Steel sheet for cans and method of producing same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12129535
  • Patent Number
    12,129,535
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 13, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 29, 2024
    2 months ago
Abstract
Provided is a steel sheet for cans. A steel sheet for cans comprises: a chemical composition containing, in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, and Cr: 0.08% or less, and satisfying a relationship 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 where Ti*=Ti−1.5S, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities; a microstructure in which a proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is 10% or less; and an upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a steel sheet for cans and a method of producing the same.


BACKGROUND

Steel sheets are used in the can bodies or lids of food cans and beverage cans. These cans are desired to be produced at lower costs.


Hence, reduction in the thickness of steel sheets used is promoted to reduce the material costs. Steel sheets subjected to thickness reduction include steel sheets used in the can body of a two-piece can formed by drawing, the can body of a three-piece can formed by cylinder forming, and their can lids. Since simply reducing the thickness of a steel sheet causes a decrease in the strength of the can body or the can lid, it is desirable to use a high-strength and ultra-thin steel sheet for cans in a part such as the can body of a drawn-redrawn (DRD) can or a welded can.


A high-strength and ultra-thin steel sheet for cans is produced using a double reduction method (hereafter also referred to as “DR method”) that involves secondary cold rolling with a rolling reduction of 20% or more after annealing. A steel sheet (hereafter also referred to as “DR material”) produced using the DR method has high strength, but has low total elongation (poor ductility) and poor workability.


DR materials are increasingly used in straight-shaped can bodies. Meanwhile, can lids of food cans which open have complex shapes, and therefore the use of DR materials often results in failure to obtain highly accurate shapes in sites that are complex in shape. Specifically, a can lid is produced by subjecting a steel sheet sequentially to blanking, shell processing, and curling by press working. In particular, given that a flange portion of a can body and a curl portion of a can lid are seamed to ensure the hermeticity of a can, the curl portion of the can lid needs to be shaped with high accuracy in curling. For example, if the curl portion of the can lid is wrinkled, the hermeticity of the can after seaming the flange portion of the can body and the curl portion of the can lid is significantly impaired. A DR material typically used as a high-strength and ultra-thin steel sheet for cans has poor ductility. It is often difficult to use such a DR material in a can lid of a complex shape from the viewpoint of workability. Hence, in the case of using a DR material, die adjustment is performed many times before yielding a product. The DR material is obtained by strengthening the steel sheet through strain hardening by secondary cold rolling. Depending on the accuracy of the secondary cold rolling, the strain hardening is non-uniformly introduced into the steel sheet, as a result of which local deformation occurs when working the DR material. Such local deformation causes wrinkling of the curl portion of the can lid, and thus needs to be prevented.


To avoid the drawbacks of the DR material, high-strength steel sheet production methods using various strengthening techniques are proposed. JP H8-325670 A (PTL 1) proposes a steel sheet that achieves a balance between strength and ductility by combining strengthening by precipitation of Nb carbide and refinement strengthening by Nb, Ti, and B carbonitrides. JP 2004-183074 A (PTL 2) proposes a method of strengthening a steel sheet using solid solution strengthening by Mn, P, N, etc. JP 2001-89828 A (PTL 3) proposes a steel sheet for cans that has a tensile strength of less than 540 MPa using strengthening by precipitation of Nb, Ti, and B carbonitrides and has improved weld formability by controlling the particle size of oxide-based inclusions. JP 5858208 B1 (PTL 4) proposes a steel sheet for high-strength containers that has high strength by solute N by increasing the N content and has a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more and an elongation after fracture of 10% or more by controlling the dislocation density of the steel sheet in the thickness direction.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature





    • PTL 1: JP H8-325670 A

    • PTL 2: JP 2004-183074 A

    • PTL 3: JP 2001-89828 A

    • PTL 4: JP 5858208 B1





SUMMARY
Technical Problem

As mentioned above, the strength needs to be ensured in order to reduce the thickness of a steel sheet for cans. Meanwhile, in the case where the steel sheet is used as a material of a can lid having high working accuracy, the steel sheet needs to have high ductility. Further, to enhance the working accuracy of the curl portion of the can lid, local deformation of the steel sheet needs to be suppressed. Regarding these properties, the foregoing conventional techniques are inferior in any of the strength, the ductility (total elongation), the uniform deformability, and the curl portion working accuracy.


PTL 1 proposes a steel that has high strength by strengthening by precipitation and achieves a balance between strength and ductility. However, local deformation of the steel sheet is not taken into consideration in PTL 1. With the production method described in PTL 1, it is difficult to obtain a steel sheet that satisfies the working accuracy required for the curl portion of the can lid.


PTL 2 proposes achieving high strength by solid solution strengthening. However, strengthening the steel sheet by excessively adding P facilitates local deformation of the steel sheet, and it is difficult to obtain a steel sheet that satisfies the working accuracy required for the curl portion of the can lid.


PTL 3 proposes achieving desired strength by strengthening by precipitation of Nb, Ti, and B carbonitrides. However, from the viewpoint of weld formability and surface characteristics, Ca and REM need to be added, too, and there is a problem of degradation in corrosion resistance. Moreover, local deformation of the steel sheet is not taken into consideration in PTL 3. With the production method described in PTL 3, it is difficult to obtain a steel sheet that satisfies the working accuracy required for the curl portion of the can lid.


PTL 4 proposes forming a can lid using a steel sheet for high-strength containers that has a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more and an elongation after fracture of 10% or more and pressure resistance is evaluated for the can lid. However, the shape of the curl portion of the can lid is not taken into consideration, and it is difficult to obtain a can lid having high working accuracy.


It could therefore be helpful to provide a steel sheet for cans that has high strength and has sufficiently high working accuracy particularly as a material of a curl portion of a can lid, and a method of producing the same.


Solution to Problem

We thus provide:


[1] A steel sheet for cans, comprising: a chemical composition containing (consisting of), in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, and Cr: 0.08% or less, and satisfying a relationship 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 where Ti*=Ti−1.5S, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities; a microstructure in which a proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is 10% or less; and an upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more.


[2] The steel sheet for cans according to [1], wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and B: 0.0020% or more and 0.0100% or less.


[3] A method of producing a steel sheet for cans, the method comprising: performing a hot rolling process of heating a steel slab at 1200° C. or more, the steel slab having a chemical composition containing, in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, and Cr: 0.08% or less, and satisfying a relationship 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 where Ti*=Ti−1.5S, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities; rolling the steel slab at a finish rolling temperature of 850° C. or more to obtain a steel sheet, coiling the steel sheet at a temperature of 640° C. or more and 780° C. or less, and thereafter cooling the steel sheet at an average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. of 25° C./h or more and 55° C./h or less, performing a primary cold rolling process of subjecting the steel sheet after the hot rolling process to cold rolling with a rolling reduction of 86% or more; performing an annealing process of heating the steel sheet after the primary cold rolling process at an average heating rate to 500° C. of 8 ºC/s or more and 50° C./s or less, and thereafter holding the steel sheet in a temperature range of 640° C. or more and 780° C. or less for 10 sec or more and 90 sec or less; and performing a secondary cold rolling process of subjecting the steel sheet after the annealing process to cold rolling with a rolling reduction of 0.1% or more and 15.0% or less.


[4] The method of producing a steel sheet for cans according to [3], wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and B: 0.0020% or more and 0.0100% or less.


Advantageous Effect

It is thus possible to obtain a steel sheet for cans that has high strength and has sufficiently high working accuracy particularly as a material of a curl portion of a can lid.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

One of the disclosed embodiments will be described below. First, the chemical composition of a steel sheet for cans according to one of the disclosed embodiments will be described below. Although the unit in the chemical composition is “mass %”, the unit is simply expressed as “%” unless otherwise noted.


C: 0.010% or More and 0.130% or Less


It is important that the steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment has an upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more. To achieve this, it is important to use strengthening by precipitation of Ti-based carbide formed as a result of Ti being contained. The C content in the steel sheet for cans is crucial in order to use strengthening by precipitation of Ti-based carbide. If the C content is less than 0.010%, the strength increase effect by the strengthening by precipitation decreases, resulting in an upper yield strength of less than 550 MPa. The lower limit of the C content is therefore 0.010%. If the C content is more than 0.130%, hypo-peritectic cracking occurs in a cooling process during steelmaking. In addition, the steel sheet becomes excessively hard, and the ductility decreases. Furthermore, the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains exceeds 10%, and wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The upper limit of the C content is therefore 0.130%. If the C content is 0.060% or less, the deformation resistance in cold rolling is low, and rolling can be performed at a higher rolling rate. Hence, from the viewpoint of ease of production, the C content is preferably 0.015% or more, and the C content is preferably 0.060% or less.


Si: 0.04% or Less


Si is an element that increases the strength of the steel by solid solution strengthening. To achieve this effect, the Si content is preferably 0.01% or more. If the Si content is more than 0.04%, the corrosion resistance decreases significantly. The Si content is therefore 0.04% or less. The Si content is preferably 0.01% or more. The Si content is preferably 0.03% or less.


Mn: 0.10% or More and 1.00% or Less


Mn increases the strength of the steel by solid solution strengthening. If the Mn content is less than 0.10%, an upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more cannot be ensured. The lower limit of the Mn content is therefore 0.10%. If the Mn content is more than 1.00%, the corrosion resistance and the surface characteristics degrade. Moreover, the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains exceeds 10%, so that local deformation occurs and the uniform deformability decreases. The upper limit of the Mn content is therefore 1.00%. The Mn content is preferably 0.20% or more. The Mn content is preferably 0.60% or less.


P: 0.007% or More and 0.100% or Less


P is an element having high solid solution strengthening ability. To achieve this effect, the P content needs to be 0.007% or more. The lower limit of the P content is therefore 0.007%. If the P content is more than 0.100%, the steel sheet becomes excessively hard, so that the ductility decreases. Further, the corrosion resistance decreases. The upper limit of the P content is therefore 0.100%. The P content is preferably 0.008% or more. The P content is preferably 0.015% or less.


S: 0.0005% or More and 0.0090% or Less


The steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment has high strength as a result of strengthening by precipitation of Ti-based carbide. S tends to form TiS with Ti. In the case where TiS forms, the amount of Ti-based carbide useful for strengthening by precipitation decreases, and high strength cannot be achieved. In detail, if the S content is more than 0.0090%, a large amount of TiS forms, and the strength decreases. The upper limit of the S content is therefore 0.0090%. The S content is preferably 0.0080% or less. If the S content is less than 0.0005%, the desulfurization costs are excessively high. The lower limit of the S content is therefore 0.0005%.


Al: 0.001% or More and 0.100% or Less


Al is an element contained as a deoxidizer. Al is also useful for refining the steel. If the Al content is less than 0.001%, its effect as a deoxidizer is insufficient, and solidification defects occur and the steelmaking costs increase. The lower limit of the Al content is therefore 0.001%. If the Al content is more than 0.100%, surface defects may occur. The upper limit of the Al content is therefore 0.100% or less. To enable Al to sufficiently function as a deoxidizer, the Al content is preferably 0.010% or more, and the Al content is preferably 0.060% or less.


N: 0.0050% or Less


The steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment has high strength as a result of strengthening by precipitation of Ti-based carbide. N tends to form TiN with Ti. In the case where TiN forms, the amount of Ti-based carbide useful for strengthening by precipitation decreases, and high strength cannot be achieved. Moreover, if the N content is excessively high, slab cracking tends to occur in a lower straightening zone in which the temperature during continuous casting decreases. Further, the amount of Ti-based carbide useful for strengthening by precipitation decreases due to TiN formed in a large amount as mentioned above, and the desired strength cannot be achieved. The upper limit of the N content is therefore 0.0050%. Although no lower limit is placed on the N content, the N content is preferably more than 0.0005% from the viewpoint of steelmaking costs.


Ti: 0.0050% or More and 0.1000% or Less


Ti is an element having high carbide formability, and is effective in causing fine carbide to precipitate. This increases the upper yield strength. In this embodiment, the upper yield strength can be adjusted by adjusting the Ti content. This effect is achieved if the Ti content is 0.0050% or more. The lower limit of the Ti content is therefore 0.0050%. Meanwhile, Ti causes an increase in recrystallization temperature. If the Ti content is more than 0.1000%, a large amount of non-recrystallized microstructure remains in annealing at a soaking temperature of 640° C. to 780° C. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The upper limit of the Ti content is therefore 0.1000%. The Ti content is preferably 0.0100% or more. The Ti content is preferably 0.0800% or less.


Cr: 0.08% or Less


Cr is an element that forms carbonitride. Cr carbonitride contributes to higher strength of the steel, although its strengthening ability is lower than that of Ti-based carbide. To sufficiently achieve this effect, the Cr content is preferably 0.001% or more. If the Cr content is more than 0.08%, Cr carbonitride forms excessively, and the formation of Ti-based carbide that contributes most to the steel strengthening ability is reduced, making it impossible to achieve the desired strength. The Cr content is therefore 0.08% or less.

0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700


To achieve high strength and also suppress local deformation during working, the value of (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is important. Here, Ti* is defined as Ti*=Ti−1.5S. Ti forms a fine precipitate (Ti-based carbide) with C, and contributes to higher strength of the steel. C which does not form Ti-based carbide will end up being present in the steel as cementite or solute C. If the fraction of such cementite in the ferrite grains of the steel is not less than a predetermined fraction, local deformation occurs when working the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. Moreover, Ti tends to combine with S and form TiS. In the case where TiS forms, the amount of Ti-based carbide useful for strengthening by precipitation decreases, and high strength cannot be achieved. We discovered that, by controlling the value of (Ti*/48)/(C/12), wrinkling caused by local deformation when working the steel sheet can be suppressed while achieving strengthening by Ti-based carbide. In detail, if (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is less than 0.005, the amount of Ti-based carbide contributing to higher strength of the steel decreases, resulting in an upper yield strength of less than 550 MPa. Moreover, the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains exceeds 10%, and wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is therefore 0.005 or more. If (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is more than 0.700, a large amount of non-recrystallized microstructure remains in annealing at a soaking temperature of 640° C. to 780° C. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is therefore 0.700 or less. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is preferably 0.090 or more. (Ti*/48)/(C/12) is preferably 0.400 or less.


The basic components according to this embodiment have been described above. While the balance other than the components described above consists of Fe and inevitable impurities, the chemical composition may optionally further contain the following elements as appropriate.


Nb: 0.0050% or More and 0.0500% or Less


Nb is an element having high carbide formability, and is effective in causing fine carbide to precipitate, as with Ti. This increases the upper yield strength. In this embodiment, the upper yield strength can be adjusted by adjusting the Nb content. This effect is achieved if the Nb content is 0.0050% or more. The lower limit of the Nb content is therefore 0.0050%. Meanwhile, Nb causes an increase in recrystallization temperature. If the Nb content is more than 0.0500%, a large amount of non-recrystallized microstructure remains in annealing at a soaking temperature of 640° C. to 780° C. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The upper limit of the Nb content is therefore 0.0500%. The Nb content is preferably 0.0080% or more. The Nb content is preferably 0.0300% or less.


Mo: 0.0050% or More and 0.0500% or Less


Mo is an element having high carbide formability, and is effective in causing fine carbide to precipitate, as with Ti and Nb. This increases the upper yield strength. In this embodiment, the upper yield strength can be adjusted by adjusting the Mo content. This effect is achieved if the Mo content is 0.0050% or more. The lower limit of the Mo content is therefore 0.0050%. Meanwhile, Mo causes an increase in recrystallization temperature. If the Mo content is more than 0.0500%, a large amount of non-recrystallized microstructure remains in annealing at a soaking temperature of 640° C. to 780° C. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The upper limit of the Mo content is therefore 0.0500%. The Mo content is preferably 0.0080% or more. The Mo content is preferably 0.0300% or less.


B: 0.0020% or More and 0.0100% or Less


B is effective in refining ferrite grains and increasing the upper yield strength. In this embodiment, the upper yield strength can be adjusted by adjusting the B content. This effect is achieved if the B content is 0.0020% or more. The lower limit of the B content is therefore 0.0020%. Meanwhile, B causes an increase in recrystallization temperature. If the B content is more than 0.0100%, a large amount of non-recrystallized microstructure remains in annealing at a soaking temperature of 640° C. to 780° C. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The upper limit of the B content is therefore 0.0100%. The B content is preferably 0.0025% or more. The B content is preferably 0.0050% or less.


The mechanical properties of the steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment will be described below. To ensure the denting strength of a welded can, the pressure resistance of a can lid, and the like, the upper yield strength of the steel sheet is limited to 550 MPa or more. If the composition is such that the upper yield strength is 670 MPa or less, higher corrosion resistance is achieved. The upper yield strength is therefore preferably 670 MPa or less.


The yield strength can be measured by the metallic material tensile testing method defined in JIS Z 2241: 2011. The foregoing yield strength can be achieved by adjusting the chemical composition, the cooling rate after coiling in a hot rolling process, and the heating rate in an annealing process. Specifically, a yield strength of 550 MPa or more can be achieved by limiting the chemical composition as described above, limiting the coiling temperature in the hot rolling process to 640° C. or more and 780° C. or less, limiting the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling to 25° C./h or more and 55° C./h or less, limiting the average heating rate to 500° C. in the continuous annealing process to 8° C./s or more and 50° C./s or less, limiting the soaking temperature to 640° C. or more and 780° C. or less, limiting the holding time during which the soaking temperature is 640° C. to 780° C. to 10 sec or more and 90 sec or less, and limiting the rolling reduction in a secondary cold rolling process to 0.1% or more.


The metallic microstructure of the steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment will be described below.


Proportion of Cementite in Ferrite Grains: 10% or Less


If the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is more than 10%, wrinkling is caused by local deformation during working, e.g. when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is therefore 10% or less. Although the mechanism for this is not clear, it is presumed that, if cementite larger than fine Ti-based carbide is present in a large amount, the balance of interaction between dislocations and fine Ti-based carbide and cementite during working is lost, leading to wrinkling. The proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is preferably 8% or less. The proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is preferably 1% or more, and more preferably 2% or more.


The proportion of cementite in ferrite grains can be measured by the following method: After polishing a section in the thickness direction parallel to the rolling direction of the steel sheet, the section is etched with an etching solution (3 vol % nital). After this, a region from a position of ¼ of the thickness (i.e. a position of ¼ of the thickness from the surface in the thickness direction in the section) to a position of ½ of the thickness is observed using an optical microscope for 10 observation fields with 400 magnification. Using each micrograph taken by the optical microscope, cementite in ferrite grains is identified through visual determination, and the area ratio of cementite is calculated through image analysis. Here, cementite is circular and elliptic metallic microstructures in black or gray color in the optical microscope with 400 magnification. The area ratio of cementite is calculated for each observation field, and an average value of the area ratios for the 10 observation fields is taken to be the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains.


Thickness: 0.4 mm or Less


Currently, thinner steel sheets are promoted for the purpose of reducing can production costs. However, making a steel sheet thinner, i.e. reducing the thickness of the steel sheet, may cause a decrease in can strength and a forming failure during working. With the steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment, a decrease in can strength, e.g. a decrease in the pressure resistance of the can lid, and a forming failure involving wrinkling during working are prevented even in the case where the steel sheet is thin. That is, in the case where the steel sheet is thin, high strength and high working accuracy which are effects according to the present disclosure can be exhibited remarkably. Accordingly, the thickness is preferably 0.4 mm or less. The thickness may be 0.3 mm or less, and may be 0.2 mm or less.


A method of producing a steel sheet for cans according to one of the disclosed embodiments will be described below. In the following description, each temperature is based on the surface temperature of the steel sheet, and the average cooling rate is a value calculated based on the surface temperature of the steel sheet as follows: For example, the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. is expressed as “{(500° C.)−(300° C.)}/(cooling time from 500° C. to 300° C.)”.


When producing the steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment, molten steel is adjusted to the foregoing chemical composition by a publicly known method using a converter or the like and then subjected to, for example, continuous casting to obtain a slab.


Slab Heating Temperature: 1200° C. or More


If the slab heating temperature in the hot rolling process is less than 1200° C., coarse nitride formed during the casting, such as AlN, remains in the steel as undissolved. This causes a decrease in can productivity. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The lower limit of the slab heating temperature is therefore 1200° C. The slab heating temperature is preferably 1220° C. or more. If the slab heating temperature is more than 1350° C., the effect is saturated. Accordingly, the upper limit of the slab heating temperature is preferably 1350° C.


Finish Rolling Temperature: 850° C. or More


If the finish temperature in the hot rolling process is less than 850° C., non-recrystallized microstructure resulting from non-recrystallized microstructure in the hot-rolled steel sheet remains in the steel sheet after the annealing, and wrinkling is caused by local deformation when working the steel sheet. The lower limit of the finish rolling temperature is therefore 850° C. If the finish rolling temperature is 950° C. or less, a steel sheet having better surface characteristics can be produced. Accordingly, the finish rolling temperature is preferably 950° C. or less.


Coiling Temperature: 640° C. or More and 780° C. or Less


If the coiling temperature in the hot rolling process is less than 640° C., a large amount of cementite precipitates in the hot-rolled steel sheet. Consequently, the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains after the annealing exceeds 10%, and wrinkling is caused by local deformation when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The lower limit of the coiling temperature is therefore 640° C. If the coiling temperature is more than 780° C., part of ferrite in the steel sheet after the continuous annealing coarsens and the steel sheet softens, resulting in an upper yield strength of less than 550 MPa. The upper limit of the coiling temperature is therefore 780° C. The coiling temperature is preferably 660° C. or more. The coiling temperature is preferably 760° C. or less.


Average Cooling Rate from 500° C. to 300° C.: 25° C./h or More and 55° C./h or Less


If the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling is less than 25° C./h, a large amount of cementite precipitates in the hot-rolled steel sheet, and the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains after the annealing exceeds 10%. Consequently, wrinkling is caused by local deformation when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid, or the amount of fine Ti-based carbide contributing to higher strength decreases and the strength of the steel sheet decreases. The lower limit of the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling is therefore 25° C./h. If the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling is more than 55° C./h, solute C present in the steel increases, and wrinkling is caused by solute C when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The upper limit of the average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling is therefore 55° C./h or less. The average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling is preferably 30° C./h or more. The average cooling rate from 500° C. to 300° C. after the coiling is preferably 50° C./h or less. The average cooling rate can be achieved by air cooling. Herein, the “average cooling rate” is based on the average temperature of the edges and the center in the coil transverse direction.


Pickling


After this, pickling is preferably performed according to need. The conditions of the pickling are not limited as long as surface layer scale can be removed. Scale may be removed by a method other than pickling.


Next, cold rolling is performed twice, with annealing being provided therebetween.


Rolling Reduction in Primary Cold Rolling: 86% or More


If the rolling reduction in the primary cold rolling process is less than 86%, strain applied to the steel sheet in the cold rolling decreases, making it difficult to achieve an upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more in the steel sheet after the continuous annealing. The rolling reduction in the primary cold rolling process is therefore 86% or more. The rolling reduction in the primary cold rolling process is preferably 87% or more. The rolling reduction in the primary cold rolling process is preferably 94% or less. One or more other processes, such as an annealing process for softening the hot-rolled sheet, may be performed as appropriate after the hot rolling process and before the primary cold rolling process. The primary cold rolling process may be performed immediately after the hot rolling process, without pickling.


Average Heating Rate to 500° C.: 8° C./s or More and 50° C./s or Less


The steel sheet after the primary cold rolling process is heated to the below-described soaking temperature under the condition that the average heating rate to 500° C. is 8° C./s or more and 50° C./s or less. If the average heating rate to 500° C. is less than 8° C./s, Ti-based carbide that precipitates mainly in the coiling process in the hot rolling coarsens during heating, and the strength decreases. The average heating rate to 500° C. is therefore 8° C./s or more. If the average heating rate to 500° C. is more than 50° C./s, a large amount of non-recrystallized microstructure remains in the annealing at a soaking temperature of 640° C. to 780° C. In such a case, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The average heating rate to 500° C. is therefore 50° C./s or less. It is not preferable that the steel sheet temperature, after reaching 500° C., decreases before reaching the soaking temperature. The steel sheet is preferably heated to 640° C. while maintaining the average heating rate to 500° C.


Soaking Temperature: 640° C. or More and 780° C. or Less


If the soaking temperature in the continuous annealing process is more than 780° C., sheet passage troubles such as heat buckling are likely to occur in the continuous annealing. Moreover, part of ferrite grains in the steel sheet coarsens and the steel sheet softens, resulting in an upper yield strength of less than 550 MPa. The soaking temperature is therefore 780° C. or less. If the annealing temperature is less than 640° C., the recrystallization of ferrite grains is imperfect, and non-recrystallized microstructure remains. In the case where non-recrystallized microstructure remains, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet, as a result of which local deformation occurs. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid. The soaking temperature is therefore 640° C. or more. The soaking temperature is preferably 660° C. or more. The soaking temperature is preferably 740° C. or less.


Holding Time During which Soaking Temperature is in Temperature Range of 640° C. to 780° C.: 10 Sec or More and 90 Sec or Less


If the holding time is more than 90 sec, Ti-based carbide that precipitates mainly in the coiling process in the hot rolling coarsens, and the strength decreases. If the holding time is less than 10 sec, the recrystallization of ferrite grains is imperfect, and non-recrystallized microstructure remains. Consequently, when the steel sheet deforms, strain is non-uniformly applied to the steel sheet, as a result of which local deformation occurs. Thus, wrinkling occurs when the steel sheet is worked into a curl portion of a can lid.


A continuous annealing device may be used in the annealing. One or more other processes, such as an annealing process for softening the hot-rolled sheet, may be performed as appropriate after the primary cold rolling process and before the annealing process. The annealing process may be performed immediately after the primary cold rolling process.


Rolling Reduction in Secondary Cold Rolling: 0.1% or More and 15.0% or Less


If the rolling reduction in the secondary cold rolling after the annealing is more than 15.0%, excessive strain hardening is introduced into the steel sheet, as a result of which the strength of the steel sheet increases excessively. Consequently, for example, cracking occurs in the shell processing for a can lid or wrinkling occurs in the subsequent working for a curl portion when working the steel sheet. The rolling reduction in the secondary cold rolling is therefore 15.0% or less. To enhance the accuracy of working the steel sheet, the secondary cold rolling ratio is desirably low. Hence, the rolling reduction in the secondary cold rolling is preferably less than 7.0%. The secondary cold rolling has a function of imparting surface roughness to the steel sheet. To impart uniform surface roughness to the steel sheet and achieve an upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more, the rolling reduction in the secondary cold rolling needs to be 0.1% or more. The secondary cold rolling process may be performed in an annealing device, or performed as an independent rolling process.


The steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment can be obtained in the above-described way. In this embodiment, various processes may be further performed after the secondary cold rolling. For example, a coating layer may be formed on the surface of the steel sheet for cans according to this embodiment. Examples of the coating layer include a Sn coating layer, a Cr coating layer as in tin-free steel, a Ni coating layer, and a Sn—Ni coating layer. Processes such as paint baking treatment and film lamination may also be performed. Since the film thickness of the coating, the laminate film, or the like is sufficiently small relative to the sheet thickness, its influence on the mechanical properties of the steel sheet for cans is negligible.


EXAMPLES

Each steel having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities was obtained by steelmaking in a converter, and continuously cast to obtain a steel slab. The steel slab was then subjected to hot rolling under the hot rolling conditions shown in Table 2 and 3, and pickled after the hot rolling. The steel slab was then subjected to primary cold rolling with the rolling reduction shown in Table 2 and 3, subjected to continuous annealing under the continuous annealing conditions shown in Table 2 and 3, and then subjected to secondary cold rolling with the rolling reduction shown in Table 2 and 3, thus obtaining a steel sheet. The steel sheet was subjected to typical Sn coating continuously, to obtain a Sn coated steel sheet (tinned sheet-iron) with a coating weight per side of 11.2 g/m2. After this, the Sn coated steel sheet was subjected to heat treatment equivalent to paint baking treatment at 210° C. for 10 min, and then evaluated as follows.


<Tensile Test>


A tensile test was conducted in accordance with the metallic material tensile testing method defined in JIS Z 2241: 2011. In detail, a JIS No. 5 tensile test piece (JIS Z 2201) with the direction orthogonal to the rolling direction being the tensile direction was collected, and a parallel portion of the tensile test piece was provided with gauge marks of 50 mm (L). A tensile test conforming to JIS Z 2241 was then conducted at a tensile rate of 10 mm/min until the tensile test piece fractured, and the upper yield strength was measured. The measurement results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.


<Examination of Metallic Microstructure>


After polishing a section in the thickness direction parallel to the rolling direction of the Sn coated steel sheet, the section was etched with an etching solution (3 vol % nital). After this, a region from a position of ¼ of the thickness (i.e. a position of ¼ of the thickness from the surface in the thickness direction in the section) to a position of ½ of the thickness was observed using an optical microscope for 10 observation fields with 400 magnification. Using each micrograph taken by the optical microscope, cementite in ferrite grains was identified through visual determination, and the area ratio of cementite was calculated through image analysis. Here, cementite is circular and elliptic metallic microstructures in black or gray color in the optical microscope with 400 magnification. The area ratio of cementite was calculated for each observation field, and an average value of the area ratios for the 10 observation fields was taken to be the proportion of cementite in ferrite grains. For the image analysis, image analysis software (“Particle Analysis” available from Nippon Steel Technology Co., Ltd.) was used. The examination results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.


<Corrosion Resistance>


A region of a measurement area of 2.7 mm2 in the Sn coated steel sheet was observed using an optical microscope with 50 magnification, and the number of hole-shaped sites as a result of the Sn coating thinning was counted. The corrosion resistance was evaluated as excellent in the case where the number of hole-shaped sites was less than 20, evaluated as good in the case where the number of hole-shaped sites was 20 or more and 25 or less, and evaluated as poor in the case where the number of hole-shaped sites was more than 25. The observation results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.


<Wrinkling>


A square blank of 120 mm was collected from the steel sheet, and sequentially subjected to circular blanking, shell processing, and curling to produce a can lid. The curl portion of the produced can lid was observed at eight locations in the circumferential direction using a stereoscopic microscope (available from Keyence Corporation), and whether wrinkling occurred was studied. The evaluation results are shown in Tables 2 and 3. In the case where wrinkling occurred in at least one of the eight locations in the circumferential direction, the steel sheet was determined as “wrinkled”. In the case where wrinkling did not occur in any of the eight locations in the circumferential direction, the steel sheet was determined as “not wrinkled”.






















