Steerable speaker array, system, and method for the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11445294
  • Patent Number
    11,445,294
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 22, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 13, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A steerable speaker array is provided, comprising a plurality of drivers arranged in a concentric, nested configuration formed by arranging the drivers in a plurality of concentric groups and placing the groups at different radial distances from a central point of the configuration. Each group is formed by a subset of the plurality of drivers being positioned at predetermined intervals from each other along a perimeter of the group. Also, the concentric groups are harmonically nested and rotationally offset from each other. An audio system is also provided comprising at least one steerable speaker array and a beamforming system configured to receive one or more input audio signals from an audio source, generate a separate audio output signal for each driver of the speaker array based on at least one of the input signals, and provide the audio output signals to the corresponding drivers to produce a beamformed audio output.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This application generally relates to a speaker system. In particular, this application relates to a speaker system comprising at least one steerable speaker array and methods for implementing and controlling the same.


BACKGROUND

Loudspeaker, or sound reproduction, systems comprising a plurality of speakers are commonly found in office spaces or conferencing environments, public spaces, including theaters, entertainment venues, and transportation hubs, homes, automobiles, and other listening environments. The number, size, quality, arrangement, and type of the speakers can affect sound quality and listening experience. However, most listening environments can only accommodate a certain number, size, type, and/or arrangement of speakers due to spatial and/or aesthetic limitations, limits on expense and/or computational complexity, and other constraints. For example, massive speaker systems with larger cone sizes may be suitable for concert halls and other music applications requiring a high fidelity, full-range response, e.g., 20 Hz to 20 kHz, but typically, are not preferred for office spaces and conferencing environments. Rather, such environments often include speakers that are aesthetically designed to minimize the visual impact of the speaker system and acoustically designed to provide increased intelligibility and other preferred characteristics for voice applications.


One existing type of loudspeaker system is the line array comprising a linear arrangement of transducers with predetermined spacing or distances between the transducers. Typically, the transducers are arranged in a planar array and located on a front plate of a single housing or mounting frame with all of the transducers facing forward, or away from the front plate. A common line array is the “column speaker,” which consists of a long line of closely spaced identical transducers or drivers placed in an upright, forward-facing position. Line arrays provide the ability to steer the sound beams output by the individual speakers towards a given listener using appropriate beamforming techniques (e.g., signal processing). For example, the transducers of an upright column speaker can provide a controlled degree of directionality in the vertical plane. The directivity of a line array depends on several, somewhat conflicting properties. Longer lines of drivers permit greater directional control at lower frequencies, while closer spacing between drivers permits greater directional control at higher frequencies. Also, as frequency decreases, beam width increases, causing beam focus to decrease. A two-dimensional speaker array comprised of several individual line arrays arranged in rows and columns may be capable of providing control in all directions. However, such systems are difficult to design and expensive to implement due at least in part to the large number of drivers required to provide directivity across all frequencies.


Accordingly, there is an opportunity for systems that address these concerns. More particularly, there is an opportunity for systems including a speaker array that is unobtrusive, easy to install into an existing environment, and allows for adjustment of the speaker array, including steering discrete lobes to desired listeners or other locations.


SUMMARY

The invention is intended to solve the above-noted problems by providing systems and methods that are designed to, among other things, provide: (1) a steerable speaker array comprising a concentric, nested configuration of transducers that achieves improved directivity over the voice frequency range and an optimal main to side lobe ratio over a prescribed steering angle range; and (2) enhanced audio features by utilizing the steerable speaker array in combination with a steerable microphone or microphone array, such as, for example, acoustic echo cancellation, crosstalk minimization, voice-lift, dynamic noise masking, and spatialized audio streams.


According to one aspect, a speaker array is provided. The speaker array comprises a plurality of drivers arranged in a concentric, nested configuration formed by arranging the drivers in a plurality of concentric groups and placing the groups at different radial distances from a central point of the configuration. Each group is formed by a subset of the plurality of drivers being positioned at predetermined intervals from each other along a perimeter of the group. The groups are rotationally offset from each other relative to a central axis of the array that passes through the central point. The different radial distances are configured such that the concentric groups are harmonically nested.


According to another aspect, a method, performed by one or more processors to generate a beamformed audio output using an audio system comprising a speaker array having a plurality of drivers, is provided. The method comprises receiving one or more input audio signals from an audio source coupled to the audio system; generating a separate audio output signal for each driver of the speaker array based on at least one of the input audio signals, the drivers being arranged in a plurality of concentric groups positioned at different radial distances relative to a central point to form a concentric, nested configuration; and providing the audio output signals to the corresponding drivers to produce a beamformed audio output. The generating comprises, for each driver: obtaining one or more filter values and at least one delay value associated with the driver, at least one of the one or more filter values being assigned to the driver based on the concentric group in which the driver is located, applying the at least one filter value to one or more filters to produce a filtered output signal for the driver, providing the filtered output signal to a delay element associated with the driver, applying the at least one delay value to the delay element to produce a delayed output signal for the driver, and providing the delayed output signal to a power amplifier in order to amplify the signal by a predetermined gain amount.


According to another aspect, an audio system is provided. The audio system comprises a first speaker array comprising a plurality of drivers arranged in a plurality of concentric groups positioned at different radial distances from a central point to form a concentric, nested configuration, each group being formed by a subset of the plurality of drivers being positioned at predetermined intervals from each other along a perimeter of the group. The audio system further comprises a beamforming system coupled to the first speaker array and configured to: receive one or more input audio signals from an audio source, generate a separate audio output signal for each driver of the first speaker array based on at least one of the input audio signal, and provide the audio output signals to the corresponding drivers to produce a beamformed audio output.


According to yet another aspect, a speaker system is provided. The speaker system comprises a planar speaker array disposed in a substantially flat housing and comprising a plurality of drivers arranged in a two-dimensional configuration, the speaker array having an aperture size of less than 60 centimeters and being configured to simultaneously form a plurality of dynamically steerable lobes directed towards multiple locations. The speaker system further comprises a beamforming system coupled to the speaker array and configured to digitally process one or more input audio signals, generate a corresponding audio output signal for each driver, and direct each output signal towards a designated one of the multiple locations.


These and other embodiments, and various permutations and aspects, will become apparent and be more fully understood from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings, which set forth illustrative embodiments that are indicative of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary speaker array in accordance with certain embodiments.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram depicting an exemplary speaker system in accordance with certain embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram depicting an exemplary audio processing system of the speaker system shown in FIG. 2, in accordance with certain embodiments.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method of generating a beamformed audio output using the speaker system of FIG. 2, in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 5 is a response plot showing select frequency responses of the speaker array of FIG. 1 in accordance with certain embodiments.



FIGS. 6A and 6B and FIGS. 7A and 7B are polar plots showing select polar responses of the speaker array of FIG. 1 in accordance with certain embodiments.



FIGS. 8-10 are diagrams of exemplary use cases for the speaker array of FIG. 1, in accordance with embodiments.



FIG. 11 is a block diagram depicting an exemplary audio system in accordance with certain embodiments.



FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary implementation of the audio system of FIG. 11 in a drop ceiling, in accordance with certain embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The description that follows describes, illustrates and exemplifies one or more particular embodiments of the invention in accordance with its principles. This description is not provided to limit the invention to the embodiments described herein, but rather to explain and teach the principles of the invention in such a way to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to understand these principles and, with that understanding, be able to apply them to practice not only the embodiments described herein, but also other embodiments that may come to mind in accordance with these principles. The scope of the invention is intended to cover all such embodiments that may fall within the scope of the appended claims, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.


It should be noted that in the description and drawings, like or substantially similar elements may be labeled with the same reference numerals. However, sometimes these elements may be labeled with differing numbers, such as, for example, in cases where such labeling facilitates a more clear description. Additionally, the drawings set forth herein are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances proportions may have been exaggerated to more clearly depict certain features. Such labeling and drawing practices do not necessarily implicate an underlying substantive purpose. As stated above, the specification is intended to be taken as a whole and interpreted in accordance with the principles of the invention as taught herein and understood to one of ordinary skill in the art.


With respect to the exemplary systems, components and architecture described and illustrated herein, it should also be understood that the embodiments may be embodied by, or employed in, numerous configurations and components, including one or more systems, hardware, software, or firmware configurations or components, or any combination thereof, as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, while the drawings illustrate exemplary systems including components for one or more of the embodiments contemplated herein, it should be understood that with respect to each embodiment, one or more components may not be present or necessary in the system.


Systems and methods are provided herein for a speaker system that includes a plurality of electroacoustic transducers or drivers selectively arranged to form a high-performing planar array capable of presenting audio source material in a narrowly directed, dynamically steerable sound beam and simultaneously presenting different source materials to different locations using individually steerable beams. The drivers are arranged in a harmonically nested and geometrically optimized configuration to allow for polar pattern formation capable of generating highly spatially-controlled and steerable beams with an optimal directivity index.


In embodiments, the array configuration is achieved by arranging the drivers in a plurality of concentrically-positioned groups (e.g., rings or other formations), which enables the speaker array to have equivalent beam width performance for any given look angle in a three-dimensional (e.g., X-Y-Z) space. As a result, the speaker array described herein can provide a more consistent output and improved directivity than existing arrays with linear, rectangular, or square constellations. Further, each concentric group within the configuration of drivers is rotationally offset from every other group in order to avoid radial and axial symmetry. This enables the speaker array described herein to minimize side lobe growth or provide a maximal main-to-side-lobe ratio, unlike existing speaker arrays with co-linearly positioned speaker elements. The offset configuration can also tolerate further beam steering, which allows the speaker array to cover a wider listening area. Moreover, the speaker array configuration described herein can be harmonically nested to optimize beam width over a given set of distinct frequency bands (e.g., across the voice frequency range).



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary speaker array 100 comprising a plurality of individually steerable speakers 102 (also referred to herein as “drivers”) arranged in a two-dimensional configuration, in accordance with embodiments. Each of the speakers 102 may be an electroacoustic transducer or any other type of driver configured to convert an electrical audio signal into a corresponding sound including, for example, dynamic drivers, piezoelectric transducers, planar magnetic drivers, electrostatic transducers, MEMS drivers, compression drivers, etc. The sound output by the speaker array 100 may represent any type of input audio signal including, for example, live or real-time audio spoken by human speakers, pre-recorded audio files reproduced by an audio player, streaming audio received from a remote audio source using a network connection, etc. In some cases, the input audio signal can be a digital audio signal, and the digital audio signals may conform to the Dante standard for transmitting audio over Ethernet or another standard. In other cases, the input audio signal may be an analog audio signal, and the speaker array 100 may be coupled to components, such as analog to digital converters, processors, and/or other components, to process the analog audio signals and ultimately generate one or more digital audio output signals (e.g., as shown in FIG. 3).


The sounds produced by the speaker array 100 can be directed towards one or more listeners (e.g., human listeners) within a room (e.g., conference room), or other location, using beamforming techniques, as described herein. In some embodiments, the speaker array 100 may be configured to simultaneously produce multiple audio outputs based on different audio signals received from a plurality of audio sources, with each audio output being directed to a different location or listener.


As shown in FIG. 1, the drivers 102 are all arranged in a single plane and are forward-facing, or have a front face pointed towards the room or environment in which the speaker array 100 is installed. Each of the drivers 102 has a separate enclosed volume extending away from the front face of the driver 102. The enclosed volume forms a cylindrical cavity that, at least in part, determines a depth of the operating space required for the speaker array 100. For example, in one embodiment, each of the drivers 102 has an enclosure volume of 25 cubic centimeter (cc), which forms a cylindrical cavity of a known height behind the driver 102. This height may define a minimum depth for the speaker array 100, or a housing comprising the speaker array 100. In some embodiments, a back or rear face of the speaker array 100 may look like a honeycomb due to the independent cavities of the drivers 102 extending up and away from the front face of the array 100 and being arranged in close proximity to each other.


As shown, the drivers 102 can be coupled to, or included on, a support 104 for securing and supporting the drivers 102. The drivers 102 may be embedded into the support 104 or otherwise mechanically attached thereto (e.g., suspended from wires attached to the support 104). In the illustrated embodiment, all of the drivers 102 are positioned on the same surface or side of the support 104 (e.g., a front or top face). In other embodiments, at least some of the drivers 102 may be arranged on a first side or surface of the support 104, while the rest of the drivers 102 are arranged on the opposite side or surface of the support 104. In some embodiments, the drivers 102 may be distributed across multiple supports or surfaces.


The support 104 may be any suitable planar surface, including, for example, a flat plate, a frame, a printed circuit board, a substrate, etc., and may have any suitable size or shape, including, for example a square, as shown in FIG. 1, a rectangle, a circle, a hexagon, etc. In other embodiments, the support 104 may be a curved or domed surface having, for example, a concave or convex shape. In still other embodiments, each of the drivers 102 may be individually positioned, or suspended, in the environment without connection to a common support or housing. In such cases, the drivers 102 may be wirelessly connected to an audio processing system to receive audio output signals and may form a distributed network of speakers.


In the illustrated embodiment, the speaker array 100 is encased in a housing 106 configured to protect and structurally support the drivers 102 and support 104. The housing 106 may include a sound-permeable front face made of fabric, film, wire mesh, or other suitable material, and an enclosed rear face made of metal, plastic, or other suitable material. A depth of the housing 106 may be selected to accommodate the acoustical cavity required by each of the drivers 102, as described herein. While the illustrated embodiment shows a substantially flat, square housing 106 and support 104, other sizes and shapes are also contemplated, including, for example, domed shapes, spherical shapes, parabolic shapes, oval or circular shapes, or other types of polygons (e.g., rectangle, triangle, pentagon, etc.).


In some embodiments, the housing 106 is configured for attachment to a ceiling so that the speaker array 100 faces down towards or over the listeners in a room or other environment. For example, the speaker array 100 may be placed over a conference table and may be used to reproduce an audio signal representing speech or spoken words received from a remote audio source associated with the conferencing environment. As another example, the speaker array 100 may be placed in an open office environment, above a cluster of cubicles or other suitable location. In a preferred embodiment, the housing 106 may be flush mounted to the ceiling or other surface to gain certain acoustic benefits, such for example, infinite baffling.


In one embodiment, a size and shape of the housing 106 may be configured to substantially match that of a standard ceiling tile, so that the speaker array 100 can be attached to a drop ceiling (or a secondary ceiling hung below a main, structural ceiling) in place of, or adjacent to, one of the ceiling tiles that make up the drop ceiling. For example, the housing 106 may be square-shaped, and each side of the housing 106 may have a length of about 60 cm, or about 24 inches, depending on whether the drop ceiling is according to European specifications or U.S. specifications. In one embodiment, an overall aperture size of the speaker array 100 may be less than 60 centimeters (or less than 24 inches), in order to fit within the housing 106.


The speaker array 100 can be further configured for optimal performance at a certain height, or range of heights, above a floor of the environment, for example, in accordance with standard ceiling heights (e.g., eight to ten feet high), or any other appropriate height range (e.g., ceiling to table height). In other embodiments, the speaker array 100 is configured for attachment to a vertical wall for directing audio towards the listeners from one side of the environment.


As shown in FIG. 1, the plurality of drivers 102 includes a central driver 102a positioned at a central point (0,0) of the support 104 and a remaining set of the drivers 102b arranged in a concentric, nested configuration surrounding the central driver 102a, thus forming a two-dimensional array. Due, at least in part, to the geometry of this concentric, nested configuration, the speaker array 100 can achieve a constant beam width over a preset audio frequency range (e.g., the voice frequencies), improved directional sensitivity across the preset range, and maximal main-to-side-lobe ratio over a prescribed steering angle range, enabling the speaker array 100 to more precisely direct sound towards selected locations or listeners. Moreover, as compared to a linear array, the two-dimensional design of the speaker array 100 described herein requires fewer drivers 102 to achieve the same directional performance, thus reducing the overall size and weight of the array 100.


In embodiments, the central driver 102a can be used as a reference point for creating axial symmetry in the array 100, and the concentric, nested configuration can be formed by arranging the remaining drivers 102b in concentric groups 108, 110, 112, 114 around the central driver 102a. Each group contains a different subset or collection of the drivers 102b. During operation, two or more groups of drivers 102b and/or the central driver 102a may be selected to work together and form a “sub-nest” configured to produce a desired speaker output, such as, for example, high directivity and steerability in a given frequency band. The number of sub-nests that may be formed using the drivers 102 can vary depending on the beamforming techniques used, the covered frequency bands, the total number of drivers 102 in the array 100, the total number of groups of drivers 102, etc.


As shown, the groups 108, 110, 112, 114 are positioned at progressively larger radial distances from the central point (0,0) of the array 100 in order to cover progressively lower frequency octaves and create a harmonically nested configuration. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, the first group 108 is immediately adjacent to the central driver 102a and is nested within the second group 110, while the second group 110 is nested within the third group 112, and the third group 112 is nested within the fourth group 114. In addition, the radial distances of the groups 108-114 may double in size with each nesting in accordance with harmonic nesting techniques. For example, the radial distance of the second group 110 is double the radial distance of the first group 108, the radial distance of the third group 112 is double that of the second group 110, etc. As shown, in some embodiments, the concentric groups 108-114 may be circular in shape and may form rings of different sizes. For example, in FIG. 1, a circle has been drawn through each group of drivers 102b for ease of explanation and illustration. Other shapes for the groups of drivers 102b are also contemplated, including, for example, oval or other oblong shapes, rectangular or square shapes, triangles or other polygon shapes, etc.


Within each of the groups 108-114, the individual drivers 102b may be evenly spaced apart, or positioned at predetermined intervals, along a circumference, or perimeter, of the group. The exact distance between neighboring drivers 102b (e.g., center to center) within a given group may vary depending on an overall size (e.g., radius) of the group, the size of each driver 102, the shape of the groups, and the number of drivers 102b included in the group, as will be appreciated. For example, in FIG. 1, the drivers 102b in groups 108 and 110 are adjacent or nearly adjacent to each other because those two groups have smaller diameters, while groups 112 and 114 have larger diameters and therefore, larger spaces between their respective drivers 102b.


In the illustrated example, the speaker array 100 comprises a total of fifty identical drivers 102, each driver 102 having a 20 millimeter (mm) diameter. The first driver 102a is placed in the central reference point, while the remaining forty-nine drivers 102b are arranged in the four concentric groups 108, 110, 112, 114 with progressively increasing radial distances to create the nested configuration. The increased driver density created by concentrically grouping or clustering the drivers 102 in this manner can minimize side lobes and improve directivity, thereby enabling the speaker array 100 to accommodate a wider range of audio frequencies with varying beam width control. The exact number of drivers 102b included in each group 108-114 and the total number of drivers 102 included in the speaker array 100 may depend on a number of considerations, including, for example, a size of the individual drivers 102, the configuration of the harmonic nests, a desired density for the drivers in the array, a preset operating frequency range of the array 100 and other desired performance standards, and constraints on physical space (e.g., due to a limit on the overall dimensions of the housing 106) and/or processing power (e.g., number of processors, number of outputs per processor, processing speeds, etc.). For example, in one embodiment, only forty-eight of the fifty drivers 102 are active because of hardware limitations. In other embodiments, the speaker array 100 may include more than fifty drivers 102, for example, by adding a fifth concentric group outside outermost group 114 to better accommodate lower frequencies.


In some embodiments, the geometry and harmonic nesting of the drivers 102 included in the center of the array 100, namely cluster 118 formed by central driver 102a and the drivers 102b of groups 108 and 110, may be configured to further extend a low frequency output of the speaker array 100 (or operate in low frequency bands) without requiring a larger overall size for the array. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, the drivers 102b of the first group 108 are adjacent to each other and in close proximity to the central microphone 102a. Likewise, the drivers 102b of the second group 110 are also adjacent to each other and in close proximity to the first group 108. During operation, the drivers 102 forming the cluster 118 may effectively operate as one larger speaker with an aperture size roughly equivalent to a total width of the cluster 118. In embodiments, the speaker array 100 can combine the cluster 118 of drivers 102 with the drivers 102b in the outer groups 112 and/or 114 to provide better low frequency sensitivity (or operation) than that of each individual driver 102. For example, in embodiments where each driver 102 has a 20 mm aperture size, an effective aperture size of the central cluster 118 may be about four inches. In such cases, the speaker array 100 can be configured to provide a low frequency sensitivity of about 100 Hz, which is much lower than that of a single driver 102 (e.g., 400 Hz).


In some embodiments, the number of drivers 102b in each group can be configured to maximize a main-to-side-lobe ratio of the speaker array 100 and thereby, produce an improved beam width with a near constant frequency response across all frequencies within the preset range. For example, the main-to-side-lobe ratio may be maximized by including an odd number of drivers 102b in the first group 108 and by including a multiple of the odd number in each of the other groups 110, 112, and 114. In one embodiment, the odd number is selected from a group of prime numbers in order to further avoid axial alignment between the drivers 102 and mitigate the side lobe effects across different octaves within the overall operating range of the speaker array (for example and without limitation, 100 Hz to 10 KHz). For example, in FIG. 1, the number of drivers 102b included in the first group 108 is seven, and the number of drivers 102b in each of the other groups 110, 112, 114 is a multiple of seven, or fourteen. In some embodiments, the number of drivers 102b included in each group may be selected to create a repeating pattern that can be easily extended to cover more audio frequencies by adding one or more concentric groups, or easily reduced to cover fewer frequencies by removing one or more groups. In other embodiments, the number of drivers 102b in the first group 108 may be any integer greater than one and the number of drivers 102b in each of the other groups 110, 112, 114 may be a multiple of that number.


The exact diameter or circumference of each group 108, 110, 112, 114, and/or the radial distance between each group and the central point (0,0), can vary depending on the desired frequency range of the speaker array 100 and a desired sensitivity or overall sound pressure for the drivers 102b in that group, as well as a size of each individual driver 102. In some embodiments, a diameter or size of each group may define the lowest frequency at which the drivers 102b within that group can optimally operate without interference or other negative effects (e.g., due to grating lobes). For example, a radial distance of the outermost group 114 may be selected to enable optimal operation at the lowest frequencies in the predetermined operating range, while a radial distance of the innermost group 108 may be selected to enable optimal operation at the highest frequencies in the predetermined range, and the remaining ring diameters or radial distances can be determined by subdividing the remaining frequency range.


In embodiments, the total number of driver groups included in the speaker array 100 can also determine the optimal frequency or operating range of the array 100. For example, the speaker array 100 may be configured to operate in a wider range of frequencies by increasing the number of groups to more than four. In other embodiments, the speaker array 100 may have fewer than the four groups shown in FIG. 1 (e.g., three groups).


In a preferred embodiment, the radial distance of each group 108, 110, 112, 114 is twice the radial distance of the smaller group nested immediately inside that group in accordance with the harmonic nesting approach. For example, in FIG. 1, the first group 108 is positioned on a radial centerline of 25.5 millimeters (mm) from the central point (0,0), the second group 110 is positioned on a radial centerline of 51 mm from the central point (i.e. twice the radial distance of the first group 108), the third group 112 is positioned on a radial centerline of 102 mm from the central point (i.e. twice the radial distance of the second group 110), and the fourth group 114 is positioned on a radial centerline of 204 mm from the central point (i.e. twice the radial distance of the third group 112).


In embodiments, each of the groups 108-114 may be at least slightly rotated relative to central axis 116 (e.g., the x-axis), which passes through the center point (0,0) of the array (e.g., the central speaker 102a), in order to optimize the directivity of the speaker array 100. For example, the rotational offset can be configured to eliminate undesired interference that can occur when more than two drivers 102 are aligned. In some embodiments, the groups 108-114 can be rotationally offset from each other, for example, by rotating each group a different number of degrees relative to the central axis 116, so that no more than two of the drivers 102 are axially aligned, or co-linear. In some embodiments, the number of degrees for the offset is an integer greater than one, or a multiple of that integer, and is selected to further avoid alignment and minimize co-linearity. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, each of the groups are rotationally offset from the x-axis 116 by 17 degrees or a multiple thereof. In particular, the first group 108 is offset by 17 degrees, the second group 110 is offset by 34 degrees, the third group 112 is offset by 51 degrees, and the fourth group 114 is offset by 68 degrees. In other embodiments, the rotational offset may be more arbitrarily implemented, if at all, and/or other methods may be utilized to optimize the overall directivity of the microphone array. Regardless of the method, rotationally offsetting the drivers 102 can configure the speaker array 100 to constrain sensitivity to the main lobes, thereby maximizing main lobe response and reducing side lobe response.


As will be appreciated, FIG. 1 only shows an exemplary embodiment of the speaker array 100 and other configurations are contemplated in accordance with the principles disclosed herein. For example, while a specific number of drivers 102 and groups 108-114 are shown in the illustrated embodiment, other numbers and combinations of speaker elements are also contemplated, including adding more drivers and/or groups to help accommodate a wider frequency range (e.g., lower and/or higher frequencies). For example, by increasing the number of drivers 102b in each ring and/or the number of rings, a driver density across the array is also increased, which can help further minimize grating lobes and thereby, produce an improved beam width with a near constant frequency response across all frequencies within the preset range.


In some embodiments, the plurality of drivers 102 may be arranged in concentric rings around a central point, but without a driver positioned at the central point (e.g., without the central driver 102a). In other embodiments, only a portion of the drivers 102 may be arranged in concentric rings, and the remaining portion of the drivers 102 may be positioned at various points outside of, or in between, the discrete rings, at random locations on the support 104, in line arrays at the top, bottom and/or sides of the concentric rings, or in any other suitable arrangement. In some embodiments, the drivers 102 may be non-identical transducers. For example, some of the drivers 102 may be smaller (e.g., tweeters), while others may be larger (e.g., woofers), to help accommodate a wider range of frequencies.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary speaker system 200 comprising a speaker array 202 and a beamforming system 204 electrically coupled to the speaker array 202 using a single cable 206, in accordance with embodiments. The speaker system 200 (also referred to herein as an “audio system”) can be configured to direct audio source material (e.g., input audio signal(s)) in a narrow, directed beam that is dynamically steerable and highly spatially controlled. In some embodiments, the speaker system 200 is configured to simultaneously output multiple streams, corresponding to different audio source materials, to multiple locations or listeners. The speaker system 200 may be used in open office environments, conference rooms, or other environments. In some embodiments, the speaker system 200 further includes one or more microphones to provide improved performance, including minimization of crosstalk and acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) through higher source receiver isolation, as well as spatialized and multi-lingual content streams, and for use in voice-lift applications.


The speaker array 202 can be comprised of a plurality of speaker elements or drivers arranged in a harmonically nested, concentric configuration, or other geometrically optimized configuration in accordance with the techniques described herein. In embodiments, the speaker array 202 may be substantially similar to the speaker array 100 shown in FIG. 1. The beamforming system 204 can be in communication with the individual speaker elements of the speaker array 202 and can be configured to beamform or otherwise process input audio signals and generate a corresponding audio output signal for each speaker element of the speaker array 202. In embodiments, the speaker array 202 can be configured to simultaneously produce a plurality of individual audio outputs using various speakers, or combinations of speakers, and direct each audio output towards a designated location or listener, as described with respect to FIG. 3.


Various components of the speaker system 200 may be implemented using software executable by one or more computers, such as a computing device with a processor and memory, and/or by hardware (e.g., discrete logic circuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable gate arrays (PGA), field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), digital signal processors (DSP), microprocessor, etc.). For example, some or all components of the beamforming system 204 may be implemented using discrete circuitry devices and/or using one or more processors (e.g., audio processor and/or digital signal processor) (not shown) executing program code stored in a memory (not shown), the program code being configured to carry out one or more processes or operations described herein, such as, for example, method 400 shown in FIG. 4. Thus, in embodiments, the system 200 may include one or more processors, memory devices, computing devices, and/or other hardware components not shown in FIG. 2. In one embodiment, the system 200 includes at least two separate processors, one for consolidating and formatting all of the speaker elements and another for implementing digital signal processing (DSP) functionality. In other embodiments, the system 200 may perform all functionality using one processor.


The single cable 206 can be configured to transport audio signals, data signals, and power between the beamforming system 204 and the speaker array 202. Though not shown, each of the beamforming system 204 and the speaker array 202 may include an external port for receiving either end of the cable 206. In embodiments, the external ports may be Ethernet ports configured to provide power, control, and audio connectivity to the components of the speaker system 200. In such embodiments, the single cable 206 may be an Ethernet cable (e.g., CATS, CAT6, etc.) configured to be electrically coupled to the Ethernet port. In other embodiments, the speaker system 200 includes one or more other types of external ports (e.g., Universal Serial Bus (USB), mini-USB, PS/2, HDMI, VGA, serial, etc.), and the single cable 206 is configured for coupling to said other port.


The content transported via the cable 206 to and/or from the speaker array 202 may be provided by various components of the beamforming system 204. For example, electrical power may be supplied by a power source 208 (e.g., battery, wall outlet, etc.) configured to send power to the speaker array 202. The power source 208 may be an external power supply that is electrically coupled to the beamforming system 204, or an internal power source included in the beamforming system 204 and/or speaker system 200. In a preferred embodiment, the power signal is delivered through the cable 206 using Power Over Ethernet (PoE) technology (e.g., PoE++). As an example, the power source 208 may be configured to supply up to 100 watts of power (e.g., Level 4 PoE), and the cable 206 may be configured (e.g., by including at least four twisted pairs of wires) to deliver at least 75 watts to the speaker array 202.


The audio data may be provided by an audio processing system 210 of the beamforming system 204 for transmission to the speaker array 202 over the cable 206. The audio processing system 210 can be configured to receive audio signals from one or more audio sources (not shown) coupled to the speaker system 200 and perform prescribed beamforming techniques to steer and focus sound beams to be output by the speaker array 202, for example, as described with respect to FIG. 3. The audio processing system 210 may include one or more audio recorders, audio mixers, amplifiers, audio processors, bridge devices, and/or other audio components for processing electrical audio signals. In some embodiments, the audio processing system 210 can be configured to receive audio over multiple input channels and combine the received audios into one or more output channels. In some embodiments, the audio processing system 210 can be configured to direct different audio sources to different listeners of the speaker array 202. For example, in a conference room with listeners that speak different languages, the audio processing system 210 can be configured to provide each listener with a separate sound beam containing audio in the respective language of that listener.


The data signals transported over the cable 206 may include control information received from a user interface 212 of the beamforming system 204 for transmission to the speaker array 202, information provided by the audio processing system 210 for transmission to the speaker array 202, and/or information transmitted by the speaker array 202 to the beamforming system 204. As an example, the control information may include adjustments to parameters of the speaker array 202, such as, e.g., directionality, steering, gain, noise suppression, pattern forming, muting, frequency response, etc. In some embodiments, a user of the speaker system 200 may use the user interface 212 to enter control information designed to steer discrete lobes of the speaker array 202 to a particular angle, direction or location (e.g., using point and steer techniques) and/or change a shape and/or size of the lobes (e.g., using magnitude shading, lobe stretching, and/or other lobe shaping techniques).


In some cases, the user interface 212 includes a control panel coupled to a control device or processor of the beamforming system 204, the control panel including one or more switches, dimmer knobs, buttons, and the like. In other cases, the user interface 212 may be implemented using a software application executed by a processor of the beamforming system 204 and/or a mobile or web application executed by a processor of a remote device communicatively coupled to the beamforming system 204 via a wired or wireless communication network. In such cases, the user interface 212 may include a graphical layout for enabling the user to change filter values, delay values, beam width, and other controllable parameters of the audio processing system 210 using graphical sliders and buttons and/or other types of graphical inputs. The remote device may be a smartphone or other mobile phone, laptop computer, tablet computer, desktop computer, or other computing device configured to enable remote user control of the audio processing system 210 and/or speaker array 202. In some embodiments, the beamforming system 204 includes a wireless communication device (not shown) (e.g., a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and/or receiver) for facilitating wireless communication with the remote device (e.g., by transmitting and/or receiving RF signals).


Though FIG. 2 shows one speaker array 202, other embodiments may include multiple speaker arrays 202, or an array of the speaker arrays 202. In such cases, a separate cable 206 may be used to couple each array 202 to the beamforming system 204 (for example, as shown in FIG. 11 and described herein). And the audio processing system 210 may be configured to handle beamforming and other audio processing for all of the arrays 202. As an example, in some cases, two speaker arrays 202 may be placed side-by-side within one area or room. In other cases, four speaker arrays 202 may be placed respectively in the four corners of a space or room.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary audio processing system 300 for processing input audio signals to generate individual beamformed audio outputs for each of a plurality of highly steerable, highly controllable speaker elements 302, in accordance with embodiments. In particular, the audio processing system 300 includes a beamformer 304 configured to receive one or more audio input signals and generate a separate beamformed audio signal, an, for each of n speaker elements 302. In embodiments, the audio processing system 300 may be the same as, or similar to, the audio processing system 210 shown in FIG. 2, and the speaker elements 302 may be the same as, or similar to, the speaker elements of the speaker array 202 in FIG. 2 and/or the drivers 102 shown in FIG. 1. For example, the audio processing system 300 may be configured to individually control and/or steer each of the fifty drivers 102 included in the speaker array 100 shown in FIG. 1.


In embodiments, beamformer 304 comprises a filter system 306 and a plurality of delay elements 308 configured to apply pattern forming, steering, and/or other beamforming techniques to individually control the output of each speaker element 302. To help streamline these processes, sub-nests can be formed among the speaker elements 302 so as to cover specific frequency bands. For example, each sub-nest may include a collection of two or more concentric groups of speaker elements 302, a concentric group of elements plus the speaker element positioned at the center of the speaker array, a concentric group by itself, or a combination thereof. In some cases, a given speaker element 302 or group of elements may be used in more than one sub-nest. The exact number of speaker elements 302 or groups included in a given sub-nest may depend on the frequency band assigned to that sub-nest and/or an expected performance for that sub-nest.


In embodiments, beamformer 304 is implemented using one or more audio processors configured to process the input audio signal(s), for example, using filter system 306 and delay elements 308. Each processor (not shown) may comprise a digital signal processor and/or other suitable hardware (e.g., microprocessor, dedicated integrated circuit, field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc.) In one embodiment, beamformer 304 is implemented using two audio processors having 24 outputs each. In such cases, beamformer 304 can be configured to provide up to 48 outputs and therefore, can be connected to up to 48 speaker elements or drivers 302. As will be appreciated, more or fewer processors may be used so that beamformer 304 can accommodate a larger or smaller number of drivers in the speaker array.


Various components of beamformer 304, and/or the overall audio processing system 300, may be implemented using software executable by one or more computers, such as a computing device with a processor and memory, and/or by hardware (e.g., discrete logic circuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable gate arrays (PGA), field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), digital signal processors (DSP), microprocessors, etc.). For example, filter systems 306 and/or delay elements 308 may be implemented using discrete circuitry devices and/or using one or more data processors executing program code stored in a memory, the program code being configured to carry out one or more processes or operations described herein, such as, for example, all or portions of method 400 shown in FIG. 4. In some embodiments, audio processing system 300 may include additional processors, memory devices, computing devices, and/or other hardware components not shown in FIG. 3.


As shown, audio processing system 300 also includes a plurality of amplifiers 310 coupled between the beamformer 304 and the plurality of speaker elements 302, such that each output of the beamformer 304 is coupled to a respective one of the amplifiers 310, and each amplifier 310 is coupled to a respective one of the speaker elements 302. During operation, a magnitude of each individual audio signal, an, generated by the beamformer 304 for a given speaker element n is amplified by a predetermined amount of gain, or gain factor (e.g., 0.5, 1, 2, etc.), before being provided to the corresponding speaker element n. In some embodiments, the gain factor for each amplifier 310 may be selected to ensure a uniform output from the speaker elements 302, i.e. matching in magnitude. As will be appreciated, the exact number of amplifiers 310 included in the audio processing system 300 can depend on the number of speaker elements 302 included in the speaker array. In embodiments, the amplifiers 310 may be class D amplifiers or switching amplifiers, another type of electric amplifier, or any other suitable amplifier.


If the input audio signals are analog signals, the audio processing system 300 may further include an analog-to-digital converter 312 for converting the analog audio signal into a digital audio signal before it reaches the beamformer 304 for digital signal processing. In such cases, the individual audio signals an may be digital audio signals that, for example, conform to the Dante standard or another digital audio standard. The audio processing system 300 may also include a digital-to-analog converter 314 for converting each individual audio signal an back into an analog audio signal prior to amplification by the respective amplifier 310.


In some embodiments, the audio processing system 300 can further include a database 316 configured to store information used by the beamformer 304 to generate individual audio signals a1 through an. The information may include filter coefficients and/or weights for configuring the filter system 306 and/or specific time delay values or coefficients (e.g., z−k) for configuring the delay elements 308. The database 316 may store this information in a look up table or other suitable format. As an example, the table may list different filter coefficients and/or weights, as well as time delay values, for each of the speaker elements 302 and/or for each sub-nest or group of speaker elements (e.g., groups 108-114 in FIG. 1). In other embodiments, such information is programmatically generated by a processor of the audio processing system 300 and provided to the beamformer 304 as needed, to generate the individual audio signals a1 through an.


In embodiments, the filter system 306 may be configured to apply crossover filtering to the input audio signal to generate an appropriate audio output signal for each speaker element 302. The crossover filtering may include applying various filters to the input audio signal in order to isolate the signal into different or discrete frequency bands. For example, referring back to FIG. 1, there is an inverse relationship between the radial distance of each group 108-114 of drivers in the speaker array 100 and the frequency band(s) that can be optimally covered by that group. Specifically, larger apertures have a narrower low frequency beam width, and smaller apertures have more control at high frequencies. In embodiments, crossover filtering can be applied to stitch together an ideal frequency response for the speaker array 100 across a full range of operating frequencies, with better performance than that of a line array or other speaker array configurations.


As shown, the filter system 306 includes a plurality of filter banks 318, each filter bank 318 comprising a preselected combination of filters for implementing crossover filtering to generate a desired audio output. In embodiments, the filter banks 318 may be configured to set a constant beam width for the audio output of the speaker array across a wide range of frequencies. The individual filters may be configured as bandpass filters, low pass filters, high pass filters, or any other suitable type of filter for optimally isolating a particular frequency band of the input audio signal. The cutoff frequencies for each individual filter may be selected based on the specific frequency response characteristics of the corresponding sub-nest and/or speaker element, including, for example, location of frequency nulls, a desired frequency response for the speaker array, etc. The filter system 306 may include digital filters and/or analog filters. In some embodiments, the filter system 306 includes one or more finite impulse response (FIR) filters and/or infinite impulse response (HR) filters.


In some embodiments, the filter system 306 includes a separate filter bank 318 for each sub-nest of the speaker array, with N being the total number of sub-nests, and each filter bank 318 includes a separate filter for each speaker element 302 included in the corresponding sub-nest. In such cases, the exact number of filter banks 318, and the number of filters included therein, can depend on the number of sub-nests, as well as the number of speaker elements 302 included in each sub-nest. For example, in one embodiment, the speaker elements 302 may be configured as, or collected into, three different sub-nests to cover three different frequency bands and so, the filter system 306 may include three filter banks 318, one for each sub-nest. In another example embodiment, the speaker elements 302 may be configured to operate in four different sub-nests, so the filter system 306 includes at least four filter banks 318.


In still other embodiments, the filter system 306 can include a separate filter bank 318 for each of the speaker elements 302 or a separate filter bank 318 for each group of elements (e.g., groups 108, 110, 112, 114 in FIG. 1). In the latter case, for example, referring back to the speaker array 100 shown in FIG. 1, each of the groups 108, 110, 112, and 114 may be assigned a separate filter bank A, B, C, and D, respectively, from the filter system 306. Filter bank A may include at least seven individual filters, A1 through A7, one for each of the seven drivers 102b included in group 108, filter bank B may include at least fourteen individual filters, B1 through B14, one for each of the fourteen drivers included in group 110, and so on. In some embodiments, filter bank A may also include an eighth filter A8 for covering the central driver 102a.


The filter system 306 may further include additional elements not shown in FIG. 3, such as, for example, one or more summation elements for combining two or more filtered outputs in order to generate the individual audio signal an for speaker element n. In some embodiments, the filtered outputs for select speaker elements 302, groups, and/or sub-nests may be combined or summed together to create a desired polar pattern, or to steer a main lobe of the speaker array towards a desired angular direction, or azimuth and elevation, such as, e.g., 30 degrees, 45 degrees, etc. In some embodiments, appropriate filter coefficients or weights may be retrieved from database 316 and applied to the audio signals generated for each sub-nest and/or speaker element 302 to create different polar patterns and/or steer the lobes to a desired direction.


As shown, each individual audio signal an output by the filter system 306 is provided to a respective one of the delay elements 308 before exiting the beamformer 304. Each delay element 308 can be individually associated with a respective one of the speaker elements 302 and can be configured to apply an appropriate amount of time delay (e.g., z−1) to the filtered output an received at its input. In embodiments, the delay value for a given speaker element 302 can be retrieved from the database 316 or programmatically generated (e.g., using software instructions executed by a processor), similar to the filter coefficients and/or weights used for the filter system 306. For example, each speaker element 302 may be assigned a respective amount of delay (or delay value), and such pairings may be stored in the database 316. The exact amount of delay applied in association with each speaker element 302 can vary depending on, for example, a desired polar pattern, a desired steering angle and/or shape of the main lobe, and/or other beamforming aspects.


In some embodiments, the audio processing system 300 also includes one or more microphones 320 for detecting sound in a given environment and converting the sound into an audio signal for the purpose of implementing acoustic echo cancellation (AEC), voice lift, and other audio processing techniques designed to improve the performance of the speaker array 300. In some embodiments, the one or more microphones 320 may be arranged inside the speaker enclosure (such as, e.g., housing 106 of FIG. 1). In other embodiments, the one or more microphones 320 may be physically separate from the speaker array 302, but communicatively coupled to the audio processing system 300 and positioned in the same room or location. The microphone(s) 320 may include any suitable type of microphone element, such as, e.g., a micro-electrical mechanical system (MEMS) transducer, condenser microphone, dynamic transducer, piezoelectric microphone, etc. In some embodiments, the microphone 320 is a standalone microphone array, for example, as shown in FIG. 12 and described below.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary method 400 of generating a beamformed audio output for a speaker array comprising a plurality of speaker elements or drivers arranged in a concentric, nested configuration (e.g., as shown in FIG. 1), in accordance with embodiments. All or portions of the method 400 may be performed by one or more processors and/or other processing devices (e.g., analog to digital converters, encryption chips, etc.) within or external to the speaker array (such as, e.g., speaker array 202 shown in FIG. 2). In addition, one or more other types of components (e.g., memory, input and/or output devices, transmitters, receivers, buffers, drivers, discrete components, logic circuits, etc.) may also be utilized in conjunction with the processors and/or other processing components to perform any, some, or all of the steps of the method 400. For example, program code stored in a memory of the audio processing system 300 shown in FIG. 3 may be executed by the beamformer 304 to carry out one or more operations of the method 400. Each audio output signal generated by the audio processing system 300 may be provided to a respective one of the drivers included in the speaker array (e.g., speaker elements 302 shown in FIG. 3 or drivers 102 shown in FIG. 1). The drivers can be arranged in a plurality of concentric groups positioned at different radial distances to form a nested configuration (e.g., groups 108-114 in FIG. 1).


The method 400 begins at step 402 with receiving one or more input audio signals from an audio source. The input audio signals may be received at one or more processors, such as, e.g., beamformer 304 shown in FIG. 3. In some embodiments, step 402 may include receiving at least two different input audio signals over at least two different channels. In such cases, the method 400 may be configured to simultaneously process or beamform the at least two signals and generate at least two audio outputs directed to at least two different locations or listeners using the same speaker array. For example, certain steps of the method 400 may be performed multiple times, in parallel, in order to generate the two or more outputs. In other embodiments, step 402 may include combining input audio signals received over different channels to create one input audio signal for the beamformer 304.


At step 404, the one or more processors generate a separate audio output signal for each driver included in the speaker array based on at least one of the one or more input audio signals, as well as a desired beamforming result and characteristics related to the driver's position in the speaker array, including, for example, the particular group in which the driver located. The audio output may be generated using crossover filtering, delay and sum processing, weigh and sum processing, and/or other beamforming techniques for manipulating magnitude, phase, and delay values for each individual driver in order to steer the main lobe towards a desired location or listener and maintain a constant beam width across a wide range of frequencies. In embodiments, generating an audio output signal for each driver at step 404 can include obtaining one or more filter values and at least one delay value associated with the driver. At least one of the one or more filter values may be assigned to the driver based on the concentric group in which the driver is located. For example, in some embodiments, the groups of drivers may be combined to form two or more sub-nests for audio processing purposes, and all drivers belonging to a particular sub-nest can be assigned at least one common filter value. On the other hand, the time delay value may be specific to each driver. The filter values and delay values may be retrieved from a database (e.g., database 316 in FIG. 3) or generated by the one or more processors, as described herein.


The generating process at step 404 can also include applying the at least one filter value to one or more filters (e.g., filter bank 306 in FIG. 3) to produce a filtered output signal for the respective driver, providing the filtered output signal to a delay element (e.g., delay element 308 in FIG. 3) associated with the driver, and applying the at least one delay value to the delay element to produce a delayed output signal for that driver. In some embodiments, the generating step can further include providing the delayed output signal to a power amplifier (e.g., amplifier 310 in FIG. 3) in order to amplify the signal by a predetermined gain amount. In some cases, the predetermined gain amount may be selected based on the driver coupled to the amplifier. In other cases, the gain amount can be determined or set by the processer during step 404 in order to ensure uniform outputs across all speaker elements.


Step 406 involves providing the generated audio output signals to the corresponding drivers of the speaker array in order to produce a beamformed audio output. In embodiments, the audio output signals are transmitted to the speaker array over a single cable configured to transport audio, data, and power. The method 400 may end after completion of step 406.



FIG. 5 is a diagram 500 of exemplary anechoic frequency responses of the full speaker array 100 shown in FIG. 1, measured at a distance of two meters from the speaker array in accordance with embodiments. A first response plot 502 corresponds to the frequency response of the full speaker array 100 from a broadside direction, or without any lobe steering. As shown, the response plot 502 is substantially flat for most of the voice frequency range (e.g., 300 Hz to 3.4 kHz), with the frequency response dropping off at very low frequencies (e.g., a 3 decibel (dB) down point around 400 Hz) and very high frequencies (e.g., above 7000 Hz). A second response plot 504 corresponds to the frequency response of the full speaker array 100 when the main lobe is steered thirty degrees to the right relative to a plane of the array, and still at a distance of 2 meters. As shown, the second response plot 504 is substantially consistent with or similar to the first response plot 502. That is, like plot 502, the second response plot 504 is substantially flat for most of the voice frequency range, except for drop offs at the same very low and very high frequencies. Thus, FIG. 5 illustrates that the speaker array 100 is capable of maintaining a constant frequency response across a wide range of frequencies even after steering.



FIGS. 6A and 6B and FIGS. 7A and 7B are diagrams of exemplary polar responses of the speaker array 100 shown in FIG. 1, measured at a distance of two meters from the speaker array, in accordance with embodiments. Each polar response or pattern represents the directionality of the speaker array 100 for a given frequency at different angles about a central axis of the array. As will be appreciated, while the polar plots in FIGS. 6-7 show the polar responses of a single lobe at selected frequencies, the speaker array 100 is capable of creating multiple simultaneous lobes in multiple directions, each with equivalent, or at least substantially similar, polar response.


Polar plots 700-714 shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B provide the polar responses of the speaker array 100 from a broadside direction at frequencies of 350 Hz, 950 Hz, 1250 Hz, 2000 Hz, 3000 Hz, 4000 Hz, 6000 Hz, and 7000 Hz, respectively. Polar plots 700-714 shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B provide the polar responses of the speaker array 100 when steered thirty degrees to the right relative to a plane of the array 100, for the same set of frequencies, respectively. As demonstrated by the polar patterns in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the speaker array 100 can form a main lobe, or directional sound beam, with minimal side lobes at each of the indicated frequencies, when broadside or without any steering. And as demonstrated by the polar patterns in FIGS. 7A and 7B, when steered 30 degrees to the right, the speaker array 100 still forms a main lobe with minimal side lobes at each of the indicated frequencies. Thus, FIGS. 6-7 show that the speaker array 100 is capable of being steered at least 30 degrees to the right without sacrificing the main to side lobe ratio across a wide range of frequencies.



FIGS. 6-7 also show that the speaker array 100 exhibits higher directivity, or narrower beam widths, at higher frequencies, for example, as shown by polar plots 612 and 614 representing 6000 and 7000 Hz, respectively, and somewhat lower directivity at the lower frequencies, with the lowest frequency, 350 Hz, having the largest beam width, as shown by polar plots 600 and 700. Still, FIGS. 6-7 show that the side lobes are formed at no more than 12 decibels (dB) below the main lobe. Thus, the speaker array 100 provides a high overall directivity index across the voice frequency range with a high level of side lobe rejection and an optimal main-to-side-lobe ratio (e.g., 12 dB) over a prescribed steering angle range.



FIGS. 8-10 illustrate various exemplary applications or use cases of the speaker array 100 shown in FIG. 1 being used to dynamically steer localized sound and create spatialized audio, in accordance with embodiments. In each example, the speaker array 100 is configured to generate multiple lobes (or localized sound beams) with specific sizes, shapes, and/or steering directions based on audio output signals received from, for example, beamforming system 204 shown in FIG. 2. The beamforming system 204 may generate the audio output signal(s) by applying beamforming techniques to one or more input audio signals, as described herein. For example, the beamforming techniques can be configured to manipulate magnitude, phase, and/or delay characteristics of the input audio signal(s) to dynamically direct or steer each sound beam towards a specific location. The beamforming techniques can also be configured to apply a shaping function (e.g., using magnitude shading) for stretching the beam along a selected axis.


More specifically, FIG. 8 depicts an exemplary environment 800 in which the speaker array 100 is disposed above a table 802 having a number of human listeners (not shown) situated around or adjacent to the table 802. The environment 800 also includes an open microphone 804 positioned at one end of the table 802 to implement acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) and/or voice lift applications. In the illustrated example, the speaker array 100 has been configured to direct audio outputs, demonstrated by lobes 806, 808, and 810, towards three discrete listeners or locations positioned adjacent to each other along one side of the table 802, while also steering the lobes 806, 808, 810 away from the open microphone 804 to improve AEC functionality. In the case of voice-lift applications, for example, in a conferencing environment, the microphone 804 may be used to capture sound produced by one or more human speakers positioned adjacent to or near the microphone 804, and the steerable lobes of the speaker array 100 may be used to direct the captured sound towards listeners that are outside of an audible range of the human speaker(s) and/or are further away from the microphone 804.



FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary environment 900 in which the speaker array 100 is disposed in an oddly or irregularly shaped room 902. In such cases, the speaker array 100 can be configured to direct multiple sound beams or lobes towards the various segments or corners of the room 902 so as to minimize room reflections. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, a first set of lobes 904 may be generally directed towards a first irregularly shaped segment or alcove of the room 902, but the lobes 904 themselves may be steered away from each other to minimize reflections. This lobe configuration may be repeated for each segment of the room 902, so that each lobe 904 is steered away from the other lobes 904 and towards a unique or different direction, as shown in FIG. 9.



FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary environment 1000 in which the speaker array 100 is configured to produce various lobe shapes to accommodate different scenarios. In the illustrated example, lobe 1002 has a rounded, nearly circular shape that provides a wider beam, while lobes 1004 and 1006 have elongated, oval shapes that provide a narrower, more directed beam. Other shapes are also contemplated. Lobe shaping may be managed using magnitude shading and/or other beamforming techniques, including, for example, through selection of appropriate filter weights for the filter system 306 shown in FIG. 3 and appropriate delay coefficients for the delay elements 308, also shown in FIG. 3.



FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary audio system 1100 (or “eco-system”) comprising one or more planar speaker arrays 1102, a beamforming system 1104, and at least one microphone 1120, in accordance with embodiments. The audio system 1100 can be configured to output audio signals received from an audio source 1124 in one or more narrow, directed beams that are dynamically steerable and highly spatially controlled, similar to the steerable speaker system 200 shown in FIG. 2 and described herein. Through the use of microphone(s) 1120 and appropriate audio processing techniques, the audio system 1100 can also provide improved audio performance, such as, for example, crosstalk minimization and acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) through higher source receiver isolation, spatialized audio streams, and voice-lift applications. In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 can be configured to simultaneously output multiple streams corresponding to different audio source materials (e.g., multi-lingual content steams) to multiple locations or listeners. The audio system 1100 may be used in open office environments, conference rooms, museums, performance stages, airports, and other large-scale environments with multiple potential listeners.


Each speaker array 1102 can include a plurality of speaker elements or drivers arranged in a planar configuration. For example, the speaker elements may be arranged in a harmonically nested, concentric configuration (e.g., as shown in FIG. 1) or other geometrically optimized configuration in accordance with the techniques described herein. In embodiments, each planar speaker array 1102 may be substantially similar to the steerable speaker array 202, as shown in FIG. 2 and described herein, and/or the microphone array 100, as shown in FIG. 1 and described herein.


The beamforming system 1104 can be in communication with the individual speaker elements of each speaker array 1102 and can be configured to beamform or otherwise process input audio signals and generate a corresponding audio output signal for each speaker element of each speaker array 1102. In this manner, the speaker array(s) 1102 can be configured to simultaneously produce a plurality of individual audio outputs using various speaker elements, or combinations of speaker elements, and direct each audio output towards a designated location or listener. In embodiments, the beamforming system 1104 may be substantially similar to the beamforming system 204, as shown in FIG. 2 and described herein, and may include an audio processing system that is substantially similar to the audio processing system 300, as shown in FIG. 3 and described herein.


As shown in FIG. 11, the audio system 1100 may include any number of speaker arrays 1102, and each speaker array 1102 may be coupled to the beamforming system 1104 via a single cable 1106. The cable 1106 can be configured to transport one or more of data signals, audio signals, and power between the beamforming system 1104 and the speaker array 1102 coupled thereto, with a preferred embodiment transporting all three (i.e. data (or control), audio, and power). In embodiments, each single cable 1106 can be substantially similar to the cable 206, as shown in FIG. 2 and described herein. For example, like the cable 206, the cables 1106 may be Ethernet cables (e.g., CATS, CAT6, etc.) configured to be electrically coupled to respective Ethernet ports included in each of the speaker arrays 1102 and in the beamforming system 1104. In such cases, the power signal may be delivered through the cables 1106 using Power over Ethernet (PoE) technology, as described herein. Other types of cables and corresponding external ports are also contemplated, as also described herein. The power source supplying the power signal may be housed in the beamforming system 1104 (e.g., as shown in FIG. 2) or may be coupled to the beamforming system 1104 to provide power thereto.


The microphone 1120 can include any suitable type of microphone transducer or element capable of detecting sound in a given environment and converting the sound into an audio signal for implementing acoustic echo cancellation (AEC), voice lift, crosstalk minimization, dynamic lobe steering, and other audio processing techniques designed to improve performance of the speaker array(s) 1102. In embodiments, the microphone 1120 can be substantially similar to the microphone 320 shown in FIG. 3. The microphone 1120 can be communicatively coupled to the beamforming system 1104 using a single cable 1122 that is similar to the single cable 1106. For example, the cable 1122 may be configured to transport power, data signals, and/or audio signals between the beamforming system 1104 and the microphone array 1120. The audio signal output generated by the microphone 1120 may be digital or analog. If analog, the microphone 1120 may include one or more components, such as, e.g., analog to digital converters, processors, etc., for processing the analog audio signals and converting them into digital audio signals. The digital audio signals may conform to the Dante standard for transmitting audio over Ethernet, for example, or other network standard.


As shown in FIG. 11, the microphone 1120 can be a standalone microphone array. According to embodiments, the microphone array 1120 can include a plurality of microphone elements arranged in a planar configuration. In a preferred embodiment, the microphone elements of the microphone array 1120 are MEMS (micro-electrical mechanical system) transducers, though other types of microphone transducers are also contemplated. The beamforming system 1104 can be configured to combine the audio signals captured by each of the microphone elements in the microphone array 1120 and generate an audio output signal for the microphone array 1120 with a desired directional polar pattern. In some embodiments, the beamforming system 1104 can be configured to steer the output of the microphone array 1120 towards a desired angle or location, similar to the speaker array 1102. Non-limiting examples of beamforming or audio processing techniques that can be used to steer or direct the output of the microphone array in a desired direction may be found in, for example, the following commonly-owned U.S. patent applications: U.S. Patent Application No. 62/855,187, entitled “Auto Focus, Auto Focus within Regions, and Auto Placement of Beamformed Microphone Lobes;” U.S. Patent Application No. 62/821,800, entitled “Auto Focus and Placement of Beamformed Microphone Lobes;” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/409,239, entitled “Pattern-Forming Microphone Array,” the entire contents of each being incorporated by reference herein.


In embodiments, the audio system 1100 can be configured to provide adaptive or dynamic steering control for each speaker array 1102 and each microphone array 1120. For example, the steerable speaker array 1102 may be capable of individually steering each audio output or beam towards a desired location. Likewise, the microphone array 1120 may be capable of individually steering each audio pick-up lobe or beam towards a desired target. The adaptive steering control may be achieved using appropriate beamforming techniques performed by the beamforming system 1104 for each of the microphones and speakers.


In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 can be configured to apply the dynamic steering capabilities of the at least one microphone 1120 and one or more speaker arrays 1102 towards functionalities or aspects that are in addition to delivering audio outputs to specific listeners, or configured to enhance the same. In particular, the audio system 1100 may be configured to allow each component of the system 1100 (e.g., each microphone and speaker) to be mutually aware of the physical location and steering status of all other components in the system 1100 relative to each other. This mutual awareness, as well as other information related to the human source/receivers in the room, allow the audio system 1100 to make active decisions related to steering locations, as well as magnitude variability and signal delay, which allows for source reinforcement and coherence, for example. Additional details and examples are provided below.


Room Response


In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 may be used to determine room behavior, or measure the room impulse response, by using the microphone array 1120 to calculate an impulse response for the speaker arrays 1102. Appropriate audio processing techniques may be used to measure the impulse response of each speaker array 1102 and may include a frequency-dependent response or an audible response. According to some techniques, an adaptive filter may be assigned to each speaker array 1102, and the filtered outputs may be combined to obtain the overall room response.


As an example, the microphone array 1120 of the audio system 1100 may be used to calculate specific room characteristics, namely RT60, speaker to microphone transfer function, and impulse response. In some embodiments, each of these values may be determined using well-known techniques. The ability to automatically measure these metrics and use them to condition the response of both the microphone array 1120 and the speaker arrays 1102, as well as the accompanying additional functionalities outlined herein, can provide information about the room or environment, and the audio system's interaction with that environment, that may better inform the technologies described below.


Time of Flight


In some embodiments, the microphone array 1120 of the audio system 1100 may be used to calculate each speaker array's time of flight (TOF), or the time it takes audio output by a given speaker array 1102 to propagate through air over a known distance (e.g., the distance between the speaker array 1102 and the microphone array 1120). The time of flight calculations can be used to control gain parameters for the speaker arrays 1102, for example, in order to avoid feedback. As an example, this measurement can be made by sending a predetermined test signal to the speaker array 1102 using any synchronous digital communication technique, while simultaneously initiating detection of the test signal audio at the microphone array 1120 also under test, using any synchronous digital communication technique (such as, for example, but not limited to, Dante). Once the signal is detected, an appropriately processed time difference between when the speaker array 1102 issued the signal and when it was detected by the microphone array 1120 will indicate the time of flight and thus, can be used to calculate the actual distance separating the two devices.


AEC


In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 may be used to optimize acoustic echo cancellation and minimize crosstalk by taking advantage of the fact that the microphone array 1120 and the speaker arrays 1102 are aware of each other. For example, an appropriate test signal may be applied to a given speaker array 1102 to excite the acoustic response of the room. The audio system 1100 can use the response detected from said test signal to initially tune echo cancelation algorithms for one or more microphones to minimize echoes generated by the room in response to the speaker array output. The audio system 1100 can also use the detected information to tune a response of the microphone array 1120 to minimize pickup from the spatial coordinates of the speaker array 1102 relative to the microphone array 1120.


Voice-Lift


In some embodiments, the steerable microphone array 1120 and steerable speaker array 1102 of the audio system 1100 may be used for adaptive voice-lift optimization. For example, null-steering techniques may be used to mutually exclude the output of one speaker array 1102 from that of another speaker array 1102. Also, null generation techniques may be used to mask non-speech audio detected by the microphone array 1120.


Voice lift is a technique for increasing speech intelligibility in large meeting rooms through subtle audio reinforcement. Incorporating voice lift techniques into the beamforming microphone array 1120 and speaker arrays 1102 of the audio system 1100 can provide a number of benefits. For example, the gain before feedback can be optimized by including the position of the active microphone in the steering decisions being made by the active speakers. When the system 1100 is aware of where the sound is coming from (i.e. the location of the talker or other audio source), the rest of the system 1100 can react intelligently by reinforcing the areas that far from the audio source, while limiting reinforcement near the audio source. As another example, when the speakers and microphones are aware of each other (e.g., via time of flight), intelligent delays can be applied to the speaker outputs relative to the audio source for voice lift purposes, so as to synchronize the direct transmission with the reinforced transmission. This would limit the amount of phase or time of flight errors in the reinforcement, which leads to a more natural and transparent experience.


Localization


In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 may also be used for acoustic localization of multiple audio sources. For example, as people speak, their locations may change, thus requiring the audio system 1100 to redirect speaker audio to optimize system performance. The presence of a set of microphones with known inter-microphone distances allows for the calculation of talker location estimation relative to the microphones. Using that information and its knowledge of the location of the microphone array 1120 relative to the speaker array 1102, the audio system 1100 can simultaneously optimize speaker playback and microphone pickup directions. In some cases, the audio system 1100 may further include one or more technologies for tracking audio sources as they move about the room or environment, such as, for example, one or more infrared devices, a camera, and/or thermal imaging technology.


Wall Mapping


Another exemplary use for the audio system 1100 may be wall mapping to determine an audio envelope of the room or other environment and generate spatial awareness of the audio sources therein. For example, the audio system 1100 may determine intra-system awareness (e.g., where the speaker arrays 1102 are located in the room) by using the microphone array 1120 to calculate time of arrival (TOA), distance between two points, and other information pertinent to establishing the spatial relationship between a given pair of speaker arrays 1102. The audio system 1100 may combine the wall mapping knowledge with this intra-system awareness to automatically control certain parameters or features of the speaker arrays 1102. For example, the audio system 1100 may use the information to automatically adjust gain parameters, lobe characteristics, and/or other features of the speaker arrays 1102 in order to avoid feedback and other undesirable effects.


In some embodiments, wall mapping can be performed by issuing a pulse to a single speaker array 1102 and processing the response by a set of microphones of known geometry, such as, e.g., microphone array 1120. Room reflections can be estimated, and in most cases, a basic room geometry can be estimated based thereon. Knowing the room geometry allows the audio system 1100 to accommodate an estimated room response. The inter-system awareness can be accomplished via any digital communication technique, whether wired or wireless (such as, e.g., Dante). Alternatively, audio steganography may be used to embed the information in an audio signal output by the speaker array 1102 and received by a given microphone, or inserted into the audio signal detected by a given microphone. Additionally, AES3 digital audio signal technology or ultrasound technology may be used to perform the information exchange between a given pair of microphones.


Privacy Index


When used in an open-office environment, or other large, open area, the audio system 1100 may be used to increase or improve a privacy index of the individuals in the environment 1200 through dynamic noise-masking. For example, a person occupying one cubicle may be able to mask a private conversation from the occupants of surrounding cubicles by configuring the speaker array 1102 to direct frequency-tuned noise towards each of the other occupants (e.g., as an individual audio output steered towards each occupant).


Privacy index (PI) is outlined as part of ASTM E1130 and is determined by the ability of nearby listeners to discern and intelligibly understand the content of a conversation. An alternate metric that is used in the architectural acoustics community is Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) outlined in ANSI S3.5. According to some embodiments, the audio system 1100 may have the following capabilities in an open office environment. The speaker array 1102 may be capable of directing masking noise to areas of the environment that are not being used for a given teleconference. This masking noise can hinder the intelligibility of the teleconference audio or speech for outside listeners. Such functionality may be initiated as part of each teleconference, or may be a persistent feature of a well-defined area, wherein the audio system 1100 is configured to ensure minimal interference to that area from talkers detected in other areas, or limit transmission of audio from those other areas to the well-defined area. The dynamic steering ability of the microphone array 1120 and speaker arrays 1102 may also be used to actively mask surrounding sounds that are naturally transmitted to a given area, for example, using active noise suppression technique.


Wireless Signals


In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 can be configured to share information between its components using ultrasonic or steganographic-type techniques that embed data or control information within the wireless audio signal. For example, information about gain levels, equalization levels, talker identification, filter coefficients, system level warnings (e.g., low battery), and other functional tasks or tests could be conveyed between components of the audio system 1100 using such wireless techniques, instead of using the network, as is conventional. This may reduce bandwidth consumption on the network and increase the speed with which information can be conveyed. Also, by embedding the data into the audio signal, the audio signal can be sent in real-time. That is, the audio signal need not be delayed to accommodate data signals, as is conventional.



FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary implementation of the audio system 1100 as a distributed system in an environment 1200. The environment 1200 may be a conference room, a meeting hall, an open-office environment, or other large space with a ceiling 1230. As shown, the audio system 1100 may include multiple speaker arrays 1102 and at least one microphone array 1120 positioned at various locations throughout the environment 1200 in order to provide appropriate coverage and audio performance. Though FIG. 12 shows two speaker arrays 1102 and one microphone array 1120, it should be appreciated that additional speaker arrays and/or additional microphone arrays may be included in the audio system 1100, for example, to cover a larger listening area.


In some embodiments, the speaker arrays 1102 may be distributed around the environment 1200 so that each speaker array 1102 covers a predetermined portion of the environment 1200. In addition, the placement of each speaker 1102 and microphone 1120 may be selected relative to each other, or so that there is sufficient distance between adjoining devices. In some cases, the microphone 1120 may be directed away from the speaker arrays 1102 to avoid unwanted acoustic interference. The locations of the speaker arrays 1102 and microphone array(s) 1120 may also be selected depending on expected positioning of the listeners in the environment 1200 and/or the type of environment 1200. For example, in a conference room, the speaker arrays 1102 may be centered above a large conference table and may be used during a conference call to reproduce an audio signal representing speech or spoken words received from a remote audio source associated with the conference call. As another example, in an open office environment, the speaker arrays 1102 may be positioned above the clusters of cubicles, so that each cubicle receives audio from at least one of the speaker arrays 1102.


In some embodiments, the speaker arrays 1102 and the microphone array 1120 can be configured for attachment to a vertical wall or horizontal surface, such as, e.g., a table-top. In other embodiments, the speaker arrays 1102 and microphone array 1120 can be configured for attachment to the ceiling 1230, with a front face of each device facing down towards the environment 1200. For example, each speaker array 1102 and/or microphone array 1120 may include a housing with a back surface that is configured for flush-mount attachment to the ceiling 1230, similar to the housing 106 shown in FIG. 1 and described herein.


In some embodiments, the ceiling 1230 can be a suspended ceiling, or drop-ceiling, comprising a plurality of ceiling tiles arranged in a grid-like fashion, as shown in FIG. 12. In such cases, the speaker arrays 1102 and the microphone array(s) 1120 can be configured (e.g., sized and shaped) for attachment to the drop-ceiling 1230, either in place of a given ceiling tile or to the ceiling tile itself. For example, a size and shape of a housing for each speaker array 1102 and microphone array 1120 may be selected to substantially match the size and shape of a standard ceiling tile (e.g., 60 cm by 60 cm, or 24 in by 24 in), and such housings may be configured for attachment to a frame of the drop-ceiling 1230 in the place of a standard ceiling tile. A non-limiting example of a ceiling array microphone may be found in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 9,565,493, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.


Wireless/Distributed System


As shown in FIG. 11, the components of the audio system 1100 may be coupled to the beamforming system 1104 via one or more cables 1106 or 1122. In some embodiments, the audio system 1100 may be configured as a distributed system. For example, the microphone array 1120 and speaker arrays 1102 may be in wireless communication with the beamforming system 1104, for example, using a Near Field Communication (NFC) network, or other types of wireless technology (e.g., conductive, inductive, magnetic, etc.). In such cases, power may still be delivered over the cables 1106 and 1122, but audio and/or data signals may be delivered wirelessly from one device to the other using any suitable communication protocol.


In embodiments, the ability to wirelessly link the components of the audio system 1100 through a distributed network that enables metadata transfer among said components, allows for full transparency of the audio, DSP, and control parameters that are developed and exchanged through the use of the audio system 1100. Moreover, the ability to manage this metadata sharing through protocols, such as, for example, DECT, encrypted Wi-Fi, RF, NFC, Bluetooth, or any number of other wireless or wired protocols, allows for each piece of the system 1100 to be equally aware of the system 1100 as a whole. This awareness, in turn, allows the individual system components to behave in a system-wide consistent manner, as each component uses the same dataset for decision-making purposes.


Any process descriptions or blocks in figures should be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process, and alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments of the invention in which functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art.


This disclosure is intended to explain how to fashion and use various embodiments in accordance with the technology rather than to limit the true, intended, and fair scope and spirit thereof. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to the precise forms disclosed. Modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments) were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principle of the described technology and its practical application, and to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the technology in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the embodiments as determined by the appended claims, as may be amended during the pendency of this application for patent, and all equivalents thereof, when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled.

Claims
  • 1. A speaker array comprising: a plurality of drivers arranged in a concentric, nested configuration formed by arranging the drivers in a plurality of concentric groups and placing the groups at different radial distances from a central point of the configuration, each group being formed by a subset of the plurality of drivers being positioned at predetermined intervals from each other along a perimeter of the group, wherein the concentric groups are rotationally offset from each other relative to a central axis of the array that passes through the central point, and wherein the different radial distances are configured such that the concentric groups are harmonically nested,wherein the plurality of drivers are configured to receive corresponding audio output signals for producing a beamformed audio output, the audio output signal corresponding to each driver being generated by applying cross-over filtering to an input audio signal using one or more filter values, the one or more filter values being assigned to that driver based on the concentric group in which the driver is located.
  • 2. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein each group of drivers is rotationally offset relative to the central axis by a different number of degrees.
  • 3. The speaker array of claim 1, further comprising at least one driver arranged at the central point of the concentric, nested configuration.
  • 4. The speaker array of claim 3, wherein the at least one driver and the drivers situated in the two groups that are closest to the central point form a cluster configured to operate in low frequency bands.
  • 5. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein each group forms a circular shape with a diameter that is selected based on a desired operating frequency for the drivers included in that group.
  • 6. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein each group comprises a predetermined number of drivers, the predetermined number being selected from a group consisting of an odd number and multiples of the odd number.
  • 7. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein the plurality of drivers includes at least 48 drivers.
  • 8. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein the number of concentric groups is at least three.
  • 9. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of drivers has a uniform aperture size.
  • 10. The speaker array of claim 1, wherein each driver has an enclosed volume extending away from a front face of the driver and forming a cylindrical cavity behind the driver, a height of the cylindrical cavity determining a depth of the speaker array.
  • 11. A method performed by one or more processors to generate a beamformed audio output using an audio system comprising a speaker array having a plurality of drivers, the method comprising: receiving one or more input audio signals from an audio source coupled to the audio system;generating a separate audio output signal for each driver of the speaker array based on at least one of the input audio signals, the drivers being arranged in a plurality of concentric groups positioned at different radial distances relative to a central point to form a concentric, nested configuration,the generating comprising, for each driver: obtaining one or more filter values and at least one delay value associated with the driver, at least one of the one or more filter values being assigned to the driver based on the concentric group in which the driver is located,applying the at least one filter value to one or more filters;applying cross-over filtering to the at least one of the input audio signals using the one or more filters to produce a filtered output signal for the driver,providing the filtered output signal to a delay element associated with the driver,applying the at least one delay value to the delay element to produce a delayed output signal for the driver, andproviding the delayed output signal to a power amplifier in order to amplify the signal by a predetermined gain amount; andproviding the audio output signals to the corresponding drivers to produce a beamformed audio output.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving one or more microphone signals captured by at least one microphone included in the audio system, and optimizing an acoustic echo cancellation parameter of the speaker array based on the one or more microphone signals.
  • 13. An audio system, comprising: a first speaker array comprising a plurality of drivers arranged in a plurality of concentric groups positioned at different radial distances from a central point to form a concentric, nested configuration, each group being formed by a subset of the plurality of drivers being positioned at predetermined intervals from each other along a perimeter of the group; anda beamforming system coupled to the first speaker array and configured to: receive one or more input audio signals from an audio source,generate a separate audio output signal for each driver of the first speaker array based on at least one of the input audio signals, andprovide the audio output signals to the corresponding drivers to produce a beamformed audio output,wherein the beamforming system comprises a filter system including one or more filters, the beamforming system using the filter system to generate separate audio output signals, andwherein for each driver, the filter system is configured to apply cross-over filtering to the at least one of the input audio signals using one or more filter values, and generate a separate filtered audio output signal for said driver, the one or more filter values being assigned to that driver based on the concentric group in which the driver is located.
  • 14. The audio system of claim 13, further comprising: a first single cable coupling the first speaker array to the beamforming system, and configured to transport audio, data, and power.
  • 15. The audio system of claim 13, further comprising at least one microphone coupled to the beamforming system, wherein the beamforming system is configured to generate the separate audio output signal for each driver based further on one or more microphone signals captured by the at least one microphone.
  • 16. The audio system of claim 15, wherein the beamforming system is configured to use the one or more microphone signals to optimize an acoustic echo cancellation parameter of the speaker array.
  • 17. The audio system of claim 15, wherein the at least one microphone is a standalone microphone array comprising a plurality of microphones arranged in a planar configuration.
  • 18. The audio system of claim 17, further comprising a second single cable coupling the microphone array to the beamforming system, and configured to transport audio, data, and power.
  • 19. The audio system of claim 13, further comprising a second speaker array coupled to the beamforming system, the second speaker array comprising a second plurality of drivers arranged in a second plurality of concentric groups positioned at different radial distances from a central point to form a second concentric, nested configuration, wherein the beamforming system is further configured to: generate a separate audio output signal for each driver of the second speaker array based on at least one of the input audio signals received from the audio source, andprovide said audio output signals to the corresponding drivers of the second speaker array to produce a second beamformed audio output.
  • 20. The audio system of claim 19, further comprising a third single cable coupling the second speaker array to the beamforming system, and configured to transport audio, data, and power.
  • 21. The audio system of claim 13, wherein the beamforming system further comprises a plurality of delay elements, the beamforming system being configured to generate the separate audio output signals using said delay elements.
  • 22. The audio system of claim 21, wherein each delay element is associated with a respective one of the drivers in the first speaker array, each driver is assigned a respective amount of delay, and the delay element associated with each driver is configured to receive the corresponding filtered output signal from the filter system and add the respective amount of delay to said filtered output signal to produce a delayed output signal for the driver.
  • 23. The audio system of claim 22, wherein the beamforming system further comprises a plurality of power amplifiers, each amplifier coupled to a respective one of delay elements and to the driver associated with said delay element, wherein each amplifier is configured to apply a respective gain amount to the delayed output signal received from the corresponding delay element.
  • 24. A speaker system, comprising: a planar speaker array disposed in a substantially flat housing and comprising a plurality of drivers arranged in a two-dimensional configuration, the speaker array having an aperture size of less than 60 centimeters and being configured to simultaneously form a plurality of dynamically steerable lobes directed towards multiple locations; anda beamforming system coupled to the speaker array and configured to digitally process one or more input audio signals, generate a corresponding audio output signal for each driver, and direct each output signal towards a designated one of the multiple locations,wherein the plurality of drivers are arranged in the two-dimensional configuration by arranging the drivers in a plurality of concentric groups and placing the groups at a different radial distances from a central point of the configuration, andwherein the beamforming system comprises a filter system including one or more filters, the beamforming system being configured to generate the corresponding audio output signal for each driver using the filter system, and the filter system being configured to apply cross-over filtering to the one or more input audio signals using one or more filter values, the one or more filter values being assigned to that driver based on the concentric group in which the driver is located.
  • 25. The speaker system of claim 24, wherein the beamforming system further comprises a plurality of delay elements, the beamforming system being configured to generate the corresponding audio output signal for each driver using said delay elements.
  • 26. The speaker system of claim 24, further comprising a single cable coupling the speaker array to the beamforming system, the cable configured to transport audio, data, and power.
  • 27. The speaker system of claim 24, wherein the plurality of drivers includes at least 48 drivers.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/960,502, filed on Jan. 13, 2020, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/851,819, filed on May 23, 2019, both of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (977)
Number Name Date Kind
1535408 Fricke Apr 1925 A
1540788 Mcclure Jun 1925 A
1965830 Hammer Jul 1934 A
2075588 Meyers Mar 1937 A
2113219 Olson Apr 1938 A
2164655 Kleerup Jul 1939 A
D122771 Doner Oct 1940 S
2233412 Hill Mar 1941 A
2268529 Stiles Dec 1941 A
2343037 William Feb 1944 A
2377449 Prevette Jun 1945 A
2481250 Schneider Sep 1949 A
2521603 Prew Sep 1950 A
2533565 Eichelman Dec 1950 A
2539671 Olson Jan 1951 A
2777232 Kulicke Jan 1957 A
2828508 Labarre Apr 1958 A
2840181 Wildman Jun 1958 A
2882633 Howell Apr 1959 A
2912605 Tibbetts Nov 1959 A
2938113 Schnell May 1960 A
2950556 Larios Aug 1960 A
3019854 OBryant Feb 1962 A
3132713 Seeler May 1964 A
3143182 Sears Aug 1964 A
3160225 Sechrist Dec 1964 A
3161975 McMillan Dec 1964 A
3205601 Gawne Sep 1965 A
3239973 Hannes Mar 1966 A
3240883 Seeler Mar 1966 A
3310901 Sarkisian Mar 1967 A
3321170 Vye May 1967 A
3509290 Mochida Apr 1970 A
3573399 Schroeder Apr 1971 A
3657490 Scheiber Apr 1972 A
3696885 Grieg Oct 1972 A
3755625 Maston Aug 1973 A
3828508 Moeller Aug 1974 A
3857191 Sadorus Dec 1974 A
3895194 Fraim Jul 1975 A
3906431 Clearwaters Sep 1975 A
D237103 Fisher Oct 1975 S
3936606 Wanke Feb 1976 A
3938617 Forbes Feb 1976 A
3941638 Horky Mar 1976 A
3992584 Dugan Nov 1976 A
4007461 Luedtke Feb 1977 A
4008408 Kodama Feb 1977 A
4029170 Phillips Jun 1977 A
4032725 McGee Jun 1977 A
4070547 Dellar Jan 1978 A
4072821 Bauer Feb 1978 A
4096353 Bauer Jun 1978 A
4127156 Brandt Nov 1978 A
4131760 Christensen Dec 1978 A
4169219 Beard Sep 1979 A
4184048 Alcaide Jan 1980 A
4198705 Massa Apr 1980 A
D255234 Wellward Jun 1980 S
D256015 Doherty Jul 1980 S
4212133 Lufkin Jul 1980 A
4237339 Bunting Dec 1980 A
4244096 Kashichi Jan 1981 A
4244906 Heinemann Jan 1981 A
4254417 Speiser Mar 1981 A
4275694 Nagaishi Jun 1981 A
4296280 Richie Oct 1981 A
4305141 Massa Dec 1981 A
4308425 Momose Dec 1981 A
4311874 Wallace, Jr. Jan 1982 A
4330691 Gordon May 1982 A
4334740 Wray Jun 1982 A
4365449 Liautaud Dec 1982 A
4373191 Fette Feb 1983 A
4393631 Krent Jul 1983 A
4414433 Horie Nov 1983 A
4429850 Weber Feb 1984 A
4436966 Botros Mar 1984 A
4449238 Lee May 1984 A
4466117 Rudolf Aug 1984 A
4485484 Flanagan Nov 1984 A
4489442 Anderson Dec 1984 A
4518826 Caudill May 1985 A
4521908 Miyaji Jun 1985 A
4566557 Lemaitre Jan 1986 A
4593404 Bolin Jun 1986 A
4594478 Gumb Jun 1986 A
D285067 Delbuck Aug 1986 S
4625827 Bartlett Dec 1986 A
4653102 Hansen Mar 1987 A
4658425 Julstrom Apr 1987 A
4669108 Deinzer May 1987 A
4675906 Sessler Jun 1987 A
4693174 Anderson Sep 1987 A
4696043 Iwahara Sep 1987 A
4712231 Julstrom Dec 1987 A
4741038 Elko Apr 1988 A
4752961 Kahn Jun 1988 A
4805730 O'Neill Feb 1989 A
4815132 Minami Mar 1989 A
4860366 Fukushi Aug 1989 A
4862507 Woodard Aug 1989 A
4866868 Kass Sep 1989 A
4881135 Heilweil Nov 1989 A
4888807 Reichel Dec 1989 A
4903247 Van Gerwen Feb 1990 A
4923032 Nuernberger May 1990 A
4928312 Hill May 1990 A
4969197 Takaya Nov 1990 A
5000286 Crawford Mar 1991 A
5038935 Wenkman Aug 1991 A
5058170 Kanamori Oct 1991 A
5088574 Kertesz, III Feb 1992 A
D324780 Sebesta Mar 1992 S
5121426 Baumhauer Jun 1992 A
D329239 Hahn Sep 1992 S
5189701 Jain Feb 1993 A
5204907 Staple Apr 1993 A
5214709 Ribic May 1993 A
D340718 Leger Oct 1993 S
5289544 Franklin Feb 1994 A
D345346 Alfonso Mar 1994 S
D345379 Chan Mar 1994 S
5297210 Julstrom Mar 1994 A
5322979 Cassity Jun 1994 A
5323459 Hirano Jun 1994 A
5329593 Lazzeroni Jul 1994 A
5335011 Addeo Aug 1994 A
5353279 Koyama Oct 1994 A
5359374 Schwartz Oct 1994 A
5371789 Hirano Dec 1994 A
5383293 Royal Jan 1995 A
5384843 Masuda Jan 1995 A
5396554 Hirano Mar 1995 A
5400413 Kindel Mar 1995 A
D363045 Phillips Oct 1995 S
5473701 Cezanne Dec 1995 A
5509634 Gebka Apr 1996 A
5513265 Hirano Apr 1996 A
5525765 Freiheit Jun 1996 A
5550924 Helf Aug 1996 A
5550925 Hori Aug 1996 A
5555447 Kotzin Sep 1996 A
5574793 Hirschhorn Nov 1996 A
5602962 Kellermann Feb 1997 A
5633936 Oh May 1997 A
5645257 Ward Jul 1997 A
D382118 Ferrero Aug 1997 S
5657393 Crow Aug 1997 A
5661813 Shimauchi Aug 1997 A
5673327 Julstrom Sep 1997 A
5687229 Sih Nov 1997 A
5706344 Finn Jan 1998 A
5715319 Chu Feb 1998 A
5717171 Miller Feb 1998 A
D392977 Kim Mar 1998 S
D394061 Fink May 1998 S
5761318 Shimauchi Jun 1998 A
5766702 Lin Jun 1998 A
5787183 Chu Jul 1998 A
5796819 Romesburg Aug 1998 A
5848146 Slattery Dec 1998 A
5870482 Loeppert Feb 1999 A
5878147 Killion Mar 1999 A
5888412 Sooriakumar Mar 1999 A
5888439 Miller Mar 1999 A
D416315 Nanjo Nov 1999 S
5978211 Hong Nov 1999 A
5991277 Maeng Nov 1999 A
6035962 Lin Mar 2000 A
6039457 O'Neal Mar 2000 A
6041127 Elko Mar 2000 A
6049607 Marash Apr 2000 A
D424538 Hayashi May 2000 S
6069961 Nakazawa May 2000 A
6125179 Wu Sep 2000 A
D432518 Muto Oct 2000 S
6128395 De Vries Oct 2000 A
6137887 Anderson Oct 2000 A
6144746 Azima Nov 2000 A
6151399 Killion Nov 2000 A
6173059 Huang Jan 2001 B1
6198831 Azima Mar 2001 B1
6205224 Underbrink Mar 2001 B1
6215881 Azima Apr 2001 B1
6266427 Mathur Jul 2001 B1
6285770 Azima Sep 2001 B1
6301357 Romesburg Oct 2001 B1
6329908 Frecska Dec 2001 B1
6332029 Azima Dec 2001 B1
D453016 Nevill Jan 2002 S
6386315 Roy May 2002 B1
6393129 Conrad May 2002 B1
6424635 Song Jul 2002 B1
6442272 Osovets Aug 2002 B1
6449593 Valve Sep 2002 B1
6481173 Roy Nov 2002 B1
6488367 Debesis Dec 2002 B1
D469090 Tsuji Jan 2003 S
6505057 Finn Jan 2003 B1
6507659 Iredale Jan 2003 B1
6510919 Roy Jan 2003 B1
6526147 Rung Feb 2003 B1
6556682 Gilloire Apr 2003 B1
6592237 Pledger Jul 2003 B1
6622030 Romesburg Sep 2003 B1
D480923 Neubourg Oct 2003 S
6633647 Markow Oct 2003 B1
6665971 Lowry Dec 2003 B2
6694028 Matsuo Feb 2004 B1
6704422 Jensen Mar 2004 B1
D489707 Kobayashi May 2004 S
6731334 Maeng May 2004 B1
6741720 Myatt May 2004 B1
6757393 Spitzer Jun 2004 B1
6768795 Jimen Jul 2004 B2
6868377 Laroche Mar 2005 B1
6885750 Egelmeers Apr 2005 B2
6885986 Gigi Apr 2005 B1
D504889 Andre May 2005 S
6889183 Gunduzhan May 2005 B1
6895093 Ali May 2005 B1
6931123 Hughes Aug 2005 B1
6944312 Mason Sep 2005 B2
D510729 Chen Oct 2005 S
6968064 Ning Nov 2005 B1
6990193 Beaucoup Jan 2006 B2
6993126 Kyrylenko Jan 2006 B1
6993145 Combest Jan 2006 B2
7003099 Zhang Feb 2006 B1
7013267 Huart Mar 2006 B1
7031269 Lee Apr 2006 B2
7035398 Matsuo Apr 2006 B2
7035415 Belt Apr 2006 B2
7050576 Zhang May 2006 B2
7054451 Janse May 2006 B2
D526643 Ishizaki Aug 2006 S
D527372 Allen Aug 2006 S
7092516 Furuta Aug 2006 B2
7092882 Arrowood Aug 2006 B2
7098865 Christensen Aug 2006 B2
7106876 Santiago Sep 2006 B2
7120269 Lowell Oct 2006 B2
7130309 Boaz Oct 2006 B2
D533177 Andre Dec 2006 S
7149320 Haykin Dec 2006 B2
7161534 Tsai Jan 2007 B2
7187765 Popovic Mar 2007 B2
7203308 Kubota Apr 2007 B2
D542543 Bruce May 2007 S
7212628 Mirjana May 2007 B2
D546318 Yoon Jul 2007 S
D546814 Takita Jul 2007 S
D547748 Tsuge Jul 2007 S
7239714 de Blok Jul 2007 B2
D549673 Niitsu Aug 2007 S
7269263 Dedieu Sep 2007 B2
D552570 Niitsu Oct 2007 S
D559553 Mischel Jan 2008 S
7333476 LeBlanc Feb 2008 B2
D566685 Koller Apr 2008 S
7359504 Reuss Apr 2008 B1
7366310 Stinson Apr 2008 B2
7387151 Payne Jun 2008 B1
7412376 Florencio Aug 2008 B2
7415117 Tashev Aug 2008 B2
D578509 Thomas Oct 2008 S
D581510 Albano Nov 2008 S
D582391 Morimoto Dec 2008 S
D587709 Niitsu Mar 2009 S
D589605 Reedy Mar 2009 S
7503616 Linhard Mar 2009 B2
7515719 Hooley Apr 2009 B2
7536769 Pedersen May 2009 B2
D595402 Miyake Jun 2009 S
D595736 Son Jul 2009 S
7558381 Ali Jul 2009 B1
7565949 Tojo Jul 2009 B2
D601585 Andre Oct 2009 S
7651390 Profeta Jan 2010 B1
7660428 Rodman Feb 2010 B2
7667728 Kenoyer Feb 2010 B2
7672445 Zhang Mar 2010 B1
D613338 Marukos Apr 2010 S
7701110 Fukuda Apr 2010 B2
7702116 Stone Apr 2010 B2
D614871 Tang May 2010 S
7724891 Beaucoup May 2010 B2
D617441 Koury Jun 2010 S
7747001 Kellermann Jun 2010 B2
7756278 Moorer Jul 2010 B2
7783063 Pocino Aug 2010 B2
7787328 Chu Aug 2010 B2
7830862 James Nov 2010 B2
7831035 Stokes Nov 2010 B2
7831036 Beaucoup Nov 2010 B2
7856097 Tokuda Dec 2010 B2
7881486 Killion Feb 2011 B1
7894421 Kwan Feb 2011 B2
D636188 Kim Apr 2011 S
7925006 Hirai Apr 2011 B2
7925007 Stokes Apr 2011 B2
7936886 Kim May 2011 B2
7970123 Beaucoup Jun 2011 B2
7970151 Oxford Jun 2011 B2
D642385 Lee Aug 2011 S
D643015 Kim Aug 2011 S
7991167 Oxford Aug 2011 B2
7995768 Miki Aug 2011 B2
8000481 Nishikawa Aug 2011 B2
8005238 Tashev Aug 2011 B2
8019091 Burnett Sep 2011 B2
8041054 Yeldener Oct 2011 B2
8059843 Hung Nov 2011 B2
8064629 Jiang Nov 2011 B2
8085947 Haulick Dec 2011 B2
8085949 Kim Dec 2011 B2
8095120 Blair Jan 2012 B1
8098842 Florencio Jan 2012 B2
8098844 Elko Jan 2012 B2
8103030 Barthel Jan 2012 B2
8109360 Stewart, Jr. Feb 2012 B2
8112272 Nagahama Feb 2012 B2
8116500 Oxford Feb 2012 B2
8121834 Rosec Feb 2012 B2
D655271 Park Mar 2012 S
D656473 Laube Mar 2012 S
8130969 Buck Mar 2012 B2
8130977 Chu Mar 2012 B2
8135143 Ishibashi Mar 2012 B2
8144886 Ishibashi Mar 2012 B2
D658153 Woo Apr 2012 S
8155331 Nakadai Apr 2012 B2
8170882 Davis May 2012 B2
8175291 Chan May 2012 B2
8175871 Wang May 2012 B2
8184801 Hamalainen May 2012 B1
8189765 Nishikawa May 2012 B2
8189810 Wolff May 2012 B2
8194863 Takumai Jun 2012 B2
8199927 Raftery Jun 2012 B1
8204198 Adeney Jun 2012 B2
8204248 Haulick Jun 2012 B2
8208664 Iwasaki Jun 2012 B2
8213596 Beaucoup Jul 2012 B2
8213634 Daniel Jul 2012 B1
8219387 Cutler Jul 2012 B2
8229134 Duraiswami Jul 2012 B2
8233352 Beaucoup Jul 2012 B2
8243951 Ishibashi Aug 2012 B2
8244536 Arun Aug 2012 B2
8249273 Inoda Aug 2012 B2
8259959 Marton Sep 2012 B2
8275120 Stokes, III Sep 2012 B2
8280728 Chen Oct 2012 B2
8284949 Farhang Oct 2012 B2
8284952 Reining Oct 2012 B2
8286749 Stewart Oct 2012 B2
8290142 Lambert Oct 2012 B1
8291670 Gard Oct 2012 B2
8297402 Stewart Oct 2012 B2
8315380 Liu Nov 2012 B2
8331582 Steele Dec 2012 B2
8345898 Reining Jan 2013 B2
8355521 Larson Jan 2013 B2
8370140 Vitte Feb 2013 B2
8379823 Ratmanski Feb 2013 B2
8385557 Tashev Feb 2013 B2
D678329 Lee Mar 2013 S
8395653 Feng Mar 2013 B2
8403107 Stewart Mar 2013 B2
8406436 Craven Mar 2013 B2
8428661 Chen Apr 2013 B2
8433061 Cutler Apr 2013 B2
D682266 Wu May 2013 S
8437490 Marton May 2013 B2
8443930 Stewart, Jr. May 2013 B2
8447590 Ishibashi May 2013 B2
8472639 Reining Jun 2013 B2
8472640 Marton Jun 2013 B2
D685346 Szymanski Jul 2013 S
D686182 Ashiwa Jul 2013 S
8479871 Stewart Jul 2013 B2
8483398 Fozunbal Jul 2013 B2
8498423 Thaden Jul 2013 B2
D687432 Duan Aug 2013 S
8503653 Ahuja Aug 2013 B2
8515089 Nicholson Aug 2013 B2
8515109 Dittberner Aug 2013 B2
8526633 Ukai Sep 2013 B2
8553904 Said Oct 2013 B2
8559611 Ratmanski Oct 2013 B2
D693328 Goetzen Nov 2013 S
8583481 Viveiros Nov 2013 B2
8599194 Lewis Dec 2013 B2
8600443 Kawaguchi Dec 2013 B2
8605890 Zhang Dec 2013 B2
8620650 Walters Dec 2013 B2
8631897 Stewart Jan 2014 B2
8634569 Lu Jan 2014 B2
8638951 Zurek Jan 2014 B2
D699712 Bourne Feb 2014 S
8644477 Gilbert Feb 2014 B2
8654955 Lambert Feb 2014 B1
8654990 Faller Feb 2014 B2
8660274 Wolff Feb 2014 B2
8660275 Buck Feb 2014 B2
8670581 Harman Mar 2014 B2
8672087 Stewart Mar 2014 B2
8675890 Schmidt Mar 2014 B2
8675899 Jung Mar 2014 B2
8676728 Velusamy Mar 2014 B1
8682675 Togami Mar 2014 B2
8724829 Visser May 2014 B2
8730156 Weising May 2014 B2
8744069 Cutler Jun 2014 B2
8744101 Burns Jun 2014 B1
8755536 Chen Jun 2014 B2
8811601 Mohammad Aug 2014 B2
8818002 Tashev Aug 2014 B2
8824693 Per Sep 2014 B2
8842851 Beaucoup Sep 2014 B2
8855326 Derkx Oct 2014 B2
8855327 Tanaka Oct 2014 B2
8861713 Xu Oct 2014 B2
8861756 Zhu Oct 2014 B2
8873789 Bigeh Oct 2014 B2
D717272 Kim Nov 2014 S
8886343 Ishibashi Nov 2014 B2
8893849 Hudson Nov 2014 B2
8898633 Bryant Nov 2014 B2
D718731 Lee Dec 2014 S
8903106 Meyer Dec 2014 B2
8923529 Mccowan Dec 2014 B2
8929564 Kikkeri Jan 2015 B2
8942382 Elko Jan 2015 B2
8965546 Visser Feb 2015 B2
D725059 Kim Mar 2015 S
D725631 McNamara Mar 2015 S
8976977 De Mar 2015 B2
8983089 Chu Mar 2015 B1
8983834 Davis Mar 2015 B2
D726144 Kang Apr 2015 S
D727968 Onoue Apr 2015 S
9002028 Haulick Apr 2015 B2
D729767 Lee May 2015 S
9038301 Zelbacher May 2015 B2
9088336 Mani Jul 2015 B2
9094496 Teutsch Jul 2015 B2
D735717 Lam Aug 2015 S
D737245 Fan Aug 2015 S
9099094 Burnett Aug 2015 B2
9107001 Diethorn Aug 2015 B2
9111543 Per Aug 2015 B2
9113242 Hyun Aug 2015 B2
9113247 Chatlani Aug 2015 B2
9126827 Hsieh Sep 2015 B2
9129223 Velusamy Sep 2015 B1
9140054 Oberbroeckling Sep 2015 B2
D740279 Wu Oct 2015 S
9172345 Kok Oct 2015 B2
D743376 Kim Nov 2015 S
D743939 Seong Nov 2015 S
9196261 Burnett Nov 2015 B2
9197974 Clark Nov 2015 B1
9203494 Tarighat Mehrabani Dec 2015 B2
9215327 Bathurst Dec 2015 B2
9215543 Sun Dec 2015 B2
9226062 Sun Dec 2015 B2
9226070 Hyun Dec 2015 B2
9226088 Pandey Dec 2015 B2
9232185 Graham Jan 2016 B2
9237391 Benesty Jan 2016 B2
9247367 Nobile Jan 2016 B2
9253567 Morcelli Feb 2016 B2
9257132 Gowreesunker Feb 2016 B2
9264553 Pandey Feb 2016 B2
9264805 Buck Feb 2016 B2
9280985 Tawada Mar 2016 B2
9286908 Zhang Mar 2016 B2
9294839 Lambert Mar 2016 B2
9301049 Elko Mar 2016 B2
D754103 Fischer Apr 2016 S
9307326 Elko Apr 2016 B2
9319532 Bao Apr 2016 B2
9319799 Salmon Apr 2016 B2
9326060 Nicholson Apr 2016 B2
D756502 Lee May 2016 S
9330673 Cho May 2016 B2
9338301 Pocino May 2016 B2
9338549 Haulick May 2016 B2
9354310 Visser May 2016 B2
9357080 Beaucoup May 2016 B2
9403670 Schelling Aug 2016 B2
9426598 Walsh Aug 2016 B2
D767748 Nakai Sep 2016 S
9451078 Yang Sep 2016 B2
D769239 Li Oct 2016 S
9462378 Kuech Oct 2016 B2
9473868 Huang Oct 2016 B2
9479627 Rung Oct 2016 B1
9479885 Ivanov Oct 2016 B1
9489948 Chu Nov 2016 B1
9510090 Lissek Nov 2016 B2
9514723 Silfvast Dec 2016 B2
9516412 Shigenaga Dec 2016 B2
9521057 Klingbeil Dec 2016 B2
9549245 Henry Jan 2017 B2
9560446 Chang Jan 2017 B1
9560451 Eichfeld Jan 2017 B2
9565493 Abraham Feb 2017 B2
9578413 Sawa Feb 2017 B2
9578440 Otto Feb 2017 B2
9589556 Gao Mar 2017 B2
9591123 Sorensen Mar 2017 B2
9591404 Chhetri Mar 2017 B1
D784299 Cho Apr 2017 S
9615173 Sako Apr 2017 B2
9628596 Bullough Apr 2017 B1
9635186 Pandey Apr 2017 B2
9635474 Kuster Apr 2017 B2
D787481 Tyssjorunn May 2017 S
D788073 Silvera May 2017 S
9640187 Niemisto May 2017 B2
9641688 Pandey May 2017 B2
9641929 Li May 2017 B2
9641935 Ivanov May 2017 B1
9653091 Matsuo May 2017 B2
9653092 Sun May 2017 B2
9655001 Metzger May 2017 B2
9659576 Kotvis May 2017 B1
D789323 Mackiewicz Jun 2017 S
9674604 Deroo Jun 2017 B2
9692882 Mani Jun 2017 B2
9706057 Mani Jul 2017 B2
9716944 Yliaho Jul 2017 B2
9721582 Huang Aug 2017 B1
9734835 Fujieda Aug 2017 B2
9754572 Salazar Sep 2017 B2
9761243 Taenzer Sep 2017 B2
D801285 Timmins Oct 2017 S
9788119 Vilermo Oct 2017 B2
9813806 Graham Nov 2017 B2
9818426 Kotera Nov 2017 B2
9826211 Sawa Nov 2017 B2
9854101 Pandey Dec 2017 B2
9854363 Sladeczek Dec 2017 B2
9860439 Sawa Jan 2018 B2
9866952 Pandey Jan 2018 B2
D811393 Ahn Feb 2018 S
9894434 Rollow, IV Feb 2018 B2
9930448 Chen Mar 2018 B1
9936290 Mohammad Apr 2018 B2
9966059 Ayrapetian May 2018 B1
9973848 Chhetri May 2018 B2
9980042 Benattar May 2018 B1
D819607 Chui Jun 2018 S
D819631 Matsumiya Jun 2018 S
10015589 Ponvarma Jul 2018 B1
10021506 Johnson Jul 2018 B2
10021515 Mallya Jul 2018 B1
10034116 Kadri Jul 2018 B2
10054320 Choi Aug 2018 B2
10153744 Every Dec 2018 B1
10165386 Lehtiniemi Dec 2018 B2
D841589 Andreas Feb 2019 S
10206030 Matsumoto Feb 2019 B2
10210882 McCowan Feb 2019 B1
10231062 Pedersen Mar 2019 B2
10244121 Mani Mar 2019 B2
10244219 Sawa Mar 2019 B2
10269343 Wingate Apr 2019 B2
10367948 Wells-Rutherford Jul 2019 B2
D857873 Shimada Aug 2019 S
10389861 Mani Aug 2019 B2
10389885 Sun Aug 2019 B2
D860319 Beruto Sep 2019 S
D860997 Jhun Sep 2019 S
D864136 Kim Oct 2019 S
10440469 Barnett Oct 2019 B2
D865723 Cho Nov 2019 S
10566008 Thorpe Feb 2020 B2
10602267 Grosche Mar 2020 B2
D883952 Lucas May 2020 S
10650797 Kumar May 2020 B2
D888020 Lyu Jun 2020 S
10728653 Graham Jul 2020 B2
D900070 Lantz Oct 2020 S
D900071 Lantz Oct 2020 S
D900072 Lantz Oct 2020 S
D900073 Lantz Oct 2020 S
D900074 Lantz Oct 2020 S
10827263 Christoph Nov 2020 B2
10863270 Cornelius Dec 2020 B1
10930297 Christoph Feb 2021 B2
10959018 Shi Mar 2021 B1
10979805 Chowdhary Apr 2021 B2
D924189 Park Jul 2021 S
11109133 Lantz Aug 2021 B2
D940116 Cho Jan 2022 S
20010031058 Anderson Oct 2001 A1
20020015500 Belt Feb 2002 A1
20020041679 Beaucoup Apr 2002 A1
20020048377 Vaudrey Apr 2002 A1
20020064158 Yokoyama May 2002 A1
20020064287 Kawamura May 2002 A1
20020069054 Arrowood Jun 2002 A1
20020110255 Killion Aug 2002 A1
20020126861 Colby Sep 2002 A1
20020131580 Smith Sep 2002 A1
20020140633 Abbas Oct 2002 A1
20020146282 Wilkes Oct 2002 A1
20020149070 Sheplak Oct 2002 A1
20020159603 Hirai Oct 2002 A1
20030026437 Janse Feb 2003 A1
20030053639 Beaucoup Mar 2003 A1
20030059061 Tsuji Mar 2003 A1
20030063762 Tajima Apr 2003 A1
20030063768 Cornelius Apr 2003 A1
20030072461 Moorer Apr 2003 A1
20030107478 Hendricks Jun 2003 A1
20030118200 Beaucoup Jun 2003 A1
20030122777 Grover Jul 2003 A1
20030138119 Pocino Jul 2003 A1
20030156725 Boone Aug 2003 A1
20030161485 Smith Aug 2003 A1
20030163326 Maase Aug 2003 A1
20030169888 Subotic Sep 2003 A1
20030185404 Milsap Oct 2003 A1
20030198339 Roy Oct 2003 A1
20030198359 Killion Oct 2003 A1
20030202107 Slattery Oct 2003 A1
20040013038 Kajala Jan 2004 A1
20040013252 Craner Jan 2004 A1
20040076305 Santiago Apr 2004 A1
20040105557 Matsuo Jun 2004 A1
20040125942 Beaucoup Jul 2004 A1
20040175006 Kim Sep 2004 A1
20040202345 Stenberg Oct 2004 A1
20040240664 Freed Dec 2004 A1
20050005494 Way Jan 2005 A1
20050041530 Goudie Feb 2005 A1
20050069156 Haapapuro Mar 2005 A1
20050094580 Kumar May 2005 A1
20050094795 Rambo May 2005 A1
20050149320 Kajala Jul 2005 A1
20050157897 Saltykov Jul 2005 A1
20050175189 Lee Aug 2005 A1
20050175190 Tashev Aug 2005 A1
20050213747 Popovich Sep 2005 A1
20050221867 Zurek Oct 2005 A1
20050238196 Furuno Oct 2005 A1
20050270906 Ramenzoni Dec 2005 A1
20050271221 Cerwin Dec 2005 A1
20050286698 Bathurst Dec 2005 A1
20050286729 Harwood Dec 2005 A1
20060083390 Kaderavek Apr 2006 A1
20060088173 Rodman Apr 2006 A1
20060093128 Oxford May 2006 A1
20060098403 Smith May 2006 A1
20060104458 Kenoyer May 2006 A1
20060109983 Young May 2006 A1
20060151256 Lee Jul 2006 A1
20060159293 Azima Jul 2006 A1
20060161430 Schweng Jul 2006 A1
20060165242 Miki Jul 2006 A1
20060192976 Hall Aug 2006 A1
20060198541 Henry Sep 2006 A1
20060204022 Hooley Sep 2006 A1
20060215866 Francisco Sep 2006 A1
20060222187 Jarrett Oct 2006 A1
20060233353 Beaucoup Oct 2006 A1
20060239471 Mao Oct 2006 A1
20060262942 Oxford Nov 2006 A1
20060269080 Oxford Nov 2006 A1
20060269086 Page Nov 2006 A1
20070006474 Taniguchi Jan 2007 A1
20070009116 Reining Jan 2007 A1
20070019828 Hughes Jan 2007 A1
20070053524 Haulick Mar 2007 A1
20070093714 Beaucoup Apr 2007 A1
20070116255 Derkx May 2007 A1
20070120029 Keung May 2007 A1
20070165871 Roovers Jul 2007 A1
20070230712 Belt Oct 2007 A1
20070253561 Williams Nov 2007 A1
20070269066 Derleth Nov 2007 A1
20080008339 Ryan Jan 2008 A1
20080033723 Jang Feb 2008 A1
20080046235 Chen Feb 2008 A1
20080056517 Algazi Mar 2008 A1
20080101622 Sugiyama May 2008 A1
20080130907 Sudo Jun 2008 A1
20080144848 Buck Jun 2008 A1
20080168283 Penning Jul 2008 A1
20080188965 Bruey Aug 2008 A1
20080212805 Fincham Sep 2008 A1
20080232607 Tashev Sep 2008 A1
20080247567 Kjolerbakken Oct 2008 A1
20080253553 Li Oct 2008 A1
20080253589 Trahms Oct 2008 A1
20080259731 Happonen Oct 2008 A1
20080260175 Elko Oct 2008 A1
20080279400 Knoll Nov 2008 A1
20080285772 Haulick Nov 2008 A1
20090003586 Lai Jan 2009 A1
20090030536 Gur Jan 2009 A1
20090052684 Ishibashi Feb 2009 A1
20090086998 Jeong Apr 2009 A1
20090087000 Ko Apr 2009 A1
20090087001 Jiang Apr 2009 A1
20090094817 Killion Apr 2009 A1
20090129609 Oh May 2009 A1
20090147967 Ishibashi Jun 2009 A1
20090150149 Cutter Jun 2009 A1
20090161880 Hooley Jun 2009 A1
20090169027 Ura Jul 2009 A1
20090173030 Gulbrandsen Jul 2009 A1
20090173570 Levit Jul 2009 A1
20090226004 Moeller Sep 2009 A1
20090233545 Sutskover Sep 2009 A1
20090237561 Kobayashi Sep 2009 A1
20090254340 Sun Oct 2009 A1
20090274318 Ishibashi Nov 2009 A1
20090310794 Ishibashi Dec 2009 A1
20100011644 Kramer Jan 2010 A1
20100034397 Nakadai Feb 2010 A1
20100074433 Zhang Mar 2010 A1
20100111323 Marton May 2010 A1
20100111324 Yeldener May 2010 A1
20100119097 Ohtsuka May 2010 A1
20100123785 Chen May 2010 A1
20100128892 Chen May 2010 A1
20100128901 Herman May 2010 A1
20100131749 Kim May 2010 A1
20100142721 Wada Jun 2010 A1
20100150364 Buck Jun 2010 A1
20100158268 Marton Jun 2010 A1
20100165071 Ishibashi Jul 2010 A1
20100166219 Marton Jul 2010 A1
20100189275 Christoph Jul 2010 A1
20100189299 Grant Jul 2010 A1
20100202628 Meyer Aug 2010 A1
20100208605 Wang Aug 2010 A1
20100215184 Buck Aug 2010 A1
20100215189 Marton Aug 2010 A1
20100217590 Nemer Aug 2010 A1
20100245624 Beaucoup Sep 2010 A1
20100246873 Chen Sep 2010 A1
20100284185 Ngai Nov 2010 A1
20100305728 Aiso Dec 2010 A1
20100314513 Evans Dec 2010 A1
20110002469 Ojala Jan 2011 A1
20110007921 Stewart Jan 2011 A1
20110033063 Mcgrath Feb 2011 A1
20110038229 Beaucoup Feb 2011 A1
20110096136 Liu Apr 2011 A1
20110096631 Kondo Apr 2011 A1
20110096915 Nemer Apr 2011 A1
20110164761 Mccowan Jul 2011 A1
20110194719 Frater Aug 2011 A1
20110211706 Tanaka Sep 2011 A1
20110235821 Okita Sep 2011 A1
20110268287 Ishibashi Nov 2011 A1
20110311064 Teutsch Dec 2011 A1
20110311085 Stewart Dec 2011 A1
20110317862 Hosoe Dec 2011 A1
20120002835 Stewart Jan 2012 A1
20120014049 Ogle Jan 2012 A1
20120027227 Kok Feb 2012 A1
20120076316 Zhu Mar 2012 A1
20120080260 Stewart Apr 2012 A1
20120093344 Sun Apr 2012 A1
20120117474 Miki May 2012 A1
20120128160 Kim May 2012 A1
20120128175 Visser May 2012 A1
20120155688 Wilson Jun 2012 A1
20120155703 Hernandez-Abrego Jun 2012 A1
20120163625 Siotis Jun 2012 A1
20120169826 Jeong Jul 2012 A1
20120177219 Mullen Jul 2012 A1
20120182429 Forutanpour Jul 2012 A1
20120207335 Spaanderman Aug 2012 A1
20120224709 Keddem Sep 2012 A1
20120243698 Elko Sep 2012 A1
20120262536 Chen Oct 2012 A1
20120288079 Burnett Nov 2012 A1
20120288114 Duraiswami Nov 2012 A1
20120294472 Hudson Nov 2012 A1
20120327115 Chhetri Dec 2012 A1
20120328142 Horibe Dec 2012 A1
20130002797 Thapa Jan 2013 A1
20130004013 Stewart Jan 2013 A1
20130015014 Stewart Jan 2013 A1
20130016847 Steiner Jan 2013 A1
20130028451 De Roo Jan 2013 A1
20130029684 Kawaguchi Jan 2013 A1
20130034241 Pandey Feb 2013 A1
20130039504 Pandey Feb 2013 A1
20130083911 Bathurst Apr 2013 A1
20130094689 Tanaka Apr 2013 A1
20130101141 McElveen Apr 2013 A1
20130136274 Per May 2013 A1
20130142343 Matsui Jun 2013 A1
20130147835 Lee Jun 2013 A1
20130156198 Kim Jun 2013 A1
20130182190 McCartney Jul 2013 A1
20130206501 Yu Aug 2013 A1
20130216066 Yerrace Aug 2013 A1
20130226593 Magnusson Aug 2013 A1
20130251181 Stewart Sep 2013 A1
20130264144 Hudson Oct 2013 A1
20130271559 Feng Oct 2013 A1
20130294616 Hans Nov 2013 A1
20130297302 Pan Nov 2013 A1
20130304476 Kim Nov 2013 A1
20130304479 Teller Nov 2013 A1
20130329908 Lindahl Dec 2013 A1
20130332156 Tackin Dec 2013 A1
20130336516 Stewart Dec 2013 A1
20130343549 Vemireddy Dec 2013 A1
20140003635 Mohammad Jan 2014 A1
20140010383 Mackey Jan 2014 A1
20140016794 Lu Jan 2014 A1
20140029761 Maenpaa Jan 2014 A1
20140037097 Mark Feb 2014 A1
20140050332 Nielsen Feb 2014 A1
20140072151 Ochs Mar 2014 A1
20140098233 Martin Apr 2014 A1
20140098964 Rosca Apr 2014 A1
20140122060 Kaszczuk May 2014 A1
20140177857 Kuster Jun 2014 A1
20140233777 Tseng Aug 2014 A1
20140233778 Hardiman Aug 2014 A1
20140264654 Salmon Sep 2014 A1
20140265774 Stewart Sep 2014 A1
20140270271 Dehe Sep 2014 A1
20140286518 Stewart Sep 2014 A1
20140295768 Wu Oct 2014 A1
20140301586 Stewart Oct 2014 A1
20140307882 Leblanc Oct 2014 A1
20140314251 Rosca Oct 2014 A1
20140341392 Lambert Nov 2014 A1
20140357177 Stewart Dec 2014 A1
20140363008 Chen Dec 2014 A1
20150003638 Kasai Jan 2015 A1
20150025878 Gowreesunker Jan 2015 A1
20150030172 Gaensler Jan 2015 A1
20150033042 Iwamoto Jan 2015 A1
20150050967 Bao Feb 2015 A1
20150055796 Nugent Feb 2015 A1
20150055797 Nguyen Feb 2015 A1
20150063579 Bao Mar 2015 A1
20150070188 Aramburu Mar 2015 A1
20150078581 Etter Mar 2015 A1
20150078582 Graham Mar 2015 A1
20150097719 Balachandreswaran Apr 2015 A1
20150104023 Bilobrov Apr 2015 A1
20150117672 Christoph Apr 2015 A1
20150118960 Petit Apr 2015 A1
20150126255 Yang May 2015 A1
20150156578 Alexandridis Jun 2015 A1
20150163577 Benesty Jun 2015 A1
20150185825 Mullins Jul 2015 A1
20150189423 Giannuzzi Jul 2015 A1
20150208171 Funakoshi Jul 2015 A1
20150237424 Wilker Aug 2015 A1
20150281832 Kishimoto Oct 2015 A1
20150281833 Shigenaga Oct 2015 A1
20150281834 Takano Oct 2015 A1
20150312662 Kishimoto Oct 2015 A1
20150312691 Virolainen Oct 2015 A1
20150326968 Shigenaga Nov 2015 A1
20150341734 Sherman Nov 2015 A1
20150350621 Sawa Dec 2015 A1
20150358734 Butler Dec 2015 A1
20160011851 Zhang Jan 2016 A1
20160021478 Katagiri Jan 2016 A1
20160029120 Nesta Jan 2016 A1
20160031700 Sparks Feb 2016 A1
20160037277 Matsumoto Feb 2016 A1
20160055859 Finlow-Bates Feb 2016 A1
20160080867 Nugent Mar 2016 A1
20160088392 Huttunen Mar 2016 A1
20160100092 Bohac Apr 2016 A1
20160105473 Klingbeil Apr 2016 A1
20160111109 Tsujikawa Apr 2016 A1
20160127527 Mani May 2016 A1
20160134928 Ogle May 2016 A1
20160142548 Pandey May 2016 A1
20160142814 Deroo May 2016 A1
20160142815 Norris May 2016 A1
20160148057 Oh May 2016 A1
20160150315 Tzirkel-Hancock May 2016 A1
20160150316 Kubota May 2016 A1
20160155455 Petteri Jun 2016 A1
20160165340 Benattar Jun 2016 A1
20160173976 Podhradsky Jun 2016 A1
20160173978 Li Jun 2016 A1
20160189727 Wu Jun 2016 A1
20160192068 Ng Jun 2016 A1
20160196836 Yu Jul 2016 A1
20160234593 Matsumoto Aug 2016 A1
20160275961 Yu Sep 2016 A1
20160295279 Srinivasan Oct 2016 A1
20160300584 Pandey Oct 2016 A1
20160302002 Lambert Oct 2016 A1
20160302006 Pandey Oct 2016 A1
20160323667 Shumard Nov 2016 A1
20160323668 Abraham Nov 2016 A1
20160330545 Mcelveen Nov 2016 A1
20160337523 Pandey Nov 2016 A1
20160353200 Bigeh Dec 2016 A1
20160357508 Moore Dec 2016 A1
20170019744 Matsumoto Jan 2017 A1
20170064451 Park Mar 2017 A1
20170105066 Mclaughlin Apr 2017 A1
20170134849 Pandey May 2017 A1
20170134850 Graham May 2017 A1
20170164101 Rollow, IV Jun 2017 A1
20170180861 Chen Jun 2017 A1
20170206064 Breazeal Jul 2017 A1
20170230748 Shumard Aug 2017 A1
20170264999 Fukuda Sep 2017 A1
20170303887 Richmond Oct 2017 A1
20170308352 Kessler Oct 2017 A1
20170374454 Bernardini Dec 2017 A1
20180083848 Siddiqi Mar 2018 A1
20180102136 Ebenezer Apr 2018 A1
20180109873 Xiang Apr 2018 A1
20180115799 Thiele Apr 2018 A1
20180160224 Graham Jun 2018 A1
20180196585 Densham Jul 2018 A1
20180219922 Bryans Aug 2018 A1
20180227666 Barnett Aug 2018 A1
20180292079 Branham Oct 2018 A1
20180310096 Shumard Oct 2018 A1
20180313558 Byers Nov 2018 A1
20180338205 Abraham Nov 2018 A1
20180359565 Kim Dec 2018 A1
20190042187 Truong Feb 2019 A1
20190166424 Harney May 2019 A1
20190215540 Nicol Jul 2019 A1
20190230436 Tsingos Jul 2019 A1
20190259408 Freeman Aug 2019 A1
20190268683 Miyahara Aug 2019 A1
20190295540 Grima Sep 2019 A1
20190295569 Wang Sep 2019 A1
20190319677 Hansen Oct 2019 A1
20190371354 Lester Dec 2019 A1
20190373362 Ansai Dec 2019 A1
20190385629 Moravy Dec 2019 A1
20190387311 Schultz Dec 2019 A1
20200015021 Leppanen Jan 2020 A1
20200021910 Rollow, IV Jan 2020 A1
20200037068 Barnett Jan 2020 A1
20200068297 Rollow, IV Feb 2020 A1
20200100009 Lantz Mar 2020 A1
20200100025 Shumard Mar 2020 A1
20200137485 Yamakawa Apr 2020 A1
20200145753 Rollow, IV May 2020 A1
20200152218 Kikuhara May 2020 A1
20200162618 Enteshari May 2020 A1
20200228663 Wells-Rutherford Jul 2020 A1
20200251119 Yang Aug 2020 A1
20200275204 Labosco Aug 2020 A1
20200278043 Cao Sep 2020 A1
20200288237 Abraham Sep 2020 A1
20210012789 Husain Jan 2021 A1
20210021940 Petersen Jan 2021 A1
20210044881 Lantz Feb 2021 A1
20210051397 Veselinovic Feb 2021 A1
20210098014 Tanaka Apr 2021 A1
20210098015 Pandey Apr 2021 A1
20210120335 Veselinovic Apr 2021 A1
20210200504 Park Jul 2021 A1
20210375298 Zhang Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (150)
Number Date Country
2359771 Apr 2003 CA
2475283 Jan 2005 CA
2505496 Oct 2006 CA
2838856 Dec 2012 CA
2846323 Sep 2014 CA
1780495 May 2006 CN
101217830 Jul 2008 CN
101833954 Sep 2010 CN
101860776 Oct 2010 CN
101894558 Nov 2010 CN
102646418 Aug 2012 CN
102821336 Dec 2012 CN
102833664 Dec 2012 CN
102860039 Jan 2013 CN
104036784 Sep 2014 CN
104053088 Sep 2014 CN
104080289 Oct 2014 CN
104347076 Feb 2015 CN
104581463 Apr 2015 CN
105355210 Feb 2016 CN
105548998 May 2016 CN
106162427 Nov 2016 CN
106251857 Dec 2016 CN
106851036 Jun 2017 CN
107221336 Sep 2017 CN
107534725 Jan 2018 CN
108172235 Jun 2018 CN
109087664 Dec 2018 CN
208190895 Dec 2018 CN
109727604 May 2019 CN
110010147 Jul 2019 CN
306391029 Mar 2021 CN
2941485 Apr 1981 DE
0077546430001 Mar 2020 EM
0381498 Aug 1990 EP
0594098 Apr 1994 EP
0869697 Oct 1998 EP
1180914 Feb 2002 EP
1184676 Mar 2002 EP
0944228 Jun 2003 EP
1439526 Jul 2004 EP
1651001 Apr 2006 EP
1727344 Nov 2006 EP
1906707 Apr 2008 EP
1952393 Aug 2008 EP
1962547 Aug 2008 EP
2133867 Dec 2009 EP
2159789 Mar 2010 EP
2197219 Jun 2010 EP
2360940 Aug 2011 EP
2710788 Mar 2014 EP
2721837 Apr 2014 EP
2772910 Sep 2014 EP
2778310 Sep 2014 EP
2942975 Nov 2015 EP
2988527 Feb 2016 EP
3131311 Feb 2017 EP
2393601 Mar 2004 GB
2446620 Aug 2008 GB
S63144699 Jun 1988 JP
H01260967 Oct 1989 JP
H0241099 Feb 1990 JP
H05260589 Oct 1993 JP
H07336790 Dec 1995 JP
2518823 Jul 1996 JP
3175622 Jun 2001 JP
2003060530 Feb 2003 JP
2003087890 Mar 2003 JP
2004349806 Dec 2004 JP
2004537232 Dec 2004 JP
2005323084 Nov 2005 JP
2006094389 Apr 2006 JP
2006101499 Apr 2006 JP
4120646 Aug 2006 JP
4258472 Aug 2006 JP
4196956 Sep 2006 JP
2006340151 Dec 2006 JP
4760160 Jan 2007 JP
4752403 Mar 2007 JP
2007089058 Apr 2007 JP
4867579 Jun 2007 JP
2007208503 Aug 2007 JP
2007228069 Sep 2007 JP
2007228070 Sep 2007 JP
2007274131 Oct 2007 JP
2007274463 Oct 2007 JP
2007288679 Nov 2007 JP
2008005347 Jan 2008 JP
2008042754 Feb 2008 JP
2008154056 Jul 2008 JP
2008259022 Oct 2008 JP
2008263336 Oct 2008 JP
2008312002 Dec 2008 JP
2009206671 Sep 2009 JP
2010028653 Feb 2010 JP
2010114554 May 2010 JP
2010268129 Nov 2010 JP
2011015018 Jan 2011 JP
4779748 Sep 2011 JP
2012165189 Aug 2012 JP
5028944 Sep 2012 JP
5139111 Feb 2013 JP
5306565 Oct 2013 JP
5685173 Mar 2015 JP
2016051038 Apr 2016 JP
100298300 May 2001 KR
100901464 Jun 2009 KR
100960781 Jun 2010 KR
1020130033723 Apr 2013 KR
300856915 May 2016 KR
201331932 Aug 2013 TW
I484478 May 2015 TW
1997008896 Mar 1997 WO
1998047291 Oct 1998 WO
2000030402 May 2000 WO
2003073786 Sep 2003 WO
2003088429 Oct 2003 WO
2004027754 Apr 2004 WO
2004090865 Oct 2004 WO
2006049260 May 2006 WO
2006071119 Jul 2006 WO
2006114015 Nov 2006 WO
2006121896 Nov 2006 WO
2007045971 Apr 2007 WO
2008074249 Jun 2008 WO
2008125523 Oct 2008 WO
2009039783 Apr 2009 WO
2009109069 Sep 2009 WO
2010001508 Jan 2010 WO
WO-2010091999 Aug 2010 WO
2010140084 Dec 2010 WO
2010144148 Dec 2010 WO
2011104501 Sep 2011 WO
2012122132 Sep 2012 WO
2012140435 Oct 2012 WO
2012160459 Nov 2012 WO
2012174159 Dec 2012 WO
2013016986 Feb 2013 WO
2013182118 Dec 2013 WO
2014156292 Oct 2014 WO
2016176429 Nov 2016 WO
2016179211 Nov 2016 WO
2017208022 Dec 2017 WO
2018140444 Aug 2018 WO
2018140618 Aug 2018 WO
2018211806 Nov 2018 WO
2019231630 Dec 2019 WO
2020168873 Aug 2020 WO
2020191354 Sep 2020 WO
211843001 Nov 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (276)
Entry
“Vsa 2050 II Digitally Steerable Column Speaker,” Web page https://www.rcf.it/en_US/products/product-detail/vsa-2050-ii/972389, 15 pages, Dec. 24, 2018.
Arnold, et al., “A directional acoustic array using silicon micromachined piezoresistive microphones,” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 113 (1), pp. 289-298, Jan. 2003 (10 pp.).
Chou, “Frequency-Independent Beamformer with Low Response Error,” 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 2995-2998, May 9, 1995, 4 pp.
Fohhn Audio New Generation of Beam Steering Systems Available Now, audioXpress Staff, May 10, 2017, 8 pp.
ICONYX Gen5, Product Overview; Renkus-Heinz, Dec. 24, 2018, 2 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/029751 dated Nov. 28, 2016, 21 pp.
M. Kolund{hacek over (z)}ija, C. Faller and M. Vetterii, “Baffled circular loudspeaker array with broadband high directivity,” 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Dallas, TX, 2010, pp. 73-76.
Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-023781 dated Jun. 20, 2016.
Olszewski, et al., “Steerable Highly Directional Audio Beam Loudspeaker,” Interspeech 2005, 4 pp.
Amazon webpage for Metalfab MFLCRFG (last visited Apr. 22, 2020) available at <https://www.amazon.com/RETURN-FILTERGRILLE-Drop-Ceiling/dp/B0064Q9A7l/ref=sr 12? dchild=1&keywords=drop+ceiling+return+air+grille&qid=1585862723&s=hi&sr=1-2>, 11 pp.
Armstrong “Walls” Catalog available at <https://www.armstrongceilings.com/content/dam/armstrongceilings/commercial/north-america/catalogs/armstrong-ceilings-wallsspecifiers-reference.pdf>, 2019, 30 pp.
Armstrong Tectum Ceiling & Wall Panels Catalog available at <https://www.armstrongceilings.com/content/dam/armstrongceilings/commercial/north-america/brochures/tectum-brochure.pdf>, 2019, 16 pp.
Armstrong Woodworks Concealed Catalog available at <https://sweets.construction.com/swts_content_files/3824/442581.pdf>, 2014, 6 pp.
Armstrong Woodworks Walls Catalog available at <https://www.armstrongceilings.com/pdbupimagesclg/220600.pdf/download/data-sheet-woodworks-walls.pdf>, 2019, 2 pp.
Armstrong, Acoustical Design: Exposed Structure, available at <https://www.armstrongceilings.com/pdbupimagesclg/217142.pdf/download/acoustical-design-exposed-structurespaces-brochure.pdf>, 2018, 19 pp.
Armstrong, Ceiling Systems, Brochure page for Armstrong Softlook, 1995, 2 pp.
Armstrong, Excerpts from Armstrong 2011-2012 Ceiling Wall Systems Catalog, available at <https://web.archive.org/web/20121116034120/http://www.armst rong.com/commceilingsna/en_us/pdf/ceilings_catalog_screen-2011 .pdf>, as early as 2012, 162 pp.
Armstrong, i-Ceilings, Brochure, 2009, 12 pp.
Benesty, et al., “Microphone Array Signal Processing,” Springer, 2010, 20 pp.
BZ-3a Installation Instructions, XEDIT Corporation, Available at <chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcgiclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.servo reelers, com %2Fmt-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F05%2Fbz-a-3universal-2017c.pdf&clen=189067&chunk=true>, 1 p.
Cao, “Survey on Acoustic Vector Sensor and its Applications in Signal Processing” Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Jul. 2014, 17 pp.
Circuit Specialists webpage for an aluminum enclosure, available at <https://www.circuitspecialists.com/metal-instrument-enclosure-la7.html? otaid=gpl&gclid=EAIalQobChMI2JTw-Ynm6AIVgbblCh3F4QKuEAkYBiABEgJZMPD_BwE>, 3 pp.
ClearOne Launches Second Generation of its Groundbreaking Beamforming Microphone Array, Press Release, Acquire Media, Jun. 1, 2016, 2 pp.
ClearOne to Unveil Beamforming Microphone Array with Adaptive Steering and Next Generation Acoustic Echo Cancellation Technology, Press Release, InfoComm, Jun. 4, 2012, 1 p.
CTG Audio, CTG FS-400 and RS-800 with “Beamforming” Technology, Datasheet, As early as 2009, 2 pp.
CTG Audio, CTG User Manual for the FS- 400/800 Beamforming Mixers, Nov. 2008, 26 pp.
CTG Audio, Frequently Asked Questions, As early as 2009, 2 pp.
CTG Audio, Installation Manual and User Guidelines for the Soundman SM 02 System, May 2001, 29 pp.
CTG Audio, Introducing the CTG FS-400 and FS-800 with Beamforming Technology, As early as 2008, 2 pp.
CTG Audio, Meeting the Demand for Ceiling Mics in the Enterprise 5 Best Practices, Brochure, 2012, 9 pp.
Diethorn, “Audio Signal Processing For Next-Generation Multimedia Communication Systems,” Chapter 4, 2004, 9 pp.
Digikey webpage for Converta box (last visited Apr. 22, 2020) <https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/bud-industries/CU-452-A/377-1969-ND/439257? utm_adgroup=Boxes&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Shopping_Boxes %2C%20Enclosures%2C%20Racks NEW&utm term=&utm content=Boxes&gclid=EAlalQobC hMI2JTw-Ynm6AIVgbblCh3F4QKuEAkYCSABEgKybPD_BwE>, 3 pp.
Digikey webpage for Pomona Box (last visited Apr. 22, 2020) available at <https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/pomonaelectronics/3306/501-2054-ND/736489>, 2 pp.
Digital Wireless Conference System, MCW-D 50, Beyerdynamic Inc., 2009, 18 pp.
Dominguez, et al., “Towards an Environmental Measurement Cloud: Delivering Pollution Awareness to the Public,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 10, Issue 3, Mar. 31, 2014, 17 pp.
Double Condenser Microphone SM 69, Datasheet, Georg Neumann GmbH, available at <https://ende.neumann.com/product_files/7453/download>, 8 pp.
Eargle, “The Microphone Handbook,” Elar Publ. Co., 1st ed., 1981, 4 pp.
Enright, Notes From Logan, June edition of Scanlines, Jun. 2009, 9 pp.
Hald, et al., “A class of optimal broadband phased array geometries designed for easy construction,” 2002 Int'l Congress & Expo, on Noise Control Engineering, Aug. 2002, 6 pp.
Invensense, Recommendations for Mounting and Connecting InvenSense MEMS Microphones, Application Note AN-1003, 2013, 11 pp.
Johnson, et al., “Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques,” p. 59, Prentice Hall, 1993, 3 pp.
Klegon, “Achieve Invisible Audio with the MXA910 Ceiling Array Microphone,” Jun. 27, 2016, 10 pp.
Lai, et al., “Design of Robust Steerable Broadband Beamformers with Spiral Arrays and the Farrow Filter Structure,” Proc. Intl. Workshop Acoustic Echo Noise Control, 2010, 4 pp.
Li, “Broadband Beamforming and Direction Finding Using Concentric Ring Array,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Jul. 2005, 163 pp.
Liu, et al., “Wideband Beamforming,” Wiley Series on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, pp. 143-198, 2010, 297 pp.
MFLCRFG Datasheet, Metal_Fab Inc., Sep. 7, 2007, 1 p.
Milanovic, et al., “Design and Realization of FPGA Platform for Real Time Acoustic Signal Acquisition and Data Processing” 22nd Telecommunications Forum TELFOR, 2014, 6 pp.
Pomona, Model 3306, Datasheet, Jun. 9, 1999, 1 p.
Prime, et al., “Beamforming Array Optimisation Averaged Sound Source Mapping on a Model Wind Turbine,” ResearchGate, Nov. 2014, 10 pp.
Sessler, et al., “Toroidal Microphones,” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, vol. 46, No. 1, 1969, 10 pp.
Shure Debuts Microflex Advance Ceiling and Table Array Microphones, Press Release, Feb. 9, 2016, 4 pp.
Shure Inc., A910-HCM Hard Ceiling Mount, retrieved from website <http://www.shure.com/en-US/products/accessories/a910hcm> on Jan. 16, 2020, 3 pp.
Shure, MXA910 With IntelliMix, Ceiling Array Microphone, available at <https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/mxa910>, as early as 2020, 12 pp.
Shure, New MXA910 Variant Now Available, Press Release, Dec. 13, 2019, 5 pp.
Shure, Q&A in Response to Recent US Court Ruling on Shure MXA910, Available at <https://www.shure.com/en-US/meta/legal/q-and-a-inresponse-to-recent-us-court-ruling-on-shure-mxa910-response>, As early as 2020, 5 pp.
Shure, RK244G Replacement Screen and Grille, Datasheet, 2013, 1 p.
Shure, The Microflex Advance MXA310 Table Array Microphone, Available at <https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/mxa310>, As early as 2020, 12 pp.
SM 69 Stereo Microphone, Datasheet, Georg Neumann GmbH, Available at <https://ende.neumann.com/product_files/6552/download>, 1 p.
Vicente, “Adaptive Array Signal Processing Using the Concentric Ring Array and the Spherical Array,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri, May 2009, 226 pp.
Warsitz, et al., “Blind Acoustic Beamforming Based on Generalized Eigenvalue Decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 15, No. 5, 2007, 11 pp.
“Philips Hue Bulbs and Wireless Connected Lighting System,” Web page https://www.philips-hue.com/en-in, 8 pp, Sep. 23, 2020, retrieved from Internet Archive Wayback Machine, <https://web.archive.org/web/20200923171037/https://www.philips-hue.com/en-in> on Sep. 27, 2021.
Advanced Network Devices, IPSCM Ceiling Tile IP Speaker, Feb. 2011, 2 pgs.
Advanced Network Devices, IPSCM Standard 2' by 2' Ceiling Tile Speaker, 2 pgs.
Affes, et al., “A Signal Subspace Tracking Algorithm for Microphone Array Processing of Speech,” IEEE Trans. On Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 5, No. 5, Sep. 1997, pp. 425-437.
Affes, et al., “A Source Subspace Tracking Array of Microphones for Double Talk Situations,” 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings, May 1996, pp. 909-912.
Affes, et al., “An Algorithm for Multisource Beamforming and Multitarget Tracking,” IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing, vol. 44, No. 6, Jun. 1996, pp. 1512-1522.
Affes, et al., “Robust Adaptive Beamforming via LMS-Like Target Tracking,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Apr. 1994, pp. IV-269-IV-272.
Ahonen, et al., “Directional Analysis of Sound Field with Linear Microphone Array and Applications in Sound Reproduction,” Audio Engineering Socity, Convention Paper 7329, May 2008, 11 pp.
Alarifi, et al., “Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning Technologies: Analysis and Recent Advances,” Sensors 2016, vol. 16, No. 707, 36 pp.
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., I-Ceilings Sound Systems Speaker Panels, 2002, 4 pgs.
Atlas Sound, I128SYSM IP Compliant Loudspeaker System with Microphone Data Sheet, 2009, 2 pgs.
Atlas Sound,1'X2' IP Speaker with Micophone for Suspended Ceiling Systems, https://www.atlasied.com/i128sysm, retrieved Oct. 25, 2017, 5 pgs.
Audio Technica, ES945 Omnidirectional Condenser Boundary Microphones, https://eu.audio-technica.com/resources/ES945%20Specifications.pdf, 2007, 1 pg.
Audix Microphones, Audix Introduces Innovative Ceiling Mies, http://audixusa.com/docs_12/latest_news/EFplFkAAklOtSdolke.shtml, Jun. 2011,6 pgs.
Audix Microphones, M70 Flush Mount Ceiling Mic, May 2016, 2 pgs.
Automixer Gated, Information Sheet, MIT, Nov. 2019, 9 pp.
Avnetwork, “Top Five Conference Room Mic Myths,” Feb. 25, 2015, 14 pp.
Beh, et al., “Combining Acoustic Echo Cancellation and Adaptive Beamforming for Achieving Robust Speech Interface in Mobile Robot,” 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 2008, pp. 1693-1698.
Benesty, et al., “A New Class of Doubletalk Detectors Based on Cross-Correlation,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 2, Mar. 2000, pp. 168-172.
Benesty, et al., “Adaptive Algorithms for Mimo Acoustic Echo Cancellation,” AI2 Allen Institute for Artifical Intelligence, 2003.
Benesty, et al., “Differential Beamforming,” Fundamentals of Signal Enhancement and Array Signal Processing, First Edition, 2017, 39 pp.
Benesty, et al., “Frequency-Domain Adaptive Filtering Revisited, Generalization to the Multi-Channel Case, and Application to Acoustic Echo Cancellation,” 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Proceedings, Jun. 2000, pp. 789-792.
Berkun, et al., “Combined Beamformers for Robust Broadband Regularized Superdirective Beamforming,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 23, No. 5, May 2015, 10 pp.
Beyer Dynamic, Classis BM 32-33-34 DE-EN-FR 2016, 1 pg.
Beyer Dynamic, Classis-BM-33-PZA1, 1 pg.
BNO55, Intelligent 9-axis absolute orientation sensor, Data sheet, Bosch, Nov. 2020, 118 pp.
Boyd, et al., Convex Optimization, Mar. 15, 1999, 216 pgs.
Brandstein, et al., “Microphone Arrays: Signal Processing Techniques and Applications,” Digital Signal Processing, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2001, 401 pgs.
Brooks, et al., “A Quantitative Assessment of Group Delay Methods for Identifying Glottal Closures in Voiced Speech,” IEEE Transaction on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 14, No. 2, Mar. 2006, 11 pp.
Bruel & Kjaer, by J.J. Christensen and J. Hald, Technical Review: Beamforming, No. 1, 2004, 54 pgs.
BSS Audio, Soundweb London Application Guides, 2010, 120 pgs.
Buchner, et al., “An Acoustic Human-Machine Interface with Multi-Channel Sound Reproduction,” IEEE Fourth Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Oct. 2001, pp. 359-364.
Buchner, et al., “An Efficient Combination of Multi-Channel Acoustic Echo Cancellation with a Beamforming Microphone Array,” International Workshop on Hands-Free Speech Communication (HSC2001), Apr. 2001, pp. 55-58.
Buchner, et al., “Full-Duplex Communication Systems Using Loudspeaker Arrays and Microphone Arrays,” IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Aug. 2002, pp. 509-512.
Buchner, et al., “Generalized Multichannel Frequency-Domain Adaptive Filtering: Efficient Realization and Application to Hands-Free Speech Communication,” Signal Processing 85, 2005, pp. 549-570.
Buchner, et al., “Multichannel Frequency-Domain Adaptive Filtering with Application to Multichannel Acoustic Echo Cancellation,” Adaptive Signal Processing, 2003, pp. 95-128.
Buck, “Aspects of First-Order Differential Microphone Arrays in the Presence of Sensor Imperfections,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 13.2, 2002, 8 pp.
Buck, et al., “First Order Differential Microphone Arrays for Automotive Applications,” 7th International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control, Darmstadt University of Technology, Sep. 10-13, 2001, 4 pp.
Buck, et al., “Self-Calibrating Microphone Arrays for Speech Signal Acquisition: A Systematic Approach,” Signal Processing, vol. 86, 2006, pp. 1230-1238.
Burton, et al., “A New Structure for Combining Echo Cancellation and Beamforming in Changing Acoustical Environments,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007, pp. 1-77-1-80.
Cabral, et al., Glottal Spectral Separation for Speech Synthesis, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2013, 15 pp.
Campbell, “Adaptive Beamforming Using a Microphone Array for Hands-Free Telephony,” Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Feb. 1999, 154 pgs.
Canetto, et al., “Speech Enhancement Systems Based on Microphone Arrays,” VI Conference of the Italian Society for Applied and Industrial Mathematics, May 27, 2002, 9 pp.
Cech, et al., “Active-Speaker Detection and Localization with Microphones and Cameras Embedded into a Robotic Head,” IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Oct. 2013, pp. 203-210.
Chan, et al., “Uniform Concentric Circular Arrays with Frequency-Invariant Characteristics-Theory, Design, Adaptive Beamforming and DOA Estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 165-177.
Chau, et al., “A Subband Beamformer on an Ultra Low-Power Miniature DSP Platform,” 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 4 pp.
Chen, et al., “A General Approach to the Design and Implementation of Linear Differential Microphone Arrays,” Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference, 2013 Asia-Pacific, IEEE, 7 pp.
Chen, et al., “Design and Implementation of Small Microphone Arrays,” PowerPoint Presentation, Northwestern Polytechnical University and Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Jan. 1, 2014, 56 pp.
Chen, et al., “Design of Robust Broadband Beamformers with Passband Shaping Characteristics using Tikhonov Regularization,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 17, No. 4, May 2009, pp. 565-681.
Chu, “Desktop Mic Array for Teleconferencing,” 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 1995, pp. 2999-3002.
ClearOne Introduces Ceiling Microphone Array With Built-In Dante Interface, Press Release; GlobeNewswire, Jan. 8, 2019, 2 pp.
ClearOne, Clearly Speaking Blog, “Advanced Beamforming Microphone Array Technology for Corporate Conferencing Systems,” Nov. 11, 2013, 5 pp., http://www.clearone.com/blog/advanced-beamforming-microphone-array-technology-for-corporate-conferencing-systems/.
ClearOne, Beamforming Microphone Array, Mar. 2012, 6 pgs.
ClearOne, Ceiling Microphone Array Installation Manual, Jan. 9, 2012, 20 pgs.
ClearOne, Converge/Converge Pro, Manual, 2008, 51 pp.
ClearOne, Professional Conferencing Microphones, Brochure, Mar. 2015, 3 pp.
Coleman, “Loudspeaker Array Processing for Personal Sound Zone Reproduction,” Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, 2014, 239 pp.
Cook, et al., An Alternative Approach to Interpolated Array Processing for Uniform Circular Arrays, Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, 2002, pp. 411-414.
Cox, et al., “Robust Adaptive Beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, No. 10, Oct. 1987, pp. 1365-1376.
CTG Audio, Ceiling Microphone CTG CM-01, Jun. 5, 2008, 2 pgs.
CTG Audio, CM-01 & CM-02 Ceiling Microphones Specifications, 2 pgs.
CTG Audio, CM-01 & CM-02 Ceiling Microphones, 2017, 4 pgs.
CTG Audio, Expand Your IP Teleconferencing to Full Room Audio, Obtained from website htt.)://www ct audio com/exand-, our-i - teleconforencino-to-ful-room-audio-while-conquennc.1 -echo-cancelation-issues Mull, 2014.
CTG Audio, Installation Manual, Nov. 21, 2008, 25 pgs.
CTG Audio, White on White—Introducing the CM-02 Ceiling Microphone, https://ctgaudio.com/white-on-white-introducing-the-cm-02-ceiling-microphone/, Feb. 20, 2014, 3 pgs.
Dahl et al., Acoustic Echo Cancelling with Microphone Arrays, Research Report 3/95, Univ, of Karlskrona/Ronneby, Apr. 1995, 64 pgs.
Decawave, Application Note: APR001, Uwb Regulations, A Summary of Worldwide Telecommunications Regulations governing the use of Ultra-Wideband radio, Version 1.2, 2015, 63 pp.
Desiraju, et al., “Efficient Multi-Channel Acoustic Echo Cancellation Using Constrained Sparse Filter Updates in the Subband Domain,” Acoustic Speech Enhancement Research, Sep. 2014, 4 pp.
Dibiase et al., Robust Localization in Reverberent Rooms, in Brandstein, ed., Microphone Arrays: Techniques and Applications, 2001, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 157-180.
Do et al., A Real-Time SRP-PHAT Source Location Implementation using Stochastic Region Contraction (SRC) on a Large-Aperture Microphone Array, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing—ICASSP '07. Apr. 2007, pp. I-121—I-124.
Dormehl, “HoloLens concept lets you control your smart home via augmented reality,” digitaltrends, Jul. 26, 2016, 12 pp.
Fan, et al., “Localization Estimation of Sound Source by Microphones Array,” Procedia Engineering 7, 2010, pp. 312-317.
Firoozabadi, et al., “Combination of Nested Microphone Array and Subband Processing for Multiple Simultaneous Speaker Localization,” 6th International Symposium on Telecommunications, Nov. 2012, pp. 907-912.
Flanagan et al., Autodirective Microphone Systems, Acustica, vol. 73, 1991, pp. 58-71.
Flanagan, et al., “Computer-Steered Microphone Arrays for Sound Transduction in Large Rooms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78 (5), Nov. 1985, pp. 1508-1518.
Fox, et al., “A Subband Hybrid Beamforming for In-Car Speech Enhancement,” 20th European Signal rocessing Conference, Aug. 2012, 5 pp.
Frost, III, An Algorithm for Linearly Constrained Adaptive Array Processing, Proc. IEEE, vol. 60, No. 8, Aug. 1972, pp. 926-935.
Gannot et al., Signal Enhancement using Beamforming and Nonstationarity with Applications to Speech, IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing, vol. 49, No. 8, Aug. 2001, pp. 1614-1626.
Gansler et al., A Double-Talk Detector Based on Coherence, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 44, No. 11, Nov. 1996, pp. 1421-1427.
Gazor et al., Robust Adaptive Beamforming via Target Tracking, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 44, No. 6, Jun. 1996, pp. 1589-1593.
Gazor et al., Wideband Multi-Source Beamforming with Adaptive Array Location Calibration and Direction Finding, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 1995, pp. 1904-1907.
Gentner Communications Corp., AP400 Audio Perfect 400 Audioconferencing System Installation & Operation Manual, Nov. 1998, 80 pgs.
Gentner Communications Corp., XAP 800 Audio Conferencing System Installation & Operation Manual, Oct. 2001, 152 pgs.
Gil-Cacho et al., Multi-Microphone Acoustic Echo Cancellation Using Multi-Channel Warped Linear Prediction of Common Acoustical Poles, 18th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug. 2010, pp. 2121-2125.
Giuliani, et al., “Use of Different Microphone Array Configurations for Hands-Free Speech Recognition in Noisy and Reverberant Environment,” IRST-lstituto per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Sep. 22, 1997, 4 pp.
Gritton et al., Echo Cancellation Algorithms, IEEE ASSP Magazine, vol. 1, issue 2, Apr. 1984, pp. 30-38.
Hamalainen, et al., “Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Dynamically Steered Microphone Array Systems,” 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, Oct. 2007, pp. 58-61.
Hayo, Virtual Controls for Real Life, Web page downloaded from https://hayo.io/ on Sep. 18, 2019, 19 pp.
Herbordt et al., A Real-time Acoustic Human-Machine Front-End for Multimedia Applications Integrating Robust Adaptive Beamforrning and Stereophonic Acoustic Echo Cancellation, 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sep. 2002, 4 pgs.
Herbordt et al., GSAEC - Acoustic Echo Cancellation embedded into the Generalized Sidelobe Canceller, 10th European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 2000, 5 pgs.
Herbordt et al., Multichannel Bin-Wise Robust Frequency-Domain Adaptive Filtering and Its Application to Adaptive Beamforming, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 15, No. 4, May 2007, pp. 1340-1351.
Herbordt, “Combination of Robust Adaptive Beamforming with Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Acoustic Human/Machine Interfaces,” Friedrich-Alexander University, 2003, 293 pgs.
Herbordt, et al., Joint Optimization of LCMV Beamforming and Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Automatic Speech Recognition, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Mar. 2005, pp. HI-77 - III-80.
Holm, “Optimizing Microphone Arrays for use in Conference Halls,” Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Jun. 2009, 101 pp.
Huang et al., Immersive Audio Schemes: The Evolution of Multiparty Teleconferencing, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jan. 2011, pp. 20-32.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/022773 dated Jun. 10, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/013155 dated Jun. 8, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/031833 dated Jul. 24, 2019, 16 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/033470 dated Jul. 31, 2019, 12 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/051989 dated Jan. 10, 2020, 15 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/024063 dated Aug. 31, 2020, 18 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/035185 dated Sep. 15, 2020, 11 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/058385 dated Mar. 31, 2021,20 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2021/070625 dated Sep. 17, 2021, 17 pp.
International Search Report for PCT/US2020/024005 dated Jun. 12, 2020, 12 pp.
Invensense, “Microphone Array Beamforming,” Application Note AN-1140, Dec. 31, 2013, 12 pp.
Ishii et al., Investigation on Sound Localization using Multiple Microphone Arrays, Reflection and Spatial Information, Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, JSAI Technical Report, SIG-Challenge-B202-11,2012, pp. 64-69.
Ito et al., Aerodynamic/Aeroacoustic Testing in Anechoic Closed Test Sections of Low-speed Wind Tunnels, 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2010,11 pgs.
Johansson et al., Robust Acoustic Direction of Arrival Estimation using Root-SRP-PHAT, a Realtime Implementation, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Mar. 2005, 4 pgs.
Johansson, et al., Speaker Localisation using the Far-Field SRP-PHAT in Conference Telephony, 2002 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, 5 pgs.
Julstrom et al., Direction-Sensitive Gating: A New Approach to Automatic Mixing, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 32, No. 7/8, Jul./Aug. 1984, pp. 490-506.
Kahrs, Ed., The Past, Present, and Future of Audio Signal Processing, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Sep. 1997, pp. 30-57.
Kallinger et al., Multi-Microphone Residual Echo Estimation, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 2003, 4 pgs.
Kammeyer, et al., New Aspects of Combining Echo Cancellers with Beamformers, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Mar. 2005, pp. ill-137 -111-140.
Kellermann, A Self-Steering Digital Microphone Array, 1991 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 1991, pp. 3581-3584.
Kellermann, Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Beamforming Microphone Arrays, in Brandstein, ed., Microphone Arrays: Techniques and Applications, 2001, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 281-306.
Kellermann, Integrating Acoustic Echo Cancellation with Adaptive Beamforming Microphone Arrays, Forum Acusticum, Berlin, Mar. 1999, pp. 1-4.
Kellermann, Strategies for Combining Acoustic Echo Cancellation and Adaptive Beamforming Microphone Arrays, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 1997, 4 pgs.
Knapp, et al., The Generalized Correlation Method for Estimation of Time Delay, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-24, No. 4, Aug. 1976, pp. 320-327.
Kobayashi et al., A Hands-Free Unit with Noise Reduction by Using Adaptive Beamformer, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 54, No. 1, Feb. 2008, pp. 116-122.
Kobayashi et al., A Microphone Array System with Echo Canceller, Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 3, vol. 89, No. 10, Feb. 2, 2006, pp. 23-32.
Lebret, et al., Antenna Array Pattern Synthesis via Convex Cptimization, IEEE Trans, on Signal Processing, vol. 45, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 526-532.
LecNet2 Sound System Design Guide, Lectrosonics, Jun. 2, 2006.
Lectrosonics, LecNet2 Sound System Design Guide, Jun. 2006, 28 pgs.
Lee et al., Multichannel Teleconferencing System with Multispatial Region Acoustic Echo Cancellation, International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control (IWAENC2003), Sep. 2003, pp. 51-54.
Lindstrom et al., An Improvement of the Two-Path Algorithm Transfer Logic for Acoustic Echo Cancellation, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 15, No. 4, May 2007, pp. 1320-1326.
Liu et al., Adaptive Beamforming with Sidelobe Control: A Second-Order Cone Programming Approach, IEEE Signal Proc. Letters, vol. 10, No. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 331-334.
Liu, et al., “Frequency Invariant Beamforming in Subbands,” IEEE Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004, 5 pp.
Lobo, et al., Applications of Second-Order Cone Programming, Linear Algebra and its Applications 284, 1998, pp. 193-228.
Luo et al., Wideband Beamforming with Broad Nulls of Nested Array, Third Int'l Conf, on Info. Science and Tech., Mar. 23-25, 2013, pp. 1645-1648.
Marquardt et al., A Natural Acoustic Front-End for Interactive TV in the EU-Project Dicit, IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing, Aug. 2009, pp. 894-899.
Martin, Small Microphone Arrays with Postfilters for Noise and Acoustic Echo Reduction, in Brandstein, ed., Microphone Arrays: Techniques and Applications, 2001, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 255-279.
Maruo et al., On the Optimal Solutions of Beamformer Assisted Acoustic Echo Cancellers, IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop, 2011, pp. 641-644.
McCowan, Microphone Arrays: A Tutorial, Apr. 2001, 36 pgs.
Microphone Array Primer, Shure Question and Answer Page, <https://service.shure.eom/s/article/microphone-array-primer?language=en_US>, Jan. 2019, 5 pp.
Mohammed, A New Adaptive Beamformer for Optimal Acoustic Echo and Noise Cancellation with Less Computational Load, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, May 2008, p. 000123-000128.
Mohammed, A New Robust Adaptive Beamformer for Enhancing Speech Corrupted with Colored Noise, AICCSA, Apr. 2008, pp. 508-515.
Mohammed, Real-time Implementation of an efficient RLS Algorithm based on HR Filter for Acoustic Echo Cancellation, AICCSA, Apr. 2008, pp. 489-494.
Mohan, et al., “Localization of multiple acoustic sources with small arrays using a coherence test,” Journal Acoustic Soc Am., 123(4), Apr. 2008, 12 pp.
Moulines, et al., “Pitch-Synchronous Waveform Processing Techniques for Text-to-Speech Synthesis Using Diphones,” Speech Communication 9, 1990, 15 pp.
Multichannel Acoustic Echo Cancellation, Obtained from website http://www.buchner-net.com/mcaec.html, Jun. 2011.
Myllyla et al., Adaptive Beamforming Methods for Dynamically Steered Microphone Array Systems, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Mar.-Apr. 2008, pp. 305-308.
New Shure Microflex Advance MXA910 Microphone With Intellimix Audio Processing Provides Greater Simplicity, Flexibility, Clarity, Press Release, Jun. 12, 2019, 4 pp.
Nguyen-Ky, et al., “An Improved Error Estimation Algorithm for Stereophonic Acoustic Echo Cancellation Systems,” 1st International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 17-19, 2007, 5 pp.
Office Action for Taiwan Patent Application No. 105109900 dated May 5, 2017.
Oh, et al., “Hands-Free Voice Communication in an Automobile With a Microphone Array,” 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Mar. 1992, pp. 1-281—I-284.
Omologo, Multi-Microphone Signal Processing for Distant-Speech Interaction, Human Activity and Vision Summer School (HAVSS), INRIA Sophia Antipolis, Oct. 3, 2012, 79 pgs.
Order, Conduct of the Proceeding, Clearone, Inc.v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., Nov. 2, 2020, 10 pp.
Pados et al., An Iterative Algorithm for the Computation of the MVDR Filter, IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing, vol. 49, No. 2, Feb. 2001, pp. 290-300.
Palladino, “This App Lets You Control Your Smarthome Lights via Augmented Reality,” Next Reality Mobile AR News, Jul. 2, 2018, 5 pp.
Parikh, et al., “Methods for Mitigating IP Network Packet Loss in Real Time Audio Streaming Applications,” GatesAir, 2014, 6 pp.
Pasha, et al., “Clustered Multi-channel Dereverberation for Ad-hoc Microphone Arrays,” Proceedings of APSIPA Annual Summit and Conference, Dec. 2015, pp. 274-278.
Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions, Clearone, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., Aug. 24, 2020, 20 pp.
Pettersen, “Broadcast Applications for Voice-Activated Microphones,” db, Jul./Aug. 1985, 6 pgs.
Pfeifenberger, et al., “Nonlinear Residual Echo Suppression using a Recurrent Neural Network,” Interspeech 2020, 5 pp.
Phoenix Audio Technologies, “Beamforming and Microphone Arrays—Common Myths”, Apr. 2016, http://info.phnxaudio.com/blog/microphone-arrays-beamforming-myths-1, 19 pp.
Plascore, PCGA-XR1 3003 Aluminum Honeycomb Data Sheet, 2008, 2 pgs.
Polycom Inc., Vortex EF2211/EF2210 Reference Manual, 2003, 66 pgs.
Polycom, Inc., Polycom Soundstructure C16, C12, C8, and SR12 Design Guide, Nov. 2013, 743 pgs.
Polycom, Inc., Setting Up the Polycom HDX Ceiling Microphone Array Series, https://support.polycom.com/content/dam/polycom-support/products/Telepresence-and-Video/HDX %20Series/setup-maintenance/en/hdx_ceiling_microphone_array_setting_up.pdf, 2010, 16 pgs.
Polycom, Inc., Vortex EF2241 Reference Manual, 2002, 68 pgs.
Polycom, Inc., Vortex EF2280 Reference Manual, 2001, 60 pp.
Powers, et al., “Proving Adaptive Directional Technology Works: A Review of Studies,” The Hearing Review, Apr. 6, 2004, 5 pp.
Rabinkin et al., Estimation of Wavefront Arrival Delay Using the Cross-Power Spectrum Phase Technique, 132nd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Dec. 1996, pp. 1-10.
Rane Corp., Halogen Acoustic Echo Cancellation Guide, AEC Guide Version 2, Nov. 2013, 16 pgs.
Rao, et al., “Fast LMS/Newton Algorithms for Stereophonic Acoustic Echo Cancelation,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 57, No. 8, Aug. 2009.
Reuven et al., Joint Acoustic Echo Cancellation and Transfer Function GSC in the Frequency Domain, 23rd IEEE Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, Sep. 2004, pp. 412-415.
Reuven et al., Joint Noise Reduction and Acoustic Echo Cancellation Using the Transfer-Function Generalized Sidelobe Canceller, Speech Communication, vol. 49, 2007, pp. 623-635.
Reuven, et al., “Multichannel Acoustic Echo Cancellation and Noise Reduction in Reverberant Environments Using the Transfer-Function GSC,” 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Apr. 2007, 4 pp.
Ristimaki, Distributed Microphone Array System for Two-Way Audio Communication, Helsinki Univ, of Technology, Master's Thesis, Jun. 15, 2009, 73 pgs.
Rombouts et al., An Integrated Approach to Acoustic Noise and Echo Cancellation, Signal Processing 85, 2005, pp. 849-871.
Sallberg, “Faster Subband Signal Processing,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 30, No. 5, Sep. 2013, 6 pp.
Sasaki et al., A Predefined Command Recognition System Using a Ceiling Microphone Array in Noisy Housing Environments, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 2008, pp. 2178-2184.
Sennheiser, New microphone solutions for ceiling and desk installation, https://en-US.sennheiser.com/news-new-microphone-solutions-for-ceiling-and-desk-installation, Feb. 2011, 2 pgs.
Sennheiser, TeamConnect Ceiling, https://en-US.sennheiser.com/conference-meeting-rooms-teamconnect-ceiling, 7 pgs.
Serdes, Wikipedia article, last edited on Jun. 25, 2018: retrieved on Jun. 27, 2018, 3 pp., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SerDes.
Sessler, et al., “Directional Transducers,” IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, vol. AU-19, No. 1, Mar. 1971, pp. 19-23.
Shure AMS Update, vol. 1, No. 1, 1983, 2 pgs.
Shure AMS Update, vol. 1, No. 2, 1983, 2 pgs.
Shure AMS Update, vol. 4, No. 4, 1997, 8 pgs.
Shure Inc., Microflex Advance, http://www.shure.com/americas/microflex-advance, 12 pgs.
Shure Inc., MX395 Low Profile Boundary Microphones, 2007, 2 pgs.
Shure Inc., MXA910 Ceiling Array Microphone, http://www.shure.com/americas/products/microphones/microflex-advance/mxa910-ceiling-array-microphone, 7 pgs.
Signal Processor MRX7-D Product Specifications, Yamaha Corporation, 2016.
Silverman et al., Performance of Real-Time Source-Location Estimators for a Large-Aperture Microphone Array, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 13, No. 4, Jul. 2005, pp. 593-606.
Sinha, Ch. 9: Noise and Echo Cancellation, in Speech Processing in Embedded Systems, Springer, 2010, pp. 127-142.
Soda et al., Introducing Multiple Microphone Arrays for Enhancing Smart Home Voice Control, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Technical Report of IEICE, Jan. 2013, 6 pgs.
Soundweb London Application Guides, BSS Audio, 2010.
Symetrix, Inc., SymNet Network Audio Solutions Brochure, 2008, 32 pgs.
SymNet Network Audio Solutions Brochure, Symetrix, Inc., 2008.
Tan, et al., “Pitch Detection Algorithm: Autocorrelation Method and AMDF,” Department of Computer Engineering, Prince of Songkhla University, Jan. 2003, 6 pp.
Tandon, et al., “An Efficient, Low-Complexity, Normalized LMS Algorithm for Echo Cancellation,” 2nd Annual IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems, Jun. 2004, pp. 161-164.
Tetelbaum et al., Design and Implementation of a Conference Phone Based on Microphone Array Technology, Proc. Global Signal Processing Conference and Expo (GSPx), Sep. 2004, 6 pgs.
Tiete et al., SoundCompass: A Distributed MEMS Microphone Array-Based Sensor for Sound Source Localization, SENSORS, Jan. 23, 2014, pp. 1918-1949.
TOACorp., Ceiling Mount Microphone AN-9001 Operating Instructions, http://www.toaelectronics.com/media/an9001_mt1e.pdf, 1 pg.
Togami, et al., “Subband Beamformer Combined with Time-Frequency ICAfor Extraction of Target Source Under Reverberant Environments,” 17th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug. 2009, 5 pp.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/598,918, filed Oct. 10, 2019, 50 pp.
Van Compernolle, Switching Adaptive Filters for Enhancing Noisy and Reverberant Speech from Microphone Array Recordings, Proc. IEEE Inf. Conf, on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 1990, pp. 833-836.
Van Trees, Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, 2002, 54 pgs., pp. i-xxv, 90-95, 201-230.
Van Veen et al., Beamforming: A Versatile Approach to Spatial Filtering, IEEE Assp Magazine, vol. 5, issue 2, Apr. 1988, pp. 4-24.
Wang et al., Combining Superdirective Beamforming and Frequency-Domain Blind Source Separation for Highly Reverberant Signals, EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, vol. 2010, pp. 1-13.
Weinstein, et al., “Loud: A 1020-Node Microphone Array and Acoustic Beamformer,” 14th International Congress on Sound & Vibration, Jul. 2007, 8 pgs.
Weinstein, et al., “LOUD: A1020-Node Modular Microphone Array and Beamformer for Intelligent Computing Spaces,” MIT Computer Science and Artifical Intelligence Laboratory, 2004, 18 pp.
Wung, “A System Approach to Multi-Channel Acoustic Echo Cancellation and Residual Echo Suppression for Robust Hands-Free Teleconferencing,” Georgia Institute of Technology, May 2015, 167 pp.
XAP Audio Conferencing Brochure, ClearOne Communications, Inc., 2002.
Yamaha Corp., MRX7-D Signal Processor Product Specifications, 2016, 12 pgs.
Yamaha Corp., PJP-100H IP Audio Conference System Owner's Manual, Sep. 2006, 59 pgs.
Yamaha Corp., PJP-EC200 Conference Echo Canceller Brochure, Oct. 2009, 2 pgs.
Yan et al., Convex Optimization Based Time-Domain Broadband Beamforming with Sidelobe Control, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 121, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 46-49.
Yensen et al., Synthetic Stereo Acoustic Echo Cancellation Structure with Microphone Array Beamforming for VOIP Conferences, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Jun. 2000, pp. 817-820.
Yermeche, et al., “Real-Time DSP Implementation of a Subband Beamforming Algorithm for Dual Microphone Speech Enhancement,” 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 4 pp.
Zavarehei, et al., “Interpolation of Lost Speech Segments Using LP-HNM Model with Codebook Post-Processing,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 10, No. 3, Apr. 2008, 10 pp.
Zhang, et al., “F-T-LSTM based Complex Network for Joint Acoustic Echo Cancellation and Speech Enhancement,” Audio, Speech and Language Processing Group, Jun. 2021,5 pp.
Zhang, et al., “Multichannel Acoustic Echo Cancelation in Multiparty Spatial Audio Conferencing with Constrained Kalman Filtering,” 11th International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control, Sep. 14, 2008, 4 pp.
Zhang, et al., “Selective Frequency Invariant Uniform Circular Broadband Beamformer,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2010, pp. 1-11.
Zheng, et al., “Experimental Evaluation of a Nested Microphone Array With Adaptive Noise Cancellers,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 53, No. 3, Jun. 2004,10 PP-.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200374624 A1 Nov 2020 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62960502 Jan 2020 US
62851819 May 2019 US