1. Technical Field
The present invention relates generally, to construction material, and more specifically, to a light-framed structural member composed of a wood core and a light-gauge metal jacket.
2. Prior Art
In light-framed construction, support for structures is conventionally provided by members composed of a single material, predominantly either wood or metal studs. These single-material members are often vulnerable to failure due to characteristics of the material. For examples, while wood is very vulnerable to fire and termite, a metal stud has inherent problems of pre-mature failure due to weak connection and local buckling. Furthermore, use of certain materials can have a negative effect on the environment. For example, inefficient use of timber wastes trees, a valuable natural resource. Also, timber is often treated for use in exterior construction which can add pollutants to the environment. In another example, pressure treated wood produces a large volume of waste water with pollutants.
In heavy duty construction, composite techniques are often used to achieve higher structural performance. A composite structure combines different structural materials together to form a new structure. Since it fully utilizes the potential of individual materials, the advantages of composite structures have been well recognized in the engineering community during the past decades.
However, past composite applications, such as concrete-filled steel tubes and composite floor decks, mostly involve combining steel and concrete in various forms, and are primarily used in commercial buildings and infrastructures. There is practically no composite application in light-framed structures.
The above-mentioned needs are met by an apparatus, system, method, and method of manufacture for using a composite member for enhanced structural performance in light-framed construction.
A composite member provides support to a structure. In one embodiment, a wooden core of the composite member has a perimeter and a length. The wooden core provides support to the structure. In another embodiment, a metal jacket is tightly wrapped to a calculated magnitude of pre-stressed tension in circumferential direction around the entire perimeter of the wooden core of the composite member and can span the entire length. The metal jacket also provides support to the structure.
Furthermore, the interaction between the wooden core and the metal jacket provide a combination of strength that surpasses the individual strengths. Specifically, while the metal jacket provides lateral confinement for the wooden core to increase the compressive strength and ductility of the core in the compression zone, the wooden core also provides lateral support for the metal jacket to prevent pre-mature local buckling failure of the jacket. Thus, the overall strength and ductility of the new composite member is expected to be much higher than the sum those of wooden core and metal jacket when used alone due to two-way lateral interaction. More specifically, the phrase “two-way lateral interaction” refers: (1) a first lateral interaction is that the core help the outer jacket to gain additional capacity by prevent of delay it pre-mature local buckling failure; (2) a second lateral interaction is that the outer jacket helps inner core to gain additional capacity through the coupling of core dilation and confinement effect.
Advantageously, the composite member provides higher strength and ductility, stronger yet simpler connections, better fire and erosion resistance, higher quality, lighter weight, and is environmental-friendly. The present invention covers the whole structural system, which includes components, their connections, vertical gravity framing systems and lateral seismic/wind systems.
The features and advantages described in this summary and in the following detailed description are not all-inclusive, and particularly, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims hereof. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter, resort to the claims being necessary to determine such inventive subject matter.
In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples of the invention, the invention is not limited to the examples depicted in the figures.
An apparatus, system, method, and method of manufacture for using a composite member for enhanced structural performance are described herein. The following detailed description is intended to provide example implementations to one of ordinary skill in the art, and is not intended to limit the invention to the explicit disclosure, as one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that variations can be substituted that are within the scope of the invention as described.
A composite member combines different materials together. Examples of a composite member include, but are not limited to, a joist or beam, post or column, stud or rod, or pole, or other supporting member. The described technique can also be applied to components of a member, connector, rafter, truss, structural system, vertical gravity framing system, lateral seismic or wind system, and the like.
In an embodiment, a steel-wood composite structure using light gauge steel sheet tightly wrapping around a standard wood member to a optimum pre-stressed tension in circumferential direction in order to achieve exceptional structural performance that is superior to that when either steel or wood used alone. The essence of the composite mechanism is that “confinement effect” coupled with “core dilation” produce “two-way lateral interaction” normal to the interface between the two materials, which increases the compressive strength of both materials under general loading.
