STEEL COMPONENT

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230212731
  • Publication Number
    20230212731
  • Date Filed
    May 17, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    July 06, 2023
    10 months ago
Abstract
Provided is a steel component with excellent surface fatigue strength. The steel component has a nitride compound layer with a thickness of 5.0 μm to 30.0 μm and a hardened layer in an order from a component surface to a component inside, where a thickness of a porous layer on an outermost surface of the nitride compound layer is 3.0 μm or less and 40.0% or less of a thickness of the nitride compound layer, and the hardened layer has a hardness of HV600 or more at a position of 50 μm inward from the component surface, a hardness of HV400 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 400 μm, and a hardness of HV250 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 600 μm.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to a steel component, especially to a steel component having excellent fatigue resistance and having a compound layer that has been subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment on a surface layer.


BACKGROUND

Machine structural components such as automobile gears are required to have excellent fatigue resistance, and therefore such components are usually subjected to surface hardening treatment. Examples of well-known surface hardening treatment include carburizing treatment, induction quench hardening, and nitriding treatment.


Among these, in carburizing treatment, C is immersed and diffused in high-temperature austenite region and a deep hardening depth is obtained. Therefore, carburizing treatment is effective in improving fatigue resistance. However, since carburizing treatment causes heat treatment distortion, it is difficult to apply such treatment to components that require severe dimensional accuracy from the perspective of noise or the like.


Further, in induction quench hardening, quenching is performed on a surface layer by high frequency induction heating, which causes heat treatment distortion and leads to problems in dimensional accuracy as in the case with carburizing treatment.


On the other hand, in nitriding treatment, surface hardness is increased by immersing and diffusing nitrogen in a relatively low temperature range equal to or lower than the Ac1 transformation temperature, which causes little heat treatment distortion such as mentioned above. However, there are problems that the treatment requires a long time of 50 hours to 100 hours, and it is necessary to remove brittle compound layers on the surface layer after the treatment.


Therefore, nitrocarburizing treatment in which treatment is performed at a treatment temperature almost equal to nitriding treatment temperature and in a shorter treatment time has been developed and has been widely used for machine structural components and the like in recent years. In the nitrocarburizing treatment, N and C are simultaneously immersed in a temperature range of 500° C. to 600° C. to form a nitride layer with solute C dissolved therein in the outermost surface, and at the same time, N is diffused into the steel substrate to form a hardened layer to harden the surface. The treatment time of the nitrocarburizing treatment can be reduced to half or less of that of the conventional nitriding treatment.


However, whereas the carburizing treatment enables to increase the core hardness by quench hardening, nitrocarburizing treatment does not increase the core hardness because it is performed at a temperature equal to or lower than the transformation temperature of steel. Therefore, a nitrocarburized material is inferior in fatigue resistance to a carburized material.


Quenching and tempering are usually performed before nitrocarburizing treatment to increase the core hardness, so that the fatigue resistance of a nitrocarburized material can be improved. However, this approach cannot provide sufficient fatigue resistance. Further, this approach increases manufacturing costs and deteriorates mechanical workability.


To solve these problems, JP H05-59488 A (PTL 1) proposes a steel for nitrocarburizing which can exhibit good bending fatigue resistance after subjection to nitrocarburizing treatment by adding Ni, Cu, Al, Cr, Ti, and the like to the steel. Regarding this steel, by performing nitrocarburizing treatment, the core part is age hardened by Ni—Al based or Ni—Ti based intermetallic compounds or Cu compounds, while in the surface layer, for example, Cr, Al, Ti nitrides or carbides are precipitated and hardened in the nitride layer, to improve the bending fatigue resistance.


JP 2002-69572 A (PTL 2) proposes a steel for nitrocarburizing which provides excellent bending fatigue resistance after subjection to nitrocarburizing treatment by subjecting a steel containing 0.5% to 2% of Cu to extend forging by hot forging, and then air cooling the steel so as to have a microstructure mainly composed of ferrite with solute Cu dissolved therein, and then causing precipitation hardening of Cu during nitrocarburizing treatment at 580° C. for 120 minutes and precipitation hardening of carbonitrides of Ti, V and Nb.


JP 2010-163671 A (PTL 3) proposes a steel for nitrocarburizing obtained by dispersing Ti—Mo carbides, and further dispersing carbides containing one or more of Nb, V, and W.


JP 6388075 B (PTL 4) proposes to improve the surface fatigue strength by reducing the void ratio of a surface compound layer.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature

PTL 1: JP H05-59488 A


PTL 2: JP 2002-69572 A


PTL 3: JP 2010-163671 A


PTL 4: JP 6388075 B


SUMMARY
Technical Problem

However, although the nitrocarburized steels described in the PTLs 1 to 3 have excellent bending fatigue resistance, they give no consideration to surface fatigue resistance. The technology described in the PTL 4 improves the surface fatigue resistance by improving the compound layer of the outermost surface, but it gives no consideration to the depth of a hardened layer.


It could thus be helpful to provide a steel component with excellent surface fatigue resistance by appropriately adjusting a compound layer and the depth of a hardened layer.


Solution to Problem

To solve the problems, we have diligently studied the optimum compound layer and the optimum depth of a hardened layer. As a result, we found that it is effective to improve the surface fatigue resistance by achieving both an increase in the depth of a hardened layer and suppression of embrittlement of a compound layer.


1. A steel component, comprising a nitride compound layer with a thickness of 5.0 μm to 30.0 μm and a hardened layer in an order from a component surface to a component inside, wherein


a thickness of a porous layer on an outermost surface of the nitride compound layer is 3.0 μm or less and 40.0% or less of a thickness of the nitride compound layer, and


the hardened layer has a hardness of HV600 or more at a position of 50 μm inward from the component surface, a hardness of HV400 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 400 μm, and a hardness of HV250 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 600 μm.


2. The steel component according to 1., wherein the steel component is a toothed component and has the nitride compound layer and the hardened layer at least in a tooth portion.


Advantageous Effect

According to the present disclosure, it is possible to provide a steel component with excellent surface fatigue strength. Therefore, the steel component of the present disclosure is extremely useful when applied to mechanical structural components for automobiles and the like.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates a roller pitching test piece; and



FIG. 2 illustrates typical manufacturing processes of a nitrocarburized component.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following describes the present disclosure in detail.


First, the reasons for limiting the thickness of the nitride compound layer and the porous layer and the hardness distribution of the hardened layer of the steel component of the present disclosure to the above-described ranges are explained.


Thickness of nitride compound layer containing nitride compound: 5.0 μm to 30.0 μm


The nitride compound layer (hereafter may be referred to as “compound layer”) has an extremely high hardness and contributes to improving the surface fatigue resistance of the steel component. A too thin nitride compound layer leads to early exposure of the steel substrate of the steel component due to wearing, which decreases the fatigue strength improvement effect. Therefore, the thickness of the nitride compound layer is set to 5.0 μm or more. It is preferably 6.0 μm or more and more preferably 10.0 μm or more.


On the other hand, a too thick nitride compound layer renders it difficult to suppress the formation of the porous layer described below. Therefore, the thickness of the nitride compound layer is set to 30.0 μm or less. It is preferably 25.0 μm or less.


Thickness of porous layer: 40.0% or less of the thickness of nitride compound layer and 3.0 μm or less


The porous layer is an aggregate of minute pores inevitably formed in the outermost surface of the compound layer by nitrocarburizing. Since the presence of the porous layer adversely affects the fatigue strength, it is desirable to make it as thin as possible. When the thickness of the porous layer exceeds 3.0 μm or exceeds 40.0% of the thickness of the nitride compound layer, the expected improvement in fatigue resistance due to the formation of the nitride compound layer cannot be sufficiently achieved. Therefore, the thickness of the porous layer needs to be 40.0% or less of the thickness of the nitride compound layer and 3.0 μm or less. It may be even 0.


The thickness of the porous layer in the present disclosure is measured with the method described in the EXAMPLES section below.


Depth of hardened layer: a hardness of HV600 or more at a position of 50 μm inward from the component surface, a hardness of HV400 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 400 μm, and a hardness of HV250 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 600 μm.


It is known that there is a correlation between material hardness and fatigue strength (see, for example, “MatNavi, JIS Steel for Machine Structural Use, Mechanical Properties and Fatigue Properties of Chromium Steel and Chromium Molybdenum Steel”). In other words, a desired fatigue strength can be obtained if there is sufficient hardness, regardless of the composition.


When a steel component has a slipping contact, two types of forces are applied to the steel component. One is the shear stress due to the tangential forces, which is maximized at the surface. The other is the shear stress due to the perpendicular reaction force, which is maximized at deeper positions. The hardness distribution is set to exhibit excellent fatigue resistance against these two types of forces.


In particular, the shear stress due to the perpendicular reaction force tends to be a problem for nitrocarburized steel with a thin hardened layer. The shear stress distribution due to the perpendicular reaction force when the teeth, cylinders, and spheres of a gear are brought into contact with each other can be expressed by the following equation. As used herein, z is the depth, P(z) is the shear stress at depth z, Pmax is the maximum contact stress, and b is the osculating ellipse minor axis length.







P

(
z
)

=


P
max

×

(


z
b

-


z
2


b
×



b
2

+

z
2






)






Although it depends on the shape of the steel component and the load applied thereon, the shear stress has a maximum value at a depth of 400 μm in many cases, which may serve as an initiation point of fracture. Therefore, the hardness distribution is set as described above.


Although the nitride compound layer is formed after the subjection of the steel to nitrocarburizing treatment, N diffuses inward from the compound layer due to the nitrocarburizing treatment. As a result, this N diffusion layer becomes a hardened layer. By adjusting the N concentration by diffusion, the hardness of the hardened layer can be adjusted as described above.


The steel component of the present disclosure is particularly preferably applied to a toothed component such as a gear, and it is particularly preferable that the nitride compound layer and the hardened layer be formed in a tooth portion of the toothed component. The tooth portion of a toothed component such as a gear is a portion that has a slipping contact and that requires excellent surface fatigue strength. When the nitride compound layer and the hardened layer are formed in the tooth portion, the durability as a toothed component can be ensured.


Not only for a toothed component but also for steel components with a portion having a slipping contact, the surface fatigue of this portion is important for ensuring the durability of the component. Therefore, by forming the nitride compound layer and the hardened phase in such a portion, the effect of improving the durability can be obtained. For this reason, the steel component of the present disclosure is not limited to a toothed component.


The following describes a method of manufacturing the steel component of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 illustrates typical manufacturing processes for manufacturing a nitrocarburized component using steel for nitrocarburizing (steel bar). In the figure, S1 is a process of manufacturing a steel bar (steel for nitrocarburizing) which is a raw material, S2 is a process of transporting the steel bar, and S3 is a process of manufacturing a component (nitrocarburized component).


First, in the steel bar manufacturing process (S1), a steel ingot is subjected to hot rolling and/or hot forging to obtain a steel bar, and after quality inspection, the steel bar is shipped. After being transported (S2), the steel bar is cut into predetermined dimensions, subjected to hot forging or cold forging, formed into a desired shape (such as the shape of a gear product or a shaft product) by cutting work such as drill boring or lathe turning as necessary, and then subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment to obtain a product in the nitrocarburized component finish process (S3).


Alternatively, the hot rolled material may be directly subjected to cutting work such as lathe turning or drill boring to obtain a desired shape and then subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment to obtain a product. In the case of hot forging, there are cases where cold straightening is performed after hot forging.


Next, the obtained rolled material or forged material is subjected to cutting work to obtain the shape of the component, and then subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment. To obtain the depth of a hardened layer as described above, it is necessary to set the nitrocarburizing temperature to 550° C. to 590° C. and the nitrocarburizing time to at least 5 hours. On the other hand, when the nitrocarburizing time is such a long time, the compound layer and the porous layer grow excessively depending on the nitrocarburizing conditions, which causes a decrease in fatigue strength. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the nitriding potential low during the nitrocarburizing. As the nitriding potential of the atmosphere during the nitrocarburizing decreases, the thickness of the porous layer decreases. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain the relationship between the nitriding potential and the porous layer thickness in advance for each standard or component of the steel used as the raw material and to adopt a nitriding potential that can achieve the porous layer thickness specified in the present disclosure.


In the nitrocarburizing treatment, N and C are simultaneously immersed into the steel to form a nitride compound layer with solute C dissolved therein, and N is diffused into the steel substrate. Therefore, the nitrocarburizing treatment may be performed in a mixed atmosphere of nitrogenous gas such as NH3 and N2 and carburizing gas such as CO2 and CO, such as an atmosphere of NH3:N2:CO2=50:45:5.


Examples

The following describes examples of the present disclosure in detail.


Steels (steel sample IDs A to E) having the compositions listed in Table 1 were made into cast steels, each having a cross section of 300 mm×400 mm, using a continuous casting machine. Each cast steel was subjected to soaking at 1250° C. for 30 minutes and then hot rolled into a billet having a rectangular cross section with a side of 140 mm. Further, the billet was subjected to hot rolling to obtain an 80 mmφ steel bar (raw material as hot rolled). The steel bar was held at 1200° C. for one hour and then subjected to hot forging to obtain a smaller 35 mmφ steel bar.









TABLE 1







(mass %)














Steel
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Others

















A
0.230
0.20
3.13
0.030
0.101
3.01



B
0.121
0.30
1.45
0.012
0.050
1.37



C
0.195
0.25
2.42
0.012
0.040
1.98
V: 0.2


D
0.061
0.02
1.79
0.015
0.042
1.19
Nb: 0.12


E
0.195
0.19
0.82
0.010
0.059
1.39



F
1.011
0.18
0.25
0.020
0.010
1.40



G
0.530
0.20
0.80
0.015
0.013
1.09
V: 0.2


H
0.060
0.53
0.80
0.031
0.015
17.20










Further, a roller-pitching test piece as illustrated in FIG. 1 was collected from the hot forged material parallel to the longitudinal direction, and the test piece was subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment. To obtain the desired compound layer and hardness distribution, the nitrocarburizing temperature, time, and nitriding potential were adjusted appropriately.


The materials thus obtained by being subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment was further subjected to hardness measurement, compound layer/porous layer thickness measurement, and fatigue resistance evaluation. The results of these measurements and evaluations are listed in Table 2 (Tables 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3).


The hardness was measured at each position of 50 μm, 400 μm, and 600 μm from the surface of a cross section of the nitrocarburized material. The hardness was measured using a Vickers hardness meter at six points with a test load of 2.94 N (300 gf) in accordance with JIS Z2244, and the average value of the results was determined.


The thickness of the compound layer and the porous layer was measured on a cross section of the nitrocarburized material. The steel was corroded with 3% nital solution, and the surface layer was observed using an optical microscopy for three observation fields at 1000 magnifications to identify the uncorroded compound layer. The thickness of the compound layer was measured as the value of the maximum compound layer thickness in the three observation fields. Regarding the porous layer, the thickness of the thickest location of the aggregate of minute pores existing continuously from the surface in the depth direction was measured in each of the three observation fields, and the maximum value among the results was taken as the thickness of the porous layer.


The fatigue resistance evaluation was performed using a roller pitching test piece (see FIG. 1) that had been subjected to nitrocarburizing treatment but had not been subjected to any of microstructure observation, hardness measurement and precipitate observation, and the fatigue life of the roller pitching test piece was measured by RPT-402 manufactured by Nikko Create. The roller pitching test conditions were a maximum contact stress of 2600 MPa, a slip rate of 40%, using gear oil (BESCO transaxle) as lubricating oil, and an oil temperature of 80° C. The rotational speed during the test was 1500 rpm. A quenched and tempered SUJ2 with a crowning R of 150 mm was used as a large roller in contact with the transporting surface.


















TABLE 2-1













Life at











maximum




Compound
Porous
Porous layer



contact




layer
layer
thickness/
50 μm
400 μm
600 μm
stress of




thickness
thickness
compound layer
hardness
hardness
hardness
2600 MPa


No.
Steel
(μm)
(μm)
thickness × 100
HV
HV
HV
(times)
Classification
























1
A
21.1
1.8
8.5
758
551
312
2.3 × 107
Example


2
A
10.1
2.8
27.7
760
551
305
4.3 × 107


3
A
5.2
1.3
25.0
736
555
310
2.5 × 107


4
A
28.2
2.7
9.6
758
548
313
3.1 × 107


5
B
5.6
2.1
37.5
758
543
314
3.1 × 107


6
B
15.5
2.4
15.5
751
545
311
4.1 × 107


7
B
8.2
2.7
32.9
758
545
318
2.2 × 107


8
B
29.3
2.7
9.2
754
550
310
2.5 × 107


9
C
18.5
2.3
12.4
758
550
317
3.2 × 107


10
C
9.8
2.9
29.6
752
547
314
4.1 × 107


11
C
6.3
2.1
33.3
713
532
333
2.7 × 107


12
C
26.9
2.8
10.4
763
548
306
2.3 × 107


13
D
27.3
1.5
5.5
757
550
320
2.4 × 107


14
D
6.3
2.1
33.3
756
551
309
2.2 × 107


15
D
12.3
2.9
23.6
755
546
318
2.5 × 107


16
D
27.9
2.6
9.3
763
548
316
2.3 × 107


17
E
7.1
1.3
18.3
746
543
310
2.1 × 107


18
E
12.1
2.5
20.7
756
550
312
2.1 × 107


19
E
20.2
2.8
13.9
756
549
314
3.1 × 107


20
E
29.9
2.9
9.7
758
556
314
3.0 × 107


21
F
13.2
1.3
9.8
615
413
264
2.1 × 107


22
F
6.1
1.1
18.0
666
415
261
2.3 × 107


23
F
16.3
2.9
17.8
676
446
256
3.2 × 107


24
F
28.2
2.9
10.3
653
451
259
3.2 × 107


25
G
5.3
1.0
18.9
643
434
280
2.4 × 107


26
G
16.3
2.5
15.3
637
427
273
2.5 × 107


27
G
18.2
2.2
12.1
663
445
272
2.1 × 107


28
G
28.1
2.7
9.6
643
431
291
3.0 × 107


29
H
5.5
1.2
21.8
648
419
253
2.1 × 107


30
H
7.5
2.1
28.0
643
479
271
2.3 × 107


31
H
16.2
2.8
17.3
652
510
261
2.7 × 107


32
H
29.1
2.7
9.3
730
558
251
3.0 × 107

























TABLE 2-2













Life at











maximum




Compound
Porous
Porous layer



contact




layer
layer
thickness/
50 μm
400 μm
600 μm
stress of




thickness
thickness
compound layer
hardness
hardness
hardness
2600 MPa


No.
Steel
(μm)
(μm)
thickness × 100
HV
HV
HV
(times)
Classification







33
A

3.3

1.1
33.3
751
549
313
1.1 × 107
Comparative


34
B

4.6

0.5
10.9
698
453
260
8.8 × 106
Example


35
C

4.3

1.5
34.9
751
548
313
1.3 × 107


36
D

4.4

1.6
36.4
630
401
251
6.2 × 106


37
E

2.4

0.8
33.3
758
546
311
1.1 × 107


38
F

4.1

1.3
31.7
632
421
275
2.1 × 106


39
G

3.8

1.1
28.9
663
422
275
8.3 × 106


40
H

4.7

1.1
23.4
673
434
263
6.2 × 106


41
A
26.8 

4.0

14.9
725
506
398
1.1 × 106
Comparative


42
A
5.2
2.3

44.2

763
547
313
2.5 × 106
Example


43
A
9.2

3.3

35.9
755
547
307
2.7 × 106


44
A
20.4 

3.4

16.7
760
547
306
1.4 × 106


45
B
26.9 

8.2

30.5
765
545
311
1.5 × 106


46
B
5.6
2.5

44.6

755
550
314
1.7 × 106


47
B
10.0 

3.6

36.0
760
555
309
2.1 × 106


48
B
28.8 

3.2

11.1
760
553
316
2.6 × 106


49
C
20.8 

6.9

33.2
760
557
305
2.6 × 106


50
C
5.5
2.6

47.3

760
549
309
2.2 × 106


51
C
11.1 

3.3

29.7
761
546
313
1.4 × 106


52
C
28.8 

3.5

12.2
758
544
314
1.7 × 106


53
D
28.4 

9.2

32.4
754
556
307
1.6 × 106


54
D
5.1
2.4

47.1

743
555
310
2.4 × 106


55
D
10.0 

3.4

34.0
766
547
312
1.2 × 106


56
D
26.7 

3.1

11.6
760
552
309
2.6 × 106


57
E
29.3 

5.5

18.8
752
547
310
2.3 × 106


58
E
5.2
2.3
44.2
744
543
296
2.1 × 106


59
E
9.1

3.4

37.4
764
550
306
2.6 × 106


60
E
28.2 

3.5

12.4
757
550
313
1.4 × 106


61
F
5.2
2.1

40.4

634
473
253
1.4 × 106


62
F
10.3 

3.1

30.1
633
492
267
1.5 × 106


63
F
12.4 

4.2

33.9
683
443
251
1.7 × 106


64
F
23.8 

4.3

18.1
688
487
267
2.1 × 106


65
G
5.5
2.3

41.8

676
421
301
1.2 × 106


66
G
11.3 

3.3

29.2
656
423
275
2.6 × 106


67
G
12.7 

3.8

29.9
653
479
310
2.3 × 106


68
G
26.8 

4.2

15.7
637
453
333
2.1 × 106


69
H
5.5
2.4

43.6

679
446
255
1.5 × 106


70
H
10.5 

3.4

32.4
664
475
253
1.7 × 106


71
H
13.1 

3.6

27.5
651
452
257
2.1 × 106


72
H
28.1 

4.5

16.0
677
463
275
2.6 × 106





*1 Underline indicates outside the scope of application.






















TABLE 2-3













Life at







Porous layer



maximum




Compound
Porous
thickness/



contact




layer
layer
compound
50 μm
400 μm
600 μm
stress of




thickness
thickness
layer
hardness
hardness
hardness
2600 MPa


No.
Steel
(μm)
(μm)
thickness × 100
HV
HV
HV
(times)
Classification
























73
A
10.2
1.3
12.7

594

403
267
2.0 × 106
Comparative


74
B
8.7
1.5
17.2

569

407
272
2.1 × 106
Example


75
C
11.1
1.6
14.4

573

401
251
9.3 × 105


76
D
13.1
1.6
12.2

589

423
263
1.5 × 106


77
E
5.9
1.7
28.8

591

429
259
2.3 × 106


78
F
21.3
2.2
10.3

549

443
256
2.1 × 106


79
G
22.3
2.3
10.3

567

423
257
8.3 × 106


80
H
27.2
2.5
 9.2

593

415
254
6.2 × 106


81
A
15.2
1.9
12.5
634

385

253
8.3 × 105
Comparative


82
B
16.8
2.3
13.7
630

376

261
5.9 × 105
Example


83
C
18.2
2.4
13.2
666

391

259
7.9 × 105


84
D
18.1
1.5
 8.3
627

365

267
1.1 × 106


85
E
20.5
2.3
11.2
639

379

264
5.1 × 105


86
F
5.5
1.2
21.8
666

395

264
3.1 × 106


87
G
15.3
2.8
18.3
658

391

255
8.6 × 105


88
H
20.3
2.2
10.8
613

389

253
4.2 × 106


89
A
17.5
2.2
12.6
608
403

240

5.1 × 106
Comparative


90
B
16.2
2.4
14.8
631
404

249

2.7 × 106
Example


91
C
15.5
2.6
16.8
620
409

225

8.1 × 106


92
D
14.7
2.5
17.0
613
413

237

4.7 × 106


93
E
15.8
2.1
13.3
601
415

242

2.5 × 106


94
F
12.3
2.0
16.3
665
442

230

5.1 × 105


95
G
13.4
2.2
16.4
671
423

238

4.3 × 106


96
H
11.0
2.2
20.0
623
411

246

7.7 × 105


97
A
10.5

5.2


49.5

723

201


199

8.9 × 105
Conventional


98
B
11.3
2.9
25.7
713

175


176

8.5 × 104
Example


99
C
10.7

4.3


40.2

765

211


220

5.1 × 105


100
D
9.8
2.5
25.5
722

243


247

1.1 × 106


101
E
17.1

4.5

26.3
645

194


194

3.9 × 104


102
F
12.3

3.4

27.6
710

235


185

1.2 × 106


103
G
11.2
2.5
22.3
723

264


173

1.1 × 106


104
H
10.1
2.7
26.7
723

222


180

3.3 × 106





*1 Underline indicates outside the scope of application.






All Examples had a hardness distribution from the surface in the depth direction where the hardness at depths less than 400 μm from the surface was greater than the hardness at a depth of 400 μm from the surface, and the hardness at depths less than 600 μm was greater than the hardness at a depth of 600 μm from the surface. Therefore, it can be confirmed that the hardness from the surface to depths of 400 μm is equal to or greater than the hardness at a depth of 400 μm from the surface, and the hardness from the surface to depths of 600 μm is equal to or greater than the hardness at a depth of 600 μm from the surface.

Claims
  • 1. A steel component, comprising a nitride compound layer with a thickness of 5.0 μm to 30.0 μm and a hardened layer in an order from a component surface to a component inside, wherein a thickness of a porous layer on an outermost surface of the nitride compound layer is 3.0 μm or less and 40.0% or less of a thickness of the nitride compound layer, andthe hardened layer has a hardness of HV600 or more at a position of 50 μm inward from the component surface, a hardness of HV400 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 400 μm, and a hardness of HV250 or more at a position from the component surface to the component inside of 600 μm.
  • 2. The steel component according to claim 1, wherein the steel component is a toothed component and has the nitride compound layer and the hardened layer at least in a tooth portion.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
2020-086318 May 2020 JP national
2020-086319 May 2020 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2021/018687 5/17/2021 WO