This application is based upon and claims the benefits of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-168942, filed on Jun. 27, 2007; the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to an intermediate support structure for holding a row of long moving blades in a steam turbine. More particularly, the invention relates to an intermediate support structure for holding rows of long moving blades in low-pressure stage of a steam turbine, and relates to a steam turbine.
In a typical steam turbine, the moving blade rows are arranged peripherally and planted on the outer circumferential surface of the turbine rotor. The stationary blade rows are secured to the turbine casing. The moving blade rows and the stationary blade rows are alternately arranged in the axial direction of the turbine rotor. One moving blade row and one stationary blade row (called “nozzles”) make a blade row pair, which is known as “a stage.” The stages are axially arranged, constituting the turbine. As fluid flows through the gap between the blades of every stage, the turbine rotor rotates.
Thus, the moving blades of the steam turbine convert the energy of steam to a mechanical rotational force, which is transmitted to the turbine rotor. Steam at high temperature and high pressure gradually expands, flowing through the stages, each composed of moving blades and nozzles, and exerting a rotational force to each moving blade.
The moving blades are planted on the turbine rotor, and the turbine rotor rotates at high speed. A large centrifugal force and rotational vibration are inevitably applied, particularly, to the long moving blades that are used in the low-pressure stages of the steam turbine. In addition, the rows of long moving blades are important components because they significantly affect the efficiency of the entire turbine, the output power of the turbine and the size of the plant including the turbine. Hence, it is important to make sure that the rows of long moving blades have an appropriate strength in the process of designing the steam turbine.
To reinforce the rows of long moving blades, making them strong enough to withstand the above-mentioned large centrifugal force and rotational vibration, intermediate support members, such as tie wires or lugs, have hitherto been used, coupling the moving blades to one another in peripheral direction. The moving blade rows are thereby reinforced (see Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication Nos. 06-248902 and 06-010613, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.).
As shown in
The present invention has been made to solve the problems specified above. An object of the invention is to provide a steam turbine in which intermediate support members couple the moving blades to one another, preventing the main steam flow from separating, thereby reducing the fluid loss, while keeping the rows of moving blades having a large strength.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a row of moving blades for a steam turbine, the row comprising: a plurality of moving blades elongated radially, and arranged peripherally around and secured to a turbine rotor; and an intermediate support structure for holding the blades each other at a radially intermediate position, the intermediate support structure having a shape of streamline cross section.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a steam turbine comprising at least one row of moving blades described above.
The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the discussion hereinbelow of specific, illustrative embodiments thereof presented in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Embodiments of an intermediate support structure for holding a row of long moving blades in a steam turbine according to the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
A first embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to
In the first embodiment, the long moving blades 1 used in the low-pressure stage of the steam turbine have a planted part 2 each. The planted part 2 is embedded in the turbine rotor 9 (
A lug 6 having a streamline cross section is formed on the radially middle part of each moving blade 1. The lug 6 protrudes from the surface of the moving blade 1. The lugs 6 of the mutually adjacent moving blades protrude toward each other and are coupled to each other by welding, for example. The lugs 6 are intermediate support members that reinforce the moving blades 1, making the blades 1 strong enough to withstand a centrifugal force and vibration the blades 1 may receive while the turbine rotor 9 is rotating. Thus, a plurality of the moving blades are coupled together, forming one or more groups of the moving blades arranged in a row.
The flow-guiding characteristic of the lug 6 having a streamline cross section will be explained, in comparison with that of the conventional lug.
With reference to
In the first embodiment so configured as described above, the main steam flow that passes the lug 6 each does not separate because the lug 6 coupling two adjacent blades 1 has a streamline cross section. No large vortexes therefore develop in the wake at the rear of the streamline-shaped lug 6. Thus, the speed-loss region in the wake is small, decreasing the fluid loss. The present embodiment can therefore provide a steam turbine having strong moving blade rows, in which the moving blades do not vibrate.
In the embodiment described above, the streamline-shaped lugs 6 are used as intermediate support members. The streamline-shaped lugs 6 may be replaced by a streamline-shaped tie wire 4 which is shown in
A second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to
In the second embodiment, the streamline-shaped lugs 6 are not directly coupled to one another as in the first embodiment. Instead, lugs 3 of two adjacent moving blades 1 are coupled to each other via an intermediate member such as a streamline-shaped sleeve 7. Two lugs 3 protruding from the two associated blades 1, respectively, and one streamline-shaped sleeve 7 constitute a “lug-sleeve” unit. Since the sleeve 7 of each lug-sleeve unit has a streamline cross section, the fluid loss can be greatly reduced in the second embodiment. The fluid loss can be reduced still more if the lugs 3 have a streamline cross section as the lugs 6 used in the first embodiment.
The second embodiment thus configured can achieve the same advantages as the first embodiment. Further, the intermediate support members can be attached more easily than in the first embodiment, because they are lug-sleeve units. Moreover, the components that greatly influence the fluid loss are shaped in streamlines, which helps to lower the manufacturing cost of the turbine, while successfully decreasing the aerodynamic loss.
A third embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to
In the third embodiment, the streamline cross section of each intermediate support member is changed in shape in accordance with the incidence angle of the main stream flow 20.
The angle at which the main steam flow comes to each moving blade of the steam turbine largely depends on the change in the plant output power. In a steam turbine driven always at its rated condition (i.e., at 100% load), the incidence angle of the upstream main stream flow 20 is relatively constant, changing only a little. In any steam turbine installed in a plant in which the load is frequently adjusted, however, the incidence angle of the upstream main stream flow 20 greatly changes.
In a steam turbine installed in a plant the output power of which does not change much, acute-angle, streamline-shaped lugs 6a of the type shown in
By contrast, in a steam turbine installed in a plant the output power of which changes much, the angle of incidence of the main steam flow may be larger than the angle at which the intermediate support members are attached. In this case, the intermediate support members will increase the fluid loss if they are acute-angle, streamline-shaped lugs. Therefore, in a steam turbine installed in a plant the load of which is frequently adjusted, obtuse-angle streamline-shaped lugs 6b of the type shown in
The term “obtuse-angle, streamline-shaped lug” means a lug whose head part (or most upstream part), which receives the main steam flow, has a substantially circular cross section, and whose tail part is streamline-shaped and smoothly continuous to the head part. The head part of the lug may have an elliptical cross section, not a circular cross section. If its cross section is circular, the cross section has a diameter equal to the maximum thickness Tmax of the lug. If its cross section is elliptical, the minor or major axis is the maximum thickness Tmax.
In the third embodiment thus configured, if the main stream flow 20 is stable in direction, intermediate support members having an acute-angle, streamline cross section are used, preventing the main steam flow from flow separation and ultimately maintaining the fluid loss at a small value. If the main stream flow 20 greatly changes in direction, intermediate support members having an obtuse-angle streamline cross section are used, reducing flow separation regions in size and ultimately maintaining the fluid loss at a small value.
The embodiments explained above are merely examples, and the present invention is not restricted thereto. It is, therefore, to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the present invention can be practiced in a manner other than as specifically described herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007-168942 | Jun 2007 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
791837 | Sweet | Jun 1905 | A |
937006 | Mckee | Oct 1909 | A |
1698327 | Doran | Jan 1929 | A |
2082914 | Soderberg | Jun 1937 | A |
2198784 | Mikina | Apr 1940 | A |
2245237 | Truex | Jun 1941 | A |
2278040 | Allen | Mar 1942 | A |
2454115 | Allen | Nov 1948 | A |
2472886 | Conrad et al. | Jun 1949 | A |
2772854 | Anxionnaz | Dec 1956 | A |
3327995 | Blackhurst et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3612718 | Palfreyman et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3795462 | Trumpler, Jr. | Mar 1974 | A |
4083655 | Tempere | Apr 1978 | A |
4257743 | Fujii | Mar 1981 | A |
4722668 | Novacek | Feb 1988 | A |
4734010 | Battig | Mar 1988 | A |
RE32737 | Ortolano | Aug 1988 | E |
5275531 | Roberts | Jan 1994 | A |
5393200 | Dinh et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5460488 | Spear et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5498136 | Namura et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5695323 | Pfeifer et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2851582 | Dec 2006 | CN |
2 264 446 | Sep 1993 | GB |
6-010613 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-248902 | Sep 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090004011 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |