This application is a national phase application based on international application no. PCT/GB2003/004755, filed Nov. 5, 2003, which claims the priority of Great Britain Patent Application No. 0226003.2, filed Nov. 7, 2002, the content of both of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to the field of wireless-communications networks. For example, the invention finds application in a network organised according to the UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System) standards. In particular, the invention is concerned with the receiver architecture of a participant in a wireless-communications network, such as a base station or a mobile telephone.
As mentioned above, the scaling unit 20 scales the soft decisions that are produced by the rake receiver 18 for decoding in the codec 22. A certain degree of scaling is required to optimise the operation of the codec 22. The scaling unit 20 controls the degree of scaling that it applies to the soft decisions by monitoring its own output on feedback path 26. That is to say, the scaling unit 20 monitors the scaled soft decisions that it sends to the codec 22 and uses the monitored soft decisions in an algorithm which determines how the degree of scaling should be adjusted.
The details of the operation of the algorithm are not important and can vary from one implementation to another. However, the algorithm will produce an output in the form of an adjustment to be made to the scaling factor that is applied to the soft decisions and this output is derived by monitoring the power of the soft decisions arriving on the feedback path 26. A significant disadvantage of this approach will now be discussed.
S=02+12+22+32+22+12+02+12+22+32+22+12+02+12+22+12+02+12=45
P=45/18=2.5
S=02+12+22+22+22+12+02+12+22+22+22+12+02+12+22+12+02+12=35
P=35/18=1.9
It will be seen that when the signal becomes saturated at an amplitude of two, the power value is drastically different to the power value that is obtained when the signal is not saturated. Therefore, in situations where the signal might become saturated, the value of the power of the signal might not be a good parameter to monitor.
Sometimes, in the receiver chain shown in
One aim of the present invention is to ameliorate, at least in part, the disadvantage discussed above.
According to one aspect the invention provides a method of conditioning signal values being conveyed to a decoder in a wireless-communications network participant, the method comprising scaling the values, monitoring the probability distribution of the amplitudes of the scaled values and using the information gained through the monitoring step to determine if the degree of scaling should be adjusted.
The invention also consists in a wireless-communications network participant, comprising a decoder for decoding a signal received at the participant, scaling means for scaling values of the signal being conveyed to the decoder, monitoring means for monitoring the probability distribution of the amplitudes of the scaled values and control means for using information supplied by the monitoring means to determine if the degree of scaling should be adjusted. Such a method can be implemented by as a computer program. Such programs can be accommodated by an appropriate data carrier, such as a read only memory.
Thus, the invention provides an alternative scheme for scaling a stream of signal values which is less effected by saturation.
In one embodiment, the probability distribution of the scaled values is monitored by determining the fraction of a group of signal values that exceed a certain amplitude.
The invention can be used, for example, in a participant of a 3G telecommunications network and the decoder is a bit-rate signal decoder using, for example, the Viterbi or max log-MAP algorithm.
By way of example only, an embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
In the embodiment that will now be described, the power of the signal on path 26 is not the parameter which is used to control the algorithm which scales the soft decisions. Instead, a parameter based on the cumulative probability density function (CDF) of the signal is used. In fact, the parameter that is used to control the scaling algorithm is 1-CDF and is hereinafter termed the complementary CDF and is referred to as Q for ease of reference.
The CDF for a given amplitude value of a digital signal is the ratio of the number of samples in the signal where the amplitude is equal to or less than the given value versus the total number of samples in the signal. The parameter Q is the ratio of the number of samples where the amplitude value exceeds the given value versus the total number of samples in the signal. That is to say, CDF+Q=1.
To illustrate the calculation of the parameter Q, we will use the example of the saturated signal of
Therefore, it follows that CDF, or CDF based measurements, can be used to make an assessment of the amplitude profile of a signal without being grossly effected by saturation. Of course, the degree of effect that saturation has on a CDF or Q value depends on the amplitude value at which saturation occurs relative to the amplitude at which the CDF or Q function is evaluated. For example, if the amplitude value of saturation is less than the amplitude value at which Q is evaluated, then the Q value will be significantly distorted by saturation. Therefore, it is important to keep the amplitude value at which the Q function is calculated to a level below the saturation limit.
Returning to the embodiment, with the exception of scaling unit 20, the operation of the receiver chain is much the same as that described earlier with reference to
It is worth bearing in mind, as will be readily apparent to the skilled person, that the waveforms shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0226003.2 | Nov 2002 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB03/04755 | 11/5/2003 | WO | 00 | 11/16/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/042934 | 5/21/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5267272 | Cai et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271042 | Borth et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5404315 | Nakano et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
6347124 | Antia et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
20020168013 | Attallah et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030156563 | Papasakellariou et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20070286272 | Richards et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0247276 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02082694 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03085917 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060179398 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |