The application relates generally to stators for gas turbine engines, and more particularly, to fan stators for fans of gas turbine engines.
Turbofan gas turbine engines may have disruptions in the flow through the bypass duct, such as may be caused by accessories that project into the bypass duct flow path. These accessories encounter the airflow in the bypass duct and thus form partial obstructions to the bypass airflow through the bypass duct. The obstruction of the airflow by these accessories can cause static back pressure in the bypass air flow. This static back pressure may cause vibratory stress on the upstream stationary stators of the fan, and on the fan itself.
There is accordingly provided a turbofan engine having a fan and a casing defining a bypass duct having an asymmetry in aerodynamic profile caused by a local obstruction in the bypass duct, the local obstruction in use causing an asymmetric back pressure on the fan, the engine comprising: a plurality of stator vanes circumferentially spaced-apart around a circumference of the bypass duct intermediate the fan and the local obstruction, a first group of adjacent stator vanes including a majority of the plurality of stator vanes and a second group of adjacent stator vanes including a minority of the plurality of stator vanes, the stator vanes of the first group arranged in a first circumferential sector of the bypass duct and having equal stagger angles, the stator vanes of the second group arranged in a second circumferential sector being circumferentially positioned relative to the local obstruction, the stator vanes of the second group having stagger angles different from the stagger angles of the stator vanes of the first group.
There is also provided a gas turbine engine, comprising: a radially outer fan casing and a radially inner shroud, a bypass duct being defined between the fan casing and the shroud; a fan having a hub and a plurality of fan blades extending radially outwardly from the hub, the fan blades directing air through the bypass duct during operation of the gas turbine engine; a local obstruction disposed in the bypass duct downstream of the fan blades, the local obstruction encountering the air directed through the bypass duct during operation of the gas turbine engine and generating an asymmetric back pressure on the fan; and a stator disposed intermediate the fan blades and the local obstruction, the stator having a plurality of stator vanes circumferentially spaced-apart around a circumference of the bypass duct, a first group of adjacent stator vanes including a majority of the plurality of stator vanes and a second group of adjacent stator vanes including a minority of the plurality of stator vanes, the stator vanes of the first group arranged in a first circumferential sector of the bypass duct and having equal stagger angles, the stator vanes of the second group arranged in a second circumferential sector being circumferentially positioned relative to the local obstruction, the stator vanes of the second group having stagger angles different from the stagger angles of the stator vanes of the first group.
There is further provided a method of assembling a stator for a fan of a gas turbine engine, comprising: positioning a plurality of stator vanes circumferentially spaced-apart within a bypass duct upstream of a local obstruction within the bypass duct, the local obstruction generating an asymmetric back pressure on the fan; selecting a group of the plurality of stator vanes, the stator vanes of the group including at least two circumferentially-adjacent stator vanes and less than half of the stator vanes; and providing the stator vanes of the group with stagger angles different from stagger angles of the remaining stator vanes, the stagger angles of the remaining stator vanes being equal.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
The fan 11 has a central hub with a plurality of rotatable fan blades 16. During operation of the turbofan engine 10, the fan blades 16 propel the ambient air into a bypass duct 17 defined between a radially outer fan casing 18 and a radially inner shroud 19, and also propel the ambient air into a core 20 of the turbomachinery of the turbofan engine 10. More particularly, a flow splitter 21 splits the pressurized airflow provided by the fan blades 16 into a radially inner or “core” stream channeled through the turbomachinery, and a radially outer or “bypass” stream channeled through the bypass duct 17.
One or more engine components downstream of the fan blades 16 may create one or more local obstructions 22 to the airflow in the bypass duct 17. In the depicted embodiment, the obstruction 22 is a radial fan strut. The obstruction 22 can also include other types of engine components downstream of the fan blades 16 that protrude into the bypass duct 17 and encounter the bypass airflow. Examples of such other downstream components include, but are not limited to, pylons, coolers or other heat exchangers, and an integrated drive generator (IDG). During at least some operating conditions of the engine 10, the obstruction 22 may generate a back pressure which affects components upstream of the obstruction 22. Undesirably, the back pressure generated by the obstruction 22 may cause vibratory stresses on stationary upstream components, such as a stator 30 of the fan 11, and on rotating upstream components such as the fan blades 16.
The presence of the obstruction 22 within the bypass duct 17 modifies the aerodynamic profile of the airflow through the bypass duct 17. More particularly, the obstruction 22 may introduce an asymmetry in the aerodynamic profile, such that the aerodynamic profile of the airflow about the circumference of the bypass duct 17 is not equal because of the local obstruction 22. The asymmetry in the aerodynamic profile is generally circumferentially aligned, or “clocked”, with the obstruction 22. In some instances, however, the asymmetry in the aerodynamic profile may be circumferentially offset from the obstruction 22 because of the swirl introduced into the airflow by the rotating fan blades 16.
It is also understood that in a conventional turbofan engine, the local obstruction in the bypass duct may cause an asymmetric back pressure on upstream components, such as the fan. The asymmetric back pressure is a back pressure generated by the obstruction that varies about the circumference of the bypass duct. This asymmetry in the back pressure may affect the performance of the upstream fan blades as well as the stall margin of the engine. Asymmetric back pressure may also cause dynamic excitation of the fan blades. One technique for determining the location of the asymmetric back pressure is by measuring the level of pressure variation at different circumferential points at the exit of the fan. One possible technique for determining an acceptable level of pressure variation at the exit of the fan involves defining the pressure variation in terms of a static pressure coefficient: Cp=(Pstatic−Pstatic average)/(0.5 ρV2). A significant obstruction can be one that raises the local static pressure at the fan exit by 1% relative to the average static pressure level at the fan exit. The stator 30 disclosed herein may help to mitigate the effect of unacceptable levels of pressure variation by helping to make the airflow at the fan exit more uniform about the circumference of the bypass duct.
The stator 30 of the fan 11 is mounted within the bypass duct 17 upstream of the obstruction 22 and downstream of the fan blades 16. The stator 30 has a plurality of stationary stator vanes 32 extending radially outwardly from the shroud 19 or other central hub. The stator vanes 32 extend through the bypass duct 17 between the shroud 19 and the fan casing 18 and are circumferentially spaced-apart from each other throughout the annular bypass duct 17. Each stator vane 32 may be removably inserted between the shroud 19 and the fan casing 18. More particularly, each of the shroud 19 and the fan casing 18 have circumferentially spaced-apart mounting slots 23. Each mounting slot 23 is an aperture or groove within one of the shroud 19 or fan casing 18 that is positioned and shaped to receive a correspondingly shaped hub portion or tip portion of one of the stator vanes 32 at its particular circumferential position about the stator 30.
Referring to now
The stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 are positioned relative to a circumferential location of the downstream obstruction 22. In the depicted embodiment of
In their circumferentially-offset position, the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 are generally aligned with a location of the asymmetric back pressure P caused by the local obstruction 22. During at least some operating conditions of the engine, the asymmetric back pressure P is not circumferentially aligned with the local obstruction 22. The circumferential alignment of stator vanes 32A with circumferential sectors of anticipated back pressure P helps to make the pattern of back pressure P approaching the fan blades 16 more uniform. The stator vanes 32A with their different stagger angles ⊖ helps to form additional localized areas of higher back pressure in front of the stator vanes 32A. When this localized back pressure is added to the asymmetric back pressure P pattern created by the obstruction 22, the pattern of back pressure P approaching the fan blades 16 may become more uniform, and may therefore contribute to reducing the dynamic excitation of the fan blades 16. The circumferential offset of the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 relative to the downstream bypass duct obstruction 22, as well as the different stagger angles ⊖ of the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34, may also help to reduce the static back pressure P generated by the obstruction 22 in the bypass duct 17 downstream of the fan blades 16 when they rotate in direction R.
In the embodiment of
The selection of the stator vanes 32 to form into groups 34 is based on the anticipated aerodynamic effect of the downstream obstruction 22 on upstream components. Regarding the aerodynamic stress caused to the stator 30, the downstream obstruction 22 may divert some of the air passing through the bypass duct 17 to areas through the stator 30 where there are no obstructions 22. It is believed that this additional air increases the flow velocity through the stator vanes 32 that are not circumferentially aligned with the obstruction 22, which may cause dynamic instability leading to stresses. The stator vanes 32A may therefore be included in the second group 34 so as to reduce the flow therethrough. The reduced flow caused by the staggered stator vanes 32A may help to offset this effect and reduce the dynamic stresses. The above-described technique for determining an acceptable level of pressure variation at the exit of the fan 11 may provide a threshold value of pressure variation. A pressure variation value that is determined to be above this threshold value can serve as a design factor for choosing which of the plurality stator vanes 32 to include in the second group 34.
Referring to
For the sole purpose of simplifying the explanation of the stagger angle ⊖, all the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 in
The angular misalignment of the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 relative to those outside the second group 34 is achieved by orienting the stator vanes 32A differently from the stator vanes 32. More particularly, the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 have stagger angles ⊖G that are different from the equal stagger angles ⊖R of the stator vanes 32 of the first group. Varying the stagger angles ⊖G of only those stator vanes 32A in the circumferential vicinity of the obstruction 22 helps to equalize flow around the entire circumference of the stator 30 by evening out local flow disturbances upstream of the obstruction 22. This helps to reduce the effect of the downstream obstruction 22 on the fan 11 and its components.
In contrast, some conventional fan stators vary the stagger and/or camber angle of each and every one of the stator vanes of the stator. In such stators, the stagger and camber angles vary across the full circumferential span of the stator. The magnitude of the stagger and/or camber variation between two circumferentially-adjacent stator vanes of such a stator is therefore never zero. Creating such a stator may involve providing a distinct airfoil having a unique stagger and/or camber angle for each stator vane. This is not ideal because each differently staggered and/or cambered stator vanes will have a unique part number, which increases the number of engine parts and the complexity related to tracking these parts and maintaining them. Alternatively, the stagger angle of each stator vane can be varied by machining distinct mounting slots for each stator vane. It will be appreciated that such customisation imposes high labour and financial costs for assembling the stator of the fan. Furthermore, it is observed that varying the stagger and/or camber angle of all the stator vanes is often not necessary for obstructions that generate upstream aerodynamic disturbances because these are often highly localized.
In the embodiment of
Referring to
The stagger angle ⊖G of at least one of the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 is positive, and the stagger angle ⊖G of at least another one of the stator vanes 32A of the group is negative. In the depicted embodiment, twelve stator vanes 32A make up the second group 34. The mounting slots of the outer fan casing 18 and inner shroud 19 is modified to define the stagger angles ⊖G of these twelve stator vanes 32A, while a majority of the stator vanes 32 of the total fifty-nine stator vanes 32 have the same stagger angles ⊖R that is different from the stagger angles ⊖G.
In the depicted embodiment, the magnitude of the stagger angles ⊖G is smallest for the peripheral stator vanes 32A at the circumferential periphery of the second group 34, and increases for the central stator vanes 32A that are circumferentially inwardly from the peripheral stator vanes 32A. This gradual staggering of the stator vanes 32A of the group from least staggered at the outer circumference of second group 34 to more staggered circumferentially inward therefrom eases the transition between the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 and the majority of stator vanes 32 outside the second group 34 on either side thereof.
Still referring to
Therefore, in the depicted embodiment, the twelve stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 are “open, open, open, closed, closed, closed, open, open, open, closed, closed, and closed”. For a particular stator operating within particular flow conditions, it was observed that this distribution of stagger angles ⊖G amongst the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34 helps to equalize the back pressure on the stator 30 with minimum increase in loss. It will be appreciated that the stator vanes 32 of the stator 30, and in particular the stator vanes 32A of the second group 34, can be staggered at any desired angle, depending on the flow conditions of the particular gas turbine engine being used, and depending on the specific stress distribution on the stator vanes 32 and/or the fan 11 caused by downstream obstruction 22, amongst other factors.
Still referring to
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3333794 | Manns | Aug 1967 | A |
3610262 | Wise et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3819008 | Evans et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3937590 | Mani | Feb 1976 | A |
4076454 | Wennerstrom | Feb 1978 | A |
4104002 | Ehrich | Aug 1978 | A |
4254619 | Giffin et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4354346 | Wooding | Oct 1982 | A |
4354804 | Cruzen | Oct 1982 | A |
4844692 | Minkkinen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5275531 | Roberts | Jan 1994 | A |
5365731 | Nikkanen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5474417 | Privett et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489186 | Yapp et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5607284 | Byrne et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628622 | Thore et al. | May 1997 | A |
5762470 | Gelmedov et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6139259 | Ho | Oct 2000 | A |
6179551 | Sathianathan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6227794 | Wojtyczka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6508624 | Nadeau et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514039 | Hand | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540478 | Fiala et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6655632 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7118331 | Shahpar | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7444802 | Parry | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7665964 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7797944 | Morford et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7861823 | Prasad et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7914251 | Pool et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8046915 | Xie et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8186942 | Haas | May 2012 | B2 |
8366047 | Euvino, Jr. et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403624 | Xie et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8461713 | Sammy | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8540490 | Rannakrishnan | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8636464 | Bottome | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8756909 | Avery | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9091174 | Bagnall | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20110164967 | Elorza Gomez et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120087787 | Brown | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120240594 | Shamara | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120263587 | Hergt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130045370 | Aho et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130153456 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130202424 | Lussier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266439 | Rubak et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140010638 | Perrot | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140030071 | Leslie et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140219792 | Topol | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140286768 | Boniface et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150260051 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160084162 | Abrari et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160084265 | Yu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160844162 | Abrari et al. | Mar 2016 | |
20160186690 | Florea et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160312618 | Macchia | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160312641 | Macchia | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170145840 | Di Mare et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170145959 | Baralon | May 2017 | A1 |
20170147741 | Di Mare et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170152861 | Japikse | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170248156 | Parker et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180156235 | Li et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101922312 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102012003902 | Jun 2013 | DE |
1956247 | Aug 2008 | EP |
623142 | May 1949 | GB |
2405184 | Feb 2005 | GB |
2000095195 | Apr 2000 | JP |
9809066 | Mar 1998 | WO |
0229224 | Apr 2002 | WO |
20140023891 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180156235 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |