static mixing element as well as a hollow body or a sleeve to receive the static mixing element. The static mixing element can be fastened to the hollow body or to the sleeve, with the static mixing element and the hollow body or the sleeve being able to consist of a single component.
The static mixing element can be fastened to the inner wall of the hollow body or of the sleeve in the region of the line of intersection of the first plane with the second plane and/or in the region of at least some of the ends of the bar elements.
The preferred use of a static mixing element in accordance with one of the preceding embodiments takes place for media with a laminar flow, in particular polymer melts or other highly viscous fluids.
The invention will be explained in the following with reference to the drawings. There are shown:
Since it is generally known that the pressure loss reduces when the cross-section through which there is a flow is as free as possible of obstacles, it appears obvious to avoid obstacles in the flow to reduce the pressure loss. However, a poorer mixing would then have to be expected after the same mixing distance because, according to the previous opinion, fluid elements flow through the gaps thus created without being substantially deflected, that is substantially following the main direction of flow without mixing with other fluid molecules. Surprisingly, arrangements of bar elements in accordance with
A bar element can be designed, for example, as a tube or as a plate-like, disk-like or bar-like element. The cross-section of the bar element can be free of edges, e.g. have a circular or elliptical cross-section. The cross-section can include edges, that is, for example, can have a rectangular or diamond-shaped cross-section. The connection lines between the edges can be straight or curved, can in particular be convex or concave, which is realised, for example, in EP 1 305 108 B1. A bar element can project at least section-wise out of the associated arrangement, for example have a wavy structure. In this case, the previously described plane of the arrangement is to be understood as a middle plane.
Furthermore, the bar elements can also have an irregular structure, e.g. a wavy surface, in the direction of an arrangement, i.e. in the corresponding plane or parallel to the middle plane. The width H of the bar elements is in this case defined as the width of the bar elements averaged over the bar length. The individual bar elements also do not have to extend parallel to one another within an arrangement, but they can rather have an angle with respect to the other bar elements of the same arrangement.
The surprising effect of the invention occurs in each of the bar element cross-sections set forth and in each of the bar element shapes; it is therefore largely independent of the cross-section and of the shape of the bar element. If the two arrangements 21 and 31 are projected onto a plane which is disposed normal to the main direction of flow, that is normal to the longitudinal axis 8 of the enveloping hollow body 10, the bar elements of the arrangements 21 and 31 in accordance with
In accordance with
If the widths of the bar elements are all the same, it applies to z:
z=N*H/D,
where N is the sum of the bar elements of the first arrangement 21 and of the second arrangement 31. The outermost bar elements of an arrangement preferably contact the inner wall of the hollow body or have an at best only slight spacing from the inner wall.
The diameter of the hollow body is here in particular set forth for hollow bodies with a circular cross-section. The hollow body can also have an elliptical, polygonal, in particular rectangular or square cross-section. Instead of the diameter, a width measurement Db is then used for z to which the following relationship applies:
or, if the widths of the bar elements and the spacings are each the same,
Db=N*H+(N−1)*a.
As above, the following then applies in the same way accordingly to z:
z=N*H/Db.
The width Db of the hollow body substantially corresponds to the width of the mixing element neglecting manufacturing and assembly tolerances. In accordance with the invention, in any case z<95%, preferably z<85%, in particular z<75%, particularly preferably z<65%. At the same time, in accordance with the invention, the sum of the surfaces of the bar elements of two crossing arrangements projected in perpendicular manner onto a plane also amounts in each case to less than 95% of the total cross-sectional area of the plane, preferably less than 85% of the total plane, in particular less than 75% of the total plan and particularly preferably less than 65% of the total plane. The number N of bar elements preferably amounts to a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10. Usual production tolerances or installation tolerances are not considered in this formula. If the bar elements do not contact the inner wall of the hollow body, the installation and removal of a plurality of completely prefabricated mixing elements can be effected more simply. Any and all thermal expansions of the mixing element can take place largely unhindered during operation. Depending on the flowing medium and on the construction design of the mixing element, dead zones can form in marginal regions if the bar elements are directly connected to the inner wall of the hollow body. It can also be advantageous for this reason to provide a small spacing between the inner wall of the hollow body and at least some of the bar elements, as has already been presented in EP 0 856 353 A1.
A further embodiment is shown in
In an extensive study, the geometrical parameters which describe the static mixing element were systematically varied and the resulting properties of the mixer were evaluated with respect to pressure loss and mixing efficiency.
So that static mixers of different lengths can be compared with one another with respect to pressure loss, the pressure loss was calculated per mixer length in the optimisation.
The mixing quality in a plane A is described by means of the coefficient of variation CoV. It is defined as the standard deviation of the concentration distribution in A standardised with the mean value of the concentration
With a better mixing, the CoV becomes smaller. For the comparison of different mixers, the reduction in the coefficient of variation CoV was determined over a predetermined mixer length with the same distribution and thus also the same CoV before the mixers; the mixer which has a smaller CoV in accordance with the predetermined length therefore mixes more intensely or better.
The result of this study shows that mixing elements have significantly more favourable properties which have a spacing (a) between the crossing bar elements. The spacing (a) is preferably approximately of the same magnitude as the width (H) of the bar elements. The pressure loss with the same throughput and the same flow cross-section can hereby be substantially reduced with respect to the prior art with the same and/or an improved mixing quality after a predetermined length. A reduction by ⅔ of the pressure loss is possible with the same mixing quality or even better.
The result of this study is shown in
In accordance with the embodiments in accordance with
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07110892 | Jun 2007 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/057226 | 6/10/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/30/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/000642 | 12/31/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3406947 | Harder | Oct 1968 | A |
4062524 | Brauner | Dec 1977 | A |
4093188 | Horner | Jun 1978 | A |
4220416 | Brauner et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4692030 | Tauscher et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4865460 | Friedrich | Sep 1989 | A |
RE34255 | Friedrich | May 1993 | E |
5378063 | Tsukada | Jan 1995 | A |
5564827 | Signer | Oct 1996 | A |
5620252 | Maurer | Apr 1997 | A |
5688047 | Signer | Nov 1997 | A |
5813762 | Fleischli et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5865537 | Streiff et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6109781 | Ogasawara et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6203188 | Maurer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6394644 | Streiff | May 2002 | B1 |
6595679 | Schuchardt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595682 | Mathys et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6637928 | Schuchardt | Oct 2003 | B2 |
8375708 | Forster et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20010012235 | Schuchardt | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20040125691 | Streiff | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20100202248 | Hirschberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
642 564 | Apr 1984 | CH |
642564 | Apr 1984 | CH |
23 28 795 | Jan 1975 | DE |
4428813 | Feb 1996 | DE |
0 070 915 | Feb 1983 | EP |
0 154 013 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0 856 353 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0856353 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1 123 730 | Aug 2001 | EP |
56-62531 | May 1981 | JP |
58-27633 | Feb 1983 | JP |
8-309170 | Nov 1996 | JP |
9-122465 | May 1997 | JP |
2005-532900 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2091146 | Sep 1997 | RU |
WO 0209858 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03097537 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100202248 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |