The invention relates generally to methods and systems for the directional drilling of wells, particularly wells for the production of petroleum products. More specifically, it relates to steerable systems run on coiled tubing.
It is known that when drilling oil and gas wells for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons, it is often necessary to deviate the well off vertical and in a particular direction. This is called directional drilling. Directional drilling is used for increasing the drainage of a particular well by, for example, forming deviated branch bores from a primary borehole. Also it is useful in the marine environment, wherein a single offshore production platform can reach several hydrocarbon reservoirs, thanks to several deviated wells that spread out in any direction from the production platform.
Directional drilling systems usually fall within two categories: push-the-bit and point-the-bit systems, classified by their mode of operation. Push-the-bit systems operate by applying pressure to the side walls of the formation containing the well. Point-the-bit systems aim the drill bit to the desired direction, thereby causing deviation of the wellbore as the bit drills the well's bottom.
Push-the-bit systems are known and are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,206,108 issued to MacDonald et al. on Mar. 27, 2001, and International patent application no. PCT/GB00/00822 published on Sep. 28, 2000 by Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. These references describe steerable drilling systems that have a plurality of adjustable or expandable ribs or pads located around the corresponding tool collar. The drilling direction can be controlled by applying pressure on the well's sidewalls through the selective extension or retraction of the individual ribs or pads.
Point-the-bit systems are usually based on the principle that when two oppositely rotating shafts are united by a joint and form an angle different than zero, the second shaft will not orbit around the central rotational axis of the first shaft, provided the two rates of rotation of both shafts are equal.
Various point-the-bit techniques have been developed which incorporate a method of achieving directional control by offsetting or pointing the bit in the desired direction as the tool rotates. One such point-the-bit technique is outlined in U.S. Pat. No. 6,092,610 issued to Kosmala et al. on Jul. 25, 2000, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This patent describes an actively controlled rotary steerable drilling system for directional drilling of wells having a tool collar rotated by a drill string during well drilling. The bit shaft is supported by a universal joint within the collar and rotatably driven by the collar. To achieve controlled steering of the rotating drill bit, orientation of the bit shaft relative to the tool collar is sensed and the bit shaft is maintained geostationary and selectively axially inclined relative to the tool collar. This position is maintained during drill string rotation by rotating it about the universal joint via an offsetting mandrel that is rotated counter to collar rotation and at the same frequency of rotation. An electric motor provides rotation to the offsetting mandrel with respect to the tool collar and is servo-controlled by signal input from position sensing elements. When necessary, a brake is used to maintain the offsetting mandrel and the bit shaft axis geostationary. Alternatively, a turbine is connected to the offsetting mandrel to provide rotation to the offsetting mandrel with respect to the tool collar and a brake is used to servo-control the turbine by signal input from position sensors.
Current rotary steerable systems are run on drill string and thus inherit the operational limitations associated with the drill string. An attempt has been made to combine a rotary steerable system with coiled tubing as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,028,789. This reference discloses an integrated motor and steering system for coiled tubing drilling. However, as will be discussed below, the apparatus described in the U.S. Pat. No. 7,028,789 has several inherent disadvantages overcome by the teachings of the present invention.
In general, the present invention provides a drilling system and method in which a drilling assembly is delivered downhole on a coiled tubing. The drilling assembly comprises a drill bit, steerable system and a motor to rotate the steerable system and drill bit for drilling of a borehole. The steerable system is used to steer the drill bit, thereby enabling formation of boreholes in a variety of orientations and trajectories.
Certain embodiments of the invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The present invention relates to a system and methodology for coiled tubing drilling. A bottom hole assembly used as a coiled tubing drilling assembly is controllable to enable formation of wellbores along a number of selected trajectories. The bottom hole assembly can comprise steerable systems of a variety of sizes and configurations, ranging from ultra-slim steerable systems to coiled tubing drilling applications designed to drill much larger boreholes. Accordingly, conventional operating costs are reduced and the rig required for the coiled tubing drilling operation has a smaller footprint than conventional drilling rigs.
When the steering system, described below, is run below a mud motor in coiled tubing drilling, it enables continuous trajectory control. This results in a smoother well trajectory and reduced friction, thereby enabling better weight transfer to the bit, increased rate of production, and longer step-outs as the undulations and tortuosity are significantly reduced. Tool face control also is much improved, because the reactive torque in the coiled tubing from the mud motor is automatically compensated for by the rotary steerable system.
In embodiments described below, the steering system is a fully rotating rotary steering system. When used in coiled tubing drilling applications, the fully rotating aspects provide reduced friction and further step-out capability compared to existing systems that use non-rotating string elements, such as those found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,028,789. Furthermore, the present coiled tubing drilling system uses modular elements that can be moved, added or interchanged. For example, discreet, modular bottom hole assembly elements provide greater operational flexibility and enable a fully rotating steering system in contrast to the non-modular system described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,028,789. Modular tractor systems also may be incorporated into the coiled tubing drilling system to, for example, facilitate system movement and further enhance step-out capability.
The rotary steerable system also comprises processing capability sufficient to enable it to receive data from sensors, such as near-bit sensors, and to transmit that data to a surface system. The processing capability also can be used to control the steerable system from below the mud motor. Although the transfer of data to the surface collection location can be delayed, the embodiments described herein can readily provide a real-time communication of data from the rotary steerable system and its near-bit sensors to the surface location. This, of course, enables real-time monitoring of the drilling operation.
It should be noted that embodiments of the present invention can incorporate full rotation of all elements in the rotary steerable system. Furthermore, this rotatable system can either be a push-the-bit or a point-the-bit type system. Also, it should be understood the term “mud motor” can designate a variety of mud motor types, such as positive displacement or turbine type drilling motors.
One embodiment of a coiled tubing drilling system 20 is illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
Steerable system 28 comprises data processing capability via a controller/processor 36 that receives data from steerable system sensors 38. Steerable system 28 may also include a pad/actuator to push the bit 30. The data collected from the sensors is transmitted uphole to, for example, a surface location for further analysis. Similarly, the measurement-while-drilling system also transfers data uphole. The data transfer uphole to the surface location or downhole can be accomplished through a variety of telemetry techniques, including mud-pulse telemetry, electromagnetic (E-mag) telemetry, wire-line telemetry, fiber optic telemetry, or through other communications systems and techniques. By way of example, the measurement-while-drilling system 34 located below motor 32 may utilize mud-pulse communication that relies on relatively long wavelengths. A passive power source 42, such as a battery, can be incorporated into the measurement-while-drilling system to enable a survey while the mud pumps and motor are shut off so that the measurement-while-drilling system sensors are stationary. In this example, the communications to surface from steerable system 28 are in real-time via measurement-while-drilling system 34. It should be further noted that processor 36 also can be used to control operation of steerable system 28 from a location below mud motor 32.
Another embodiment of coiled tubing drilling system 20 is illustrated in
In the embodiments illustrated in
As illustrated in
When measurement-while-drilling system 34 is located above motor 32, the communication of data, particularly real-time data, from steerable system 28 requires transfer of data across mud motor 32. For example, data from steerable system 28 can be communicated to measurement-while-drilling system 34 for transmission to the surface via a suitable telemetry method, such as those discussed above. A variety of telemetry systems potentially can be utilized to transfer data across the mud motor. However, one embodiment utilizes a plurality of transceivers 48, such as wireless receiver/transmitters, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Modules 26 also may comprise an axial movement module in the form of an axial device 50, e.g. a tractor system, a thruster, a crawler, or other suitable device, connected between coiled tubing 24 and mud motor 32, as illustrated in
Axial device 50 also may comprise a continuous-type tractor system 54, as illustrated in
In another embodiment of the invention, illustrated in
Depending on the specific drilling operation, coiled tubing drilling system 20 may be constructed in a variety of configurations. Additionally, the use of modular components, provides great adaptability and flexibility in constructing the appropriate bottom hole assembly for a given environment and drilling operation. The actual size and construction of individual modules can be adjusted as needed or desired to facilitate specific types of drilling operations. The size of the coiled tubing also may vary depending on the environment and the desired wellbore to be drilled.
Accordingly, although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this invention. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims.
The present document is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/747,074, filed May 11, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4185704 | Nixon | Jan 1980 | A |
4463814 | Horstmeyer | Aug 1984 | A |
4471843 | Jones et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4947944 | Coltman | Aug 1990 | A |
5060737 | Mohn | Oct 1991 | A |
5139094 | Prevedel | Aug 1992 | A |
5156222 | Jurgens | Oct 1992 | A |
5163521 | Pustanyk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168941 | Krueger | Dec 1992 | A |
5311952 | Eddison et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318137 | Johnson | Jun 1994 | A |
5318138 | Dewey | Jun 1994 | A |
5332048 | Underwood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5394951 | Pringle | Mar 1995 | A |
5419405 | Patton | May 1995 | A |
5452772 | Van Den Bergh | Sep 1995 | A |
5485889 | Gray | Jan 1996 | A |
5603386 | Webster | Feb 1997 | A |
5812068 | Wisler | Sep 1998 | A |
5842149 | Harrell | Nov 1998 | A |
6047784 | Dorel | Apr 2000 | A |
6092610 | Kosmala | Jul 2000 | A |
6206108 | MacDonald et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244361 | Comeau | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6446737 | Fontana et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7028789 | Krueger | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20030075361 | Terry et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030127252 | Downton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040050589 | Head | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050056463 | Aronstam et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0787886 | Apr 1905 | EP |
2398308 | Apr 1946 | GB |
2105880 | Feb 1998 | RU |
2148696 | May 2000 | RU |
2148696 | Jun 2000 | RU |
0057018 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
25.0397RU—Decision of Grant dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
25.0397MX—Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070261887 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60747074 | May 2006 | US |