The present invention relates to methods for the production of steam for use in a catalytic gasification reactor which have a reduced carbon footprint. In particular, the present invention relates to the use of biomass for the generation of steam for use in the catalytic gasification of a carbonaceous material to yield, in particular, methane.
In view of numerous factors such as higher energy prices and environmental concerns, the production of value-added gaseous products from lower-fuel-value carbonaceous feedstocks, such as biomass, coal and petroleum coke, is receiving renewed attention. The catalytic gasification of such materials to produce methane and other value-added gases is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,828,474, U.S. Pat. No. 3,998,607, U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,512, U.S. Pat. No. 4,092,125, U.S. Pat. No. 4,094,650, U.S. Pat. No. 4,204,843, U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,231, U.S. Pat. No. 4,500,323, U.S. Pat. No. 4,541,841, U.S. Pat. No. 4,551,155, U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,027, U.S. Pat. No. 4,606,105, U.S. Pat. No. 4,617,027, U.S. Pat. No. 4,609,456, U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,282, U.S. Pat. No. 5,055,181, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,465, U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,430, U.S. Pat. No. 6,894,183, U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,695, US2003/0167961A1, US2006/0265953A1, US2007/000177A1, US2007/083072A1, US2007/0277437A1 and GB 1599932.
The process for the catalytic gasification of a carbonaceous material to synthetic natural gas requires the presence of steam to react with carbon to generate methane and carbon dioxide. It has generally been contemplated to utilize coal-fired boilers to generate the required steam. Such methods have the disadvantages of requiring an additional fuel source for the boiler, while producing an exhaust comprising carbon dioxide, which may be exhausted to the atmosphere, representing a substantial carbon footprint for the process. As such, there exists a need in the art to develop processes for the catalytic gasification of carbonaceous materials to synthetic natural gas which more efficiently utilize fuels sources, including those utilized for generating steam, while decreasing the carbon footprint of the overall process.
In a first aspect, the invention provides a process for converting a carbonaceous feedstock into a plurality of gaseous products, the process comprising the steps of: (A) supplying a biomass feedstock to a reactor; (B) at least partially combusting the biomass feedstock in the reactor in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas and under suitable temperature and pressure to generate heat energy; (C) utilizing the heat energy to generate steam; (D) introducing a carbonaceous feedstock, an alkali metal gasification catalyst, and at least a portion of the steam to a gasifier; (E) reacting the carbonaceous feedstock in the gasifier in the presence of the steam and the alkali metal gasification catalyst and under suitable temperature and pressure to form a gas stream comprising a plurality of gaseous products comprising methane and at least one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons; and (F) at least partially separating the plurality of gaseous products to produce a product stream comprising a predominant amount of one of the gaseous products.
In a second aspect, the invention provides a process for converting a carbonaceous feedstock into a plurality of gaseous products, and generating electricity, the process comprising the steps of: (A) supplying a biomass feedstock to a reactor; (B) at least partially combusting the biomass feedstock in the reactor in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas and under suitable temperature and pressure to generate heat energy; (C) utilizing the heat energy to generate steam; (D) dividing the steam into at least a first steam stream and a second steam stream; (E) introducing the first steam stream, a carbonaceous feedstock and an alkali metal gasification catalyst to a gasifier; (F) introducing the second steam stream to a steam turbine to generate electricity; (G) reacting the carbonaceous feedstock in the gasifier in the presence of the first steam stream and the alkali metal gasification catalyst and under suitable temperature and pressure to form a gas stream comprising a plurality of gaseous products comprising methane and at least one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons; (H) at least partially separating the plurality of gaseous products to produce a product stream comprising a predominant amount of one of the gaseous products.
The present invention relates to methods for generating steam for providing to a catalytic gasification reactor, which methods result in reduced carbon footprints. Such methods can be integrated into processes for the catalytic gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock and/or for generating electricity.
The present invention can be practiced, for example, using any of the developments to catalytic gasification technology disclosed in commonly owned US2007/0000177A1, US2007/0083072A1 and US2007/0277437A1; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008), Ser. No. 12/234,012 (filed 19 Sep. 2008) and Ser. No. 12/234,018 (filed 19 Sep. 2008). All of the above are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.
Moreover, the present invention can be practiced in conjunction with the subject matter of the following U.S. Patent Applications, each of which was filed on Dec. 28, 2008: Ser. No. 12/342,554, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/342,565, entitled “PETROLEUM COKE COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,578, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,596, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING SYNTHESIS GAS AND SYNGAS-DERIVED PRODUCTS”; Ser. No. 12/342,608, entitled “PETROLEUM COKE COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,628, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING SYNGAS-DERIVED PRODUCTS”; Ser. No. 12/342,663, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FUELS AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING AND USING THEM”; Ser. No. 12/342,715, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/342,736, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/343,143, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/343,149, entitled “STEAM GENERATING SLURRY GASIFIER FOR THE CATALYTIC GASIFICATION OF A CARBONACEOUS FEEDSTOCK”; and Ser. No. 12/343,159, entitled “CONTINUOUS PROCESSES FOR CONVERTING CARBONACEOUS FEEDSTOCK INTO GASEOUS PRODUCTS”. All of the above are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.
Further, the present invention can be practiced in conjunction with the subject matter of the following U.S. Patent Applications, each of which was filed concurrently herewith: Ser. No. 12/395,293, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING ABSORBENTS AND PROCESSES FOR REMOVING CONTAMINANTS FROM FLUIDS USING THEM”; Ser. No. 12/395,320, entitled “REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT STEAM GENERATION PROCESSES”; Ser. No. 12/395,330, entitled “PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE SEPARATION OF METHANE FROM A GAS STREAM”; Ser. No. 12/395,344, entitled “SELECTIVE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF ACID GASES FROM GASIFICATION PRODUCTS”; Ser. No. 12/395,348, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/395,353, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/395,372, entitled “CO-FEED OF BIOMASS AS SOURCE OF MAKEUP CATALYSTS FOR CATALYTIC COAL GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/395,381, entitled “COMPACTOR-FEEDER”; Ser. No. 12/395,385, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FINES RECYCLE”; Ser. No. 12/395,429, entitled “BIOMASS CHAR COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/395,433, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PARTICULATE COMPOSITIONS”; and Ser. No. 12/395,447, entitled “BIOMASS COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”. All of the above are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth.
All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein, if not otherwise indicated, are explicitly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Except where expressly noted, trademarks are shown in upper case.
Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described herein.
Unless stated otherwise, all percentages, parts, ratios, etc., are by weight.
When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as a range, or a list of upper and lower values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper and lower range limits, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope of the present invention be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range.
When the term “about” is used in describing a value or an end-point of a range, the invention should be understood to include the specific value or end-point referred to.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
The use of “a” or “an” to describe the various elements and components herein is merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the invention. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
The materials, methods, and examples herein are illustrative only and, except as specifically stated, are not intended to be limiting.
Steam Generation Methods
The steam generating processes of the present invention are particularly useful in an integrated catalytic gasification process for converting carbonaceous materials to combustible gases, such as methane, while achieving a low or near zero carbon footprint. In some cases, the carbon footprint may be negative if the exhaust gas produced from the steam generation processes are directed through the catalytic gasification processes, as described herein.
A typical flow chart for integration into a process for generating a combustible gas from a carbonaceous feedstock is illustrated in
In the present processes, the steam provided to the gasifier (200) is generated from action of reactor (100) and is conveyed via a heated gas conduit (110) from the reactor to the catalytic gasifier (200). Reactor (100) includes, but is not limited to, commercial gasification reactors, oxy-fuel combustors, and boilers. Reactor (100) is fed with a biomass feedstock (404), from a feedstock preparation operation (400), and generally, may comprise one or a mixture of biomass materials, as defined herein.
The partial or complete gasification or partial or complete combustion of the biomass feedstock (404) in reactor (100) generates large amounts of heat energy and an exhaust gas comprising carbon dioxide.
Advantageously, this heat energy can be used to contact any type of heat exchanger, in contact with a water source, to generate steam. For example, any of the boilers known to those skilled in the art can be fueled by the biomass feedstock (404) to supply steam to gasifier (200). While any water source can be used to generate steam, the water commonly used in known boiler systems is purified and deionized (about 0.3-1.0 μS/cm) so that corrosive processes are slowed. Such boilers can be powered, for example, through the oxygen-blown combustion of any biomass material. Ultimately, the thermal energy from the gasification or combustion of the biomass feedstock (404) may heat a water source in communication with reactor (100), to produce steam (typically at about 1300° F. and 500 psi).
The steam produced by action of the reactor (100) can be generally variable based on the type of reactor and feedstock being utilized. Preferably, the steam can be provided to the catalytic gasifier in the range of about 550 to about 600 psia and about 1300 to about 1400° F. (about 700 to about 760° C.). More preferably, reactor (100) produces steam at a pressure essentially the same as the conditions being utilized in the catalytic gasifier (200), as any excess heat can be more efficiently captured for use in other operations (e.g., feedstock drying).
In another example, the contacting of water with the heat energy to produce steam may occur within reactor (100) either by the addition of water to the reactor via a separate feed line (not shown in
The steam generated by reactor (100) may be routed, in whole or in part, into one or more heated conduits (105), which may be located at or near an exit conduit carrying the combustion gases, when present. For example, the steam can be divided into a plurality of steam streams (e.g., into at least a first and second steam stream), each comprising a portion of the steam. The portion of the steam which is provided to each stream may be controlled according to methods known in the art. Each steam stream can be routed in a variety of directions. For example, one or more steam streams may be provided the gasification reactor via a heated conduit (110); or one or more steam streams can be used to dry a carbonaceous feedstock (e.g., via heated conduit 130); or one or more steam streams can be routed to a steam turbine (2000, via heated conduit 140) for generation of electricity (2001). In order to avoid excessive cooling of the steam during transport, the contents of the heated conduits may be superheated according to methods known to those skilled in the art (e.g., via contact with a heat exchanger) prior to delivery of the steam to any endpoint. In one particular example, all the steam generated from reactor (100) is provided to gasifier (200).
A separate exhaust gas may be generated from combustion of the biomass feedstock in reactor (100), which may be (i) exhausted from the process; (ii) supplied with the generated steam via heated conduit (110) to gasifier (200); or (iii) supplied to gasifier (200) via a second heated conduit (120) (i.e., the exit conduit). By optionally directing the exhaust gas from reactor (100) through the catalytic gasifier (200) and the associated gas purification and separation unit operations (infra), essentially all the carbon dioxide produced from the steam generation process as well as from the gasification of a carbonaceous material may be recovered, yielding an overall catalytic gasification process having a near zero, or possibly negative, carbon footprint.
By “carbon footprint”, reference is made to the carbon dioxide released into the environment from non-biomass sources, for example, from the combustion of fossil fuels and release of the resulting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Capture and sequestration of all carbon dioxide generated from non-biomass sources would be considered to have a neutral carbon footprint, as no carbon dioxide would have been released into the atmosphere.
By contrast, the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from biomass sources is considered carbon footprint neutral, since biomass is created (for example, directly as a plant, or indirectly as part of the food chain) by the capture and conversion of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. As such, the capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide generated from biomass sources can actually result in a negative (reduced) carbon footprint.
Steam can also be supplied from a second gasification reactor (100) coupled with a combustion turbine, the exhaust gas of which contacts a heat exchanger in contact with a water source (e.g., a boiler system), to produce steam. The steam and exhaust gas (from the combustion turbine) may be directed as discussed previously.
Recycled steam from other process operations can also be used for supplementing steam to the catalytic gasifier. For example, in the preparation of a particulate carbonaceous feedstock, when a slurried particulate composition is dried with a fluid bed slurry drier, as discussed below, then the generated steam may be fed to the catalytic gasification reactor (200).
The small amount of required heat input for the catalytic gasifier (200) can be provided by, for example, superheating the steam provided to the gasifier; or superheating a mixture of the steam and any second gas source feeding the gasification reactor (e.g., the exhaust from reactor (100)). In one embodiment, compressed recycle gas comprising CO and H2 (902, infra) can be mixed with the steam and the resulting steam/recycle gas mixture can be further superheated by heat exchange with the catalytic gasifier effluent followed by superheating in a recycle gas furnace for introduction into gasifier (200).
Catalytic Gasification Methods
Catalytic gasifier (200) utilizes a gas comprising steam, and optionally, other gases such as oxygen or air, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, for pressurization and reactions of the carbonaceous feedstock. The catalytic gasification reactor (200) can be operated at moderately high pressures and temperature. Typically, a carbonaceous feedstock (405) and a gasification catalyst (e.g., an alkali metal gasification catalyst) are introduced to a reaction zone of the catalytic gasifier (200) while maintaining the required temperature, pressure, and flow rate of the feedstock. Those skilled in the art are familiar with feed systems for providing feedstocks to high pressure and/or temperature environments, including, star feeders, screw feeders, rotary pistons, and lock-hoppers. It should be understood that the feed system can include two or more pressure-balanced elements, such as lock hoppers, which would be used alternately.
The carbonaceous feedstock and gasification catalyst may be introduced separately or combined as a catalyzed feedstock (infra) and are provided to the catalytic gasifier (200) from a feedstock preparation operation (400). In some instances, the carbonaceous feedstock (405) can be prepared at pressures conditions above the operating pressure of catalytic gasifier. Hence, the carbonaceous feedstock (405) may be directly passed into the catalytic gasifier without further pressurization.
Any of several catalytic gasifiers (200) can be utilized in the process of the described herein. Suitable gasifiers include, but are not limited to, counter-current fixed bed, co-current fixed bed, fluidized bed, entrained flow, and moving bed reactors. A catalytic gasifier for gasifying liquid feeds, such as liquid petroleum residues, is disclosed in previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,695.
The pressure in the catalytic gasifier (200) typically can be from about 10 to about 100 atm (from about 150 to about 1500 psig). The gasification reactor temperature can be maintained around at least about 450° C., or at least about 600° C., or at least about 900° C., or at least about 750° C., or about 600° C. to about 700° C.; and at pressures of at least about 50 psig, or at least about 200 psig, or at least about 400 psig, to about 1000 psig, or to about 700 psig, or to about 600 psig.
In one embodiment, an optional methane reformer (1000) may be included in the process. For example, when reactor (100) is a gasification reactor, a methane reformer (1000) may supplement the recycle CO and H2 stream, the exhaust gas (120, as shown in
Reaction of the carbonaceous feedstock (405) in the catalytic gasifier (200), in the presence of one or more gasification catalysts under the described conditions, provides a crude product gas. When the exhaust gas (120) from reactor (100) is provided in whole to the gasifier (200), the crude product gas can comprise essentially all the carbon dioxide produced from reactor (100) and gasifier (200). Additionally, both reactor (100) and gasifier (200) produce a char (102 and 202, respectively).
The char produced in the catalytic gasifier (202) is typically removed from the gasifier for sampling, purging, and/or catalyst recovery in a continuous or batch-wise manner. Methods for removing char are well known to those skilled in the art. One such method taught by EP-A-0102828, for example, can be employed. The char can be periodically withdrawn from the catalytic gasification reactor through a lock hopper system, although other methods are known to those skilled in the art.
Often, the char (202) is directed to a catalyst recovery and recycle process (300) to produce a recycled catalyst stream (301) and a depleted char. Processes have been developed to recover alkali metal from the solid purge in order to reduce raw material costs and to minimize environmental impact of a catalytic gasification process. For example, the char (202) can be quenched with recycle gas and water and directed to a catalyst recycling operation for extraction and reuse of the alkali metal catalyst. Particularly useful recovery and recycling processes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,138, as well as previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,512 and US2007/0277437A1, and previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/342,554, 12/342,715, 12/342,736 and 12/343,143. Reference can be had to those documents for further process details.
Upon completion of catalyst recovery, the recovered catalyst stream (301) (as a solution or solid) may be directed to the second feedstock preparation unit (403) of the feedstock preparation operation (400), as described herein. The depleted char may be utilized as a co-feedstock for reactor (100) (not shown in
The char (102) produced in reactor (100) is typically removed via similar methods to those described for the catalytic gasification reactor, and may be recovered and extracted to provide a leachate for preparing the carbonaceous feedstock (405), as described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,433, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PARTICULATE COMPOSITIONS”; or may be recovered and utilized, itself, as part of the second carbonaceous feedstock (405), as described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,429, entitled “BIOMASS CHAR COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”.
Crude product gas effluent leaving the catalytic gasifier (200) can pass through a portion of the reactor which serves as a disengagement zone where particles too heavy to be entrained by the gas leaving the reactor (i.e., fines) are returned to the fluidized bed. The disengagement zone can include one or more internal cyclone separators or similar devices for removing fines and particulates from the gas. The gas effluent (201) passing through the disengagement zone and leaving the catalytic gasifier generally contains CH4, CO2, H2 and CO, H2S, NH3, other higher hydrocarbons, unreacted steam, entrained fines, and other contaminants such as COS.
The gas stream from which the fines have been removed (201) can then be passed through a heat exchanger (500) to cool the gas and the recovered heat can be used to preheat recycle gas and generate high pressure steam (501). Residual entrained fines can also be removed by any suitable means such as external cyclone separators, optionally followed by Venturi scrubbers. The recovered fines can be processed to recover alkali metal catalyst then passed to the feedstock preparation process (400), returned to the catalytic gasification reactor, or directly recycled back to feedstock preparation as described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,385, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FINES RECYCLE”.
The gas stream (502) from which the fines have been removed can be fed to a gas purification operation (600) comprising COS hydrolysis reactors (601) for COS removal (sour process) and further cooled in a heat exchanger to recover residual heat prior to entering water scrubbers (602) for ammonia recovery, yielding a scrubbed gas comprising at least H2S, CO2, CO, H2, and CH4. Methods for COS hydrolysis are known to those skilled in the art, for example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,100,256. The residual heat from the scrubbed gas can be used to generate low pressure steam.
Scrubber water (605) and sour process condensate (604) can be processed to strip and recover H2S, CO2 and NH3; such processes are well known to those skilled in the art. NH3 can typically be recovered as an aqueous solution (e.g., 20 wt %). Alternatively, scrubber water (605) and sour process condensate (604) can be returned to reactor (100), thereby reducing overall process water usage and eliminating separate cleanup of these process streams.
A subsequent acid gas removal process (603) can be used to remove H2S and CO2 from the scrubbed gas stream by a physical absorption method involving solvent treatment of the gas to give a cleaned gas stream. Such processes involve contacting the scrubbed gas with a solvent such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, methyldiethanolamine, diisopropylamine, diglycolamine, a solution of sodium salts of amino acids, methanol, hot potassium carbonate or the like. One method can involve the use of Selexol® (UOP LLC, Des Plaines, Ill. USA) or Rectisol® (Lurgi AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) solvent having two trains; each train consisting of an H25 absorber and a CO2 absorber. The spent solvent(s) (607) containing H2S, CO2 and other contaminants can be regenerated by any method known to those skilled in the art, including contacting the spent solvent with steam or other stripping gas to remove the contaminants or by passing the spent solvent through stripper columns. Recovered acid gases can be sent for sulfur recovery processing; for example, any recovered H2S from the acid gas removal and sour water stripping can be converted to elemental sulfur by any method known to those skilled in the art, including the Claus process. Sulfur can be recovered as a molten liquid. Stripped water can be directed for recycled use in preparation of the first and/or particulate carbonaceous feedstock. One method for removing acid gases from the scrubbed gas stream is described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,344, entitled “SELECTIVE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF ACID GASES FROM GASIFICATION PRODUCTS”.
Advantageously, CO2 generated in the integrated process, whether in the steam generation or catalytic gasification or both, can be recovered for subsequent use or sequestration, enabling a greatly decreased carbon footprint. Steam may be generated with a reduced carbon footprint as described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,320, entitled “REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT STEAM GENERATION PROCESSES”.
The resulting cleaned gas stream (606) exiting the gas purification operation (600) contains mostly CH4, H2, and CO and, typically, small amounts of CO2 and H2O. The cleaned gas stream (606) can be further processed to separate and recover CH4 by any suitable gas separation method (900) known to those skilled in the art including, but not limited to, cryogenic distillation and the use of molecular sieves or ceramic membranes, or via the generation of methane hydrate as disclosed in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/395,330, entitled “PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE SEPARATION OF METHANE FROM A GAS STREAM”.
Typically, two gas streams can be produced by the gas separation process (900), a methane product stream (901) and a syngas stream (902, H2 and CO). The syngas stream (902) can be compressed and recycled. One option can be to recycle the syngas steam directly to the catalytic gasifier (200). In one case, the recycled syngas is combined with the exhaust gas (120) from the reactor (100), and the mixture introduced into the catalytic gasification reactor. In another case, the recycled syngas (902) can be directed into reactor (100). When a fluid bed reactor is utilized for reactor (100), the syngas may provide fluidization or aid in fluidization of the reaction bed.
If necessary, a portion of the methane product (901a) can be directed to a reformer, as discussed previously. The need to direct a portion of the methane product can be controlled, for example, by the ratio of CO to H2 in the exhaust gas from reactor (100). Particularly, methane can be directed to a reformer (1000) to supplement (1001) the exhaust gas (120) supplied to the catalytic gasification reactor and, in some instance, provide a ratio of about 3:1 of H2 to CO in the feed to the catalytic gasification reactor (200). A portion of the methane product can also be used as plant fuel for a gas turbine.
Biomass and Carbonaceous Feedstocks
The biomass feedstock supplied to the reactor (100) comprises any one or combination of biomasses. The carbonaceous feedstock may comprise any one or combination of non-biomass materials and/or any one or combination of biomass materials. Each of the biomass feedstock and carbonaceous feedstocks may comprise the same or different biomasses, when present. In one embodiment, the biomass, carbonaceous, or both feedstocks comprise biomass. In another embodiment, the carbonaceous feedstock comprises non-biomass carbonaceous material. In yet another embodiment, the carbonaceous feedstock comprises biomass and non-biomass carbonaceous material.
The biomass feedstock and carbonaceous feedstock may be supplied as a particulate. Each feedstock, independently, may have an average particle size of from about 25 microns, or from about 45 microns, up to about 500, or up to about 2500 microns. One skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate particle size for the individual particulates and the biomass feedstock and particulate carbonaceous feedstocks. For example, when a fluid bed gasification reactor is used as reactor (100) and/or gasifier (200), the biomass feedstock and/or particulate carbonaceous feedstock can have an average particle size which enables incipient fluidization of the carbonaceous feedstock at the gas velocity used in the fluid bed gasification reactor.
The term “carbonaceous material” as used herein refers to any carbonaceous material including, but not limited to biomass, coal, petroleum coke, asphaltenes, liquid petroleum residues, used motor oil and other waste processed petroleum sources, untreated or treated sewage waste, garbage, plastics, wood and other biomass, or mixtures thereof. The carbonaceous materials for the feedstock can comprise carbon sources containing at least about 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 80% carbon by dry weight.
The term “biomass” as used herein refers to carbonaceous materials derived from recently (for example, within the past 100 years) living organisms, including plant-based biomass and animal-based biomass. For clarification, biomass does not include fossil-based carbonaceous materials, such as coal.
The term “plant-based biomass” as used herein means materials derived from green plants, crops, algae, and trees, such as, but not limited to, sweet sorghum, bagasse, sugarcane, bamboo, hybrid poplar, hybrid willow, albizia trees, eucalyptus, alfalfa, clover, oil palm, switchgrass, sudangrass, millet, jatropha, and miscanthus (e.g., Miscanthus×giganteus). Biomass further include wastes from agricultural cultivation, processing, and/or degradation such as corn cobs and husks, corn stover, straw, nut shells, vegetable oils, canola oil, rapeseed oil, biodiesels, tree bark, wood chips, sawdust, and yard wastes.
The term “animal-based biomass” as used herein means wastes generated from animal cultivation and/or utilization. For example, biomass includes, but is not limited to, wastes from livestock cultivation and processing such as animal manure, guano, poultry litter, animal fats, and municipal solid wastes (e.g., sewage).
The term “non-biomass”, as used herein, means those carbonaceous materials which are not encompassed by the term “biomass” as defined herein. For example, non-biomass includes, but is not limited to, anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, lignite, petroleum coke, asphaltenes, liquid petroleum residues, or mixtures thereof.
The term “petroleum coke” as used herein includes (i) the solid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues); and (ii) the solid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands) Such carbonization products include, for example, green, calcined, needle and fluidized bed petroleum coke. Petroleum coke is generally prepared via delayed coking or fluid coking. The petroleum coke can be residual material remaining after retorting tar sands (e.g., mined) are heated to extract any oil.
Resid petcoke can also be derived from a crude oil, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity residual crude oil, which petroleum coke contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the coke. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash cokes predominantly comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.
Tar sands petcoke can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the tar sands petcoke. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash cokes predominantly comprises materials such as compounds of silicon and/or aluminum.
The petroleum coke can comprise at least about 70 wt % carbon, at least about 80 wt % carbon, or at least about 90 wt % carbon, based on the total weight of the petroleum coke. Typically, the petroleum coke comprises less than about 20 wt % percent inorganic compounds, based on the weight of the petroleum coke.
The term “liquid petroleum residue” as used herein includes both (i) the liquid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues—“resid liquid petroleum residue”) and (ii) the liquid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands—“tar sands liquid petroleum residue”). The liquid petroleum residue is substantially non-solid; for example, it can take the form of a thick fluid or a sludge.
Resid liquid petroleum residue also can be derived from a crude oil, for example, by processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity crude oil distillation residue. Such liquid petroleum residue contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the residue. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash residues predominantly comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.
Tar sands liquid petroleum residue can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands liquid petroleum residue contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the residue. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash residues predominantly comprises materials such as compounds of silicon and/or aluminum.
The term “coal” as used herein means peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, anthracite, graphite, or mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the coal has a carbon content of less than about 85%, or less than about 80%, or less than about 75%, or less than about 70%, or less than about 65%, or less than about 60%, or less than about 55%, or less than about 50% by weight, based on the total coal weight. In other embodiments, the coal has a carbon content ranging up to about 85%, or up to about 80%, or up to about 75% by weight, based on total coal weight. Examples of useful coals include, but are not limited to, Illinois #6, Pittsburgh #8, Beulah (N.D.), Utah Blind Canyon, and Powder River Basin (PRB) coals. Anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, and lignite coal may contain about 10 wt %, from about 5 to about 7 wt %, from about 4 to about 8 wt %, and from about 9 to about 11 wt %, ash by total weight of the coal on a dry basis, respectively. However, the ash content of any particular coal source will depend on the rank and source of the coal, as is familiar to those skilled in the art (see, for example, Coal Data: A Reference, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), February 1995).
Asphaltenes typically comprise aromatic carbonaceous solids at room temperature, and can be derived, from example, from the processing of crude oil, oil shale, bitumen, and tar sands.
Catalyst Components
As noted above, the carbonaceous feedstock and gasification catalyst can be introduced to gasifier (200) separately or combined as a single catalyzed feedstock. Suitable gasification catalysts include, but are not limited to, alkali metals such as lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and mixtures thereof. Particularly useful are potassium sources. Suitable alkali metal compounds include alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, formates, oxalates, amides, hydroxides, acetates, or similar compounds. For example, the catalyst can comprise one or more of Na2CO3, K2CO3, Rb2CO3, Li2CO3, Cs2CO3, NaOH, KOH, RbOH or CsOH, and particularly, potassium carbonate and/or potassium hydroxide.
The carbonaceous feedstock, in certain embodiments, further comprises an amount of an alkali metal component, as an alkali metal and/or an alkali metal compound, as well as optional co-catalysts, as disclosed in the previous incorporated references. Typically, the quantity of the alkali metal component in the composition is sufficient to provide a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms ranging from about 0.01, or from about 0.02, or from about 0.03, or from about 0.04, to about 0.06, or to about 0.07, or to about 0.08. Further, the alkali metal is typically loaded onto a biomass or carbonaceous material to achieve an alkali metal content of from about 3 to about 10 times more than the combined ash content of the biomass or carbonaceous material (e.g., coal and/or petroleum coke), on a mass basis.
Methods for Preparing Biomass Feedstock
The biomass feedstock (404) comprises a particulate composition of one or more biomasses; while the carbonaceous feedstock (405) may comprise one or more non-biomass materials, optionally in combination with one or more biomass materials (i.e., one or more carbonaceous materials) and an alkali metal gasification catalyst.
Each of the carbonaceous materials (i.e., biomass and/or non-biomass) can each be separately crushed and/or ground according to any methods known in the art in a first feedstock preparation unit (401), such as via impact crushing and wet or dry grinding to yield particulates of each. Additional feedstock processing steps may be necessary depending on the qualities of the carbonaceous materials. For example, many biomasses, such as sewage, and carbonaceous materials containing high moisture levels, such as high-moisture coals, can require drying prior to crushing. Further, some caking coals can be partially oxidized according to methods known in the art to simplify gasification reactor operation. Depending on the method utilized for crushing and/or grinding of the materials, the resulting particulates can be sized (i.e., separated according to size) to provide an appropriate feedstock.
Any method known to those skilled in the art can be used to size the particulates. For example, sizing can be preformed by screening or passing the particulates through a screen or number of screens. Screening equipment can include grizzlies, bar screens, and wire mesh screens. Screens can be static or incorporate mechanisms to shake or vibrate the screen. Alternatively, classification can be used to separate the particulates. Classification equipment can include ore sorters, gas cyclones, hydrocyclones, rake classifiers, rotating trommels, or fluidized classifiers. The carbonaceous materials can be also sized or classified prior to grinding and/or crushing.
In one example, coal is typically wet ground and sized (e.g., to a particle size distribution of about 25 to 2500 microns) and then drained of its free water (i.e., dewatered) to a wet cake consistency. Examples of suitable methods for the wet grinding, sizing, and dewatering are known to those skilled in the art; for example, see previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380.
The biomass feedstock comprises one or more types of biomass that may be blended as can be determined by one skilled in the art to provide the biomass feedstock to reactor (100) depending on the nature of reactor (100; i.e., whether it is an oxy-combustor or gasifier). In various embodiments, the biomass feedstock may comprise an aqueous slurry of the biomass particulates (supra) and can be readily prepared by adding water to the particulates before or after blending, as necessary.
The carbonaceous materials can be treated to associate at least a first catalyst (e.g., gasification catalyst) therewith, to provide the carbonaceous feedstock (405) (i.e., catalyzed feedstock) for the gasifier (200). The materials (402) prepared in first feedstock preparation unit (401) may be provided to a second feedstock preparation unit (403), either as individual streams or a previously blended stream, wherein an alkali metal catalyst may be provided to any one or more of the streams or the blended stream. Any methods known to those skilled in the art can be used to associate one or more gasification catalysts with the materials. Such methods include but are not limited to, admixing with a solid catalyst source, impregnating the catalyst onto the carbonaceous material or the biomass according to, for example, incipient wetness impregnation, evaporative impregnation, vacuum impregnation, dip impregnation, and combinations of these methods. Gasification catalysts can be impregnated by slurrying the materials with a solution (e.g., aqueous) of the catalyst.
In some cases, a second catalyst (e.g., co-catalyst) can be provided; in such instances, the particulates can be treated in separate processing steps to provide the first catalyst and second catalysts according to any of the preceding processes. For example, the primary gasification catalyst can be supplied (e.g., a potassium and/or sodium source), followed by a separate treatment to provide a co-catalyst source. Alternatively, the first and second catalysts can be provided as a mixture in a single treatment; or the first and second catalysts can be provided to separate materials and the treated materials ultimately blended.
One particular method suitable for combining coals with the gasification catalysts and optional co-catalysts is via ion exchange as described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380. Various coals deficient in ion-exchange sites can be pre-treated to create additional ion-exchange sites to facilitate catalysts loading and/or association. Such pre-treatments can be accomplished by any method known to the art that creates ion-exchange capable sites and/or enhances the porosity of a coal feed (see, for example, previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,231 and GB1599932). Often, pre-treatment is accomplished in an oxidative manner using any oxidant known to the art.
Any suitable methods known to those skilled in the art may be utilized for blending various particulates for preparing the biomass feedstock and carbonaceous feedstock. Such methods include, but are not limited to, kneading, and vertical or horizontal mixers, for example, single or twin screw, ribbon, or drum mixers.
