The invention relates to steam irons, and more in particular to the control of steaming functions of such irons.
A domestic steam iron has the capability to generate steam and to subsequently release this steam through outlet openings provided in the soleplate of the iron. The steam, which is applied directly to a garment being ironed, helps to diminish the ironing effort and to improve the ironing result.
Modern steam irons may come equipped with a steam rate control, for example in the form of a turnable knob or a slider provided on the iron housing. While a low steam rate setting may suffice for efficiently ironing moderately creased clothes (or patches thereof), a high steam rate setting may be selected to aid in the removal of tough wrinkles. The control allows the user at any time to select the steam rate setting that is appropriate for the (patch of) garment at hand. Practice shows, however, that some if not most users do not bother to adjust the steam rate once they have started an ironing session. Accordingly, when the maximum steam rate has been selected initially, the iron may remain set to produce larger amounts of steam than necessary for achieving a proper ironing result. Moreover, many users tend to park an iron horizontally between different ironing strokes, e.g. during garment changing or rearrangement, which results in continuation of maximum steam production during idle time.
In an attempt to put a curb on the energy wastage that is associated with such use of a steam iron, it has been suggested to fit the iron with an intuitively operated handle that controls the steam rate. See for an example of such an iron FR602293. The working of an intuitive handle may rely on the downward force that is exerted by a user's hand as he steers the iron across a garment. In general, a user will intuitively apply a larger downward force on the handle as the degree of wrinkling in a garment increases. The applied force may thus be taken as a measure of the desired steam rate. When no force is applied, for example when the iron is parked on an iron rest, the production and/or release of steam may be halted.
Although the intuitive handle seems to provide a solution to the problem of energy wastage due to unnecessary steam production, research has shown that the range of forces exerted on a handle by an ironing user varies per individual. This means, inter alia, that the minimum force that is applied during an ironing session is individual-dependent. In addition, individual users do not display consistent force-exertion behaviour across different ironing sessions either. As an intuitive handle has a minimum force threshold that must be exceeded in order to activate it, users of an iron with such a handle may not, or not at all times, automatically apply sufficient force on the handle to bring about the release of steam. Furthermore, even though the handle may thus work unsatisfactorily, it may not be possible to put the handle out of action or to override it, and to specify the desired steam rate in a different manner.
It is an object of the present invention to provide for a steam iron that overcomes or mitigates one or more of the above-described problems.
To this end, a steam iron is provided that includes a handle, moveable between a first handle position and a second handle position, whereby a biasing mechanism is provided to bias the handle into the first handle position. The steam iron also includes a user-control, adjustable between a first state and a second state, and a steam rate control assembly, operatively connected to the handle and the user-control, and configured to set a steam rate of the steam iron. The steam rate control assembly is configured such that the steam rate is set based on the user-control, irrespective of the position of the handle, when the user-control is in the first state; and such that the steam rate is set based on at least a position of the handle when the user-control is in the second state.
A steam iron according to the present invention provides a bipartite steam rate control, based on the synergetic combination of the two controls discussed above: a user-control, which allows a user to consciously set a desired steam rate, and an intuitively operated handle, which may conditionally provide the steam rate control assembly with corrective, energy saving input. Advantageously, the user-control enables the user to put the intuitive handle out of action in case it does not function satisfactorily, e.g. when ironing only mildly creased clothes, or in case its operation is not required, e.g. when no steaming is desired at all. Depending on the desired functionality, the first state of the user-control may comprise two or more selectable user-control positions, each of which may be associated with its own steam rate. The more first-state user-control positions, the wider the choice available to the user to unambiguously select the desired steam rate, independent of the handle position.
In an advantageous embodiment, the steam rate control assembly is configured such that a steam rate that is set when the user-control is in its first state is smaller than a steam rate that is set when the user-control is in its second state.
That is to say, the first state of the user-control corresponds to one or more relatively low steam rates, while the second state of the user-control corresponds to one or more medium or high steam rates. Since the user-control is operated consciously, a user may determine whether he desires a low or a high steam rate. When a low steam rate is selected, the iron's energy consumption is moderate, and there is little need for corrective, energy saving input from the intuitive handle. Besides, the selection of a low steam rate indicates that only mildly creased garments are being ironed, such that the force that is intuitively exerted on the handle might easily be too small to activate it anyway. When the need for energy saving action arises, however, i.e. when a medium or high steam rate is selected, the steam rate control assembly will automatically involve input from the intuitive handle in setting the steam rate. As the conscious selection of a high steam rate indicates that more heavily wrinkled garments are being ironed, the force exerted on the intuitive handle will typically suffice to activate it.
The arrangement may be such that the user-control is primarily concerned with the selection a desired base steam rate. When the steam rate set by the user-control exceeds a certain threshold, whereby the user-control passes into its second state, the base steam rate may be fixed at the threshold value and the intuitive handle may be put in action to provide an extra dosage of steam in dependence of the force exerted thereon. Release of the handle will then ensure a return to the base steam rate to save energy.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of certain embodiments of the invention, taken together with the accompanying drawings, which are meant to illustrate and not to limit the invention.
Steam iron 1 comprises a housing 2 that is fitted with an intuitively operated handle 4. Handle 4 is pivotable between a first, elevated position and a second, lower position around a hinge 6 that connects the handle 4 to the housing 2. In
Although
Attention is now invited to the construction and operation of the steam rate control assembly 30. The construction of the steam rate control assembly 30 will be described first with reference to
Referring primarily to
The switch 42 comprises a selector pin 44, a guide slit 46 and a spring-loaded switch body 48. The selector pin 44 may be operatively connected to a user-control that is accessible from the outside of the housing 2 of the steam iron 1. Said user-control may take any suitable form, and for example be a turnable knob, a dial, a slider, etc. Alternatively, when the selector pin 44 is itself suitably shaped and positioned, the selector pin 44 may be identified with a user-control. The selector pin 44 is slideably moveable within the guide slit 46 that is provided in the support structure 31. The guide slit 46 extends slantingly upwards, as can be best seen in
The lever 34 comprises a lever effect end 36, a lever load end 40 and a lever fulcrum 38. The lever effect end 36 is operably connected to the intuitive handle 4, either directly or through the intermediation of an optional link mechanism. The connection is such that a downward movement of the handle 4 towards its second, lower position corresponds to a clockwise rotation of the lever 34 around the fulcrum 38. It is understood that the clockwise rotation of the lever 34 involves the lifting of the lever load end 40. When no downward force is exerted on the handle 4, the biasing mechanism 8 will force the handle 4 into its first, elevated position such that the lever 34 is rotated in a counter-clockwise direction and the lever load end 40 is lowered. The counter-clockwise rotation of the lever 34 may be halted when the handle 4 reaches its first position or when the lever effect end 36 contacts a stop 62 provided by the support structure 31. The lever load end 40 may interact with the steam shaft bracket 56 at the stop 57 provided thereon. Contact with the stop 57, however, will not halt a counter-clockwise rotation of the lever as the biasing mechanism 8 is configured to overcome the spring action of spring 60.
With regard to the terminology, it is noted that the positions of the selector pin 44 that effect a situation wherein the upward motion of the steam shaft bracket 56 is restricted by the switch body 48, and not by the lever load end 36 in its lowest position, may define the first state of the user-control. Any position of the selector pin 44 that effects a situation wherein the lever load end 36 in its lowest position restricts the upward motion of the steam shaft bracket 56, on the other hand, corresponds to a user-control in its second state.
In
Departing from the situation shown in
At some point, the sliding selector pin 44 will effect a situation wherein the steam shaft bracket 56 touches the lever load end 40 at stop 57, and loses contact with the arm 49 at its top end. From that point on, the upward movement of the steam shaft 58 is no longer restricted by the switch body 48, but by the lever 34. Accordingly, it is the position of the intuitive handle 4, which is operably connected to the lever 34, that determines whether the steam rate is increased any further or not. This situation, which is depicted in
The steam rate control assembly 30 shown in
By way of example a number of embodiments of a steam rate control assembly featuring electric components will be described briefly. In one embodiment the steam rate control assembly may comprise an electric pump by means of which a water flow rate in the water channel 10 (see
Alternatively, the flow rate setting of the electric pump may be controlled electronically, for example by means of a certain electric signal having a variable voltage or frequency. In that case, the steam rate control assembly may comprise an electronic control unit, e.g. a processor. In addition, the user-control may be an electric control, e.g. an electronic switch, and the handle 4 may be fitted with a displacement sensor or a force sensor to register the displacement of or the force exerted on the handle. In an advantageous embodiment, the electronic control unit may be programmable by the user, such that the user may for example set the steam rates associated with different positions of the user-control precisely as desired. —It is noted that the electric pump, like the water reservoir 12, need not to be integrated into the housing 2 of the iron, but may be disposed external thereto instead.
Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these embodiments. Variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, it is noted that the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09151540 | Jan 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2010/050057 | 1/8/2010 | WO | 00 | 7/7/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/086756 | 8/5/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1365186 | Oca Balda | Jan 1921 | A |
2418511 | Hume | Apr 1947 | A |
2427474 | Purpura | Sep 1947 | A |
2664653 | Voskresenski | Jan 1954 | A |
2674054 | Maykemper | Apr 1954 | A |
2708801 | Voskresenski | May 1955 | A |
2741044 | Maykemper | Apr 1956 | A |
3224122 | Jepson et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3986282 | Nelson | Oct 1976 | A |
5136796 | Farrington | Aug 1992 | A |
6935056 | Milanese | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7469492 | You | Dec 2008 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0315915 | May 1989 | EP |
602293 | Mar 1926 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110271565 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |