None.
The present invention generally relates to the field of cabinetry and more specifically to hinges for cabinetry doors.
Examples of the invention disclosed herein relate generally to hinges for mounting a substantially rectangular door for swinging between open and closed positions. In more specific examples, the invention relates to hinges for mounting what is known as an overlay door to a cabinet and defines the front opening of the cabinet. When the door is closed, the back side of the door is approximately parallel with and spaced forward from the side panels or the cabinet case.
Conventional hinges support the doors on cabinetry. The door typically remains in a closed position via use of mechanical or magnetic catches mounted on the non-hinge end of the door and a mating area of the cabinet. There remains a need for a hinge that can both support a cabinet door and keep it in a closed position without the use of additional hardware.
The general aim of examples of the present invention is to provide a new and improved door hinge which may be easily installed, easily adjusted, and will provide a closing mechanism without the use of exterior hardware. Examples of the invention also provide a hinge having a “stay-closed” feature that will withstand forces which lead to inadvertent opening of the door.
Examples of the invention also eliminate the need for time-consuming installation and adjustment of traditional magnetic or mechanical catches to hold a door in a closed position. Feature include specially configured strikes and catches incorporated into the hinge for securing a door to a cabinet frame.
The full scope of the advantages of these examples will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As shown in the drawings for purposes of illustration, an example of the invention is embodied in a hinge 10 for mounting an upright and generally rectangular door for swinging about an upright axis between open and closed positions with respect to a cabinet. Typically, the door is mounted by two or more vertically spaced hinges.
The frame wing and door wing are joined at the hinge knuckles 26. The strike 28 is shown mounted to the door wing and the catch 30 is mounted to the frame wing.
Upper and lower hinges are shown installed on a cabinet frame 32 and cabinet door 36 in
Yet another example of a strike and catch is illustrated in
As shown in the accompanying illustrations, examples of the present invention disclose a hinge device to keep a cabinet door closed without the use of non-hinge components. Use of this device will eliminate the need to use a magnetic strike and/or catch on the non-hinge end of the cabinet door and cabinet frame. This greatly reduces the time and materials to install cabinet doors. Elimination of a magnetic or mechanical catch or lock on the non-hinge end of the cabinet reduces the hardware needed and reduces the time necessary to install and align such devices to keep a cabinet door closed.
The force necessary to open a door utilizing this type of hinge is determined by the resistant force of the hinge(s) due to the strike and catch combination and the width of the door member (assuming the force is exerted at or near the end of the door). The pull force to open a typical twenty-four (24) inch wide cabinet door utilizing a standard magnetic or mechanical catch is approximately fifteen (15) lbs. The combination of strike and catch in the examples of the present invention can be adapted to accommodate a wide range of pull forces to meet the needs of the particular installation.
Although hinges of this type may be most applicable in cabinet doors, use of these hinges in other applications such as, but not limited to, lockers and closets is envisioned. As illustrated, the strike is connected to a door wing flange and the catch is connected to a frame wing flange. In another variation the strike could be connected to a frame wing flange and the catch could be connected to a door wing flange.
There are numerous varieties of strikes and catches that could be utilized with this door wing and frame wing configuration. Many types of projections or bosses could be utilized as a strike. The respective catch configuration could vary as well with one or two winged versions the most applicable. In addition, either the strike or catch or both could be adjustable to account for varying door configurations and security and/or operational requirements.
Other examples of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or practice of the invention disclosed herein. It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying, or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The scope of the invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited. Thus it is intended that the specification and examples be considered as illustrative only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
919154 | Gen | Apr 1909 | A |
1416188 | Garman | May 1922 | A |
1675791 | Carr | Jul 1928 | A |
1705820 | Lansing | Mar 1929 | A |
2526209 | Durup | Oct 1950 | A |
2571430 | Durup | Oct 1951 | A |
2577456 | Doman | Dec 1951 | A |
3036331 | Skolnik | May 1962 | A |
3061137 | Svoboda et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3107390 | Shelton | Oct 1963 | A |
3255484 | Macdonald | Jun 1966 | A |
3349429 | Suska | Oct 1967 | A |
3418683 | Stone et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3439377 | Bucholz | Apr 1969 | A |
3685094 | Goossev | Aug 1972 | A |
4063330 | Triplette | Dec 1977 | A |
5282293 | Pedoeem | Feb 1994 | A |
5355559 | Bowers et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5392493 | Youngdale | Feb 1995 | A |
5956809 | Hodgson | Sep 1999 | A |
6353966 | King | Mar 2002 | B1 |
20040034969 | Wegman | Feb 2004 | A1 |