Researches on constitutional relationship of structural material indicates that brittle materials like wood has the characteristics of the “increased strengthen and ductility under 3-dimentional compressive stress status”. In other word, when a wood cylinder is compressed in the direction parallel to grain, it would crack along the length (i.e. split along the grain) and its cross section would expand laterally, and the overall volume would dilate. Therefore, it would fail without a warning at ultimate load, and then unload sharply. This is in fact the inherent material property of all brittle material that are stronger in compression than in tension. However, if the brittle wooden core is confined in the direction perpendicular to grain with a pre-stress metal jacket, then the failure mode would change from suddenly brittle failure to gradual ductile failure. It is because the pre-stressed metal jacket would prevent and limit the core from dilating, creating lateral compressive stress normal to the interface between the two materials thus ensure the core material under 3-dimentional compressive stress status. Therefore, weak brittle material would become stronger ductile material when used as a core. The above “confinement effect” coupled with “core dilation” forms the foundation of the composite stud of this embodiment.
With a calculated amount of initial confinement force (i.e., optimum pre-stressed tension in circumferential direction), not only the ultimate strength can be increased significantly, but also its ductility increased significantly, which is the very wanted characteristics for all structural material, particularly under seismic loading. To achieve the benefits of the “confinement effect”, it is important for the wooden core to be tightly wrapped around full perimeter and span the entire length. Any gap around the perimeter could lead to zero confinement force, and forfeit the entire purpose of the composite studs. Any gap along the length of the member could create a weak section that control the failing capacity of the whole member, which also forfeits the purpose of composite studs, but in a different way. In brief, there are two equally critical aspects of the composite studs: (1) confinement effect provided by the outer jacket; and (2) dilation of the brittle inner core under compression.
On the other hand, while the metal jacket provides lateral confinement for the wooden core to increase the compressive strength and ductility of the core, the wooden core also provides lateral support for the metal jacket to prevent the pre-mature local buckling failure of the jacket. Thus, the overall strength and ductility of the new composite member is considerably higher than the sum of those of the wooden core and metal jacket when used alone.
Furthermore, the composite member described herein is environmentally-friendly. First, because of the lateral confinement provided by the metal jacket, recycled material, such as glued wood chips, can be used as core material just as effectively as new lumber. Second, because the metal jacket protects the core from water and weathering, composite studs can be used for exterior construction without chemical treatment. As a result, fewer trees are taken from the environment and fewer pollutants are released into the environment. A popular exterior framing member in the current market is composed of pressure treated lumbers, which consume energy and produce large quantity of waste water during manufacturing and causing chemical pollutions during manufactures and after installations.
A wooden core post 630 can be 4×4, 6×6, 4×6 saw lumber or engineering wood like LVL or PSL. Currently, when the strength of a 6×6 saw lumber is not adequate, the engineer would use a 6×6 PSL to substitute. However, PSL is not only 3-4 times more expensive than saw lumber ones, but also does not shrink like a saw lumber over the time. This sometimes can cause problems of distort deformation and/or cracks on the wall finishing. Composite post 620 is expected much cheaper and more compatible than the PSL counterpart.
When installed in a stud wall, composite post can easily connected to top plate 640, 650, 660. The technique avoids the use of toe nailing, which is the traditional method and having very low capacity.
Connection of a composite post to a regular bottom plate is similar to top 670, 680, 690. Note that two pairs of end tags are bended towards inside, this will dramatically increase end bearing capacity, and achieve higher design load.
When the metal jacked deteriorates over the time due to wreathing, it can be easily stripped off from the bottom, exposing a brand new wood post 930 which can last many more years. The metal jacket can be recycled to minimize the environmental impact.
The only difference between composite laminated board 2410 and composite sandwich board 2310 is that one has metal sheet on only one face for higher performance, but the other has metal sheet on both faces for maximum performance.
The following examples provide additional embodiments.
Composite stud and rod, joist, beam or post, comprising a core member that is made of either saw lumber, or engineering wood of any kind, which is of typical sizes, including square, rectangular or circular cross sections. A metal jacket wraps tightly around the perimeter of wood core section to an optimum pre-stressed tension in circumferential direction. The metal jacket wraps the wood core along an entire length in this particular embodiment, and is bonded and anchored to the wood using any one or more of the following connecting methods: pre-punched teeth of any pattern that bite into the wood core, or metal nails or screws that spaced at certain distance along the length of the composite member at any pattern. When the metal jacket fully wraps the core section perimeter with a overlap, the edges of the metal jacket are welded together to seal the wood core using either spot welding, or segment welding, or their combinations, or full length welding. When the metal jacket fully wraps the core section perimeter with a overlap, the metal jacket is closed by twist and/or bending the overlap in any form. The above connecting methods are designed to develop the required initial confinement force (i.e. optimum pre-stressed), and withstand the confinement force throughout the loading process until the ultimate material potential of both wooden core and metal jacket are fully developed. In other word, the connection capacity is engineered to develop the optimum pre-stress and composite mechanism of two-way lateral interaction.
The wood core can be solid, without void (except a small circular hole at center for wire and cable going-through), and is made of one piece or several segments of wood or engineered plastic or foam of any kind, or any other material having similar properties, or the combination of the above materials. The metal jacket can be made of one piece, or of several pieces of light-gauged cold-formed steel sheets, or stainless steel, aluminum, copper or alloy sheets, or any other metal sheets having similar properties, or the combination of the above material. The composite stud is with or without connecting tags or caps at one or both ends. The metal jacket is with or without pre-punched holes or teeth of any pattern for convenient field installation of any sheathing boards using nails or screws without drilling through the metal jacket at field required.
A sheathing board, that is used in building construction, and that has pre-marked pattern at one or both faces that matches the pre-punched holes at composite studs as recited in example 1 for the purpose of locating nailing holes. The above pre-marked pattern can be of one or more of the following formats: factory drilled holes, printed marks or factory made indentations.
The sheathing material can be made of: plywood, gypsum board, oriented strand board (OSB), particle board, wood board, building board, or of any other existing and future building material, that is used as either interior or exterior sheathings.
A building gravity system, made of the composite studs as recited in example 1, including: stud walls of typical building constructions that is made of, or partially made of, composite studs and posts, floor framing of typical constructions that is made of, or partially made of, composite joists and beams, roof framing of typical constructions that is made of, or partially made of, composite joists and beams, floor or roof trusses that is made of, or partially made of, composite studs, and composite posts that are used to support floor, deck, or roof gravity loads.
A building lateral system, made of the composite studs as recited in example 1, including: shear walls that are made of, or partially made of, composite studs and posts, and have plywood or metal sheathing as described in examples 2, or composite sheathing board as described in example 6 on one or both faces, shear walls can be made of, or partially made of, composite studs and posts, and have with typical tension straps at one or both faces, and one or both directions, and a cantilever system with a composite post to resist lateral loads.
Other structural system, made of the composite studs as in example 1, including: composite rods or studs that are used as poles and/or posts to support electric power lines, and/or telecommunication cable lines, composite rods or studs that are used as poles and/or posts support lights along street, composite rods or studs that are used as poles and/or posts to support flags, banners, or traffic signs, composite rods or studs that are used as fence posts, and composite rods or studs that are used in space trusses, like power transmission towers, wind turbine supporting structures, construction scaffold, and stage truss segments.