TABLE 1





Steel












(mass %)


No.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
Ti
Cr
Nb
Mo
B
Remarks




























1
0.038
0.01
0.47
0.008
0.0051
0.048
0.0045
0.072
0.024
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


2
0.124
0.01
0.43
0.010
0.0064
0.052
0.0049
0.065
0.038
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


3
0.015
0.02
0.50
0.009
0.0047
0.044
0.0042
0.046
0.015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


4
0.044
0.02
0.46
0.011
0.0053
0.039
0.0044
0.050
0.036
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


5
0.036
0.03
0.29
0.010
0.0045
0.046
0.0046
0.052
0.023
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


6
0.047
0.02
0.94
0.009
0.0066
0.038
0.0037
0.018
0.052
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


7
0.039
0.02
0.12
0.009
0.0044
0.051
0.0041
0.037
0.029
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


8
0.042
0.01
0.58
0.010
0.0060
0.047
0.0038
0.043
0.035
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


9
0.053
0.01
0.21
0.011
0.0052
0.043
0.0046
0.024
0.047
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


10
0.040
0.01
0.45
0.009
0.0031
0.055
0.0036
0.069
0.032
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


11
0.046
0.02
0.37
0.010
0.0069
0.039
0.0043
0.054
0.004
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


12
0.044
0.02
0.50
0.009
0.0088
0.052
0.0035
0.068
0.026
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


13
0.058
0.01
0.44
0.010
0.0053
0.027
0.0039
0.053
0.078
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


14
0.012
0.01
0.53
0.011
0.0062
0.046
0.0043
0.017
0.037
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


15
0.054
0.02
0.32
0.010
0.0055
0.058
0.0037
0.019
0.013
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


16
0.068
0.01
0.46
0.011
0.0079
0.054
0.0035
0.014
0.019
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


17
0.039
0.01
0.35
0.012
0.0011
0.042
0.0039
0.015
0.015
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


18
0.020
0.01
0.24
0.012
0.0039
0.056
0.0049
0.020
0.027
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


19
0.042
0.02
0.47
0.011
0.0054
0.043
0.0012
0.044
0.030
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


20
0.029
0.01
0.39
0.010
0.0067
0.051
0.0048
0.038
0.016
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


21
0.042
0.01
0.52
0.011
0.0045
0.049
0.0021
0.026
0.032
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


22
0.036
0.02
0.41
0.012
0.0056
0.053
0.0037
0.086
0.029
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


23
0.028
0.02
0.53
0.014
0.0037
0.055
0.0040
0.009
0.018
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


24
0.051
0.01
0.45
0.011
0.0063
0.042
0.0043
0.078
0.024
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


25
0.032
0.02
0.51
0.013
0.0034
0.056
0.0034
0.011
0.027
tr.
tr.
tr.
Example


26
0.043
0.01
0.37
0.009
0.0052
0.049
0.0045
0.037
0.041
0.034
tr.
tr.
Example


27
0.038
0.01
0.42
0.011
0.0067
0.053
0.0038
0.045
0.039
0.025
tr.
0.0026
Example


28
0.035
0.02
0.39
0.010
0.0049
0.038
0.0042
0.035
0.042
tr.
0.038
tr.
Example


29
0.041
0.01
0.43
0.008
0.0056
0.047
0.0046
0.038
0.027
tr.
0.042
0.0022
Example


30
0.052
0.01
0.41
0.011
0.0063
0.055
0.0069
0.041
0.038
0.038
0.021
tr.
Example


31

0.182

0.02
0.42
0.009
0.0060
0.037
0.0039
0.055
0.019
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


32

0.149

0.01
0.36
0.010
0.0049
0.051
0.0044
0.047
0.035
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


33
0.046
0.01
0.48
0.011

0.0198

0.049
0.0042
0.073
0.040
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


34
0.044
0.02
0.45
0.012
0.0057
0.029
0.0038
0.064

0.116

tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


35

0.006

0.01
0.51
0.014
0.0056
0.042
0.0039
0.013
0.052
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


36

0.009

0.03
0.39
0.011
0.0052
0.047
0.0042
0.015
0.037
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


37
0.039

0.08

0.43
0.012
0.0064
0.053
0.0044
0.026
0.045
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


38
0.047
0.01

1.54

0.001
0.0048
0.045
0.0040
0.032
0.019
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


39
0.061
0.02

0.03

0.013
0.0055
0.049
0.0038
0.074
0.036
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


40
0.058
0.02
0.47

0.132

0.0054
0.036
0.0039
0.038
0.027
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


41
0.036
0.01
0.32
0.011
0.0071
0.061

0.0227

0.046
0.031
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


42
0.054
0.01
0.46
0.010
0.0039
0.054

0.0195

0.061
0.035
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


43
0.065
0.01
0.54
0.009
0.0075
0.046
0.0043

0.174

0.029
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


44
0.072
0.02
0.29
0.013
0.0056
0.027
0.0039

0.157

0.038
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example


45
0.033
0.02
0.53
0.014
0.0018
0.035
0.0041

0.004

0.054
tr.
tr.
tr.
Comparative















Example





NOTE:


Underlines indicate outside range according to present disclosure.























TABLE 2














Rolling












reduction










Cooling

in








Finish

rate
Hot-rolled
primary


Soaking


Steel

Heating
rolling
Coiling
after
sheet
cold
Heating
Soaking
holding


sheet
Steel
temperature
temperature
temperature
coiling
thickness
rolling
rate
temperature
time


No.
No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C./h)
(mm)
(%)
(° C./s)
(° C.)
(s)





1
1
1210
885
690
36
2.3
91
23
710
36


2
2
1205
890
645
29
2.0
91
9
685
84


3
3
1230
880
705
41
2.6
92
36
690
41


4
4
1215
875
660
37
2.3
90
12
675
73


5
5
1210
890
725
53
2.0
90
18
705
56


6
6
1235
855
650
26
1.8
88
47
650
62


7
7
1220
910
710
38
1.8
87
11
745
25


8
8
1240
860
665
42
1.8
90
39
695
47


9
9
1250
905
740
35
1.7
86
20
715
32


10
10
1215
890
685
50
1.7
88
26
700
29


11
11
1220
885
700
44
1.7
88
24
680
43


12
12
1235
870
670
39
1.9
90
41
715
54


13
13
1205
890
655
52
1.9
90
28
670
68


14
14
1200
885
660
28
2.8
93
19
710
17


15
15
1225
900
705
34
1.7
87
25
705
39


16
16
1210
885
750
47
2.0
89
32
690
24


17
17
1205
870
665
31
1.8
89
27
705
53


18
18
1270
905
650
29
3.0
92
39
725
85


19
19
1245
880
750
46
2.3
91
14
655
19


20
20
1285
880
675
40
2.1
91
28
680
46


21
21
1225
890
730
33
1.8
88
22
705
25


22
22
1240
885
650
43
1.8
90
46
730
41


23
23
1215
905
705
37
1.8
90
17
670
37


24
24
1230
935
680
52
2.0
89
33
705
50


25
25
1220
895
695
44
2.3
91
26
690
28


26
26
1235
890
675
35
2.1
90
19
720
35


27
27
1230
895
690
39
2.0
90
24
715
43


28
28
1240
895
665
37
2.1
91
18
695
29


29
29
1225
900
670
42
2.0
90
29
705
37


30
30
1235
905
685
34
2.0
90
31
720
42


31
31
1215
880
675
39
2.3
91
21
700
24


32
32
1205
860
690
40
2.0
89
48
680
57


33
33
1200
885
715
31
1.8
89
25
715
30


34
34
1215
870
665
46
1.8
87
37
705
26


35
35
1240
385
750
35
1.7
86
12
730
63


36
36
1235
910
720
29
2.3
90
46
655
42


37
37
1250
880
705
31
2.6
92
31
690
37


38
38
1225
880
685
37
2.8
93
37
710
84


39
39
1205
905
705
50
2.5
91
24
715
21


40
40
1230
890
690
33
2.3
89
29
690
57


41
41
1210
900
675
29
2.0
89
46
705
65


42
42
1245
875
700
48
2.0
90
18
715
59


43
43
1220
905
660
32
1.8
88
35
685
73


44
44
1255
895
695
49
1.8
90
37
700
36


45
45
1290
905
710
34
1.9
88
23
715
24























Rolling



Upper








reduction


Proportion
yield








in


of
strength








secondary
Finish

cementite
in







Steel
cold
sheet

in ferrite
rolling

Wrinkling





sheet
rolling
thickness

grains
direction
Corrosion
of curl





No.
(%)
(mm)
Ti*/C
(%)
(MPa)
resistance
portion
Remarks







1
2.3
0.20
0.423
3
623
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




2
1.5
0.18
0.112
8
664
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




3
6.7
0.19
0.649
1
591
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




4
3.1
0.22
0.239
5
645
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




5
5.6
0.19
0.314
4
584
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




6
0.8
0.21
0.043
8
651
Good
Not wrinkled
Example




7
6.4
0.22
0.195
2
567
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




8
1.9
0.18
0.202
4
593
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




9
4.7
0.23
0.076
3
576
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




10
5.3
0.19
0.402
5
564
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




11
6.2
0.19
0.237
4
579
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




12
8.5
0.17
0.311
6
602
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




13
7.8
0.18
0.194
6
615
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




14
14.6
0.17
0.160
1
553
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




15
6.1
0.21
0.050
3
576
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




16
5.9
0.21
0.008
8
571
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




17
9.4
0.18
0.083
4
568
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




18
11.7
0.21
0.177
6
556
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




19
9.5
0.19
0.214
3
574
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




20
3.8
0.18
0.241
5
562
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




21
8.2
0.20
0.115
4
576
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




22
1.4
0.18
0.539
6
595
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




23
4.6
0.17
0.031
8
573
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




24
5.3
0.21
0.336
4
649
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




25
7.8
0.19
0.046
7
606
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




26
3.0
0.20
0.170
5
614
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




27
5.1
0.19
0.230
3
522
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




28
4.8
0.18
0.198
8
518
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




29
2.9
0.19
0.180
6
604
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




30
3.4
0.19
0.152
7
595
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




31
0.2
0.21

0.004


13


537

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




32
1.9
0.22
0.067

12


513

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




33
5.7
0.19
0.235
9

507

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




34
4.4
0.22
0.315
8

514

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




35
13.6
0.21

1.192

2

431

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




36
9.0
0.21
0.200
3

458

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




37
6.8
0.19
0.105
5
571
Poor
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




38
0.5
0.20
0.132

16

562
Poor
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




39
6.2
0.21
0.269
6

475

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




40
2.9
0.25
0.129
8

693

Poor
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




41
8.7
0.20
0.245
7

538

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




42
9.5
0.18
0.255
8

516

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




43
7.1
0.20

0.798

6
614
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




44
5.3
0.17
0.516
0
591
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




45
1.9
0.22

0.002


12


457

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example





NOTE:


Underlines indicate outside range according to present disclosure.























TABLE 3














Rolling












reduction










Cooling

in








Finish

rate
Hot-rolled
primary


Soaking


Steel

Heating
rolling
Coiling
after
sheet
cold
Heating
Soaking
holding


sheet
Steel
temperature
temperature
temperature
coiling
thickness
rolling
rate
temperature
time


No.
No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(° C./h)
(mm)
(%)
(° C./s)
(° C.)
(s)





46
3
1090
890
705
43
2.1
90
19
690
43


47
3
1225
905
680
35
2.1
90
24
705
31


48
3
1210
780
695
19
2.0
90
33
675
22


49
3
1230
880
610
32
2.0
91
25
680
35


50
3
1230
900
690
47
2.3
91
16
720
47


51
12
1215
910
710
29
1.9
90
31
710
20


52
12
1205
885
840
36
2.0
90
27
685
34


53
12
1200
905
670
44
2.0
88
32
650
19


54
12
1235
865
715
12
1.8
88
9
670
84


55
12
1250
915
700
37
2.3
91
39
680
17


56
12
1220
895
690
28
1.7
84
45
690
12


57
13
1255
900
675
34
2.3
92
18
685
76


58
13
1245
875
740
41
2.5
92
32
730
38


59
13
1270
860
660
85
2.0
90
40
700
18


60
13
1230
870
705
50
2.0
90
29
690
33


61
13
1220
880
685
38
1.8
87
2
725
79


62
13
1225
925
690
26
2.0
90
14
670
65


63
13
1255
890
705
45
1.8
86
28
695
46


64
18
1240
860
770
30
2.5
93
73
760
14


65
18
1205
895
725
53
2.0
90
20
615
51


66
18
1275
910
675
37
2.1
91
36
690
3


67
24
1210
915
680
29
2.3
92
18
830
46


68
24
1245
875
690
42
2.0
89
23
705
39


69
24
1215
880
705
36
2.2
90
37
685
126


70
24
1235
880
700
39
2.0
90
31
670
28


71
24
1220
890
690
40
2.0
90
28
675
34


72
34
1235
915
645
38
2.3
91
33
710
30


73
34
1220
895
685
43
2.6
93
17
690
73


74
34
1255
905
705
52
3.4
93
50
685
13


75
34
1230
870
725
31
2.5
92
35
705
47


76
34
1270
890
670
13
2.5
92
39
745
40


77
43
1240
875
690
40
1.8
88
1 1
715
68


78
43
1225
910
660
39
1.8
89
27
670
37


79
45
1245
870
715
32
2.0
89
72
685
19


80
45
1205
855
680
84
2.0
90
36
700
41








Rolling



Upper








reduction


Proportion
yield








in


of
strength








secondary
Finish

cementite
in







Steel
cold
sheet

in ferrite
rolling

Wrinkling





sheet
rolling
thickness

grains
direction
Corrosion
of curl





No.
(%)
(mm)
Ti*/C.
(%)
(MPa)
resistance
portion
Remarks







46
4.2
0.20
0.649
8
563
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




47
3.6
0.20
0.649
2
603
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




48
1.9
0.20
0.649
6
574
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




49
5.3
0.17
0.649

13

565
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




50
4.8
0.20
0.649
3
597
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




51
2.2
0.19
0.311
5
606
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




52
5.1
0.19
0.311
9

485

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




53
4.8
0.23
0.311
6
589
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




54
1.5
0.21
0.311

15


512

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




55
6.4
0.19
0.311
6
574
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




56
13.1
0.24
0.311
5

517

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




57
5.3
0.17
0.194
4
595
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




58
10.6
0.18
0.194
5
603
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




59
7.9
0.18
0.194
1
634
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




60
4.6
0.19
0.194
6
612
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




61
8.7
0.21
0.194
00

508

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




62
6.6
0.19
0.194
5
616
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




63
7.0
0.23
0.194
4
604
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




64
0.3
0.17
0.177
6
613
Excellen
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




65
4.8
0.19
0.177
8
568
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




66
9.5
0.17
0.177
5
562
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




67
0.9
0.18
0.336
5

504

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




68
2.4
0.21
0.336
4
637
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




69
3.7
0.21
0.336
7

521

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




70
5.2
0.19
0.336
5
625
Excellent
Not wrinkled
Example




71
0.04
0.20
0.336
5

524

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




72
4.8
0.20
0.336
7

536

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




73
2.3
0.18
0.315
8

542

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




74
23.7
0.18
0.315
8

687

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




75
8.6
0.18
0.315
7

535

Excellent
Not wrinkled
Comparative Example




76
5.9
0.19
0.315

14


541

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




77
9.2
0.20

0.798

9

534

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




78
1.7
0.19

0.798

7
592
Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




79
7.4
0.20

0.002


13


483

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example




80
4.9
0.19

0.002


12


519

Excellent
Wrinkled
Comparative Example





NOTE:


Underlines indicate outside range according to present disclosure.






INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

It is thus possible to obtain a steel sheet for cans that has high strength and has sufficiently high working accuracy particularly as a material of a curl portion of a can lid. Since the steel sheet for cans has high uniform deformability, for example in the case of working a can lid, a can lid product with high working accuracy can be produced. Such a steel sheet for cans is optimal mainly for use in, for example, a three-piece can produced using can body working with a large amount of deformation, a two-piece can produced by working a bottom portion in several %, and a can lid.

Claims
  • 1. A steel sheet for cans, comprising: a chemical composition containing, in mass %, C: 0.010% or more and 0.130% or less, Si: 0.04% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 1.00% or less, P: 0.007% or more and 0.100% or less, S: 0.0005% or more and 0.0090% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.100% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.0050% or more and 0.1000% or less, and Cr: 0.08% or less, and satisfying a relationship 0.005≤(Ti*/48)/(C/12)≤0.700 where Ti*=Ti−1.5S, with a balance including Fe and inevitable impurities;a microstructure in which a proportion of cementite in ferrite grains is 10% or less; andan upper yield strength of 550 MPa or more.
  • 2. The steel sheet for cans according to claim 1, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from Nb: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, Mo: 0.0050% or more and 0.0500% or less, and B: 0.0020% or more and 0.0100% or less.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2018-238544 Dec 2018 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2019/044589 11/13/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/129482 6/25/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
5454883 Yoshie et al. Oct 1995 A
6221180 Tosaka et al. Apr 2001 B1
10415111 Tada et al. Sep 2019 B2
10907236 Oka et al. Feb 2021 B2
20100116832 Nishihara et al. May 2010 A1
20190367210 Smith Dec 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
1263568 Aug 2000 CN
1946866 Apr 2007 CN
101014727 Aug 2007 CN
104520461 Apr 2015 CN
104789866 Jul 2015 CN
106605006 Apr 2017 CN
107923013 Apr 2018 CN
108118248 Jun 2018 CN
1741800 Jan 2007 EP
1806420 Jul 2007 EP
2138596 Dec 2009 EP
2871255 May 2015 EP
3476964 Jan 2021 EP
H08325670 Dec 1996 JP
2001089828 Apr 2001 JP
2004183074 Jul 2004 JP
2009132984 Jun 2009 JP
5858208 Feb 2016 JP
2016211047 Dec 2016 JP
2018059196 Apr 2018 JP
1020090122366 Nov 2009 KR
1020170121277 Nov 2017 KR
2015166653 Nov 2015 WO
2016060248 Apr 2016 WO
2016157878 Oct 2016 WO
2018061787 Apr 2018 WO
2018136290 Jul 2018 WO
2018194135 Oct 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Nov. 9, 2022, Office Action issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office in the corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7018754 with English language concise statement of relevance.
Oct. 27, 2023, Office Action issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 202211517205.8 with English language search report.
May 6, 2022, Office Action issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201980084585.0 with English language search report.
Wang Xuewu, Metal Materials and Heat Treatment, Jul. 31, 2018, p. 191.
Wu Run et al., Steel quality and failure analysis of its components, Apr. 30, 2018, pp. 138-139.
Feb. 18, 2020, International Search Report issued in the International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2019/044589.
May 13, 2020, Office Action issued by the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office in the corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 108144959 with English language Search Report.
Mar. 24, 2022, the Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office in the corresponding European Patent Application No. 19900454.0.
Sep. 20, 2022, Office Action issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201980084585.0 with English language search report.
Lu Jinsheng et al., Handbook for X-Ray Identification of Common Phases in Steels and Alloys, Oct. 31, 1990, p. 8.
Liu Zhengdong, Design and Practice of Selective Strengthening of Heat Resistant Materials for Power Stations, Jan. 31, 2017, p. 14.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220074031 A1 Mar 2022 US