The field of the invention is progressing cavity stators and more particularly devices that enhance adherence of the stator to its housing apart from interface adhesives.
Progressing cavity pumps (PCP) were invented in the 1930s by Moineau as seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,892,217 and 2,028,407.
A progressing cavity pump has a stator and a rotor. The stator typically comprises an elastomeric liner within a housing. The stator is open at both ends and has a multi-lobe helical passage extending through it. The rotor is normally of metal and has a helical exterior formed on it. Rotating the rotor causes fluid to pump through the stator. Progressing cavity pumps are used for a variety of purposes.
As a well pump, progressing cavity pumps may be driven by a downhole electrical motor or by a string of rods extending to a motor located at the surface. With a rod driven pump, normally the stator is suspended on a string of tubing, and the drive rods are located within the tubing. When installing a rod driven progressing cavity pump, the operator first secures the stator to the string of tubing and runs the tubing into the well to a desired depth. The operator then lowers the rotor through the tubing on the string of rods and into the stator.
To operate the pump at desired capacity, the rotor must be at the desired axial spacing within the stator and the rods must be in tension. If the lower end of the rotor is spaced above a lower end of the stator during operation, then a lower portion of the stator will not be in engagement with the rotor and the pumping capacity will suffer. The operator thus needs to know when the rotor has fully entered the stator during installation. The operator can calculate how much the rods will stretch due to the hydrostatic weight of the column of well fluid in the tubing. With the anticipated stretch distance known and with the rotor at a known initial position in the stator, the operator can pull the rods and rotor upward a distance slightly greater than the anticipated stretch, so that during operation, the rotor will move back downward to the desired axial position relative to the stator.
Stators are manufactured by insertion of a core into a tubular housing and capping the ends with the core properly positioned. The inside wall of the housing can have an adhesive coating before the material for the stator is injected through one of the end caps and forced under pressure to fill the annular space between the core and the housing inner wall. The adhesive was used in the past to help the stator body adhere to the surrounding housing. Depending on the size and the particular application, the housing could be over 10 meters long and could have an inside housing wall diameter smaller than 10 centimeters.
As the industry develops, PCPs are being deployed in progressively hotter environments to the point where the commercially available adhesives reach their temperature service limit in the order of about 150° C. In an effort to allows stators to operate effectively at higher temperatures structures have been proposed to be supported from the housing inside wall and extend inwardly such that when the stator was created within the housing a core and injected rubber around it, the end result would be a better bond to the housing inside wall than just using adhesive by itself. Along those lines U.S. Pat. No. 7,407,372 suggests a ring structure with openings that allow the rubber to pass through during manufacturing and positioned in the stator housing with L-shaped rings 18 that are welded to the stator inside wall as shown in
There are several issues with this design. In a long housing it is expensive and difficult to secure the intermediate standoff supports 18 to the housing inner wall. The more substantial the tube for structural rigidity the less rubber can be used as the stator. On the other hand if the tube is too flimsy so as to maximize the rubber content it will be structurally weaker to the point that during stator manufacturing with the core in the housing and the ring held by supports, the delivery of rubber under very high pressures to fill all the void space between the housing inner wall and the core will result in flexing of the tube to the point where it will touch the core. When the core is then removed portions of the tube extend out of the stator and damage the rotor.
Other references relating to PCP stator construction are: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,280,753; 5,318,416; 7,131,827; JP 61180512; DE 3322095; US 2009/0152009; 2009/0169404; 2002/0153141; 2009/0129937; U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,299,873; 7,201,222; 6,868,912 and 6,705,402.