Ultimately, the biomass feedstock and carbonaceous feedstocks may be dried, under a flow of an inert gas, with a fluid bed slurry drier (i.e., treatment with superheated steam to vaporize the liquid), or the remaining liquids evaporated to provide feedstocks having a residual moisture content of, for example, less than about 8 wt %, or less than about 6 wt %, or less than about 4 wt %.
The each of the biomass feedstocks and carbonaceous feedstocks can be stored for future use or transferred to a feed operation for introduction into the reactor (100) or gasifier (200). Each feedstock can be conveyed to storage or feed operations according to any methods known to those skilled in the art, for example, a screw conveyer or pneumatic transport.
As-received coal (Powder River Basin) can be stage-crushed to maximize the amount of material having particle sizes ranging from about 0.85 to about 1.4 mm. The crushed coal can be slurried with an aqueous solution of potassium carbonate, dewatered, and dried via a fluid bed slurry drier to yield a catalyzed feedstock.
Switchgrass can be dried and crushed to produce a particulate having an average size of about 250 microns to provide a biomass feedstock.
The switchgrass particulate of Example 1 can be provided to a combustion reactor fed by an enriched oxygen source. The resulting exhaust gas from the combustion reactor could contain hot CO2. The exhaust gas can be passed through a heat exchanger in contact with water to produce steam. The generated steam can be superheated and then introduced to a fluidized bed gasification reactor (catalytic gasifier) supplied with the catalyzed feedstock of Example 1. The catalyzed feedstock can be introduced under a positive pressure of nitrogen. Typical conditions for the catalytic gasifier could be: total pressure, 500 psi and temperature, 1200° F. The effluent of the catalytic gasifier could contain methane, CO2, H2, CO, water, H2S, ammonia, and nitrogen, which is passed to a scrubber to remove ammonia and an acid gas removal unit to remove H2S and CO2. The CO2 can be recovered.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/032,713 (filed Feb. 29, 2008), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2813126 | Tierney | Nov 1957 | A |
2886405 | Benson et al. | May 1959 | A |
3034848 | King | May 1962 | A |
3114930 | Oldham et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3164330 | Neidl | Jan 1965 | A |
3435590 | Smith | Apr 1969 | A |
3531917 | Grunewald et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3594985 | Ameen et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3615300 | Holm et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3689240 | Aldridge et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3740193 | Aldridge et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3746522 | Donath | Jul 1973 | A |
3759036 | White | Sep 1973 | A |
3779725 | Hegarty et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3814725 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3817725 | Sieg et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3828474 | Quartulli | Aug 1974 | A |
3833327 | Pitzer et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3847567 | Kalina et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3876393 | Kasai et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3904386 | Graboski et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3915670 | Lacey et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3920229 | Piggott | Nov 1975 | A |
3929431 | Koh et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3958957 | Koh et al. | May 1976 | A |
3966875 | Bratzler et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3969089 | Moss et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3972693 | Wiesner et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3975168 | Gorbaty | Aug 1976 | A |
3985519 | Kalina et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3989811 | Hill | Nov 1976 | A |
3996014 | Muller et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
3998607 | Wesswlhoft et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
3999607 | Pennington et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4005996 | Hausberger et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4011066 | Bratzler et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4021370 | Harris et al. | May 1977 | A |
4025423 | Stonner et al. | May 1977 | A |
4044098 | Miller et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4046523 | Kalina et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4052176 | Child et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4053554 | Reed et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4057512 | Vadovic et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4069304 | Starkovich et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4077778 | Nahas et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4091073 | Winkler | May 1978 | A |
4092125 | Stambaugh et al. | May 1978 | A |
4094650 | Koh et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4100256 | Bozzelli et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4101449 | Noda et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4104201 | Banks et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4113615 | Gorbaty | Sep 1978 | A |
4118204 | Eakman et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4152119 | Schulz | May 1979 | A |
4157246 | Eakman et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4159195 | Clavenna | Jun 1979 | A |
4162902 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4189307 | Marion | Feb 1980 | A |
4193771 | Sharp et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4193772 | Sharp | Mar 1980 | A |
4200439 | Lang | Apr 1980 | A |
4204843 | Neavel | May 1980 | A |
4211538 | Eakman et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4211669 | Eakman et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4219338 | Wolfs et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4225457 | Schulz | Sep 1980 | A |
4235044 | Cheung | Nov 1980 | A |
4243639 | Haas et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4249471 | Gunnerman | Feb 1981 | A |
4252771 | Lagana et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4260421 | Brown et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4265868 | Kamody | May 1981 | A |
4270937 | Adler et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4284416 | Nahas | Aug 1981 | A |
4292048 | Wesselhoft et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4298584 | Makrides | Nov 1981 | A |
4315758 | Patel et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4318712 | Lang et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322222 | Sass | Mar 1982 | A |
4330305 | Kuessner et al. | May 1982 | A |
4331451 | Isogaya et al. | May 1982 | A |
4334893 | Lang | Jun 1982 | A |
4336034 | Lang et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4336233 | Appl et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4344486 | Parrish | Aug 1982 | A |
4347063 | Sherwood et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348486 | Calvin et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4348487 | Calvin et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4353713 | Cheng | Oct 1982 | A |
4365975 | Williams et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4372755 | Tolman et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4375362 | Moss | Mar 1983 | A |
4397656 | Ketkar | Aug 1983 | A |
4400182 | Davies et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4407206 | Bartok et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4428535 | Venetucci | Jan 1984 | A |
4432773 | Euker, Jr. et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4433065 | Van der Burgt et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4436028 | Wilder | Mar 1984 | A |
4436531 | Estabrook et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4439210 | Lancet | Mar 1984 | A |
4444568 | Beisswenger et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4459138 | Soung | Jul 1984 | A |
4462814 | Holmes et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466828 | Tamai et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4468231 | Bartok et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4478725 | Velling et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482529 | Chen et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491609 | Degel et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4497784 | Diaz | Feb 1985 | A |
4500323 | Siegfried et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4505881 | Diaz | Mar 1985 | A |
4508544 | Moss | Apr 1985 | A |
4508693 | Diaz | Apr 1985 | A |
4515604 | Eisenlohr et al. | May 1985 | A |
4515764 | Diaz | May 1985 | A |
4524050 | Chen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4540681 | Kustes et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4541841 | Reinhardt | Sep 1985 | A |
4551155 | Wood et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4558027 | McKee et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4572826 | Moore | Feb 1986 | A |
4594140 | Cheng | Jun 1986 | A |
4597775 | Billimoria et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4597776 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604105 | Aquino et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609388 | Adler et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4609456 | Deschamps et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617027 | Lang | Oct 1986 | A |
4619864 | Hendrix et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4620421 | Brown et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4661237 | Kimura et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4668428 | Najjar | May 1987 | A |
4668429 | Najjar | May 1987 | A |
4675035 | Apffel | Jun 1987 | A |
4678480 | Heinrich et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682986 | Lee et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4690814 | Velenyi et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4704136 | Weston et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720289 | Vaugh et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4747938 | Khan | May 1988 | A |
4781731 | Schlinger | Nov 1988 | A |
4785746 | Roy et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4803061 | Najjar et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808194 | Najjar et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4810475 | Chu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822935 | Scott | Apr 1989 | A |
4848983 | Tomita et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854944 | Strong | Aug 1989 | A |
4861346 | Najjar et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4861360 | Apffel | Aug 1989 | A |
4872886 | Henley et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876080 | Paulson | Oct 1989 | A |
4892567 | Yan | Jan 1990 | A |
4960450 | Schwarz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4995193 | Soga et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5017282 | Delbianco et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055181 | Maa et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057294 | Sheth et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059406 | Sheth et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5093094 | Van Kleeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5094737 | Bearden, Jr. et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5132007 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5223173 | Jeffrey | Jun 1993 | A |
5236557 | Muller et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250083 | Wolfenbarger et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5277884 | Shinnar et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5435940 | Doering et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5536893 | Gudmundsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5616154 | Elliott et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630854 | Sealock, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5641327 | Leas | Jun 1997 | A |
5660807 | Forg et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670122 | Zamansky et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5720785 | Baker | Feb 1998 | A |
5733515 | Doughty et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5776212 | Leas | Jul 1998 | A |
5788724 | Carugati et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5855631 | Leas | Jan 1999 | A |
5865898 | Holtzapple et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5968465 | Koveal et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6013158 | Wootten | Jan 2000 | A |
6015104 | Rich, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028234 | Heinemann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6090356 | Jahnke et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6132478 | Tsurui et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6180843 | Heinemann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187465 | Galloway | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6379645 | Bucci et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389820 | Rogers et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6506349 | Khanmamedov | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506361 | Machado et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6602326 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6641625 | Clawson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653516 | Yoshikawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6692711 | Alexion et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6790430 | Lackner et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797253 | Lyon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808543 | Paisley | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6855852 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6878358 | Vosteen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894183 | Choudhary et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6955695 | Nahas | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969494 | Herbst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7074373 | Warren et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7132183 | Galloway | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7205448 | Gajda et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220502 | Galloway | May 2007 | B2 |
7309383 | Beech, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7897126 | Rappas et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7901644 | Rappas et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922782 | Sheth | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926750 | Hauserman | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7976593 | Graham | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20020036086 | Minkkinen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030131582 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167691 | Nahas | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040020123 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055716 | Landalv et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040123601 | Fan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180971 | Inoue et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050107648 | Kimura et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137442 | Gajda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050274113 | Sekiai et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287056 | Baker et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060265953 | Hobbs | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070000177 | Hippo et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070051043 | Schingnitz | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083072 | Nahas | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070180990 | Downs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186472 | Rabovitser et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237696 | Payton | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070277437 | Sheth | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282018 | Jenkins | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090048476 | Rappas et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090090055 | Ohtsuka | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090090056 | Ohtsuka | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090139851 | Freel | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165361 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165376 | Lau et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165379 | Rappas | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165380 | Lau et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165381 | Robinson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165382 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165383 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165384 | Lau et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090166588 | Spitz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090169448 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090169449 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090170968 | Nahas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173079 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217575 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217582 | May et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217584 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217585 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217586 | Rappas et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217587 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217588 | Hippo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217589 | Robinson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217590 | Rappas et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090218424 | Hauserman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090220406 | Rahman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229182 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090246120 | Raman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259080 | Raman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260287 | Lau | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090324458 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324459 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324460 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324461 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324462 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100071235 | Pan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071262 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076235 | Reiling et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100120926 | Robinson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121125 | Hippo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168494 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168495 | Rappas et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179232 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287835 | Reiling et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287836 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292350 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110031439 | Sirdeshpande et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110062012 | Robinson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062721 | Sirdeshpande et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062722 | Sirdeshpande et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064648 | Preston et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088896 | Preston | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088897 | Raman | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110146978 | Perlman | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146979 | Wallace | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
966660 | Apr 1975 | CA |
1003217 | Jan 1977 | CA |
1106178 | Aug 1981 | CA |
1 125 026 | Jun 1982 | CA |
1187702 | Jun 1985 | CA |
1477090 | Feb 2004 | CN |
2 210 891 | Mar 1972 | DE |
2210891 | Sep 1972 | DE |
2852710 | Jun 1980 | DE |
3422202 | Dec 1985 | DE |
100610607 | Jun 2002 | DE |
819 | Apr 2000 | EA |
0024792 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0 067 580 | Dec 1982 | EP |
102828 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0 138 463 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0 225 146 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0 259 927 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 723 930 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1 001 002 | May 2000 | EP |
1 207 132 | May 2002 | EP |
1 741 673 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2058471 | May 2009 | EP |
797 089 | Apr 1936 | FR |
2 478 615 | Sep 1981 | FR |
2906879 | Apr 2008 | FR |
593910 | Oct 1947 | GB |
640907 | Aug 1950 | GB |
676615 | Jul 1952 | GB |
701 131 | Dec 1953 | GB |
760627 | Nov 1956 | GB |
798741 | Jul 1958 | GB |
820 257 | Sep 1959 | GB |
996327 | Jun 1965 | GB |
1033764 | Jun 1966 | GB |
1448562 | Sep 1976 | GB |
1453081 | Oct 1976 | GB |
1467219 | Mar 1977 | GB |
1467995 | Mar 1977 | GB |
1 599 932 | Jul 1977 | GB |
2078251 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2154600 | Sep 1985 | GB |
2455864 | Jun 2009 | GB |
54020003 | Feb 1979 | JP |
56157493 | Dec 1981 | JP |
62241991 | Oct 1987 | JP |
62 257985 | Nov 1987 | JP |
2000290659 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000290670 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002105467 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2004292200 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004298818 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2006 169476 | Jun 2006 | JP |
