The present invention relates to a steam generating slurry gasifier which produces steam and synthesis gas from an aqueous carbonaceous feed slurry. Further, the invention relates to processes for preparation gaseous products, and in particular, methane via the catalytic gasification of carbonaceous feedstocks in the presence of steam and synthesis gas generated by the slurry gasifier.
In view of numerous factors such as higher energy prices and environmental concerns, the production of value-added gaseous products from lower-fuel-value carbonaceous feedstocks, such as petroleum coke and coal, is receiving renewed attention. The catalytic gasification of such materials to produce methane and other value-added gases is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,828,474, 3,998,607, 4,057,512, 4,092,125, 4,094,650, 4,204,843, 4,468,231, 4,500,323, 4,541,841, 4,551,155, 4,558,027, 4,606,105, 4,617,027, 4,609,456, 5,017,282, 5,055,181, 6,187,465, 6,790,430, 6,894,183, 6,955,695, US2003/0167961A1, US2006/0265953A1, US2007/000177A1, US2007/083072A1, US2007/0277437A1 and GB1599932.
The process for the catalytic gasification of a carbonaceous material to synthetic natural gas requires the presence of steam to react with carbon either in the gas phase or on the surface of the carbonaceous material to generate methane and carbon dioxide. It has generally been contemplated to utilize coal-fired boilers to generate the required steam. Such methods have the disadvantages of requiring an additional fuel source for the boiler, while producing an exhaust comprising additional acid gases (e.g, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides), which must be treated and exhausted to the atmosphere or otherwise sequestered. As such, there exists a need in the art to develop apparatuses and processes for the catalytic gasification of carbonaceous materials to synthetic natural gas which more efficiently utilize fuels sources while decreasing the carbon footprint of the overall process.
In a first aspect, a gasifier apparatus is provided for producing a first plurality of gases comprising methane and one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons from a catalyzed carbonaceous feedstock, the gasifier apparatus comprising: a fluidized bed gasifier configured to receive the catalyzed carbonaceous feedstock and a second plurality of gases comprising steam, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, and to exhaust the first plurality of gases; and a slurry gasifier configured to supply to the fluidized bed gasifier the second plurality of gases, the slurry gasifier comprising, a gasifier chamber; a slurry conduit for supplying an aqueous carbonaceous slurry as a reactant to the gasifier chamber; an optional syngas conduit in communication with a syngas source and the gasifier chamber for optionally supplying a syngas to the gasifier chamber; an oxygen gas conduit for supplying enriched oxygen gas as a reactant to the fluidized bed gasifier chamber; and a heated gas conduit in communication with the fluidized bed gasifier for supplying the second plurality of gases from the slurry gasifier to the fluidized bed gasifier.
In a second aspect, a slurry gasifier is provided for generating a plurality of gases comprising steam, hydrogen and carbon monoxide from an aqueous carbonaceous slurry, the slurry gasifier comprising, a gasifier chamber; an optional syngas conduit in communication with a syngas source and the gasifier chamber for optionally supplying a syngas to the gasifier chamber; an oxygen gas conduit for supplying enriched oxygen gas as a reactant to the gasifier chamber; a slurry conduit for supplying an aqueous carbonaceous slurry as a reactant to the gasifier chamber; and a heated gas conduit for exhausting the plurality of gases.
In a third aspect, a process is provided for generating a plurality of gases comprising steam, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, from an aqueous carbonaceous slurry, the process comprising the steps of: (a) providing a slurry gasifier; (b) supplying the slurry gasifier with an aqueous carbonaceous slurry, an enriched oxygen gas, and optionally a syngas, the slurry comprising carbonaceous matter and water in a weight ratio of from about 5:95 to about 60:40; and (c) reacting the aqueous carbonaceous slurry in the slurry gasifier in the presence of oxygen and under suitable temperature and pressure so as to generate the plurality of gases.
In a fourth aspect, a process is provided for converting a carbonaceous material into a first plurality of gases comprising methane and one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons, the process comprising the steps of: providing a gasifier apparatus having a fluidized bed gasifier and a slurry gasifier according to the first aspect; supplying a particulate composition comprising a carbonaceous material and a gasification catalyst to the fluidized bed gasifier, wherein the gasification catalyst, in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure, exhibits gasification activity whereby the first plurality of gases is formed; supplying an aqueous carbonaceous slurry, enriched oxygen gas and optionally a syngas to the slurry gasifier; reacting the aqueous carbonaceous slurry in the slurry gasifier in the presence of oxygen and under suitable temperature and pressure so as to generate a second plurality of gases comprising steam, hydrogen and carbon monoxide; introducing the second plurality of gases into the fluidized bed gasifier; reacting the particulate composition in the fluidized bed gasifier in the presence of the second plurality of gases, and under suitable temperature and pressure, to form the first plurality of gases; and at least partially separating the first plurality of gases to produce a stream comprising a predominant amount of one of the gases in the first plurality of gases, wherein the gasification catalyst comprises a source of at least one alkali metal and is present in an amount sufficient to provide, in the particulate composition, a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms ranging from about 0.01 to about 0.08; and the aqueous carbonaceous slurry comprises a mixture of carbonaceous material and water at a weight ratio ranging from about 5:95 to about 60:40.
The present invention relates to steam generating slurry gasifiers for proving high-pressure and high-temperature steam. The slurry gasifiers of the present invention are based on gasification reactors adapted for processing a slurry feedstock comprising at least 40% water. Such slurry gasifiers can be integrated into processes for the catalytic gasification of carbonaceous feedstock.
Recent developments to catalytic gasification technology are disclosed in commonly owned US2007/0000177A1, US2007/0083072A1 and US2007/0277437A1; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008), Ser. No. 12/234,012 (filed 19 Sep. 2008) and Ser. No. 12/234,018 (filed 19 Sep. 2008). Moreover, the processes of the present invention can be practiced in conjunction with the subject matter of the following U.S. Patent Applications, each of which was filed on even date herewith: Ser. No. 12/342,565, entitled “PETROLEUM COKE COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,554, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/342,608, entitled “PETROLEUM COKE COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,663, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FUELS AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING AND USING THEM”; Ser. No. 12/342,715, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/342,578, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,596, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING SYNTHESIS GAS AND SYNGAS-DERIVED PRODUCTS”; Ser. No. 12/342,736, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/343,143, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/343,159, entitled “CONTINUOUS PROCESSES FOR CONVERTING CARBONACEOUS FEEDSTOCK INTO GASEOUS PRODUCTS”; and Ser. No. 12/342,628, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING SYNGAS-DERIVED PRODUCTS”. All of the above are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth.
All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein, if not otherwise indicated, are explicitly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Except where expressly noted, trademarks are shown in upper case.
Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described herein.
Unless stated otherwise, all percentages, parts, ratios, etc., are by weight.
When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as a range, or a list of upper and lower values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper and lower range limits, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope of the present invention be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range.
When the term “about” is used in describing a value or an end-point of a range, the invention should be understood to include the specific value or end-point referred to.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
The use of “a” or “an” to describe the various elements and components herein is merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the invention. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
The materials, methods, and examples herein are illustrative only and, except as specifically stated, are not intended to be limiting.
Steam Generating Gasification Reactors
An embodiment of a steam generating gasification reactor (slurry gasifier; 10) of the invention is illustrated in
When utilized with a slurry feedstock comprising a carbonaceous material, the slurry gasifier exhaust may comprise a plurality of gases including steam, hydrogen, carbon monoxide and other optional gases such as methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, such gases having been generated from the slurry feedstock. The exhaust composition can be controlled based on the composition of the slurry feedstock and/or operating conditions. For example, slurry feedstocks having greater carbon contents can produce higher exhaust concentrations of CO and/or CO2. Further, increased operating temperature can encourage higher concentrations of CO with respect to methane. In general, the steam and the other of the gases are generated at a molar ratio ranging from about 70:30 or from about 60:40, up to about 40:60, or up to about 30:70 (steam: other gases).
In addition, the present slurry gasifier can produce a char (or slag) as a result of the gasification of the slurry feedstock. Typically, the slurry gasifier additionally comprises a conduit for removing char (60) from the base of the gasifier. Appropriate conduits include, but are not limited to, a lock hopper system, although other methods are known to those skilled in the art.
The slurry gasifier temperature will normally be maintained at or above about 450° F., or at or above about 1200° F., and at or below about 2000° F., or at or below about 1600° F.; and the pressure will be at least about 200 psig, or at least about 400 psig, or at least about 600 psig, or at least about 1000 psig, up to about 1500 psig, or up to about 2000 psig, and in particular, about 600 psig to about 2000 psig, or about 1000 psig to about 2000 psig.
In one embodiment, the slurry gasifier of the invention can serve to supply the required steam, via the heated conduit (50), to a catalytic gasification reactor for the production of a gaseous product from a carbonaceous feedstock. Generally, when used as such, the operating temperature and pressure of the slurry gasifier will be greater than the catalytic gasification reactor operating temperature and pressure.
In certain embodiments, the slurry gasifier comprises a fluidized bed reactor (80). In such cases, reaction bed fluidization may be maintained by the introduction of a syngas via the optional syngas conduit (20). In some instances, the syngas source (30) can be a recycle syngas stream from a gas separation operation, as discussed below with respect to integration for catalytic gasification. As necessary, the recycle syngas can be passed through a gas compressor and/or preheater prior to introduction into the slurry gasifier reaction bed.
Advantageously, by preparing steam for a catalytic gasification process in accordance with the present invention, substantially all of the CO2 produced from steam generation is directed through the gas separation and sequestration processes, as discussed below, enabling a greatly decreased carbon footprint as a result.
Slurry Feedstock for Slurry Gasifier
The feedstock supplied to the slurry gasifier typically comprises an aqueous slurry of a carbonaceous material. The aqueous slurry can contain a ratio of carbonaceous material to water, by weight, which ranges from about 5:95 to about 60:40; for example, the ratio can be about 5:95, about 10:90, about 15:85, about 20:80, about 25:75, about 30:70, about 35:65, or about 40:60, or about 50:50, or about 60:40, or any other value inbetween. Any of carbonaceous materials can be used alone or in combination and slurried with water (as necessary) to produce the aqueous slurry with a predetermined carbon and water content. The carbonaceous material for the slurry feedstock can comprise carbon sources containing at least about 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 80% carbon by dry weight.
The water for preparing the aqueous slurry can either be produced from a clean water feed (e.g., a municipal water supply) and/or recycle processes. For example, reclaimed water from sour water stripping operation (601,
The term “carbonaceous material” as used herein refers to any carbonaceous material including, but not limited to coal, petroleum coke, asphaltenes, liquid petroleum residues, used motor oil and other waste processed petroleum sources, untreated or treated sewage waste, garbage, plastics, wood and other biomass, or mixtures thereof.
The term “petroleum coke” as used herein includes (i) the solid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues); and (ii) the solid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands) Such carbonization products include, for example, green, calcined, needle and fluidized bed petroleum coke. Petroleum coke is generally prepared via delayed coking or fluid coking. The petroleum coke can be residual material remaining after retorting tar sands (e.g., mined) are heated to extract any oil.
Resid petcoke can be derived from a crude oil, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity residual crude oil, which petroleum coke contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the coke. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash cokes predominantly comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.
Tar sands petcoke can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the tar sands petcoke. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash cokes predominantly comprises materials such as compounds of silicon and/or aluminum.
The petroleum coke can comprise at least about 70 wt % carbon, at least about 80 wt % carbon, or at least about 90 wt % carbon, based on the total weight of the petroleum coke. Typically, the petroleum coke comprises less than about 20 wt % percent inorganic compounds, based on the weight of the petroleum coke.
The term “liquid petroleum residue” as used herein includes both (i) the liquid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues—“resid liquid petroleum residue”) and (ii) the liquid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands—“tar sands liquid petroleum residue”). The liquid petroleum residue is substantially non-solid; for example, it can take the form of a thick fluid or a sludge.
Resid liquid petroleum residue can be derived from a crude oil, for example, by processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity crude oil distillation residue. Such liquid petroleum residue contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the residue. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash residues predominantly comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.
Tar sands liquid petroleum residue can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands liquid petroleum residue contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the residue. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash residues predominantly comprises materials such as compounds of silicon and/or aluminum.
The term “coal” as used herein means peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, anthracite, graphite, or mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the coal has a carbon content of less than about 85%, or less than about 80%, or less than about 75%, or less than about 70%, or less than about 65%, or less than about 60%, or less than about 55%, or less than about 50% by weight, based on the total coal weight. In other embodiments, the coal has a carbon content ranging up to about 85%, or up to about 80%, or up to about 75% by weight, based on total coal weight. Examples of useful coals include, but are not limited to, Illinois #6, Pittsburgh #8, Beulah (ND), Utah Blind Canyon, and Powder River Basin (PRB) coals. Anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, and lignite coal may contain about 10 wt %, from about 5 to about 7 wt %, from about 4 to about 8 wt %, and from about 9 to about 11 wt %, ash by total weight of the coal on a dry basis, respectively. However, the ash content of any particular coal source will depend on the rank and source of the coal, as is familiar to those skilled in the art. See, for example, “Coal Data: A Reference”, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), February 1995.
Asphaltenes typically comprise aromatic carbonaceous solids at room temperature, and can be derived, from example, from the processing of crude oil, oil shale, bitumen, and tar sands.
In addition, the carbonaceous material for the slurry feedstock can comprise the char produced in a catalytic gasification reactor, after gasification catalyst recovery, as discussed below.
Catalytic Gasification Methods
The slurry gasifier (100,
The catalytic gasification reactor (catalytic gasifier; 200) for such processes are typically operated at moderately high pressures and temperature, requiring introduction of the catalyzed feedstock (405) to the reaction zone of the catalytic gasifier while maintaining the required temperature, pressure, and flow rate of the feedstock. Those skilled in the art are familiar with feed systems for providing feedstocks to high pressure and/or temperature environments, including, star feeders, screw feeders, rotary pistons, and lock-hoppers. It should be understood that the feed system can include two or more pressure-balanced elements, such as lock hoppers, which would be used alternately.
The catalyzed feedstock is provided to the catalytic gasifier (200) from a feedstock preparation operation (400), and generally comprises a particulate composition of a crushed carbonaceous material and a gasification catalyst, as discussed below. In some instances, the catalyzed feedstock (405) can be prepared at pressures conditions above the operating pressure of catalytic gasifier. Hence, the catalyzed feedstock (405) can be directly passed into the catalytic gasifier without further pressurization.
Any of several catalytic gasifiers (200) can be utilized in the process of the described herein. Suitable gasifiers include counter-current fixed bed, co-current fixed bed, fluidized bed, entrained flow, and moving bed reactors. The pressure in the catalytic gasifier (200) typically can be from about 10 to about 100 atm (from about 150 to about 1500 psig). The gasification reactor temperature can be maintained around at least about 450° C., or at least about 600° C., or at least about 900° C., or at least about 750° C., or about 600° C. to about 700° C.; and at pressures of at least about 50 psig, or at least about 200 psig, or at least about 400 psig, to about 1000 psig, or to about 700 psig, or to about 600 psig.
The gas utilized in the catalytic gasifier for pressurization and reactions of the particulate composition comprises steam, and optionally, oxygen or air. The latter can be supplied, as necessary, to the reactor according to methods known to those skilled in the art (not shown in
Steam is supplied to the catalytic gasifier from the exhaust (101) of the slurry gasifier (100) of the present invention and is conveyed via a heated gas conduit from the slurry gasifier to the catalytic gasifier (200). The slurry gasifier (100) is fed with a slurry feedstock (404), as discussed previously, from a slurry feedstock preparation operation (402) and an enriched oxygen gas stream (103). Therein, in one example, fines (403) generated in the crushing of carbonaceous materials for the preparation of the catalyzed feedstock (401) for the catalytic gasifier can be used in preparing (402) the present slurry feedstock (404). Notably, a second source for fines can be from waste fines from bituminous coal cleaning and existing waste coal impoundments or ponds, thereby aiding in improving and preventing environmental pollution as a result of mining and processing operations.
Recycled steam from other process operations can also be used for supplementing steam to the catalytic gasifier. For example in the preparation of the catalyzed feedstock, when slurried particulate composition are dried with a fluid bed slurry drier, as discussed previously, then the steam generated can be fed to the catalytic gasification reactor (200).
The small amount of required heat input for the catalytic gasifier can be provided by superheating a gas mixture of steam and recycle gas feeding the gasification reactor by any method known to one skilled in the art. In one method, compressed recycle gas of CO and H2 can be mixed with steam and the resulting steam/recycle gas mixture can be further superheated by heat exchange with the catalytic gasifier effluent followed by superheating in a recycle gas furnace.
A methane reformer (1000) can be optionally included in the process to supplement the recycle CO and H2 stream and the exhaust (101) from the slurry gasifier to ensure that the catalytic gasifier is run under substantially thermally neutral (adiabatic) conditions. In such instances, methane (901a) can be supplied for the reformer from the methane product (901), as described below.
Reaction of the catalyzed feedstock (405) in the catalytic gasifier (200) and the slurry feedstock (404) in the slurry gasifier (100), under the described conditions, provides a crude product gas and a char (202) from the catalytic gasification reactor and an exhaust gas (101) and char (102) for the slurry gasifier.
The char produced in the catalytic gasifier (202) processes is typically removed from the catalytic gasifier for sampling, purging, and/or catalyst recovery in a continuous or batch-wise manner. Methods for removing char are well known to those skilled in the art. One such method taught by EP-A-0102828, for example, can be employed. The char can be periodically withdrawn from the catalytic gasification reactor through a lock hopper system, although other methods are known to those skilled in the art.
Often, the char (202) from the catalytic gasifier is directed to a catalyst recovery and recycle process (300). Processes have been developed to recover alkali metal from the solid purge in order to reduce raw material costs and to minimize environmental impact of a catalytic gasification process. For example, the char (202) can be quenched with recycle gas and water and directed to a catalyst recycling operation for extraction and reuse of the alkali metal catalyst. Particularly useful recovery and recycling processes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,138, as well as previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,512, US2007/0277437A1, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/342,554, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/342,715, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/342,736, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/343,143, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”. Reference can be had to those documents for further process details.
Upon completion of catalyst recovery, both the char, substantially free of the gasification catalysts (302) as described herein, and the recovered catalyst (301) (as a solution or solid) can be directed to the feedstock preparation operation (400) comprising a catalyzed feedstock preparation process (401) and a slurry feedstock preparation process (402), as described herein.
The char (102) produced in the slurry gasifier (100) reactor is typically removed via similar methods to those described for the catalytic gasification reactor. However, the char (102) from the slurry gasifier (100) is not normally processed through catalyst recovery, but rather, can be processed for disposal.
Crude product gas effluent (201) leaving the catalytic gasifier (200) can pass through a portion of the reactor which serves as a disengagement zone where particles too heavy to be entrained by the gas leaving the reactor (i.e., fines) are returned to the fluidized bed. The disengagement zone can include one or more internal cyclone separators or similar devices for removing fines and particulates from the gas. The gas effluent (201) passing through the disengagement zone and leaving the catalytic gasifier generally contains CH4, CO2, H2 and CO, H2S, NH3, unreacted steam, entrained fines, and other contaminants such as COS.
The gas stream from which the fines have been removed (201) can then be passed through a heat exchanger (500) to cool the gas and the recovered heat can be used to preheat recycle gas and generate high pressure steam (501). Residual entrained fines can also be removed by any suitable means such as external cyclone separators followed by Venturi scrubbers. The recovered fines can be processed to recover alkali metal catalyst then passed to the slurry feedstock preparation process (402) or returned to the catalytic gasification reactor (100).
The gas stream (502) exiting the Venturi scrubbers can be fed to a gas purification operation (600) comprising COS hydrolysis reactors (601) for COS removal (sour process) and further cooled in a heat exchanger to recover residual heat prior to entering water scrubbers (602) for ammonia recovery, yielding a scrubbed gas comprising at least H2S, CO2, CO, H2 and CH4. Methods for COS hydrolysis are known to those skilled in the art, for example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,100,256. The residual heat from the scrubbed gas can be used to generate low pressure steam.
Scrubber water (605) and sour process condensate (604) can be processed to strip and recover H2S, CO2 and NH3; such processes are well known to those skilled in the art. NH3 can typically be recovered as an aqueous solution (e.g., 20 wt %). Alternatively, scrubber water (605) and sour process condensate (604) can be returned to the slurry gasifier, thereby reducing overall process water usage and eliminating separate cleanup of these process streams.
A subsequent acid gas removal process (603) can be used to remove H2S and CO2 from the scrubbed gas stream by a physical absorption method involving solvent treatment of the gas to give a cleaned gas stream. Such processes involve contacting the scrubbed gas with a solvent such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, methyldiethanolamine, diisopropylamine, diglycolamine, a solution of sodium salts of amino acids, methanol, hot potassium carbonate or the like. One method can involve the use of Selexol® (UOP LLC, Des Plaines, Ill. USA) or Rectisol® (Lurgi AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) solvent having two trains; each train consisting of an H2S absorber and a CO2 absorber. The spent solvent (607) containing H2S, CO2 and other contaminants can be regenerated by any method known to those skilled in the art, including contacting the spent solvent with steam or other stripping gas to remove the contaminants or by passing the spent solvent through stripper columns. Recovered acid gases can be sent for sulfur recovery processing; for example, any recovered H2S from the acid gas removal and sour water stripping can be converted to elemental sulfur by any method known to those skilled in the art, including the Claus process. Sulfur can be recovered as a molten liquid. Stripped water can be directed for recycled use in preparation of the catalyzed feedstock and/or slurry feedstock.
Advantageously, CO2 generated in the process, whether in the steam generation or catalytic gasification or both, can be recovered for subsequent use or sequestration, enabling a greatly decreased carbon footprint (as compared to direct combustion of the feedstock) as a result.
The resulting cleaned gas stream (606) exiting the gas purification operation (600) contains mostly CH4, H2, and CO and, typically, small amounts of CO2 and H2O. The cleaned gas stream (606) can be further processed to separate and recover CH4 by any suitable gas separation method (900) known to those skilled in the art including, but not limited to, cryogenic distillation and the use of molecular sieves or ceramic membranes. One method for recovering CH4 from the cleaned gas stream involves the combined use of molecular sieve absorbers to remove residual H2O and CO2, and cryogenic distillation to fractionate and recover CH4. Typically, two gas streams can be produced by the gas separation process (900), a methane product stream (901) and a syngas stream (902, H2 and CO).
The syngas stream (902) can be compressed and recycled. One option can be to recycle the syngas steam directly to the catalytic gasifier (200). In one case, the recycled syngas is combined with the exhaust gas (101) from the slurry gasifier, and the mixture introduced into the catalytic gasification reactor (200). In another case, as exemplified in
If necessary, a portion of the methane product (901a) can be directed to a reformer (1000), as discussed previously. The need to direct a portion of the methane product can be controlled, for example, by the ratio of CO to H2 in the exhaust gas from the slurry gasifier (100). Particularly, methane can be directed to a reformer to supplement (1001) the exhaust gas (101) supplied to the catalytic gasification reactor and, in some instance, provide a ratio of about 3:1 of H2 to CO in the feed to the catalytic gasification reactor. A portion of the methane product can also be used as plant fuel for a gas turbine.
Feedstock for Catalytic Gasification
The catalyzed feedstock (405) for the catalytic gasifier typically comprises at least one carbonaceous material, as discussed previously, and a gasification catalyst.
The catalyzed feedstock is typically supplied as a fine particulate having an average particle size of from about 250 microns, or from about 25 microns, up to about 500, or up to about 2500 microns. One skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate particle size for the individual particulates and the catalyzed feedstock. For example, when a fluid bed gasification reactor is used, the catalyzed feedstock can have an average particle size which enables incipient fluidization of the catalyzed feedstock at the gas velocity used in the fluid bed gasification reactor.
Catalyst Components
The catalyzed feedstock further comprises an amount of an alkali metal component, as alkali metal and/or a compound containing alkali metal, as well as optional co-catalysts, as disclosed in the previous incorporated references. Typically, the quantity of the alkali metal component in the composition is sufficient to provide a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms ranging from about 0.01, or from about 0.02, or from about 0.03, or from about 0.04, to about 0.06, or to about 0.07, or to about 0.08. Further, the alkali metal is typically loaded onto a carbon source to achieve an alkali metal content of from about 3 to about 10 times more than the combined ash content of the carbonaceous material (e.g., coal and/or petroleum coke), on a mass basis.
Suitable alkali metals are lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and mixtures thereof. Particularly useful are potassium sources. Suitable alkali metal compounds include alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, formates, oxalates, amides, hydroxides, acetates, or similar compounds. For example, the catalyst can comprise one or more of Na2CO3, K2CO3, Rb2CO3, Li2CO3, Cs2CO3, NaOH, KOH, RbOH or CsOH, and particularly, potassium carbonate and/or potassium hydroxide.
Methods for Making the Catalyzed Feedstock
The carbonaceous material for use in the preparation of the particulate composition can require initial processing to prepare the catalyzed feedstock (405) for catalytic gasification. For example, when using a catalyzed feedstock comprising a mixture of two or more carbonaceous materials, such as petroleum coke and coal, the petroleum coke and coal can be separately processed to add catalyst to one or both portions, and subsequently mixed. Alternately, the carbonaceous materials can be combined immediately prior to the addition of a catalyst.
The carbonaceous materials can be crushed and/or ground according to any methods known in the art, such as impact crushing and wet or dry grinding to yield particulates of each. Depending on the method utilized for crushing and/or grinding of the carbonaceous material, the resulting particulates can be sized (i.e., separated according to size) to provide an appropriate feedstock.
Any method known to those skilled in the art can be used to size the particulates. For example, sizing can be preformed by screening or passing the particulates through a screen or number of screens. Screening equipment can include grizzlies, bar screens, and wire mesh screens. Screens can be static or incorporate mechanisms to shake or vibrate the screen. Alternatively, classification can be used to separate the petroleum coke and coal particulates. Classification equipment can include ore sorters, gas cyclones, hydrocyclones, rake classifiers, rotating trommels, or fluidized classifiers. The carbonaceous material can be also sized or classified prior to grinding and/or crushing. Any fines (403) separated from the preparation process can be directed to preparation (402) of the slurry feedstock for the slurry gasification reactor (100), as discussed previously.
Additional feedstock processing steps may be necessary depending on the qualities of carbonaceous materials. For example, carbonaceous materials containing high moisture levels, such as raw and/or treated sewage and high-moisture coals, can require drying prior to crushing. Some caking coals can require partial oxidation to simplify gasification reactor operation. Various coals deficient in ion-exchange sites can be pre-treated to create additional ion-exchange sites to facilitate catalysts loading and/or association. Such pre-treatments can be accomplished by any method known to the art that creates ion-exchange capable sites and/or enhances the porosity of a coal feed (see, for example, previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,231 and GB1599932). Often, pre-treatment is accomplished in an oxidative manner using any oxidant known to the art.
In one example, coal is typically wet ground and sized (e.g., to a particle size distribution of about 25 to 2500 microns) and then drained of its free water (i.e., dewatered) to a wet cake consistency. Examples of suitable methods for the wet grinding, sizing, and dewatering are known to those skilled in the art; for example, see previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008).
Any methods known to those skilled in the art can be used to associate one or more gasification catalysts with the carbonaceous material. Such methods include but are not limited to, admixing with a solid catalyst source, impregnating the catalyst on to the carbonaceous material particulate, incipient wetness impregnation, evaporative impregnation, vacuum impregnation, dip impregnation, and combinations of these methods. Gasification catalysts can be impregnated into the carbonaceous materials (i.e., particulate) by slurrying with a solution (e.g., aqueous) of the catalyst.
The carbonaceous material particulate can be treated to associate at least a first catalyst (e.g., gasification catalyst) therewith, providing the catalyzed feedstock. In some cases, a second catalyst (e.g., co-catalyst) can be provided; in such instances, the particulate can be treated in separate processing steps to provide the first catalyst and second catalysts. For example, the primary gasification catalyst can be supplied (e.g., a potassium and/or sodium source), followed by a separate treatment to provide a co-catalyst source. Alternatively, the first and second catalysts can be provided as a mixture in a single treatment.
One particular method suitable for combining coals with the gasification catalysts and optional co-catalysts to provide a particulate composition where the various components have been associated with the coal particulate via ion exchange is described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008). The ion exchange loading mechanism is maximized (based on adsorption isotherms specifically developed for the coal), and the additional catalyst retained on wet including those inside the pores is controlled so that the total catalyst target value is obtained in a controlled manner. Such loading provides a particulate composition as a wet cake. The catalyst loaded and dewatered wet coal cake typically contains, for example, about 50% moisture. The total amount of catalyst loaded is controlled by controlling the concentration of catalyst components in the solution, as well as the contact time, temperature and method, as can be readily determined by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art based on the characteristics of the starting coal.
Additional particulates derived from carbonaceous materials can be combined with the catalyzed feedstock prior to introduction into the catalytic gasification reactor by any methods known to those skilled in the art. For example, a catalyzed feedstock comprising a coal particulate and a gasification catalyst can be combined with biomass. Such methods include, but are not limited to, kneading, and vertical or horizontal mixers, for example, single or twin screw, ribbon, or drum mixers. The catalyzed feedstock (405) can be stored for future use or transferred to a feed operation for introduction into a gasification reactor. The catalyzed feedstock (405) can be conveyed to storage or feed operations according to any methods known to those skilled in the art, for example, a screw conveyer or pneumatic transport.
As-received coal (Powder River Basin) can be stage-crushed to maximize the amount of material having particle sizes ranging from about 0.85 to about 1.4 mm. Fines (<0.85 mm) can be separated from the crushed materials by vibratory screening and directed for preparation of the slurry feedstock.
The crushed coal can be slurried with an aqueous solution of potassium carbonate, dewatered, and dried via a fluid bed slurry drier to yield a catalyzed feedstock containing 185 lb coal (88 wt %), 14.9 lb catalyst (7 wt %), and 10.5 lb moisture (5 wt %). The coal fines separated at the crushing stage can be slurried with water to a composition of 75 wt % water (263 lb) and 25 wt % coal fines (88 lb) by weight and subsequently can be used as the slurry feedstock for the slurry gasifier.
The slurry feedstock of Example 1 can be provided to a fluidized bed gasification reactor (slurry gasifier) fed by an enriched oxygen source (96 lb/hr) and a syngas source (17.7 w % H2, 82.3% CO; 75.48 lb/hr). Typical gasification conditions for the slurry gasifier would be: total pressure 550 psi, and temperature, 1700-1900° F.; char would be generated at a rate of 12.1 lb/hr.
The resulting exhaust (561.6 lb/hr) from the slurry gasifier would contain steam (277.5 lb/hr), hydrogen (12.89 lb/hr), CO (62.27 lb/hr), CO2 (187.84 lb/hr) and methane (11.06 lb/hr), and could be provided to a second fluidized bed gasification reactor (catalytic gasifier) supplied with the catalyzed feedstock (210 lb/hr) of Example 1. The catalyzed feedstock would be introduced under a positive pressure of nitrogen (45.8 lb/hr). Typical conditions for the catalytic gasifier would be: total pressure, 500 psi and temperature, 1200° F. The effluent of the catalytic gasifier (34.46 lb/hr) would contain methane (17.7 mol %), CO2 (23.0 mol %), H2 (17 mol. %), CO (8.2 mol %), water (28.9 mol %), H2S (0.1 mol %), ammonia (0.3 mol %), and nitrogen (4.7 mol %).
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/343,149, filed on Dec. 23, 2008, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/017,321 (filed Dec. 28, 2007), the disclosure of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth in this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2605215 | Coghlan | Jul 1952 | A |
2694623 | Welty, Jr. et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2791549 | Jahnig | May 1957 | A |
2813126 | Tierney | Nov 1957 | A |
2840462 | Gorin | Jun 1958 | A |
2860959 | Pettyjohn et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
2886405 | Benson et al. | May 1959 | A |
3034848 | King | May 1962 | A |
3114930 | Oldham et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3150716 | Strelzoff et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3164330 | Neidl | Jan 1965 | A |
3194644 | Gorin et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3351563 | Negra et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3435590 | Smith | Apr 1969 | A |
3531917 | Grunewald et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3544291 | Schlinger et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3594985 | Ameen et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3615300 | Holm et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3689240 | Aldridge et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3740193 | Aldridge et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3746522 | Donath | Jul 1973 | A |
3759036 | White | Sep 1973 | A |
3779725 | Hegarty et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3814725 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3817725 | Sieg et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3828474 | Quartulli | Aug 1974 | A |
3833327 | Pitzer et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3847567 | Kalina et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3876393 | Kasai et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3904386 | Graboski et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3915670 | Lacey et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3920229 | Piggott | Nov 1975 | A |
3926584 | Adsetts | Dec 1975 | A |
3929431 | Koh et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3958957 | Koh et al. | May 1976 | A |
3966875 | Bratzler et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3969089 | Moss et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3971639 | Matthews | Jul 1976 | A |
3972693 | Wiesner et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3975168 | Gorbaty | Aug 1976 | A |
3985519 | Kalina et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3989811 | Hill | Nov 1976 | A |
3996014 | Muller et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
3998607 | Wesselhoft et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
3999607 | Pennington et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4005996 | Hausberger et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4011066 | Bratzler et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4017272 | Anwer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4021370 | Harris et al. | May 1977 | A |
4025423 | Stonner et al. | May 1977 | A |
4044098 | Miller et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4046523 | Kalina et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4052176 | Child et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4053554 | Reed et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4057512 | Vadovic et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4069304 | Starkovich et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4077778 | Nahas et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4091073 | Winkler | May 1978 | A |
4092125 | Stambaugh et al. | May 1978 | A |
4094650 | Koh et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4100256 | Bozzelli et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4101449 | Noda et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4104201 | Banks et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4113615 | Gorbaty | Sep 1978 | A |
4116996 | Huang | Sep 1978 | A |
4118204 | Eakman et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4152119 | Schulz | May 1979 | A |
4157246 | Eakman et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4159195 | Clavenna | Jun 1979 | A |
4162902 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4173465 | Meissner et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4189307 | Marion | Feb 1980 | A |
4193771 | Sharp et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4193772 | Sharp | Mar 1980 | A |
4200439 | Lang | Apr 1980 | A |
4204843 | Neavel | May 1980 | A |
4211538 | Eakman et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4211669 | Eakman et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4219338 | Wolfs et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4223728 | Pegg | Sep 1980 | A |
4225457 | Schulz | Sep 1980 | A |
4235044 | Cheung | Nov 1980 | A |
4243639 | Haas et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4249471 | Gunnerman | Feb 1981 | A |
4252771 | Lagana et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4260421 | Brown et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4265868 | Kamody | May 1981 | A |
4270937 | Adler et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4284416 | Nahas | Aug 1981 | A |
4292048 | Wesselhoft et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4298584 | Makrides | Nov 1981 | A |
4315753 | Bruckenstein et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4315758 | Patel et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4318712 | Lang et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322222 | Sass | Mar 1982 | A |
4330305 | Kuessner et al. | May 1982 | A |
4331451 | Isogaya et al. | May 1982 | A |
4334893 | Lang | Jun 1982 | A |
4336034 | Lang et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4336233 | Appl et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4341531 | Duranleau et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4344486 | Parrish | Aug 1982 | A |
4347063 | Sherwood et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348486 | Calvin et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4348487 | Calvin et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4353713 | Cheng | Oct 1982 | A |
4365975 | Williams et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4372755 | Tolman et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4375362 | Moss | Mar 1983 | A |
4385905 | Tucker | May 1983 | A |
4397656 | Ketkar | Aug 1983 | A |
4400182 | Davies et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4407206 | Bartok et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4428535 | Venetucci | Jan 1984 | A |
4432773 | Euker, Jr. et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4433065 | Van Der Burgt et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4436028 | Wilder | Mar 1984 | A |
4436531 | Estabrook et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4439210 | Lancet | Mar 1984 | A |
4443415 | Queneau et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4444568 | Beisswenger et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4459138 | Soung | Jul 1984 | A |
4462814 | Holmes et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466828 | Tamai et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4468231 | Bartok et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4478425 | Benko | Oct 1984 | A |
4478725 | Velling et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482529 | Chen et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491609 | Degel et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4497784 | Diaz | Feb 1985 | A |
4500323 | Siegfried et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4505881 | Diaz | Mar 1985 | A |
4508544 | Moss | Apr 1985 | A |
4508693 | Diaz | Apr 1985 | A |
4515604 | Eisenlohr et al. | May 1985 | A |
4515764 | Diaz | May 1985 | A |
4524050 | Chen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4540681 | Kustes et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4541841 | Reinhardt | Sep 1985 | A |
4551155 | Wood et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4558027 | McKee et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4572826 | Moore | Feb 1986 | A |
4594140 | Cheng | Jun 1986 | A |
4597775 | Billimoria et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4597776 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604105 | Aquino et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609388 | Adler et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4609456 | Deschamps et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617027 | Lang | Oct 1986 | A |
4619864 | Hendrix et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4620421 | Brown et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4661237 | Kimura et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4668428 | Najjar | May 1987 | A |
4668429 | Najjar | May 1987 | A |
4675035 | Apffel | Jun 1987 | A |
4678480 | Heinrich et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682986 | Lee et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4690814 | Velenyi et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4696678 | Koyama et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4699632 | Babu et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4704136 | Weston et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720289 | Vaugh et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4747938 | Khan | May 1988 | A |
4781731 | Schlinger | Nov 1988 | A |
4803061 | Najjar et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808194 | Najjar et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4810475 | Chu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822935 | Scott | Apr 1989 | A |
4848983 | Tomita et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854944 | Strong | Aug 1989 | A |
4861346 | Najjar et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4861360 | Apffel | Aug 1989 | A |
4872886 | Henley et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876080 | Paulson | Oct 1989 | A |
4892567 | Yan | Jan 1990 | A |
4960450 | Schwarz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4995193 | Soga et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5017282 | Delbianco et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055181 | Maa et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057294 | Sheth et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059406 | Sheth et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074357 | Haines | Dec 1991 | A |
5093094 | Van Kleeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5094737 | Bearden, Jr. et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5132007 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5223173 | Jeffrey | Jun 1993 | A |
5225044 | Breu | Jul 1993 | A |
5236557 | Muller et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250083 | Wolfenbarger et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5277884 | Shinnar et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5388645 | Puri et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5388650 | Michael | Feb 1995 | A |
5435940 | Doering et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5536893 | Gudmundsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5566755 | Seidle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5616154 | Elliott et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630854 | Sealock, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5641327 | Leas | Jun 1997 | A |
5660807 | Forg et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669960 | Couche | Sep 1997 | A |
5670122 | Zamansky et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5720785 | Baker | Feb 1998 | A |
5733515 | Doughty et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5769165 | Bross et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776212 | Leas | Jul 1998 | A |
5785721 | Brooker | Jul 1998 | A |
5788724 | Carugati et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5855631 | Leas | Jan 1999 | A |
5865898 | Holtzapple et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5968465 | Koveal et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6013158 | Wootten | Jan 2000 | A |
6015104 | Rich, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028234 | Heinemann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032737 | Brady et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6090356 | Jahnke et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119778 | Seidle et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132478 | Tsurui et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6180843 | Heinemann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187465 | Galloway | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6379645 | Bucci et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389820 | Rogers et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6419888 | Wyckoff | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6506349 | Khanmamedov | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506361 | Machado et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6602326 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6641625 | Clawson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653516 | Yoshikawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6692711 | Alexion et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6790430 | Lackner et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797253 | Lyon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808543 | Paisley | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830597 | Green | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6855852 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6878358 | Vosteen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894183 | Choudhary et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6955595 | Kim | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955695 | Nahas | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969494 | Herbst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7074373 | Warren et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077202 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7100692 | Parsley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118720 | Mendelsohn et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132183 | Galloway | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7168488 | Olsvik et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7205448 | Gajda et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220502 | Galloway | May 2007 | B2 |
7299868 | Zapadinski | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309383 | Beech, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7481275 | Olsvik et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7666383 | Green | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7677309 | Shaw et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7758663 | Rabovitser et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7897126 | Rappas et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7901644 | Rappas et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922782 | Sheth | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926750 | Hauserman | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7976593 | Graham | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8114176 | Nahas | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114177 | Hippo et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123827 | Robinson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8163048 | Rappas et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8192716 | Raman et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202913 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8268899 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286901 | Rappas et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297542 | Rappas et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8328890 | Reiling et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8349037 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349039 | Robinson | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361428 | Raman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366795 | Raman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8479833 | Raman | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8479834 | Preston | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8502007 | Hippo et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20020036086 | Minkkinen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030070808 | Allison | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030131582 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167691 | Nahas | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040020123 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023086 | Su et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040123601 | Fan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180971 | Inoue et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040256116 | Olsvik et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050107648 | Kimura et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137442 | Gajda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050192362 | Rodriguez et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050287056 | Baker et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288537 | Maund et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060149423 | Barnicki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060228290 | Green | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231252 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265953 | Hobbs | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272813 | Olsvik et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000177 | Hippo et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070051043 | Schingnitz | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083072 | Nahas | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070180990 | Downs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186472 | Rabovitser et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220810 | Leveson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227729 | Zubrin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237696 | Payton | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070277437 | Sheth | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282018 | Jenkins | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080141591 | Kohl | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080289822 | Betzer Tsilevich | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012188 | Rojey et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048476 | Rappas et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090090055 | Ohtsuka | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090090056 | Ohtsuka | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090165361 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165376 | Lau et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165379 | Rappas | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165380 | Lau et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165381 | Robinson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165382 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165383 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165384 | Lau et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090166588 | Spitz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090169448 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090169449 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090170968 | Nahas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173079 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217575 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217582 | May et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217584 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217585 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217586 | Rappas et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217587 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217588 | Hippo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217589 | Robinson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217590 | Rappas et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090218424 | Hauserman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090220406 | Rahman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229182 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235585 | Neels et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236093 | Zubrin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090246120 | Raman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259080 | Raman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260287 | Lau | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305093 | Biollaz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324458 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324459 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324460 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324461 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324462 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100018113 | Bohlig et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100050654 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071235 | Pan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071262 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076235 | Reiling et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100120926 | Robinson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121125 | Hippo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100159352 | Gelin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168494 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168495 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179232 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287835 | Reiling et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287836 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292350 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110031439 | Sirdeshpande et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110062012 | Robinson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062721 | Sirdeshpande et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062722 | Sirdeshpande et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064648 | Preston et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088896 | Preston | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088897 | Raman | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110146978 | Perlman | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146979 | Wallace | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110207002 | Powell et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217602 | Sirdeshpande | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110262323 | Rappas et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110294905 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046510 | Sirdeshpande | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120060417 | Raman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120102836 | Raman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120102837 | Raman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120213680 | Rappas et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271072 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120305848 | Sirdeshpande | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130042824 | Sirdeshpande | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046124 | Sirdeshpande | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130172640 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
966660 | Apr 1975 | CA |
1003217 | Jan 1977 | CA |
1041553 | Oct 1978 | CA |
1106178 | Aug 1981 | CA |
1 125 026 | Jun 1982 | CA |
1187702 | Jun 1985 | CA |
1282243 | Apr 1991 | CA |
1299589 | Apr 1992 | CA |
1332108 | Sep 1994 | CA |
2673121 | Jun 2008 | CA |
2713642 | Jul 2009 | CA |
86101230 | Oct 1986 | CN |
1477090 | Feb 2004 | CN |
1916124 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101045524 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101074397 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101555420 | Oct 2009 | CN |
2 210 891 | Mar 1972 | DE |
2210891 | Sep 1972 | DE |
2852710 | Jun 1980 | DE |
3422202 | Dec 1985 | DE |
10061607 | Jun 2002 | DE |
0024792 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0 067 580 | Dec 1982 | EP |
0102828 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0 138 463 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0 225 146 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0 259 927 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0473153 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 723 930 | Jul 1996 | EP |
819 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1001002 | May 2000 | EP |
1004746 | May 2000 | EP |
1136542 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1 207 132 | May 2002 | EP |
1 741 673 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1768207 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2058471 | May 2009 | EP |
797 089 | Apr 1936 | FR |
2 478 615 | Sep 1981 | FR |
2906879 | Apr 2008 | FR |
593910 | Oct 1947 | GB |
640907 | Aug 1950 | GB |
676615 | Jul 1952 | GB |
701 131 | Dec 1953 | GB |
760627 | Nov 1956 | GB |
798741 | Jul 1958 | GB |
820 257 | Sep 1959 | GB |
996327 | Jun 1965 | GB |
1033764 | Jun 1966 | GB |
1448562 | Sep 1976 | GB |
1453081 | Oct 1976 | GB |
1467219 | Mar 1977 | GB |
1467995 | Mar 1977 | GB |
1 599 932 | Jul 1977 | GB |
1560873 | Feb 1980 | GB |
2078251 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2154600 | Sep 1985 | GB |
2455864 | Jun 2009 | GB |
53094305 | Aug 1978 | JP |
53111302 | Sep 1978 | JP |
54020003 | Feb 1979 | JP |
54150402 | Nov 1979 | JP |
55012181 | Jan 1980 | JP |
56145982 | Nov 1981 | JP |
56157493 | Dec 1981 | JP |
60-35092 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60077938 | May 1985 | JP |
62241991 | Oct 1987 | JP |
62 257985 | Nov 1987 | JP |
63095292 | Apr 1988 | JP |
03-115491 | May 1991 | JP |
2000290659 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000290670 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002105467 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2004292200 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004298818 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2006 169476 | Jun 2006 | JP |
0018681 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0043468 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0240768 | May 2002 | WO |
02079355 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02103157 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03018958 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03033624 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004055323 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004072210 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2006031011 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007004342 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007005284 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007047210 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007068682 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007076363 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007077137 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007077138 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007083072 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007128370 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007143376 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008058636 | May 2008 | WO |
2008073889 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008087154 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009018053 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009048723 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009048724 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009086361 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086362 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086363 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086366 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086367 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086370 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086372 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086374 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086377 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086383 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086407 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009086408 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009111330 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009111331 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009111332 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009111335 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009111342 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009111345 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009124017 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009124019 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009158576 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009158579 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009158580 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009158582 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009158583 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010033846 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010033848 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010033850 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010033852 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010048493 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010078297 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010078298 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010132549 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2010132551 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011017630 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011029278 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029282 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029283 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029284 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029285 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011034888 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011034889 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011034890 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011034891 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011049858 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011049861 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011063608 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011084580 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011084581 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011106285 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011139694 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011150217 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012024369 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012033997 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012061235 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061238 | May 2012 | WO |
2012116003 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012145497 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012166879 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013025808 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013025812 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013052553 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,538, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,548, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,552, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al. |
Asami, K., et al., “Highly Active Iron Catalysts from Ferric Chloride or the Steam Gasification of Brown Coal,” ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 32, No. 8, 1993, pp. 1631-1636. |
Berger, R. et al., “High Temperature CO2-Absorption: A Process Offering New Prospects in Fuel Chemistry,” The Fifth International Symposium on Coal Combustion, Nov. 2003, Nanjing, China, pp. 547-549. |
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” Aug. 2005. |
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” DOE Hydrogen Program Contractors' Review Metting, Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Iowa State University, May 21, 2003. |
Cohen, S.J., Project Manager, “Large Pilot Plant Alternatives for Scaleup of the Catalytic Coal Gasification Process,” FE-2480-20, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. EX-76-C-01-2480, 1979. |
Euker, Jr., C.A., Reitz, R.A., Program Managers, “Exxon Catalytic Coal-Gasification-Process Development Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2777-31, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. ET-78-C-01-2777, 1981. |
Kalina, T., Nahas, N.C., Project Managers, “Exxon Catalaytic Coal Gasification Process Predevelopment Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2369-24, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. E(49-18)-2369, 1978. |
Nahas, N.C., “Exxon Catalytic Coal Gasification Process—Fundamentals to Flowsheets,” Fuel, vol. 62, No. 2, 1983, pp. 239-241. |
Ohtsuka, Y. et al., “Highly Active Catalysts from Inexpensive Raw Materials for Coal Gasification,” Catalysis Today, vol. 39, 1997, pp. 111-125. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al, “Steam Gasification of Low-Rank Coals with a Chlorine-Free Iron Catalyst from Ferric Chloride,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 30, No. 8, 1991, pp. 1921-1926. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Calcium Catalysed Steam Gasification of Yalourn Brown Coal,” Fuel, vol. 65, 1986, pp. 1653-1657. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al, “Iron-Catalyzed Gasification of Brown Coal at Low Temperatures,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 1, No. 1, 1987, pp. 32-36. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al., “Ion-Exchanged Calcium From Calcium Carbonate and Low-Rank Coals: High Catalytic • Activity in Steam Gasification,” Energy & Fuels 1996, 10, pp. 431-435. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Steam Gasification of Coals with Calcium Hydroxide,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 9, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1038-1042. |
Pereira, P., et al., “Catalytic Steam Gasification of Coals,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 6, No. 4, 1992, pp. 407-410. |
Ruan Xiang-Quan, et al., “Effects of Catalysis on Gasification of Tatong Coal Char,” Fuel, vol. 66, Apr. 1987, pp. 568-571. |
Tandon, D., “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal,” College of Engineering in the Graduate School, Southern Illinois university at Carbondale, Jun. 1996. |
Adsorption, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adsorption, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 17, 2007). |
Amine gas treating, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid—gas—removal, pp. 1-4 (Oct. 21, 2007). |
Coal, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal—gasification, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 29, 2007). |
Coal Data: A Reference, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), Feb. 1995. |
Deepak Tandon, Dissertation Approval, “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal”, Jun. 13, 1996. |
Demibras, “Demineralization of Agricultural Residues by Water Leaching”, Energy Sources, vol. 25, pp. 679-687, (2003). |
Fluidized Bed Gasifiers, http://www.energyproducts.com/fluidized—bed—gasifiers.htm, Oct. 2007, pp. 1-5. |
Gas separation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas—separation, pp. 1-2 (Feb. 24, 2007). |
Gasification, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasification, pp. 1-6 (Oct. 29, 2007). |
Gallagher Jr., et al., “Catalytic Coal Gasification for SNG Manufacture”, Energy Research, vol. 4, pp. 137-147, (1980). |
Heinemann, et al., “Fundamental and Exploratory Studies of Catalytic Steam Gasification of Carbonaceous Materials”, Final Report Fiscal Years 1985-1994. |
Jensen, et al. Removal of K and C1 by leaching of straw char, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 20, pp. 447-457, (2001). |
Mengjie, et al., “A potential renewable energy resource development and utilization of biomass energy”, http://www.fao.org.docrep/T4470E/t4470e0n.htm, pp. 1-8 (1994). |
Meyers, et al. Fly Ash as a Construction Material for Highways, A Manual. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, DC, 1976. |
Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag”, Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, DC, 1973. |
Natural gas processing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural—gas—processing, pp. 1-4 (Oct. 22, 2007). |
Natural Gas Processing: The Crucial Link Between Natural Gas Production and Its Transportation to Market. Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas; pp. 1-11, (2006). |
Prins, et al., “Exergetic optimisation of a production process of Fischer-Tropsch fuels from biomass”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 86, pp. 375-389, (2004). |
Reboiler, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboiler, pp. 1-4 (Nov. 11, 2007). |
What is XPS?, http://www.nuance.northwestern.edu/KeckII/xps1.asp, 2006, pp. 1-2 (2006). |
2.3 Types of gasifiers, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0a.htm, pp. 1-6 (1986). |
2.4 Gasification fuels, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0b.htm#TopofPage, pp. 1-8 (1986). |
2.5 Design of downdraught gasifiers, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0c.htm#TopOfPage, pp. 1-8 (1986). |
2.6 Gas cleaning and cooling, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e0d.htm#TopOFPage, pp. 1-3 (1986). |
A.G. Collot et al., “Co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of coal and biomass in bench-scale fixed-bed and fluidized bed reactors”, (1999) Fuel 78, pp. 667-679. |
Wenkui Zhu et al., “Catalytic gasification of char from co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass”, (2008) Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 89, pp. 890-896. |
Chiesa P. et al., “Co-Production of hydrogen, electricity and C02 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions”, (2005) International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 747-767. |
Chiaramonte et al, “Upgrade Coke by Gasification”, (1982) Hydrocarbon Processing, vol. 61 (9), pp. 255-257 (Abstract only). |
Gerdes, Kristin, et al., “Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Performance and Cost Assessment,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Mar. 27, 2009, pp. 1-26. |
Ghosh, S., et al., “Energy Analysis of a Cogeneration Plant Using Coal Gasification and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Energy, 2006, vol. 31, No. 2-3, pp. 345-363. |
Jeon, S.K., et al., “Characteristics of Steam Hydrogasification of Wood Using a Micro-Batch Reactor,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, pp. 2817-2823. |
Li, Mu, et al., “Design of Highly Efficient Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Power Plants,” Journal of Power Sources, 2010, vol. 195, pp. 5707-5718. |
Prins, M.J., et al., “Exergetic Optimisation of a Production Process of Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Biomass,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 375-389. |
Hydromethanation Process, GreatPoint Energy, Inc., from World Wide Web <http://greatpointenergy.com/ourtechnology.php.> accessed Sep. 5, 2013. |
Sigma-Aldrich “Particle Size Conversion Table” (2004); from World Wide Web <http:/www.sigmaaldrich.com/chemistry/learning-center/technical-library/particle-size-conversion.printerview.html>. |
Coal Conversion Processes (Gasification), Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, vol. 6, pp. 541-566, (1993). |
“Integrate Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)”, WorleyParsons Resources & Energy, Accessed Feb. 24, 2006, http://www.worleyparsons.com/v5/page.aspx?id=164. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150175914 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61017321 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12343149 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 14637578 | US |