What is needed and provided by the present invention is a simple way to enhance grip of the stator to its housing that is structurally sound against torsional stresses and offers in some embodiments the ability to stiffen the stator. This is accomplished with modifications to a tubular housing for the stator that can have elongated ribs extending inwardly from the housing inner wall disposed longitudinally or in a spiral array. The spiral array can have ribs spiraling all in one direction or with one or more ribs spiraling in the opposite direction forming an overlapping pattern of ribs. These ribs are formed as an integral part of the housing either by extrusion, machining, or welding such that they cannot move with respect to the housing during injection of the stator rubber or due to torsional stresses during operation. The reverse of inwardly extending ribs can also be used in the form of wall grooves in the stator housing interior wall that preferably have a bulbous region further into the wall from a narrower inlet so that a grip is created when the internal groove structure is filled with injected rubber to form the stator. These and other aspects of the present invention will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is defined by the literal and equivalent scope of the appended claims.
A reinforcing interface between the stator and its housing in a progressing cavity pump is created with ribs extending inwardly into the stator from the housing inner wall that can be longitudinally oriented or spirally oriented. Alternatively, the housing wall can be formed to have grooves into the inner wall that are made more bulbous further into the housing wall from the groove inlets so that when filled with stator material a long and continuous grip is obtained with either the wall groove embodiment or the internal rib embodiment.
Groove 18 for example has a dovetail shape with a flat groove bottom 32 and a pair of converging side walls 34 and 36 in the direction from the bottom 32 to the center of the housing 10. This shape leads to a groove inlet 38 that is considerably smaller in width than bottom 32. Still the inlet 38 cannot be overly minimized because while doing so increases resistance to pullout of the stator 12 in a radial direction, the decreased width will reduce the resistance of the stator 12 at the inlet 38 to shear force from torsional reaction forces imparted from rotation of the rotor (not shown) and the fluid moving through the stator 12.
Groove 20 is similarly configured to groove 18 except rather than an angled dovetail shape it is more bulbous and somewhat elliptical while groove 40 shows a more circular bulbous configuration with a smaller entrance 42. Groove 16 shows generically a rectangular or quadrilateral shape within the groove again with a narrower entrance 44.
While the shape of the grooves or ridges are preferably created as the housing 10 is extruded, ridges 46 can be attached after the housing tube is fabricated and welded or otherwise affixed to the interior wall 30. Alternatively, the grooves can be made separate from the extrusion process into a seamless tube wall using other techniques such as wire EDM for example.
Grooves and ridges the same or different shapes can also be combined in a single housing. The groove or ridge can extend continuously or discontinuously for the substantial length of the housing 10 with substantially meaning at least for half the length of the housing 10. When extending discontinuously the segments need not be axially or circumferentially aligned but can be offset.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1652468 | Catlin | Dec 1927 | A |
1892217 | Moineau | Dec 1932 | A |
2028407 | Moineau | Jan 1936 | A |
3139035 | O'Connor | Jun 1964 | A |
3271081 | Huddleston | Sep 1966 | A |
3280753 | Zimmer | Oct 1966 | A |
4029443 | Burnside et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
5318416 | Hantschk et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5435650 | Emig et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5474432 | Hulley et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5759019 | Wood et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5820354 | Wild et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6082980 | Papin | Jul 2000 | A |
6336796 | Cholet et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6397462 | Lanteigne et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457958 | Dunn | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6705402 | Proctor | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716008 | Kachlel | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6868912 | Proctor | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7131827 | Jager et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7192260 | Lievestro et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201222 | Kanady et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7299873 | Hartman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7314089 | Howard et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7407372 | Guidry et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20020153141 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030003000 | Shepherd et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050045332 | Howard et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050169779 | Bratu | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060131079 | Bottos | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182644 | Delpassand et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070071921 | Coulas | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080050259 | Hooper | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080122182 | Parker et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080304992 | Hooper et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090068024 | Amburgey et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090129937 | Zarowny et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152009 | Slay et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169404 | Sindt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3322095 | Dec 1984 | DE |
0844397 | May 1998 | EP |
0934464 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1095218 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2352008 | Jan 2001 | GB |
2423318 | Aug 2006 | GB |
61180512 | Aug 1986 | JP |
9745641 | Dec 1997 | WO |
02077459 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03008807 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2009031473 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110150685 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |