This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2007/050081, filed Jan. 4, 2007 and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of European application No. 06000183.1 filed Jan. 5, 2006, both of the applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The invention relates to a steam circuit in a power station comprising at least one steam generator and at least one overheater.
Steam circuits of this type are known from steam power stations and combined gas and steam power stations, where the thermal energy from steam is converted into kinetic energy in a steam turbine. The steam required to drive the steam turbine is generated in a steam generator from previously purified and desalinated water and overheated in an overheater. The steam is fed from the overheater to the steam turbine, where it releases part of its previously collected thermal energy to the turbine in the form of kinetic energy. A generator is connected to the turbine, which generator transforms the movement of the turbine into electric energy. After flowing through the steam turbine, the decompressed and cooled steam is directed into a condenser, where it cools further by emitting heat and collects in liquid form as water in the so-called hot well. From there the water is pumped via appropriate pumps into a feed water tank and held in reserve there. Finally the condensate is returned to the steam generator via a feed pump. The steam generator itself can be heated using conventional fuels, such as, for example, oil, gas or coal, but can also be heated using nuclear power.
During the operation of the steam circuit, impurities enter into the water used in the circuit, and with time these impurities can result in damage to the steam circuit components. Accordingly, it is necessary to ensure that the chemical, the chemical composition of the circuit medium (water, steam) remains within certain limits. In the case of boilers with cylindrical boiler shells (natural or forced circulation), this is achieved, for example, by water from the drum being blown down constantly or at intervals. In addition, during the starting up and shutting down procedures, water accumulates at the overheater heating surfaces. This water is removed as waste water and must be replaced by treated water (demineralized water). For economical reasons, it is desirable to reduce the proportion of waste water produced and to increase the proportion of reused process waste water. However this is offset by the very high costs involved in the building of the power station, so that with respect to the economic efficiency of the power station as a whole, with the previously known technical options minimizing the waste water arising was not as a rule a good idea. Therefore, in most cases, the steam circuit process waste water produced is just collected and subsequently all thrown away, thus ultimately routed into a waste water system. In most cases, the waste water must undergo a predetermined treatment in accordance with statutory regulations.
In the future, due to a foreseeable further tightening of the terms of environmental protection one can assume that a reduction in the amount of waste water will be enforced by law or that the output of waste water, including conditioning will be made so expensive that a reduction of the amount of waste water will make good economic sense.
In a steam circuit the waste water produced is generally divided into two groups. Draining in the steam area of the steam circuit, such as, for example, draining of the overheater, delivers “clean” waste water, i.e., the chemical composition of the waste water allows it to be reused straight away in the steam circuit. Draining in the water area of the steam circuit, such as, for example, the emergency blow down on the cylindrical boiler shell, produces, in contrast “contaminated” waste water, which means that the chemical composition of the waste water does not permit it to be reused straight away in the steam circuit. The purity of the waste water from the draining in the steam area is based on the fact that during the separation in the steam generator in water and steam phase any impurities in the water phase remain and the steam that leaves the steam generator is clean.
If one is able to collect the clean waste water separately, so that it becomes possible to feed it back into the steam circuit again, then in addition to a reduction of up to 60% in the amount of waste water produced and the expenses related to that, one also saves the corresponding expenses related to the generation and subsequent conditioning of demineralized water that had to replace the discarded water in the circuit.
The greatest proportion of clean waste water occurs at the overheater when starting up and especially when shutting down the power station. This fact makes use of a known concept for minimizing waste water in a steam circuit, wherein the overheater drain lines lead to a separate collector tank. Using a pump the condensate is then pumped from the collector tank into a condensate collector tank and from then on to the condenser of the steam circuit. The known concept is described in more detail below with reference to
It is an object of the present invention to create an alternative steam circuit in a power station.
According to the present invention, the object is achieved using a steam circuit according to the claims. The dependent claims relate to individual embodiments of the steam circuit according to the invention.
The steam circuit according to the present invention comprises at least one steam generator and at least one overheater. According to the invention a condensate collector and return line including small-capacity pumps is provided between the overheater and the steam generator to trap condensate in the overheater and return the condensate to the evaporator. The corresponding drain lines from the steam area, which are situated in front of the boiler slide valve are connected into this condensate collector and return line. This condensate collector and return line is constantly under pressure, as at least one, advantageously all drain lines are directly connected to it, i.e. motorized flow control devices are not used. In contrast to prior art, the condensate that may gather in the overheater is thus not pumped to the condenser via a collector tank and a condensate collector tank and from there returned to the actual steam circuit of the power station, but the condensate is just collected in a condensate collector and return line and returned directly to the evaporator. In addition to the motorized flow control devices one also does not have to have the collector tank(s) including associated secondary components, such as, for example, pumps, heat exchangers, connecting pipe work etc. Preferably a surge tank is provided between the drain line and the condensate collector and return line, in order to minimize any transverse flows. Further, the diameter of an overheater pipe should be greater than the diameter of the drain line. If applicable it is also possible for several drain lines with a smaller diameter to lead to the condensate collector and return line. This serves to minimize those transverse flows that could occur despite the surge tank. In order to control any transverse flows that may arise due to different pressure at the individual drainage points, in addition the drain lines installed where the pressure is lower should be designed with a greater diameter than the drain lines installed where the pressure is higher. It would also be possible to route each of the individual drain lines—apart from one drain line, via which a constant open connection is ensured so that the condensate collector and return line is always under pressure—via a motorized valve in the condensate collector and return line, instead of directly to the condensate collector line. However, this alternative would be more cost intensive.
One pump is advantageously functionally-connected to the condensate collector and return line, and with the help of said pump the condensate collected in the condensate collector and return line of the overheater can be pumped back into the steam generator. Preferably the operation of the pump can be regulated by the amount of condensate present in the condensate collector and return line. For example if a 2-point level detection device is provided, which detects an upper and a lower condensate level limit in the condensate collector line. When the upper level is reached the pump is operated to pump the condensate out of the condensate collector and return line into the evaporator. If the lower level is reached then accordingly the pump is switched off so as not to pump any more condensate into the steam generator. If the condensate reaches the upper limit level of the condensate collector line without the pump operation starting, then this is an indication that the pump and/or the control is faulty. For such an event the condensate collector line preferably includes an outlet line provided with an emergency valve, which outlet line branches off from the condensate collector and return line, wherein the outlet line is connected to a waste water tank. In this way, the condensate collector and return line can be emptied provisionally in the event of the pump or pump control system failing.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, the condensate collector and return line comprise at least one flow control device, even better two flow control devices, which are provided one upstream and one downstream of the pump. Accordingly maintenance and repair work can be undertaken on the pump while the steam circuit is operating.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention at least one drain line is arranged between the overheater and the condensate collector line, which drain line connects the overheater with the condensate collector line. Preferably a surge tank is provided between the drain line and the condensate collector line, in order to minimize any transverse flows that may occur. Further the diameter of an overheater pipe from which the drain line branches off should be greater than the diameter of the drain line. If applicable it is also possible for several drain lines with a smaller diameter to lead to the condensate collector line. This serves to minimize those transverse flows that could occur despite the surge tank. In order to control any transverse flows that may arise due to different pressure at the individual drainage points, in addition the drain lines installed where the pressure is lower should be designed with a greater diameter than the drain lines installed where the pressure is higher. It would also be possible to route each of the individual drain lines—apart from one drain line, via which a constant open connection is ensured so that the condensate collector and return line is always under pressure—via a motorized valve in the condensate collector and return line, instead of directly to the condensate collector line. However, this alternative would be more cost intensive.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, the evaporator for removing the condensate present in it via additional drain lines can also preferably connect to the condensate collector and return line, whereby an outlet line provided with a valve branches off from the condensate collector and return line, and is connected to a waste water collecting tank. Correspondingly the water present in the evaporator can also be drained via the inventive condensate collector line into the waste water tank. This has the advantage that the waste water tank does not need to be installed in a correspondingly large pit (for the increase in the geodetic height), but can be placed at ground level.
The invention is described in more detail below with reference to the drawing, in which;
The same reference numbers refer below to similar components.
In order when draining the steam circuit 10 to separate the “clean” waste water in the steam area of the steam circuit 10, that is to say the waste water that can be reused directly in the steam circuit 10, from the “contaminated” waste water in the water area of the steam circuit 10, which water is not suitable for direct reuse in the steam circuit 10 without being treated beforehand, the steam circuit 10 contains a special drainage system, which will be described in detail below.
In order to drain the lines 30, 32 and 34, in which there is steam at the time of a shut down of the power station, drain lines 46, 48 and 50 are provided to convey the condensate present in the lines 30, 32 and 34 into a collecting tank 52, in which the remaining residual steam is condensed. The condensate accumulated in the overheaters 24, 26 and 28 is conveyed via drain lines 54, 56 and 58 into a further collecting tank 60, in which the remaining steam is also condensed. The tanks 52 and 60 are connected to the condenser. Because of the corresponding low pressure, the incoming condensate will partly vaporize and reach the condenser 40 via the connecting line 61. The residual condensate collected in the collecting tanks 52 and 60 is pumped via lines 62 and 64 by means of pumps 66 and 68 into a condensate collecting tank 70 and stored there. If need be, the condensate stored in the condensate collecting tank 70 can then be routed again via a line 72 to the condenser 40 and in this way to the actual steam circuit. The separation of the clean waste water and feeding back into the steam circuit 10 enables the amount of waste water produced to be reduced by up to 60%, which saves on costs in the long-term. In addition, because of the reduction in the amount of waste water produced, expenditure related to the generation and later treatment of demineralized water is reduced.
The “contaminated” waste water in the water area of the steam circuit 10 shown in
One disadvantage of the steam circuit 10 shown in
The corresponding drain lines 112, 114 and 116 branch off from the overheaters 24, 26 and 28. Said drain lines each flow into a condensate collector and return line, which is explained in more detail with reference to
The more detailed design of an overheater and steam generator drainage system is shown schematically in
If the condensate level 156 reaches the maximum level 158, which is detected by the level detection device (not shown), the pump 166 is switched on, whereby the valves 164 and 168 are open and the valve 170 is closed. In this way, the condensate collected in the condensate collector and return line 146 is pumped back into the evaporator 12. If the level detection device detects that the condensate level 156 has reached the minimum level 160, then the pump 166 is stopped, so that no further condensate is conveyed from the condensate collector and return line 146 via the lines 162 and 118 into the evaporator 12. This scenario is repeated as soon as the maximum level 158 is reached again. If the condensate level 156 reaches the maximum level 158 without the pump 166 starting up, then an alarm is triggered as there must be a fault in the pump 166 or the pump control system. If the pump 166 is faulty then the valve 170 of the line 156 can be opened and the condensate drained into the waste water collecting tank 80.
For the purpose of draining the evaporator 12, the evaporator 12 and the condensate collector and return line 146 are connected to each other via the drain line 130, wherein the drain line 130 has a valve 172. If the condensate contained in the evaporator 12 is emptied then the valve 168 of the return line 118 is closed and the valve 170 of the line 136 and also the valve 172 of the drain line 130 are opened. Thus using the pump 166, the pressurized condensate contained in the evaporator 112 can flow via the drain line 130, the condensate collector line 146 and the line 136 to the waste water collecting tank 80.
The valves 164, 170 and 168 can be closed for ease of maintenance or trouble free repair on work pump 166.
The draining system shown in
An essential advantage of the above described draining systems for the overheaters 24, 26 and 28 and the evaporators 12, 14 and 16 lies in the simplicity of its design. Furthermore, in comparison with the steam circuit 10 shown in
It should be clear that the present invention is not restricted to the above described exemplary embodiment. Rather, modifications and changes are possible without going beyond the scope of protection as defined by the attached claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06000183 | Jan 2006 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/050081 | 1/4/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/18/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/077248 | 7/12/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2321390 | Juzi | Jun 1943 | A |
3478726 | Kikinis | Nov 1969 | A |
4031404 | Martz et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4241701 | Morse | Dec 1980 | A |
4408460 | Paquet | Oct 1983 | A |
5333677 | Molivadas | Aug 1994 | A |
6237542 | Nakajo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237543 | Charoton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301895 | Kallina et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6920760 | Schottler et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20040011019 | Schottler et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050034445 | Radovich | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20090178403 | Juretzek | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 526 523 | Nov 1983 | FR |
788704 | Jan 1958 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Michael Pearson; Robert W. Anderson; “Questions about condensate quenching, prestart purging”; Power; Jul. 2000; pp. 41-42, 44; vol. 144, No. 4; XP000954502; McGraw-Hill Company, New York, NY, US. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090165460 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |