The invention relates generally to steam turbines and, more particularly, to an inner shell assembly for a steam turbine including common grooves to facilitate inner shell manufacture.
A steam turbine is a mechanical device that extracts energy from pressurized steam and converts the energy into useful work. Steam turbines receive a steam flow at an inlet pressure through multiple stationary nozzles that direct the steam flow against buckets rotationally attached to a rotor of the turbine. The steam flow impinging on the buckets creates a torque that causes the rotor of the turbine to rotate, thereby creating a useful source of power for turning an electrical generator or other mechanical device. The steam turbine includes, along the length of the rotor, multiple pairs of nozzles (or fixed blades) and buckets. Each pair of nozzle and bucket is called a stage. Each stage extracts a certain amount of energy from the steam flow causing the steam pressure and temperature to drop and the specific volume of the steam flow to expand. Consequently, the size of the nozzles and the buckets (stages) and their distance from the rotor grow progressively larger in the later stages.
Steam turbine customers require unique steam turbine designs that are optimized for the customer's plant and yield economically appropriate delivery, cost, performance, reliability, availability, and maintainability. Historically, this customer need has been met by supplying steam turbine steam paths that are unique to the customer's plant. In the past, the inner shells, carriers, and other components were designed specifically for each steam path. This approach led to longer design and procurement cycles for large components such as the shells and inner casings, the proliferation of shell and inner casing designs, and the inability to inventory common or spare components to support customer demand.
It would be desirable to provide a modular, flexible, common steam turbine shell/inner casing design that will accommodate a wide range of steam paths. Such structure would serve to reduce the need to provide multiple designs for steam turbine shell/inner casings designs and provide for a dramatic decrease in the time needed to design and procure steam turbine shells/inner casings. Additionally, such structure would facilitate the ability to carry shell and inner casing inventory to further expedite the turbine delivery cycle.
In an exemplary embodiment, an inner shell assembly for a steam turbine includes an inner shell with a plurality of grooves of preset dimensions, and a plurality of nozzle carriers respectively securable in the plurality of grooves. Each of the nozzle carriers supports at least one nozzle and bucket for a turbine stage via a dovetail, where the inner shell, the plurality of nozzle carriers and the nozzles and buckets define a steam path. A radial position of the dovetails in the nozzle carriers within its corresponding grooves is selectable according to the steam path, and an axial width of each of the nozzle carriers is selectable according to the steam path.
In another exemplary embodiment, a steam turbine includes an outer shell and an inner shell assembly defining a steam flow path, and a rotor and a stator disposed in the steam flow path. A plurality of stationary nozzles is coupled with the stator that direct steam in the steam flow path into a plurality of rotatable buckets coupled with the rotor. The inner shell assembly includes an inner shell including a plurality of grooves of preset dimensions, and a plurality of nozzle carriers respectively securable in the plurality of grooves. Each of the nozzle carriers supports at least one nozzle for a turbine stage. A radial position of the nozzles within the nozzle carriers in the corresponding grooves is selectable according to the steam path, and an axial width of each of the nozzle carriers is selectable according to the steam path.
In still another exemplary embodiment, a method of forming a steam path with an inner shell assembly in a steam turbine includes the steps of forming a plurality of grooves of preset dimensions in an inner shell; respectively securing a plurality of nozzle carriers in the plurality of grooves, each of the nozzle carriers supporting at least one nozzle for a turbine stage. The securing step is practiced by (1) selecting an axial width of each of the nozzle carriers according to the steam path, and (2) selecting a radial position of the at least one nozzle in the nozzle carriers in the corresponding grooves according to the steam path.
There are five grooves 16 shown in
The groove design can be standard for all the grooves in the shell/inner casing 14. That is, the preset dimensions of the grooves 16 can be determined prior to defining the customer-specific steam path. In one embodiment, the axial widths of each of the plurality of grooves are equivalent, and the radial depths of each of the plurality of grooves are equivalent. In this manner, tooling and hardware requirements for constructing the inner shell 14 are simplified. The grooves 16 use the same vertical transverse and torsional support and alignment provisions and nozzle carrier to shell/inner casing interface.
In designing the assembly, the steam turbine design space to be served is determined. Plural steam paths are designed to cover the design space (shortest largest tip diameter and longest smallest tip diameter). The steam turbine section is designed to accommodate these two bounding steam paths including rotor dynamics, thrust clearances, steam path mechanical seals, etc. The grooves are then designed in their radial and axial extent. Once completed, the customer-specific steam path can be uniquely defined within the design space.
The nozzle carriers 18 may be equally sized in some arrangements or alternatively may be sized differently to accommodate the desired steam path. The nozzle carriers 18 are used to match the different steam paths to the common grooving of the inner shell.
The location of the nozzle split 22 is determined when the final customer steam path is laid out. In general, a split location as far upstream as possible is preferable so pressure closes the horizontal joint. Other factors that may influence its location are stage spacing, rotor weld locations, or sealing requirements.
