Steel pipe, steel pipe structure, method of manufacturing steel pipe, and method of designing steel pipe

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10189065
  • Patent Number
    10,189,065
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 7, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 29, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
In a steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process, a value a/w is 0.038% or less, where a and w denote an amplitude and a wavelength of the waveform shape, respectively. A method of manufacturing a steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process includes a step of forming the waveform shape such that a value a/w is 0.038% or less, where a and w denote an amplitude and a wavelength of the waveform shape, respectively.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to a steel pipe, a steel pipe structure, a method of manufacturing a steel pipe, and a method of designing a steel pipe.


BACKGROUND

In recent years, gas fields and oil fields are newly developed in abundance due to an increase in demand for gas and petroleum. There are increasing opportunities to embed pipelines that transport gas and petroleum in earthquake-prone areas and non-permafrost areas. However, in such earthquake-prone areas and non-permafrost areas, the ground may be moved due to various causes such as liquefaction, fault displacements, frost heaving, and thawing, and the pipelines may be deformed accordingly. Further, when a pipeline is deformed significantly, steel pipes structuring the pipeline are bent. The pipe can then buckle on the compression side and subsequently break on the tensile side. With these circumstances in the background, techniques of improving deformability of steel pipes so that the steel pipes bend without buckling have been proposed from a viewpoint of preventing damages in the buckling part and preventing leakage of gas or petroleum from the broken part. More specifically, Japanese Patent No. 5447461 (see claim 1 and paragraph 0044) describes a technique of improving the deformability of a steel pipe by arranging a wavelength ratio (the wavelength of a waveform shape/a Timoshenko's buckling wavelength) of the waveform shape (undulation) to be 0.8 or smaller, the waveform shape being formed by outer diameters along the longitudinal direction of the steel pipe through a pipe expansion process.


According to the technique described in Japanese Patent No. 5447461 (see claim 1 and paragraph 0044), while the amplitude of the waveform shape is arranged to have a constant value throughout (0.73 mm=0.06% of OD, where “OD” denotes the diameter of the steel pipe), the range of the wavelength ratio of the waveform shape that can improve the deformability of the steel pipe is defined. However, as a result of extensive studies, we discovered that, even when the wavelength ratio of the waveform shape is in the abovementioned range, deformability of steel pipes may be lowered in some situations depending on the value of the amplitude of the waveform shape. Further, generally speaking, the smaller the wavelength ratio of a waveform shape is, the shorter is the forwarding pitch of the die in the longitudinal direction of the steel pipe during the pipe expansion process. Therefore, when the technique described Japanese Patent No. 5447461 (see claim 1 and paragraph 0044) is used, the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process increase in accordance with the improvement of the deformability of the steel pipe. For this reason, there is a demand for a technique that is able to improve the deformability of steel pipes while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process.


In view of the circumstances described above, it could be helpful to provide a steel pipe, a steel pipe structure, a method of manufacturing a steel pipe, and a method of designing a steel pipe with which it is possible to improve the deformability while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process.


SUMMARY

Our steel pipe has a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process. Further, a value “a/w” is 0.038% or less, where “a” and “w” denote an amplitude and a wavelength of the waveform shape, respectively.


According to our steel pipe, a value “w/λ,” indicating a ratio of the wavelength “w” of the waveform shape to a Timoshenko's buckling wavelength “λ” is larger than 0.8.


Our steel pipe structure is formed by using our steel pipe. The steel pipe structure includes, for example, a pipeline, a steel pipe pile, a steel pipe sheet pile, and a water gate penstock.


A method of manufacturing a steel pipe manufactures a steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process. Further, the pipe expansion process includes a step of forming the waveform shape such that a value “a/w” is 0.038% or less, where “a” and “w” denote an amplitude and a wavelength of the waveform shape, respectively.


A method of designing a steel pipe designs a steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process, and includes a step of evaluating, with respect to the steel pipe to be manufactured, the relationship between a ratio “w/λ” and a buckling-time bending angle by using Expression (1) below, the ratio “w/λ” indicating a ratio of a wavelength “w” of the waveform shape to a Timoshenko's buckling wavelength “λ”, and further determining the wavelength “w” and an amplitude “a” of the waveform shape, on a basis of a result of the evaluation:










The





buckling


-


time





bending





angle

=



(


D





1

+

D





2


)

/
2

+



(


D





1

-

D





2


)

/
2

*

tanh


(


(


-
X

+
α

)

/
β

)








(
1
)








where parameters “D1”, “D2”, “α”, and “β” in Expression (1) have values that are determined by the outer diameter and a thickness of the steel pipe to be manufactured.


By using any of the steel pipe, the steel pipe structure, the method of manufacturing a steel pipe, and the method of designing a steel pipe, it is possible to improve deformability while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a drawing illustrating an example of an outside diameter shape of a steel pipe.



FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing for explaining a bending buckling phenomenon of a steel pipe.



FIG. 3 is a chart illustrating a result of an analysis performed on strains exhibited at the time of buckling (hereinafter, “buckling-time strains”) of a steel pipe having an outside diameter of 20 inches and a thickness of 15.9 mm and another steel pipe having an outside diameter of 48 inches and a thickness of 22 mm.



FIG. 4 is a chart illustrating a graph obtained by normalizing the horizontal axis in FIG. 3 by using a buckling wavelength and by normalizing the vertical axis in FIG. 3 by using the buckling-time strain observed when a wavelength is equal to 0.



FIG. 5 is a chart indicating the relationship between wavelengths and amplitude ratios.



FIG. 6 is a chart illustrating the relationship between buckling wavelength ratios and bending angles at the time of buckling (hereinafter, “buckling-time bending angles”) corresponding to values of a design factor a/w.



FIG. 7 is a chart illustrating the relationship between the buckling wavelength ratios and the buckling-time bending angles.





REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

P STEEL PIPE


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To evaluate buckling phenomena occurring in the vicinity of a welded joint part of a steel pipe, we performed a bending test on a steel pipe (a UOE steel pipe having an outside diameter of 48 inches (1,219 mm) and a thickness of 22 mm) having a welded joint part. When the outside diameter shape of the steel pipe was measured prior to the bending test, the outside diameter shape of the steel pipe appeared to be a waveform shape and exhibited variances. The variances were caused by a pipe expansion process performed on the steel pipe. The wavelength of the waveform shape was similar to the forwarding cycle of a die used in the pipe expansion process. All the amplitude values of the waveform shape were substantially equal to one another and were caused by a constant mechanical diameter-expanding process. FIG. 1 illustrates the outside diameter shape of the steel pipe that was measured. In FIG. 1, the point at which the position in the longitudinal direction is “0” corresponds to the position of the welded joint. In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the wavelength of the waveform shape was approximately 400 mm.



FIG. 2 illustrates an overview of a bending buckling phenomenon of a steel pipe. In some situations, a steel pipe P may exhibit a bending buckling phenomenon as illustrated in FIG. 2, when having gone through a significant deformation (a bending moment) due to liquefaction of the ground or moving of a fault. Thus, to study a bending deformation amount of a steel pipe that can be tolerated before the occurrence of the bending buckling phenomena, a plurality of analysis models were created by varying the wavelength of the waveform shape to compare deformability characteristics by using the analysis models. FIG. 3 illustrates a result of the analysis performed on strains exhibited at the time of buckling (hereinafter, “buckling-time strains”) of a steel pipe having an outside diameter of 20 inches and a thickness of 15.9 mm and another steel pipe having an outside diameter of 48 inches and a thickness of 22 mm. In FIG. 3, the vertical axis expresses a buckling-time strain (a moving-average strain at the time of buckling), whereas the horizontal axis expresses the wavelength of the waveform shape applied to each of the analysis models.


The buckling-time strain has a proportional relationship with the deformation amount and the curvature of a steel pipe. In other words, a steel pipe that buckles with a small deformation amount or a small curvature (i.e., a steel pipe having a small buckling-time strain) has a low degree of deformability. Conversely, a steel pipe that did not buckle until a large deformation amount or a large curvature was exhibited (i.e., a steel pipe having a large buckling-time strain) has a high degree of deformability and is therefore considered to be applicable to a severe environment such as an earthquake-prone area.


As illustrated in FIG. 3, for both the steel pipe having an outside diameter of 20 inches and a thickness of 15.9 mm and the other steel pipe having an outside diameter of 48 inches and a thickness of 22 mm, the smaller the wavelength of the waveform shape is, the larger the buckling-time strain becomes. Also, when the wavelength of the waveform shape is small to a certain extent, a buckling-time strain equal to or larger than a certain value is exhibited. Further, as the wavelength of the waveform shape increases, the buckling-time strain decreases with an S-shaped plot line at a certain threshold value. These characteristics indicate that it is possible to provide a steel pipe having an excellent level of deformability by arranging the wavelength of the waveform shape to be equal to or lower than the certain threshold value.


Accordingly, the analysis result in FIG. 3 comparing the two steel pipes having the mutually-different outer diameters and the mutually-different thicknesses with each other was normalized. FIG. 4 illustrates a graph obtained by normalizing the horizontal axis in FIG. 3 by using a buckling wavelength λ (where “λ” denotes the Timoshenko's buckling wavelength) and normalizing the vertical axis in FIG. 3 by using the buckling-time strain observed when the wavelength is equal to 0. As illustrated in FIG. 4, between the steel pipe having an outside diameter of 20 inches and a thickness of 15.9 mm and the other steel pipe having an outside diameter of 48 inches and a thickness of 22 mm, the relationship is substantially the same between the buckling-time strain and the ratio of the wavelength of the waveform shape to the buckling wavelength λ (i.e., the wavelength of the waveform shape/the buckling wavelength λ; hereinafter, “buckling wavelength ratio”).


On the basis of this relationship, it is possible to maintain the buckling-time strain at a high level by arranging the buckling wavelength ratio to be within a range less than or equal to 0.50. Further, when the buckling wavelength ratio becomes approximately 1.0, the buckling-time strain becomes equivalent to the buckling-time strain exhibited when the buckling wavelength ratio is larger than 1.0 to be as low as approximately 65% of the buckling-time strain exhibited when a steel pipe has a buckling wavelength ratio of 0.5 or smaller.


To shorten the wavelength of the waveform shape, an effective method is to press a die in an overlapping manner so that, during the pipe expansion process, the positions onto which the die is pressed are overlapped in the longitudinal direction of the steel pipe. Accordingly, by using steel pipes each having an outside diameter of 24 inches, an evaluation was made on the waveform shape formed by outer diameters, with respect to a steel pipe to which the overlapping die pressing was applied and another steel pipe to which the overlapping die pressing was not applied. In this situation, the effective length of the die was approximately 450 mm. During the pipe expansion process, the one pipe was prepared by pressing the die with a pitch of 450 mm, and the other pipe was prepared by pressing the die with a smaller pitch of 80 mm (by pressing the die five or six times per effective length).


As a result, we confirmed that the waveform shape formed on the outer diameters is dependent on the manner in which the die is pressed on the steel pipe. More specifically, during the pipe expansion process, the steel pipe on which the die was pressed with the pitch of 450 mm had a waveform shape of which the wavelength was approximately 430 mm to 450 mm. In contrast, during the pipe expansion process, the steel pipe on which the die was pressed with the pitch of 80 mm had a waveform shape of which the wavelength was approximately 60 mm to 70 mm. Further, we also confirmed that the manner in which the die is pressed on the steel pipe also has an impact on the amplitude of the waveform shape and that the smaller the pitch for the pressing of the die is, the smaller the amplitude of the waveform shape is.


Accordingly, we evaluated relationships between wavelengths and amplitudes of the waveform shape. FIG. 5 is a chart indicating a relationship between wavelengths and amplitude ratios. As indicated in FIG. 5, wavelengths and amplitudes of the waveform shape are in a proportional relationship with each other. Consequently, it is possible to improve the deformability of steel pipes by pressing the die finely with a smaller pitch. For this reason, we regarded a ratio “a/w” of the amplitude “a” to the wavelength “w” of the waveform shape as a new design factor and evaluated impacts made on the deformability by values of the design factor a/w.



FIG. 6 is a chart illustrating a relationship between buckling wavelength ratios and bending angles at the time of buckling (hereinafter, “buckling-time bending angles”) corresponding to values of the design factor a/w. As illustrated in FIG. 6, we observed that the buckling wavelength ratio to reach the maximum value (approximately 20 degrees in this example) of the buckling-time bending angle was different for the values of the design factor a/w, and we confirmed that the buckling-time bending angle increases as the value of the design factor a/w decreases. Further, we evaluated the relationship between buckling wavelength ratios and buckling-time bending angles, derived from the technique described in Japanese Patent No. 5447461 (see claim 1 and paragraph 0044). As a result, as indicated by a feature line L11 in FIG. 6, we confirmed that the buckling-time bending angle based on the technique described in Japanese Patent No. 5447461 (see claim 1 and paragraph 0044) is smaller than the buckling-time bending angle indicated by a feature line L3 and corresponds to the situation where the value of the design factor a/w is equal to 0.038%.


The above notion signifies that, by arranging the value of the design factor a/w to be equal to or smaller than 0.038%, and preferably by arranging the value of the design factor a/w to be equal to or smaller than 0.038% while arranging the buckling wavelength ratio to be larger than 0.8, it is possible to achieve the buckling wavelength ratio required by realizing the buckling-time bending angle described in Japanese Patent No. 5447461 (see claim 1 and paragraph 0044), i.e., it is possible to increase the die forwarding amount during the pipe expansion process. Accordingly, by adjusting the wavelength and the amplitude of the waveform shape to arrange the value of the design factor a/w to be equal to or smaller than 0.038%, it is possible to improve the deformability while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process.


By generalizing the feature lines indicated in FIG. 6, it is possible to express the relationship between the buckling-time bending angle and the buckling wavelength ratio X as indicated in Expression (1) below. In this situation, as illustrated in FIG. 7, the parameters D1 and D2 in Expression (1) denote the maximum value and the minimum value of the buckling-time bending angle, respectively. The parameter α is a parameter indicating the buckling wavelength ratio at a point P where the value of the buckling-time bending angle is equal to (D1+D2)/2. The parameter β is a parameter indicating the degree of inclination (the slope) observed when the value of the buckling-time bending angle decreases from the maximum value to the minimum value. Each of the values of the parameters D1, D2, α, and β depends on the outside diameter and the thickness of the steel pipe. A steel pipe having a high level of deformability satisfies the conditions where the value of the parameter D1 is large and where the buckling wavelength ratio (w/λ) of the waveform shape, which is characteristic to UOE steel pipes, is small. When the wavelength of the waveform shape is not controlled and sufficiently long, the deformability may decrease down to the parameter D2. To control the wavelength of the waveform shape during the manufacturing process to bring the level of deformability close to the maximum deformability D1 that can be achieved by a steel pipe, it is necessary to keep the value of the parameter α small. Theoretically, for example, when the buckling wavelength ratio (w/λ) is equal to the value of the parameter α, the level of deformability corresponds to the intermediate value between the parameter D1 and the parameter D2. When the user wishes to improve the deformability from the lowest value represented by the parameter D2, even by as little as 10% of the room for growth expressed as (D1−D2), it is a good idea to select (−X+α)/β=1.1 which corresponds to the situation where the value of tan h((−X+α)/β) calculated from Expression (1) is equal to −0.4. It is considered that the deformability required of steel pipes varies depending on impacts made on public safety and environment conservation by buckling and destructing phenomena exhibited thereby. Further, exercising control to keep the buckling wavelength ratio (w/λ) small, i.e., exercising control finely on the wavelength of the waveform shape of a steel pipe, usually makes the pipe expansion process longer and may cause a disadvantage in terms of productivity. By using the mathematical expression below, it is possible to control the manufacturing method to realize a required level of deformability. It is therefore possible to provide a steel pipe product having a cost advantage, by realizing a level of deformability that is both necessary and sufficient.










The





buckling


-


time





bending





angle

=



(


D





1

+

D





2


)

/
2

+



(


D





1

-

D





2


)

/
2

*

tanh


(


(


-
X

+
α

)

/
β

)








(
1
)







Accordingly, it is possible to design a steel pipe of which it is possible to improve deformability while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process, by preparing values of the parameters D1, D2, α, and β for each of the various outer diameters and the thicknesses of steel pipes in advance through an experiment or an analysis, subsequently reading such values of the parameters D1, D2, α, and β that correspond to the outside diameter and the thickness of a steel pipe to be manufactured, further evaluating the relationship between the buckling-time bending angle and the buckling wavelength ratio X by constructing Expression (1) while using the read values, and determining the wavelength and the amplitude of the waveform shape of the steel pipe to be manufactured on the basis of the result of the evaluation. Further, by performing the pipe expansion process according to the determined buckling wavelength ratio, it is possible to manufacture a steel pipe in which the deformability is improved, while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process. The steel pipe is applicable to a steel pipe structure such as a pipeline, a steel pipe pile, a steel pipe sheet pile, a water gate penstock, or the like.


A number of examples have thus been explained to which steel pipes, structures and methods are applied. However, this disclosure is not limited to the text and drawings presented in the examples to represent a part of the disclosure. In other words, other modes of carrying out steel pipes, structures and methods, other examples, operation techniques and the like that can be arrived at by one skilled in the art on the basis of the described examples all fall within the scope of the appended claims.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

It is possible to provide the steel pipe, the steel pipe structure, the method of manufacturing a steel pipe, and the method of designing a steel pipe with which it is possible to improve the deformability while reducing the labor and time required by the pipe expansion process.

Claims
  • 1. A steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process, wherein a value a/w is 0.038% or less, where a and w denote an amplitude and a wavelength of the waveform shape, respectively.
  • 2. The steel pipe according to claim 1, wherein a value w/λ defining a ratio of the wavelength w of the waveform shape to a Timoshenko's buckling wavelength λ is larger than 0.8.
  • 3. A steel pipe structure comprising the steel pipe according to claim 1.
  • 4. A method of manufacturing a steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process, comprising a step of forming the waveform shape such that a value a/w is 0.038% or less, where a and w denote an amplitude and a wavelength of the waveform shape, respectively.
  • 5. A method of designing a steel pipe having a waveform shape formed on an outer diameter thereof by a pipe expansion process, the method comprising: a step of evaluating, with respect to the steel pipe to be manufactured, a relationship between ratio w/λ and a buckling-time bending angle by using Equation (1), the ratio w/λ defining a ratio of a wavelength w of the waveform shape to a Timoshenko's buckling wavelength λ, and further determining the wavelength w and an amplitude a of the waveform shape, on a basis of a result of the evaluation:
  • 6. A steel pipe structure comprising the steel pipe according to claim 2.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2015-049513 Mar 2015 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2016/056999 3/7/2016 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/143743 9/15/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
3779312 Withers, Jr. Dec 1973 A
4007774 Withers, Jr. Feb 1977 A
4305460 Yampolsky Dec 1981 A
4330036 Satoh May 1982 A
T103901 Lupke et al. Feb 1984 I4
5680772 Furukawa Oct 1997 A
8354084 Tallis Jan 2013 B2
8555932 Twist Oct 2013 B2
8573260 Twist Nov 2013 B2
8839823 Twist Sep 2014 B2
8985160 Twist Mar 2015 B2
20140202576 Shitamoto Jul 2014 A1
20150090361 Tajika Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
2864280 Jan 2007 CN
2013-212521 Oct 2013 JP
2013-231506 Nov 2013 JP
5447461 Mar 2014 JP
2015-13314 Jan 2015 JP
1802446 Dec 1995 RU
2273540 Apr 2006 RU
1530292 Dec 1989 SU
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2018, of counterpart Chinese Application No. 201680014323.3 along with its Search Report in English.
Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2018, of counterpart Russian Application No. 2017131621 along with an English translation.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180104731 A1 Apr 2018 US