Laminated composite sheathing, as shown in
In summary, a composite member having a wooden core and a metal jacket with enhanced structural performance has been disclosed. The disclosure herein is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority as a continuation-in-part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/243,909, filed on Sep. 23, 2011, entitled STEEL AND WOOD COMPOSITE STRUCTURE WITH METAL JACKET WOOD STUDS AND RODS, by WeiHong Yang, which is a continuation-in-part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/804,601, filed on Mar. 19, 2010, entitled STEEL-WOOD COMPOSITE STRUCTURE USING METAL JACKET WOOD STUDS, by WeiHong Yang, the contents of each being hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
96793 | Gatling | Nov 1869 | A |
1453996 | Riddle | May 1923 | A |
1615815 | Birdsey | Jan 1927 | A |
2039398 | Dye | May 1936 | A |
2099470 | Coddington | Nov 1937 | A |
2126622 | Davis | Aug 1938 | A |
2167835 | Greulich | Aug 1939 | A |
2167836 | Greulich | Aug 1939 | A |
2187280 | Olson | Jan 1940 | A |
2200159 | Davis | May 1940 | A |
2387432 | Du Laney | Oct 1945 | A |
2918150 | Blum | Dec 1959 | A |
3294608 | Peterson | Dec 1966 | A |
3349537 | Hopfeld | Oct 1967 | A |
3385015 | Hadley | May 1968 | A |
3531901 | Will, Jr. et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3531903 | Swanson | Oct 1970 | A |
3605360 | Lindal | Sep 1971 | A |
3728837 | Kiefer, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
3866884 | Heil et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3913290 | Billing et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4001993 | Daniels | Jan 1977 | A |
4098109 | Cailloux | Jul 1978 | A |
4281497 | Luotonen et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4430373 | Hammarberg | Feb 1984 | A |
4446668 | Christ-Janer | May 1984 | A |
4501102 | Knowles | Feb 1985 | A |
4586550 | Kitipornchai | May 1986 | A |
4615163 | Curtis et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4738071 | Ezard | Apr 1988 | A |
5308675 | Crane et al. | May 1994 | A |
5497595 | Kalinin | Mar 1996 | A |
5511355 | Dingler | Apr 1996 | A |
5533309 | Rivin | Jul 1996 | A |
5580648 | Castle et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5617685 | Meier et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5617697 | Erwin | Apr 1997 | A |
5713169 | Meier et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5809735 | LeBlanc | Sep 1998 | A |
5832691 | Callahan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875604 | Rudd | Mar 1999 | A |
5875605 | Rudd | Mar 1999 | A |
5899239 | Coulis | May 1999 | A |
6050047 | Covelli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061995 | Menchetti et al. | May 2000 | A |
6105321 | KarisAllen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134859 | Rudd | Oct 2000 | A |
6167675 | LeBlanc | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6250042 | Rudd | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260328 | Fowler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6332301 | Goldzak | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343453 | Wright | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6412247 | Menchetti et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6412248 | Rudd | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457292 | Vrana | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505454 | Dingler | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516584 | Rudd | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519911 | Sawada | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6594964 | Charland | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6729607 | Alberson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749709 | Krishnawswamy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6886296 | John et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895723 | Knokey et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902150 | Alberson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6938392 | Fouad et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986205 | Vrana | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993883 | Belanger | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7168220 | Owoc et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7464512 | Perina | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7543369 | Burkett | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8161712 | Mackenzie | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8225580 | Peneder | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8266856 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8322037 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8329272 | Cesternino | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8438808 | Carlson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8468774 | Garry | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8511043 | Fyfe | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8555601 | Brunner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8621797 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8650820 | Bocquet et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010048101 | Bligh et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020024043 | Albritton | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026762 | Charland | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073641 | Menchetti et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088967 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112428 | Dingler | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144484 | Vrana | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158241 | Ochoa | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166306 | Wilson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030194931 | Crigler | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040040253 | Knokey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040226254 | Charlwood | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050166530 | Wilson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050252165 | Hubbell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060070339 | Peneder | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070131918 | James | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137137 | Peek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070175583 | Mosallam | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070256389 | Davis | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080159807 | Andrews | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080282633 | Buckholt | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090013640 | Caroussos | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090293405 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100047489 | Cesternino | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100139181 | Cortina-Cordero et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100207087 | James | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110167759 | Cesternino | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110250417 | Hubbell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252743 | Yang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120011805 | Yang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120141706 | Bocquet et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120298943 | Yang | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130025222 | Mueller | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130055677 | Hayden et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130133278 | Kim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130160398 | Yang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130340384 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130340385 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140083046 | Yang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1840836 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1552045 | Apr 1970 | DE |
1813338 | Jul 1970 | DE |
102011079934 | Jan 2013 | DE |
115769 | Aug 1984 | EP |
284494 | Sep 1988 | EP |
2963819 | Feb 2012 | FR |
1305645 | Feb 1973 | GB |
1305755 | Feb 1973 | GB |
11200557 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2003343037 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2007146617 | Jun 2007 | JP |
WO 8203647 | Oct 1982 | WO |
WO 2006102798 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2011115713 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011115713 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2012044173 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of JP 2007-146617 A retrieved from the JPO on Aug. 20, 2013 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130239512 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13243909 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13887353 | US | |
Parent | 12804601 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13243909 | US |