The axial locations of the nozzle carrier splits 22 can also be adjusted to accommodate steam extraction or admission pressures.
With reference to
The axial distribution of shell/inner casing inside surface pressure and temperature can be adjusted by locating the nozzle carrier splits 22 at different axial locations. This adjustment capability facilitates the ability to design shell/inner casing wall and flange thickness, bolting and design to prevent horizontal joint leakage.
One anticipated issue with this concept is the relative change in size between rotor and stator components as design firing level increases. As design volume flow increases, the steam path annulus also increases, resulting in a larger diameter rotor and nozzle carriers with larger inner diameters. The larger inner diameter of the nozzle carriers results in thinner rings as design flow increases.
The differences in carrier size and rotor size mean that thermal response may be different throughout the design space. The thick carriers will be slower to respond to steam temperature changes than the thin carriers. Likewise, the small diameter rotor will respond more rapidly to steam temperature changes than the large diameter rotor. Since clearances are set to avoid or minimize rubs during transient operation, this affects the clearances. Some means of matching the transient response of rotor and stator, or at least minimizing the variation across the design space, may be desirable.
Little can be done to change the thermal response of the rotor, as rotor life, structural integrity, and dynamic response are important requirements that constrain the rotor design space and dictate rotor design. Attention, then, turns to the stator components, primarily the nozzle carrier. Active cooling or heating of the nozzle carrier is possible, and could be used to control the carrier growth during transient operation. This, however, would necessitate the creation of flow circuits for heating/cooling. In addition, this approach would either result in performance loss due to the use of steam for clearance control or the additions of valves, piping, and control system logic to limit active control use to transient operation.
Another approach is to tune the design of the nozzle carriers to achieve the desired thermal response. This can be done in two ways: 1) reduce the mass of the small inside diameter nozzle carriers, and 2) increase the heat transfer to the nozzle carriers.
With reference to
In
Another approach is to apply heat transfer enhancement features 70 on the surfaces shown in
The inner shell with common grooving and nozzle carriers to cover large steam turbine design spaces facilitates inner shell manufacturing requirements while providing the ability to use the shells, inner casings and nozzle carriers to accommodate a wide range of steam paths. The common grooving reduces the need for multiple steam turbine shell and inner casing designs, provides for a dramatic decrease in the time needed to design and procure steam turbine shells and inner casings, and affords the ability to carry shell and inner casings in inventory to further expedite turbine delivery cycles. The design also provides flexible extraction and admission design capability from/to the steam path for feed water heating, cooling or other cycle connections.
Tuning the nozzle carriers may be effective to achieve a consistent or more nearly consistent transient thermal response of the turbine, regardless of design flow level or design duct firing level. This results in more consistent radial clearances for all turbines in the design space. Cycle time can be reduced by having common long lead material across a wide design space, while at the same time having a design that is robust to the variation in operational response inherent in a design based on the use of common long lead material.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
798106 | Kerr | Aug 1905 | A |
1112295 | Kieser | Sep 1914 | A |
1923251 | Bauer et al. | Aug 1933 | A |
3572968 | Musick et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3881842 | Kosyak et al. | May 1975 | A |
3881843 | Meylan | May 1975 | A |
3915588 | Brandstatter | Oct 1975 | A |
4509238 | Lee et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4585478 | Yoshioka et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4602412 | Partington et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4666369 | Brinkman | May 1987 | A |
4710102 | Ortolano | Dec 1987 | A |
4764658 | Panzeri | Aug 1988 | A |
4765046 | Partington et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4936002 | Silvestri, Jr. et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5060842 | Qureshi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5211540 | Evans | May 1993 | A |
5236349 | Fabris | Aug 1993 | A |
5238368 | Ortolano | Aug 1993 | A |
5326221 | Amyot et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5350276 | Gros | Sep 1994 | A |
5509784 | Caruso et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511941 | Brandon | Apr 1996 | A |
5791147 | Earley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794446 | Earley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798082 | Kadoya et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5961280 | Turnquist et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5961284 | Kuriyama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997806 | Fujita et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6036437 | Wolfe et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6109869 | Maddaus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6171053 | Ulma | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6233939 | Ngo-Beelmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6273675 | Magoshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6416277 | Manges, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6629819 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631858 | Farineau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6742988 | Mundra et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6827554 | Caruso et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843479 | Burdgick | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6846160 | Saito et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6877952 | Wilson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6939106 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6971844 | Burdgick | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7097423 | Burdgick | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097428 | Barb et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7207773 | O'Clair et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7270518 | Barb et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7329098 | Burdgick | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7427187 | Burdgick et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7458770 | Russo et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7713023 | Hamlin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7713024 | Burdgick | May 2010 | B2 |
7722314 | Burdgick | May 2010 | B2 |
7887291 | Chevrette et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900431 | Willson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7981360 | Singh et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8056608 | Goodwin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8128353 | Flanagan et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8197197 | Flanagan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8834114 | Sterantino | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20110008173 | Tsukuda et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140241869 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |