The present application is directed to a method and system for tensioning concrete.
Prestressed Concrete
Prestressed concrete is a method for overcoming concrete's natural weakness in tension. It can be used to produce beams, floors or bridges with a longer span than is practical with ordinary reinforced concrete. Prestressing tendons (generally of high tensile steel cable or rods) are used to provide a clamping load which produces a compressive stress that balances the tensile stress that the concrete compression member would otherwise experience due to a bending load. Traditional reinforced concrete is based on the use of steel reinforcement bars, rebars, inside poured concrete. Prestressing can be accomplished in three ways: pre-tensioned concrete, and bonded or unbonded post-tensioned concrete.
Bonded Post-Tensioned Concrete
Bonded post-tensioned concrete is the descriptive term for a method of applying compression after pouring concrete and the curing process (in situ). The concrete is cast around a plastic, steel or aluminum curved duct, to follow the area where otherwise tension would occur in the concrete element. A set of tendons are fished through the duct and the concrete is poured. Once the concrete has hardened, the tendons are tensioned by hydraulic jacks that react (push) against the concrete member itself. When the tendons have stretched sufficiently, according to the design specifications (see Hooke's law), they are wedged in position and maintain tension after the jacks are removed, transferring pressure to the concrete. The duct is then grouted to protect the tendons from corrosion. This method is commonly used to create monolithic slabs for house construction in locations where expansive soils (such as adobe clay) create problems for the typical perimeter foundation. All stresses from seasonal expansion and contraction of the underlying soil are taken into the entire tensioned slab, which supports the building without significant flexure. Post-tensioning is also used in the construction of various bridges, both after concrete is cured after support by falsework and by the assembly of prefabricated sections, as in the segmental bridge. Among the advantages of this system over unbonded post-tensioning are:
The popularity of this form of prestressing for bridge construction in Europe increased significantly around the 1950s and 60s. However, a history of problems have been encountered that has cast doubt over the long-term durability of such structures.
Due to poor workmanship of quality control during construction, sometimes the ducts containing the prestressing tendons are not fully filled, leaving voids in the grout where the steel is not protected from corrosion. The situation is exacerbated if water and chloride (from de-icing salts) from the highway are able to penetrate into these voids.
Notable events are listed below:
Unbonded post-tensioned concrete differs from bonded post-tensioning by providing each individual cable permanent freedom of movement relative to the concrete. To achieve this, each individual tendon is coated with a grease (generally lithium based) and covered by a plastic sheathing formed in an extrusion process. The transfer of tension to the concrete is achieved by the steel cable acting against steel anchors embedded in the perimeter of the slab. The main disadvantage over bonded post-tensioning is the fact that a cable can destress itself and burst out of the slab if damaged (such as during repair on the slab). The advantages of this system over bonded post-tensioning are:
In one method of providing unbounded post-tensioned concrete, the holding end anchors are fastened to rebar placed above and below the cable and buried in the concrete locking that end. Rebar is placed above and below the cable both in front and behind the face of the pulling end anchor. The plastic sheathing surrounding each cable is stripped from the ends of the post-tensioning cables before placement through the pulling end anchors. After the concrete floor has been poured and has set for about a week, the cable ends will be pulled with a hydraulic jack.
Applications
Prestressed concrete is the main material for floors in high-rise buildings and the entire containment vessels of nuclear reactors.
Unbonded post-tensioning tendons are commonly used in parking garages as barrier cable. Also, due to its ability to be stressed and then de-stressed, it can be used to temporarily repair a damaged building by holding up a damaged wall or floor until permanent repairs can be made.
The advantages of prestressed concrete include crack control and lower construction costs; thinner slabs—especially important in high rise buildings in which floor thickness savings can translate into additional floors for the same (or lower) cost and fewer joints, since the distance that can be spanned by post-tensioned slabs exceeds that of reinforced constructions with the same thickness. Increasing span lengths increases the usable unencumbered floorspace in buildings; diminishing the number of joints leads to lower maintenance costs over the design life of a building, since joints are the major focus of weakness in concrete buildings.
The first prestressed concrete bridge in North America was the Walnut Lane Memorial Bridge in Philadelphia, Pa. It was completed and opened to traffic in 1951. Prestressing can also be accomplished on circular concrete pipes used for water transmission. High tensile strength steel wire is helically-wrapped around the outside of the pipe under controlled tension and spacing which induces a circumferential compressive stress in the core concrete. This enables the pipe to handle high internal pressures and the effects of external earth and traffic loads.
Design Agencies and Regulations
In the United States, pre-stressed concrete design and construction is aided by organizations such as Post-Tensioning Institute (PTI) and Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI). In Canada the Canadian Precast/prestressed concrete Institute assumes this role for both post-tensioned and pre-tensioned concrete structures.
Europe also has its own associations and institutes. It is important to note that these organizations are not the authorities of building codes or standards, but rather exist to promote the understanding and development of pre-stressed design, codes and best practices. In the UK, the Post-Tensioning Association fulfills this role.[5]
Rules for the detailing of reinforcement and prestressing tendons are provided in Section 8 of the European standard EN 1992-2:2005—Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Concrete bridges: design and detailing rules.
In Australia the code of practice used to design reinforced and prestressed concrete is AS 3600-2009.
A stay-in-place insulated concrete forming system (“T-panel system” herein) for cast-in-place concrete floors, decks, balconies and roofs is disclosed herein. The T-panel system is designed to work with any of the many ICF (Insulated Concrete Forms) building products, currently available on the market, for fabricating, e.g., walls and/or floors.
In one embodiment, insulative panels or blocks for the T-panel system are produced by the steps of: (a) molding low-cost, recycled raw EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) into a sheets, e.g., 24″ wide with a thickness of 12″, and (b) combining such EPS panels with various concrete beams and steel beams to provide a building structural member (“composite structure” herein) such as a floor, much more cost effectively than prior art comparable structures having concrete structural members. In particular, the new composite structures (and their method of fabrication) disclosed herein provides an alternative for fabricating conventional wood floors, decks and roof applications in homes, townhouses, apartment buildings and commercial structures.
In addition to the T-panel system disclosed herein keeping the cost of fabrication at or below conventional (wood frame) construction prices, the resulting composite structures exceed the insulation characteristics (R-values) found in traditional residential and commercial construction standards. Accordingly, the T-panel system disclosed herein greatly reduces energy consumption of the resulting fabricated buildings.
Embodiments disclosed herein utilize stay-in-place panels or blocks of insulative material that may be made substantially of, e.g., recycled plastic (e.g., Expanded Polystyrene (EPS)) as described hereinbelow (each such insulative panel or block herein referred to as a concrete form/insulation panel or “CFI panel”). For example, such CFI panels may have an R value 50 or more.
The system and method disclosed herein may be used to construct concrete floors, roofs, decks for commercial, industrial and residential uses. The system and method disclosed herein results in a fabricated composite structure which is a combination of an insulative material (of, e.g., a recycled plastic) and reinforced post tensioned concrete structural members, wherein the structural strength of the resulting composite structure is substantially obtained from the reinforced concrete, and wherein the insulation properties are obtain from the insulative material.
The presently disclosed T-panel system (i.e., the method for fabricating the composite structures as well as the composite structures themselves) can also be used to provide ceiling and/or roof configurations that are sloped or gabled such as for vaulted room designs.
The fabricated composite structure of the presently disclosed T-panel system also provides enhanced insulation properties via the thermal mass properties of a concrete slab (in one embodiment, such concrete being 3″ thick) combined with the attached CFI panels. In particular, such reinforced concrete structural members function to retain heat (e.g., solar heat). By using the proper ratio of thermal mass thickness to glazing (e.g., a ratio in the range of 6:1), the envelope of a building fabricated using the T-panel system will have reduced heating requirements during the cooler seasons as well as reduced air conditioning requirements during the hot seasons. In one embodiment, the thermal mass thickness of the structural members preferably may be between 2 to 4 inches for desirable daily cycles of, e.g., daytime (solar or building internal) heat absorption and heat release. Accordingly, in one preferred embodiment, a floor, ceiling, etc. fabricated according to the T-panel system may include post tensioned concrete structural members overlaid with a concrete slab approximately three inches in thickness.
In one embodiment, the concrete for the post tensioned concrete structural members (e.g., post tensioned concrete beams) is poured on top of the CFI panels and temporary support beams (e.g., composed of steel, wood or other material), wherein the temporary support beams may be received in channels or slots within the CFI panels for, e.g., supporting the composite structure until the concrete of the concrete beams are sufficiently cured (and post tensioned) for bearing the composite structure's intended loads.
In one embodiment, in order to reduce fabrication costs, the composite structural members of a composite structure may span clearly (e.g., without intermediate support when fully fabricated and cured) between support members (e.g., between two walls of a building or other structures) of lengths of 120 feet or more.
In one embodiment, the T-panel system for fabricating the composite structures described herein may use 270 Ksi (modulus of elasticity), low relaxation 7 strand steel cables (or other cabling having similar tensioning properties as described hereinbelow) for fabricating such composite structures. In particular, such cables are embedded in the one or more concrete of concrete beams for each composite structure. Such embedded cables may be tensioned via, e.g., hydraulic jacks, for increasing the load capacity and longevity of each resulting composite structure (e.g., floor or ceiling). A novel arrangement of such cables within the concrete, in combination with appropriate cable tensioning, results in unexpected strength for the volume of concrete used in fabricating such composite structures. More particularly, although the concrete for a composite structure may be poured so as to form a resulting load support surface (having an area of, e.g., a 1,000 square feet or more, this surface being orthogonal to the composite structure's thickness), the concrete provided within the composite structure includes a plurality of concrete beams in which at least some of the cables are embedded so that such concrete beams can be post tensioned along their lengths in a manner causes the composite structure to resiliently resist degradation (e.g., cracking) when supporting loads of substantial weight. Thus, a composite structure according to the present disclosure may include only a few inches thickness of concrete (e.g., in the range of 10 to 20 inches, and in some embodiments in the narrower range of 10 to 16 inches), but have the capacity to withstand or support loads typically requiring reinforced concrete of at least twice in thickness.
Each such composite structure includes (i) a first collection of (generally parallel) concrete “T” beams that are poured in-situ prior to pouring the load support surface, and, (ii) depending on, e.g., the dimensions of the load support surface, a second collection of one or more concrete beams is also included in the composite structure, wherein the second collection is also poured in-situ prior to pouring the load support surface. The second collection of one or more beams may be transverse or orthogonally oriented to the first plurality of concrete T beams. Moreover, the cables within the first and second collections of concrete beams may be separately post tensioned according to a predetermined protocol to thereby enhance the strength and durability of the composite structure.
The cables (also referred to as “tendons” in the art) within the first and second collections of concrete beams are tensioned during concrete curing to induce an upward or lifting bias, toward the load support surface. In particular, prior to concrete pouring for such beams, the cables are positioned within beam forms or recesses provided by the CFI panels so that the cables have, e.g., parabolic shapes induced by gravity within such forms or recesses. Thus, after the in-situ pouring and at least partial curing of the concrete, the post tensioning of the cables induce pressures or forces within the beams that resist (downwardly directed) loads placed on the support surface, and in particular, substantially reduces or prevents concrete failure and/or cracking. Thus, when the composite structure's load support surface is provided as, e.g., a floor or ceiling of a building, such beam internal cable pressures, or upwardly directed forces, increase the load capacity of the load support surface. Moreover, where the cables of the first collection of beams traverse the cable(s) of the second collection of beams, the cables of the first collection are spaced apart from the cable(s) of the second collection such that the cables of the first collection are supported in positions further toward the load support surface than the cable(s) of the second collection. Thus, although each cable of the first collection of beams may be configured (prior to concrete pouring) so that it hangs unsupported (i.e., parabolically) in each of one or more CFI panel forms or recesses, where such cables cross each cable, C, for the second collection of beams, each cable (for the first collection of beams) may be supported (prior to concrete pouring) a predetermined distance above (e.g., further toward the support surface than) the (parabolically hanging) cable C. Accordingly, at each such crossing of cables, there will be a predetermined extent of concrete provided between the crossed cables along the thickness of the composite structure. Thus, upon tensioning of the cables (for both the first and second collections of beams), the concrete between (and in proximity to) each such cable crossing is compressed by the cables of the crossing. Since the thickness of the concrete at each such cable crossing may include most of the thickness of each of the corresponding beams (one from the first collection and one from the second collection), such concrete is highly compressed thereby becoming what may be referred to as ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) having, e.g., a compression strength in that may be in excess of 150 megapascals (MPa=N/mm2), up to and possibly exceeding 250 MPa. Accordingly, such highly compressed concrete provided in both the first and second collections of beams substantially increases the load supporting capability of the composite structure's load support surface thereby substantially mitigating engineering failure issues like high fatigue strength that can occur in concrete load floors and ceilings.
In one embodiment, instead of steel cables (and corresponding steel post tensioning anchors), carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) cables or tendons may be used in combination with nonmetallic anchors for post-tensioning the CFRP cables thereby providing a completely metal-free (non-corroding) post-tensioning of the composite structures. As with conventional steel anchors, the non-metallic anchors hold the CFRP cables through mechanical gripping but without the corrugations between wedges and the CFRP cables as one skilled in the art will understand. Each such nonmetallic anchor may include an outer barrel with a conical bore and four wedges. The nonmetallic anchor components may be made of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), and the barrel may be wrapped with CFRP sheets to provide the confinement required to utilize the strength and toughness of UHPC fully. The concrete compressed via the CFRP post-tensioning may have compressive strengths in excess of 200 MPa together with excellent durability and fracture toughness.
In one embodiment, one to five millimeter (preferably three millimeter) chopped carbon fibers may be incorporated into the concrete of the composite structures to enhance its fracture toughness or resistance.
In addition, the T-panel system disclosed herein allows for an almost unchanged load distribution and serviceability even after considerable overload, since temporary concrete cracks close again after the overload has been removed from the load support surface. As already mentioned above, the T-panel system allows for much larger spans and reduced thickness, the latter resulting in reduced dead load, which also has a beneficial effect upon other structural members of a building having such composite structures, wherein the other structural members may be, e.g., bearing walls, columns, foundations. Additionally, by utilizing the composite structures, there may be a reduction in the overall height of a building, or alternatively, additional floors to be incorporated in a building of a given height.
Moreover, under a permanent load (e.g., on the load support surface), a composite structure provided by the T-panel system disclosed herein allows for a well-above-average structural behavior regarding deflections and cracking. For example, such a composite structure provides a much higher punching shear strength due to the lifting forces distributed within the composite structure by distributed crossings of the post tensioned cables within composite structure.
The cost in fabrication of the composite structures disclosed herein is substantially reduced for the loads (e.g., equipment, snow, interior furnishings, etc.) that can be effectively and reliably supported when compared to alternative floor or ceiling methods of fabrication. In particular, for an engineered load capacity, the composite structures can be fabricated using, e.g., a reduced quantity of concrete and steel. For example, this is due (at least in part)), to the reduced amplitude of stress changes in the composite structure when exposed to varying loads. Said another way, the composite structure's load support surface deflects a reduced amount for a given load being supported as compared with alternative construction systems.
Further benefits of the T-panel system are numerous, and in particular, the following benefits are provided.
Moreover, since the composite structures have increased strength and resistance to load failure, reduced materials for fabrication (to obtain corresponding strength and resistance to failure) as well as reduced fabrication labor, military and emergency preparedness applications can be much better addressed by the T-panel than prior art construction techniques. For example, the U.S. military and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) have devoted considerable effort to assisting in the development and deployment of cost effective dwellings. However, such dwellings typically have a reduced ability to withstand intense and/or very high stress loads (e.g., explosions, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, artillery fire, certain rock slides, etc.). Accordingly, the use of the composite structures disclosed herein for constructing more permanent and/or durable dwelling structures, can be an additional or alternative dwelling construction technique, e.g., particularly in hazardous and/or extended stay conditions.
A further benefit of the composite structures is their energy efficiency. In particular, the composite structures may have a nominal insulation value of R-50 or higher, depending on the thickness of, e.g., the CFI panels, the concrete slab, and the finish flooring provided.
In one embodiment, heat storage/release components/equipment may be integrated into the composite structures. In particular, heat storage and/or release conduits can be distributed within the concrete slab (and/or the corresponding concrete T beams or transverse beams described herein) without affecting the load bearing capacity of the resulting composite structures.
In one embodiment, when the composite structures disclosed herein are combined with concrete sandwich walls (ICF), a building envelope may be constructed that is exceptionally energy efficient. Moreover, by also utilizing photovoltaic panels and other forms of renewable energy such as wind energy, geothermal, and hot water solar panels, a building constructed using the composite structures may be substantially self sufficient requiring little energy from commercial sources such as electrical utility companies.
In order to provide a more full disclosure of the T-panel system and the composite structure fabricated therefrom, the following U.S. Patents are fully incorporated herein by reference:
Referring particularly to
Opening from the base 58 of one embodiment of the CFI panels 54 is at least one (and preferably a plurality) panel support openings 80 (
During fabrication of the composite structure 50, the CFI panels 54 are positioned (and interlocked with one another) on supports 84, wherein such supports are inserted into the openings 80 as shown in
If the desired span for a composite structure 50 is, for example, 60 feet, a concrete post-tensioned transverse beam 88 may be required at the 30 feet span location (see
It is worth noting that in one embodiment described further below, the pouring of the beams 76 and 88 are performed in a first pouring step, and subsequently a second pouring step is performed for pouring the concrete upper slab 90 having load support surface 91 upon which the primary loads are designed to be experienced by the composite structure 50.
Once the concrete for the T beams 76 and (if provided) traverse beam(s) 88 (
For securing the CFI panels 54 together to form rows (e.g., rows #1 and #2 of
The composite structure 50 also includes at least one cable or tendon 110 positioned in each of the recesses 70 for post tensioning the concrete of the T beams 76, and, if provided, at least one cable or tendon 114 positioned in each channel 91 for post tensioning the concrete of the transverse beam(s) 88. Each of the cables 110 and 114 may be a 270 Ksi 7 strand steel cable of low relaxation. Other types of cables may be used including nonmetallic cables of, e.g., carbon fiber, and 9 strand steel cables. However, such cables 110 ad 114 must be able to be tensioned with, e.g., hydraulic jacks after the cables are embedded in partially cured concrete. In particular, such cables are post tensioned after the concrete reaches a predetermined minimum strength of, e.g., 3,000 psi. Such cables 110 and 114 may be configured or positioned in various predetermined arrangements for enhancing the structural properties of the resulting composite structure 50 (e.g., as shown in
If each such cable 110 and 114 comprises a non-corrosion resist material (e.g., steel), then the cable may be provided in a thick plastic sheathing and/or tubing (labeled “118” in
Regarding the cables 110, such cables may be configured and placed in the recesses 70 so that these cables conform to one or more parabolic shapes induced by gravity within the recesses 70 as shown in
In one embodiment, the T-beams may be spaced at 2′-0″ on center, in an arrangement that induces a lifting to a floor (provided by one or more of the composite structures 50 in those areas where cracked moment capacities become very critical. In particular, such lifting of such floors are a technical and economical advantages of the T-panel system disclosed herein.
In one embodiment, the CFI panels 54 may have a dual purpose for the composite structure in that once the concrete therein is properly cured, the CFI panels may also act as integral furring strips to which interior living space finishes, such as drywall can be attached.
The T-panel system is based on at least two different approaches or methods for fabricating the composite structures 50. The method utilized for the design and fabrication of the T beams 76 is based on the theory of the elasticity of the concrete material therein, while method utilized for the design and fabrication of the traverse beams 88 is preferably based on the theory of the plasticity of the concrete material therein.
The approach or method for the design and fabrication of the T beams 76 may be based on the T beams 76 being designed to take into consideration the calculation of each individual T beam moment and the shear forces that would be generated when a maximum load is applied on the load support surface 91 of the composite structure 50 containing the T beams. In other words, moments and shear forces resulting from applied loads on the load support surface 91 are calculated according to the elastic theory of concrete for each individual T beam 76 (taking into account the cable 110 therein and its related tensioning and pre-stressed forces or internal pressures within the T beam as one skilled in the art will understand). Although, in the equation, the pre-stressed tensioning of a cable 110 is not considered as an applied load. It should be taken into account in the determination of the ultimate strength of the T beam. No moments and shear forces due to pre-stress and therefore also no secondary moments should be calculated. This applies only for the first main section. The moments and shear forces due to applied loads multiplied by the load factor must be smaller at every section than the ultimate strength divided by the cross-section factor. The ultimate limit state condition to be met may therefore be expressed in the following formula:
S×γf≤R/γm
where S represents the shear forces, γf the gamma load factor, R the ultimate strength and γm the cross section factor.
Regarding the traverse beams 88, the loading calculation, the forces resulting from the curvature of the pre-stressed cables 114 in each transverse beam 88, must be treated at all times as an applied load to the T beams 76. This is necessary for determining the maximum T beam 76 load calculations and in determining the secondary moments for the T beams, and therefore for determining the load calculation for the corresponding composite structure 50. The innovative consideration of the placement of a transverse structural component and its related upper tensioning and forces, results in a very balanced load diagram throughout the structure and also keeps all the deflections in a very low range and within the limits allowed by the plasticity of the concrete material.
Regarding the transversal beam, as explained above, a theory of plasticity is being utilized for the calculation and the design of the structural component. The following explanations show how its application is best suitable for the design of this specific and secondary transversal structural component: The condition to be fulfilled at failure here is the following:
[(g+q)u/g]+q≥γ
where γ=γf×γm.
The ultimate design loading (g+q)u divided by the service loading (g+q) must correspond to a value at least equal to the safety factor γ. The most accurate method of determining the ultimate design loading (g+q)u is by utilizing a kinematic approach, which provides an upper boundary for the ultimate load scenario. The mechanism that has been chosen is the one that leads to the lowest load.
Furthermore, in one embodiment, substantially any type of interior finish can be mechanically attached to the steel beams provided as part of each such composite structural member. In particular, such steel beams may function as furring strips when, e.g., self-tapping screws are used to attach interior finish panels such as sheet rock or dry wall to the temporary supports 84 (e.g., steel beams). For example, each sheet may be attached to a plurality of the steel beams embedded within the composite structural members. These connection mechanisms are an integral part of the “T” panel system disclosed herein, with a spacing of 12 inches on center. On the top side of the panels, the concrete upper slab 90 with any type of appropriate finish available, from stained concrete products, acids, paint, tile, hardwood, carpet, etc.
In one embodiment (and as described also hereinabove), the interlocking CFI panels 54 may interlock with each other, e.g., via a tongue-and-groove design or other interlocking techniques (see cross-section in
In at least one embodiment, the T-beams 76 of a composite structure 50 may measure 3″ at the bottom and 12″ high Such T beams 76 may be spaced at 24″ on center and may be reinforced within the structural members via high strength tendons, tensioned with appropriate hydraulic jacks after the appropriate concrete curing. In particular, such tendons may have the following characteristics: 7-wire cable or tendon extruded in a minimum of 1 mm of plastic sheathing, with a cross sectional area of steel of 0.153 square inches, and a modulus of elasticity (E)=28,500,000 lbs/in2.
In addition, each composite structure 50 may also include rebar as one skilled in the art will understand.
Utilities are easier to install with the T-panel system described herein. The interlocking CFI panels 54 can be easily removed (and/or channels carved therein) in those locations that require utility runs. Cutting interlocking CFI panels 54 is accomplished using common hand tools, such as saws or “hot knifes”. This does not adversely affect the R-Value or structural integrity of the system.
The temporary supports 84 can be an integral part of the composite structure 50. The temporary supports 84 may be located approximately every six to eight feet on center. An installer is responsible for the design and correct installation of the system in accordance with the ACI (American Concrete Institute) 347-04 “Guide to Formwork for Concrete” or current applicable codes. Any variance from those standards must be provided and certified in advance by a Structural Engineer, licensed for the job site location and specifications.
One embodiment for constructing each floor (e.g., of a multi-story building) via the composite structural members may be described as follows.
The above embodiments of the composite structures 50 may, in some embodiments, include other cable 110 and 114 arrangements. For example, instead of the cables 114 being positioned below the cables 110, at least one cable 110 may be positioned in the shape of a single parabolic arc between its end points so that this cable 110 transverses underneath each of the one or more cables 114. In this embodiment, the at least one cable 110 also provides only upwardly directed tension on the concrete to resist loads placed on the load support surface 91. In one embodiment (e.g., as shown in
In one embodiment, one or more of the cables 110 and/or 114 may be threaded into eyes 204 of one or more load distributers 208 (
In one embodiment, the one or more cables 110 and/or 114 may include components 230 thereon (
In one embodiment, the cables 110 and 114 may be substantially straight but not highly tensioned as the concrete is poured, wherein the cables 110 and 114 are spaced apart at their crossings by, e.g., about at least 2 to 3 inches. In one embodiment, the cables 110 are diagonally positioned across the length of the composite structure, wherein such cables alternate in their diagonal orientation such that, e.g., a first cable 110 extends upwardly (e.g., from a first end of the length of the composite structure 50 to the second end) and the adjacent cable(s) 110 extend downwardly from the first end of the length of the composite structure 50 to the second end. In one embodiment, the cables 114 may be substantially horizontal with the load support surface 91. Thus, the cables 110 and 114 may be woven together across both the width and length of the composite structure 50. In another embodiment, such diagonalization of cables can be provided to configure the cables 114 instead of or in addition to the cables 110.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. Further, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Consequently, variation and modification commiserate with the above teachings, within the skill and knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present invention. The embodiment described hereinabove is further intended to explain the best mode presently known of practicing the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention as such, or in other embodiments, and with the various modifications required by their particular application or uses of the invention.
The present application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/479,248, filed Apr. 4, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/583,615, filed Dec. 27, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,611,645, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/844,791, filed Mar. 16, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,919,057, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/652,316, filed May 28, 2012; all of the above-identified applications being fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2299670 | Westcott | Oct 1942 | A |
3137971 | Rhodes | Jun 1964 | A |
3214034 | Cheek | Oct 1965 | A |
3237357 | Hutchings | Mar 1966 | A |
3540359 | Swisher, Jr. et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3693310 | Middleton | Sep 1972 | A |
3944242 | Eubank | Mar 1976 | A |
4166347 | Pohlman et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4574545 | Reigstad et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4911582 | Peirce, Jr. et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4942364 | Nishijima et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5025605 | Sekijima et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5365779 | VanderVelde | Nov 1994 | A |
6119417 | Valverde et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6311564 | Martin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321657 | Owen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6471299 | Brooks et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6729093 | Zambelli | May 2004 | B2 |
6832454 | Iyer | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7038470 | Johnson | May 2006 | B1 |
7339489 | Arita et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7551058 | Johnson | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7596915 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7637166 | Hecht et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8020235 | Grace | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8091432 | Hecht et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109691 | Clark | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8919057 | Dupray | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9159271 | Tohyama | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9611645 | Dupray | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9784627 | Saito et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
1009411 | Dupray | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20040130063 | Ohta | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040206032 | Messenger et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060117833 | Kanare | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060201100 | Langwadt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218870 | Messenger | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230696 | Sarkkinen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070046479 | Hines | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058898 | Slade et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126433 | Theophanous | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080121151 | Hallissy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100095603 | DeFilipp | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100199972 | Brost | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100315076 | Tsukada et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110138549 | He | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110277547 | Duncan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120204978 | Ozamiz Fortis | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130140509 | Domage | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154441 | Redmond | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150146760 | Huang et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150246614 | Dames et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150276233 | Berchtold | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150285522 | Berchtold | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150308697 | Berchtold | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20180136085 | Lochry | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0297006 | May 1992 | EP |
943852 | Dec 1963 | GB |
1260176 | Jan 1972 | GB |
Entry |
---|
AmDeck™ Technical & Installation Manual: amvic building system, Revision 1.00, Amvic, Inc., 2007, 103 pages. |
Amvic Technical Manual, Revision 1.0, Amvic, Inc., Mar. 2006, 222 pages. |
Estimating Guide for INSUL-DECK and Plastbau Technology, INSUL-DECK LLC, 2003, 40 pages. |
Grace et al., “Full-Scale Test of Prestressed Double-Tee Beam,” Concrete International, Apr. 2003, pp. 52-58. |
Grace, “Strengthening of Negative Moment Region of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strips,” ACI Structural Journal, May-Jun. 2001, Title No. 98-X33, pp. 347-358. |
LITE-DECK Concrete Roofs/Floors/Walls: Technical Evaluation Manual, Nov. 2008, 46 pages. |
Prestressed Concrete, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed May 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
PTData for Windows, Post-Tensioning Design and Analysis Program, Theory Manual, Structural Data Incorporated, 2000, 143 pages. |
Stevenson et al., “Post-Tensioned Concrete Walls and Frames for Seismic-Resistance—A Case Study of the David Brower Center,” SEAOC 2008 Convention Proceedings, 2008, pp. 1-8. |
Website for Belfast Valley Contractors, http://www.belfastvalley.com/services/index.html, accessed May 19, 2012, 4 pages. |
Website for LiteForm Technologies, http://www.liteform.com/Lite_Deck/information.html, accessed May 19, 2012, 2 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,791, dated Oct. 22, 2013. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,791, dated May 1, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,791, dated Aug. 20, 2014. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/583,615, dated Jul. 28, 2015. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/583,615, dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/583,615, dated Jul. 28, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/583,615, dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/479,248, dated Jul. 21, 2017. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/479,248, dated May 30, 2018. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/479,248, dated Jun. 6, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61652316 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13844791 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14583615 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15479248 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 16154561 | US | |
Parent | 14583615 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15479248 | US |