STEEL SHEET FOR CANS AND METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME

Abstract
Provided is a steel sheet for cans with high strength and sufficiently high formability particularly as a material for a can body with a neck portion. The steel sheet for cans of the present disclosure has a chemical composition containing, in mass %, C: 0.010% to 0.130%, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% to 1.00%, P: 0.007% to 0.100%, S: 0.0005% to 0.0090%, Al: 0.001% to 0.100%, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% to 0.1000%, B: 0.0005% to less than 0.0020%, and Cr: 0.08% or less, where 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 is satisfied; and a microstructure with a proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite of 3% or less, wherein an upper yield stress is 550 MPa to 620 MPa.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a steel sheet for cans and a method of producing the same.


BACKGROUND

There has been a demand for cost reduction in production of bodies and lids of food cans and beverage cans using steel sheets, and it is promoted, as a measure, to reduce the thickness of the steel sheets to be used to reduce the material costs. The steel sheets whose thickness is to be reduced are steel sheets used for can bodies of two-piece cans formed by drawing, can bodies of three-piece cans formed by cylinder forming, and can lids. Simply reducing the thickness of the steel sheets decreases the strength of can bodies and can lids, so that steel sheets for high-strength ultra-thin cans are desired for parts such as can bodies of draw-redraw (DRD) cans and welded cans.


The steel sheets for high-strength ultra-thin cans are produced with a Double Reduce method (hereinafter also referred to as “DR method”), in which secondary cold rolling with rolling reduction of 20% or more is performed after annealing. Steel sheets produced with the DR method (hereinafter also referred to as “DR material”) have high strength but low total elongation (poor ductility) and poor formability.


In a can body, the diameter of a can mouth is sometimes designed to be smaller than the diameter of other parts in order to reduce the material costs of a lid. The process of reducing the diameter of a can mouth is called neck forming, in which die neck forming using a press mold or spin neck forming using a rotating roller is performed on a can mouth to reduce the diameter of the can mouth and form a neck portion. When the material, such as the DR material, has high strength, dents due to buckling caused by local deformation of the material occur in the neck portion. Dents should be avoided because they impair the appearance of cans and decrease the commercial value. In addition, reducing the thickness of the material makes it easier to cause dents in the neck portion.


The DR material, which is generally used as a steel sheet for high-strength ultra-thin cans, is poor in ductility, and it is usually difficult to form the DR material into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, when the DR material is used, a product is obtained after many times of press mold adjustment and multi-stage forming. Further, because the DR material is strain hardened through secondary cold rolling to further increase the strength of the steel sheet, local deformation may occur during forming of the DR material as a result of the strain hardening being unevenly introduced into the steel sheet depending on the accuracy of the secondary cold rolling. This local deformation should be avoided because it causes dents in a neck portion of a can body.


To avoid such disadvantages of the DR material, methods of producing a high strength steel sheet using various strengthening methods have been proposed. JP H8-325670 A (PTL1) proposes a steel sheet having excellent deep drawability and flange formability during the production of cans and excellent surface shape after the production of cans by achieving high strength through refinement of the steel microstructure and optimizing the steel microstructure. JP 2004-183074 A (PTL 2) proposes a steel sheet for thin-walled deep-drawn ironed cans, which is soft during forming but can obtain a hard state through heat treatment after the forming by adjusting Mn, P and N to appropriate amounts in low-carbon steel. JP 2001-89828 A (PTL 3) proposes a steel sheet for three-piece cans having excellent workability in welded portion in which, for example, occurrence of neck wrinkles is suppressed and flange cracking resistance is improved by controlling the particle size of oxide-based inclusions. WO 2015/166653 (PTL 4) proposes a steel sheet for high-strength containers having a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more and elongation after fracture of 10% or more by increasing the N content to achieve high strength through solute N and controlling the dislocation density in the thickness direction of the steel sheet.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature

PTL 1: JP H8-325670 A


PTL 2: JP 2004-183074 A


PTL 3: JP 2001-89828 A


PTL 4: WO 2015/166653


SUMMARY
Technical Problem

As mentioned above, it is necessary to secure strength to reduce the thickness of a steel sheet for cans. On the other hand, when a steel sheet is used as a material for a can body with a neck portion, the steel sheet is required to have high ductility. Further, it is necessary to suppress local deformation of a steel sheet to suppress the occurrence of dent in a neck portion of a can body. However, with respect to these properties, the above conventional technologies are inferior in any of strength, ductility (total elongation), uniform deformability, or formability of neck portion.


PTL 1 proposes a steel having high strength and good balance with ductility by refinement of the steel microstructure and optimization of the steel microstructure. However, PTL 1 does not take local deformation of a steel sheet into consideration, and it is difficult to obtain a steel sheet that satisfies the formability required for a neck portion of a can body with the production method described in PTL 1.


PTL 2 proposes that the strength properties of cans should be enhanced by refinement of the steel microstructure through P and aging through N. However, the method of strengthening a steel sheet by adding P described in PTL 2 tends to cause local deformation of the steel sheet, and it is difficult to obtain a steel sheet that satisfies the formability required for a neck portion of a can body with the technology described in PTL 2.


In PTL 3, the desired strength is obtained by refinement of crystal grains using Nb and B. However, the tensile strength of the steel sheet of PTL 3 is less than 540 MPa, and the strength of the steel sheet is inferior as a steel sheet for high-strength ultra-thin cans. Further, the addition of Ca and REM is also essential from the viewpoints of formability of welded portion and surface characteristics, and the technology of PTL 3 has a problem of deteriorating corrosion resistance. Furthermore, PTL 3 does not take local deformation of a steel sheet into consideration, and it is difficult to obtain a steel sheet that satisfies the formability required for a neck portion of a can body with the production method described in PTL 3.


PTL 4 evaluates pressure resistance by forming a can lid using a steel sheet for high strength containers with a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more and elongation after fracture of 10% or more. However, PTL 4 does not take the shape of a neck portion of a can body into consideration, and it is difficult to obtain a good neck portion of a can body with the technology described in PTL 4.


It could thus be helpful to provide a steel sheet for cans with high strength and sufficiently high formability particularly as a material for a can body with a neck portion, and a method of producing the same.


Solution to Problem

We thus provide the following.


[1] A steel sheet for cans, comprising a chemical composition containing (consisting of), in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, B: 0.0005% or more and less than 0.0020%, and Cr: 0.08% or less, wherein, with Ti*=Ti−1.5S, 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 is satisfied, and the balance is Fe and inevitable impurities; and a microstructure with a proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite of 3% or less, wherein an upper yield stress is 550 MPa or more and 620 MPa or less.


[2] The steel sheet for cans according to [1], wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and V: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less.


[3] A method of producing a steel sheet for cans, comprising a hot rolling process wherein a steel slab comprising a chemical composition containing (consisting of), in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, B: 0.0005% or more and less than 0.0020%, and Cr: 0.08% or less, where, with Ti*=Ti−1.5S, 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 is satisfied, and the balance is Fe and inevitable impurities, is heated at 1200° C. or higher and subjected to rolling with a rolling finish temperature of 850° C. or higher to obtain a steel sheet, and the steel sheet is subjected to coiling at a temperature of 640° C. or higher and 780° C. or lower and then cooled at an average cooling rate of 25° C./h or higher and 55° C./h or lower from 500° C. to 300° C.; a cold rolling process wherein the steel sheet after the hot rolling process is subjected to cold rolling at rolling reduction of 86% or more; an annealing process wherein the steel sheet after the cold rolling process is held in a temperature range of 640° C. or higher and 780° C. or lower for 10 seconds or longer and 90 seconds or shorter, then the steel sheet is subjected to primary cooling to a temperature range of 500° C. or higher and 600° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 7° C./s or higher and 180° C./s or lower, and subsequently the steel sheet is subjected to secondary cooling to 300° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 0.1° C./s or higher and 10° C./s or lower; and a process wherein the steel sheet after the annealing process is subjected to temper rolling with rolling reduction of 0.1% or more and 3.0% or less.


[4] The method of producing a steel sheet for cans according to [3], wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and V: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less.


Advantageous Effect

According to the present disclosure, it is possible to obtain a steel sheet for cans having high strength and sufficiently high forming accuracy particularly as a material for a can body with a neck portion.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure will be described below based on embodiments. First, the chemical composition of a steel sheet for cans according to one embodiment of the present disclosure will be described. The unit in the chemical composition is “mass %”, which is simply indicated as “%” unless otherwise specified.


C: 0.010% or More and 0.130% or Less


It is important for the steel sheet for cans of the present embodiment to have an upper yield stress of 550 MPa or more. To achieve this, it is important to utilize strengthening by precipitation by Ti-based carbides formed by containing Ti. The C content in the steel sheet for cans is important in utilizing the strengthening by precipitation by Ti-based carbides. When the C content is less than 0.010%, the effect of increasing the strength by strengthening by precipitation described above is reduced, and the upper yield stress is less than 550 MPa. Therefore, the lower limit of the C content is set to 0.010% and is preferably 0.015% or more. On the other hand, when the C content is more than 0.130%, hypo-peritectic cracking occurs in a cooling process during steelmaking, and ductility deteriorates due to excessively hardening of the steel sheet. Further, the ratio of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3%, causing dents when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the upper limit of the C content is set to 0.130%. Furthermore, when the C content is 0.060% or less, the strength of a hot-rolled sheet is suppressed, the deformation resistance during cold rolling is further reduced, and surface defects are less likely to occur even if the rolling speed is increased. Therefore, the C content is preferably 0.060% or less from the viewpoint of ease of production. The C content is more preferably 0.015% or more and 0.060% or less.


Si: 0.04% or Less


Si is an element that increases the strength of steel by solid solution strengthening. To obtain this effect, the Si content is preferably 0.01% or more. However, when the Si content is more than 0.04%, corrosion resistance is significantly deteriorated. Therefore, the Si content is set to 0.04% or less. The Si content is preferably 0.03% or less. The Si content is more preferably 0.01% or more and 0.03% or less.


Mn: 0.10% or More and 1.00% or Less


Mn increases the strength of steel by solid solution strengthening. When the Mn content is less than 0.10%, an upper yield stress of 550 MPa or more cannot be secured. Therefore, the lower limit of the Mn content is set to 0.10%. On the other hand, when the Mn content is more than 1.00%, corrosion resistance and surface properties are deteriorated, and the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3%, causing local deformation and deteriorating uniform deformability. Therefore, the upper limit of the Mn content is set to 1.00%. The Mn content is preferably 0.20% or more. The Mn content is preferably 0.60% or less. The Mn content is more preferably 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less.


P: 0.007% or More and 0.100% or Less


P is an element having high solid solution strengthening ability. To obtain such an effect, it is necessary to contain P at an amount of 0.007% or more. Therefore, the lower limit of the P content is set to 0.007%. On the other hand, when the P content is more than 0.100%, the steel sheet is excessively hardened, which decreases ductility and further deteriorates corrosion resistance. Therefore, the upper limit of the P content is set to 0.100%. The P content is preferably 0.008% or more. The P content is preferably 0.015% or less. The P content is more preferably 0.008% or more and 0.015% or less.


S: 0.0005% or More and 0.0090% or Less


The steel sheet for cans of the present embodiment obtains high strength through strengthening by precipitation by Ti-based carbides. S tends to form TiS with Ti. When TiS is formed, the amount of Ti-based carbides useful for strengthening by precipitation is reduced, and high strength cannot be obtained. In other words, when the S content is more than 0.0090%, a large amount of TiS is formed, and the strength decreases. Therefore, the upper limit of the S content is set to 0.0090%. The S content is preferably 0.0080% or less. On the other hand, a S content of less than 0.0005% leads to excessive desulfurization costs. Therefore, the lower limit of the S content is set to 0.0005%.


Al: 0.001% or More and 0.100% or Less


Al is an element contained as a deoxidizer, and Al is also useful in the refinement of steel. When the Al content is less than 0.001%, the effect as a deoxidizer is insufficient, which causes the occurrence of solidification defects and increases steelmaking costs. Therefore, the lower limit of the Al content is set to 0.001%. On the other hand, when the Al content is more than 0.100% , surface defects may occur. Therefore, the upper limit of the Al content is set to 0.100% or less. The Al content is preferably 0.010% or more and 0.060% or less, because Al can act better as a deoxidizer in this case.


N: 0.0050% or Less


The steel sheet for cans of the present embodiment obtains high strength through strengthening by precipitation by Ti-based carbides. N tends to form TiN with Ti. When TiN is formed, the amount of Ti-based carbides useful for strengthening by precipitation is reduced, and high strength cannot be obtained. Further, when the N content is too high, slab cracking is likely to occur in a lower straightening zone where the temperature is lowered during continuous casting. Therefore, the upper limit of the N content is set to 0.0050%. The lower limit of the N content is not specified. However, the N content is preferably more than 0.0005% from the viewpoint of steelmaking costs.


Ti: 0.0050% or More and 0.1000% or Less


Ti is an element that has high carbide-forming ability and is effective in precipitating fine carbides. This increases the upper yield stress. In the present embodiment, the upper yield stress can be adjusted by adjusting the Ti content. This effect is obtained when the Ti content is 0.0050% or more, so that the lower limit of the Ti content is set to 0.0050%. On the other hand, Ti causes an increase in the recrystallization temperature. Therefore, when the Ti content is more than 0.1000%, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3% during annealing at 640° C. to 780° C., and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the upper limit of the Ti content is set to 0.1000%. The Ti content is preferably 0.0100% or more. The Ti content is preferably 0.0800% or less. The Ti content is more preferably 0.0100% or more and 0.0800% or less.


B: 0.0005% or More and Less than 0.0020%


B is effective in refining ferrite grains and increasing the upper yield stress. In the present embodiment, the upper yield stress can be adjusted by adjusting the B content. This effect is obtained when the B content is 0.0005% or more, so that the lower limit of the B content is set to 0.0005%. On the other hand, B causes an increase in the recrystallization temperature. Therefore, when the B content is 0.0020% or more, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3% during annealing at 640° C. to 780° C., and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the B content is set to less than 0.0020%. The B content is preferably 0.0006% or more. The B content is preferably 0.0018% or less. The B content is more preferably 0.0006% or more and 0.0018% or less.


Cr: 0.08% or Less


Cr is an element that forms carbonitrides. Cr carbonitrides contribute to increasing the strength of steel, although their strengthening ability is lower than that of Ti-based carbides. From the viewpoint of sufficiently obtaining this effect, the Cr content is preferably 0.001% or more. However, when the Cr content is more than 0.08%, Cr carbonitrides are excessively formed, the formation of Ti-based carbides, which contribute most to the strengthening of the steel, is suppressed, and the desired strength cannot be obtained. Therefore, the Cr content is set to 0.08% or less.


0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700


The value of (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is important for obtaining high strength and suppressing local deformation during forming. As used herein, Ti* is defined as Ti*=Ti−1.5S. Ti forms fine precipitates (Ti-based carbides) with C and contributes to increasing the strength of steel. The C that does not form Ti-based carbides exists in the steel as cementite or solute C. The solute C causes local deformation during working of the steel sheet, and dents occur when the steel sheet is worked into a neck portion of a can body. Further, Ti tends to combine with S to form TiS. When TiS is formed, the amount of Ti-based carbides useful for strengthening by precipitation is reduced, and high strength cannot be obtained. We found that by controlling the value of (Ti*/48)/(C/12), dents caused by local deformation during forming of the steel sheet can be suppressed while achieving high strength by Ti-based carbides, and completed the present disclosure. That is, when (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is less than 0.005, the amount of Ti-based carbides, which contribute to increasing the strength of the steel, is reduced, the upper yield stress is less than 550 MPa, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3%, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is set to 0.005 or more. On the other hand, when (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is more than 0.700, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3% during annealing at 640° C. to 780° C., and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is set to 0.700 or less. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is preferably 0.090 or more. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is preferably 0.400 or less. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is more preferably 0.090 or more and 0.400 or less.


The balance other than the above components is Fe and inevitable impurities.


The basic components of the present disclosure have been described above, and the present disclosure may appropriately contain the following elements as necessary.


Nb: 0.0050% or More and 0.0500% or Less


Nb, like Ti, is an element that has high carbide-forming ability and is effective in precipitating fine carbides. This increases the upper yield stress. In the present embodiment, the upper yield stress can be adjusted by adjusting the Nb content. This effect is obtained when the Nb content is 0.0050% or more. Therefore, when Nb is added, the lower limit of the Nb content is preferably 0.0050%. On the other hand, Nb causes an increase in the recrystallization temperature. Therefore, when the Nb content is more than 0.0500%, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3% during annealing at 640° C. to 780° C., and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, when Nb is added, the upper limit of the Nb content is preferably 0.0500%. The Nb content is more preferably 0.0080% or more. The Nb content is more preferably 0.0300% or less. The Nb content is still more preferably 0.0080% or more and 0.0300% or less.


Mo: 0.0050% or More and 0.0500% or Less


Mo, like Ti and Nb, is an element that has high carbide-forming ability and is effective in precipitating fine carbides. This increases the upper yield stress. In the present embodiment, the upper yield stress can be adjusted by adjusting the Mo content. This effect is obtained when the Mo content is 0.0050% or more. Therefore, when Mo is added, the lower limit of the Mo content is preferably 0.0050%. On the other hand, Mo causes an increase in the recrystallization temperature. Therefore, when the Mo content is more than 0.0500%, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3% during annealing at 640° C. to 780° C., and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, when Mo is added, the upper limit of the Mo content is preferably 0.0500%. The Mo content is more preferably 0.0080% or more. The Mo content is more preferably 0.0300% or less. The Mo content is still more preferably 0.0080% or more and 0.0300% or less.


V: 0.0050% or More and 0.0500% or Less


V is effective in refining ferrite grains and increasing the upper yield stress. In the present embodiment, the upper yield stress can be adjusted by adjusting the V content. This effect is obtained when the V content is 0.0050% or more. Therefore, when V is added, the lower limit of the V content is preferably 0.0050%. On the other hand, V causes an increase in the recrystallization temperature. Therefore, when the V content is more than 0.0500%, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3% during annealing at 640° C. to 780° C., and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, when V is added, the upper limit of the V content is preferably 0.0500%. The V content is more preferably 0.0080% or more. The V content is more preferably 0.0300% or less. The V content is still more preferably 0.0080% or more and 0.0300% or less.


Next, the mechanical properties of the steel sheet for cans of the present embodiment will be described.


Upper Yield Stress: 550 MPa or More and 620 MPa or Less


The upper yield stress of the steel sheet is set to 550 MPa or more in order to secure the denting strength, which is the strength against dents of a welded can, the pressure resistance of a can lid, and the like. On the other hand, when the upper yield stress of the steel sheet is more than 620 MPa, dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the upper yield stress of the steel sheet is set to 550 MPa or more and 620 MPa or less.


The yield stress can be measured with a metal material tensile test method specified in “JIS Z 2241:2011”. The yield stress described above can be obtained by adjusting the chemical composition, the coiling temperature in a hot rolling process, the cooling rate in a cooling process after coiling in a hot rolling process, the rolling reduction in a cold rolling process, the soaking temperature and the holding time in an annealing process, the cooling rate in an annealing process, and the rolling reduction in a temper rolling process. Specifically, a yield stress of 550 MPa or more and 620 MPa or less can be obtained by setting the chemical composition as described above, setting the coiling temperature in a hot rolling process to 640° C. or higher and 780° C. or lower, setting the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling to 25° C./h or higher and 55° C./h or lower, setting the rolling reduction in a cold rolling process to 86% or more, in an annealing process, setting the holding time in a temperature range of 640° C. or higher and 780° C. or lower to 10 seconds or longer and 90 seconds or shorter, performing primary cooling to a temperature range of 500° C. or higher and 600° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 7° C./s or higher and 180° C./s or lower and performing secondary cooling to 300° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 0.1° C./s or higher and 10° C./s or lower, and setting the rolling reduction in a temper rolling process to 0.1% or more and 3.0% or less.


Next, the metallic structure of the steel sheet for cans of the present disclosure will be described.


Proportion of Non-Recrystallized Ferrite: 3% or Less


When the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure is more than 3%, dents occur due to local deformation during forming, for example, when forming the steel sheet into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure is set to 3% or less. Although the mechanism of occurrence of local deformation during forming is not clear, it is inferred that the presence of a large amount of non-recrystallized ferrite leads to the imbalance of the interaction between non-recrystallized ferrite and dislocation during forming, which causes the occurrence of dent. The proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure is preferably 2.7% or less. The proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure is preferably 0.5% or more, because the annealing temperature can be relatively low in this case. The proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure is more preferably 0.8% or more.


The proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure can be measured with the following method. After polishing a cross section in the thickness direction parallel to the rolling direction of the steel sheet, the cross section is etched with an etching solution (3 vol % nital). Next, an optical microscopy is used to observe an area from a position at a depth of ¼ sheet thickness (a position of ¼ sheet thickness in the thickness direction from the surface in the cross section) to a position of ½ sheet thickness in ten locations at 400 times magnification. Next, non-recrystallized ferrite is identified visually using micrographs taken by the optical microscopy, and the area ratio of non-recrystallized ferrite is determined by image interpretation. As used herein, the non-recrystallized ferrite is a metallic structure that is elongated in the rolling direction under an optical microscopy at 400 times magnification. The area ratio of non-recrystallized ferrite is determined in each location, and the average value of the area ratios of the ten locations is used as the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure.


Sheet Thickness: 0.4 mm or Less


Sheet metal thinning of steel sheets is being promoted for the purpose of reducing costs of can production. However, the sheet metal thinning of steel sheets, that is, the reduction of steel sheet thickness may lead to a decrease in can body strength and shaping defects during forming. With this respect, the steel sheet for cans of the present embodiment neither decreases the can body strength such as the pressure resistance of a can lid, nor causes forming defects such as dents during forming, even if the sheet thickness is small. In other words, the effects of the present disclosure of high strength and high forming accuracy are remarkably exhibited in a case of a small sheet thickness. Therefore, the sheet thickness of the steel sheet for cans is preferably 0.4 mm or less from this viewpoint. The sheet thickness may be 0.3 mm or less or 0.2 mm or less.


Next, a method of producing a steel sheet for cans according to one embodiment of the present disclosure will be described. Hereinafter, the temperature is based on the surface temperature of the steel sheet. The average cooling rate is a value obtained by calculation based on the surface temperature of the steel sheet as follows. For example, the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. is expressed by {(500° C.)−(300° C.)}/(cooling time from 500° C. to 300° C.).


During the production of a steel sheet for cans according to the present embodiment, molten steel is adjusted to have the chemical composition described above with a known method using a converter or the like, and then the steel is, for example, subjected to continuous casting to obtain a slab.


Slab Heating Temperature: 1200° C. or Higher


When the slab heating temperature in a hot rolling process is lower than 1200° C., non-recrystallized microstructure remains in the steel sheet after annealing, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the lower limit of the slab heating temperature is set to 1200° C. The slab heating temperature is preferably 1220° C. or higher. The upper limit of the slab heating temperature is preferably 1350° C. because the effect is saturated even if the temperature exceeds 1350° C.


Rolling Finish Temperature: 850° C. or Higher


When the finish temperature of a hot rolling process is lower than 850° C., non-recrystallized microstructure caused by the non-recrystallized microstructure of the hot-rolled steel sheet remains in the steel sheet after annealing, and dents occur due to local deformation during forming of the steel sheet. Therefore, the lower limit of the rolling finish temperature is set at 850° C. On the other hand, the rolling finish temperature is preferably 950° C. or lower, because in this case, scale formation on the surface of the steel sheet is suppressed, and better surface characteristics can be obtained.


Coiling Temperature: 640° C. or Higher and 780° C. or Lower


When the coiling temperature in a hot rolling process is lower than 640° C., a large amount of cementite precipitates in the hot-rolled steel sheet. As a result, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure after annealing exceeds 3%, and dents occur due to local deformation when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the lower limit of the coiling temperature is set to 640° C. On the other hand, when the coiling temperature is higher than 780° C., a part of ferrite of the steel sheet after continuous annealing is coarsened, the steel sheet is softened, and the upper yield stress is less than 550 MPa. Therefore, the upper limit of the coiling temperature is set to 780° C. The coiling temperature is preferably 660° C. or higher. The coiling temperature is preferably 760° C. or lower. The coiling temperature is more preferably 660° C. or higher and 760° C. or lower.


Average Cooling Rate from 500° C. to 300° C.: 25° C./h or Higher and 55° C./h or Lower


When the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is lower than 25° C./h, a large amount of cementite precipitates in the hot-rolled steel sheet. As a result, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure after annealing exceeds 3%, and dents occur due to local deformation when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. In addition, the amount of fine Ti-based carbides that contribute to strength is reduced, and the strength of the steel sheet is decreased. Therefore, the lower limit of the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is set to 25° C./h. On the other hand, when the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is higher than 55° C./h, the amount of solute C in the steel increases, and dents occur due to the solute C when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the upper limit of the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is set to 55° C./h. The average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is preferably 30° C./h or higher. The average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is preferably 50° C./h or lower. The average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after coiling is more preferably 30° C./h or higher and 50° C./h or lower. The above average cooling rate can be achieved by air cooling. Note that the “average cooling rate” is based on the average temperature between the edge and the center in the coil width direction.


Acid Cleaning


Subsequently, it is preferable to perform acid cleaning if necessary. The conditions of acid cleaning are not limited as long as surface scales can be removed. Methods other than acid cleaning may also be used to remove scales.


Rolling Reduction in Cold Rolling: 86% or More


When the rolling reduction in a cold rolling process is less than 86%, the strain applied to the steel sheet by cold rolling is reduced, making it difficult to obtain an upper yield stress of 550 MPa or more for the steel sheet after annealing. Therefore, the rolling reduction in a cold rolling process is set to 86% or more. The rolling reduction in a cold rolling process is preferably 87% or more. The rolling reduction in a cold rolling process is preferably 94% or less. The rolling reduction in a cold rolling process is more preferably 87% or more and 94% or less. Other processes, such as an annealing process to soften the hot-rolled sheet, may be included as appropriate after the hot rolling process and before the cold rolling process. The cold rolling process may be performed immediately after the hot rolling process without acid cleaning.


Holding Temperature: 640° C. or Higher and 780° C. or Lower


When the holding temperature in an annealing process is higher than 780° C., sheet passing problems such as heat buckling are likely to occur during annealing. In addition, ferrite grains of the steel sheet are partially coarsened, the steel sheet is softened, and the upper yield stress is less than 550 MPa. Therefore, the holding temperature is set to 780° C. or lower. On the other hand, when the annealing temperature is lower than 640° C., recrystallization of ferrite grains is incomplete, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3%, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the holding temperature is set to 640° C. or higher. The holding temperature is preferably 660° C. or higher. The holding temperature is preferably 740° C. or lower. The holding temperature is more preferably 660° C. or higher and 740° C. or lower.


Holding Time in Temperature Range of 640° C. or Higher and 780° C. or Lower: 10 Seconds or Longer but 90 Seconds or Shorter


When the holding time is longer than 90 seconds, Ti-based carbides precipitated mainly in a coiling process during hot rolling are coarsened as the temperature rises, resulting in a decrease in strength. On the other hand, when the holding time is shorter than 10 seconds, recrystallization of ferrite grains is incomplete, non-recrystallized grains remain, the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite exceeds 3%, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body.


A continuous annealing device may be used for annealing. Other processes, such as an annealing process to soften the hot-rolled sheet, may be included as appropriate after the cold rolling process and before the annealing process, or the annealing process may be performed immediately after the cold rolling process.


Primary Cooling: Cooling at Average Cooling Rate of 7° C./s or Higher and 180° C./s or Lower to Temperature Range of 500° C. or Higher and 600° C. or Lower


After the holding, the steel sheet is cooled to a temperature range of 500° C. or higher and 600° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 7° C./s or higher and 180° C./s or lower. When the average cooling rate is higher than 180° C./s, the steel sheet is excessively hardened, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. On the other hand, when the average cooling rate is lower than 7° C./s, Ti-based carbides are coarsened, and the strength decreases. The average cooling rate is preferably 20° C./s or higher. The average cooling rate is preferably 160° C./s or lower. The average cooling rate is more preferably 20° C./s or higher and 160° C./s or lower. When the cooling stop temperature in the primary cooling after holding is lower than 500° C., the steel sheet is excessively hardened, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the cooling stop temperature is set to 500° C. or higher. The cooling stop temperature in the primary cooling after holding is preferably 520° C. or higher. When the cooling stop temperature in the primary cooling after holding is higher than 600° C., Ti-based carbides are coarsened, and the strength decreases. Therefore, the cooling stop temperature is set to 600° C. or lower.


Secondary Cooling: Cooling at an Average Cooling Rate of 0.1° C./s or Higher and 10° C./s or Lower to 300° C. or Lower


In secondary cooling after the primary cooling, the steel sheet is cooled to a temperature range of 300° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 0.1° C./s or higher and 10° C./s or lower. When the average cooling rate is higher than 10° C./s, the steel sheet is excessively hardened, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. On the other hand, when the average cooling rate is lower than 0.1° C./s, Ti-based carbides are coarsened, and the strength decreases. The average cooling rate is preferably 1.0° C./s or higher. The average cooling rate is preferably 8.0° C./s or lower. The average cooling rate is more preferably 1.0° C./s or higher and 8.0° C./s or lower. In the secondary cooling, the steel sheet is cooled to 300° C. or lower. When the secondary cooling is stopped at a temperature higher than 300° C., the steel sheet is excessively hardened, and dents occur when the steel sheet is formed into a neck portion of a can body. It is preferable to perform the secondary cooling to 290° C. or lower.


