Stator, dynamoelectric machine, and methods for fabricating same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6768244
  • Patent Number
    6,768,244
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 8, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 27, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A dynamoelectric machine includes a stator having teeth fabricated from a non-magnetic material and containing at least one embedded conductor. The teeth are unitary with a back portion that is mounted to a stator back iron. Permeance variations induced by a stator winding mounted on the non-magnetic stator teeth are low which facilitates a reduction of motor noise. Specifically, since the non-magnetic teeth reduce production of permeance variations, changes in air gap forces between the rotor and the stator are decreased.
Description




BACKGROUND OF INVENTION




This invention relates generally to synchronous machines and, more particularly, to synchronous machines with High Temperature Superconducting rotors.




A synchronous machine typically includes a motor housing, a stator including a plurality of armature windings mounted between a plurality of stator teeth, and a rotor assembly. The rotor assembly includes a rotor core and a rotor shaft extending through the rotor core. The rotor core can be either a salient pole or a cylindrical configuration, and includes a plurality of field windings mounted thereon. The motor housing includes at least one endshield and houses at least a portion of the rotor assembly. Synchronous machines also typically include at least one bearing sized to receive and support the rotor shaft, and at least one inner bearing cap separated from the bearing. Typically, the bearing is positioned between an endshield and an inner bearing cap and facilitates rotation of the rotor shaft when the armature windings are energized.




Recent technological advances have allowed synchronous machines to utilize HTS (high temperature superconducting) ceramic field windings in lieu of conventional copper windings. The HTS windings typically are fabricated from bismuth-2223 ((Bi,Pb)2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10) and are loaded with significantly larger currents than conventional copper windings can sustain. Therefore, machines with HTS windings can generate more powerful magnetic fields in a given volume of space compared to machines with conventional windings. Currently, a cryogenically cooled superconducting machine utilizing a toothless stator winding is able to match the power output of an equally rated conventional machine with as little as one-third the size and weight of the conventional machine.




In a known machine with HTS windings, there are permeance variations in the stator due to the use of conventional slotted magnetic metal cores that generate varying forces in the air gap. The varying air gap forces can produce noise by exciting the machine's structure and the torque is limited by the need to provide space for the teeth structure. However, there are many applications where motor noise is undesirable and small size is important, such as, for example, in a submarine.




Accordingly, it would be desirable to facilitate a reduction in permeance variations and increase torque (power) density in a stator of a synchronous machine with HTS field windings.




SUMMARY OF INVENTION




The present invention is, in one aspect, a machine in which a stator is fabricated such that the teeth of the stator are of a non-magnetic material. Since the teeth are non-magnetic, the teeth do not contribute to generation of noise due to variations in magnetic fields, as do the magnetic teeth in known stators. Specifically, the non-magnetic teeth facilitate a reduction of permeance variations induced by a plurality of stator windings mounted on the stator teeth, thereby lessening variations in the air gap forces between a rotor and the stator. Additionally, utilizing non-magnetic teeth allows for the use of additional windings embedded in the non-magnetic teeth to increase current density and torque. Accordingly, noise caused by the variations in air gap forces is reduced and torque is increased.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a portion of a known magnetic metal stator.





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of one embodiment of a stator magnetic metal yoke with non-magnetic teeth.





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a stator magnetic metal yoke with non-magnetic teeth.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of a stator having non-magnetic teeth.





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of the stator shown in

FIG. 4

during fabrication.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of a stator having a plurality of winding embedded non-magnetic teeth.





FIG. 7

is a cross-sectional view of a stator during fabrication.





FIG. 8

is a cross-sectional view of the stator shown in FIG.


7


.





FIG. 9

is a cross sectional view of a synchronous machine including the stator shown in FIG.


2


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a portion of a known magnetic metal stator


10


including a plurality of teeth


12


and a yoke or back iron


14


. A plurality of armature windings (not shown) are placed in a plurality of slots


16


defined by teeth


12


. Teeth


12


are metal and are fabricated on a plurality of laminations that are stacked together to form stator section


10


. Teeth


12


are unitary with back iron


14


.





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of one embodiment of a stator


20


including a plurality of non-magnetic teeth


22


and a stator magnetic back iron


24


including a plurality of tooth slots


26


. In an exemplary embodiment, non-magnetic teeth


22


are fabricated from a glass laminate. In an alternative exemplary embodiment non-magnetic teeth


22


are fabricated from a non-magnetic fiber, such as, for example, a carbon fiber. It is contemplated that the benefits of reduced permeance variations in an air gap accrue to all stators having a plurality of non-magnetic teeth fabricated from any non-magnetic material. Non-magnetic teeth


22


are connected individually to back iron


24


by inserting a back section


28


of each tooth


22


into a respective tooth slot


26


. In an exemplary embodiment, each back section


28


includes a semi-cylindrical groove


30


, and back iron


24


includes at least one semi-cylindrical groove


32


positioned such that fully seating a particular tooth


22


into a respective tooth slot


26


aligns semi-circular groove


30


with semi-circular groove


32


to form a substantially cylindrical opening


34


such that insertion of a rod (not shown) into opening


34


keys each tooth


22


to a respective tooth slot


26


. In an alternative embodiment, each back section


28


includes a slot (not shown), and back iron


24


includes at least one slot (not shown) positioned such that fully seating a particular tooth


22


into a respective tooth slot


26


aligns the back iron slot with the tooth slot such that insertion of a rectangular piece of material keys each tooth


22


to a respective tooth slot


26


. It is contemplated that the benefits of non-magnetic stator teeth accrue to all stators having non-magnetic teeth keyed thereon using any method of keying, such as, for example, dovetail keying and spline keying. In an alternative embodiment, each back section


28


is attached to a respective tooth slot


26


utilizing conventional adhesives. In a further alternative embodiment, each back section


28


is keyed and adhesively bonded to each respective tooth slot


26


. Teeth


22


are spaced to define a plurality of slots


36


that can accommodate a plurality of armature windings (not shown). Since teeth


22


are non-magnetic, utilizing stator


20


in a machine with a HTS rotor results in a low noise signature due to the reduced permeance variations that non-magnetic teeth


22


provide in comparison to a machine utilizing stator


10


. However, only half of an inner periphery


38


of stator


20


is used for torque production.





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a stator


40


including a back iron


42


and a non-magnetic tooth section


44


including a plurality of teeth


46


defining a plurality of slots


48


that can accommodate a plurality of armature windings (not shown). Teeth


46


are fabricated unitarily with a back portion


50


of tooth section


44


. Back portion


50


is substantially circular and includes at least one key


52


extending therefrom to key back portion


50


to back iron


42


utilizing a key receiving portion


54


of back iron


42


.




In an exemplary embodiment, back portion


50


is keyed and adhesively bonded to back iron


42


. In an alternative embodiment, back portion


50


includes a plurality of keys extending therefrom. In a further alternative embodiment, back iron


42


includes at least one key (not shown) and back portion


50


includes at least one key receiver portion (not shown). Since teeth


46


are non-magnetic, utilizing stator


40


in a machine with a HTS rotor results in a low noise signature due to the reduced permeance variations that non-magnetic teeth


46


provide in comparison to a machine utilizing stator


10


(shown in FIG.


1


).





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of a stator


60


including a plurality of non-magnetic teeth


62


. Stator


60


has a substantially circular outer surface


64


and an inner surface


66


including a plurality of arcuate sections


68


interspersed with a plurality of key receiving sections


70


. Each tooth


62


includes a retaining key


72


extending radially outward. In one embodiment, teeth


62


are molded with unitary keys


72


and are inserted in a machine along an axial direction by sliding each key


72


into a respective key receiving section


70


. In an alternative embodiment, teeth


62


and keys


72


are machined utilizing conventional machine tools. Since teeth


62


are non-magnetic, utilizing stator


60


in a machine with a HTS rotor results in a low noise signature due to the reduced permeance variations that non-magnetic teeth


62


provide in comparison to a machine utilizing stator


10


(shown in FIG.


1


).





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of stator


60


(shown in

FIG. 4

) during fabrication according to one embodiment. A plurality of spacers


74


are removably mounted to inner surface


66


at each arcuate section


68


forming a plurality of radially extending cavities


76


. Each cavity


76


is filled with filling material and a resin that is cured to produce rigid non-magnetic teeth


62


as shown in FIG.


4


. Key receiving sections


70


are filled with the tooth material thereby forming and installing retaining key


72


unitary with teeth


62


in receiver sections


70


in a single operation.




In an exemplary embodiment, teeth


62


include a plurality of embedded conductors forming a plurality of first armature windings. Additionally, a plurality of second armature windings are wound around teeth


62


allowing for an increased effective current density and, hence, increased torque over stators without embedded windings as explained in more detail below. Each cavity


76


is wound with conductors to form a first set of armature windings. In an exemplary embodiment, other filler material, such as, for example, but not limited to, glass fibers and polymers are added to cavities


76


either before or after forming the first windings. The filler material is selected to affect the strength, rigidity, and/or thermal conduction properties of teeth


62


. After the windings and the filler material are positioned in cavities


76


a resin is added and allowed to cure forming non-magnetic teeth


62


containing a first set of armature windings (not shown in FIG.


5


). After the resin has cured, spacers


74


are removed, and teeth


62


are wound with a second set of armature windings (not shown in FIG.


5


). Accordingly, in one embodiment, all of an inner periphery


78


of stator


60


is used to produce torque. The number of windings is increased in a stator including a first set of windings embedded in a plurality of non-magnetic teeth and a second set of windings are wound around the non-magnetic teeth resulting in a higher mean winding current density and higher torque. Although retaining key


72


is shown in the context of a dovetail key, it is contemplated that any method of keying can be utilized to obtain the benefits of winding embedded non-magnetic teeth.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of a stator


90


including a plurality of winding embedded non-magnetic teeth


92


and a plurality of second windings


94


wound around non-magnetic teeth


92


. Stator


90


is substantially similar to stator


60


shown in

FIGS. 4 and 5

, and components that are identical to components in stator


60


are identified in

FIG. 6

using the same reference numerals used in

FIGS. 4 and 5

. Stator


90


has a substantially circular outer surface


64


and an inner surface


66


including a plurality of arcuate sections


68


interspersed with a plurality of key receiving sections


70


. Each tooth


92


includes a key


72


extending radially outward and a plurality of conductors


96


forming a plurality of first windings


98


. After teeth


92


are fabricated as explained above with resin and filler, removable spacers


74


are removed, second windings


94


are wound around teeth


92


, and stator


90


is utilized in a machine to provide a higher current density than a machine without winding embedded non-magnetic teeth.




The higher current density allows for a machine with more torque than a machine without winding embedded teeth. Alternatively, the higher winding current density allows for a machine of significantly less size than a machine without winding embedded teeth. It is contemplated that the benefits of winding embedded non-magnetic teeth accrue to all types of electric machines including, for example, but not limited to, all synchronous machines, all non-synchronous machines, and direct current (DC) machines having stator windings. Additionally, the benefits accrue to inside-out or doubly-wound machines, i.e., machines with a stator at least partially mounted within a rotor bore.





FIG. 7

is cross-sectional view of a stator


110


during fabrication, stator


110


is substantially similar to stator


60


shown in

FIGS. 4 and 5

, and components that are identical to components in stator


60


are identified in

FIG. 7

using the same reference numerals used in

FIGS. 4 and 5

. Stator


110


includes a substantially circular outer surface


64


and an inner surface


66


including a plurality of key receiving sections


70


interspersed with a plurality of second key retaining sections


112


. A plurality of spacers


114


are removably mounted to inner surface


66


at each second key retaining section


112


forming a plurality of radially extending cavities


76


. In an exemplary embodiment, spacers


114


are keyed to inner surface


66


. Each cavity


76


is filled with a resin and cured to produce non-magnetic teeth, such as non-magnetic teeth


62


as shown in

FIG. 4

or conductor embedded non-magnetic teeth


92


as shown in FIG.


6


. Spacers


114


may be driven out axially to remove spacers


114


from inner surface


66


. In an alternative embodiment, spacers


114


are fabricated from a frangible material and are destroyed thereby removing spacers


114


from inner surface


66


. Key receiving sections


70


are filled with the tooth material thereby forming and installing retaining key


72


unitary with teeth


62


in receiver sections


70


in a single operation.





FIG. 8

is a cross-sectional view of stator


110


(shown in

FIG. 7

) after fabrication. Stator


110


includes a plurality of first winding embedded non-magnetic teeth


92


interspersed with a plurality of second winding embedded non-magnetic teeth


120


. Stator


110


has a substantially circular outer surface


64


and an inner surface


122


including a plurality of second winding key receiver sections


112


interspersed with a plurality of key receiving sections


70


. Each first winding embedded non-magnetic tooth


92


includes a key


72


extending radially outward and a plurality of conductors


96


forming a plurality of first windings


98


. After teeth


92


are fabricated, as explained above with resin and/or filler, removable spacers


114


are removed, second windings


94


are wound around teeth


92


, and additional resin and filler is used to fabricate second winding non-magnetic teeth


120


as explained above regarding the fabrication of first winding non-magnetic teeth


92


. Because inner surface


122


includes second winding key receiver sections


112


, fabricating second winding non-magnetic teeth


120


, forms and installs a plurality of second winding retaining keys


126


unitary with teeth


120


in a single operation. Accordingly, a substantially continuous inner tooth surface


128


is provided. Because second windings


94


are embedded in second non-magnetic teeth


120


that are keyed to stator


110


, second winding retaining keys


126


support at least a portion of the torque produced by second windings


94


and, hence, first winding non-magnetic teeth


92


do not fully support the torque produced by second windings


94


providing for a structurally sound and longer lasting winding support system, while also providing the benefits of a higher current density and lower noise.





FIG. 9

is a cross sectional view of a synchronous machine


140


including stator


20


(shown in

FIG. 2

) including a bore


142


therethrough and back iron


24


. Machine


140


further includes a housing


144


supporting a plurality of bearings


146


. A rotor shaft


148


is rotatably positioned within bearings


146


and extends through bore


142


. A field windings support member


150


is mounted on shaft


148


and supports a plurality of HTS windings


152


. A rotor jacket


154


surrounds windings


152


. Rotor jacket


154


is in flow communication with a vacuum pump


156


that maintains a pressure inside jacket


154


substantially lower than atmospheric pressure. A cryogenic cooler


158


and an exciter


160


are coupled to a first end


162


of shaft


148


. Back iron


24


is mounted to housing


144


. A plurality of armature windings


164


are mounted between non-magnetic teeth


22


that are separated from windings


152


by an air gap


166


.




During operation of machine


140


, cryogenic cooler


158


provides sufficient cooling to windings


152


allowing windings


152


to conduct as superconductors when energized. Superconducting windings


152


produce strong magnetic fields in gap


166


. The fields extend into armature windings


164


and teeth


22


, and are strongest in gap


166


. However, since teeth


22


are non-magnetic, permeance variations are reduced over a machine with stator


10


. Since permeance variations can cause noise, reducing permeance variations reduces noise. Although, an exemplary embodiment is described in the context of a synchronous machine, it is contemplated that the benefits of the invention accrue to a wide variety of rotary and linear electrical machines including, for example, but not limited to, reluctance machines, squirrel cage machines, direct current machines, and permanent magnet machines.




Utilizing a stator with non-magnetic teeth in a machine with a HTS rotor results in a low noise signature due to the reduced permeance variations that the non-magnetic teeth provide in comparison to a machine with magnetic teeth. In an exemplary embodiment, non-magnetic teeth


22


are winding embedded non-magnetic teeth resulting in a quiet and more powerful machine than an approximately equal sized machine without a stator including winding embedded non-magnetic teeth. Accordingly, an efficient and low noise machine is provided.




While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for facilitating a fabrication of a high temperature superconducting electrical machine, said method comprising the steps of:fabricating a back iron; attaching a plurality of non-magnetic teeth to the back iron wherein at least one non-magnetic tooth includes at least one embedded conductor; and installing the back iron in the machine.
  • 2. A method for fabricating a stator with non-magnetic teeth, the stator including a non-magnetic tooth back portion including a plurality of non-magnetic teeth and a back portion, the non-magnetic teeth unitary with each other and with the back portion, said method comprises the steps of:fabricating a back iron; and attaching the non-magnetic tooth back portion to the back iron, wherein the non-magnetic tooth back portion includes at least one embedded conductor.
  • 3. A method according to claim 2 wherein said step of attaching a plurality of non-magnetic teeth further comprises the step of attaching a substantially circular back portion unitary with the plurality of non-magnetic teeth to the back iron.
  • 4. A method according to claim 3 wherein said step of attaching a plurality of non-magnetic teeth further comprises the step of attaching a substantially circular back portion unitary with the plurality of non-magnetic teeth to the back iron with a key.
  • 5. A method according to claim 2 wherein said step of attaching a plurality of non-magnetic teeth further comprises the step of attaching a plurality of non-magnetic teeth comprising at least one of a carbon fiber and a fiber polymer to the iron.
  • 6. A stator comprising:a back iron; and a plurality of non-magnetic teeth unitary with a back portion, said back portion mounted on said back iron, wherein at least one said non-magnetic tooth comprises at least one embedded conductor.
  • 7. A stator according to claim 6 wherein said back portion is substantially circular.
  • 8. A stator according to claim 7 further comprising at least one key extending from said back portion.
  • 9. A stator according to claim 6 wherein said back portion is mounted on said back iron with a key.
  • 10. A stator according to claim 6 wherein said non-magnetic teeth comprise at least one of a glass laminate, a carbon fiber, and a fiber polymer.
  • 11. A dynamoelectric machine comprising:a housing; a stator comprising a bore therethrough mounted in said housing, said stator comprising a back iron and a plurality of non-magnetic teeth unitary each other and with a back portion, said back portion mounted to said back iron, wherein at least one of said non-magnetic teeth comprises at least one embedded conductor; a plurality of armature windings mounted on said teeth; and a rotor rotatably mounted in said bore, said rotor comprising a plurality of field windings.
  • 12. A machine according to claim 11 wherein said back section is substantially circular.
  • 13. A machine according to claim 11 wherein said field windings are superconducting field windings.
  • 14. A machine according to claim 13 further comprising:a rotor jacket surrounding said field windings; and a vacuum pump in flow communication with an interior of said rotor jacket.
  • 15. A machine according to claim 14 further comprising a cryogenic cooler coupled to said rotor shaft.
  • 16. A machine according to claim 11 wherein said field windings configured for synchronous operation with said armature windings.
  • 17. A machine according to claim 11 wherein said back portion keyed to said back iron.
  • 18. A machine according to claim 17 wherein said back portion adhesively bonded to said back iron.
  • 19. A machine according to claim 11 wherein said non-magnetic teeth comprise at least one of a glass laminate, a fiber polymer, and a carbon fiber.
  • 20. A stator comprising:a back iron; and a plurality of non-magnetic teeth unitary with a back portion, wherein at least one non-magnetic tooth includes at least one embedded conductor, said back portion mounted on said back iron.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/199,424, filed Apr. 25, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (23)
Number Name Date Kind
4087708 Laing May 1978 A
4179635 Beermann Dec 1979 A
4278905 Chari et al. Jul 1981 A
4330726 Albright et al. May 1982 A
4352034 Karhan et al. Sep 1982 A
4356419 Böer et al. Oct 1982 A
4375043 Roger Feb 1983 A
4380713 Roger et al. Apr 1983 A
4663551 Weh et al. May 1987 A
4695419 Inariba Sep 1987 A
4709180 Denk Nov 1987 A
4755698 Frister et al. Jul 1988 A
5013953 Odell May 1991 A
5053663 Böer et al. Oct 1991 A
5177054 Lloyd et al. Jan 1993 A
5179304 Kenjo et al. Jan 1993 A
5355743 Tesar Oct 1994 A
5482919 Joshi Jan 1996 A
5483111 Kuznetsov Jan 1996 A
5670838 Everton Sep 1997 A
5744032 Kemper Apr 1998 A
6037692 Miekka et al. Mar 2000 A
6313556 Dombrovski et al. Nov 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
2536922 Jun 1984 FR
61109435 May 1986 JP
06141531 May 1994 JP
WO 8202628 Aug 1982 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Advances In Cryogenic Engineering, vol. 27, New York, Cryogenic Engineering Conference; distributed by Plenum Press, 1960.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/199424 Apr 2000 US