This disclosure relates to arrangement of magnets in the stator of electric motors, particularly for power tools.
In a brushed DC motor construction, the motor stator magnets must be retained within the motor housing on the inner surface of the stator ring or the stator lamination stack. Ordinarily, these magnets have been glued or adhered to the metallic stator housing. In adhering the magnets to the metallic surface so that the magnets do not shift during use, various types of adhesives have been used. Alternatively, the magnets may be overmolded using an overmold resin layer on the inner surface of the housing. The problem with surface-mounting the magnets is that the tolerances associated with the magnets, the adhesive, and/or the overmold necessitate a large air gap between the rotor and the stator. The large air gap reduces the magnetic flux of the stator magnets as applied to the rotor. What it needed is a mechanism to reduce these tolerances and reduce the air gap between the stator housing and the rotor.
According to an aspect of the invention, a power tool is provided including a housing, a permanent magnet electric motor in the housing, and an output member coupled to the electric motor. The electric motor includes a stator and a rotor arranged rotatably inside the stator. The stator includes at least a North pole and a South pole and defines at least one magnet pocket at each pole. The stator includes a lamination stack of identically-shaped magnetically-conductive laminations with the identically-shaped pockets stamped therein and secured together in alignment to form the at least one magnet pocket at each pole. Each magnet pocket is contained within the lamination stack distanced from the inner and outer surfaces of the lamination stack. The stator further includes at least one permanent magnet embedded within each magnet pocket of each pole
According to an embodiment, the stator defines several magnet pockets at each pole, and only one permanent magnet is embedded within each magnet pocket. In a further embodiment, the stator further defines air holes between the respective magnet pockets within each pole.
According to an embodiment, the stator defines multiple magnet pockets at each pole, each magnet pocket holding multiple permanent magnets. In one embodiment, the magnets are flat magnets, and the magnet pocket include rectangular-shaped portions mated at an angle, each portion holding one of the permanent magnets substantially perpendicularly to the rotor, wherein mating points of the rectangular-shaped portions define air pockets between the permanent magnets embedded within each magnet pocket.
According to an embodiment, the inner surface of the stator lamination stack defines two inter-pole spacers between the poles, the inter-pole spacers providing air flow to the rotor.
According to an embodiment, the end portions of the stator lamination stack are overmolded to securely hold the permanent magnets within the magnet pockets. In another embodiment, the magnets may be secured inside the pockets via an adhesive. Alternatively, the magnet pockets are configured to form-fittingly hold the permanent magnets therein without any need for overmold or adhesive.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure in any way.
Referring now to
The motor includes a stator assembly 30. The stator assembly 30 includes a stator housing 32, a stator lamination stack (or a flux ring) 34 and magnets 36. The flux ring 34 is an expandable or split flux ring. An armature 40 includes a shaft 42, a rotor 44 and a commutator 50 coupled with the shaft 42. The rotor 44 includes laminations 46 and windings 48. The motor 14 also includes end plates 52 and 54. End plate 52 includes a front bearing 56 which supports one end of a shaft 42. The shaft 42 is coupled with a pinion 60 that is part of the output member 20. Brushes 62 and 64 are associated with the commutator 50. A rear bearing 70 is also coupled with the end plate 54 to balance rotation of the shaft 42.
The power tool 10 is illustrated as a drill, however, any type of power tool may be used in accordance with this invention. The power tool 10 includes a housing 12 which surrounds a motor 14. An activation member 16 is coupled with the motor and a power source 18. The power source 18 includes either a power cord (AC current) or includes a battery (DC current) (not shown). The motor 14 is coupled with an output member 20 that includes a transmission 22 and a chuck 24. The chuck 24 is operable to retain a tool (not shown).
The designation 34 illustrated in
According to the embodiment shown in
According to an embodiment, the magnets may be arcuate or flat magnets arranged on the inner surface of the lamination stack 34. As described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,522,042; 7,088,024 and 6,983,529, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, the magnets may anchored to the lamination stack 34 by an overmolding process.
It should be noted that the two stator assemblies discussed above are merely for illustration purposes and are not intended to narrow the scope of this disclosure in any way. Embodiments of the invention discussed hereinafter can be applied to any stator assembly with permanent magnets mounted therein.
Typically in motor assemblies described above, a physical (i.e., mechanical) air gap is provided between the outer surface of the rotor assembly and the inner surface of the stator assembly. This air gap accounts for tolerances, i.e., the permissible limit of variations in the dimension or size, associated with the stator and rotor assemblies. In a typical stator assembly (for example, those shown in
While the mechanical air gap between the rotor and stator assemblies is needed to account for their respective tolerances, air has a relatively low magnetic permeability and reduces the overall flux of the stator assembly applied to the rotor assembly. In addition, in motors where magnets are overmolded, the overmolded resin further increases the distance between the magnets and the rotor. The overmolded resin therefore further affects the overall flux of the stator assembly applied to the rotor. In an exemplary conventional power tool motor assembly with overmolded magnets, the overall distance taken up by air gap and the overmold layer combined was measured to be between 0.93 mm to 1.45 mm. This distance, which is known as the “magnetic air gap,” refers to the space between the magnets and the rotor taken up by non-magnetically-conductive material such as air, adhesive, resin, etc.
According to an aspect of the invention, In order to minimize the magnetic air gap between the magnets and the rotor assembly, an embedded magnet design is provided. As shown in the perspective view of
In the embedded magnet design according to the present embodiment of the invention, the magnetic flux applied from the stator assembly to the rotor assembly is improved for several reasons. First, in this design, a magnetically-conductive section 404 of the lamination stack 400 separates the magnets 420 from the rotor assembly. Unlike air, the magnetically-conductive section 404 is highly permeable and therefore improves the overall magnetic flux of the stator assembly 400. Also, the embedded design according to this embodiment eliminates or minimizes the use of any adhesive or overmold to secure the magnets 420 to the stator assembly 400. This further removes another barrier from the path of the magnetic flux. Moreover, since the tolerances associated with the magnets 420 and the adhesive discussed above are effectively eliminated, the total tolerance of the stator assembly can be drastically reduced. In an exemplary embodiment, the total tolerance level for the stator assembly may be reduced from ±0.2 mm for comparable conventional designs to ±0.1 mm or less for the embedded design. The lower tolerance allows for a smaller mechanical air gap between the rotor assembly and the stator assembly. The reduction in the mechanical air gap in turn, combined with the elimination or reduction in the adhesive and/or overmold layer between the magnets and the rotor assembly, substantially decreases the length of the overall magnetic air gap, thus improving the overall magnetic flux applied from the stator assembly to the rotor assembly.
It was found by the inventors that the embedded magnet design described herein, allows for substantial reduction in the magnetic air gap. According to an embodiment, the total magnetic air gap between the stator lamination stack and the rotor may be reduced from 0.93 to 1.45 mm in conventional non-embedded (i.e., surface-mounted) magnet motors to approximately 0.70 mm or less in the embedded design. In one embodiment, the total magnetic flux/magnet volume (k−Max/mm3), as measured from the rotor assembly, is increased by approximately 49% to 56% in the embedded design as compared to conventional non-embedded (i.e., surface-mounted) magnet motors, given the same size/grade magnets. Accordingly, in order to obtain comparable power output levels as conventional surface-mounted magnet motors, smaller magnets may be utilized in the stator assembly. It was found by the inventors that to obtain similar output levels as the conventional surface-mounted magnet motors, the embedded magnet design according to this embodiment reduced the total amount of magnetic material used by 30% to 40%. This may translate to substantial cost-saving given the high cost of rare earth material.
It should be noted that the embedded design according to this embodiment provides other advantages in addition to improvements in the magnetic flux density. For example, since the embedded design provides a smoother surface 406 than conventional stator assemblies, the cogging effect of the stator assemblies associated with the unevenness of the magnets in conventional designs is reduced. Moreover, the dimensional flexibility of the laminated magnet pockets 402 makes it possible to mix and match different grade magnets with minor variations in thickness or width as long as the magnets fit inside the magnet pockets 402.
Furthermore, as described in Black & Decker's application Ser. No. 13/112,136, filed May 20, 2011, which is incorporated herein by its entirety, the outer magnets may be desirably thicker than the inner magnets within each pole to provide higher demagnetization resistance at the pole tips. Alternatively, the outer magnets may be thinner than the inner magnets, but made of higher grade magnetic material to still provide higher demagnetization resistance at the pole tips. Accordingly, in an embodiment of this invention, the magnet pockets 402 within each pole may be provided with different widths and/or thickness levels. In particular, the two outer magnet pockets 402 within each pole may have difference widths and/or thickness levels than the inner magnet pockets to accommodate the varying magnet thickness at the pole tips.
It should be noted that while the exemplary stator housing shown in these figures is a lamination stack, the present design is not limited to a lamination stack and the teachings of this disclosure may be applied to a flux ring or other types of stator assemblies as well.
A further improvement to the embodiment of the invention described above is discussed herein. According to an embodiment, while the conductive wall 404 between the magnets 420 and the rotor assembly increases the magnetic flux density at the rotor, the magnetically-conductive spacers 408 conversely allow for some unwanted leakage of the magnetic flux. Accordingly, in an embodiment of the invention as shown in
Referring back to
According to an alternative and/or further embodiment, as shown in
It should be understood that while the exemplary embodiments above were discussed with references to two-pole stators, the embedded magnet concept of this disclosure can be applied to a stator with any number of poles.
A second aspect of the invention is discussed herein. In a stator assembly, in order to identify the polarity of the stator, a polarity keying feature such as a notch is typically provided in the stator housing. The placement of the notch for polarity keying is important for proper alignment of the rotor inside the stator housing as well as proper assembly of the stator housing inside the power tool. The notch may, for example, designate the center of North pole or the South pole for power tool that are bias-neutral (such as impact drivers). In other products that are forward-biased (i.e., the motor is more likely to move in the forward direction than in the reverse direction, such as drills), the notch may be off-center with respect to the pole so that the magnetic flux is biased for forward rotor rotation. Typically, a corresponding projection is provided in the tool housing to fit into the notch when the stator is placed inside the tool housing. This helps ensure proper alignment of the stator within the power tool housing.
If the stator housing is a flux ring, the notch may be removed from the ring using a machining or punching operation, or using another common material removal operation. The ring may alternatively be pre-assembled with the notch, for example, via a powder-metal or a similar process. The notch in this case may be, for example, 2 mm to 4 mm in depth. The notch may then be filled with plastic material.
If the stator housing is a lamination stack instead of a flux ring, as discussed above with respect to the first aspect of the invention, removing the notch becomes more complicated. In this case, the notch would have to be removed from multiple laminations at the end of the stack, but not the other laminations within the stack. The laminations are manufactured using a stamping tool configured to stamp an identical layout (e.g., via a stamping die) on all the laminations. Providing the notch on the end of the lamination stack would require a different stamping tool with a different stamping die to be dedicated just to the end laminations with the notch. Also, even though the more advanced stamping tools are configurable to add or remove features from a layout, adding and removing the notch feature for the notched laminations is time consuming and complicates the process. Furthermore, as previously discussed, it may be necessary to place the notch in different locations based on the product, i.e., for forward-bias keying for tools such as drills. Thus, different sets of end laminations with the notches at different locations may need to be stamped. The notched laminations must then be matched up with the appropriate lamination stack. This entire process is expensive and burdensome.
Accordingly, in an embodiment of the invention shown in
According to this embodiment, the overmolded end cap 1204a is provided with a keying feature 1206 (also referred to as identification feature 1206) for identifying the polarity of the stator housing, as shown in
According to an embodiment, different mold tools may be needed for molding the keying features (e.g., notches) at different locations. However, since mold tools are far cheaper than lamination tools, the overall cost of manufacturing is drastically reduced. According to another embodiment, the protrusion in the mold tool may be movably adjustable to achieve the desired location of the notch 1206 on the stator assembly in the same mold tool.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the power tool housing may be provided with a lip corresponding to the keying feature 1104 (
It should be understood that while this arrangement is discussed with respect to a conventional motor assembly with surface-mounted magnets (i.e., where magnets are not embedded inside magnet pockets of the stator housing), the overmolded end caps of this embodiment including the keying feature 1206 may be applied to a stator housing having embedded magnets (i.e., as discussed with reference to
Another aspect of the invention is discussed herein still with reference to
According to an embodiment of the invention, as shown in
Although the above-discussed embodiment relates to a motor assembly with surface-mounted magnets (i.e., where magnets are not embedded inside magnet pockets of the stator housing), this arrangement may also be applied to a stator housing made of loose laminations and having embedded magnets. Specifically, as shown in
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the overmold layer discussed above may include a resin compound including magnetic material. The concept of using an overmold magnetic resin to cover the inside surface of the stator housing in order to improve magnetic flux is discussed in Black & Decker's application Ser. No. 13,112,141, filed May 20, 2011. This application is incorporated herein by its entirety. The improvement according to this embodiment utilizes a magnetic resin compound to cover the inner surface as well as the ends of the lamination stack 1200. This arrangement is advantageous because the non-magnetic overmold resin does not efficiently carry magnetic flux, but the end cap portion of the overmold resin increases the overall length of the stator assembly. In an exemplary stator assembly, the overmold end caps increase the length of the stator by 1.5 mm on each end (addition of 3 mm to the total length of the stator housing). Thus, if it is desired to keep the total length of the stator housing unchanged, a lesser number of laminations need to be used to make up for the addition of the overmold at the ends of the lamination stack. This of course further reduces the magnetic flux. According to this embodiment of the invention, using a magnetic resin compound in the overmold material allows for the total length of the stator housing to remain unchanged without sacrificing magnetic flux of the assembly. In other words, the magnetism of the overmold at the ends of the lamination stack makes up for the lower number of laminations in the lamination stack. The overmold material according to this embodiment may includes a magnetic compound, such as iron powder, ferrite powder, or rare-earth material powder, added to the plastic resin prior to overmolding the lamination stack.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/579,345, filed on Dec. 22, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61579345 | Dec 2011 | US |