Rolling Reduction in Temper Rolling: 0.1% or More and 3.0% or Less


When the rolling reduction in temper rolling after the annealing is more than 3.0%, too much strain hardening is introduced into the steel sheet. As a result, the strength of the steel sheet may be excessively increased, and dents may occur during forming of the steel sheet, for example, when forming the steel sheet into a neck portion of a can body. Therefore, the rolling reduction in temper rolling is set to 3.0% or less and is preferably 1.6% or less. On the other hand, the temper rolling plays a role of imparting surface roughness to the steel sheet. To impart uniform surface roughness to the steel sheet and to obtain an upper yield stress of 550 MPa or more, it is necessary to set the rolling reduction of temper rolling to 0.1% or more. The temper rolling process may be performed in the annealing device or may be performed as an independent rolling process.


The steel sheet for cans of the present embodiment can be obtained as described above. In the present disclosure, various processes may further be performed after the temper rolling. For example, the steel sheet for cans of the present disclosure may have a coating or plating layer on the steel sheet surface. Examples of the coating or plating layer include a Sn coating or plating layer, a Cr coating or plating layer such as a tin-free one, a Ni coating or plating layer, and a Sn-Ni coating or plating layer. In addition, paint baking treatment, film lamination, and other processes may also be performed. Because the thickness of the coating or plating, the laminated film or the like is very small compared with the sheet thickness, the effects of these on the mechanical properties of the steel sheet for cans can be ignored.


EXAMPLES

Steels having the chemical compositions listed in Table 1, each with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, were prepared by steelmaking in a converter and subjected to continuous casting to obtain steel slabs. Next, the steel slabs were subjected to hot rolling under the hot rolling conditions listed in Tables 2 and 3 and to acid cleaning after the hot rolling. Next, cold rolling was performed with the rolling reduction listed in Tables 2 and 3, continuous annealing was performed under the annealing conditions listed in Tables 2 and 3, and subsequently temper rolling was performed with the rolling reduction listed in Tables 2 and 3 to obtain steel sheets. The steel sheets were continuously subjected to ordinary Sn coating or plating to obtain Sn-coated or Sn-plated steel sheets (tin plates) with a coating weight of 11.2 g/m2 per surface. Next, the Sn-coated or Sn-plated steel sheets were subjected to heat treatment equivalent to paint baking treatment at 210° C. for 10 minutes and then subjected to the following evaluations.


<Tensile Test>


A tensile test was performed in accordance with a metal material tensile test method specified in “JIS Z 2241:2011”. That is, a JIS No. 5 tensile test piece (JIS Z 2201) was collected so that the tensile direction was perpendicular to the rolling direction, a 50 mm (L) mark was added to the parallel portion of the tensile test piece, a tensile test in accordance with the provisions of JIS Z 2241 was performed at a tensile speed of 10 mm/min until the tensile test piece broke, and the upper yield stress was measured. The measurement results are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.


<Investigation of Metallic Structure>


A cross section of each Sn-coated or Sn-plated steel sheet in the thickness direction parallel to the rolling direction was polished and then etched with an etching solution (3 vol % nital). Next, an optical microscopy was used to observe an area from a position at a depth of ¼ sheet thickness (a position of ¼ sheet thickness in the thickness direction from the surface in the cross section) to a position of ½ sheet thickness in ten locations at 400 times magnification. Next, non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure was identified visually using micrographs taken by the optical microscopy, and the area ratio of non-recrystallized ferrite was determined by image interpretation. As used herein, the non-recrystallized ferrite was a metallic structure that was elongated in the rolling direction under an optical microscopy at 400 times magnification. Next, the area ratio of non-recrystallized ferrite was determined in each location, and the average value of the area ratios of the ten locations was used as the proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite in the metallic structure. Image interpretation software (Particle Analysis made by NIPPON STEEL TECHNOLOGY Co., Ltd.) was used for the image interpretation. The investigation results are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.


<Corrosion Resistance>


For each Sn-coated or Sn-plated steel sheet, an area with a measurement area of 2.7 mm2 was observed using an optical microscopy at 50 times magnification, and the number of hole-shaped positions where the Sn coating or plating was thin was measured. When the number of hole-shaped positions was less than 20, it was evaluated as good; when the number of hole-shaped positions was 20 or more and 25 or less, it was evaluated as fair; and when the number of hole-shaped positions was more than 25, it was evaluated as poor. The observation results are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.


<Occurrence of Dent>


A square blank was collected from each steel sheet and successively subjected to rolling, wire seam welding and neck forming to prepare a can body. The neck portion of the prepared can body was visually observed at eight locations in the circumferential direction to check for occurrence of dent. The evaluation results are listed in Table 2 and Table 3. When a dent occurred in any of the eight locations in the circumferential direction, it was evaluated as “occurrence of dent: yes”; and when no dent occurred in any of the eight locations in the circumferential direction, it was evaluated as “occurrence of dent: no”.









TABLE 1







(mass %)





















Steel
















sample


No.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
Ti
Cr
B
Nb
Mo
V
Remarks
























1
0.029
0.01
0.53
0.009
0.0047
0.031
0.0042
0.064
0.021
0.0014
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


2
0.036
0.03
0.44
0.008
0.0052
0.049
0.0045
0.058
0.025
0.0013
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


3
0.049
0.01
0.39
0.010
0.0055
0.037
0.0041
0.062
0.027
0.0013
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


4
0.016
0.01
0.43
0.010
0.0049
0.039
0.0039
0.051
0.019
0.0011
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


5
0.112
0.01
0.41
0.008
0.0063
0.052
0.0043
0.067
0.024
0.0012
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


6
0.038
0.01
0.14
0.008
0.0054
0.046
0.0043
0.025
0.036
0.0013
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


7
0.024
0.01
0.86
0.007
0.0051
0.049
0.0038
0.044
0.023
0.0015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


8
0.037
0.02
0.57
0.009
0.0056
0.054
0.0046
0.058
0.028
0.0014
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


9
0.041
0.01
0.20
0.008
0.0062
0.036
0.0040
0.036
0.032
0.0012
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


10
0.035
0.02
0.42
0.008
0.0057
0.048
0.0042
0.053
0.005
0.0016
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


11
0.044
0.01
0.51
0.009
0.0035
0.051
0.0044
0.047
0.026
0.0015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


12
0.028
0.02
0.45
0.010
0.0053
0.037
0.0041
0.055
0.066
0.0014
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


13
0.013
0.01
0.53
0.010
0.0068
0.044
0.0039
0.029
0.025
0.0015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


14
0.046
0.02
0.48
0.009
0.0084
0.050
0.0046
0.049
0.034
0.0012
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


15
0.038
0.01
0.42
0.008
0.0077
0.047
0.0043
0.013
0.027
0.0009
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


16
0.042
0.01
0.46
0.010
0.0062
0.060
0.0035
0.038
0.020
0.0011
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


17
0.045
0.02
0.53
0.011
0.0055
0.053
0.0049
0.030
0.026
0.0017
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


18
0.039
0.01
0.35
0.010
0.0028
0.046
0.0042
0.046
0.031
0.0016
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


19
0.027
0.01
0.52
0.009
0.0066
0.054
0.0019
0.044
0.029
0.0008
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


20
0.034
0.02
0.43
0.011
0.0059
0.042
0.0023
0.053
0.032
0.0010
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


21
0.029
0.01
0.47
0.008
0.0064
0.051
0.0047
0.026
0.018
0.0016
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


22
0.043
0.01
0.50
0.010
0.0058
0.038
0.0042
0.011
0.025
0.0007
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


23
0.036
0.01
0.49
0.012
0.0072
0.057
0.0045
0.079
0.024
0.0016
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


24
0.048
0.02
0.51
0.009
0.0056
0.039
0.0043
0.052
0.031
0.0019
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


25
0.044
0.01
0.48
0.009
0.0061
0.043
0.0038
0.035
0.033
0.0005
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


26
0.037
0.01
0.46
0.011
0.0070
0.052
0.0043
0.047
0.029
0.0015
tr.
tr.
0.034
Example


27
0.042
0.02
0.44
0.008
0.0053
0.051
0.0041
0.051
0.037
0.0017
tr.
0.028
tr.
Example


28
0.026
0.01
0.52
0.009
0.0065
0.046
0.0041
0.036
0.025
0.0014
0.036
tr.
tr.
Example


29
0.055
0.02
0.37
0.010
0.0048
0.053
0.0039
0.043
0.032
0.0016
0.024
0.027
tr.
Example


30
0.038
0.01
0.45
0.010
0.0056
0.038
0.0042
0.027
0.031
0.0013
0.021
tr.
0.032
Example


31

0.194

0.01
0.51
0.011
0.0062
0.044
0.0045
0.064
0.024
0.0015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


32

0.136

0.02
0.48
0.008
0.0054
0.038
0.0041
0.052
0.033
0.0016
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


33
0.038
0.01
0.53
0.010

0.0175

0.053
0.0043
0.060
0.028
0.0014
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


34
0.024
0.01
0.47
0.011
0.0061
0.047
0.0041
0.055

0.124

0.0018
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


35

0.005

0.02
0.39
0.009
0.0058
0.052
0.0042
0.021
0.036
0.0008
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


36

0.008

0.01
0.45
0.010
0.0056
0.055
0.0046
0.019
0.027
0.0009
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


37
0.042

0.09

0.54
0.011
0.0073
0.048
0.0045
0.042
0.038
0.0013
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


38
0.029
0.02

1.73

0.010
0.0054
0.039
0.0043
0.053
0.021
0.0015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


39
0.057
0.01

0.02

0.011
0.0062
0.051
0.0046
0.038
0.046
0.0017
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


40
0.036
0.01
0.37

0.154

0.0064
0.050
0.0045
0.050
0.033
0.0014
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


41
0.053
0.02
0.42
0.009
0.0055
0.038

0.0232

0.064
0.029
0.0018
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


42
0.048
0.02
0.39
0.009
0.0063
0.046

0.0184

0.057
0.017
0.0017
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


43
0.069
0.02
0.46
0.011
0.0071
0.053
0.0044

0.193

0.035
0.0019
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


44
0.056
0.01
0.50
0.010
0.0064
0.046
0.0037

0.151

0.028
0.0013
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


45
0.017
0.01
0.45
0.012
0.0015
0.039
0.0046

0.003

0.042
0.0014
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


46
0.044
0.02
0.53
0.009
0.0037
0.057
0.0044
0.048
0.037

0.0003

tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


47
0.039
0.01
0.54
0.010
0.0052
0.048
0.0044
0.026
0.024

0.0021

tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


48
0.053
0.01
0.37
0.008
0.0066
0.052
0.0046
0.061
0.031

0.0027

0.026
tr.
tr.
Comparative
















Example


49
0.048
0.02
0.44
0.011
0.0053
0.053
0.0039
0.053
0.028

0.0023

tr.
0.041
tr.
Comparative
















Example





Note that underline indicates it is outside the scope of the present disclosure.
















TABLE 2









Hot rolling process












Cooling

Annealing process

























rate at

Cold





Second-







500° C.
Hot-
rolling



Primary

ary




Slab
Rolling

to
rolled
process



cooling
Second-
cooling


Steel

heating
finish
Coiling
300° C.
sheet
Rolling
Soaking
Soaking
Primary
stop
ary
stop


sheet
Steel
temper-
temper-
temper-
after
thick-
reduc-
temper-
holding
cooling
temper-
cooling
temper-


sample
sample
ature
ature
ature
coiling
ness
tion
ature
time
rate
ature
rate
ature


No.
No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C./h)
(mm)
(%)
(° C.)
(s)
(° C./s)
(° C.)
(° C./s)
(° C.)





1
1
1225
905
685
43
2.5
92
725
29
53
540
3.7
275


2
2
1205
900
660
35
2.3
92
750
75
75
555
7.1
260


3
3
1220
895
690
37
2.5
91
710
33
68
515
4.5
265


4
4
1210
890
675
26
1.8
89
695
86
51
575
2.8
280


5
5
1215
870
705
39
2.3
92
730
41
124
505
4.3
270


6
6
1225
895
680
41
2.3
91
680
69
49
550
1.9
285


7
7
1240
915
720
53
1.9
91
705
34
27
595
8.7
250


8
8
1235
900
705
33
2.5
92
715
52
55
550
4.6
285


9
9
1210
860
695
46
2.5
90
720
28
92
575
5.2
260


10
10
1230
885
665
31
2.0
89
705
36
76
540
3.6
270


11
11
1205
875
690
35
2.3
89
710
44
66
560
7.3
255


12
12
1200
860
645
42
1.8
90
690
73
104
505
0.8
295


13
13
1215
870
680
29
1.8
91
665
19
139
505
1.6
275


14
14
1230
880
730
36
1.9
89
755
50
126
510
3.2
280


15
15
1240
905
695
33
1.7
87
685
47
80
535
3.8
265


16
16
1215
895
680
42
2.4
92
705
35
52
550
4.2
260


17
17
1235
915
675
51
3.2
94
730
77
118
530
1.1
290


18
18
1255
915
660
26
2.6
92
670
42
97
520
2.4
245


19
19
1265
920
710
53
2.5
90
680
23
63
560
4.6
250


20
20
1240
905
700
32
2.5
92
700
56
44
575
6.0
280


21
21
1250
935
690
44
2.5
90
725
30
71
545
5.7
275


22
22
1280
940
705
27
2.6
90
695
39
65
560
6.4
280


23
23
1230
895
690
45
2.3
90
740
71
39
590
9.6
260


24
24
1220
890
665
38
2.4
89
715
48
102
535
5.0
290


25
25
1220
880
660
35
2.0
91
675
34
87
550
4.3
270


26
26
1205
855
685
43
2.0
91
705
52
54
535
3.9
275


27
27
1215
885
705
28
2.4
91
730
37
122
540
3.5
285


28
28
1230
890
690
40
2.4
92
710
46
48
550
7.8
255


29
29
1225
900
680
33
2.0
90
725
75
90
550
4.4
275


30
30
1220
885
670
36
2.6
91
715
53
67
530
5.2
280


31
31
1235
900
705
41
2.5
90
740
35
42
555
4.7
270


32
32
1210
885
665
37
2.2
91
725
71
28
580
5.3
265


33
33
1240
860
690
52
2.4
91
690
43
56
560
3.6
275


34
34
1225
905
710
38
2.3
93
715
55
74
535
2.8
270


35
35
1230
880
685
29
2.0
92
670
30
128
515
1.9
280


36
36
1210
895
705
40
1.8
90
660
68
87
570
7.2
255


37
37
1235
905
645
51
1.8
88
700
29
103
560
4.5
265


38
38
1215
900
660
39
2.2
92
730
63
26
595
1.3
295


39
39
1205
875
695
43
2.5
92
695
37
141
505
8.7
255


40
40
1210
855
710
44
1.9
90
720
42
75
520
6.4
270


41
41
1250
870
680
35
2.6
91
710
56
92
515
7.7
260


42
42
1270
930
695
37
3.2
94
690
38
68
530
5.8
265


43
43
1225
880
705
52
2.4
90
715
44
54
545
3.0
280


44
44
1230
910
670
28
2.3
91
685
62
77
540
4.9
285


45
45
1215
890
685
46
2.3
92
670
37
115
585
3.6
280


46
46
1240
905
700
39
2.3
90
690
54
90
560
4.4
280


47
47
1220
910
725
42
2.5
91
720
48
49
545
3.7
270


48
48
1235
890
665
35
2.5
90
710
32
83
520
2.9
275


49
49
1215
890
680
50
2.1
91
715
66
61
535
3.1
270


















Temper rolling

Propor-
Upper





process

tion of
yield














Final

non-
stress
Evaluation


















Steel
Rolling
sheet

recrystal-
in
Corro-
Dent




sheet
reduc-
thick-

lized
rolling
sion
in



sample
tion
ness
(Ti*/48)/
ferrite
direction
resist-
neck



No.
(%)
(mm)
(C/12)
(%)
(MPa)
ance
portion
Remarks







1
1.2
0.20
0.491
2.5
591
Good
No
Example



2
1.6
0.18
0.349
2.8
559
Good
No
Example



3
0.9
0.22
0.274
1.4
594
Good
No
Example



4
1.4
0.20
0.682
2.2
577
Good
No
Example



5
1.0
0.18
0.128
2.7
617
Good
No
Example



6
1.5
0.20
0.111
1.6
561
Good
No
Example



7
2.3
0.17
0.379
2.6
606
Good
No
Example



8
1.9
0.20
0.335
2.5
602
Good
No
Example



9
1.1
0.25
0.163
1.7
565
Good
No
Example



10
1.7
0.22
0.318
2.4
559
Good
No
Example



11
2.6
0.25
0.237
2.6
573
Good
No
Example



12
0.5
0.18
0.420
2.7
605
Good
No
Example



13
0.3
0.16
0.362
0.8
556
Good
No
Example



14
2.1
0.20
0.198
1.2
564
Good
No
Example



15
0.4
0.22
0.010
2.5
592
Good
No
Example



16
2.0
0.19
0.171
2.5
603
Good
No
Example



17
2.8
0.19
0.121
2.7
613
Good
No
Example



18
1.3
0.21
0.268
2.4
561
Good
No
Example



19
2.2
0.24
0.316
1.3
576
Good
No
Example



20
1.1
0.20
0.325
1.8
595
Good
No
Example



21
0.8
0.25
0.141
2.3
604
Good
No
Example



22
1.5
0.26
0.013
0.7
587
Good
No
Example



23
2.4
0.22
0.474
1.1
612
Good
No
Example



24
1.8
0.26
0.227
2.5
606
Good
No
Example



25
0.7
0.18
0.147
1.6
563
Good
No
Example



26
0.9
0.18
0.247
2.3
579
Good
No
Example



27
2.2
0.21
0.256
2.5
590
Good
No
Example



28
1.8
0.19
0.252
2.1
594
Good
No
Example



29
2.1
0.20
0.163
2.6
614
Good
No
Example



30
1.4
0.23
0.122
2.5
603
Good
No
Example



31
2.2
0.24
0.070

11.7


664

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



32
1.7
0.19
0.081

9.4


650

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



33
1.2
0.21
0.222
2.8

516

Good
No
Comparative











Example



34
2.5
0.16
0.478
2.9

523

Good
No
Comparative











Example



35
1.6
0.16
0.615
1.2

494

Good
No
Comparative











Example



36
0.9
0.18

0.925

0.8

468

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



37
1.3
0.21
0.185
2.7
569
Poor
No
Comparative











Example



38
1.5
0.17
0.387

13.3

581
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



39
2.7
0.19
0.126
2.8

497

Good
No
Comparative











Example



40
2.4
0.19
0.281
2.9

662

Poor
Yes
Comparative











Example



41
1.8
0.23
0.263
2.8

515

Good
No
Comparative











Example



42
1.1
0.19
0.248
2.8

529

Good
No
Comparative











Example



43
1.5
0.24

0.844


6.0

594
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



44
2.0
0.20
0.631

6.0

587
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



45
0.8
0.18

0.003


12.0


496

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



46
1.2
0.23
0.241
2.7

483

Good
No
Comparative











Example



47
0.5
0.22
0.117

6.2

556
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



48
1.4
0.25
0.241

7.4

595
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



49
2.3
0.18
0.235

9.5

602
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example







Note that underline indicates it is outside the scope of the present disclosure.
















TABLE 3









Hot rolling process












Cooling

Annealing process

























rate at

Cold





Second-







500° C.
Hot-
rolling



Primary

ary




Slab
Rolling

to
rolled
process



cooling
Second-
cooling


Steel

heating
finish
Coiling
300° C.
sheet
Rolling
Soaking
Soaking
Primary
stop
ary
stop


sheet
Steel
temper-
temper-
temper-
after
thick-
reduc-
temper-
holding
cooling
temper-
cooling
temper-


sample
sample
ature
ature
ature
coiling
ness
tion
ature
time
rate
ature
rate
ature


No.
No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C./h)
(mm)
(%)
(° C.)
(s)
(° C./s)
(° C.)
(° C./s)
(° C.)





50
3
1240
890
710
31
2.0
89
680
79
34
575
8.9
255


51
3

1080

910
685
45
2.0
92
725
31
90
540
2.3
285


52
3
1215

790

650
42
2.3
92
760
45
135
520
2.1
270


53
3
1230
930

800

37
2.0
90
710
63
117
520
1.5
290


54
3
1220
895
680
37
2.0
90
690
50
52
550
7.0
260


55
3
1205
905
705
52
1.7

84

705
28
73
540
1.9
270


56
9
1225
890
650
41
2.5
90

600

42
28
585
7.6
260


57
9
1210
885
690
35
1.8
89
680
76
46
545
5.3
275


58
9
1235
910
665
35
1.8
91
690
35
51
555
3.9
280


59
9
1220
905
670
35
2.4
91

825

19
147
505
0.4
285


60
9
1220
900
660
28
2.2
88
695

114

25
590
7.8
250


61
9
1230
915
680
36
2.4
90
660

7

49
560
5.5
265


62
9
1200
900
690
52
2.0
88
650
53

5

585
1.2
290


63
9
1250
930
710
44
2.0
92
675
37

214

515
1.7
270


64
9
1225
910
700
29
2.0
90
730
44
60
540
4.3
245


65
15
1220
905
670
32
1.7
90
715
40
83

445

5.6
275


66
15
1210
890
715
37
1.7
90
700
29
15

660

4.1
280


67
15
1215
895
710
50
2.3
90
685
57
62
520
1.9
280


68
15
1230
905
680
38
2.3
89
710
36
107
510
0.04
290


69
15
1215
890
680
27
1.9
91
720
48
88
530

28.3

245


70
24
1240
920
715

14

1.9
91
730
26
94
525
3.0
280


71
24
1250
925
675

96

2.2
92
715
59
57
550
4.4
270


72
24
1205
865

490

48
2.2
92
700
61
44
570
8.6
265


73
24
1210
870
670
34
2.2
90
690
37
35
580
7.7
270


74
24
1230
890
695
51
2.5
90
705
45
67
545
3.8

405



75
24
1225
900
710
38
2.5
92
685
27
52
550
4.2
260


76
28
1240
910
670
52
3.2
92
695
73
70
535
5.5
255


77
28
1215
875
655
33
3.2
92
720
52
123
515
0.9
285


78
28
1230
915
715
46
2.4
91
710
60
76
525
3.6
270


79
28
1245
905
690
40
2.3
90
725
49
56
560
7.1
265


80
33
1220
865
680
27
2.0
92
705
56
61
545
0.03
295


81
33
1205
900
700
43
2.0
92
660
38
52
550

31.4

250


82
33
1230
885
690
31
1.8
90
735
31

4

590
8.2
260


83
33
1215
870
685
54
1.8
89
690
42

207

505
4.5
275


84
33
1250
910
720
33
2.5
91
705
37
93

440

2.7
285


85
33
1225
920
665
28
2.3
91
720
18
42

675

4.3
265


86
33
1210
870
705
35
2.3
91
680
84
59
555
6.0
255


87
37
1235
895
645
31
2.5
91
685
73
85
530
2.8
280


88
37
1240
860
680
46
1.9
88
715
40
106
515
3.1

415



89
37
1260
920
665
52
2.1
91
695

132

58
560
5.6
260


90
37
1200
905
710
29
2.1
90
720

6

74
545
0.8
290


91
37
1210
890
650
32
2.0
90

605

55
101
510
2.9
280


92
37
1225
870
660
36
2.0
89

830

29
129
510
5.4
265


93
47
1215
855
705
42
1.7

83

700
46
38
570
1.7
270


94
47
1245
925
690

7

3.2
93
670
78
27
590
2.0
270


95
47
1230
865
680

91

2.6
92
725
32
45
585
3.8
260


96
49
1240
880

485

44
2.4
90
740
51
63
535
4.4
275


97
49
1220

770

695
53
2.4
89
705
64
112
525
7.2
255


98
49

1065

905
705
33
2.3
89
730
56
54
540
6.5
265


















Temper rolling

Propor-
Upper





process

tion of
yield














Final

non-
stress
Evaluation


















Steel
Rolling
sheet

recrystal-
in
Corro-
Dent




sheet
reduc-
thick-

lized
rolling
sion
in



sample
tion
ness
(Ti*/48)/
ferrite
direction
resist-
neck



No.
(%)
(mm)
(C/12)
(%)
(MPa)
ance
portion
Remarks







50
1.5
0.22
0.274
1.5
601
Good
No
Example



51
0.7
0.16
0.274

5.3

572
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



52
1.8
0.18
0.274

4.2

585
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



53
2.2
0.20
0.274
2.7

487

Good
No
Comparative











Example



54
0.5
0.20
0.274
1.6
609
Good
No
Example



55
2.8
0.26
0.274
2.0

513

Good
No
Comparative











Example



56
2.5
0.24
0.163

11.4

564
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



57
2.3
0.19
0.163
1.2
596
Good
No
Example



58
1.6
0.16
0.163
2.1
617
Good
No
Example



59
1.4
0.21
0.163
0.3

466

Good
No
Comparative











Example



60
1.4
0.26
0.163
2.2

502

Good
No
Comparative











Example



61
1.7
0.24
0.163

7.5

575
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



62
1.3
0.24
0.163
1.6

516

Good
No
Comparative











Example



63
1.9
0.16
0.163
2.8

637

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



64
0.6
0.20
0.163
2.3
612
Good
No
Example



65
1.2
0.17
0.010
2.2

639

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



66
1.2
0.17
0.010
1.9

523

Good
No
Comparative











Example



67
1.9
0.23
0.010
2.6
588
Good
No
Example



68
1.9
0.25
0.010
2.0

484

Good
No
Comparative











Example



69
1.9
0.17
0.010
2.4

637

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



70
1.5
0.17
0.227

8.1

557
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



71
1.0
0.17
0.227
2.8

641

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



72
1.4
0.17
0.227

10.5

590
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



73
2.2
0.22
0.227
1.8
582
Good
No
Example



74
1.6
0.25
0.227
2.7

636

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



75
0.05
0.20
0.227
2.6

514

Good
No
Comparative











Example



76

3.9

0.25
0.252
2.3

635

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



77
1.2
0.25
0.252
1.8
598
Good
No
Example



78
0.9
0.21
0.252
2.2
613
Good
No
Example



79
2.3
0.22
0.252
2.5
609
Good
No
Example



80
1.8
0.16
0.222
2.7

502

Good
No
Comparative











Example



81
2.1
0.16
0.222
2.8

496

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



82
1.5
0.18
0.222
2.6

491

Good
No
Comparative











Example



83
1.4
0.20
0.222
2.9

535

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



84
1.2
0.22
0.222
2.8

539

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



85
1.2
0.20
0.222
2.7

494

Good
No
Comparative











Example



86
0.06
0.21
0.222
2.8

509

Good
No
Comparative











Example



87

32.5

0.15
0.185
2.9

691

Poor
Yes
Comparative











Example



88
2.0
0.22
0.185
2.6

637

Poor
Yes
Comparative











Example



89
1.9
0.19
0.185
2.3

532

Poor
No
Comparative











Example



90
2.3
0.21
0.185

6.5

566
Poor
Yes
Comparative











Example



91
1.7
0.20
0.185

13.2

558
Poor
Yes
Comparative











Example



92
1.3
0.22
0.185
0.5

510

Poor
No
Comparative











Example



93
1.6
0.28
0.117

9.5


527

Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



94
1.4
0.22
0.117

10.7

554
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



95
0.7
0.21
0.117

8.3

579
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



96
0.9
0.24
0.235

7.9

576
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



97
1.8
0.26
0.235

8.7

562
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example



98
1.5
0.25
0.235

8.4

580
Good
Yes
Comparative











Example







Note that underline indicates it is outside the scope of the present disclosure.






INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the present disclosure, it is possible to obtain a steel sheet for cans with high strength and sufficiently high forming accuracy particularly as a material for a can body with a neck portion. Further, according to the present disclosure, the uniform deformability of the steel sheet is high, so that it is possible to produce a can body product with high forming accuracy during, for example, the forming of a can body. Furthermore, the steel sheet of the present disclosure is a most suitable steel sheet for cans, mainly for three-piece cans with a large amount of deformation during forming of a can body, two-piece cans where a few percent of a bottom portion is deformed, and can lids.

Claims
  • 1. A steel sheet for cans, comprising a chemical composition containing, in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, B: 0.0005% or more and less than 0.0020%, and Cr: 0.08% or less, wherein, with Ti*=Ti−1.5S, 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 is satisfied, and the balance is Fe and inevitable impurities; and a microstructure with a proportion of non-recrystallized ferrite of 3% or less, wherein an upper yield stress is 550 MPa or more and 620 MPa or less.
  • 2. The steel sheet for cans according to claim 1, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and V: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less.
  • 3. A method of producing a steel sheet for cans, comprising a hot rolling process wherein a steel slab comprising a chemical composition containing, in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, B: 0.0005% or more and less than 0.0020%, and Cr: 0.08% or less, where, with Ti*=Ti−1.5S, 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 is satisfied, and the balance is Fe and inevitable impurities, is heated at 1200° C. or higher and subjected to rolling with a rolling finish temperature of 850° C. or higher to obtain a steel sheet, and the steel sheet is subjected to coiling at a temperature of 640° C. or higher and 780° C. or lower and then cooled at an average cooling rate of 25° C./h or higher and 55° C./h or lower from 500° C. to 300° C.; a cold rolling process wherein the steel sheet after the hot rolling process is subjected to cold rolling at rolling reduction of 86% or more; an annealing process wherein the steel sheet after the cold rolling process is held in a temperature range of 640° C. or higher and 780° C. or lower for 10 seconds or longer and 90 seconds or shorter, then the steel sheet is subjected to primary cooling to a temperature range of 500° C. or higher and 600° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 7° C./s or higher and 180° C./s or lower, and subsequently the steel sheet is subjected to secondary cooling to 300° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 0.1° C./s or higher and 10° C./s or lower; and a process wherein the steel sheet after the annealing process is subjected to temper rolling with rolling reduction of 0.1% or more and 3.0% or less.
  • 4. The method of producing a steel sheet for cans according to claim 3, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and V: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2019-116706 Jun 2019 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2020/022579 6/8/2020 WO