0018681 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0043468 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0240768 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02079355 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02103157 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03018958 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03033624 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004055323 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004072210 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2006031011 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2007005284 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007047210 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007068682 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007077137 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007077138 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007083072 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076363 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007128370 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007143376 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007143376 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008058636 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008073889 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008087154 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009018053 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009018053 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009048723 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009048724 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086361 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086362 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086363 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086366 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086367 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086370 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086372 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086374 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086377 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086383 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086407 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086408 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009111330 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009111331 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009111332 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009111335 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009111342 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009111345 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009124017 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009124019 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158576 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158579 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158580 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158582 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158583 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010033846 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010033848 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010033850 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010033852 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010048493 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010078297 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010078298 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011029278 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029282 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029283 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029284 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029285 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011063608 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Asami, K., et al., “Highly Active Iron Catalysts from Ferric Chloride or the Steam Gasification of Brown Coal,” ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 32, No. 8, 1993, pp. 1631-1636. |
Berger, R., et al., “High Temperature CO2-Absorption: A Process Offering New Prospects in Fuel Chemistry,” The Fifth International Symposium on Coal Combustion, Nov. 2003, Nanjing, China, pp. 547-549. |
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” Aug. 2005. |
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” DOE Hydrogen Program Contractors' Review Metting, Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Iowa State University, May 21, 2003. |
Coal Conversion Processes (Gasification), Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, vol. 6, pp. 541-566. |
Cohen, S.J., Project Manager, “Large Pilot Plant Alternatives for Scaleup of the Catalytic Coal Gasification Process,” FE-2480-20, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No., Ex-76-C-01-2480, 1979. |
Euker, Jr., C.A., Reitz, R.A., Program Managers, “Exxon Catalytic Coal-Gasification-Process Development Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2777-31, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. ET-78-C-01-2777, 1981. |
Kalina, T., Nahas, N.C., Project Managers, “Exxon Catalaytic Coal Gasification Process Predevelopment Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2369-24, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No., E(49-18)-2369, 1978. |
Nahas, N.C., “Exxon Catalytic Coal Gasification Process—Fundamentals to Flowsheets,” Fuel, vol. 62, No. 2, 1983, pp. 239-241. |
Ohtsuka, Y. et al., “Highly Active Catalysts from Inexpensive Raw Materials for Coal Gasification,” Catalysis Today, vol. 39, 1997, pp. 111-125. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al, “Steam Gasification of Low-Rank Coals with a Chlorine-Free Iron Catalyst from Ferric Chloride,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 30, No. 8, 1991, pp. 1921-1926. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Calcium Catalysed Steam Gasification of Yalourn Brown Coal,” Fuel, vol. 65, 1986, pp. 1653-1657. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al, “Iron-Catalyzed Gasification of Brown Coal at Low Temperatures,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 1, No. 1, 1987, pp. 32-36. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al., “Ion-Exchanged Calcium From Calcium Carbonate and Low-Rank Coals: High Catalytic Activity in Steam Gasification,” Energy & Fuels 1996, 10, pp. 431-435. |
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Steam Gasification of Coals with Calcium Hydroxide,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 9, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1038-1042. |
Pereira, P., et al., “Catalytic Steam Gasification of Coals,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 6, No. 4, 1992, pp. 407-410. |
Ruan Xiang-Quan, et al., “Effects of Catalysis on Gasification of Tatong Coal Char,” Fuel, vol. 66, Apr. 1987, pp. 568-571. |
Tandon, D., “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal,” College of Engineering in the Graduate School, Southern Illinois university at Carbondale, Jun. 1996. |
“Integrate Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC),” WorleyParsons Resources & Energy, http://www.worleyparsons.com/v5/page.aspx?id=164. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,538, filled May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,548, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,552, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al. |
Adsorption, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adsorption, pp. 1-8. |
Amine gas treating, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid—gas—removal, pp. 1-4. |
Coal, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal—gasification, pp. 1-8. |
Coal Data: A Reference, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), Feb. 1995. |
Deepak Tandon, Dissertation Approval, “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal”, Jun. 13, 1996. |
Demibras, “Demineralization of Agricultural Residues by Water Leaching”, Energy Sources, vol. 25, pp. 679-687, (2003). |
Fluidized Bed Gasifiers, http://www.energyproducts.com/fluidized—bed—gasifiers.htm, pp. 1-5. |
Gas separation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas—separation, pp. 1-2. |
Gasification, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasification, pp. 1-6. |
Gallagher Jr., et al., “Catalytic Coal Gasification for SNG Manufacture”, Energy Research, vol. 4, pp. 137-147, (1980). |
Heinemann, et al., “Fundamental and Exploratory Studies of Catalytic Steam Gasification of Carbonaceous Materials”, Final Report Fiscal Years 1985-1994. |
Jensen, et al. Removal of K and C1 by leaching of straw char, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 20, pp. 447-457, (2001). |
Mengjie, et al., “A potential renewable energy resource development and utilization of biomass energy”, http://www.fao.org.docrep/T4470E/t4470e0n.htm, pp. 1-8. |
Meyers, et al. Fly Ash as a Construction Material for Highways, A Manual. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, DC, 1976. |
Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag”, Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, DC, 1973. |
Natural gas processing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural—gas—processing, pp. 1-4. |
Natural Gas Processing: The Crucial Link Between Natural Gas Production and Its Transportation to Market. Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas; pp. 1-11, (2006). |
Prins, et al., “Exergetic optimisation of a production process of Fischer-Tropsch fuels from biomass”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 86, pp. 375-389, (2004). |
Reboiler, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboiler, pp. 1-4. |
What is XPS?, http://www.nuance.northwestern.edu/Keckll/xps1.asp, pp. 1-2. |
2. 3 Types of gasifiers, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0a.htm, pp. 1-6. |
2.4 Gasification fuels http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0b.htm#TopofPage, pp. 1-8. |
2.5 Design of downdraught gasifiers, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0c.htm#TopOfPage, pp. 1-8. |
2.6 Gas cleaning and cooling, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e0d.htm#TopOFPage, pp. 1-3. |
A.G. Collot et al., “Co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of coal and biomass in bench-scale fixed-bed and fluidized bed reactors”, (1999) Fuel 78, pp. 667-679. |
Wenkui Zhu et al., “Catalytic gasification of char from co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass”, (2008) Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 89, pp. 890-896. |
Chiesa P. et al., “Co-Production of hydrogen, electricity and C02 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions”, (2005) International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 747-767. |
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier”, DOE Hydrogen Program Contractors' Review meeting, May 18-21, 2003, Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies Iowa State University. |
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a thermally Ballasted Gasifier”, Final Technical Report, Iowa State University, Aug. 2005. |
Chiaramonte et al, “Upgrade Coke by Gasification”, (1982) Hydrocarbon Processing, vol. 61 (9), pp. 255-257 (Abstract only). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090217584 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61032713 | Feb 2008 | US |