The present invention relates to a device for preventing tangential rotation of a damper used in a stator.
Anti-rotation devices are placed on stators to prevent the tangential rotation of spring damper assemblies used therein. Typically, these anti-rotation devices consist of pins or lugs welded into machined/EDM milled holes or slots on an edge of the stator inner air seal. The welds inherently crack during engine operation creating a risk of domestic object damage.
There is a need for an improved anti-rotation device for such stator spring damper assemblies which eliminates the risk of such domestic object damage.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved stator damper anti-rotation assembly.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an assembly as above which significantly decreases the risk of domestic object damage.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide an assembly as above which has increased durability and which is easy to produce.
The foregoing objects are attained by the stator damper anti-rotation assembly of the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention, an assembly for preventing rotation of a damper used in a stator system of an engine is provided. The assembly broadly comprises a block which engages a slot in the damper to prevent rotation of the damper. The block is positioned within a groove milled in an inner air seal which forms part of the stator system. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, side portions of the block are brazed to side edges of the groove to effectively eliminate any risk of domestic object damage.
Other details of the stator damper anti-rotation assembly of the present invention, as well as other objects and advantages attendant thereto, are set forth in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals depict like elements.
Referring now to the drawings,
In the instant invention, rotation of the damper 16 is prevented by the presence of a block 22 which fits within a slot 24 in the damper 16. As can be seen from
As shown in
The block 22 may be formed from any suitable metallic or non-metallic material known in the art. As shown in
After the block 22 has been placed in the groove 26, a line of brazing material 49 is applied to each side portion 34 of the block 22 and the corresponding side edge 38 of the groove 26 to secure the block 22 in place. The brazing material 49 may comprise any suitable brazing material known in the art and may be applied using any suitable brazing technique known in the art. The block 22 can be brazed to the inner air seal 14 during normal braze operations, thus eliminating the need for additional operations. The braze joint which is thus formed is a more robust means for attaching the block. If the braze joint fails during engine operation, the block 22 will be trapped in the groove 26, thereby significantly decreasing, and effectively eliminating, any risk of domestic object damage.
As previously discussed, during engine operation, vibrations will tend to cause rotation of the damper 16. This rotation is prevented by the interaction between the block 22 and the slot 24 in the damper 16.
The anti-rotation device and damper assembly of the present invention has increased durability. Further, the anti-rotation device and damper assembly is easily reproducible and lends itself to use in a wide variety of stator assemblies. For example, the size of the block 22 and the damper slot 24 may be varied for different stator assemblies, thereby assuring that the correct damper assembles to the correct inner air seal and eliminating assembly mistakes. Producibility is improved due to the location and the shape of the block 22.
It is apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention a stator damper anti-rotation assembly which fully satisfies the objects, means, and advantages set forth hereinbefore. While the present invention has been described in the context of specific embodiments thereof, other alternatives, modifications, and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art having read the foregoing description. Therefore, it is intended to embrace those alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the broad scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3736811 | Neary | Jun 1973 | A |
3881844 | Hennessey et al. | May 1975 | A |
3986779 | Beckershoff | Oct 1976 | A |
4480957 | Patel et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4721434 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5100292 | Matula et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5215432 | Pickering et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240375 | Wayte | Aug 1993 | A |
5346362 | Bonner et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5681142 | Lewis | Oct 1997 | A |
6155789 | Mannava et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6354803 | Grover et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2106997 | Apr 1983 | GB |
2-153203 | Jun 1990 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030094862 A1 | May 2003 | US |